Blazersedge: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
New Blog: The Boxing Bulletin for Boxing Fans!

B.Roy approves of backup PF Ronny Turiaf to be a Blazer.

According to 95.5 The Game' "Wheels At Work"  Brandon Roy has told them that the player that he would identify as fitting the Blazers need at the back-up Power Forward position is 6'10" 26 year old Ronny Turiaf

Ronny currently is backup on Golden State and made $4.5M in 2009.  This is a reasonable contract to make a move for, since both Blake and Travis have similar contracts to trade and Portland has enough room to absorb Turiaf's contract if a lopsided trade were to take place.


Personally I like Ronny Turiaf, but what do you guys think about having Turiaf as part of our line-up and just how do you think he would be acquired by Portland?

If we added Ronny, what other piece could Portland still go after to add in addition to finish out the roster for next season?


Poll
Would I like to have Ronny Turiaf brought in as the back-up PF for this young Blazers franchise?
Yes, this move would be awesome and Turiaf would become a fan favorite
506 votes
I'd be fine with it, just not super stoked
540 votes
No, I don't think Ronny Turiaf is the answer
116 votes

1162 votes | Poll has closed

7 recs  |  Comment 302 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Im suprised we haven't talked about it more around here.

He is a great fit. Exactly what we need.

But i really hate him. Can’t stand him

Officer:Why did you kill your husband ?
Crazy Woman: Because I love too much!

by YikesItsCameron on Jun 9, 2009 1:59 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Cuz he was a laker and his dumb hair and stupid beard and dumb teeth.

Idk he just rubs me the wrong way. not as much as birdman but he still just irks me.

Officer:Why did you kill your husband ?
Crazy Woman: Because I love too much!

by YikesItsCameron on Jun 9, 2009 2:08 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I can’t believe you don’t like him.

He is the perfect teammate and a damn hard worker.

by GUnit on Jun 9, 2009 2:11 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I love Turiaf as a guy, that’s for sure.

proud hinrichsheeple

by Cablinasian on Jun 9, 2009 2:12 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Sure you wouldn't prefer him as a girl?

Turiaf wasn’t an evil Laker anyway. Never Odomized anyone or anything like that. Isn’t he French or something?

I’ll make fun of his hair, but not his teeth. Can he help his dumb teeth?

He can play backup C in case of injury? He can play defense on PF? Seems like it.

The one worry I have is I haven’t seen him play on a real nice defense. We would be dropping the offensive aspect by getting this guy, so I want to know he can be a strong piece on a smooth defense like Spurs past and Houston now.

…I’ll be pissed if this is another one of Roy’s lame ’I’m a little sissy Kobe" things!

by staylost on Jun 9, 2009 5:38 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

He's from hati or something

he has the coolest sounding accent in the world

by StocktonNEP on Jun 9, 2009 11:42 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

He is from Martinique

Martinique is a small island in the Caribbean that is owned by France, so Turiaf is a French citizen and plays on the French national team.

by trk on Jun 10, 2009 1:43 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Batum's new best buddy

Gotta look out for our long-term SF.

by antediluvian on Jun 10, 2009 9:22 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Interestnig point

I’ve considered Turiaf to be an excellent banger and hard worker, and thought he would be a great fit. Glad other people are articulating the idea.

by lurtsman on Jun 10, 2009 10:03 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

He's a pirate

I'm a really really ridiculously good looking orange mocha frappaccino drinking manhammer sandwich

by hobobob on Jun 10, 2009 9:48 AM PDT up reply actions   1 recs

Pirates are very cool!

COMCAST SUCKS!!
"Let's win the playoffs!!!!!"- Rudy Fernandez

by shamman on Jun 10, 2009 9:29 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

They keep the FSM happy

Just think what the Blazers could do with a spare noodly appendage!

by DonkeyShins on Jun 11, 2009 12:52 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

They drafted him

what was he supposed to do about it?

Life is exhausting when you are this stupid.

by jonestr on Jun 9, 2009 2:21 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Go to Europe instead.

Anything other than playing for the Abomination of Desolation. Is it just me, or did anyone else realize you must have ‘la’ to spell desolation?

Can I buy you a fish sandwich?

by silkybrown on Jun 9, 2009 4:34 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Desolation Row

They’re selling postcards of the hanging
They’re painting the passports brown
The beauty parlor is filled with sailors
The circus is in town
Here comes the blind commissioner
They’ve got him in a trance
One hand is tied to the tight-rope walker
The other is in his pants
And the riot squad they’re restless
They need somewhere to go
As Lady and I look out tonight
From Desolation Row

Cinderella, she seems so easy
“It takes one to know one,” she smiles
And puts her hands in her back pockets
Bette Davis style
And in comes Romeo, he’s moaning
“You Belong to Me I Believe”
And someone says," You’re in the wrong place, my friend
You better leave"
And the only sound that’s left
After the ambulances go
Is Cinderella sweeping up
On Desolation Row

Now the moon is almost hidden
The stars are beginning to hide
The fortunetelling lady
Has even taken all her things inside
All except for Cain and Abel
And the hunchback of Notre Dame
Everybody is making love
Or else expecting rain
And the Good Samaritan, he’s dressing
He’s getting ready for the show
He’s going to the carnival tonight
On Desolation Row

Now Ophelia, she’s ’neath the window
For her I feel so afraid
On her twenty-second birthday
She already is an old maid

To her, death is quite romantic
She wears an iron vest
Her profession’s her religion
Her sin is her lifelessness
And though her eyes are fixed upon
Noah’s great rainbow
She spends her time peeking
Into Desolation Row

Einstein, disguised as Robin Hood
With his memories in a trunk
Passed this way an hour ago
With his friend, a jealous monk
He looked so immaculately frightful
As he bummed a cigarette
Then he went off sniffing drainpipes
And reciting the alphabet
Now you would not think to look at him
But he was famous long ago
For playing the electric violin
On Desolation Row

Dr. Filth, he keeps his world
Inside of a leather cup
But all his sexless patients
They’re trying to blow it up
Now his nurse, some local loser
She’s in charge of the cyanide hole
And she also keeps the cards that read
“Have Mercy on His Soul”
They all play on penny whistles
You can hear them blow
If you lean your head out far enough
From Desolation Row

Across the street they’ve nailed the curtains
They’re getting ready for the feast
The Phantom of the Opera
A perfect image of a priest
They’re spoonfeeding Casanova
To get him to feel more assured
Then they’ll kill him with self-confidence
After poisoning him with words

And the Phantom’s shouting to skinny girls
“Get Outa Here If You Don’t Know
Casanova is just being punished for going
To Desolation Row”

Now at midnight all the agents
And the superhuman crew
Come out and round up everyone
That knows more than they do
Then they bring them to the factory
Where the heart-attack machine
Is strapped across their shoulders
And then the kerosene
Is brought down from the castles
By insurance men who go
Check to see that nobody is escaping
To Desolation Row

Praise be to Nero’s Neptune
The Titanic sails at dawn
And everybody’s shouting
“Which Side Are You On?”
And Ezra Pound and T. S. Eliot
Fighting in the captain’s tower
While calypso singers laugh at them
And fishermen hold flowers
Between the windows of the sea
Where lovely mermaids flow
And nobody has to think too much
About Desolation Row

Yes, I received your letter yesterday
(About the time the door knob broke)
When you asked how I was doing
Was that some kind of joke?
All these people that you mention
Yes, I know them, they’re quite lame
I had to rearrange their faces
And give them all another name
Right now I can’t read too good
Don’t send me no more letters no
Not unless you mail them
From Desolation Row

Copyright ©1965; renewed 1993 Special Rider Music

VENTURA: It's drowning. It gives you the complete sensation that you are drowning. It is no good, because you -- I'll put it to you this way, you give me a waterboard, Dick Cheney and one hour, and I'll have him confess to the Sharon Tate murders.

by 22baylor on Jun 9, 2009 4:41 PM PDT up reply actions   1 recs

You type fast

and good!

"Just kidding"

by CatMan2 on Jun 9, 2009 5:43 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

cut and paste is my friend

I hope I don’t get busted for plagiarism. – Elgin

VENTURA: It's drowning. It gives you the complete sensation that you are drowning. It is no good, because you -- I'll put it to you this way, you give me a waterboard, Dick Cheney and one hour, and I'll have him confess to the Sharon Tate murders.

by 22baylor on Jun 10, 2009 10:56 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

best song from an amazing album

Truth never was or can be propagated by fire and sword - Albert Gallatin

Bayless sucks! Trade him; or at least stop the annoying bayless homerism. his best case is gilbert arenas which is something the blazers don't want and don't need. He was a KP mistake.

by Zaron5551 on Jun 9, 2009 8:02 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

if he did that

we would accuse him of being a draft dodger

dude cant win

Life is exhausting when you are this stupid.

by jonestr on Jun 9, 2009 9:35 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

You wish you could grow a sweet beard like Turiaf

You just rub me the wrong way with your wanna be zany commentary. Not as much as tom in hawaii, but still irks me.

Offseason:
PG Options: Mike Conley(T)
SG Options: Terrence Williams(D)
Forward Options: Ronnie Turiaf(T) - Damion James(D), Taj Gibson(D), Kevin Seraphin(D)

by TheGreatDane17 on Jun 9, 2009 2:49 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

haha GreatDane

You already whiped Reggie Evans off your offseason wishlist. Ronnie takes his place?

Gimmicks don't make dynasties

by WarEaglePDX on Jun 9, 2009 3:33 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Lol ! sorry!

Ah idk i just don’t like him. It has nothing to do with his work ethic or anything , and im sure he is a great guy. I just don’t like him thats all.

Officer:Why did you kill your husband ?
Crazy Woman: Because I love too much!

by YikesItsCameron on Jun 9, 2009 3:54 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Okay, so knocks on Ronny Turiaf are:

1.) He was a laker. Okay this is a legit reason to hate someone.
2.) Dumb Hair. Okay u can use this only if you are a 7th Grade gossip girl.
3.) Stupid Beard. Again, comment only to be used by teeniebopper gossip queens.
4.) Dumb Teeth. getting out of control with meager knocks on appearance.
5.) Persona Rubs the Wrong Way. this comment is allowable as part of being a fan is “watching” sports.

How about just saying the guy was a laker and rubs me the wrong way? Everything else is for the birds…

by Portland Dynasty on Jun 9, 2009 7:26 PM PDT up reply actions   2 recs

The positives for Turiaf are:

1.) High Energy
2.) Great Attitude
3.) Brandon Roy Approval
4.) Size and experience to play PF and C
5.) Effective Blocking on Defense
6.) Solid rebounder
7.) Not going to demand high minutes allowing Travis to remain a Blazer
8.) Gonzaga grad so has fans in the Pacific Northwest.
9.) Familiar with all Western Conference foes
10.) $4.5M contract that actually decreases over time.

by Portland Dynasty on Jun 9, 2009 7:35 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

lol...

the knocks totally outweigh the positives…

One Team to Rule Them All

by In Walks Rudy on Jun 9, 2009 7:38 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

to me Turiaf can hit the 18 ft jump shot at a high clip.

ive watched him on the lakers and the warriors. He has that shot on lock down.

by mandoman10 on Jun 11, 2009 9:36 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

So Turiaf is....

a stronger, more active, better blocking, improved rebounding but can still drain the 18 footer upgrade over Channing Frye.

Channing really did have opportunities to displace Travis at the PF, but his Blocking and Rebounding wasn’t good enough to surpass Travis’ ability to score. Whatever PF we get better shine in rebounding and defense.

by Portland Dynasty on Jun 11, 2009 10:33 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

+ 1

Love him.
Awesome Hair.
Awesome Beard.
Awesome Teeth (maybe not, but thats okay).

He fits as that elusive banger we have all been talking about.

* Building a Greg Oden Fanboy Treehouse Clubhouse this summer...

by OdenFanBoy on Jun 10, 2009 12:15 AM PDT up reply actions   1 recs

no joke

Roy is the best player in the world with the exception of Incarcerated Mike from Queensbridge .

by Nick Van Excellent on Jun 10, 2009 3:50 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Like....

Brian Grant?

I know less than half of you half as well as I should like, and I like less than half of you half as well as you deserve.

by haildablazer on Jun 10, 2009 6:56 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

ahh, Gonzaga guy right?

Come on you gotta listen unto me,
lay off that whiskey and let that cocaine be. ~Johnny Cash

by HurraKane212 on Jun 9, 2009 2:02 PM PDT reply actions   1 recs

yea

Officer:Why did you kill your husband ?
Crazy Woman: Because I love too much!

by YikesItsCameron on Jun 9, 2009 2:08 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I like him

as a second PF and third (fourth?) center.

OK, let’s get him – Elgin

VENTURA: It's drowning. It gives you the complete sensation that you are drowning. It is no good, because you -- I'll put it to you this way, you give me a waterboard, Dick Cheney and one hour, and I'll have him confess to the Sharon Tate murders.

by 22baylor on Jun 9, 2009 2:06 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Love his energy and his ability to play bigger.

In limited minutes, I say he’s exactly what we could use. I wouldn’t want him to play any more than 15-18 minutes, though.

"Respect everyone, fear no one." -TP

by Arby on Jun 9, 2009 2:07 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

I've bitched a lot in the past about terrible sidebar posts... This here is a great example of how to do a GOOD free agent post, I think.

1. Starts with a documented fact.

2. Includes stats.

3. Includes an opinion.

4. Even a good poll for bonus interest.

Perfectly done! REC.

"A bizarre and extremely rare hybrid Blazer/Laker fan, Timbo has always struggled to contain the Beast Within, like Dr. Jekyll, Bruce Banner, or Ted Kennedy." — Miled Animal

by timbo on Jun 9, 2009 2:07 PM PDT reply actions   1 recs

Turiaf would be functional and acceptable, but I'm dreaming big...

"A bizarre and extremely rare hybrid Blazer/Laker fan, Timbo has always struggled to contain the Beast Within, like Dr. Jekyll, Bruce Banner, or Ted Kennedy." — Miled Animal

by timbo on Jun 9, 2009 2:08 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

he had nearly the same RB marks as Frye this season. that’s not acceptable.

proud hinrichsheeple

by Cablinasian on Jun 9, 2009 2:09 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

YOU try rebounding all those 3-balls!!!

"A bizarre and extremely rare hybrid Blazer/Laker fan, Timbo has always struggled to contain the Beast Within, like Dr. Jekyll, Bruce Banner, or Ted Kennedy." — Miled Animal

by timbo on Jun 9, 2009 2:10 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

his percentage was the exact same number it was in 07-08, when in LA.

proud hinrichsheeple

by Cablinasian on Jun 9, 2009 2:11 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I'm not a huge fan. But the big crime to me is doing NOTHING, which is what happened last year with the same obvious need...

"A bizarre and extremely rare hybrid Blazer/Laker fan, Timbo has always struggled to contain the Beast Within, like Dr. Jekyll, Bruce Banner, or Ted Kennedy." — Miled Animal

by timbo on Jun 9, 2009 2:12 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

McDyess + Hinrich are a guaranteed WCF berth. If we do nothing with them out there, I’ll be disappointed.

proud hinrichsheeple

by Cablinasian on Jun 9, 2009 2:13 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Agreed

Getting Roni would just be “aiight”

McDyess has the extensive playoff experience that KP is looking for

Hinrich helps shore up the perimeter defense

It’s going to take some serious salary manipulation to get both of them under the ’09 cap-space, though.

(I’d hate to deal Blake away and see Hinrich get hurt, etc)

by two4larue on Jun 9, 2009 4:45 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

you think McDyess

would ever play in Portland? or he is planning on staying in Det forever

by GreatOden'sRaven on Jun 9, 2009 5:45 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

It would be a roll of the McDice to try to acquire him

Sorry. - Elgin

VENTURA: It's drowning. It gives you the complete sensation that you are drowning. It is no good, because you -- I'll put it to you this way, you give me a waterboard, Dick Cheney and one hour, and I'll have him confess to the Sharon Tate murders.

by 22baylor on Jun 10, 2009 10:57 AM PDT up reply actions   4 recs

rec

Roy is the best player in the world with the exception of Incarcerated Mike from Queensbridge .

by Nick Van Excellent on Jun 10, 2009 2:11 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I agree.

And if we are talking rebound percentages, he got alot more rebounds than frye cuz frye played two minute once a month, and turiaf played regular minutes.

We NEED To get someone this off season.

Officer:Why did you kill your husband ?
Crazy Woman: Because I love too much!

by YikesItsCameron on Jun 9, 2009 2:14 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Frye’s rebound marks were actually drastically better in seasons in which he had regular playing time.

proud hinrichsheeple

by Cablinasian on Jun 9, 2009 2:15 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Haslem and Turiaf LOOK like mashing 4s, but they’re mediocre mid-range jump shooting bigs.

proud hinrichsheeple

by Cablinasian on Jun 9, 2009 2:14 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

So do you think that turiaf is a step up or down from frye?

Officer:Why did you kill your husband ?
Crazy Woman: Because I love too much!

by YikesItsCameron on Jun 9, 2009 2:16 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

a step up.

proud hinrichsheeple

by Cablinasian on Jun 9, 2009 2:17 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

As far as team needs go...

…Turiaf is a step up. As far as overall basketball skills, I’d say it’s a toss-up leaning toward Channing. Channing’s a great player (and person) — we just don’t need what his buffet brings.

"The Edge... there is no honest way to explain it because the only people who really know where it is are the ones who have gone over."

by GonzoFan on Jun 9, 2009 2:32 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Frye

I think channing will be better in the long run. Turiaf is what he is right now. There is no potential upside. I think what Channing showed at the end of last season, when he got consistent minutes, is what you could get from him.

COMCAST SUCKS!!
"Let's win the playoffs!!!!!"- Rudy Fernandez

by shamman on Jun 10, 2009 9:36 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

The Problem Is...

Channing cant be productive with 10mpg. He is way too much of a rhythm shooter. I would rather have a high energy guy that does not need as many minutes to stabilize his game.

* Building a Greg Oden Fanboy Treehouse Clubhouse this summer...

by OdenFanBoy on Jun 11, 2009 3:47 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

thats true

Officer:Why did you kill your husband ?
Crazy Woman: Because I love too much!

by YikesItsCameron on Jun 9, 2009 2:19 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Start dreaming small
Paul Allen: seemed to imply hesitancy to go above salary cap next year also says "I’m the guy to hold his wallet on draft night"

Reminds me a lot of this comment I made a while ago: http://www.blazersedge.com/2009/3/23/807869/junk-drawer-3-23-if-a-blaz#13330938

by Norsktroll on Jun 9, 2009 2:17 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

quote source?

How did you guys win that?
"We scored enough points. We scored 107, they scored 105.
-Nate McMillan Postgame, 3/4/2009

by douglast on Jun 9, 2009 2:37 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Ben

In my link, the people listed. And myself.

by Norsktroll on Jun 9, 2009 2:40 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I followed your link

read the story about the tech company. Didn’t see the quote you have blocked in gray anywhere. Who is the guy being quoted, the one saying he’s going to hold his wallet?

How did you guys win that?
"We scored enough points. We scored 107, they scored 105.
-Nate McMillan Postgame, 3/4/2009

by douglast on Jun 9, 2009 3:03 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

gotcha

I was still looking for a link to the quote specifically, so I could read the rest of the context. I now see it in Ben’s post on the frontpage, so my guess is you got your original greybox off of twitter.

How did you guys win that?
"We scored enough points. We scored 107, they scored 105.
-Nate McMillan Postgame, 3/4/2009

by douglast on Jun 9, 2009 4:58 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I take the meaning to be the opposite of what you're saying
I’m the guy that has to hold on to his wallet on draft day. I throw a few ideas out there and hopefully some of those make sense."

That’s how Ben quoted it, and to me that makes it sound like PA is wanting to SPEND SPEND SPEND and everyone else is holding him back.

Mort’

by Mortimer on Jun 9, 2009 8:12 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I hear the comments the exact same way.

I think this guy really enjoys buying toys.

by Jacksonville on Jun 9, 2009 10:50 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Sounds like Paul Allen is naturally 'loose' with his wallett come draft day...

I agree with Mortimer, Paul Allen is saying that he enjoys being aggressive on draft day. Even though the economy is down, Paul Allen has hardly given Blazer fans anything to worry about as far as spending money on players. And right now with the direction the team has been going, I am certain he wants to enjoy the ride with KP.

by Portland Dynasty on Jun 10, 2009 1:38 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Draft, Develop & Pay Your Own Players

Take advantage of the Larry Bird exception, Win Championships

Offseason:
PG Options: Mike Conley(T)
SG Options: Terrence Williams(D)
Forward Options: Ronnie Turiaf(T) - Damion James(D), Taj Gibson(D), Kevin Seraphin(D)

by TheGreatDane17 on Jun 11, 2009 9:18 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

It's all about positioning this time of year....

He wouldn’t want to say “I’m ready and willing to open my wallet as wide as necessary and pay as much as possible.”

That’s just raising the price of everyone the team might try to get.

Heck, I think KP coached him on what to say.

by antediluvian on Jun 10, 2009 9:26 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Dreaming BIG is a good thing Timbo....

and Turiaf might not be “sexxxy” move that splashes the media-machine, BUT, with Turiaf being very attainable with his reasonable contract from a team in transition… it paves the way for Portland to make another move to bring in another player. We can’t very well expect EACH move to bring us a Dreaming Big player, but by getting a solid role player at a reasonable cost like Turiaf… Portland can still manuever to get a Mike Conley, Andre Miller, Ron Artest, or whomever you think has the right fit into this team.

Whatever KP gives up for Turiaf, there will be left over assets to do something else with.

by Portland Dynasty on Jun 9, 2009 7:31 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I wish the Warriors didn't like him that much.

Seems he is a huge fan favorite. We may very well have to give away much more then we get.

That worries me, but i have a feeling Travis would fit very well playing some…

NELLLLIEEEBALLLLL! yeah!

* Building a Greg Oden Fanboy Treehouse Clubhouse this summer...

by OdenFanBoy on Jun 11, 2009 3:58 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I’m not a big fan… he’s supposedly a tough inside guy, but his RB% of 11.7 is even more mediocre than LaMarcus’ 12. I want a dominant rebounder at the backup 4.

proud hinrichsheeple

by Cablinasian on Jun 9, 2009 2:08 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Turiaf played backup center for the Warriors

He played incredible help defense and had one of the highest blocks/min in the league. I think having Przybilla beside him would allow Turiaf to play his more natural PF position. His offensive game is ugly though. He gets most of them from hustle and running the floor.

"I'm at the thingamajig talking the yakety-yak" - Kenny Smith

by blzrfan on Jun 9, 2009 2:16 PM PDT up reply actions   1 recs

I like his weakside defense (not a huge fan of his man-to-man post D), but his rebounding worries me

proud hinrichsheeple

by Cablinasian on Jun 9, 2009 2:17 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yea...most backup PFs can't rebound very well

Reggie Evans is the one guy who comes to mind who rebounds well off the bench at the PF position.

"I'm at the thingamajig talking the yakety-yak" - Kenny Smith

by blzrfan on Jun 9, 2009 2:20 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Do you think McDyess would settle for a 14 MPG role at the end of his career? 19+ rebound rate is stellar.

proud hinrichsheeple

by Cablinasian on Jun 9, 2009 2:22 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I don't know

He went back to the Pistons after being waived by the Nuggets. They tells me he wasn’t really interested in chasing rings. Maybe he’s at the point where he values stability more than trophies.

"I'm at the thingamajig talking the yakety-yak" - Kenny Smith

by blzrfan on Jun 9, 2009 2:24 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I thought I heard that he was unhappy in Detroit after going back… not sure on that, though… I can’t find the link.

proud hinrichsheeple

by Cablinasian on Jun 9, 2009 2:31 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Well he could go to the WCF with us. :) I just couldn’t remember if he had made his feelings public or not.

proud hinrichsheeple

by Cablinasian on Jun 9, 2009 2:37 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Here you go...

…apparently he was not happy with the sweep, or the trade for AI.

http://nba-rumors.blogs.cbssports.com/mcc/blogs/view/10715084?tag=Antonio%20McDyess

"The Edge... there is no honest way to explain it because the only people who really know where it is are the ones who have gone over."

by GonzoFan on Jun 9, 2009 2:35 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

"At this point I just want to win and at least compete."

— Antonio McDyess, from an article published in the Detroit Free Press (4/28/2009)

"The Edge... there is no honest way to explain it because the only people who really know where it is are the ones who have gone over."

by GonzoFan on Jun 9, 2009 2:37 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Dyess

Bring him to Portland. Ideal mentor for anyone we draft to play 3rd PF.

Offseason:
PG Options: Mike Conley(T)
SG Options: Terrence Williams(D)
Forward Options: Ronnie Turiaf(T) - Damion James(D), Taj Gibson(D), Kevin Seraphin(D)

by TheGreatDane17 on Jun 9, 2009 2:40 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Turning 35 years old this fall

Can’t imagine McDyess playing much longer than 2 years. Injury issues worry me at that age.

"I'm at the thingamajig talking the yakety-yak" - Kenny Smith

by blzrfan on Jun 9, 2009 2:41 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I’d love him as a 10-14 MPG mentor type, though.

proud hinrichsheeple

by Cablinasian on Jun 9, 2009 2:41 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I agree

He would be an upgrade over our situation. This leaves Outlaw out of the loop. I can’t imagine the Blazers going into training camp with 3 SFs looking for playing time.

"I'm at the thingamajig talking the yakety-yak" - Kenny Smith

by blzrfan on Jun 9, 2009 2:44 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I’m not the world’s biggest Travis fan. If Martell proves he’s healthy, I’m fine with losing Trav.

proud hinrichsheeple

by Cablinasian on Jun 9, 2009 2:50 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

In a backup PF, that doesn't worry me

That is a role that most teams don’t have a set, consistent person filling.

A good, rebounding, limited in skill back up PF can be found all the time.

We just don’t have one now ;-)

by Mortimer on Jun 9, 2009 2:42 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Freeland

Needs to take the Scola route.

Offseason:
PG Options: Mike Conley(T)
SG Options: Terrence Williams(D)
Forward Options: Ronnie Turiaf(T) - Damion James(D), Taj Gibson(D), Kevin Seraphin(D)

by TheGreatDane17 on Jun 9, 2009 2:45 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

He is hard on the eyes

but Scola would be a perfect example of what we are looking for. Not to mention he actually has a jump shot, unlike Turiaf.

Greg Oden = Robert Parish - The only other rookie with more than 500 points, 400 rebounds, and 65 blocks in under 1400 minutes played. Since 1946

by FiveOhThree-RipCity!! on Jun 9, 2009 4:44 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Now would be a good time

Freeland finally showed some potential this year and the Blazers have multiple roster spots open.

"I'm at the thingamajig talking the yakety-yak" - Kenny Smith

by blzrfan on Jun 9, 2009 2:49 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Hahahaha

Injury issues. Funny stuff. McDyess lost all his athleticism long ago, due to injuries. Now he is simply surviving on hard work & hating to lose. He could teach our guys a lot, in terms of doing the most with your athleticism while you have it … And how to survive once its gone.

Offseason:
PG Options: Mike Conley(T)
SG Options: Terrence Williams(D)
Forward Options: Ronnie Turiaf(T) - Damion James(D), Taj Gibson(D), Kevin Seraphin(D)

by TheGreatDane17 on Jun 9, 2009 2:43 PM PDT up reply actions   1 recs

I just think the Blazers can make better use of the cap space

Signing an 35 year old backup PF to $4-5 million isn’t my idea of maximizing the space available. I want the Blazers to use that full $8 million to plug the PG starting role.

"I'm at the thingamajig talking the yakety-yak" - Kenny Smith

by blzrfan on Jun 9, 2009 2:47 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Better use of cap space

In that case, 10 million is much better spent on Artest then it is Kirk Hinrich.

Offseason:
PG Options: Mike Conley(T)
SG Options: Terrence Williams(D)
Forward Options: Ronnie Turiaf(T) - Damion James(D), Taj Gibson(D), Kevin Seraphin(D)

by TheGreatDane17 on Jun 9, 2009 2:51 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I think the PG situation is a more pressing need than backup PF

Better use of cap space doesn’t necessarily mean using the most.

"I'm at the thingamajig talking the yakety-yak" - Kenny Smith

by blzrfan on Jun 9, 2009 2:56 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

We want Hinrich, not Artest. I’d love Ron, but his shot selection doesn’t jive with Nate.

proud hinrichsheeple

by Cablinasian on Jun 9, 2009 2:57 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

McMillan

Plays Outlaw a lot & he has shaky shot selection. He would most definitely play Artest with his smothering defense.

Offseason:
PG Options: Mike Conley(T)
SG Options: Terrence Williams(D)
Forward Options: Ronnie Turiaf(T) - Damion James(D), Taj Gibson(D), Kevin Seraphin(D)

by TheGreatDane17 on Jun 9, 2009 4:32 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I hear ya

But the difference there is that Artest would be playing with the starters all the time, and Outlaw was doing a mix of that but the offense ran through him with the bench players.

Artest would be taking the ball out of Roy’s hands and taking bad shots, which is not something we want. Outlaw’s selection mostly just affects the 2nd unit.

Morty

by Mortimer on Jun 9, 2009 4:52 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

That's good to hear

but there are teams on the east coast that could offer him the same ‘chance’ to compete

You’d think at his age he’d rather go to a team like Cleveland or Orlando or L*A that’s right at the door of a championship.

Portland doesn’t have that pedigree, yet. Just potential

If KP can sell AM on PDX, then great. But I’m not getting my hopes up, yet

by two4larue on Jun 9, 2009 4:54 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I dont know.

At the time Denver didn’t have nearly the reputation they have now. Lots of things can change in a short time, welcome to the NBA.

* Building a Greg Oden Fanboy Treehouse Clubhouse this summer...

by OdenFanBoy on Jun 11, 2009 4:00 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

McDyess is definitely at a point where he wants a Contender

But even though McDyess is likely to choose a team that looks to be a contender over the next 3 seasons, I believe that at his age, McDyess is more interested in the playoffs than getting 25+mpg during the regular season.

It is all about going deep in the playoffs and maybe getting another ring. If Portland seems to be the most likley spot, then he would be coming to Portland. I don’t think that he is gonna be here though.

by Portland Dynasty on Jun 9, 2009 7:40 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

His offensive game is ugly though. He gets most of them from hustle and running the floor

And that’s a problem, because the defense could rotate “off” of RT and Joel when they’re both in the game. It would make it harder for the wing players to get open looks

need to have a backup 4 who is at least a threat to hit an mid-range J (like Scola, etc)

by two4larue on Jun 9, 2009 4:48 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I thought

he had a decent mid-range J.

One thing’s for sure, we’d have a lot better picks getting set (though Frye was actually decent at that), I’m just comparing to Outlaw.

by darkhelmit54 on Jun 9, 2009 8:47 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I like anyone

Who plays how I play in pick up games.

* Building a Greg Oden Fanboy Treehouse Clubhouse this summer...

by OdenFanBoy on Jun 10, 2009 12:23 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Isn't he just a fatter Brian Grant?

I guess he’s a good fit because Brian Grant was pretty much a back up. I think Turiaf is a swell guy, I’m just not going to get excited over a back up.

by tominhawaii on Jun 9, 2009 2:08 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

brian grant had better hair

"There are a few teams you have to watch out for in the fourth quarter."
"Yeah, but Portland definitely is not one of them."

-New Orleans Hornets broadcasters at the end of the third quarter with the Hornets leading 74-59. Portland later ends up winning 97-89.

"They don't mind him shooting that shot at all. Rudy Fernandez is not that great of a 3pt shooter."

-New Orleans Hornets broadcasters right after a Rudy Fernandez missed 3pter. Rudy Fernandez finished the game with three 3pters on six attempts.

by Tofu Anonymous on Jun 9, 2009 2:09 PM PDT up reply actions   1 recs

and a better face

One Team to Rule Them All

by In Walks Rudy on Jun 9, 2009 6:54 PM PDT up reply actions   1 recs

Yes !

A fatter french brian grant

Officer:Why did you kill your husband ?
Crazy Woman: Because I love too much!

by YikesItsCameron on Jun 9, 2009 2:09 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

No FAT comments please....

think about fatty, he is probably crying in his moms basement.

but seriously, enough of the 7th grade girl comments.

by Portland Dynasty on Jun 9, 2009 7:41 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Lol okay ill try to keep them to a minimum

Officer:Why did you kill your husband ?
Crazy Woman: Because I love too much!

by YikesItsCameron on Jun 9, 2009 9:33 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

We cant have a fat guy on our team!

Afterall, this is what it was like in the Blazers front office at the trade deadline…

KP: Shaq? No way! we dont want him, hes fat! Ike has to go though!

* Building a Greg Oden Fanboy Treehouse Clubhouse this summer...

by OdenFanBoy on Jun 10, 2009 12:25 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I would love Glen 'Big Baby' Davis...

that is one huge dude… talk about controlling the paint.

by Portland Dynasty on Jun 10, 2009 1:41 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

if he only did that

last year he was 120th in rebounding

by as11osu on Jun 10, 2009 2:15 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

15x30=450

Top third of his class!

by Zaig on Jun 11, 2009 1:58 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

love it

local kid, finals experiance

bayless leaves over my dead body
sign mike bibby

by thomasikehara on Jun 9, 2009 2:09 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

The guy is McDyess. Ridiculous 19% rebound rate, incredible defender, good mid-range shooter, and championship experience. Throw five million at him and he’ll come.

proud hinrichsheeple

by Cablinasian on Jun 9, 2009 2:11 PM PDT reply actions   1 recs

Love the Dyess

Lets get the 4 sewn up.

Offseason:
PG Options: Mike Conley(T)
SG Options: Terrence Williams(D)
Forward Options: Ronnie Turiaf(T) - Damion James(D), Taj Gibson(D), Kevin Seraphin(D)

by TheGreatDane17 on Jun 9, 2009 2:15 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Five million would be great for McDyess

if he would accept it from the Portland Trail Blazers. – Elgin

VENTURA: It's drowning. It gives you the complete sensation that you are drowning. It is no good, because you -- I'll put it to you this way, you give me a waterboard, Dick Cheney and one hour, and I'll have him confess to the Sharon Tate murders.

by 22baylor on Jun 9, 2009 2:39 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Love it

Do it do it KP.

BTW, question… So GM’s can do trades as soon as they are out of the playoffs? or….?(Regarding the evans trade)

Offseason:
PG Options: Mike Conley(T)
SG Options: Terrence Williams(D)
Forward Options: Ronnie Turiaf(T) - Damion James(D), Taj Gibson(D), Kevin Seraphin(D)

by TheGreatDane17 on Jun 9, 2009 2:41 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I absolutely love Turiaf

Tough as nails

Offseason:
PG Options: Mike Conley(T)
SG Options: Terrence Williams(D)
Forward Options: Ronnie Turiaf(T) - Damion James(D), Taj Gibson(D), Kevin Seraphin(D)

by TheGreatDane17 on Jun 9, 2009 2:13 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Brian Grant 2.0

defends, rebounds, quality guy. It is strange that his name hasn’t popped up here more often as a candidate for our backup 4 needs.

Tony Luftman Is an Animatronic Robot created by Cyberdyne Industries for the purpose of the destruction of the entire human race, no one shall be spared.

by Jiggamant on Jun 9, 2009 2:21 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

I think it's because the Warriors like him quite a bit

I don’t think they are looking to trade him.

"I'm at the thingamajig talking the yakety-yak" - Kenny Smith

by blzrfan on Jun 9, 2009 2:22 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

If B Roy likes it... I like it

Sergio + Outlaw for Turiaf?

Best of Senator Clay Davis: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TI4-QyAzY64&feature=related

by cloudydays on Jun 9, 2009 2:27 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

outlaw was born for the warriors' system

Tony Luftman Is an Animatronic Robot created by Cyberdyne Industries for the purpose of the destruction of the entire human race, no one shall be spared.

by Jiggamant on Jun 9, 2009 2:28 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yeah, Don Nelson

would have some fun messin’ with Travis. Ideal PF for the Warrior’s system

by two4larue on Jun 9, 2009 4:57 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Turiaf a great fit.

A good shot blocker
Tough rebounder
Can hit from the line
Aggressive defender
Good character
Willing to assume role player status.

Sign and trade w/Frye??

by Rip City Reign on Jun 9, 2009 2:27 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

it will take more

nelson really loves turiaf

i think any deal would have to include outlaw

bayless leaves over my dead body
sign mike bibby

by thomasikehara on Jun 9, 2009 5:49 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I am thinking we can get Turiaf for cheaper than Outlaw....

I say, KP signs Channing Frye to a 3 year deal starting at $3.0M (lower than what he is now, but market value), then packaged with Sergio Rodriguez and #55, #56.

Ronny Turiaf for Frye+Sergio+late 2nd or two would be good…

BUT, what about the rumors of Brandon Roy’s friendship with Jamal Crawford? He is very intriguing to me, I know he has a “bad” contract, but I could see Crawford filling any void created by Outlaw as a 2nd unit Scorer. What do u guys think….

by Portland Dynasty on Jun 9, 2009 8:03 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Crawford can score with the best of them

But there’s a reason he’s bounced around the league……..he’s a bit of a chucker.

Witty Unpredictable Talent and Natural Game

by iDea on Jun 10, 2009 9:06 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I agree.

Crawford could fill an Outlaw void, they score at about the same efficiency with Crawford being a much, much, much better play maker and passer. Maybe Roy is pushing for Turiaf because he knows Golden State will want Crawford included in any deal.

"It’s always tough. Brandon Roy is one of my best friends and when he went to the playoffs (with Portland) I was just as excited as if I was playing. I told him ’I’m playing through you’ and I was up there supporting him and going to games. And this is the closest I’ve been now it’s time to win. You can do all the individual stuff but until you win you won’t get the credit you deserve."-Jamal Crawford

Roy is the best player in the world with the exception of Incarcerated Mike from Queensbridge .

by Nick Van Excellent on Jun 10, 2009 9:18 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

If we took on Crawford's contract

we better be getting #7 in the deal as well. Either that or Brandan Wright.

by as11osu on Jun 10, 2009 9:58 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

err....

how about that 2010 first rounder I included in that deal. Do we really want that #7 pick in this draft? I don’t. I’d rather give the youngsters (Rudy, Jerryd, Batum) this season to show us what we need then have assets in the future to do whatever with. THis offseason, Id much rather see strictly experienced players come onto this roster.

by Portland Dynasty on Jun 11, 2009 6:30 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I wouldn't bet against the Warriors making the playoffs

and thus, #7, especially when Blair and Jennings might be there is preferable to next years possibilities.

by as11osu on Jun 11, 2009 10:17 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

He is a horrible rebounder

He hustles and looks like he is doing something, but aside from blocking shots and waving a towel he gets a lot more credit for his comeback story than his actual game.

Guys… we want someone we can rely on to rebound in the 2nd unit alongside Joel, right? He is a bad rebounder and doesn’t have an offensive game but his hustle and cheering makes us love him.

But he isn’t very good… except at shot blocking.

LMA isn’t a good rebounder either, but he does a lot more than that. As a role playing backup PF, Turiaf should rebound.

Mortimer

by Mortimer on Jun 9, 2009 2:32 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

But in his favor

He will be totally fine playing sop up minute duty and happily wave a towel the rest of the time. And he’ll LOOK like he is doing something, so most people won’t complain.

You’ll get what ya get and he won’t be the focus of scrutiny and expectations not met.

M.

by Mortimer on Jun 9, 2009 2:37 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I like Ronnie and I think he is playing with Nic on the French team this year.

Having said that Bass is in the same price range with a much better all around game.

by southern oregon on Jun 9, 2009 3:10 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Bass

is streaky, inconsistent, and not nearly as good of an ‘energy’ guy as Turiaf. The reason I like Turiaf is he plays great help D, which we terribly need from our backup F spot now.

by darkhelmit54 on Jun 9, 2009 3:47 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Streaky AND inconsistent?!

It's = It Is
Its = Belongs to It

by 12sharks on Jun 10, 2009 9:42 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Brandon Bass is awesome...

he steps his game up when the games get bigger.

His Roland Rating the last two years has been +9.0 (11th in the NBA) and +8.8 (12th in the NBA).
http://www.82games.com/0708/playoffs/playoffs.htm

http://www.82games.com/0809/playoffs/08DAL10.HTM
http://www.82games.com/0708/playoffs/07DAL11A.HTM

He’s an excellent rebounder, can adequately defend both the PF position and the C position and is one of the very best big men in the whole of the NBA at shooting the mid range jumper eFG% = .454 (4th in the NBA Nowitzki, McDyess, and Gasol are the only ones that are better). This, or some other like offensive skill is a must for someone playing alongside Joel Przybilla.

He’s also only 24 years old which is over two years younger than Turiaf. Brandon Bass is also better on the boards than Turiaf, including being nearly twice as good on the offensive glass, which as with scoring ability, when paired with Przybilla is the priority (since Joel isn’t nearly as dominant on that end).

All and all, Brandon Bass is the perfect fit for the present and future of this basketball team. As for whether or not this team will be willing to wait to get him is another story entirely. I read an article recently that Dallas was interested in trading up in the draft to get Jordan Hill. I hope to god that’s true, and we save our free agent dollars to sign Mr. Bass, because I think that would finish off any need we’d have in the frontcourt for the next 5 years.

by as11osu on Jun 12, 2009 2:15 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yeah, I could see it

Inexpensive, hard worker, good locker room guy, physical player. If Brandon wants him, that’s good enough for me.

"Sasha? That's a sissy name." -Mike Rice

by koyote on Jun 9, 2009 3:15 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

$4.5 million for a back up?

I can’t see the Blazers spending that kind of money on a player that would just fill a back-up role. I’d much rather see the team spend that money on a guy that could impact the team in a much larger way.

by royforprez on Jun 9, 2009 3:26 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

But that is backup money

You are very lucky if you are paying a starter that much. $4.5-6 million for a player in the regular rotation, especially a big man, is a very good deal if the player does what you need.

We’re lucky Blake and Joel are so cheap; Outlaw as well. I’d have no problems with $5~ million for a backup big, and I’d feel rather lucky if we got that deal (and the guy was decent).

Morty

by Mortimer on Jun 9, 2009 4:13 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Si.

"The Edge... there is no honest way to explain it because the only people who really know where it is are the ones who have gone over."

by GonzoFan on Jun 9, 2009 5:51 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

that's the point "regular rotation" if outlaw isn't moved then the back up four doesn't necessarily have minutes as part of the regular rotation.

Truth never was or can be propagated by fire and sword - Albert Gallatin

Bayless sucks! Trade him; or at least stop the annoying bayless homerism. his best case is gilbert arenas which is something the blazers don't want and don't need. He was a KP mistake.

by Zaron5551 on Jun 9, 2009 8:10 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I'd be fine with Turiaf

But I’d rather have a vet to help add some court awareness and mentorship for our other young guys.

I like the thought of Dyess and KThomas the best. I think a package of Ime/KThomas would be a great vet boost for our locker room (as long as we had high potential youth behind them, though Ime would probably be third string anyways).

I would however go Outlaw/Bayless for Turiaf/#7 in a heartbeat.

by darkhelmit54 on Jun 9, 2009 3:41 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

provided there was someone

that KP really really wanted at #7.

I wonder if we could finagle our way into Rubio from there, or get Curry or Jennings from there.

Those three are much different players, but all have great court vision.

It would be KP-esque to trade for Turiaf/7 then trade #7(Curry) and Sergio to NY for #8(Jennings?) and a future first perhaps. We could then use our cap space to sign Andre Miller still.

Miller/Jennings (maybe Blake)
Roy/Fernandez
Webster/Batum
Aldridge/Turiaf
Oden/Pryzbilla

with Koponen/Freeland/Beaubois/Casspi? overseas. I could live with that.

by darkhelmit54 on Jun 9, 2009 3:46 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

second unit

might need a little help on offense, but how often are all five of them on the floor at the same time anyways? Rudy would get to be the man again.

by darkhelmit54 on Jun 9, 2009 3:49 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Why are we thinking the Warriors would give up their #7 pick?

I wouldn’t give up Bayless for a #7 pick in this draft… even if one doesn’t like him, he’s worth more than that this year.

Morty

by Mortimer on Jun 9, 2009 4:15 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I don't think

very many people on a general board would agree with you on that one.

by darkhelmit54 on Jun 9, 2009 4:32 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I don't think we're talking about fans impatience

I mean, we’d be comparing Bayless to a rookie, so impatience really has nothing to do with this.

It’s about being objective. And most fans of the team just aren’t.

Personally my opinion would strictly come down to where Brandon Jennings goes. I think he’s the better point guard prospect by a couple of degrees, and I’d rather have him as my project than Bayless.

That said, I don’t know if Turiaf is worth Outlaw to me. I think Outlaw has more value than just getting Turiaf, although upgrading point guards would have value in itself too. Jennings would also be signed on the cheap for an extra year (a definite bonus).

by as11osu on Jun 10, 2009 5:02 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

So which are you arguing for

Moving Bayless for the #7 pick in a weak draft, or not?

I don’t think the average fan is clamoring for that, nor the front office. I doubt we’d wanna move Bayless and get someone who also isn’t a PG, is smaller, and less experienced.

The Blazers seem happy with what they got in Bayless, not eager for another project. He’d be moved for an upgrade, if anything, not a similar type of player.

Mortimer

by Mortimer on Jun 9, 2009 4:42 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

not eager for another project

you got that right

"Nate has taken on so many young guys the last couple of years," Pritchard said. "At a point in time, you can’t focus on development anymore; you have to focus on being successful. I would rather not add four rookies again."

http://www.portlandtribune.com/sports/story.php?story_id=124418073755700200

by two4larue on Jun 9, 2009 5:03 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

No coach wants to add 4 rookies...

that quote just states the obvious. Adding one supremely talented rookie this year would be another story altogether.

Just like last year 3 of our 4 rookies deserved their time on the court, a new guy this year most likely would as well.

by as11osu on Jun 10, 2009 5:04 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Adding one supremely talented rookie this year would be another story

Depends if that rookie is a PG or a PF. Nate has been developing rookie PGs for 4 years now (Jack, Sergio, Bayless) Maybe he deserves a year “off”?

KP sounds like he’s hitching his wagon to Bayless, for at least the next calendar year. You could be right about Jennings, Collison, et al. We’ll see on June 25th

by two4larue on Jun 10, 2009 3:32 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Brandon Jennings

isn’t a PG? Are you kidding me? His shot is off (like Bayless) BUT he is a pure pure PG who has more court vision in his pinky than in Bayless’ whole body.

by darkhelmit54 on Jun 9, 2009 8:51 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Jennings is definitely a PG.

He has really good court vision from what I’ve seen. He’s also become increasingly underrated in this draft. The guy broke Carmelo Anthony’s scoring record at Oak Hill Academy, averaging 32.7 points, 7.5 assists, 5.1 rebounds and 3.7 steals per game. It’s not like he got worse by playing professionally overseas either. If anything he’s a more mature player who puts a greater emphasis on defense and team play. I think he’s the second best PG in the draft and has a good chance to end up being the best player in the draft when all is said and done.

Having said all that, I still think Bayless is a million times better NBA prospect. His defensive potential + his ability to draw fouls makes him unique. His work ethic, which is apparently the best on the team, makes him a freaking monster. He’s a virtual lock to be a serviceable backup and his ceiling is in some weird place I’ve never seen before.

Take Monta Ellis, then make him bigger, stronger, a lock-down defender, better three point shot, incredible work ethic, and a serial killers instinct. That’s where I see his ceiling. Considering the fact that KP called him the hardest worker he’s ever been around, I think it’s possible he actually makes it there.

Roy is the best player in the world with the exception of Incarcerated Mike from Queensbridge .

by Nick Van Excellent on Jun 10, 2009 4:13 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Wow...

Meet the actual Jerryd Bayless:

Poor defender, constantly out of position, committing a ridiculous ridiculous amount of fouls for a point guard, poor wingspan for defense, can’t shoot any shot to save his life, mid range or 3 point, isn’t an actual point guard, poor passing and overall vision.

Work ethic is great, Sergio supposedly had the best work ethic on the entire team the year prior. Work ethic is what people talk about when they don’t want to talk about your actual game (see Sergio the year he struggled). KP can’t speak of any of Jerryd’s actual skills or contributions, because they just aren’t there yet. This best case scenario / ceiling you speak of is so beyond what’s in the realm of reality.

I hope that Jerryd is able to improve, but to stake any kind of claim

his ceiling is in some weird place I’ve never seen before.
on this kid being that guy is just unreasonable at this point.

Brandon Jennings is an actual point guard, is already a better defender, is already the better athlete, is already the better longer more talented player. His shot and scoring ability is every bit what Jerryd’s is, only in an actual point guards mindset.

Saying this in comparison to Jennings is outrageous…

Having said all that, I still think Bayless is a million times better NBA prospect.

Things we have to assume for Jerryd Bayless to be a franchise point guard:
- Does a 180 in regards to his mentality as a player.
- Learns to shoot both mid range shots and 3 point shots at a high level (and not a pitiful level)
- Learns better defensive positioning, become less aggressive, grow in length (never happen)
- Learns to run an offense for the first time in his life at a high level (and not a pitiful level)
- Learns to pass the ball as a first option and not a last option
- Figures out proper angles and where to properly pass people the ball

Things we have to realize as facts about last year. Sergio Rodriguez was MUCH better than him last year as a basketball player.

I swear when people hear the term “work ethic” they lose sight of reality. It’s great that he works out, but I think any of these guys as our point guard are going to be doing that. Here’s a quote about Jennings

Trajkovic said that Jennings was a hard worker. He said Jennings was a quick study and that the improvement he made in the first few months was dramatic…

http://insider.espn.go.com/nba/draft2009/insider/columns/story?columnist=ford_chad&page=brandonjennings-090609

by as11osu on Jun 10, 2009 4:49 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

the grow in length part is too much

I stand by the rest of it….

It’s important for me to note, that I still like him (Bayless) as a prospect, I just think he’s got a lower ceiling than Jennings and has a lower chance of reaching that ceiling as well.

Aside from Rubio and Jennings I’d take Bayless over any of the other point guard prospects this year (and that’s saying something).

by as11osu on Jun 10, 2009 5:12 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Brandon Jennings… is already a better defender, is already the better athlete, is already the better longer more talented player. His shot and scoring ability is every bit what Jerryd’s is, only in an actual point guards mindset.

I think you got all these dead wrong. Bayless has a better shot regardless what his garbage time NBA stats say (I would bet the life of my first born child on it), but calling Jennings a better defender is what’s really weirding me out. I’ve never heard him described as anything but a poor defender.

Brandon Jenning’s Weaknesses Via Draft Express
- Decision making
- Dominant ball-handler
- Efficiency
- Out of control at times
- Shot-selection
- Ability to fight through screens
- Activity level
- Commitment to playing defense
- Man to man defense
- Academic issues?
- Leadership skills
- Not ready to contribute immediately
- Not productive enough
- Average size
- Upper body strength
- Poor rebounder
- 3-point shooting percentages
- Ability to catch and shoot
- Low shooting percentages

Does that sound like a guy who is even a remotely good defender? Size issues, weak man to man defender, lack of commitment to playing defense, inability to fight through screens? That sounds horrible, and the few times I’ve seen Jennings play those descriptions all seemed pretty accurate. Hopefully playing overseas has helped, but it hasn’t magically made him a better defensive prospect than Bayles. Pure crazy talk.

The big one-up he’s got on Bayless is his court vision and overall ability to play the point. That’s pretty huge for most teams, but the Blazers not as much. Roy dominates the ball and will probably continue to do so regardless if we have a pure point or not.

Things we have to realize as facts about last year. Sergio Rodriguez was MUCH better than him last year as a basketball player.

That’s sort of a funny thing to say considering how unsettled the backup PG position has been all year. If Sergio was so much better, then why was Bayless (a rookie) breathing down his neck for most of the year? This was 67 games into the season.

Trail Blazers coach Nate McMillan on Tuesday said the team’s backup point guard position remains an unsettled situation, despite his move to play rookie Jerryd Bayless on Monday against Memphis while sitting Sergio Rodriguez for the first time all season. It appears that McMillan intends to use Bayless for mostly defensive purposes, when he needs a body to stay in front of a speedy point guard. And it appears he intends to use Rodriguez with the second unit now that Rudy Fernandez has worked his way back from injury. Earlier this season, when Bayless started making more of a push for playing time in practice, McMillan said he would not play mind games with his point guards by flip-flopping them in and out of the backup spot.-Jason Quick

Saying Sergio proved himself to be MUCH better than Bayless is nothing but revisionist history. Bayless briefly snatched the backup PG spot with only 15 games left in the season, which obviously wouldn’t happen if Sergio was clearly the better player.

Roy is the best player in the world with the exception of Incarcerated Mike from Queensbridge .

by Nick Van Excellent on Jun 10, 2009 5:55 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Sergio was better all year

because he had to be better all year. If it was even remotely close, Bayless would’ve had the job by default. It would’ve behooved the team to play Bayless more from all kinds of perspectives including his own development. He never took the job away from Sergio, even though everyone and their mom wanted him to. He just was never as good as Sergio. The numbers indicate much of the same in a more emphatic way.

by as11osu on Jun 10, 2009 6:04 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

In regards to Jennings versus Bayless defensively

it might not be fair because I’ve seen so much more of Bayless sucking than I’ve seen of Jennings sucking, so that kind of goes as a strike against Bayless. As far as the size and length are concerned, for the future of the team, I’d bet money on Jennings being the guy we’d be better off with on the defensive end. He’s much quicker and longer, and that’s kind of the important aspect that we lack right now in point guard defense. We don’t need someone perfectly adept at stopping bigger point guards, as those aren’t the types of players we struggled against. The whole reason we need a point guard, or at least as much as anything else, is that Roy nor Rudy can defend the exceptionally quick and fast point guards around the league. If everyone in the league had Chauncey Billups, Brandon Roy would be a more capable defender, and we might even be able to get away not having a guy that technically is a point guard. The type of defender we lack isn’t the physical (overly so) guy that is tough to go through, but the quick long defender that is hard to get around. Brandon Jennings at least in theory (pretty much both are at this point) is the type of defensive point guard you want on your team.

To be fair, DX also listed Bayless only positive on the defensive end as his commitment to playing on that end. His weaknesses included not being a true point guard, stuck between positions, ability to defend the position at the next level, his average wingspan, his size for the position and the fact he was undersized (yes, they listed those both).

DX lists Jennings positive as his ability to jump passing lanes. An actual particular ability. Not the idea that he could someday play (which he hasn’t shown).

Same deal with ESPN, as they only listed defense as a negative in regards to Bayless. ESPN this year lists Jennings as being a dangerous ball thief as his positive and being a defensive gambler as his negative.

ESPN in regards to Jennings also lists that he has NBA 3 point range and an excellent jump shot. ESPN listed last year that Bayless was a good jump shooter and that he got excellent elevation on his jump shots.

Again, I think it has to do with the fact I thought Bayless was going to be better than he was last year, and he never turned out that way. I think they were essentially equal prospects (Bayless last year and Jennings this year), but the difference is Jerryd’s stock has gone down since then, not much, but legitimately some.

by as11osu on Jun 10, 2009 6:27 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Honestly, I love Brandon Jennings. In fact one of my first posts on Blazers Edge (under a different name) was about how I thought Jennings could be our PG of the future, which was silly because he was still in high-school at the time.

I’ve read a lot of stuff that’s that’s encouraging about his progress as a player in Europe and I’ve seen enough with my own eyes to be a believer. What I don’t understand is how you can be high on Rubio and Jennings who both have god awful stats (in a weaker league no less) and still criticize Bayless based on his shooting percentages and whatnot. Bayless was a fantastic shooter in College and suddenly became a poor shooter in the NBA. Jennings is a poor shooter in Europe, but I don’t see him suddenly becoming good in the pros.

Anyway, I would be into the Blazers moving up and grabbing Jennings more than someone like Curry, Lawson, or even Rubio given the cost. He’s already a more all around player than Sergio and he has better hair to boot. Given his potential I think it might be worth taking a chance.

Every time I saw Jennings, he really competed on the defensive end – his quickness allowed him to be a pest even if his inexperience caused him to struggle in the pick-and-roll. As much as anything, I was impressed at how professional the kid was, at how mature he looked – there was no pouting, no self-indulgent individualism on display.-the Painted Area

Roy is the best player in the world with the exception of Incarcerated Mike from Queensbridge .

by Nick Van Excellent on Jun 10, 2009 6:59 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

The last couple years KP has agreed quite a bit with my player assessments

or at least his drafting record has, so I’m hopeful. The thing I find disturbing is his constant praise of both Bayless and Blake. If you have all these assets going into this offseason, and you’re not willing to upgrade your biggest hole (point guard) what exactly are you expecting to do?

At best, the rest of the positions we can make small upgrades at, yet point guard, a place that can be significantly improved, he seems awfully set in what we have. Maybe it’s all smokescreen, but I’m getting kind of worried.

I guess I could live with DeJuan Blair and Trevor Ariza or Brandon Bass and Austin Daye, but I still think you’re missing the boat, the year that missing the boat can’t happen.

Situation:
Plenty of valuable assets that are movable
Huge hole at point guard
= New Point Guard/s… or at least you would think.

by as11osu on Jun 10, 2009 7:23 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I agree with you there.

I would be angry if the PG spot doesn’t improve this year.

Roy is the best player in the world with the exception of Incarcerated Mike from Queensbridge .

by Nick Van Excellent on Jun 10, 2009 7:34 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

you’re not willing to upgrade your biggest hole (point guard)

I’d rather improve it from the top down, rather than the bottom up. The team is ready to win now, so upgrade the starting PG

KP traded up to draft a PG (Bayless) last year. You expect him to do it again a year later. I don’t

by two4larue on Jun 10, 2009 3:50 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I agree... that should be our goal

There are only a couple of guys that could be available, aren’t too old, and would be a significant enough jump to make the move happen.

Conley Jr
Hinrich
Calderon

I think Rubio would be better within a year, so he’d also be on this list for me.

by as11osu on Jun 10, 2009 4:55 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Maybe I'm thinking too small

but all those come with the opinion that LMA shouldn’t be moved.

Tony Parker, Devin Harris and Rajon Rondo are the rest of the list, but you have to assume LMA is being dealt away in all those moves, and I’m not jumping on that boat.

by as11osu on Jun 10, 2009 5:01 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Dwight Jaynes

Threw out the “LMA+ for CP3 then sign David Lee” idea this AM. There’s only a few guys I’d consider dealing LMA for, and CP3 is one of them.

Parker would be awfully tempting, so would Harris. Not as sold on Rondo being Roy’s sidekick

But you’d better be SURE you’ve got David Lee to play PF before dealing LMA. Even then, I like having LMA’s face-up game to complement Oden in years to come. Lee is more of a garbage man (off. rebounds and put backs, transition hoops, etc) So I’m not sure putting Lee alongside Oden or Przy would be as effective at the offensive end as LMA will be

by two4larue on Jun 10, 2009 6:24 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

You guys don’t really think you could get CP3 with LMA as the centerpiece in a deal do you?

Thing A

by sam23 on Jun 10, 2009 11:44 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I'm not a fan of Lee's game

but I see what you’re getting at. It is easier to find PF’s in this league than PG’s, that’s for sure.

by as11osu on Jun 11, 2009 1:11 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

As good as Rubio could be, and as soon as he might be ready to contribute

I don’t see him as someone KP is going to put a sizable deal together and go get. He would have to significantly adjust the roster (deal Rudy, and/or Batum, and/or Joel/Przy) just to get into the vicinity of where Ricky will be chosen on draft day.

Then you’ve got the “Nate breaking in another rookie PG” factor. And the “didn’t we just went through this with Sergio?” discussion between the coaching staff and scouts.

Yeah, Rubio’s good, and he’s probably gonna be awesome in the NBA. But I don’t see KP shaking everything up to bring him in…even though it would be ballsy.

by two4larue on Jun 10, 2009 6:36 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

OKC

who might have a shot at him, wouldn’t even have him as their priority. If you can get into the 4-7 range (which wouldn’t be too difficult), and add in a player or two, you could probably pry him away.

by as11osu on Jun 11, 2009 1:14 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

except that Sac is rumored to love him

Thing A

by sam23 on Jun 11, 2009 2:34 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

That's why you're trading ahead of them

as I just talked about (getting a pick in the top 7 or so and adding a player).

by as11osu on Jun 11, 2009 2:38 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

?

Sac has the 4th pick

Thing A

by sam23 on Jun 11, 2009 2:49 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

And OKC has the 3rd pick

thus Portland trading above Sac to get OKC’s pick.

by as11osu on Jun 11, 2009 2:51 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

oh I see, get into the 4-7 range first and THEN trade that pick to OKC with another player?

Thing A

by sam23 on Jun 11, 2009 2:53 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Correct...

sorry for the confusion

by as11osu on Jun 11, 2009 2:53 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

No

my fault, I didn’t read thoroughly enough

Thing A

by sam23 on Jun 11, 2009 2:56 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Also... did you just say Rubio had god awful stats?

Rubio age 18 versus grown men in Europe – PER 20.5 (#1 PG in the ACB league)

Bayless age 19 versus like aged kids – PER 23.7 (#15 PG in NCAA’s)

Rubio is destroying the rest of his league with the stats he’s putting up.

by as11osu on Jun 10, 2009 7:33 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yes I did.

He’s shooting a pretty poor percentage overall. Statistically he’s just any average finisher, which does not bode well for the NBA. He turns the ball over a lot, etc.

He is just not a good shooter and that’s going to be a problem for a lot of teams. It was just reported that he doesn’t want to go to the Wizards because he feels he needs the ball in his hands to be effective and he can’t do that playing next to a combo guard like Gilbert. That sort of makes me feel nervous about sticking him next to Roy.

“Rubio’s perimeter shooting remains very much a concern, as highlighted by the 0-4 he shot in this particular game. He is shooting 42% from beyond the arc on the season thus far, but that’s on a very small sample size (8/19). His mechanics still look poor, and he’s especially dreadful shooting the ball off the dribble—which is a big reason why he was forced to pass the ball in the game’s decisive possession (resulting in two free throws for Eduardo Hernandez Sonseca, one of which he fatally missed) rather than try to score himself.”-Draft Express

 

Roy is the best player in the world with the exception of Incarcerated Mike from Queensbridge .

by Nick Van Excellent on Jun 10, 2009 7:53 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

He's improved his shooting since then

he’s at 22/52 right now which is 42.3% from 3. He takes one every 9.7 minutes which isn’t too far off from Blake’s rate every 6.6 minutes. I really questioned his shot as well, but he’s really eased the only concern I’ve had about his game. I’m sure that would be an even better number if he got to take the kinds of 3’s that Roy and hopefully Oden someday should get you on this team.

by as11osu on Jun 10, 2009 8:44 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

You are comparing a Jennings who doesn't yet exist (NBA player) to a Bayless who does but could have had the worst year of his NBA career

Bayless e.g. had a working 3 point and long-range shot in college. Why is it not possible he finds that again when you think Jennings can? Then he instantly becomes a very dangerous guard when defenders can’t sag off him to defend the drive, and he is stronger going to the rim than most others already. It wasn’t a coincidence why he was high on draft boards and got comparisons to very good players (incl. his draft classmates Rose and Westbrook) by scouts and basketball executives.

Who knows through what struggles Jennings will go next year, depending on where he goes in the draft and on which team he lands (DX has him on 13, about where Bayless ended up). He was a very selfish scorer in high school, and I agree his year in Italy has helped him get away from that quite a bit making him focus more on assisting and defense. He is a better player than he was a year ago even if some team don’t seem to see that. But his efficiency and shooting percentages in Italy playing against pros were bad, on a level with Bayless playing in the NBA bad. So who knows who is the better prospect.

by Norsktroll on Jun 10, 2009 9:34 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

There are two questions here...

Which is going to be better?

Which is going to be the better fit?

In my opinion the answer to both of those questions is Jennings.

Shooting and defense you can argue either side of, although there are definitive differences in how and where they take their shots from.

What can’t be argued are their strengths as players. Bayless is one of the best point guards you’ll ever see around the bucket as far as finishing is concerned. Jennings is one of the most electrifying players you’ll ever see that is an elite playmaker.

When I look this team’s eventual starting lineup, with Brandon, Batum, LMA and Oden, I see a bunch of guys that are going to be fantastic options for a point guard like Jennings. His ability to get easy looks both inside and from three land for his teammates trumps Jerryd’s ability to score himself. I don’t see scoring from your point guard as a priority except perhaps from behind the arch when Roy turns into our closer. As far as which of these guys will better fit that role only time will tell. But as for the rest of it, I like the way Jennings would fit more than Bayless long term starting with our core. Brandon can’t be the only guy that can control the ball and get open looks for our extremely talented bigs and Batum. Jennings would take a lot of pressure off of Roy at all points in the game.

by as11osu on Jun 10, 2009 9:56 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Dang

why didn’t I think of that.

by as11osu on Jun 11, 2009 12:11 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Wow

Lets not judge anyone based on limited action in they’re first year in the league. Learning a new position and playing inconsistant minutes while at the same time totally changing shot mechanics while we’re at it.

If we judged everyone based on a small sample size their rookie year Sergio would be the next John Stockton.

* Building a Greg Oden Fanboy Treehouse Clubhouse this summer...

by OdenFanBoy on Jun 11, 2009 4:19 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

+ 1

     BRex didn’t get enough minutes to show his stuff. Let’s see
what he can do with 20 min as the backup PG before we make a
any decisions. Great intensity, workaholic and a physical specimen.
PATIENCE !!!

It's GO time !

by walkoff41 on Jun 10, 2009 11:19 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

What is there to not "like" about Bayless.

1.) We really haven’t really seen him play consistent minutes. When he filled in for Blake, Jerryd electrified the Rose Garden with his cross-overs and dunks.
2.) Jerryd Bayless is a totally dedicated professional athlete who is focused on training and improving.
3.) Jerryd was a lottery pick who didn’t bitch at all to the media about the situation he was in. Coach made a decision that was “best” for the team (i.e. Sergio had 3 years experience and knew the plays), and it is clear that GM is making the next decision to clear the way for Bayless to get those consistent minutes and show us what he has as a 20 year old pg prospect.

Honestly is you consider yourself a Blazer Fan and DON’T want to give Jerryd Bayless, a very popular pick just a year ago, a little bit of time to develop into an NBA player because you don’t “like” him…. you gotta take a deep breathe and re-evaluate your negative vibes… Giving up on someone before they have had their deserved chance is bad kharma.

by Portland Dynasty on Jun 11, 2009 10:43 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Orrrr...

1.) We really haven’t really seen him play consistent minutes. When he filled in for Blake, Jerryd electrified the Rose Garden with his cross-overs and dunks.
Bayless had 4-5 good games out of a span of 15 with regular minutes.

2.) Jerryd Bayless is a totally dedicated professional athlete who is focused on training and improving.
90% of the NBA fits this description.

3.) Jerryd was a lottery pick who didn’t bitch at all to the media about the situation he was in. Coach made a decision that was "best" for the team (i.e. Sergio had 3 years experience and knew the plays), and it is clear that GM is making the next decision to clear the way for Bayless to get those consistent minutes and show us what he has as a 20 year old pg prospect.
Bayless was a “lottery” pick in name only. Also, he was supposed to go 4 and dropped to 10. There’s a reason for this I’d wager. Bayless doesn’t seem to talk to anyone at all. (Even when Webster strikes up a convo in the looker room.) This sounds like a player who is too intense and won’t mesh well with his teammates.

It’s really easy to find positives or negatives in the same traits for the same guy.

by Zaig on Jun 11, 2009 2:13 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Not really, you don't really make points...

you are just giving tidbits that you feel draw concrete conclusions…. small-minded thinking….

by Portland Dynasty on Jun 11, 2009 6:33 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I did the exact same thing you did

I just looked at it from the other side of things. If I didn’t make any points, then neither did you.

by Zaig on Jun 12, 2009 2:06 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Good point.

I like Bayless better then the 7 in this draft too. It would be stupid to trade him before we can even see what he can do with minutes.

Most of us can agree he has the talent to be a star in this league. Unleash Rex.

* Building a Greg Oden Fanboy Treehouse Clubhouse this summer...

by OdenFanBoy on Jun 10, 2009 12:32 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I wouldn't trade Bayless for the #7 either

So there.

This is a weak draft and there really isn’t a player at 7 who has more potential than Bayless. If Bayless had stayed in school another year and was in this draft, there’s a good chance he’d be a top 5 pick.

Witty Unpredictable Talent and Natural Game

by iDea on Jun 10, 2009 9:10 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Hell

He was supposed to be a top 5 pick LAST draft, in a good draft.

I know he has his detractors and I’ll just let Bayless prove whether he is good on his own, but to think he isn’t worth more than the #7 pick in a weak-butt draft is crazy talk. RAVENOUS LUNACY.

Mortimer

by Mortimer on Jun 10, 2009 11:54 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Depends on who is on the board at #7

there was a reason he went where he did (#11), and his first year in the league didn’t help that.

by as11osu on Jun 10, 2009 12:49 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I don't think there is anything either of us could say to dissuade the other about Bayless

I just know he was very high up on most people’s draft boards, and a bad season for a 19 year old kid on a good team doesn’t mean as much as you might think it does.

Yes, it does depend who is on the board at #7, but only if 2 players in this draft fall down to #7. No one else has the same potential (but that is not something I expect you to agree on, so don’t worry, you don’t need to refute it).

I do not think it likely Griffin or Rubio fall down to #7, and Thabeet and Friends don’t get my blood going. Bayless would have had an even better season than his Freshman year most likely, and been a very highly ranked guard going into this draft, what with his size and ELITE athleticism.

Even without a 2nd good season under his belt, I am sure he is a better player after a year of coaching and training and development with an NBA staff as good as ours. I don’t see anyone after the two I’ve mentioned who are worth giving that up for, straight across.

I know you disagree, so I’m just expounding upon where I am coming from.

Mortimer

by Mortimer on Jun 10, 2009 3:19 PM PDT up reply actions   1 recs

????

Why would you trade a player and the 7th pick for the 8th pick?

"The Edge... there is no honest way to explain it because the only people who really know where it is are the ones who have gone over."

by GonzoFan on Jun 9, 2009 5:52 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Nevermind.

Didn’t comprehend the “and a future first round pick”. But that almost tips the scale completely the other way, doesn’t it?

"The Edge... there is no honest way to explain it because the only people who really know where it is are the ones who have gone over."

by GonzoFan on Jun 9, 2009 5:53 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Depends

on how much the Knicks want Curry

by darkhelmit54 on Jun 9, 2009 8:52 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

ask Pritchard

he did it with Roy/Foye

by darkhelmit54 on Jun 9, 2009 8:52 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

the think is with ronnie

he has finals experience

bayless leaves over my dead body
sign mike bibby

by thomasikehara on Jun 9, 2009 5:50 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

So McDyess is better again.

No offense, no rebounding is worrisome (neither need to be stellar, just existent).

by staylost on Jun 9, 2009 5:57 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Bring in Turiaf!

Sure, I may be biased, but so what?

The inbound to McGinnis, drives, stops, pumps, shoots, short, no good...AND THE GAME IS OVER! ~ Bill Schonely

by SandbergOnSports on Jun 9, 2009 3:45 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

I like Turiaf

He’s a solid backup player in the NBA. One issue is that his best skill is shotblocking (2nd only to Birdman in that category adjusting for pt and pace) and that’s a skill someone duplicated on the Blazers. I think there might be better options out there, but make no mistake, Ronny Turiaf has a reasonable contract and can be a rotation player on a good team.

by jksnake99 on Jun 9, 2009 3:50 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

+1

Good work little brother…

by Portland Dynasty on Jun 9, 2009 10:43 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

perfect back up option

The Princess of Blazersedge

by BlazerFan1 on Jun 9, 2009 3:54 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Great choice.

And for those Mcdyess lovers, he’d be good as well.

Oden and LaMarcus and Roy, oh my!

by Quik_Baller on Jun 9, 2009 4:00 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Casey has a good take on the "Roy approves of whoever" rumors
It’s a story tailor made for the internet: short on facts, long on speculation.

by Norsktroll on Jun 9, 2009 4:04 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Maybe

but Turiaf would be a nice pickup. 26, smart, high skill level, tough, speaks French. Sensible choice for the long haul.

by oregonslee on Jun 9, 2009 5:30 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Hah.

Speeks French is a must on my draft board.

* Building a Greg Oden Fanboy Treehouse Clubhouse this summer...

by OdenFanBoy on Jun 10, 2009 12:35 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

He and Nicolas can be the new

French Connection. We would have the Spanish Armada and the French Connection. The Rose Garden will be like the cirque du soleil every game. We can watch the French national team on the big screen between home games. It’s going to be very good.

by oregonslee on Jun 10, 2009 5:49 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

+1 Cirque Du Soleil

Or to the rednecks: Circdus Ole….

“Circdus Ole? Why would I want to go to a Mexican Circus?” — Redneck

“Uh, it’s French, Shakespear” — Me

Yes, that is an actual conversation I had with a Redneck while in a Las Vegas bar….

by Portland Dynasty on Jun 11, 2009 10:48 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

how again is turiaf>outlaw?

everyone who wants to get a backup PF needs to show why they deserve that spot more than outlaw. I know he left a bad taste in everyone’s mouth in the playoffs but outlaw>turiaf.

Please, for the love of all that is holy, please stop using the following: "Book it.", "FTW", "Epic" & "Fail".

...no seriously--stop.

by nima on Jun 9, 2009 5:39 PM PDT reply actions   2 recs

Personally I think the trade Outlaw crowd is way overboard.

I would really prefer not to have to trade that guy. But even though you are correct, would a worse player who offers us the specifics we need be preferable to a better guy who has a bunch of redundent skills?

How do Turiaf and Outlaw compare at rebounding?

by staylost on Jun 9, 2009 6:00 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

i know we had problems on the boards in the past but last year weren't we a pretty good rebounding team?

playoffs aside (where we were out of position from doubling yao all day) weren’t we good at it? isn’t turiaf more redundant then?!

Please, for the love of all that is holy, please stop using the following: "Book it.", "FTW", "Epic" & "Fail".

...no seriously--stop.

by nima on Jun 10, 2009 5:59 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I'm not sure Turiaf is "the answer"

But there’s no doubt the Blazers need more toughness and physicality at the backup 4 than they got from Frye/Outlaw last year

Both in the regular season and especially in the playoffs

It’s not all about the rebounding numbers, either. Sure, Portland had great rebounding stats during the regular season. But in the 4th quarter of game 4 down in Houston they got outrebounded 11-2 down the stretch in a game they lost by a point. Just one more bleeping defensive “stop” in that quarter and we have a game 7 and a likely trip to round 2!

The ideal PF to backup LMA needs to be a banger.
An above-average defensive rebounder.
Able to hit an open jumper out to 15 feet.
Have playoff experience (finals, if possible)
and be willing to play short minutes during the regular season, then kick some butt in the post season.

That won’t be easy to find, all in one player. But that’s who KP needs to acquire this offseason

by two4larue on Jun 10, 2009 6:48 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Well

I am so damn sick of pretending Joel Pryzbilla is Dwight Howard and surrounding him with four guys on the perimeter (of them Rudy is the only one who follows his shot). Outlaw does good things against players bigger and slower than him because his leaping ability neutralizes their size. However, on defense he is TERRIBLE and greatly contributes to our guys getting in foul trouble.

Travis is an asset 50% of the time (when his shot is on) but he still gives up a lot on team D, but when his shot is off – worthless.

by darkhelmit54 on Jun 9, 2009 8:55 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

he'd be a near-perfect fit

*energy
*physicality
*attitude
*youth
*great teammate, by all accounts
*reasonable price tag

‘energy guys’ on opposing teams are often the easiest to hate (especially on the l*kers), but it certainly wouldn’t hurt to have somebody firing up our boys… especially if it translates into even just one iota of visible attitude/toughness from greg.

by dr chapstick on Jun 9, 2009 7:18 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

I'd pay him a little more than he's worth

if he agree’d to get surgery… he’s so freaking ugly.

One Team to Rule Them All

by In Walks Rudy on Jun 9, 2009 7:41 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Every week people would be calling in saying they saw sasquatch.

We would all be hiding in our basements thinking sasquatch had really returned, and it would be special monster coverage 24 hours a day by the news channels. We’d never be able to watch a game!
It would be a disaster if he came to Portland.

by staylost on Jun 9, 2009 7:52 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

The Majority of us are Guys...

Why do we have to factor in the looks of a player?

Sabas looked like a big friendly ogre. That doesn’t mean he couldent ball.

* Building a Greg Oden Fanboy Treehouse Clubhouse this summer...

by OdenFanBoy on Jun 10, 2009 12:41 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

/sarcasm off

I agree quite completely, but some people here are not content with just Rudy, LMA, and Batum on our team. They appear to want to remove KP and make the GQ staff our general managers.

Our new slogan will be “Blazers: It will Rise when You see Us!” or just “Move up to a more mature fascination now that you’ve outgrown boybands.”

by staylost on Jun 10, 2009 6:59 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

HAH!

Awesome Slogan. But seriously Nate needs to repeal the headband ban.

* Building a Greg Oden Fanboy Treehouse Clubhouse this summer...

by OdenFanBoy on Jun 11, 2009 5:23 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Audie Norris

Nicknamed “The Atomic Dog” Blazer playoff hero

Calvin Natt was no kewpie doll, either

by two4larue on Jun 10, 2009 4:01 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

So if we offered

Outlaw, Sergio the #24 for Turiaf and the #7, would GS go for that???

Then what would it take along witht the #7 to get up to #2? Would the #7 and Bayless get us the #2 and take on a bad contract like Darko or Jaric?

This would be a great draft day.

by utblazer on Jun 9, 2009 8:43 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

No
Outlaw, Sergio the #24 for Turiaf and the #7, would GS go for that???

"A bizarre and extremely rare hybrid Blazer/Laker fan, Timbo has always struggled to contain the Beast Within, like Dr. Jekyll, Bruce Banner, or Ted Kennedy." — Miled Animal

by timbo on Jun 9, 2009 10:17 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

keep dreaming man haha

Gerald Madkins

by gorillas on Jun 9, 2009 10:38 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yea just throw in Roy and you’ve got a deal.

Thing A

by sam23 on Jun 9, 2009 11:14 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

...crickets...

"Sasha? That's a sissy name." -Mike Rice

by koyote on Jun 10, 2009 12:05 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

There’s simply nothing you guys would be willing to give up that would convince us to give up Turiaf. Blake or Outlaw or Sergio or various other little pieces aren’t gonna cut it, and Ronny isn’t worth what we’d want from you guys. Nice thought, but its just not happening.

Thing A

by sam23 on Jun 9, 2009 11:13 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

So Turiaf is your Rudy?

Fans love him? Sells tickets? Works hard without the ball?
That is our Fernandez… we REALLY like him.

Why do you think he looks so poor on the rebounding front? Are we wrong or does he really struggle there?

Will you please stop trashing us when we go to your homecourt; we are supposed to be improving, ya know?

by staylost on Jun 9, 2009 11:51 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yea the fans love him and we went without ONE decent center for so long that having two quality guys capable of playing center kinda makes a lot of fans feel like we’re rolling around in a bed full of money. On top of that he seems to be a really decent dude and nobody looks like they’re working harder on the basketball court than Turiaf.

No you’re certainly not wrong about him struggling on the boards. I think its 2 things: 1. He chases the block on defense so much that it gets him moving away from the hoop or in the air as the shot is going up and 2. when he doesn’t chase the block he does seem to do a pretty good job of getting a body on his man and working for the board, he just doesn’t have great rebounding instincts like guys like Biedrins, Przybilla, and Randolph do. Personally I’d like to see Ronny sacrifice a little bit of his inflated blocks total to become better on the boards. Ronny is a better post defender than Biedrins, but because he doesn’t rebound as well and gives up extra possessions our D was actually statistically better with Biedrins in the game. But as long as Biedrins and Randolph are healthy and getting a lot of frontcourt minutes Ronny’s rebounding is really not much of a problem. Turiaf is a terrific backup big but, unlike you guys with Przy, its not like we carry on exactly the same if Biedrins goes down for a short stretch.

Trashing you guys? What do you mean?

Thing A

by sam23 on Jun 10, 2009 12:42 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

oh

I’d be happy to hand you guys a couple games if we could beat anyone else with any consistency.

Thing A

by sam23 on Jun 10, 2009 10:25 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

damn nellieball.

Its like Kryptonite to Roy’s Superman.

* Building a Greg Oden Fanboy Treehouse Clubhouse this summer...

by OdenFanBoy on Jun 11, 2009 5:31 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Turiaf actually flashes a fairly decent midrange J.

Thing A

by sam23 on Jun 10, 2009 12:43 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

not really

he’s got a 36% jumper going.

In other words, if you’re an opponent, getting the Blazers to use Turiaf at all on offense, and you’ve already won.

by as11osu on Jun 10, 2009 12:47 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Frye actually is decent offensively

I think his mid range game is over 40%. Defensively there’s a difference. I think we should be looking for a guy who can at least do some kind of scoring damage, because he’s going to be playing with Joel, and we’re going to need something from our front court.

by as11osu on Jun 11, 2009 1:17 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Turiaf is a good defender

but really isn’t very good on the boards (as he’s always going for blocks) and has no offensive game to speak of. He would be a decent fit next to Przybilla, definitely not perfect. Is there no way we can get a big that’s a banger with some sort of offensive game to go along with it?

by as11osu on Jun 10, 2009 12:31 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

I hear Zach Randolph is available. You guys should give that a try. ; )

Thing A

by sam23 on Jun 10, 2009 12:44 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Turiaf would fit

Why?

Cause Brandon Roy said so. Period.

Trade Outlaw straight up for Turiaf

Trade Sergio and picks for future first rounder

Sign Kidd, Miller, or Bibby

Kidd/Bayless/Blake
Roy/Rudy
Batum/Webster
LA/Turiaf
Oden/Pryz

Nice lineup, future stays flexible

"Tough times don't last. Tough people do."
-Chauncey Billups

by Kelsoballa on Jun 10, 2009 8:19 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Trade Outlaw straight up for Turiaf

Ha, no thanks you can keep Outlaw.

Thing A

by sam23 on Jun 10, 2009 10:24 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

+1 Brandon Roy Said So.

This is a bandwagon I am on 100%

by Portland Dynasty on Jun 11, 2009 10:51 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

It's like, why even discuss this... OMG?!

Brandon Roy said so. Duh, make it happen no questions asked.

Do what the man says for crying out loud… he is the centerpiece.

by Portland Dynasty on Jun 11, 2009 10:52 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Nobody has mentioned

that Turiaf is a lock for the Towel Waving Hall of Fame. Nobody on the bench has ever waved a towel quite like he does – like an art form born from air.

by T$ 225 on Jun 10, 2009 10:00 AM PDT reply actions   1 recs

Also adding another guy who can't throw the ball in the ocean for the loss...

I see one and a half scorers on this team. That’s a problem.

Blazer Fan

by leeroyjenkins on Jun 10, 2009 10:26 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I can't believe it....

LeeRoy thinks B.Roy sets his sights too low….

“Hey B.Roy, yeah this is LeeRoy Jenkins from BlazersEdge. How are you doing? Good man, I just wanted to say that this whole Ronny Turiaf idea… well you are wrong, that guy is a stiff and he would not be a good fit in the role that your team needs. Hello, hello…. I think I was hung up on?” — leeroyjenkins

show some Royspect.

by Portland Dynasty on Jun 11, 2009 10:56 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Umm

Roy’s job isn’t to scout talent. Roy has said nice things about pretty much every Washington player. (The state, not the college.)

by Zaig on Jun 11, 2009 2:19 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

make that two people who don't want to give Roy his Royspect...

It isn’t Roy’s job to scout talent, but the dude is on the court and leading this roster… why would he NOT have a solid idea of who would fit the need of his roster?

by Portland Dynasty on Jun 11, 2009 6:36 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

You're right

We should fire all of our scouts and our GM and everyone involved in that sort of stuff. OBVIOUSLY Roy should be the one creating our team for us.

by Zaig on Jun 12, 2009 2:08 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Good thing Roy isn't best friends with

Adam Morrison. Can you believe the ’stache is gonna get a ring before Brandon?

by two4larue on Jun 11, 2009 10:00 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I love Turiaf and he would be a good role player

with 4 other offensive threats on the floor. He’d be more effective with LMA or Oden on the floor, rather than Joel. But that kinda limits the options Nate has.

Honestly, I see a guy like McDyess or Kurt Thomas as a better fit, b/c they would be more effective with a guy like Joel on the floor on the offensive end. The perfect fit IMO would be bringing back Rasheed Wallace…but that will never happen.

by JasonT on Jun 10, 2009 12:38 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

He'd fit the back-up power forward bill

I’ve been hankering for a “Maxsap” for years now. Turiaf or McDyess would do the job. McDyess is the more talented player, but his knees are suspect and I believe he’s got more miles on him. Both are reputed high-character guys.

Listen to B-Roy, KP!

Of course, the Blazers need to make other moves this off-season. But Turiaf wouldn’t break the bank. I love Channing Frye, but come on: the Blazers have just got to get some physicality coming off the bench, and poor Diogu just can’t get it done.

"We don't back down to nobody." --Joel Przybilla

by hurryup09 on Jun 10, 2009 1:46 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

i've proposed this before

with the way i’d do it: http://games.espn.go.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=l9cama
but you’d have to give up the best backup C in the league to get him, and i think you’d see just how bad the perimeter d is on the PTB if joel left. Both oden and turiaf get in foul trouble because that are good at blocking shots which makes them think they can block every shot.

"The problem with tweeners is that sometimes they’re exactly what you need to plug the hole and sometimes they are the hole."

-LaughingJon

by appel82 on Jun 10, 2009 2:05 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

I can't give up Przy, Outlaw and Sergio

for Steven Jackson and Turiaf. Too rich for my blood. (throws in cards) – Elgin

VENTURA: It's drowning. It gives you the complete sensation that you are drowning. It is no good, because you -- I'll put it to you this way, you give me a waterboard, Dick Cheney and one hour, and I'll have him confess to the Sharon Tate murders.

by 22baylor on Jun 10, 2009 3:33 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

thats about the only kind of deal that would get it done, I really can’t imagine a more reasonable offer. Turiaf just isn’t really a feasible option for you guys unless you are willing to ship out Przy and/or take on a bad contract.

Thing A

by sam23 on Jun 10, 2009 11:41 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

You severely overrate Turiaf

Outlaw, Sergio, and 24 for Turiaf and 7 is too much, but that’s not because of Turiaf, that’s because of the picks.

Outlaw and Sergio for Turiaf would be a ridiculous trade for you guys to turn down, but I also think that KP isn’t dumb enough to offer it.

by Zaig on Jun 11, 2009 2:20 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Outlaw and Sergio for Turiaf would be a ridiculous trade for you guys to turn down

Sergio is an unproven guard who shoots terribly, turns the ball over a lot, and isn’t very good defensively. He might be good in an uptempo offense, but its definitely a gamble. Outlaw is a pretty good scorer, but a streaky scoring wing who doesn’t do anything else all that well is not exactly what the Warriors need. Turiaf’s game is limited, but he’s young, cheap and a quality backup big signed for several more seasons. Quality bigs are far more rare than streaky scoring wings or turnover prone PGs who can’t shoot. You’d have a hard time finding any Warrior fan who would think that was a good trade offer for us, and even our mess of a front office team wouldn’t make that deal. Throw in 24 for 7 and you’re just being ridiculous.

Thing A

by sam23 on Jun 11, 2009 2:46 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I don't think Golden State knows what Golden State needs

they’re just a mess at this point. They need to use their parts to go after a big name guy.

by as11osu on Jun 11, 2009 2:53 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I don’t think we have the parts to go after a big name guy. I think Monta, Randolph and Biedrins all have more value to the team right now than they would have in a trade and nobody else is going to get us a big name guy…..unless you mean sort of re-swapping Maggette for Baron

Thing A

by sam23 on Jun 11, 2009 2:55 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Heh

Where to start… you got some things right, and a ton wrong.

-Sergio turns the ball over less than some of the top PGs in the NBA, he’s a high risk high reward player.
-Outlaw is no more streaky than any other shooter. He’s 48% from inside the 3pt line. 37% from beyond it. This means his TS% is identical to Turiaf’s. The difference being that Outlaw can create his own shots and actually score.
-Outlaw is younger than Turiaf, so is Sergio. N
-Quality big? He blocks the crap out of the ball and he’s a decent passed for a big, but he doesn’t score or rebound the ball for crap.

Basically, Turiaf is similar to Outlaw, just on the other end of the floor. You overvalue Turiaf for the same reasons that Portland fans over value rudy. The only difference is that Rudy is a rookie and can actually improve still. Turiaf has improved his shotblocking and passing in the last couple years, while getting worse on the offensive side of the ball.

Basically, I wouldn’t trade Turiaf for Outlaw straight up right now.
Przybilla/Turiaf down low would have a pretty bad time scoring the ball.

by Zaig on Jun 11, 2009 3:07 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

-Sergio turns the ball over less than some of the top PGs in the NBA, he’s a high risk high reward player.

fine, but he doesn’t come with anywhere near the reward the top PGs in the league do. You guys generally seem to think PG is your biggest need……. why would that be the case if you were at all sold on Sergio?

Outlaw is no more streaky than any other shooter. He’s 48% from inside the 3pt line. 37% from beyond it. This means his TS% is identical to Turiaf’s. The difference being that Outlaw can create his own shots and actually score.

Maybe not any more streaky than your average shooter, but that still doesn’t solve any problem for us. How many teams in the league need another guy like Outlaw? Not very many. How many need another quality big? Just about all of them. Turiafs TS% may be similar to Outlaw’s but he’s incredibly more valuable.
-Outlaw is younger than Turiaf, so is Sergio.

My point was simply that Turiaf isn’t going to get any worse over the next few years, and its not as though he hurts the cap.
-Quality big? He blocks the crap out of the ball and he’s a decent passed for a big, but he doesn’t score or rebound the ball for crap.

Big guys who score are incredibly rare. Sure his rebounding deficiencies are concerning, but with Biedrins and Randolph as a very strong rebounding starting 4/5 its not a major concern for us. Certainly nothing that would make us want to trade him for a 2 guys like Rodriguez and Outlaw. Looking at both teams potential lineups with Turiaf or with Rodriguez /Outlaw I’ll definitely take the version of each team that has Turiaf, and its not even close for the Warriors.

Thing A

by sam23 on Jun 11, 2009 3:33 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

You're right

Turiaf is simply an amazing player who can umm… block shots and umm… yeah crap, I’m out of things he is good at.

by Zaig on Jun 12, 2009 2:09 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

How could you not like Turiaf?

The guy had open heart surgery before coming into the league! His career was threatened and he was able to come back and play as a high energy guy.

I like to think they replaced his heart w/ that of a baboon…

He’s still ugly though.

by abobo84 on Jun 10, 2009 3:21 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Turiaf is gorgeous

But that is not relevant. The dude is a serious hustle banger and hard worker. We need him. If he is available then KP should sign him up. And his beard and hair are way cool. All you silly kids who say otherwise should just go back to middle school.

If you think education is expensive, try ignorance.

Even a dog knows the difference between being stumbled over and being kicked.

by Love on Jun 10, 2009 11:41 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Rony Turiaf would be a PERFECT fit...

The guy is blue-collar through and through, a “team” guy, and a relentless worker. He is also very well spoken, humble, and a deep thinker. He was one of the few athletes who spoke out against the Iraq war when it was not fashionable to do so, and stated his case eloquenlty. He can play both PF and C, and can at least make open shots, which I am sure he would see a lot of.

If they can make this deal happen, it will take maybe all of training camp before he becomes a HUGE fan favorite.

"When the power of love overcomes the love of power, the world will know peace." Jimi Hendrix

by philly420pdxhilo on Jun 11, 2009 2:10 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Hated him as a Laker...

but he hasn’t really done anything to sustain that hatred. Good rebounder. Good mid-range jumper.

But is it me, or does he look like Predator? I think I smell a nickname…

by Heizer on Jun 11, 2009 2:32 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

hated him as a laker too...

But after a year in a W’s uni, I really like him. His positive attitude is infectious and the “little things” that he does that don’t show up on the score sheet really impact the game.

Those that are looking at stats to judge Ronny are missing the point.

Only problem for the Blazers is that there is NO WAY he’s not a Warrior next year – in other words….fuggedabowdit

by GeeEssDub on Jun 12, 2009 4:16 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

From a PSD Memphis Fan

Memphis Gets: 24th overall, Travis Outlaw, Martell Webster

Portland Gets: Mike Conley Jr

Offseason:
PG Options: Mike Conley(T)
SG Options: Terrence Williams(D)
Forward Options: Ronnie Turiaf(T) - Damion James(D), Taj Gibson(D), Kevin Seraphin(D)

by TheGreatDane17 on Jun 12, 2009 10:31 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

A site by Blazer fans, for Blazer fans
Start posting about the Trail Blazers »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
Ego, Selfishness, Superstars, and Perspective
Screen_shot_2009-11-03_at_9
Junk Drawer 11/22/09 - Your Greatest Fear
Troll_stone_cropped_small
Who has the best hair in the NBA?
Blazers_small
Mr. McMillan, meet Reality.
Small
From Benefit of the Doubt to Just Plain Doubt.

Recent FanPosts

Trogdor_small
I think it's time to blow this 'Roy' experiment up.
Original
Start Miller and Rudy
Batum_small
Blazers Revert to 2008 Team
Small
Style vs Substance
Small
The Steve Blake Paradox
300px-color_icon_gray_svg_small
Thanksgiving Week Trade Drawer: What To Do With Andre Miller?
Small
I hate the way roy is playing

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

FanShots

Quick hits of video, photos, quotes, chats, links and lists that you find around the web.

Recommended FanShots

A modest proposal: Fire Mike Rice and Antonio Harvey!
For Ann, and Travis.
FREE GREG ODEN
"It's been good for us," Oden said. "We're going to stick with it. We have...

Recent FanShots

Single seat for Bulls - near center court
Koponen!
Tossing Andre Miller Under the Bus
Blazers statistical scouting reports (2008-09 season)
Is this worth linking?
Buzz Cut, Mohawk or Afro? Which one is better?
Did we sign Juwanna man as our 14th guy or for 9M a year?
the key to a portland championship
Pendergraph is running at full speed and could be cleared to play by Christmas.
Bayless describes his situation on the team as "tough".

+ New FanShot All FanShots >


Editors

Kitten_small Dave

Ben_small Ben.

Moderators

Pict1126_small -ken

Polar_bear_small jorga

Terryporter_small prezofdeath

Small usmcr3049

Jesus_icon_i_small T Darkstar

Wallpaper_small geoffm