Blazersedge: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
New Blog: Cottagers Confidential for Fulham FC Fans!

Trade Oden for Love and #6?


Hey Blazer's fans,

 

There's a huge debate going on over at Canis Hoopus (Twolves blog) about whether the Wolves should trade Kevin Love and the #6 pick to y'all for Greg Oden. One of the criticisms on the board has been that we over value our own players and that we probably haven't seen enough of Oden to get a good read on how he's progressing.

 

My question is, as Blazer's fans, how do you feel about this trade? Would you do it, or would you, as one commenter on our board said, laugh the proposal off the table?

 

Please discuss.

Poll
Would you trade Greg Oden for Kevin Love and the #6 pick?
Yes
49 votes
No
702 votes
Doesn't matter, we already screwed the Twolves by keeping Penn!
30 votes

781 votes | Poll has closed

0 recs  |  Comment 365 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

More from Blazersedge

Blazersedge Mailbag: March 18th, 2010

Mar 2010 by Dave - 55 comments

Game 69 Recap: Blazers 109, Raptors 98

Mar 2010 by Dave - 85 comments

Full Court Press

Mar 2010 by Ben. - 16 comments

Blazersedge Mailbag: March 5th, 2010

Mar 2010 by Dave - 165 comments

Around SB Nation

The 12-1 run to nowhere

Mar 2010 from Canis Hoopus - 60 comments

Apastration

Mar 2010 from Canis Hoopus - 161 comments

Franchise altering week

Mar 2010 from Liberty Ballers - 12 comments

Preview: Timberwolves at Kings

Mar 2010 from Sactown Royalty - 17 comments

Comments

Display:

no

who plays center behind Joel? Love?

Best of Senator Clay Davis: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TI4-QyAzY64&feature=related

by cloudydays on Jun 9, 2009 10:07 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

lol

no, just no

pretty funny though

by lurtsman on Jun 10, 2009 10:04 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

this would never happen.

by Ben. on Jun 9, 2009 10:08 AM PDT reply actions   1 recs

True enough, but the poll saved the post... It's a sort of test as to how many people have really given up on him...

"A bizarre and extremely rare hybrid Blazer/Laker fan, Timbo has always struggled to contain the Beast Within, like Dr. Jekyll, Bruce Banner, or Ted Kennedy." — Miled Animal

by timbo on Jun 9, 2009 10:46 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Who is letting Isiah Thomas vote multiple times?

The moderators need to get on this as no one else in their right minds would make this trade. Well, I guess we could excuse Timberwolve fans as how could you be in your right mind after What McHale has done to them over and over again.

by NWfan on Jun 9, 2009 11:45 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Oden > Love

Kevin Love will be a really good player. But I still think that Oden has the potential to be a superstar in this league. He just needs a couple more years of experience. (learning to stay out of foul trouble.)

by tcwoods on Jun 9, 2009 10:12 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Ignoring the inevitable - and correct

arguments of “not enough talent coming back for Oden”, the trade doesn’t make sense from Portland’s perspective. The original poster says that Minny should consider trading Love because they need a player to mesh better with Jefferson. But that’s exactly why trading Oden for Love makes no sense for Portland – because Love wouldn’t mesh in the starting lineup with Aldridge.

by Storyteller on Jun 9, 2009 10:12 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Heh

The Wolves should worry about finding a Center to mesh with Love, he’s going to be a far more efficient player than Jefferson.

Wolves should see if Memphis/OKC wants Jefferson and trade him straight up for the 2-3 pick to get Thabeet. (Although if they got the 2 pick Rubio would also be tough to pass up.)

by Zaig on Jun 9, 2009 10:16 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

For the Wolves

That dream center would Pryzbilla. (Just my opinion)

"Come on Eddie, let's get serious."

by biggity2bit on Jun 9, 2009 10:18 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

We don't want AJ, or anything they can offer really.

Przybilla/Love would be such an insane defensive rebounding duo. A bit lacking on the offensive side of the ball though.

by Zaig on Jun 9, 2009 10:22 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I think Love will become a good offensive player

Not great, but good… he would need a Joel to cover his back though.

I remember from discussions last off-season, when I went over there to ask how they envisioned Jefferson and Love fitting together, that some of them had their hopes on this big defensive center guy from Euro-land who was gonna come over and be that Przybilla type. I’m not sure if they still feel that way (or if it was wise to begin with), but that was a commonly held belief.

And then Love would be the 6th man type guy.

Love can shoot, he’s got moves, nice touch inside, he’s just too small and slow and unathletic to be more than a good star role player. The star PFs, the ones with length, athleticism, and similar skill to Love, will eat him up.

Tyson Chandler? Joel? Dalembert? I dunno… they need a defensive presence inside or they will always suffer. And that is part of the problem— I think the Z-Bo era taught us that no matter how good someone is on offense, if they simply can’t or won’t tbe good on defense, then it will never be enough. You need your inside guys to be able to challenge shots and play strong defense.

Mortimer

by Mortimer on Jun 9, 2009 10:31 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Laughed off the table

not a jab at you …..just agreeing with the person who said that

"You're welcome friend
I love you."
- Tom "Dragline" inHawaii

by 92wastheyear on Jun 9, 2009 10:16 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Check out Canus Hoopus...

They have one guy over there that honestly thinks Love is a better player than LMA.

"And once again we can say, it's a GREAT day to be a Blazer."- Brian Wheeler

by lrh86 on Jun 9, 2009 10:19 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

just fyi, that's not all that crazy

I disagree with that guy, but there are several statistical measures that like Love better.

by jksnake99 on Jun 9, 2009 10:39 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

There are also several statistical measures that say Oden is better than Howard.

You can’t just look at a couple of isolated stats to come up with a conclusion on a players worth.

"And once again we can say, it's a GREAT day to be a Blazer."- Brian Wheeler

by lrh86 on Jun 9, 2009 10:42 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

show me one that says Oden is better than Howard

I agree that you can’t just look at a couple isolated stats, and I think looking at the whole picture gives Aldridge the edge over Love, but I have seen much more ridiculous things posted here on BlazersEdge regarding opposing players.

Love is a vastly, vastly better rebounder than Aldridge. For those who think rebounding is paramount from your PF, Love might be the better option. He’s not a pretty decent #2 scoring option the way Aldridge is, of course, and Love is probably even more suspect on D than LMA, but the rebounding and outlet passing that Love brings are not to be ignored.

by jksnake99 on Jun 9, 2009 10:54 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Greg Oden has a higher offensive rebound rate than Howard...

And as far as Love being a better rebounder. He is slightly better but I wonder how many rebounds he would pull down if he was playing with a good seven foot rebounding center.

"And once again we can say, it's a GREAT day to be a Blazer."- Brian Wheeler

by lrh86 on Jun 9, 2009 11:03 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

You and I are more or less on the same page

I was just trying to play a little devils advocate to (hopefully) show that a Wolves fan saying Love>Aldridge isn’t as nuts as some of the homer posts on Blazers Edge.

by jksnake99 on Jun 9, 2009 11:06 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Um, Kevin Love is a role playing undersized no defense PF

Yeah, I think we’ll keep Oden, who was just as good raw-stats-wise in less minutes and out of shape and coming off a bad injury and on a really good team.

Yeah… Kevin Love is alright, but he’s no Greg Oden and he will always be a 6’8"-on-a-good-day slow but skilled PF. The kind that does nothing but abuse the dummies of the league and in turn gets abused by every star PF because of how physically overmatched he is, and they are just as skilled.

Yeah… no, this is a really incorrect idea. I apologize for it on behalf of whoever thought it up.

Mortimer

by Mortimer on Jun 9, 2009 10:21 AM PDT reply actions   3 recs

I like Kevin Love

but come on. Trade Oden for an undersized post and a #6 pick in a weak draft? This proposal would be laughed out of the room.

by morg on Jun 9, 2009 10:24 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

I like Love and think he was a good pick for the Wolves, but for the reason Storyteller has outlined above he would be a horrible fit next to LaMarcus

And I take a Greg Oden posting a PER of 18 while coming back from injury over a healthy Love posting a PER of 18 any day.

by Norsktroll on Jun 9, 2009 10:24 AM PDT reply actions   1 recs

This is just silly...

I’d like to point out that even though “undersized PF’s” have become chic in the NBA right now, look at who’s playing for the championship…

Andrew Bynum
Pau Gasol
Dwight Howard

Legit 7-footers are like supermodel girlfriends, you have one or you’re trying to get one…

"Now, you take a bobcat or a Jayhawk. You know they'll run if you give 'em the chance. But when one don't run, why, you shoot him and shoot him quick. Raef's my dog, Pa. I've gotta do what's right..." Old Yeller (1957)

by RoyGoesTheDynamite on Jun 9, 2009 10:28 AM PDT up reply actions   1 recs

Right

With the sort of exception of Howard, 7 footers who couldn’t carry their teams to the playoffs (or at least very far) without a superstar wing players.

"Come on Eddie, let's get serious."

by biggity2bit on Jun 9, 2009 10:30 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

like roy?

bayless leaves over my dead body
sign mike bibby

by thomasikehara on Jun 9, 2009 11:10 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

And how many teams won a championships in the last 10 years without one?

Let’s see depending on how you class Kevin Garnett, it’s either 1 or two.

The Spurs have always had Tim Duncan, and two of them with David Robinson as well.
The Lakers had Shaq. Miami Heat had Shaq.

The exceptions belong to Detroit, and possibly Boston.

If you go even further back to, let’s say from 1978 – 1979 to the present, you’ll see having a big man is essential. ( I put Moses Malone down as a big man because he was just as dominant as Dwight Howard at about the same size.)

2007-08 Boston – Kevin Garnett
2006-07 San Antonio – Tim Duncan
2005-06 Miami – Shaquille O’Neal
2004-05 San Antonio – Tim Duncan
2003-04 Detroit
2002-03 San Antonio – Tim Duncan & David Robinson
2001-02 Lakers – Shaquille O’Neal
2000-01 Lakers – Shaquille O’Neal
1999-00 Lakers – Shaquille O’Neal
1998-99 San Antonio – David Robinson & Tim Duncan
1997-98 Chicago (Michael Jordan)
1996-97 Chicago (Michael Jordan)
1995-96 Chicago (Michael Jordan)
1994-95 Houston – Hakeem Olajuwon
1993-94 Houston – Hakeem Olajuwon
1992-93 Chicago (Michael Jordan)
1991-92 Chicago (Michael Jordan)
1990-91 Chicago (Michael Jordan)
1989-90 Detroit – Bill Laimbeer
1988-89 Detroit – Bill Laimbeer
1987-88 Lakers – Kareem Abdul-Jabar
1986-87 Lakers – Kareem Abdul-Jabar
1985-86 Boston – Robert Parish
1984-84 Lakers – Kareem Abdul-Jabar
1983-84 Boston – Robert Parish
1982-83 Philadelphia – Moses Malone
1981-82 Lakers – Kareem Abdul-Jabar
1980-81 Boston – Robert Parish
1979-80 Lakers – Kareem Abdul-Jabar
1978-79 Seattle Supersonics

Get the picture. So while guard play looks nice and all. The only one to win Championships without a skilled big man is the legend Michael Jordan. Big men like Greg Oden, Dwight Howard, Bynum and Gasol are what teams need to bring home the Larry O’brien trophy.

by ECFIVESTER on Jun 11, 2009 9:16 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

78/79 Sonics had Sikma

who was no slouch

"You're welcome friend
I love you."
- Tom "Dragline" inHawaii

by 92wastheyear on Jun 11, 2009 9:18 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

But ...

not what you consider a hall of fame big man. None the less your arguement only further shows how if you’re going to win a championship in the NBA you’ve got to have a big man.

by ECFIVESTER on Jun 11, 2009 1:25 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

The 04 Pistons squad had Sheed

While he is not a prototypical big man, his post defence was invaluable.

"And once again we can say, it's a GREAT day to be a Blazer."- Brian Wheeler

by lrh86 on Jun 11, 2009 11:50 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

True

They also had Ben Wallace, who was the denfensive Player of the Year. No slouch neither. However the point I referencing was that of a dominant center/ 7 footer.

by ECFIVESTER on Jun 11, 2009 1:27 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

In all fairness...

Rasheed is just as much 7 feet as Garnett. They are both 6’11" and they also both play the same type of game(jump shooters with good defence)

Not that it matters as far as your argument goes. I just felt like being a little snarky;-)

"And once again we can say, it's a GREAT day to be a Blazer."- Brian Wheeler

by lrh86 on Jun 11, 2009 3:01 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

so true

Oden has shown flashes of being awsome… and really if he only impoved one part of his game for the rest of his career ( NOT FOULING ALL THE TIME) he would be immensly better then Kevin Love. Its not like we need oden to score 30 we have roy and LMA for that we just need him to dunk in some offensive boards, block shots, rebound … he dose all of that already he just can’t stay on the court because of the fouls so thats the only are he needs to impove on to beexactly what this team needs.

by kwestfan on Jun 9, 2009 8:05 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Honest question here

Are any of you concerned at all about Oden’s injury history? Or perhaps more specifically, concerned whether or not Oden’s ceiling is dictated by his superior athleticism, and that said ceiling will/may lower if he loses some of his athleticism?

I think most Hoopus readers agree that Oden clearly has the superior potential of the two, but we’re trying to a grasp on how good will he be if he only comes back at 85% of what he was before microfracture surgery.

"Come on Eddie, let's get serious."

by biggity2bit on Jun 9, 2009 10:29 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Of course we're concerned...

but I don’t think we’ve seen Oden’s ceiling after just one year. Kevin Love is a good player
and might be very successfull in the leage. Ask again in a couple of years :)

by hellsfrozenover on Jun 9, 2009 10:32 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

had to delete your last comment… watch your language please

by Ben. on Jun 9, 2009 10:36 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

His biggest problem was being in shape

Which caused him to get into foul trouble.

When he played 30+ minutes, he averaged something around 15/11 with some blocks. And that as a dumb, raw as cookie dough, uncoordinated out of shape rookie who had no post moves. He was never taken off the court for how he was playing, because when he played he did pretty good— just because of foul trouble.

I don’t think he even needs to re-gain any old athleticism, he just needs to be in shape, which being forced to keep off his feet for a whole year caused him to not be. He couldn’t even do squats for two years. I do think, per what recent history has foretold in the ancient microfracture scriptures of yesteryear, that he will regain some of the athleticism he showed pre-injury, but I ain’t worried about that… just him being in shape, which will make his still-formidable-and-elite athleticism be accessible consistently.

Right now, his knee is good. No pain, which is rare. He had some great moments of athleticism, but overall he was just out of shape. Once he is in shape (which is inevitable), he’ll be purty good.

There are plenty of fans who worry, but that’s fine. No injury has been the lingering sort, and he just needs the time to get back in shape before we can REALLY see what he is like.

Mortimer

by Mortimer on Jun 9, 2009 10:39 AM PDT up reply actions   1 recs

Amare

Year prior 26ppg
Microfracture
Year after 20ppg
2nd year after 26ppg

The team didn’t change all that much either. Those extra 6ppg basically came from him finally being 100% again.

by Zaig on Jun 9, 2009 1:05 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I think we'll see the big jump too

But, worst case scenario, his athleticism level is what it is, but being in good shape will make him APPEAR really athletic.

Because, he still had it plenty of moments, but they were just moments. When he’s in shape, he’ll be able to do it ALL dee time.

The first year of recovery shouldn’t be judged so harshly.

Morty

by Mortimer on Jun 9, 2009 1:15 PM PDT up reply actions   1 recs

I am agreeing

Amare went from one of the top scorers in the NBA to another standard 20ppg guy because of Micro. The next year, he was back to being one of the top scorers in the NBA.

by Zaig on Jun 9, 2009 4:12 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

STOP ARGUING WITH ME

I was agreeing as well!

We are becoming fast friends for a lifetime now.

Mortimer

by Mortimer on Jun 9, 2009 4:16 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

most definetely concerned

I would be quicker to trade Oden than a lot of posters on here, but I’d only do so for a player significantly more elite than Love— like (at minimum) a Tony Parker for instance. Oden’s potential is still too great.

by jksnake99 on Jun 9, 2009 10:41 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Repost Canis Hoopus

After watching Bynum in the playoffs struggle massively coming back from injury and Howard dominating on raw athleticism alone (he is still not a very skilled player, which is frightening considering he is only 23 and could still add better post moves and a mid-range jumper) people are a lot more optimistic about Oden again. First reports from summer training are very encouraging that he is regaining speed an vert, he e.g. had not started doing squats again before this month so you can expect him to build a lot of strength back in his lower body. He was playing last season at about 60-70 percent of his athletic ability and still trying to adapt to the increased speed of the game. And they are teaming him up with Jerryd Bayless, who while not having a great rookie season with little playing time is the hardest worker on the team.

The sky is the limit for Oden, and even if he wasn’t that impressive himself (though about the same PER as Love and a fantastic rebounding percentage isn’t shabby) he instantly made everyone around him better. Once he gets his quickness back (look up his predraft camp times) and his teammates learn to find him when he is open he can be very very helpful to the team, since he has better hands and is a better passer than say Bynum or Howard. I doubt the Blazers would trade him for anyone outside of an established star in or before his prime.

by Norsktroll on Jun 9, 2009 10:48 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Who blinks first in a deal surrounding Oden for Bosh

Or Oden for Amare? Pritchard or Kerr/Colangelo? Assume both guys would agree to sign an extension in Portland.

That Steve Nash is exactly the same as Kirk Hinrich, but worse.
by NBA Observer on Apr 8, 2009 12:23 PM CDT

by Ozzie Montana on Jun 9, 2009 10:55 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

good question

I probably do the Bosh trade but not the Amare trade.

by jksnake99 on Jun 9, 2009 10:59 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

bosh is a deadbeat

That's right, that's a picture of me with my new bff Joel Przybilla. He said my Billy Idol Karaoke was spot on.

by svlittle on Jun 9, 2009 11:18 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Oden for Bosh, no way

LMA for Bosh, sure. What Oden can offer is far more than what Bosh has over LMA

I'm a really really ridiculously good looking orange mocha frappaccino drinking manhammer sandwich

by hobobob on Jun 9, 2009 2:05 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

under that scenario, I'd look to move LMA as discussed below.

Its all a matter of how confident you are that Oden will stay healthy and become a star.

by jksnake99 on Jun 9, 2009 2:42 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I saw that. Usually read all the comments before commenting

but, there’s something to be said for that. It would come down to who you could get for LMA in that case. I have high hopes for Oden. If we’re a championship team, it will be because of him. Otherwise, we’ll need to do something drastic like this.

I'm a really really ridiculously good looking orange mocha frappaccino drinking manhammer sandwich

by hobobob on Jun 10, 2009 10:40 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Anybody see the post on the Knicks site about Bosh

I can’t even post the title for fear of being banned!

by We-B-Dunkin on Jun 9, 2009 5:20 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Wouldn't happen as long as LMA is in the picture

"You're welcome friend
I love you."
- Tom "Dragline" inHawaii

by 92wastheyear on Jun 9, 2009 11:20 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yah but NBA doctrine says never ever trade a big for a small

"You're welcome friend
I love you."
- Tom "Dragline" inHawaii

by 92wastheyear on Jun 9, 2009 11:23 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

that doctrine is moronic

I would trade Aldridge (and more) for a Tony Parker, Derrick Rose, Rajon Rondo in a nanosecond.

by jksnake99 on Jun 9, 2009 11:24 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Maybe

You named three off the top of your head and if you add CP3 and D-will that makes 5. Now how many LMAs are out there ….right now? 25 or younger

"You're welcome friend
I love you."
- Tom "Dragline" inHawaii

by 92wastheyear on Jun 9, 2009 12:08 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I think Jake objects to it being an iron clad rule

There are certainly PGs we’d trade LMA for, but their teams wouldn’t trade us that PG for LMA, so it is moot (moot is my word of the day).

We got Magloire for Steve Blake, and obviously that was a bad deal for us even though we were on the ‘right’ side of big for small.

I wouldn’t trade LMA for anyone below an absolute perfect fit at PG, since with Roy as the primary playmaker we can do well with a role playing PG as long as they can play defense and hit a 3 sometimes.

Mortimer

by Mortimer on Jun 9, 2009 12:12 PM PDT up reply actions   1 recs

I know .....but there are reasons a cliche is a cliche

but it is the truth ….by and large

"You're welcome friend
I love you."
- Tom "Dragline" inHawaii

by 92wastheyear on Jun 9, 2009 12:18 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

why would they need LMA

they have West

"You're welcome friend
I love you."
- Tom "Dragline" inHawaii

by 92wastheyear on Jun 9, 2009 12:20 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

West is a moot point

As is Jaynes floating a trade idea.

MOOTINESS.

Mootimer

by Mortimer on Jun 9, 2009 12:21 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

He tried to make up a scenario in which it would make sense to acquire Lee

Not that he heard any rumors. I would say if they would be willing to trade Joel that could also qualify. But neither thing is likely to happen. Not KP trading LMA or even Joel. And especially not the Hornets trading CP3.

by Norsktroll on Jun 9, 2009 12:22 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Hey!

I’m Dwight Jaynes and you just committed an ad hominem attack against me.

I am so going to flag you.

Roy is the best player in the world with the exception of Incarcerated Mike from Queensbridge .

by Nick Van Excellent on Jun 9, 2009 9:29 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Hmm

Can you get banned for insulting yourself? Because I’m pretty sure you just did.

by Zaig on Jun 10, 2009 9:25 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

If we're just talking PFs:

Jefferson, Millsap, Bosh, Smith, Lee, and Love. If we want to add all young bigs into the equation, add Dwight, Oden, and Horford to the mix.

If you go from 26 and below, you also add Nene, Amare, and Kaman to the convo. Also, in the next couple years you should be able to add Beasley and Griffin to the list.

by Royster on Jun 9, 2009 12:23 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I would consider Brook Lopez. Lee is older than he seems, Millsap is very good but not nearly on the level of LMA as an offensive player. LMA is a lot better than Kaman, Beasley and Griffin.

by Norsktroll on Jun 9, 2009 12:25 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Just like I'd consider

CP to be better than DWill, who’s better than Tony Parker, I’d still put them all in the same general ball park of PGs. I’m not saying all these guys are better than LaMarcus, but I think they’re all (with the possible exception of Kaman) in the same ball park of PGs.

Also, I didn’t mean to imply Griffin or Beasley are there yet, but that if we ask again in two years, they should replace some of the older guys.

by Royster on Jun 9, 2009 12:32 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I'm not sure why everyone thinks so highly of Lee

I watched him as much as I could this year, and saw hustle and grit, but not that much more. Same with Millsap. I can’t put them in the same group with LMA.

I'm a really really ridiculously good looking orange mocha frappaccino drinking manhammer sandwich

by hobobob on Jun 9, 2009 2:12 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Not to say people don't watch some guys play reguarly

But people like Lee often get overrated because we haven’t been able to develop a healthy level of contempt for what they don’t do because we aren’t familiar enough with them.

Lee as a starter would make a team worse because he can’t play defense and will never be able to. And you can’t have that in a starting big man playing 30+ minutes a night, and be a good team. Almost never (I can’t think of one example, really).

Millsap came out of “nowhere” to become maybe an even better option at starting PF for the Jazz, so when a guy is fresh and new like that he gets overrated as well. Just like when Calderon took over for TJ Ford and everyone loved him so much, and then this recent season he was average.

I’d rather have Millsap over Lee any day, but people love Lee a lot more than he is worth.

Morty

by Mortimer on Jun 9, 2009 2:25 PM PDT up reply actions   1 recs

Right, I'm with you and think they're great players

But LMA’s a solid, solid player that gives you much more skill than those guys. Yes, they’ll out-hustle and be annoying and do some things that LMA won’t, but from a skill standpoint, you don’t build a team around them. We are building a team around LMA (Roy and Oden too). That’s a pretty big difference.

I’m not saying I dislike Lee or Millsap at all. I just don’t think they’re nearly as skilled or as valuable as we’ve seen the billed recently. Putting Millsap and Lee in the same group as LMA is bad, but it’s worse to put them in the same group as Bosh.

Naw wha I’m sayin’?

BTW, I’m still reccing everyone one of your posts. It gets tough because you comment so much. I think I’ll just pay someone to write a program that does it for me.

I'm a really really ridiculously good looking orange mocha frappaccino drinking manhammer sandwich

by hobobob on Jun 9, 2009 2:31 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I don't think you build around Lee or Millsap

but I also don’t think you we’re built around LaMarcus, at all. Our team simply doesn’t work without Roy. In the last two years, we’ve been 3-9 without Roy (1-7 the year before this), and 6-1 without LaMarcus. Small sample sizes notwithstanding, that doesn’t inspire confidence in LaMarcus’s ability to carry a team, so I don’t think “can you build around this player?” factor into it that much.

The thing is, only factoring skill is one thing. Sure, there’s nothing stopping most guys in the league from doing what Millsap and Lee do, and yet, almost no guys in the league do what they do. I don’t believe that a guy’s motor should be discounted so heavily compared to skill. If you put Millsap’s heart in Tim Thomas’s chest, you could have had one of the most dominant PFs in the league (as seen in the 06 playoffs), but does that mean Millsap and Lee shouldn’t get credit for putting that kind of effort and dedication in?

And for the record, I wouldn’t put Lee and Millsap near Bosh, but the comparison was for LaMarcus, which I absolutely believe should be considered in the same ballpark, they’re just at opposite ends of the ball park. LaMarcus has a nearly identical efficiency to those two, but his higher usage gives him the edge. Bosh had a significantly higher usage AND efficiency, which is much more impressive.

comparison

by Royster on Jun 9, 2009 2:58 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

What worries me about those guys is that they're "motor" players

I love heart, but what happens to those guys in a few years. These guys tend to go at it hard, then fall apart. Those who base their game on skill have longevity. That’s why you can build a team around LMA and not Lee. Lee won’t be playing at such a high rate when he’s 32. That’s just a guess of course, but I’m a little weary of players such as this. They tend to burn bright like starts, then just fade fast.

Also, hustle tends to depend on opportunity. It’s much easier to game plan and take Lee and Millsap out of their games than it is to take a skilled player of similar efficiency out of theirs. To beat a hustle player, all you have to do is hustle. To be a skill player intent on hustling against you, you have to be skilled.

Totally agree that skill without heart’s a waste. Marbury, Francis, and a grip load of stars proved that. Heart in a skilled player is what makes them the superstar. I swear there are guys in the NBA every bit as athletic as Jordan, they just don’t have his heart and determination.

We’re not building specifically around LMA, but he’s part of a core of player the Blazers claim to be building around. Whether or not that’s true is up for speculation, I guess. But, until someone proves the plethora of statements by KP, Nate and others that we’re building around this core are wrong, I’m going trust those lines. I get what you’re saying and see why you’re saying it, but it flies in the face of what the Blazers have been saying for two years.

I'm a really really ridiculously good looking orange mocha frappaccino drinking manhammer sandwich

by hobobob on Jun 10, 2009 10:49 AM PDT up reply actions   1 recs

My issue with saying

we’re building around LaMarcus but you can’t build around Lee/Millsap, is if you replaced LA with one of those guys, we still probably make the playoffs this year, but could you really say we make the playoffs if you kept LaMarcus and replaced Roy with, say, Jason Richardson?

LA is potentially a great player, and he can do things those guys can’t, but those guys do things he doesn’t. I think he’s definitely more valuable, but I don’t think there’s as tremendous a value gap between them as you’re saying.

by Royster on Jun 10, 2009 10:57 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Fair enough

It’s just an assessment. I’m not that great at them either, so there’s that. But, in a few years, let’s look in on this and see where we are. I’m not saying I’m confident that I’ll be right, but I will be right;)

I'm a really really ridiculously good looking orange mocha frappaccino drinking manhammer sandwich

by hobobob on Jun 10, 2009 1:35 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I agree with ya

I love what LMA does, think he wants to not do what I don’t love, and as he keeps adding strength and confidence he’ll continue to improve.

Out of Lee and Millsap, I like Millsap. I think Lee is extremely overrated, as a starting PF.

I think Millsap could be as good or better than LMA, if LMA doesn’t improve. I think LMA has more potential to be even better left to mine, and I’m too invested in seeing where he ends up to wanna change it.

I thought you were still reccin’ my posts, and I try to return the favor, but I didn’t wanna mention it because it’s like looking a gift horse in the mouth. It brightens up my day every time.

Ya don’t need to rec the junk drawer posts though… that’ll keep the super computer you build to rec my posts from overloading and starting to spark and smoke.

Mortimer

by Mortimer on Jun 10, 2009 2:46 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Lol at Love

"You're welcome friend
I love you."
- Tom "Dragline" inHawaii

by 92wastheyear on Jun 9, 2009 12:26 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

The guys who are versatile talents and able to be effective on both ends of the court are

To me, are Millsap, Bosh, Dwight, and Horford.

Plus Nene.

LMA is part of a small group that has an all-round game that you don’t need to compensate heavily for. LMA needs a stronger rebounder next to him and probably always will, but we got Oden so that is a moot point.

LMA is not alone in his skillset or value, but he is certainly valuable and unique.

My problems with the others listed:
Jefferson: No defense.
Josh Smith: BBIQ, shot selection, attitude.
Lee: Defense, wants to be more than he is (a role player)
Love: Role player, defense.
Amare: Ego, defense.
Kaman: He is good when healthy, though his injuries do worry me because of how all-over-his-body they are and how he only has put together 2 actually good seasons.

Mortimer

by Mortimer on Jun 9, 2009 12:30 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

My point wasn't to say

that all these guys are better than LaMarcus, but to counter 92wastheyear’s implication that because Jake could name 5 PGs he’d trade for LA, they were somehow more of a commodity than LaMarcus. It’s just as easy to put together a list of young talented bigs in the league. Obviously I don’t think all of these guys are better than LA, but I think you’d have to put each of them in the same ball park, talent-wise.

by Royster on Jun 9, 2009 12:41 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Oh, I agree with ya

I was just narrowing it down a lil’ further, but adding it was only my opinion.

I think LMA can be a really good two-way player, and with big men that is pretty rare. We don’t exactly have a big list we all agree on with that sort of player, after all.

There are very few PGs we would be happy to trade LMA for (or at least begrudgingly agree that the PG would be better than LMA would be), and there are also very few young bigs with LMA’s skillset and potential. So, because of his rare abilities and size, we’d only move him for a really really really good PG.

Mortimer

by Mortimer on Jun 9, 2009 12:46 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I guess that is what I was trying to say

in my ham-handed way. Thanks for stating my point better than I could

"You're welcome friend
I love you."
- Tom "Dragline" inHawaii

by 92wastheyear on Jun 9, 2009 12:51 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Of course

I wouldn’t just trade him for a Devin Harris or Jose Calderon just because they’re PGs, but if it’s any of the top four or five guys, screw the “doctrine”, give me the PG.

by Royster on Jun 9, 2009 12:55 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Bigs for Smalls

I think GREAT PG’s are in a similar class as GREAT BIG MEN.

There are lots of Calderon’s, TJ Fords, Etc who are good pg’s, but not elite. There are very few Elite pg’s in the league, just like big men.

I’ve always interpreted the mantra to be Never Trade a Big for a Wing (2 or 3). Those are the players who are a dime a dozen (typically, MJ not withstanding).

Witty Unpredictable Talent and Natural Game

by iDea on Jun 9, 2009 3:33 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Random posting error with a couple double posts before

but if we’re just talking PFs: Lee, Jefferson, Smith, Bosh, Millsap, and Love. If you want to add all young bigs, throw Howard, Oden, Lopez and Horford in there, too.

If we want to go 26 and under, you also throw in Amare, Kaman and Nene.

And this is all without mentioning a certain center on a team that shall not be named

by Royster on Jun 9, 2009 12:27 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Purple and Gold

I hate the guy, but he’s scored 40 exactly one more time than LaMarcus and is 2 years younger than him.

by Royster on Jun 9, 2009 12:39 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

The Thunder wear Blue and Orange

You need to get your eyes checked, Kristic is on the Thunder.

by Mortimer on Jun 9, 2009 12:46 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Then we would have to trade Oden too, or we would have two amazing centers and Travis/Shav :)

Comparing him to Oden I would still prefer Oden. So I guess my point is KP will just stick with what he has.

by Norsktroll on Jun 9, 2009 12:48 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Clearly I'd never want to trade for him

not only because of the Oden factor, but also because of the uncanny resemblance to Tracy Morgan. Just including him on the lists of young bigs with talent comparable to LA’s.

by Royster on Jun 9, 2009 12:50 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Doesn't that need to be a 4 team deal then?

I don’t think it is wise to make a trade counting on another trade to happen later.

by tominhawaii on Jun 9, 2009 1:04 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

No way i'd trade oden

his porential is too great. His affect on the game too large, and to receive bosh would make aldridge redundant or even stunt his continued growth. The player I’d look at would be howard or even lebron (I hate him though). There really isn’t another player in the league I’m interested in. Yes, it could be a gamble, but I’ve seen too much potential with Oden.

"Fernandez, to my eyes, is the Blazer who walks that walk most comfortably. A lot of Portland's fans (egged on, dare I say, by their local broadcasters) lament things like how Ron Artest or Yao Ming get to hit Brandon Roy's arms.

But I suspect Fernandez sees all that and thinks: We get to hit arms! Cool!"

http://myespn.go.com/blogs/truehoop/0-39-135/On-Playoff-Experience.html

by ratbastird on Jun 9, 2009 12:07 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Not Pritchard.

Neither one is value for Oden and both play a position we already have a young stud at.

hakkaa päälle !

by timg56 on Jun 9, 2009 12:15 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

We supposedly turned down a deal for Amare during the season

Amare and Bosh are better than LMA, but I doubt Amare is a good fit and if we could get Bosh and he’d be happy here I’m sure we’d try to get him.

But not for Oden. Bosh or Amare without an Oden next to them doesn’t help that much.

KP and Friends love Oden, and think he’ll be great. As do I.

Mortimer

by Mortimer on Jun 9, 2009 12:19 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

See, ultimately, I think this is where the disagreement lies

It seems to me that the limit for Oden is well beneath the sky. Your point seems to be that he’s been set back by injury and that will be behind him soon enough. It’s not clear to me that this is true: would his prospects be less bright if he had been healthy but played poorly for 2 years? As opposed to his actual problems? I’m not sure they would be, mostly because I’m convinced that staying healthy enough to play in the NBA is a skill, one that Oden has not shown that he has, never mind the possible long term effects from microfracture.

You note below that many 7-footers have these kinds of injuries…well, exactly. It reduces their value. Several people have suggested that Oden has “superstar potential.” Frankly, I don’t know that I know what either of those words mean, but I think his likelihood of becoming a superstar is significantly lower than many here seem to.

by Eric in Madison on Jun 9, 2009 11:01 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Oden is enough to anchor the defense of a championship team right now

If he can stay on the floor an additional 10 minutes a game, it will mean an additional 5-7 wins next year for the Blazers (all other things being equal) and an advance to the conference finals. So the number one thing he needs to do this off-season is address his defensive footwork, get to the correct playing weight, and learn to maintain space between himself and smaller guards while keeping his arms up. He’s healthy now, we’ll see what the future holds.

The expectation is his offensive game will develop, but he doesn’t need to be a great offensive player for the Blazers to win it all. See also: Bill Russell.

by baduk on Jun 9, 2009 11:14 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I see your point but Amare had microfracture and his knee looks

pretty good. Not to mention that Oden’s microfracture was deemed not as serious as Amare’s or Zach Randolph’s.

It has mainly been sitting around for a year that has set him back. This next season will tell us a lot about what he can or can’t do.

Koponen - PG of the future. For Italy, that is. Book it.

by Blazerholic on Jun 9, 2009 11:21 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

See, this is only a part of my point

The possible lingering effects of the mircrofracture exist, but even without that…look, when was the last time Greg Oden was really healthy for a basketball season? High School? As I note elsewhere, not all ligaments, bones, etc. are the same. Guys who get hurt tend to…get hurt. That’s what worries me about Oden. I keep harping on it, but staying healthy is an ability.

by Eric in Madison on Jun 9, 2009 11:28 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I expect Greg will deal with injuries his whole career

But, not all injuries are created equal. If he suffers injuries throughout his career like the ones he suffered this year, I think most Blazer fans would be happy and live with that level. If he suffers the types of injuries that Bynum has dealt with the last two years, then that is another story entirely. In the first case, I think he continues to progress and becomes the player we hope he will become. If it is the latter, then the curse lives on…

by Cyclops@Centercourt on Jun 9, 2009 11:38 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

The thing about it is

if his injuries were all connected then we would have a problem, but they are not.

Wrist-healed up fine and still played with it

MF Knee-yeah this one was bad but the Blazers medical staff took MRIs before the draft and they were said to be pristine. Nonetheless, this was a major thing that sucked royally, but as has been stated before, the procedure was very mild on the scale.

Foot/ankle-in the beginning of the season, Bynum hung on his neck and he came down awkward rolling his ankle. Now I do not how you can say that rolling your ankle makes you more of an injury threat as if you have NOT rolled your ankle playing basketball, you are not playing real basketball.

Knee 2-Corey Maggette crashed into his kneecap. I do not see how that could be considered chronic.

True Oden has been injured more than we here would of liked, but there is no pattern of chronic degenerative injury. His foot is fine unlike Walton, Zydrudis, or Yao, and besides the cartilage he has never had any structural problems in the knee.

many 7-footers have these kinds of injuries

Well not really the case here as wrist injuries can happen to anyone, same with rolled ankles and having someone crash into your knee is a freak occurrence. Lastly her eis a list of MF surgery patients: Jason Kidd, Steve Yzerman, John Stockton,Kenyon Martin, Antonio McDyess, Zach Randolph, Brian Grant, Chris Webber, Allan Houston, Penny Hardaway, Jamal Mashburn,Terrell Brandon and Amare. Of those not even 1 is a legit 7 footer so your argument does not hold water that 7 footers will be prone to the types of injuries that Greg has had.

When people mention that “Greg Oden is injury prone!!” they are not investigating the situation at all. There is no pattern of chronic longterm injury and even with the MF surgery, it was a preventative and minor in scale.

"Damn the Blazers. Damn them to hell. They are working the rest of the league like a speed bag." - Bill Simmons 6/26/08

by SpyderRyder on Jun 9, 2009 11:44 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

See, I think it's a problem even if the injuries aren't connected

which is the point I tried to make just above, but I’ve made that point enough and will stop now.

by Eric in Madison on Jun 9, 2009 11:47 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Weird

double post and it left something out. Sorry

by Eric in Madison on Jun 9, 2009 11:54 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

the double post has been going on all morning

but it doesn’t show as a two posts to others, I think

That's right, that's a picture of me with my new bff Joel Przybilla. He said my Billy Idol Karaoke was spot on.

by svlittle on Jun 9, 2009 11:55 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

If you look at the footage of both the Maggette and Bynum incidents, when Oden was injuried, I’m not sure you can blame Oden. Bynum pulled him down from behind awkwardly and Maggette killed his kneecap. Even Simmons, Oden-hater, admits this.

proud hinrichsheeple

by Cablinasian on Jun 9, 2009 11:55 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

no

the main problem is the MF knee. Every nba player rolls their ankles, and getting hit square on the kneecap is a once in a decade thing for a player, leaving only the wrist and the MF knee.

How many nba players have injured wrists? Not too many, especially big men., leaving on the the MF knee as something to worry about, but as slow as the Blazers have played it and the minor scale of the MF compared to others it is a non issue.

"Damn the Blazers. Damn them to hell. They are working the rest of the league like a speed bag." - Bill Simmons 6/26/08

by SpyderRyder on Jun 9, 2009 11:58 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

When I see the acronym "MF"

in front of Oden’s knee, microfracture is not the first thing that comes to mind…

by Cyclops@Centercourt on Jun 9, 2009 12:13 PM PDT up reply actions   1 recs

When I read MF

I think of Daniel Dumile.

Witty Unpredictable Talent and Natural Game

by iDea on Jun 9, 2009 3:41 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I get what you are saying

But I think you’re overstating the sort of injuries he has had and how it is somehow evidence of such type of injuries occuring again in the future.

I’d be more likely to believe a tiny dude like Love getting beaten and battered by everyone being so much bigger, longer, and stronger than him and that shortening his career of usefulness than a guy with huge size and strength.

BUT, both predictions are impossible to prove and thus silly to argue for. I think a body like Love is much more likely to break down, but I can’t prove it. Nor can someone prove a prediction for future unlucky injuries for Oden.

Camby, Kenyon, Nene, Big Z, lotsa big men had lotsa early injuries and then overcame then. They had worse and more consistent injuries than Oden has had as well. Early injuries, when properly healed like Oden’s have, don’t tend to return, the luck tends to level out.

If you got problems with your body that make you get hurt, like Yao or McGrady, that is different. Despite the OMG ONE LEG IS LONGER nonsense, Oden has no such natural defects in his body. That we know of, of course, but no one in recent NBA history has had their body poured over more by medical experts.

Mortimer

by Mortimer on Jun 9, 2009 12:18 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Oden's hands

are “okay”. He has a much softer touch than Howard, for example, but one of my frustrations is watching him get stripped.

by T$ 225 on Jun 9, 2009 12:20 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

That happened during the first few weeks

He made the adjustment and then it hardly happened.

His one handed rebounds, ability to get his big ol’ mitts on every board on both ends of the court, and ability to catch passes is really good for a big of his age and lack of coordination.

M.

by Mortimer on Jun 9, 2009 12:22 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

The offseason sucks

Its been, what, 4 weeks? And I haven’t seen a single one handed rebound… I love it when he does that.

by T$ 225 on Jun 9, 2009 12:31 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

He just goes YOINK

And ganks the ball away from another hopefuly enemy rebounder.

One handed rebounds was the only thing I liked about Magloire.

Oh, and his no-look-dunks.

Mortimer

by Mortimer on Jun 9, 2009 12:34 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I never could figure out the no look dunks

They just blew my mind.

Witty Unpredictable Talent and Natural Game

by iDea on Jun 9, 2009 3:43 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

It was so awesomely lame

You know he thought he was the bees knees doing it.

NOW ITS TIME FOR SUMTHIN’ FOR THE FANS, thinks Magloirable.

Mortimer

by Mortimer on Jun 9, 2009 3:46 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Like i said

If he plays exactly like last year with out fouling all the time he is the perfect center for this team end of story. I am more then willing to see if he can fix the foul problems over the next few years before making any kind of judgement on oden

by kwestfan on Jun 9, 2009 8:07 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Would I make this trade?..

There are two things I wouldn’t do… and this trade is both of them. GO’s potential and the known significance of having a legitimate 7 footer completely rules this trade out. I live Kevin Love and wish him nothing but the best… I think he’d be a good player to have on the roster… but not at the expense of a piece like Oden.

by Ilikeemall on Jun 9, 2009 10:41 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

It's funny how different fan bases react

I’ve been arguing against this from a Wolves perspective, mostly because of the injuries, but people are so extreme.

Love is a terrific player, which seems somewhat lost. He was one of the best rebounders in the league—as a rookie. That counts for something.

What I’m really interested in is how you all view Oden now:

How concerned are you about lingering injury effects? About whether he has the skill to stay healthy? About the lost development time?

Is your main concern with this idea one of “fit” or of raw value?

What, exactly, is Oden’s potential? What do we even mean by that word? From a fan of the NBA, but not the Blazers, I see ALOT of negatives there.

by Eric in Madison on Jun 9, 2009 10:44 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Love is a great rebounder. But so was Oden, also posting 20% rebounding rate - while coming back from injury.

http://www.basketball-reference.com/fc/tiny.cgi?id=E7Z3w

The injuries last year were freak accidents, stepping on someone’s foot twisting and ankle or banging knees can and will happen to about every big man in the league (case in point: The often heralded Andrew Bynum, twice). SVG has his guys wearing kneepads so nobody does it now during the finals.

The microfracture surgery is a thing of concern, but it’s essentially preventive maintenance that can add years to a career later. Amare and Kenyon Martin seem to have come back from it well, right? And Martin had the procedure done in a much larger area.

So injuries are a concern, but not much more than for any guy close to 7 feet tall.

by Norsktroll on Jun 9, 2009 10:56 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

A reaction
How concerned are you about lingering injury effects? About whether he has the skill to stay healthy? About the lost development time?

He made it through this entire year without re-injuring himself.

What skill do you need to stay healthy (besides better getting off the couch skills)?

He’s 21 years old, plenty of time to develop.

by hellsfrozenover on Jun 9, 2009 10:58 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Well, skill might not be the word

you would use, but ability to stay healthy certainly exists. The NBA season is grueling. There are plenty of guys who had the talent to play in the NBA but whose bodies simply could not take the pounding they inevitably got. Not all bones, tendons, muscles, and ligaments are the same.

by Eric in Madison on Jun 9, 2009 11:03 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

How do you feel about Al Jefferson's ability to stay healthy, now that he tore his ACL?

That’s a severe injury for such a heavy dude. Will he ever be the same again?

See, it works both ways :)

by Norsktroll on Jun 9, 2009 11:11 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I love when other teams fans talk bad about oden's injury

especially when their franchise big is hurt. ie, Laker fans. All poke fun of oden, but Bynum has two bum knees and is now reduced to a body to throw at howard

That's right, that's a picture of me with my new bff Joel Przybilla. He said my Billy Idol Karaoke was spot on.

by svlittle on Jun 9, 2009 11:15 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

It's relevant to any trade talk involving Oden.

Which is what this discussion is about.

by Andy G on Jun 9, 2009 11:17 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I don't know why you think this is a gotcha

I’m worried as hell about Jefferson’s ability to stay healthy now that he’s torn his ACL. It sure as hell works for any player, any team. I’m an equal opportunity worrier about injury.

Look, it isn’t universal, but there is a LONG history in the NBA of guys, once they start getting hurt, don’t stop getting hurt. It’s a brutal schedule and bodies take a massive pounding.

by Eric in Madison on Jun 9, 2009 11:17 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

where would Love fit into our line up

he would not start over przybilla and most defiantly not start over Lamarcus Aldridge. He would come off the bench. Why would we trade a guy that could become a cornerstone for a championship team for a guy that would be deep off the bench. Aldridge will continue to play 30-35 minutes a game. Rudy will be the 6th man. Then Batum of Martell, depending on wins the starting job. If we use Love at center,which would be a joke, we would be back in the same position we were in before we drafted Oden, real small and unathletic at center when joel gets tired. What we have now is a luxury few teams have, a center position that is Big, mean and most important, deep. KP will not give that up for some extra rebounds. Besides, rebounds was a strength for us already

That's right, that's a picture of me with my new bff Joel Przybilla. He said my Billy Idol Karaoke was spot on.

by svlittle on Jun 9, 2009 11:29 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

And there are those who are contiually injured and then have long careers

Zydrundris Ilgauskis comes to mind (yes I’m sure I spelled that wrong, but you all know hwo I mean). That guys was injured his first 6-7 years in the league but hasn’t missed a game (or very nearly) the last 4 seasons.

Growing athletes often suffer injuries. What else is new. Muscle grows much faster than bone and so stress fractures happen (an example, not anything that’s hurt Oden). The point is once a guy phyically matures injuries are much less common except in accidents. So far Oden has had two accidents. As he is more aware of his body he will probably see fewer of those as well. Most people are very out of touch with their physical presence (try a martial art sometime).

All that aside, Greg has played very well. He played Yao very respectably man to man towards the end of the playoff series with Houston. Joel didn’t fair as well. The point is Greg is a keeper even with the injuries as we still have a capable backup.

Do you think LAL would take #8 and Love for Bynum? I don’t think so either. It’s not just Blazer fans that are partial to their big men. Love is more polished at this point but he will not be close to Oden in a few years.

by NWfan on Jun 9, 2009 2:51 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

We are worried about Al's knee.

But we also figure he’ll be able to recover because his game is based on skill, footwork and superior scoring instincts, as opposed to athleticism or superior jumping ability (a la Amare). Having said that, I say a little prayer for Big Al’s knee every day.

by princelyfrank on Jun 10, 2009 11:44 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Oden was just as good a rebounder, and mo'

As an out of shape rookie?

Oden DID affect the game on both ends of the court many nights, and his PER and per-36 numbers are purty nice for any rookie, let alone one coming off a bad injury.

Of course I worry that the knee will give him problems down the line, but it isn’t right now and that is a very good sign. The other injuries are either mundane normal injuries (sprained ankle) or from years ago and healed (the wrist). They aren’t injuries where one led to the other.

Oden makes the other team get in foul trouble, intimidates on the defensive end, and gives you an inside presence who no one can guard RIGHT NOW, as a guy with no post moves, because he is so big and strong. He’s just on another plane than Love, who is a good player in his own right.

It’s not about fit (it’s a bad fit for Love here, but it ain’t about that). It’s about Oden being a more impactful player already, while at the same time being MUCH less skilled and developed than Love is. And more out of shape and uncoordinated.

There is a lot left for Oden to become… he isn’t anywhere close to being finished, and he’s already pretty good. He just needs to stay on the floor, which better conditioning should solve.

Mortimer

by Mortimer on Jun 9, 2009 11:05 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

needs to be said that, Oden was *not* just as good a rebounder (he was close, but Love was better by a non-trivial amount)

Also, Love’s PER was better, and he played many more minutes.

I generally agree with your post, but the beginning was misleading.

by jksnake99 on Jun 9, 2009 11:10 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I'm not really sure it was non-trivial.

Love was third among players with 500+ minutes while Oden was eighth in rebound rate. That’s the difference between 21.0% and 20.0%.

Looking at each end of the court, Oden’s ORB% is slightly higher at 0.6%. Love’s DRB% is higher by 2.8%. However, Portland was a better rebounding team, posting a higher ORB% by 4.9% and an even DRB% with Minnesota. The difference is likely less than the 1.0% difference in TRB% because of diminishing returns.

Both had a huge positive rebounding impact on their teams as well. Minnesota rebounded better by 6.1% on offense and 2.0% on defense. Portland rebounded better by 6.0% on offense and -0.8% on defense. With that defensive rebounding, it should be noted that Przybilla leads the league in DRB%. I would argue that there wasn’t a large difference in rebounding between the two.

I’d also say there really isn’t any difference between 18.3 PER and 18.1 PER since that’s about one subpar game’s worth of difference. The minutes difference is undeniable. I’m just being an Oden backer right now though. 8P

by poster on Jun 9, 2009 3:29 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I would argue...

although I don’t know how to prove it, that Oden contributes to the team getting rebounds more than Love overall. He boxes out bigs incredibly well which makes it less likely that the apposing team snatches up a rebound even if Oden doesn’t get it himself.

You would see it all the time where Oden throws a body on someone and it allows space for one of the other guys to get the rebound. The fact that Portland is a better overall rebounding team says something, although I’m sure Joel had something to do with that. Anyway, my point is that even though Love technically posted a better rebounding %, I would be willing to bet Portland would be worse team rebounding wise if they traded places.

Roy is the best player in the world with the exception of Incarcerated Mike from Queensbridge .

by Nick Van Excellent on Jun 10, 2009 12:01 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

While Jefferson's injury somewhat muddles the situation

the stats actually say otherwise. We were a slightly worse defensive rebounding team with Greg in (getting 0.8% fewer of the available defensive boards) and the Wolves got 2% more of available the defensive boards with Love in (both guys had a similar effect for the team on the offensive glass).

The reason that Jefferson’s injury screws things up is that both guys started off the season trading time with an elite defensive rebounder. Of course, it’s just a hard comparison overall talking about what Love would do on our team. I think it’s difficult to argue that Love as a rebounder wasn’t at least in Oden’s class, though, if not better. If we’d just be going on size, you could just as easily argue that LaMarcus is a better rebounder than Millsap, which would be laughable.

by Royster on Jun 10, 2009 9:56 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

So are you penalizing Oden because he plays the minutes

Przybilla (the #1 boarder in the entire NBA) doesn’t? It seems to me the +/- on that situation for Oden is bleak for that number no matter what he did. Something else to note is that Oden as far as team rebounding goes was by far the #1 guy in the league.

We grabbed 110 out of every 200 rebounds available.
http://www.82games.com/0809/08POR15.HTM#bypos

The next best guy in the league was Kevin Love, but he only got 107.6.
http://www.82games.com/0809/RESORT17.HTM

As you can tell, it seems like all of our players are the beneficiaries of Przybilla and Oden’s extraordinary rebounding abilities.

I don’t think you can make an argument for Love as being a superior boarder to Oden, but you could say they’re both in the upper tier. The fact Oden was doing this stuff while still running out on perimeter players, and constantly being used on screens 20+ feet away from the basket, the year after micro-fracture surgery says maybe we didn’t even get to see the best of Oden’s boarding abilities As most of us acknowledge there is plenty of room still for the big man to grow and improve.

by as11osu on Jun 10, 2009 10:30 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Along the same lines, you're penalizing Love

for playing alongside a bunch of terrible rebounders once Jefferson was out. Maybe I should have qualified the statement to reflect that we can only judge performance from last year, hence the “wasn’t at least in Oden’s class”, rather than “isn’t at least in Oden’s class”.

Not having watched enough of the Wolves this year, I can’t comment on Love’s positioning on the defensive end relative to Greg’s, which just seems like nitpicking anyways since the stats I was bringing up had to do with team rebounding.

The issue was that Kevin Love helped his team’s defensive rebounding as much or more than Greg, which was responding to Nick’s point that “Oden had a much greater effect on defensive rebounding for us than Love did for the Wolves” because he boxed out guys and that didn’t show up in the stats sheet while Love just got boards.

The whole point with Joel and Al was to illustrate that they’re both guys who suck up defensive boards, so it was a roughly equivalent situation. It’s not like Love was backing up Frye or something. The thing that muddles the whole situation is Al’s injury and 82games lack of data organized by season splits.

by Royster on Jun 10, 2009 10:50 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

This is the sort of reaction I wanted to get...

when I posted the idea. I think it would be a risk for the Wolves, due to Oden’s injuries, but a risk that is definitely worth taking, because Oden could be the centerpiece of a champion, and Love and whoever gets picked #6 are not going to be in that category.

Our fans at Canis have an unbelievably high impression of Love that I do not share. I consider him a quality power forward that happens to be a little undersized, and happens to play next to an equally undersized center. It’s an odd fit that was very controversially formed by trading away OJ Mayo last June.

It’s my hope that David Kahn is less enthused about McHale’s Smallball plan than, well, McHale was, and he feels free to engage in trade talks that involve Love. While going after Oden is very aggressive and unlikely, it’s the type of idea that I’d rather see us pursue than simply dumping Mike Miller’s contract for a slightly above-average veteran. I don’t see us making any serious ground in that scenario that wouldn’t occur with the natural progressions of Love, Jefferson and Foye.

by Andy G on Jun 9, 2009 10:55 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

This year will be telling

I think if you ask the same question next year at this time, I suspect we will truly know the answer. If Oden struggles with a major injury (e.g. 25+ games missed) this year and does not progress as much as we hope, there will be a collective groan from us Blazer faithful and we will need to face some unpleasant truths about our big man. Personally, I do not feel that will be his fate and that he will likely average 65+ games per season through his career, which would be a reasonable number for someone of his size. I also expect he will have a very good year due to increased conditioning and athleticism as many posters have mentioned above. If the latter is the case, the question will be moot.

by Cyclops@Centercourt on Jun 9, 2009 11:15 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I agree...

this is a big year for Oden. He should be 100% healthy and without any excuses for fouling out of every game. I think he’ll have a great season but if not, you’ll get a lot less than Kevin Love and a lottery pick for him in a trade.

by Andy G on Jun 9, 2009 1:10 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

On draft day KP said there was only one player he would trade Oden for.

My bet is that is still very close to true today as well. Lebron, yes, Howard, maybe. Anyone else, save your breath.

by NWfan on Jun 9, 2009 2:55 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

is a bit extreme

I’d a gone with Cp3, Howard, or Lebron.

by Zaig on Jun 9, 2009 4:17 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I'm not sure....

I think he would wait to see how Oden progresses. Big men are hard to find

by GreatOden'sRaven on Jun 9, 2009 4:58 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

He'd jump at it

Paul is a top 5 player.

Witty Unpredictable Talent and Natural Game

by iDea on Jun 9, 2009 9:23 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

mmmm.... I'd ...hesitate. this is where the nasty "rule" comes in....

YOU DON’T TRADE A BIG FOR A SMA…. lol… k k … it’s a bogus clecheeee or however you spell it, but still…

I’d have trouble with it …….

The Faith don't panic, the faith freaks out, burns out farms, and torchs small villages in the name of The Faith.

by faith on Jun 9, 2009 9:26 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Top 3

Lebron 1
Paul/Wade 2-3
Howard 4
Kobe 5

by Zaig on Jun 10, 2009 9:26 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I actually agree with top 3

But I figured top 5 is nearly unanimous, so I left a little wiggle room for the naysayers.

Witty Unpredictable Talent and Natural Game

by iDea on Jun 11, 2009 8:15 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

So are point guards who are producing seasons that draw comparisons to Magic Johnson

That Steve Nash is exactly the same as Kirk Hinrich, but worse.
by NBA Observer on Apr 8, 2009 12:23 PM CDT

by Ozzie Montana on Jun 9, 2009 9:51 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

They draw comparisons

but not wins.

"You're welcome friend
I love you."
- Tom "Dragline" inHawaii

by 92wastheyear on Jun 10, 2009 12:59 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

huh? He took an utterly craptastic Hornet team to 49 wins. Sean Marks and Hilton Armstrong were the frontcourt for a good portion of the season.

proud hinrichsheeple

by Cablinasian on Jun 10, 2009 2:59 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I know ....but I always hear stuff like this

Blake’s team gets 54 wins and it is because the other players are great. CP3 gets 49 and it is in spite of the crappy players around him. If elite point guards are so important to winning big……why don’t more of them do it (regardless of the talent around them)? Look at the points in the conference finals for instance. Not exactly the HOF class of 2020. Then look at CP3, Williams, Rose and Parker ….all first round fodder…just like Blake.

Just sayin’

"You're welcome friend
I love you."
- Tom "Dragline" inHawaii

by 92wastheyear on Jun 10, 2009 3:11 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

If you only focus on this year, sure

Last year, three out of the four conference finalists and 6 out of 8 second rounders had great PGs (Rondo, Nelson (borderline), Parker, Billups, CP, DWill).

Two years ago, three out of four conference finalists and 6 out of 8 second rounders had great PGs (Baron, DWill, Parker, Billups, Nash, Kidd).

Three years ago, two out of four conference finalists and 5 out of 8 second rounders had great PGs (Kidd, Cassell, Nash, Parker, Billups, not including Devin Harris here, either).

Four years ago, three out of four conference finalists and 4 out of 8 second rounders had great PGs (Arenas, Parker, Billups, Nash).

I could go on, but I think concluding that good PGs don’t win in the playoffs solely because this year they got knocked out in the first round is ridiculous (only Rondo and Billups were guys playing at a top level who advanced).

by Royster on Jun 10, 2009 3:35 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

And only Rondo and Parker have rings

out of all of those. And the general consensus is that they aren’t the best 2 of the group you mention

"You're welcome friend
I love you."
- Tom "Dragline" inHawaii

by 92wastheyear on Jun 10, 2009 3:49 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I think the biggest lesson is

Like with most positions, you WANT the best you can get there, but the League’s Best PG usually doesn’t win the title because the team is built around him instead of more traditionally dominant positions.

AND, you can win with an average PG whose skills fill in what your main players need help with. Or, if your main players are flat out dominant and amazing.

I don’t hold it against Chris Paul that he is the best PG and I truly believe his team would be THE LEAGUE’S ABSOLUTE WORST team without him; leading that team to 49 wins is extremely impressive. They are awful.

It’s just that, it’s much more likely you’ll be in championship talks with a super dominant big man or a perimeter scoring/playmaking non-PG wing, than the league’s best PG. For whatever reason, it often seems like teams that are led by a wing who isn’t the PG but initiates the most (or at least the most important) possessions, does the best. Perhaps it’s having more than 1 good playmaker, I dunno— but that’s what it has been for my lifetime.

But Magic, Isiah, they won titles. Nash almost coulda’ maybe won one. It’s just the luck of the draw right now. Paul won’t win one in New Orleans, they’re gonna be too bad before he’ll want out. The best PG can win a title, but the team has to be built better because the best PG won’t lead an entire team to the promised land like someone like Lebron can do.

Mortimer

by Mortimer on Jun 10, 2009 3:54 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

as always......+92

"You're welcome friend
I love you."
- Tom "Dragline" inHawaii

by 92wastheyear on Jun 10, 2009 4:05 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

On that note

Not even Lebron can lead a crappy team to a title.

Teams need balance. They need more than a superstar, they need a few stars around him to help carry the load. Unbalanced teams, like the Hornets, don’t typically win. Paul is undoubtedly the best pg in the league right now. They went to the WCF last season with only Chandler and West, who in my opinion, are vastly overrated. This season, injury’s did them in because they have no depth. Winning 49 games was an accomplishment.

Witty Unpredictable Talent and Natural Game

by iDea on Jun 11, 2009 8:22 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Correction

Spurs went to the west finals (not that this changes your point)

"You're welcome friend
I love you."
- Tom "Dragline" inHawaii

by 92wastheyear on Jun 11, 2009 9:21 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

yeah but

even Magic and Isiah had dominant big men with them.
Kareem and Bill Laimbeer.

SO, like I believe you were trying to say, it takes a big man to get there and win there (there being the NBA finals.)

by ECFIVESTER on Jun 11, 2009 9:24 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I pretty much agree

I’m just saying, that even though the best PG in the NBA types haven’t won a title as the main piece of their team since Isiah, it doesn’t preclude them from being able to do so or mean that they WON’T.

BUT, to me, the best big man almost ALWAYS beats the best PG or best perimeter player.

Like iDea says above, you need balance and guys filling their roles and a good amount of depth to surround even the greatest of talents.

Morty

by Mortimer on Jun 11, 2009 10:33 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

True

Balance is key.
As I noted earlier, in another comment, I was just pointing out that in the NBA the teams that win the Championship have Hall of Fame Centers (and yes I am including you too, Tim Duncan). And it is far and away the exception to the rule for a team to win the championship without one. Obviously it can be done, if your Michael Jordan.

But like you said balance and the best big man almost always trumps the best wing player.

by ECFIVESTER on Jun 11, 2009 1:33 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

The "Best" anything

hasn’t won (except for Duncan) since Shaq. The best SG in the game from 2004 through 2008 was Kobe, and he didn’t win a ring in that time. The best SF from 2005 on has been LeBron, and he hasn’t won a ring. Obviously between CP3 and Nash the best PG hasn’t won a ring, the best center hasn’t won a ring since the Lakers, and every other year, the best PF hasn’t won a ring. PGs, just like any position, need help. When guys are stuck on teams with no one else, they don’t win (see KG in Minny, Kobe before Gasol, LeBron in Cleveland, MJ before Pippen, Robinson before Duncan, Shaq before Kobe, T-Mac his entire career, VC in Toronto, et al). I don’t see how this makes them any different. The truly great players at any position can drag teams along by themselves, but almost always lose at some point in the playoffs because teams can game plan around them entirely, the lone exception being Duncan in 2003, which was simply the greatest playoff performance ever.

PGs are so out of vogue now because for the 20 years previous to Chris Paul, there hadn’t been a truly transcendent PG. Kidd was close, and he did manage to drag two terrible Nets teams to the finals where they ran into two buzz saws in the form of Shaq and Duncan, and Nash was ultimately too one-dimensional to be considered an all timer. The closest thing was the criminally underrated Stockton, who was only denied by the GOAT.

Consider in that same time span we’ve seen, two of the top three SGs ever (Jordan and someone I refuse to name), three of the top ten centers ever (Hakeem, Robinson, Shaq), and four top ten all-time PFs, including the best ever (Duncan, Mailman, KG, Sir Charles), is it really surprising that those positions have dominated winning rings in recent history?

Recently, though, there’s been an explosion of young PG talent. CP is almost definitely going to be an all-timer. DWill could become the Drexler to his Jordan. Rose and Rondo could both be threats to be in that kind of conversation. None of those guys are more than a month older than Roy. I just don’t see how you can look at how the league is trending and not think that PGs will be MUCH more important in the near future than they are now.

by Royster on Jun 10, 2009 8:22 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Those are all good points

However, I would still point out that since 1990 (Isiah Thomas) no team that has won the NBA championship has had a PG as it’s best player. If you are talking about a league trend ……that is pretty long one

(one possible exception is that you might feel that Billups was the best player on the Pistons team that won…..if so that’s cool)

"You're welcome friend
I love you."
- Tom "Dragline" inHawaii

by 92wastheyear on Jun 10, 2009 8:44 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

And until Jordan, the league had gone 30 years

before a SG had been the best player on a title team. Now, it’s almost a requirement.

by Royster on Jun 10, 2009 9:07 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

CP3 the next Jordan?

I know that is glib ….but it is kinda what you are saying in way….that one of these guys will be the trend buster. We will find out, I guess, but I am still leaning towards a SG w/ a dominant big formula (or vice versa) until I see different

"You're welcome friend
I love you."
- Tom "Dragline" inHawaii

by 92wastheyear on Jun 10, 2009 9:15 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

My point is that

there’s been an unprecedented dearth of PG talent in the last 20 years while we’ve seen, arguably three of the top 7 SGs of all time, and 4 of the top 7 or 8 PFs of all time, and potentially another top 10 guy with Dirk. It’s not that PGs don’t win titles, it’s that the best players win titles, and that we’ve seen exactly one PG since the mid-90’s who would qualify as one of the top 2-3 players in the league (Nash’s jokes of MVPs notwithstanding).

You could make the exact same argument that LeBron will never win a title because there hasn’t been an SF to lead his team to a title since Bird, but it’d be ridiculous because LeBron is 24 years old and the best player in the game. Look at the great players under 25, almost all are PGs except for Roy, Dwight, and LeBron. This is the first time we’ve seen this kind of influx of talent since Isiah, Magic, Stockton, and Porter entered the league, and those guys combined for 7 titles and at least one finals appearance in nearly every year in the 80s and early 90s.

by Royster on Jun 10, 2009 10:02 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Duncan had Robinson in 2003

still. that was Robinson’s last year.

by ECFIVESTER on Jun 11, 2009 1:35 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Check out the playoff stats

he also technically had Parker, Ginobili, and Stephen Jackson, but everyone was flat out terrible in the playoffs.

Duncan led the team in points, boards, and assists (averaging 10 more points, 9 more boards, and 2 more assists than anyone else). None of the 2-5 scorers averaged more than 15 ppg, or shot higher than 42%, and they managed to dethrone a Lakers team with both Kobe and Shaq (admittedly starting to feud by then) coming off a three-peat. You replace Duncan with an average PF at the time (say Abdur-Rahim), and that team gets swept in the first round.

by Royster on Jun 11, 2009 2:01 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

If this happened (it won't)

we can kiss our Championship dreams goodbye.

Certified blazer.fangirl

by Roybot on Jun 9, 2009 10:56 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

I'm not sure what prompts you to say that specifically, but I agree

I’m not arguing that a title is destined with Oden, but is Love the guy to get us over the hump? I think not. Neither is the #6 in this draft.

by T$ 225 on Jun 9, 2009 12:27 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Kevin Love is a turncoat son of a seacook

That's right, that's a picture of me with my new bff Joel Przybilla. He said my Billy Idol Karaoke was spot on.

by svlittle on Jun 9, 2009 11:17 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

That's not the point at all

Who cares about that? He is not a good enough player by any means to trade for Oden.

by Sabonis4Ever on Jun 9, 2009 4:49 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I doubt KP is listening to trade offers for Oden

The Blazers think he will develop into their championship center.

Who do you trade your championship center for?

by baduk on Jun 9, 2009 11:17 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

I still don't see it working

how often does trading big for small work out?

That's right, that's a picture of me with my new bff Joel Przybilla. He said my Billy Idol Karaoke was spot on.

by svlittle on Jun 9, 2009 11:34 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I have to say...

Blazers Edge is a breath of fresh air compared to O live. It’s good to see intelligent opinions instead of insults and name calling. Sure sorry I wasted all last year over there instead of here with real fans… Thanks for the change!

by Ilikeemall on Jun 9, 2009 11:52 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

No...

….because the Wolves don’t need to trade for anyone to get a guy who can foul everyone in the stadium. They can just tell Madsen to do that for much less. ;) Wait, I just saw something out the window…did Greg Oden just foul my mailman?

In all seriousness, I don’t think this happens either way. Oden has worlds of potential and until they get an idea of whether or not he’s simply a defensive/rebounding kind of guy (when he’s not fouling little kids in the stands) or someone with the complete package, I don’t think they’d trade the guy. Love is a unique player but Oden has a chance to be something much more valuable to the Blazers than Love would be…regardless of their individual talents. I kind of get the sense that in the long run, most of the offense with the Blazers will be LMA, Roy, an Bayless/point guard to be traded for while the 3 spot jacks up 3s and rebounds and the center rebounds and plays the role of Mr. Bad Ass. Love is a going to be a great player but I don’t think he’s going to be Mr. Bad Ass.

I do think that a package with Batum, Pryz, and…well, the Wolves need to walk away from this draft with a lead guard. I think the 3 way potential between the Bulls, Blazers, and Wolves is off the charts and if I were Kahn I’d be looking for a long guy who could play the 2 and 3 as well as a way to walk away with a pick that I know would get me Ty Lawson or Jonny Flynn if I’m giving up the 6 and Love.

The World's Leading Exporter of Small Area Quickness
www.canishoopus.com

by Stop-n-Pop on Jun 9, 2009 12:03 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Yeah, at the very least

Oden and Love mean a lot more to their respective teams than to the other, which is a huge reason alone why the deal isn’t likely to happen.

All of the merits of the debate on either side are mostly moot after that.

Mortimer

by Mortimer on Jun 9, 2009 12:08 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Oden is exactly what Portland needs, even if he’s just a pick and roll finisher and garbageman on offense. His rebounding and defense are sorely needed on a team with Aldridge, Roy, etc.

This is a good way of looking at it.

I know you think Minnesota, Chicago, and Portland could work… that is implying Hinrich to Portland, yes? I want a Kirk Hinrich for Christmas.

proud hinrichsheeple

by Cablinasian on Jun 9, 2009 2:05 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I don't know which way they would be...

….divvied up, but Hinrich, Deng, Batum, Pryz, Love, and Miller are two from each team that could start things off.

The World's Leading Exporter of Small Area Quickness
www.canishoopus.com

by Stop-n-Pop on Jun 9, 2009 2:44 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Is this just guessing or did you match salaries..

that is a very interesting idea.. if love and miller are leaving, who are hoping to get back?

by GreatOden'sRaven on Jun 9, 2009 4:49 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Just guessing...

…that they would be at the core of any action between these 3 teams. I can’t see any team parting with much more other than a few picks. Anything else and you have to start including guys like Jefferson, Noah, and LMA and that just isn’t going to happen.

The World's Leading Exporter of Small Area Quickness
www.canishoopus.com

by Stop-n-Pop on Jun 9, 2009 6:09 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Your jokes about Oden's fouling are really funny.

I haven’t heard any of them before. So original.

Certified blazer.fangirl

by Roybot on Jun 9, 2009 2:37 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Thanks for the lunch time laugh...

But really, I’m amazed but not surprised at how overblown the Oden injury thing is for fans outside of PDX. More than likely because every one of his injuries have been high profile. He was hurt on the highly touted first game against the Lakers. He was hurt just before the All-Star game and missed that. Combine that with the enormous hype he’s received and it’s understandable that casual observers might think he’s far less a player than originally touted.

Nevertheless, looking at the effect he has on the game, I’ll take him playing 60 – 70 regular season games and being healthy for the playoffs every year over K. Love and who ever is available at #6 for the next 10 years without batting an eye.

by LaughingJon on Jun 9, 2009 12:50 PM PDT reply actions   1 recs

If we were willing to trade Oden for Love (which we're not)

Minny should back out, because you know we would be screwing you over AGAIN

C*mcast sucks!

by Blazermaniac77 on Jun 9, 2009 12:57 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

My favorite quote from the twolves blog

“I appreciate the spirit, and I think you knew you’d probably get some strong reactions out of this, but if we’re giving up Love and the sixth for anyone it’s got to be CP3 or similar.”

by raging WebTed on Jun 9, 2009 1:17 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Bahahahaha!

Love + #6 in a weak draft gets you no where near CP3 level

What’re they smoking out there in Minny?

The NBA: Where Amazingly Bad Officiating Happens.

by The Roybot on Jun 9, 2009 1:55 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

And we talk about overvaluing our players

Seriously… Kevin Love isn’t that good

The NBA: Where Amazingly Bad Officiating Happens.

by The Roybot on Jun 9, 2009 2:04 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Try telling that

to a guy named Jose Cordoba over at Canis Hoopus. He would rather have Love on his team than LMA

"And once again we can say, it's a GREAT day to be a Blazer."- Brian Wheeler

by lrh86 on Jun 9, 2009 2:09 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I think that would be understandable

Love had a good rookie year, and even if I disagree with it I can see where he is coming from.

Good-and-should-improve shooter, great passer, great rebounder, there are things to like. We got plenty of people who prefer LMA over Bosh, where Bosh is clearly a better player in most ways. There are things Love does better than LMA, and if those are what you favor more then you’ll like Love more.

Thinking only a SUPERSTAR is enough to drag him away, though, is way overrating him. Or, to a lesser extent, taking his similar-to-Oden’s rookie year as a positive in the argument of Oden vs Love.

Mortimer

by Mortimer on Jun 9, 2009 2:19 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I'm one of those people

Bosh got 3pts & 3 rebs. more then LA last year on a bad team where he was the focal point. I dont see him getting the same numbers on a good team like the blazers. Put LA in Toronto his #’s go up across the board

by We-B-Dunkin on Jun 10, 2009 9:21 AM PDT up reply actions   1 recs

It's like when KG went to the Celts

His scoring & rebounding both went down but the W’s went up

by We-B-Dunkin on Jun 10, 2009 9:29 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Isn't that a Celtics fan?

At least I know I had seen him comment there

by Norsktroll on Jun 9, 2009 2:30 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I would rather have Love than LMA

Love showed in college that he can consistently hit jumpers. He did not show this skill in his first year. Love is already a better rebounder than LMA by leaps and bounds. Both players are equally soft on D.

I like this quote by Hollinger assessing LMA’s prospects for this season

If this guy were any softer you’d use him to blow your nose. Aldridge has the size and length to be an outstanding rebounder and defender, but he willingly concedes prime post position and allows opponents to push him around under the basket. Given his size advantage at power forward he’s also a frustratingly mediocre rebounder, especially on the defensive glass where he was only 40th out of 62 power forwards.

If Love can improve his outside shot, he’ll do what LMA does while still being the superior passer and rebounder. His past history to me shows he will likely improve his outside shot. Rebounding is a skill that usually is never improved, you either have it or you don’t, Oden and Love have it, LMA does not.

Why the infatuation with LMA? I like the Blazers, love BRoy, think they have a great foundation and I live in Seattle so they are the closest thing I have to NBA basketball, but I just don’t see what’s so great about LMA

by Ebomb on Jun 9, 2009 2:41 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

LMA = Mehmet Okur

Nice players that can serve a role on a winning team, nothing more.

by Ebomb on Jun 9, 2009 2:43 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Trusting Hollinger's non-numbers analysis isn't always the best idea

LMA has developed a very dependable post game. He is much stronger now on both ends of the court, and is not NEARLY as soft as the skilled-eye of Hollinger believes.

He is not a good rebounder though, which Hollinger can see from the numbers telling him what to see. Love totally outclasses him there.

LMA’s versatile scoring ability and versatile ability to guard almost any position on defense make him a valuable two-way player with even more potential to mine. He isn’t perfect, he isn’t a superstar, but I’ll take him over a 6’8" really slow and unathletic guy who is good at passing and rebounding but only gets to use one of those skills regularly.

LMA had some great defensive moments and is getting consistent on that end as he gains more strength. He’s already a really good perimeter defender, gets a lot of deflections and strips. Love is not physically capable of becoming a better defender since he will always be undersized and slow.

Love is good, and he does what he does very well. But he is a guy who has the skill and guile of a veteran, and his body will never match it. That sort doesn’t build with potential like other young players, they start out good and stay consistently good. And with his size disadvantage, he will always be outclassed by the truly good PFs in the league.

Not saying LMA is one of the best PFs, but he doesn’t get abused on defense by any of the premiere PFs and holds his opponents to a pretty good PER. He doesn’t help on the weakside nearly as much as he should, but he does most of everything else he should do on defense, and he has improved on it consistently.

Love’s raw goods just aren’t good enough to become a more than a star role player.

Most Blazer fans see how LMA has improved, saw his improved strength and actual beastliness during the post-Allstar game part of the year, see how hard he works before and after games and during the offseason, and like how he fits next to Oden and Roy. He won’t likely be on the same level as them, but he’s a good fit.

Love could potentially be a good fit next to Oden with his potential for a good jumper and passing ability, but he’ll always have to be compensated for defensively.

I think most of us envision LMA is a really good co-star.

Mortimer

by Mortimer on Jun 9, 2009 2:56 PM PDT up reply actions   1 recs

A few things

One, numbers like PER, WOW, Adjusted +/- are tools to help us understand players where our perceived biases may change our judgments.

Like for instance, you’ll take LMA over a 6’8" really slow and unathletic guy. That’s fine, that’s what you think. I can back and throw out the two players combine numbers that say the following. Love’s standing vertical 29.5" compared to LMA 26.5". Love’s max vert 35" to LMA’s 34". Love was over a second faster in the agility drill and ran the 3/4 court sprint .22 seconds faster than LMA. What does this say about your ability to judge athletcism? Under every objective measurement Love is a better athlete. LMA clearly is longer, with a longer standing reach, and that definitely is a positive. But just because you say its so, doesn’t mean it is so.

by Ebomb on Jun 9, 2009 3:04 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

That was a few years ago and LMA had never trained and was injured

He runs better than almost any PF, his vertical is higher than that now, and he is MUCH stronger.

I trust what I see over a few years old scouting report.

Love is not very athletic at all, and that should be clear. He is under 6’8" without shoes, he has short arms, is extremely slow running up and down the court, and cannot stay with quicker opponents close to the basket or on the perimeter. That is not opinion, that is what he is.

You really think Love runs the court better than LMA? Like, that is your actual opinion?

Mortimer

by Mortimer on Jun 9, 2009 3:06 PM PDT up reply actions   1 recs

How can I argue

With your “eye test.” It’s impossible. Kevin Love may look more tired running down the court than LMA. Clearly Kevin Love is fatter than LMA, during the test numbers that I quoted, Love’s body fat was 12%, LMA’s was 8.7. While one may “look” more athletic than the other, unless I have my stopwatch on the court, how do I know which one was faster. They were both timed prior to the NBA draft, those numbers don’t lie. LMA may have been injured, may have a lot of things, but numbers don’t lie.

by Ebomb on Jun 9, 2009 3:10 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

That was over 3 years ago

There has not been a post-draft camp to point to, but surely you admit your numbers for LMA are severely outdated and are contrary to what any scout or basketbally afficianado would say when watching LMA and his current level of athleticism.

Surely.

M.

by Mortimer on Jun 9, 2009 3:11 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Just watching LMA playing againt Love

And Love’s struggles playing against a longer and more athletic player should be easily enough to see.

M.

by Mortimer on Jun 9, 2009 3:13 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I don't think those numbers are outdated

I don’t think people gain athleticism in thier mid 20’s. I think the fun part about posting on these boards, reading aggregated statistics, watching baksetball of many different teams with League Pass, is the fact I get to make my own judgments.

As long as were going with the traditional scouting methods, I think most scouts would agree that LMA can’t play defense, that Love is already the better help defender.

by Ebomb on Jun 9, 2009 3:17 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

People get in better shape

Or have better days, or recover from injuries, which is what LMA was doing.

I would disagree with what you think the scouts would say, but that is fine.

Love is a good player who does what he does well, but he’ll always suffer from his size and slowness. That’s the MAIN point I’m trying to make and coming off ranty about ;-)

Morty

by Mortimer on Jun 9, 2009 3:20 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Take pre-draft measurements with a grain of salt

Look through the draft express database and compared some of those vertical and timed numbers between players. Its rather laughable.

I barely trust height and reach measurements. For example this year, all 3 Tarheels who declared the previous year and backed out, improved their height by .5 inch this year. What are the chances 3 random individuals grew .5 inches. Believe it or not, the measurements were taken at 6am this year. This distorts the height measurements since the human body is at its tallest in the morning.

"I'm at the thingamajig talking the yakety-yak" - Kenny Smith

by blzrfan on Jun 9, 2009 3:25 PM PDT up reply actions   1 recs

This makes KLove even taller

Since he was measured in the afternoon.

by Ebomb on Jun 9, 2009 3:28 PM PDT up reply actions   1 recs

What?!

No. This year’s draft was the anomaly. Most prospects measured out much more favorably than anticipated. I suspect the 6 am measurement helped.

The previous draft measurements were taken at the Orlando draft combine and not measured at 6am. Those are more accurate than this year’s measurement.

"I'm at the thingamajig talking the yakety-yak" - Kenny Smith

by blzrfan on Jun 9, 2009 3:31 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

That's what I was saying

And sarcastically at that. I should have instead cited that the players in this year’s draft are shorter rather the players in the drafts of the past being taller based on their measurements.

It’s why Hansbrough looks to have acceptable length for a PF and why Griffin doesn’t like a SF :)

by Ebomb on Jun 9, 2009 3:33 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yes...I get you now.

=]

"I'm at the thingamajig talking the yakety-yak" - Kenny Smith

by blzrfan on Jun 9, 2009 3:36 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I think that most would agree

than LMA is one of the best PF’s at switching to cover a PG or wing in the NBA.

Come on you gotta listen unto me,
lay off that whiskey and let that cocaine be. ~Johnny Cash

by HurraKane212 on Jun 9, 2009 3:45 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

certainly players get more athletic in their 20s

they work out part time in college, in the NBA they work out EVERYDAY.. jump higher, run faster..

by GreatOden'sRaven on Jun 9, 2009 4:52 PM PDT up reply actions   1 recs

Dude, you

I'm a really really ridiculously good looking orange mocha frappaccino drinking manhammer sandwich

by hobobob on Jun 10, 2009 11:04 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

that didn't turn out right, and now i have to go

that wasn’t attacking or anything, just ran out of time

I'm a really really ridiculously good looking orange mocha frappaccino drinking manhammer sandwich

by hobobob on Jun 10, 2009 11:04 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Monta Ellis had pre-draft camp numbers that didn't accurately reflect his athleticism either.

http://www.draftexpress.com/nba-pre-draft-measurements/?page=&year=2005&sort2=DESC&draft=0&pos=0&sort=

The numbers don’t lie, but unlike the numbers for length and height, athleticism can be improved for some people, and if everything we’ve seen since the pre-draft tests run contrary to their numbes, then we can safely assume it was a ‘bad day’ or some other reason why the player did so poorly.

In the games, against other opponents, after they are in the NBA, is the best way to measure athleticism.

Mortimer

by Mortimer on Jun 9, 2009 3:17 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Look

This wasn’t necessarily a rip on Alridge, he may have been hurt, I have no idea, the point I was trying to make with these numbers is that Kevin Love is not unathletic. His standing jump and max vertical are above average for a PF. Let’s stop talking about LMA because it’s clear we disagree, but can you agree that Love is ahtletic?

by Ebomb on Jun 9, 2009 3:19 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

His level of athleticism is good enough

I worry that a player so small, his athleticism has to be ELITE to compensate for it. And, to have more length to avoid getting his shot blocked so much (a big problem for Love this season).

That’s not to say someone can’t overcome it, but Love has a lot going against him physically.

He is very skilled, an amazing passer, and I think he’ll be able to shoot again. But I never saw him able to stay with any other good PF in the league, I watched the Wolves plenty on League Pass. His lower body will get stronger and he’ll add experience, but he’ll always be shorter and more ground bound and slower than opposing PFs.

An undersized PF would do well for himself if he could run well and make it hard for bigger PFs to keep up with him, but Love isn’t good at running the floor. He could use a more mobile big man next to him to be on the finishing end of the outlets Love starts, but I worry more about a big man who can challenge dribble penetration, which isn’t a strength of Love.

I would rather keep Love over Jefferson, even without Jefferson’s injury. Love tries harder on defense and has a much more versatile offensive game. His rebounding and passing is awesome. I’m not saying he is bad at ALL, just that his body will always hold him back compared to the bigger and stronger and faster PFs of today.

It’s not like he’s a fat cow waddling up and down the court, but compared to most of the star PFs of today, he is pretty unathletic.

His skill and veteran-like guile help him overcome it as a rookie, but I worry about how much room he has left to grow and whether it is possible to make up for his physical deficiencies. Most 20 year old PFs don’t have the skill Love has and make up for it with elite athleticism, and Love is the reverse.

It will be interesting how he turns out, and I don’t have the innate hatred toward Love that a lot of Portlanders have since I don’t care he went to UCLA ;-)

Mortimer

by Mortimer on Jun 9, 2009 3:39 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

All good points

Love clearly has some weight to lose, and is the reverse conditioning part as most young guys need to add strenght to boyish bodies, Love needs to do aerobic excercise while maintaining strength and losing weight. Both are hard to do.

The fact that Love’s game is more cerebral than most rookies gives me confidence that he will figure out how to score more effectively against longer players, clearly a weakness currently. However, this weakness led to him drawing a very large number of fouls and getting the line at an extremely high level, something I don’t want to see him lose. Drawing fouls, and drawing free throw attempts, especially when you shoot free throws well, are key components to Love’s value.

by Ebomb on Jun 9, 2009 3:48 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I agree; he'll find a way

I don’t worry at all about his offensive game, really, and I think he’ll always be able to score and rebound. Probably will be one of the best PFs in the NBA in terms of skill.

I really only just worry about his mobility and quickness on defense. And since he is a PF who won’t be able to move to the SF spot, I worry about it quite a bit since I think you NEED big men who can play defense and guard the hoop, or be like Nene and have the ability to stay in front of anyone and get deflections and steals (that is more what LMA is like, though he blocks his fair share of shots (just not as much as he should)).

He is very young though, so anything can happen. That’s the best thing about rookies! Especially when they aren’t like Al Thornton and enter the NBA when they are 33.

Lotsa other young guys have bodies that naturally stay lean and trim, and he doesn’t appear to, so he’ll have to work extra hard to compensate. I’ve never read or heard anything that says that will be a problem, though, so he will.

ALSO, just the lack of size all up and down the Wolves roster made Love’s size seem like a bigger problem as well. Telfair, Foye, Jefferson, Love, Brewer (skinny wise), all undersized, so no one can help the other out. You guys surround Love with longer, more athletic defenders, and Love’s lack of size won’t be as much of a problem.

He has a unique skillset that can’t be discounted.

Morty

by Mortimer on Jun 9, 2009 4:05 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Durant couldn't bench 100lbs.

but that has not stopped him from scoring. Pre-draft numbers mean little on the court.

by NWfan on Jun 9, 2009 3:25 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Durant and Aldridge also went to the same school...

I believe that may have been an issue for their poor testing results. It was almost certainly the reason neither benched as much as they should have.

How seriously are the numbers taken by GMs? I know a few years ago it caused Joey Graham to be taken way too high, but do GMs still put stock into it?

by poster on Jun 9, 2009 3:39 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I believe

It helps confirm what they may have previously thought about a player.

I know Oden’s numbers made KP really excited, since he was as fast and quick as the tiny guards of the draft.

LMA didn’t do well at all, but the extenuating circumstances and his raw body and play during the season made his value stay high. Monta Ellis did poorly, and he dropped super far because of it (but back then no one thought he should have declared out of high school).

Not working out for teams hurts you more, I think, like what Gerald Green did.

Horford measuring out nicely (nicer than expected) helped confirm him as the #3 pick in that nice draft, I remember that as well.

It isn’t everything, but it helps. A lot, in some cases. If Hansbrough didn’t measure out similar to Griffin, I do think it would hurt his draft stock.

Mortimer

by Mortimer on Jun 9, 2009 3:45 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

And re: the same school thing

Yeah, Texas is well known for telling the players to actually NOT lift any weights or take part in any weight training program.

This has hurt Durant and LMA’s early development, since they had especially skinny bodies.

M.

by Mortimer on Jun 9, 2009 4:22 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

And don't get stuck on the height and length thing

LMA did poorly in the pre-draft camp, but it is clear those times and numbers are not accurate reflections of his athleticism.

Watching him run the court, how quick he is on the perimeter, or how he finishes alley oops and put back slams makes it clear he is a pretty good athlete.

ESPECIALLY when you take his running.

Love… is not.

Mortimer

by Mortimer on Jun 9, 2009 3:10 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Love looks slow.

Everyone can look at Love and laugh at his slow fatness, but will they still be laughing after he kicks their butts? Something about Love is an optical illusion, for sure, but Tubby gets it done.

by princelyfrank on Jun 10, 2009 12:15 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I remember Cordoba

He has rich Corinthian leather. – Elgin

VENTURA: It's drowning. It gives you the complete sensation that you are drowning. It is no good, because you -- I'll put it to you this way, you give me a waterboard, Dick Cheney and one hour, and I'll have him confess to the Sharon Tate murders.

by 22baylor on Jun 9, 2009 2:45 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Then again maybe I'm a little biased

I have despised Love since my sophomore year in high school when he shattered our backboard and then proceeded to act like a total DBag

The NBA: Where Amazingly Bad Officiating Happens.

by The Roybot on Jun 9, 2009 2:10 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

wow.

Certified blazer.fangirl

by Roybot on Jun 9, 2009 3:07 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Someone bookmark this thread

Might be fun to read one year from now.

"I'm at the thingamajig talking the yakety-yak" - Kenny Smith

by blzrfan on Jun 9, 2009 3:28 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

over there..

i bookmarked a 5 month old thread they posted
where they stated they wouldnt be able to get pryz, bayless and webster for Love and Miller. Now Love and #6 in a weak draft is too much for GREG FREAKING ODEN

by GreatOden'sRaven on Jun 9, 2009 4:55 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I would do anything for love,

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=788H0K5KrYI

…but I won’t do that…

Come on you gotta listen unto me,
lay off that whiskey and let that cocaine be. ~Johnny Cash

by HurraKane212 on Jun 9, 2009 3:32 PM PDT reply actions   2 recs

LOL

Certified blazer.fangirl

by Roybot on Jun 9, 2009 3:38 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I'm sorry

were our basketball team plays, we don’t trade championship big men for fat dudes from Lake Oswego

by StocktonNEP on Jun 9, 2009 4:04 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

I wouldn't make that trade in a million years either...

That being said… I wouldn’t go as far as calling Love fat. He actually looks like he dropped a lot of his baby fat since he was drafted.

"And once again we can say, it's a GREAT day to be a Blazer."- Brian Wheeler

by lrh86 on Jun 9, 2009 4:09 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

yeah, if 12% body fat is fat

what does that make most of BE?

Come on you gotta listen unto me,
lay off that whiskey and let that cocaine be. ~Johnny Cash

by HurraKane212 on Jun 9, 2009 4:11 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Remember this little gem?

Foye vs Roy

This article in no way attempts to minimize the worth of Roy’s terrific and deserving Rookie-of-the-Year season. We used numbers to attempt and show that Foye stacks up favorably with the best of the 2006-07 rookies, and to suggest that you keep an eye on his production this coming season as the Wolves’ probable starting point guard.

In closing, we showed that when Foye got big minutes (if rarely), you saw his production rise not just accordingly, but exponentially. On the other hand, Roy stayed pretty consistently around his very solid 16, 4 and 4 averages in his 35 minutes per. Give Foye those 35+ and you got 21, 6 and 4, if just for five games. This argument won’t be of paramount importance for another few years, but it’s a good start.

Don’t you just love those stats?

"I'm at the thingamajig talking the yakety-yak" - Kenny Smith

by blzrfan on Jun 9, 2009 4:15 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

I hate consistency.

On the other hand, Roy stayed pretty consistently around his very solid 16, 4 and 4 averages in his 35 minutes per.

Certified blazer.fangirl

by Roybot on Jun 9, 2009 4:28 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Hindsight is 20-20 ;-)

This just goes to show how good KP is on player evaluation.

"And once again we can say, it's a GREAT day to be a Blazer."- Brian Wheeler

by lrh86 on Jun 9, 2009 4:32 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Uh, this sounds a lot like what we're doing constantly for Oden

That scares me

I'm a really really ridiculously good looking orange mocha frappaccino drinking manhammer sandwich

by hobobob on Jun 10, 2009 11:10 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Sure, but it's the excuse making and rationalizing that makes me nervous

I’d prefer not needing to defend Oden with thoughts and explanations.

I'm a really really ridiculously good looking orange mocha frappaccino drinking manhammer sandwich

by hobobob on Jun 10, 2009 1:38 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I get what you're sayin'

And I feel the same because we see it all the time with other fans, but there ARE real extenuating circumstances with Oden, and when he was on the floor he was good. He was never taken out for being bad, after all, just foul troubles.

The stuff he did well, was at an especially elite level. He WAS out of shape and coming off a bad injury, not having his minutes artificially limited by a coach because he wasn’t good some games. We do the same defending of him other fans do of their guy, but it’s different.

I know you’re an Oden guy too so it ain’t like I need to convince ya what to think… to me, the harsh judgements have ignored how good he has been when he played, and don’t take into account the extenuating circumstances. And, how young and especially RAW he was and yet was still very effective at changing a game DRAMATICALLY.

Morty

by Mortimer on Jun 10, 2009 3:06 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

"He was never taken out for being bad, after all, just foul troubles."

You are being disengenuous

Signed Jksnake99

"You're welcome friend
I love you."
- Tom "Dragline" inHawaii

by 92wastheyear on Jun 10, 2009 3:17 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Mortimer, this is ridiculous

Oden was absolutely terrible in a number of games. Foremost in my mind is the home Sacramento game where he almost single-handedly lost it for us. There are a bunch of other games where Joel finished the game because he was just better than Oden, not because of any foul trouble. The team was better when Joel started and ended games.

Oden was more often taken out for fouls than for being bad, but to say that it never happened is simply ridiculous.

by jksnake99 on Jun 10, 2009 3:38 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Ok

ALMOST never happened. It was a rare occurrence when he was taken out for his play, not his fouls.

He had rookie moments, but was hardly ever “terrible”.

I apologize for using the word “never”. It truly is an exagerration of the situation, when his play was ALMOST ALWAYS limited by foul trouble, not his actual play.

You caught me and I have learned my lesson.

Mortimer

by Mortimer on Jun 10, 2009 3:41 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

well, even if we give Oden a pass on the fouls (even though mostly they were caused by Oden's own mental mistakes)

There were still a number of occasions where Joel finished the game because he was outplaying Oden by leaps and bounds. In some cases, that said more about Joel being good than Oden being bad, and in general Oden was pretty good when on the court, but I would say Oden’s play was usually limited by foul trouble, not almost always.

by jksnake99 on Jun 10, 2009 3:47 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I will give you this victory

He was USUALLY good and USUALLY limited by foul trouble, with the combo of bad reffing, mental lapses, and bad perimeter defense being what did him in. I think conditioning will make up for the biggest part of that, and will also help immensely with the other problems.

Even with this victory, the score is:
1— Jake the Snake from 1999
379— Mortimer

It is part of my generous and noble nature that I shall relenquish the victory of this battle.

But the war is not over.

Mortimer

by Mortimer on Jun 10, 2009 3:50 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

And Oden as it regard to Foye...

…The decision to play Foye more nights he was really “on”, so his nights where he played 30+ minutes and had good stats on those nights, are different from the nights Oden played 30+ because we almost always wanted to play him 30+ as an organization. It wasn’t all development— when he played, he made a difference.

So, the defense of our player is similar to what most fanbases do for their guy who underperforms compared to a peer, but the extenuating and unique circumstances lesson the worry that we are just doing the same ol’ same ol’.

And I think the advanced stats support that belief.

Mortiferus Q. Public

by Mortimer on Jun 10, 2009 3:58 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I almost fainted when

PippenAintEasy came to my defense over there.. blast from the past

by GreatOden'sRaven on Jun 9, 2009 5:03 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Yeah lol

That is a good thread for him to run wild in.

by Sabonis4Ever on Jun 9, 2009 5:04 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

LOL
Originally I thought Jose C was an intern or some sort of spinster for the wolves…
but I think he is actually just delusional and does in fact believe the stuff he writes – roundhouse

I thought he was a Celtics fan, but I must be confusing him with someone since he only has comments on the Wolves site in his profile

by Norsktroll on Jun 9, 2009 5:21 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

well in fairness

Jose cherrypicks stats and then determines WHAT stats are more important that others.. such as minutes dont matter, etc.

this was by FAR my favorite “ultra homer denial comment”….

 Homerism???

1. I’ve stated on several occasions my dislike for numerous Wolves Players such as: Collins, Ollie, and Carney.

by GreatOden'sRaven on Jun 9, 2009 5:36 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

And Cardinal

aka “The Indefensibles”

by Norsktroll on Jun 9, 2009 6:13 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I hope you enjoyed that little golden nugget of information...

because it got me banned from CanisHoopus for a week! Lol what a joke!

by roundhouse on Jun 9, 2009 6:35 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

That would be a fun team to watch, but not a whole lot of defense

Mayo and Deron Williams are pretty much what Roy would be if he played even more point and pick and rolls. Mayo is a dominant ball handler, so not sure how well he would work with Roy.

by Norsktroll on Jun 9, 2009 6:50 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Feel free to make a comment about the Wolves in our junk drawer for a week as asylum ;-)

Just don’t call people out for not watching the games or having no idea (which in the case of the Wolves might even be true for many)

by Norsktroll on Jun 9, 2009 6:49 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

It's not a case of not watching games...

but having no idea is another story!

The Wolves fanbase has dwindled to such a small amount of diehard fans that the only people left are the ones who will continue to support without question and make excuses for this sad excuse of a professional sports organization.

by roundhouse on Jun 9, 2009 6:52 PM PDT up reply actions   1 recs

how did you get banned for making sense?

haha.. at least your arguments were grounded in reality

by GreatOden'sRaven on Jun 10, 2009 6:24 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Now, I have to go over and read it.

I'm a really really ridiculously good looking orange mocha frappaccino drinking manhammer sandwich

by hobobob on Jun 10, 2009 11:10 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Man, what happened to this fanpost?

Last I posted, there was a bit of tension brewing that I thought had been diffused. I go to the dentist and when I return there’s been major surgery done here. Or am I just imagining it all?

"Just kidding"

by CatMan2 on Jun 9, 2009 5:18 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

come on man.

that is blasphemy. are you from LO or something?

ARRRRRRRRRRRRGGGGGH!!!!!!!!- Sabonis getting fouled.

by sabonis on Jun 9, 2009 5:35 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

hes a wolves fan..

it was an interesting debate over there… good read and its an interesting topic

by GreatOden'sRaven on Jun 9, 2009 5:37 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Oh oh, we just managed that someone in the Canis Hoopus thread got a one week timeout

This shouldn’t get ugly since we all know this won’t happen and the teams are not interested to compare the relative value of Oden, Love and LMA.

by Norsktroll on Jun 9, 2009 6:19 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

I went to 82games and copied Love's and Aldridge's shooting stats breakdown. If that and the flawless shot chart linked on Canis Hoopus doesn't help to convince the people citing semi-stats that Love is not better already than LMA, nothing will
Can’t get to Love’s hotspot chart right now, but below are his numbers from 82games, he certainly isn’t a more efficient shooter, not even close around the basket (eFG%). Few PFs are. Note that Love also gets blocked more. And Aldridge is doing it on a team where he isn’t the #1 scoring option and asked to play a little further away since a big center is standing around the rim.

Love left, Aldridge right

by Norsktroll on Jun 9, 2009 7:31 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

to be fair

the % blocked stat is always a little biased towards guys that draw more fouls. You could look at Bayless and Sergio’s stats there and conclude similarly that Sergio is better finisher around the rim, also. I in no way think Love is already better than LaMarcus, but he does draw fouls at nearly twice the rate LA does.

I can see Wolves fans liking Love’s future prospects more than LA’s, given the difference in their ages/experience, even if I don’t agree.

by Royster on Jun 9, 2009 7:45 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

And to further elaborate

I’m not sure that many posters here should be throwing stones around this glass house given that I see even more ridiculous arguments about Bayless being the next coming of Tony Parker around here all the time.

by Royster on Jun 9, 2009 7:48 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I don't think I've ever seen anyone say that Bayless is the next TP

Where?

I see people defending his status as a so called Bust. Can’t say I’ve ever read, on here, that he’s the next TP.

Witty Unpredictable Talent and Natural Game

by iDea on Jun 11, 2009 8:35 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Must not have been paying attention
This guy needs one thing. Time. That’s it. He has Tony Parker potential and is taller and stronger. He is just a hair less quick. Seeing as we are modeling our team after the Spurs Dynasty a scoring PG with some ability to distribute alongside a play making 2 guard is exactly what we want.

Trading Bayless would mean KP has lost his Mind!

am I crazy for seeing Bayless doing for the Blazers (in a few years) roughly what Parker has done for the Spurs?

a Bayless comparison: Tony Parker

In a few years, Bayless will be a Tony Parker/Monta Ellis mix

Norsk comment

Yes, Parker got more play his rookie year because those Spurs teams had no other options, but with his quick first step and a knack for getting to the basket, I see Jerryd following Parker’s career arc

Shades of Tony Parker

you look at what tony parker was like early in his career, and you’ll see bayless

bayless is the next tony parker

And that’s just a selection of some of the more blatant ones. Thank God for SBN’s search feature.

by Royster on Jun 11, 2009 12:11 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Is there anything wrong with thinking JB could become a similar player to TP.

They play the same position and are both score first PG’s. Bayless has a lot of untapped potential and could become a star pg in the NBA.

You are the crazy one if you don’t think bayless has potential.

You could be right that he won’t ever amount to anything but give the kid a couple years before you judge him to harshly.

"And once again we can say, it's a GREAT day to be a Blazer."- Brian Wheeler

by lrh86 on Jun 11, 2009 1:06 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I'm saying it's no less crazy

When did I ever say he doesn’t have potential, or that he’s a bust? Just that comparing him to Tony Parker now isn’t any better than Wolves fans saying Love could be as good or better than Aldridge.

It’s ridiculous to think that Bayless will be Tony Parker but that Love has no chance of ever being better than LaMarcus. Thinking either one (or both) is fine, but mocking Love-Aldridge as completely homer while vigorously defending Parker-Bayless is pretty unfair in my book.

by Royster on Jun 11, 2009 1:32 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Life isn't fair.

"And once again we can say, it's a GREAT day to be a Blazer."- Brian Wheeler

by lrh86 on Jun 11, 2009 2:55 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

In all seriousness though...

You do have a point.

"And once again we can say, it's a GREAT day to be a Blazer."- Brian Wheeler

by lrh86 on Jun 11, 2009 2:55 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

The problem with Wolves fans thinking that

is that they don’t realize that Kevin Love even though he is younger and less experienced is closer to his ceiling than LMA is to his.

by as11osu on Jun 10, 2009 1:37 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Regardless, that's still an opinion

If Love can rediscover his mid-range shooting form and get into better shape while keeping/increasing his strength, he could turn out better. He’s certainly got much more potential as a passer than LaMarcus, and is much better at boxing out.

Those are some big ifs, but if he improves his rookie stats at a faster rate than LaMarcus has, yeah, he could turn out better. It’s not like LA has been making massive leaps year to year. Incremental ones, and he’s showing progress, but not exactly “Bosh in 06”-type gains here. I don’t think that Love will be better, but it’s not so far out of the realm of possibility to deserve merciless mocking, like the idea that Foye could still turn out to be better than Roy or something along those lines.

by Royster on Jun 10, 2009 9:43 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Exacly where he deserves to be

He rivals K0be as my most hated NBA player

The NBA: Where Amazingly Bad Officiating Happens.

by The Roybot on Jun 9, 2009 9:03 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I believe ya yo.

I think you said it wayyyy back when before the kid was even drafted… you were upset about it and I think used it as a reason not to draft him.

The Faith don't panic, the faith freaks out, burns out farms, and torchs small villages in the name of The Faith.

by faith on Jun 9, 2009 9:15 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yeah I'd pretty much stop watching if Kevin Love ended up on the Blazers

Unless he was stashed on the bench and didn’t get a minute on the floor

The NBA: Where Amazingly Bad Officiating Happens.

by The Roybot on Jun 9, 2009 9:40 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

awwwww it all got nuked.... :(

?? I thought most of it was pretty clean… no? ah, not questioning just sayin, I was chillin at work enjoyin the debate (despite being biased/on drugs/and still sain some how) but I couldn’t believe what I was reading…

My first reaction was …. someones on drugs. Love for oden? I’m not sure who they could pair with love that would make us bite let alone just a #6 pick…

I don’t know squat about Love other than he cried during a game, is apparently from oregon, even though he can’t play for an “oregon” team, and that he got traded for mayo….

my only arguement as to who is better … boils down to….
how many games did the timberwolves win last season? N if it wasn’t 5 more than last season without love, then ?? pfttt… yeah love rocks, what seed were they in the playoffs? oh yeah love rocks how many centers do they really have? pft yeah their general manager know’s what he’s doin ( I know they just underwent some change but still, It’s minisodee pop.)

kk… anyway yeah love for greg … thats funny.

The Faith don't panic, the faith freaks out, burns out farms, and torchs small villages in the name of The Faith.

by faith on Jun 9, 2009 9:05 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Anyone

that would think this was a good deal for Portland obviously has no basketball IQ

by Jason1980 on Jun 9, 2009 9:13 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

fluffy large angry guest worry others recieve the hottie yoga protistant order stamp taker.

:o

The Faith don't panic, the faith freaks out, burns out farms, and torchs small villages in the name of The Faith.

by faith on Jun 9, 2009 9:18 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

note to mod...

find out who voted yes and ban them.

thank you :)

The Faith don't panic, the faith freaks out, burns out farms, and torchs small villages in the name of The Faith.

by faith on Jun 9, 2009 9:37 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

I would trade Pryz for love and the sixth

Then the sixth outlaw and sergio to Memphis for the 2nd

"Knowledge will get you from A to B. Creativity will get you anywhere." Einstein

by Garden of ODEN on Jun 9, 2009 10:34 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

We would have a back up PF and Rubio

We would retain some cap space and trade exception we could pull a back up center in. Gortat maybe?

"Knowledge will get you from A to B. Creativity will get you anywhere." Einstein

by Garden of ODEN on Jun 9, 2009 10:35 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Wait it was ODen they wanted to trade

Haha no wouldn’t do that trade

"Knowledge will get you from A to B. Creativity will get you anywhere." Einstein

by Garden of ODEN on Jun 9, 2009 10:36 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Lol, like they would be doing us a favor. I guess us giving them a franchise changing center would be

a hassle for them but they’d be willing to bite that bullet. Wolves fans are starting to lose their minds.

by BRoyInThe4th on Jun 10, 2009 12:03 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Definitely no trade, but...

at what point is Oden someone you consider trading?

I actually think the Love + #6 pick is a relatively even trade in value, but one that makes no sense for Portland (they don’t need another 4 and it’s too hard to give up on the Oden dream).

But at some point Oden will have to be evaluated as the player he is in the NBA, not the player we all wish he would be. If Portland does it sooner they get more in return, but another season or two like the last one (or possibly worse since he could be out with injuries) and his value goes wayyyyy down.

So when should they cut the cord? Or is it worth it to ride this out to the very end?

by Django Z on Jun 10, 2009 8:15 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

the 2010-2011 season would be the earliest possible time I would consider trading Oden

if he stays relatively injury free. If more injuries pop up then all trade talk is moot.

by ppilot on Jun 10, 2009 12:01 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I don't think you make that call after one season

Give him at least his rookie contract.

Witty Unpredictable Talent and Natural Game

by iDea on Jun 11, 2009 8:38 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Half of kevin love's rebounds

are him catching his own shot after he gets blocked.

dinasour type of guys choir boys

by mittsabishy on Jun 10, 2009 11:30 AM PDT reply actions   1 recs

Here's another, related, question.

Would you guys trade Oden for Kevin Durant?

by princelyfrank on Jun 10, 2009 11:47 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

No

and that subject is a pretty tired one around here as you might well imagine. – Elgin

VENTURA: It's drowning. It gives you the complete sensation that you are drowning. It is no good, because you -- I'll put it to you this way, you give me a waterboard, Dick Cheney and one hour, and I'll have him confess to the Sharon Tate murders.

by 22baylor on Jun 10, 2009 11:57 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I figured that was probably the case -

but, this being my first time at BE, I figured asking the question was more time-efficient than digging through the archives.

My brain tells me that any Oden trade is pretty much off the table for you guys until Oden either demonstrates that he a great pro C who can stay healthy and play real minutes, or else he definitively demonstrates that he is not. While Oden is still basically a blank slate, it’s virtually impossible for possible trade partners to gauge his true value and they will, thus, not offer anything the Blazers could reasonably accept for a former number one overall pick.

Pretty ballsy, though, to turn up your noses at one of the best young players in the league. I guess that’s the luxury of having a roster pretty much overflowing with good young talent (even if none of the talent, IMO, is as good as Durant, outside of B-Roy, who is comparable – more polished, slightly less room for growth).

by princelyfrank on Jun 10, 2009 12:08 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

That's a pretty good assessment

and while Durant’s a peculiar talent, he’s not the type of player that historically led teams to where we desperately want to go. He doesn’t play D well.

I don’t know how many Blazer games you caught last season, but watch carefully when Oden enters the game next season. He warps the game around him. He must be accounted for even at his relatively modest level right now. That’s what we’re basing our love in. He’s a serious game changer right now. Durant just doesn’t do that the same way. Yes, he can change the game when he’s hot, but he’s not a threat to rebound, block shots, and crush you with his size. I know this sounds strange, but look for it next time you catch one of his games. It’s a real effect.

Whether that translates to wins or losses at this point, IDK, but we did win 13 more games than last year with our starting SF out for the season. How much of that was Rudy, Batum, Joel’s big season, idk either. But, i have to imagine some of that was Oden.

Contrast that to the wins OKC got without Durant, and that’s probably the reason we wouldn’t trade.

I'm a really really ridiculously good looking orange mocha frappaccino drinking manhammer sandwich

by hobobob on Jun 10, 2009 1:46 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

the 13 extra wins was Blake's fault

remember he had a career season. The lesson from the playoffs.

by NWfan on Jun 10, 2009 5:35 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

demonstrates.... he hasn't already?

ROOKIE CENTER off of MICRO FRACTURE.

if those that went under that knife are any indication…. and considering his youth…

we’ve only seen the tip of the iceburg that is greg oden.

The Faith don't panic, the faith freaks out, burns out farms, and torchs small villages in the name of The Faith.

by faith on Jun 10, 2009 4:47 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

No....just based on how the team is put together

Durant is a volume scorer while being a #1 option for his team. On the blazers he would be at best the second option while sometimes being third dending on the lineup. Also that trade would deplete our frontcourt and would not allow Joel to play carefree (a big reason for his stat increases across the board.

by ppilot on Jun 10, 2009 11:58 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

we didn't draft high enough for Lopez

and I’d still want Oden and Bayless regardless. What Oden brings, or rather could bring, is much more valuable than anything either Durant or Lopez could.

by as11osu on Jun 10, 2009 12:59 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

its all about how confident you are that Oden *will* bring what he *could* bring

I don’t think it would have been particularly difficult to trade into Charlotte’s #9 spot and draft Lopez.

by jksnake99 on Jun 10, 2009 1:01 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

probably true

I just can’t see Blake – Roy – Durant – Aldridge – Lopez ever being anything more than pathetic on the defensive end. Pathetic is my kind term for it.

by as11osu on Jun 10, 2009 1:10 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

My eyes told me that Lopez was a significantly better defender than Oden last year

Lopez was 4th in the league in blocks (9th in block %). One other thing is that if you had Durant and Lopez (both much better scoring options than Batum/Oden), you could get away with signing an all defense/no offense PG, or even look to move Aldridge for a top PG and/or a defense first 4.

All of this is just fun speculation, of course.

by jksnake99 on Jun 10, 2009 1:17 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Oden was 10th in block percentage

He was also MUCH better on the glass at both ends (Oden’s team rebounding 110 out of 200 ( #1 in NBA) while collecting 36.5 out of 100 himself, Lopez’s team rebounding was 100 out of 200 while collecting 28.3 out of 100 himself). Oden also led the NBA in offensive rebounding collecting 15.7% of those available. He also gave up less PER in production and had a higher positive PER differential. You know all the crap he went through this year. It really was quite an impressive year.

by as11osu on Jun 10, 2009 2:35 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I generally agree.

The question is whether he can do it over a 2500 minute season.

by jksnake99 on Jun 10, 2009 3:02 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

If he can bring his best stuff to the playoffs

I’m just fine with him missing time here and there. In the long run it’s probably better for him to take occasional breathers from the game, or get a couple games where he doesn’t go full tilt.

As we saw this year, the rest of our guys are good enough to get us to the playoffs. Once we get there, that’s going to be Oden time.

by as11osu on Jun 10, 2009 3:20 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I'm not just talking about injuries

I’m talking about the mental mistakes he makes on defense that lead to foul trouble. It would also be nice if he did better than his 1:29 ast/to ratio that he had down the stretch of last season. I wouldn’t swap Oden for Lopez straight up, but I certainly would swap Oden and Bayless for Lopez and Durant in a second.

by jksnake99 on Jun 10, 2009 3:34 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

not with a busted kneecap

darn you Maggette (in my best Stephen Colbert voice).

by NWfan on Jun 10, 2009 5:38 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

OMG.....

I honestly thought this died already.
What is it about the impact that Greg Has on the games that he plays in that some just don’t see? Defense strengthens, Offensive put backs and the dunks…oh the dunks…. guards shy away from a set oden, Forwards throw the ball back out much quicker with oden on them, and someone said something to the effect that greg cant pass? WHAT?…. LOL…

this is just silly to even consider.

Portlands front office would laugh, hang up, call back and ask, (still laughing mind you), " No no wait, You were serious?" and hang back up.

done done and done…. Drugs is the only explenation I see for the thought that Kevin Love AND a #6 pick is even REMOTELY CLOSE to the impact player that Oden is.

Do powerforwards comment on how strong love is? Did 10000s of people ooddle over Loves potential?

How many more games did mini win over last season? yeah loves an impact play alright…that’s a hoot. in my humble horrible unprofessional opinion.

The Faith don't panic, the faith freaks out, burns out farms, and torchs small villages in the name of The Faith.

by faith on Jun 10, 2009 4:44 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

past potential?

I don’t think you’ve been following the discussion very closely.

Potential that people “ooddled” over in the past is not the issue. Both Love and Oden have had a chance to play in the league for a year now, we know alot more than we did 2 years ago.

Love is a very good, but unspectacular player. He definitely plays better than he looks. But he’s not likely to ever be better than a solid starter, non-all-star. Valuable to have on a team, but not special.

Oden may turn out to be a special player, but he has serious health concerns and played at a much lower level than expected as a rookie. Oden will no doubt improve so long as he can play, but he looked slow and lethargic against the pros – far from a dominating center. It looks like he’ll be a good starting center, maybe even an all-star for a few seasons, but much less than the HOF center he was projected to be.

And if I had to bet it’d be that he plays less than 500 games in the NBA. I just don’t think his body will hold up. It’s a shame. He seems like a great guy and we need more great centers in the league.

These are the reasons this playful trade proposal is continuing to be discussed. It isn’t a serious option, just interesting.

And I’m willing to bet that in 4 years Love + the BPA at the #6 pick will be worth more than Oden.

by Django Z on Jun 10, 2009 5:07 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I along with many will take that bet and happily pay up when we win our string of championships.

Value to each sure, but Odens potential is still being oddled over, not to mention What he’s already done, granted it wasn’t a great rookie season….shoot for him in my opinion it was a disaster… but if what we got was a disaster, omfreakingod watch out….Cuz really given what we were asking of him….It was not bad at all.

He’s not where alot of us wanted him to be right now, I’ll be the first to admit that. I expected a dominating over the top dunks on howards head 5 times in the same game, blocks k*be 6 times in the next game, and hit 20-20 free throws in the 3rd game…. I expected wayyyyy to much from a 20 year old kid playing a mans game….. that’s what I expected, ….. the “we’s” though,………the we’s were right on the money with what they expected….. a rookie center who with his amazing physical talents was going to need some work…. mind you he could thrive off of physical talents alone.

Keep in mind though … we knew that when we drafted him…we didn’t draft oden for oden then….WE drafted oden for this next season.
He is so much more valuable to this team than any combonation of players the Timberwolves can come up with…for this team. if that makes any sense.

N if your going to tell me that Kevin Love and a #6 pick gets one Greg Oden from any General Manager in the NBA…(remeber isiah is gone)…. well I’m not sure I wanna talk to you cuz I think your crazy.

The Faith don't panic, the faith freaks out, burns out farms, and torchs small villages in the name of The Faith.

by faith on Jun 10, 2009 5:35 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

and as far as love goes....

in my opinion the best you’ve seen is ALL your going to get.

The Faith don't panic, the faith freaks out, burns out farms, and torchs small villages in the name of The Faith.

by faith on Jun 10, 2009 5:37 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Deal

It’ll take a year or two, but let’s check in then and settle this bet. :-)

Just remember I said Love + the BPA at #6 – that means the best player in that range of 6-10, assuming you have a good scouting department/GM etc. It may not be the player picked #6 this year, but one of those picked 6-10 will end up very good and I think Love will be a solid starter. And that will be worth more than Oden playing 50 games a year or out of the league.

by Django Z on Jun 11, 2009 10:05 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

That shouldn't be how it works...

when the #6 pick is chosen, you should have to pick a player. That’’s how this would work.

by as11osu on Jun 11, 2009 12:29 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Fine

I’ll come back and pick one of the available players at that point and post it here.

My point was only that the #6 pick + Love has more worth than Oden and if you have a good FO and scouting department you can make the most of a pick like that. But I’ll do my best amateur impression of a FO.

by Django Z on Jun 11, 2009 4:02 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

No deal on that Trade.

"Knowledge will get you from A to B. Creativity will get you anywhere." Einstein

by Garden of ODEN on Jun 11, 2009 5:45 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

A site by Blazer fans, for Blazer fans
Start posting about the Trail Blazers »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

Connect_with_facebook

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
Sched Ahead Daily Update, Games of 3/20
Small
SB Nation Survey + Chance to donate $500 to a charity of this community's choice
Picture_533_small
Gavin Dawson appreciation thread.
Small
Sched Ahead Daily Update, Games of 3/18
Joel_przybilla_small
To:Juwan Howard, with love.

Recent FanPosts

Bigred_small
March 22st Big Red Junk
Small
What does tom penn have on Larry miller?
Cute_small
Oregonian's Top Ten?
Cabo_small
Is Nic Batum a geometry major?
Nicbatum_sm_small
Spring Into Junk - March 21st 2010
Small
Comparing the Thunder to the Blazers
Troll_stone_cropped_small
Joelconomic Junk Sat March 20 Anno Domini 2010
Small
Umm, has anoyone noticed the washington win gaurantees us a winning season for the third year in a row?
Nalin_tonia_small
Off-Top: I'm loving how those two Pac-10 teams punked those two Big East teams

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

FanShots

Quick hits of video, photos, quotes, chats, links and lists that you find around the web.

Recommended FanShots

In Your Face Bill Simmons!
Self explanatory
A fantastic piece of NBA journalism, even if it is about the L*kers.
Oden rehab update
Paul Allen and his Vulcan Advisor

Add your own caption...

Recent FanShots

Derrick Rose theme song
Outlaw dunk vs Kings.
Solid Thunder playoff analysis
Korie Lucious amazing buzzer-beating three
Northern Iowa Defeats Overall Top Seed Kansas
Check Out the Spurs Schedule
the Next sam bowie
Smith: Rudy Fernandez Will Not Travel to Phoenix
Wall or Turner? Ask LeBron, Kobe-- More praise for Roy

+ New FanShot All FanShots >

SBNation.com Recent Stories

San Antonio Spurs guard Malik Hairston is fouled on a dunk attempt over the Golden State Warriors' Anthony Tolliver during the second half of an NBA basketball game at the AT&T Center in San Antonio, Friday, March 19, 2010. The Spurs beat the Warriors, 147-116. (AP Photo/Bahram Mark Sobhani)

Spurs Torch Warriors, 147-116, In Highest Scoring Game Since 1991

ATLANTA - MARCH 19: Joe Johnson #2 of the Atlanta Hawks is congratulated by teammates after hitting the winning shot against the Charlotte Bobcats on March 19, 2010 at Philips Arena in Atlanta, Georgia.  (Photo by Scott Cunningham/NBAE via Getty Images)

Hawks' Johnson Does His Best Jordan Impersonation, Hits Winning Shot In OT

New Orleans Hornets forward James Posey, left, reaches in for the ball as Denver Nuggets forward Carmelo Anthony looks for a shot in the fourth quarter of the Nuggets' 93-80 victory in an NBA basketball game in Denver on Thursday, March 18, 2010. (AP Photo/David Zalubowski) link

Nuggets Rout Hornets 93-80

More from SBNation.com >


Editors

Kitten_small Dave

Ben_small Ben.

Moderators

Pict1126_small -ken

Polar_bear_small jorga

Terryporter_small prezofdeath

Small usmcr3049

Lamb_small T Darkstar

Wallpaper_small geoffm