Kidd talking to Blazers after Knicks?

Looks like Kidd is on the Blazers' Radar.

over 2 years ago WarEaglePDX 12 comments 0 recs |

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Like I was thinking...

"Grayg"
-Nate

by OSUBlazerfan on Jun 30, 2009 10:10 PM PDT reply actions

I'd be ok with Kidd

It would be an upgrade which could really help Oden and Aldridge, Bayless could learn behind him. And it’s a straight FA deal, we don’t have to trade half the team.

I’d be less happy with it if Blake was his backup. That seems to be a short term gain without building the future.The “build the future” part is where Bayless gets the backup minutes.

Blake and Travis coould be traded for a banger at the four.

Good all the way around.

by raoulduke on Jun 30, 2009 10:11 PM PDT reply actions

YESSS!!

I was worried I was going to lose faith in KP… but no…

by JordanLeDoux on Jun 30, 2009 10:15 PM PDT reply actions

Calm down, sparky.

It’s a one liner that doesn’t reference any specific information. It says “It is believed”.

All aboard the Kirkwagon!

by Arby on Jun 30, 2009 10:20 PM PDT up reply actions

Doesn't matter... it didn't seem like it was even on the Blazers radar, which would be a major error.

by JordanLeDoux on Jun 30, 2009 10:25 PM PDT up reply actions

I don’t like Kidd, but if it means no Hedo then I want him.

by Cablinasian on Jun 30, 2009 10:30 PM PDT reply actions 1 recs

I like Kidd, and if it means no Hedo, I like him doubly so

How did you guys win that?
"We scored enough points. We scored 107, they scored 105.
-Nate McMillan Postgame, 3/4/2009

by douglast on Jun 30, 2009 10:43 PM PDT reply actions

Kidd's options

Hows things have changed. Not to long ago Kidd didn’t want to come to Blazers. Isn’t progress a great thing.

Have said before I don’t think Kidd will come to the Blazers, ultimately I can see him signing MLE somewhere like Cleveland, Orlando, Celtics or going back to Dallas.

Only reason he signs with NY is he has 2010 in mind.

by Bairdy on Jul 1, 2009 2:25 AM PDT reply actions