Not who we need, but what we need.
Obviously there is a lot of chatter right now about which players we should target via trade, free agency, and the draft. I say we should focus more on what we need and let those questions answer themselves. Or wait for KP to, whatever comes first.
DRAFT: Over the last few years our fan base has, rightfully, fallen in love with draft-day excitement. Those days are over, folks. Brandon Roy has said it: "I want to win a championship". I'm not saying that we shouldn't utilize one or two of our draft picks, but we definitely should not package them with any significant amount of assets to obtain a higher draft pick for the purpose of contributing next season. I would be all for packaging said picks with existing assets to get a player that fits the Blazer's timetable, preferably someone who has playoff experience or at least three years of NBA experience. This is a MUST if we are looking for someone who will need to fill a role that requires immediate contribution. Even a Ricky Rubio would require giving up too much and would simultaneously set us back three years if we NEEDED him to be our starter (which we probably would after trading away all of our point guards to get him).
Diagnosis: Trade secound round picks and AN asset (current player or player rights) for solid role players to assist Brandon's quest starting next year. I think a player that could fill a James Posey / Kurt Thomas / Eddie House - type role at the back-up power forward would help us the most here.
STARTING POINT GUARD: First let me say that I am completely against trading Steve Blake. No, he isn't our starter, but he is still extremely important to our team. While lacking the lateral quickness, defensive ability, and the ability to put pressure on the opposing defense he still brings the smarts, toughness, and big game experience that is so valuable to a team competing for a championship. Especially at the point guard position, as a backup. No matter what we do here, we still need Steve Blake. Now, what we need in a starting point guard are exactly the weaknesses in Steve's game stated above. Especially the part about being able to put pressure on the opposing team's point guard. This is very important because it will wear out the opposing point guard quickly while limiting their ability to focus on running their own offense. This is imperative to throwing the competition off their game plan in the playoffs. As we've seen, once this is accomplished we've pretty much won the series.
Diagnosis: Use a combination of our first round pick, cap space, and multiple assets to aqcuire someone who posseses the attributes mentioned above, and a high b-ball IQ.
SMALL FORWARD: Again refering to Brandon's declaration that our time is now, when we try to decide who our starting small forward should be, already on our roster or not, we should look at what we will need from this position to win a championship. Period. The way I would go about it would be by likely playoff matchups that would be the most challenging. The first player to come to mind is LeBron James. All paths to a championship is going to run through this guy for a while. I realize we won't be able to stop him no matter what we do. Our goal should be to make it as hard as possible for him to "do what he do". And what he does is bully smaller, finess-oriented small forwards out of his way to the hoop with his superior strength and athleticism. Sorry for all the Tayshaun fans out there, but he's already been ruled out. LeBron knocks feather-weights like him over.
Diagnosis: We need a small forward who is physically strong, well-built and can (at least) put up some resistance and make guys like LeBron and Carmelo work. One player I can see as a possible solution here is our own Martell Webster. We know that his athletic ability is very underated. We also know that he looks like a pretty strong guy. What we would need is for him to pack on another 10 pounds of muscle without comprimising his athleticism and shooting touch. Also, I'm not worried about focusing on one opponent too much here. if we are developing a small forward to compete with LeBron, well, 'nuff said.
BACKUP POWER FORWARD: I won't go into too much detail as I have already addressed this position under the draft portion of this post. What I will say is that whoever this person is, they need to have big game experience, size, defensive ability, toughness, and six fouls. With LaMarcus, Joel, and Oden already on our roster this guy won't play that much. Hopefully we can get a team-oriented guy who will go out in the last three minutes of the third quarter, rebound the heck out of the ball, and kick guys like Scola's ass (pardon my French).
Conclusion: Should be a pretty active, exciting off-season even without a lottery pick. I don't think too many fans of the other contenders can say the same thing. KP, Penn and co. have done a great job of setting us up to improve. I expect they will make this a recurring theme. GO BLAZERS!
0 recs |
16 comments
Comments
great points
But in order to get what we need, who do we need?
by tominrehab on May 6, 2009 10:35 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
I don't think there is a right answer to those questions with the information I've got.
Besides the obvious: David Lee, CP3, and LeBron himself. :)
I like the idea of developing Webster into our “strong man three” since he seems to have the build to support it and already posseses other talents and skills that are hard to teach (mainly jump-shooting). And if he were the answer we could focus more of our resources on acquiring an even better point guard. If not him I’m looking at Gerald Wallace (maybe not strong enough), Stephen Jackson or Caron Butler. Maybe Antawn Jamison at the three?
While David Lee may be attainable for our backup four I think he would probably be too expensive for the role we need him to fill ($10 mil annually). Looking at what’s out there I like Brandon Bass (undersized) Leon Powe (also undersized) and Carl Landry (notice a theme here?). Maybe Etan Thomas? It’s possible we could find this guy in the draft but I wouldn’t be comfortable with him on the floor in the playoffs next year. A young Charles Oakely or Brian Grant would be ideal. I think we missed out on acquiring Nene when he seemed to be up for grabs a few years ago, but we’d have the same issues with him that we’d have with Lee.
My answers seem to just be leading to more questions…
this has been a message from: "The People's Alliance to give Greg Oden at Least a Couple of Seasons"
by bforsythe on May 6, 2009 11:11 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Maybe look at some US players that are currently overseas for the tough-guy backup four. I only say this because they would need to be cool with limited playing time. I would focus on the NBA Las Vegas summer league too. I remember watching Powe play in this his first year. I though he was just another flash-in-the-pan type, but here he is still kicking it – contributing on a good team in a limited role that I’m sure he’s thrilled to have.
this has been a message from: "The People's Alliance to give Greg Oden at Least a Couple of Seasons"
by bforsythe on May 6, 2009 11:14 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
This post is good.
It isn’t fluid, but I like it.
I know less than half of you half as well as I should like, and I like less than half of you half as well as you deserve.
by haildablazer on May 6, 2009 11:18 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
i'm worried about martell's foot
and see this injury very differently than for instance a surgically-repaired knee
ignacio
by ignacio on May 7, 2009 2:34 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Me too. Why I didn’t think to bring that up is beyond me…
this has been a message from: "The People's Alliance to give Greg Oden at Least a Couple of Seasons"
by bforsythe on May 7, 2009 12:14 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah, this is a great post and I agree with the analysis completely. Well done.
I, too, hope Martell is our answer at the three, but man, he sure has been snakebit. I actually think a lot is riding on him next year. If he can live up to some of his potential and stay on the court, he and Nic will be a tough pair to match up with—speed, quickness, toughness, shooting…
But that’s a really big if.
by Marvin100 on May 7, 2009 4:13 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Batum got stronger as the year passed
he could eventually be able to guard the Lebrons and Melos
by Falcao on May 7, 2009 6:27 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
batum will probably always be wiry strong
which is a great thing in itself, but i dont think he’ll have the muscle that artest and lebron have.
I got 6 years of playoff blue balls going on, and I'm ready to release. GO BLAZERS. ~Mortimer
by Philthyanimal on May 7, 2009 10:04 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I agree.
He will still be a great team defender off the bench but in the end he either will be or won’t be as good as Tayshaun Prince. A valuable piece, absolutely — but not enough to really hamper LeBron.
this has been a message from: "The People's Alliance to give Greg Oden at Least a Couple of Seasons"
by bforsythe on May 7, 2009 12:16 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
In general, I like the approach of looking at team strengths and weaknesses first....
….then strengths and weaknesses by position, before getting into individual players.
Where does the team need to improve? Then let’s talk about players or combinations of players that may be able to achieve that improvement.
In my opinion, the priorities look something like this:
1) Perimeter defense
2) Low-post scoring
3) Improved ability to handle screens and pick-and-roll defense
4) Having a player who is a legitimate scoring threat at every starting position so we can keep defenses more honest.
This list of priorities keeps me coming back to needing to upgrade at PG if possible at a reasonable price.
Need for a back-up 4 who can bang and score in the low post.
I think we can get improved defense and scoring at the 3 through Nic maturing and Martell coming back.
by upper left corner on May 7, 2009 10:34 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
The 2nd unit will be chock full of shooters. We need inside scoring.
Assuming Blake will be in a backup role next season, that leaves us with Martell or Batum as a backup 3 and Rudy as a backup 2. Rudy will be on the floor at the end of games but I think he’s destined to be our Manu Ginobli. Both guards are shooters, as are Martell and Batum until he develops further. With Joel playing center, there’s nobody who can score consistently in the post. Ability to hit an open 15 footer would be nice, but that’s secondary to the inside game, defense, and rebounding.
As for the 3, I think we’re chock full of talent at that position and Martell and/or Batum will have a break-out year. Seems like the least of our needs.
by Benjamanic on May 7, 2009 10:43 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Agree that a back-up 4 should be someone who can score as well as defend and rebound.
Ideally we would find an older star who wants to compete for a ring and is willing to sign for less and play fewer minutes to extend his career. Someone who could teach LMA a few low-post tricks would be perfect.
by upper left corner on May 7, 2009 12:05 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Sure, score easy cheap buckets around the hoop. Be an excellent offensive rebounder so this can happen, with good hands.
this has been a message from: "The People's Alliance to give Greg Oden at Least a Couple of Seasons"
by bforsythe on May 7, 2009 3:15 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
But their being able to score shouldn’t be necessary. We shouldn’t be running plays for them.
this has been a message from: "The People's Alliance to give Greg Oden at Least a Couple of Seasons"
by bforsythe on May 7, 2009 3:32 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs

by 
























