The Season in Review: A Final Recap and Analysis
Today we bid a final adieu to the 2008-09 campaign by looking at the season as a whole. Whereas the statistical posts focused on small details today we're going to take one last fly-over of the big picture. Hopefully we're far enough away from last week's playoff ouster to put things in perspective without too much leftover pathos getting in the way yet still close enough for the memories and significance to be fresh.
Few people questioned Portland's talent or potential going into the season. With Brandon Roy seemingly on a path to jersey retirement from the moment he laced on sneakers, LaMarcus Aldridge continuing to develop, and first overall pick Greg Oden returning, the most stacked lineup the Blazers had fielded since the days of Rasheed Wallace was all but a guarantee. The critical pre-season speculation revolved around assimilation and rotation. Questions included:
- How would Greg Oden look? How quickly could he adapt to the league?
- How would Joel Przybilla take to a reserve role, assuming that happened?
- Would this be a breakout year for Sergio Rodriguez or would Jerryd Bayless reprise his Summer League tour de force and take over Sergio's spot?
- Would either reserve point guard eventually displace Steve Blake as the starter?
- Would we finally see a consistent season from Travis Outlaw? And exactly what position would he play?
- Would Rudy Fernandez just set the league on fire or would he actually nuke it into oblivion?
- Had Martell Webster paved over the final potholes in his game?
- Was the Channing Frye we saw during the last few weeks of 2007-08 real?
- What would happen with Raef LaFrentz's Expiring Contract?
The sentiment going into the season was that the Blazers were being dealt 9-10 cards playing five-card stud poker. You didn't know exactly what hand would be made, but chances were it would be good. It was just a matter of putting the cards in the right order.
The bigger challenges looked to be the twin gaps of inexperience and unfamiliarity. Between Oden and Fernandez being new altogether and the point guards and forwards taking on increased roles the Blazers were looking at a new rotational incarnation. They also fielded one of the youngest teams in the league...as it turned out THE youngest if you only considered people actually playing. The early-season schedule involved repeated road games against the previous year's playoff teams. Would the Blazers be able to survive that early schedule with confidence intact? The concern was that Portland's talent could get buried in a wash of emotional letdown should the first two months play out as brutally as they looked to on paper.
The first sign that it wasn't going to be easy came in the pre-season when Martell Webster went down with what would turn out to be a season-ending foot injury. Now all of a sudden the Blazers didn't look as deep. They had bodies to fill in but none seemed ideally suited. Travis Outlaw looked out of position as a small forward. Nicolas Batum and Rudy Fernandez were brand new to the league.
The second and third blows came on opening night. Fresh-faced and excited for the revolution to begin the Blazers faced off against the conference champion L*kers in Los Angeles. They were quickly disabused of any notions of contention as Kobe and company took them to the woodshed. Brandon Roy's game looked rusty and forced. Everyone else looked shell-shocked. Worst of all, Greg Oden was lost to injury again after playing only 13 (scoreless) minutes of the new season. Echoes of last season's disappointment with their star-center-in-waiting reverberated throughout Blazer Nation and never truly subsided throughout the year.
The first week of the season played out as discouraging as advertised. After a skin-of-the-teeth victory against San Antonio in the home opener the Blazers dropped two more, leaving their overall record at 1-3. Then Portland faced Houston at home in a hard-fought contest ending with the game being won, then lost, then finally won again in the last second with a miracle shot from Brandon Roy. His spot-on Leonidas of Sparta impression at midcourt after the final horn, surrounded by his incredulously cheering teammates, remains one of the indelible images of the season, perhaps of the decade.
That victory would spark four more wins following, beginning a 13-3 overall run and a 19-9 dash through the remainder of November and December. When Portland entered the New Year with a 20-12 record and the toughest part of their schedule behind them it became clear that something special could happen this season.
Portland followed up its riotous early success with a 9-5 January, a 7-5 February, and an 11-5 March. For a team that hadn't seen a winning month before this year these records were gaudy in the extreme. However the Blazers still showed inconsistency in the midst of winning. In particular they found themselves struggling to win against decent teams on the road, sometimes against not-so-decent teams as well.
Along the way several of the early-season questions had been answered. Greg Oden was ready to contribute on the boards but not anywhere else consistently. He struggled with foul trouble and confidence. Joel Przybilla did not have to deal with the reserve role as he took over and retained the starting position, turning in one of the best seasons of his career. Neither reserve point guard made any lasting bid for more minutes and the position remained in flux and a point of frustration throughout the year. Steve Blake, suddenly freed to shoot stand-still threes in the offense, quietly compiled one of his best seasons. Rudy Fernandez had spectacular moments, especially beyond the three-point arc, but he was not taking the league by storm. He was, in essence, a rookie with significant bonuses rather than a ready-made contributor. Travis Outlaw's game seemed to be stuck on a plateau instead of growing. Channing Frye's had found a sinkhole. In a reversal of pre-season expectations, the Blazers were not quite as deep as advertised but they were producing wins from their mental acuity, poise, and teamwork. Perceived strengths became slight weaknesses. Perceived weaknesses became strengths.
One of the pivotal moments of the year came at the trade deadline, where the RLEC made the Blazers the debutante at the Trader's Ball. Several established veterans were reportedly in play at the deadline. The team elected to stand pat. They were going to win or lose with this group of guys, for this year anyway.
Several observers noted that Portland's play in the weeks leading up to the deadline had become less consistent, more fractured. After the deadline passed the team went on a roll again, culminating in the aforementioned March blitz. They had put themselves in position to make a serious bid for a mid-level playoff position, an achievement which would have been considered a long shot going into the season.
In their way, though, was a nasty little coda to the regular season: a stretch of 11 games against Western Conference opponents, 6 of whom sat directly in the tight-packed race with Portland. Only 5 of those 11 games were on the road, however, and only 2 of those road games were against playoff-caliber teams. Nevertheless the Blazers were walking a razor's edge. A couple losses meant the difference between 2nd place in the conference and 8th. The Blazers would have to dig deeper and pull out an amazing run to stay in the hunt.
Portland responded by winning 10 of those final 11 games, capturing a 54-28 record, tied with San Antonio and Denver behind only the conference-leading L*kers. Their sole loss in that stretch came on the road to the Houston Rockets, an event which would prefigure the coming post-season. Tiebreaker rules put Portland third in the triangle with the Nuggets and Spurs, leaving them the 4th seed with homecourt advantage in the first round against 5th place Houston.
Portland managed their astonishing record through fairly basic means. Their identity started on the boards, claiming defensive rebounds to limit opponent possessions and offensive rebounds to bolster their own scoring. They played an extremely efficient, though hardly high-octane, offensive game. They keyed off of Brandon Roy and LaMarcus Aldridge putting pressure on the defense. If they were defended straight up the Blazers' stars scored. If the defense shifted to help, Portland's outside shooters made them pay or the centers got the team another possession off of the suddenly-available rebound. Everybody worked hard. Everybody trusted each other. Everybody hit the open shot.
On defense the Blazers relied on interchangeability and help. Few outside of the centers and rookie Nicolas Batum (now firmly ensconced in the starting lineup because of his defense) possessed overwhelming defensive ability. The guards in particular struggled with any scheme more complex than simply staying in front of their own man. So the Blazers switched often on picks and clogged the paint on all penetration, ceding jumpers and three-point shots, playing the percentages. Though the defense was not as effective as the offense the combination of length, rebounding, and occasional grit sufficed to get them through.
When in doubt, the ace in the hole remained as it had been since that glorious finish against Houston so early in the season: get the ball to Brandon Roy and depend on him to score. Time after time Brandon lived up to the challenge...almost to the point of giving Portland an air of invincibility. With more comeback wins under their belt than any team in the league, the feeling was that you could knock the Blazers down but you couldn't keep them there. Somehow, some way this team would find the path to the "W".
In a mirror image to the start of the regular season, the wide-eyed eagerness surrounding the team's prospects was quickly disabused in the first playoff game versus the Rockets. The Rockets were as big as or bigger than the Blazers, just as talented, far more experienced and hungry, and they had superior defensive chops. Teams that rely on offense run hot and cold while teams that rely on defense can play the same way forever. Such was the case here. The Blazers, perhaps over-amped, perhaps flustered, missed shots they had been making all season. The Rockets shut down the Portland rebounding attack with disturbing ease, finding it as easy as bumping the Blazer centers around or taking them out of position with penetration. On the other end they bullied and slashed the Blazer defense. The end result was a stunning 27-point blowout on Portland's home floor, where much of that air of invincibility had been built.
Portland managed 107 points behind Brandon Roy's 42 in a victory in the second game but lost a pair on Houston's home court, continuing the string of road futility. The Blazers had a chance to win each of those two games but, in another reversal of fortune, seemed to come up with the wrong play instead of the right one at critical moments. Late-game turnovers, missed rebounds, and forced shots did them in as well as the lack of a third scorer to break the Rockets' defense bending to guard Portland's stars.
Though Portland mustered one last hurrah in Game 5 as both main scorers went for 25 points they got manhandled again in Game 6 in Houston, falling by 16 and ended the series and the season.
The aftermath of 2008-09 is a lot of joy and appreciation mingled with a little bit of concern. The joy comes from the fantastic record, the amazing achievement of finishing 4th in the West, and the way the Blazers not only met but exceeded every goal they set for themselves during the course of the year. The New Era Blazers haven't exactly arrived but we've had a sneak peek and they look good. There is no standard by which you can consider this season anything less then a wild success. The only complaints would be of the "We could have been slightly more successful" variety, but those are akin to complaining they don't have thirty-TWO flavors at Baskin-Robbins.
The mild concern comes from some of the developments in the post-season which were less revelatory than extensions of nagging problems all year getting exposed in the focused spotlight of the playoffs. The Rockets were a difficult matchup for Portland but the way they were so easily able to counter the Blazers' strengths was disturbing. The loss of rebounding, the linchpin of Portland's success, was dramatic and simply achieved. Where is more rebounding going to come from when you're already at or near the top of the league? Brandon Roy's heroics, an enormous asset during the regular season, looked to be a weakness when he was the only Blazer who could score. Just because he is capable of handling the pressure of taking over a game doesn't mean the team is best served by ceding him those responsibilities, particularly when that involves standing around and watching him score. LaMarcus Aldridge didn't emerge until late in the series. Several Blazers never emerged. Portland was not able to contain Houston on defense either. It's hard to see where improvement will come from there without personnel changes. A team that started the year assuming it would have extra cards to choose from now faces the reality that it may be drawing from a short deck. The Blazers will not be satisfied with another 54-win campaign and first-round exit next year. They want more. Where will that "more" come from?
The good news is that time, cohesiveness, infrastructure, and even some measure of cap flexibility are all on Portland's side. Though the questions aren't answered yet the Blazers have ample resources to address them. The lack of movement at the trade deadline, possibly costing Portland a chance to win their playoff series, may not extend through the summer. 54 wins is a flashing neon sign announcing that the days of potential for this team and its players are drawing abruptly to a close while the days of consistent success as the primary concern are nigh. The Blazers no longer have the luxury of making decisions as a young and growing team alone. They must make decisions as a playoff team and as the contending team they hope to be soon. That's a far different mindset than we've seen in seasons past. That could make this off-season as interesting as any we've seen in the past few years.
The final summation of this season is a positive one. This was simply the best, most exciting, and most effectively executed campaign since the 1999-2000 season. Even then people more or less expected that All-Star conglomeration to do well. We have not seen a sense of wonder like this since the late-80's Drexler-led teams started to emerge. That's quite an accomplishment. This was quite a season.
Next Up: A player-by-player rundown of each current Blazer (one each day) including this season's performance, what it indicates, what the team will be looking for and needing from them in the off-season through next year, and guesses at future prospects with the team. This will be followed by the voting for the Blazersedge end-of-season awards and then it's on to the draft.
--Dave (blazersub@yahoo.com)
62 comments
|
3 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Portland followed up its riotous early success with a 9-5 January, a 7-5 February, and an 11-5 March.
fastest. 3 months. ever?
by Ben Golliver on May 5, 2009 12:45 AM PDT up reply actions
Yes. Especially since all the pre-deadline topics and ideas are coming back now :)
I’m feeling very February right now.
but...
That’s cheating!!! I’m telling. DAVE!! DAVE!!!!
The Kings have the best bench I’ve seen. There are easily 14 guys on this team good enough for every bench in the league. Now if we could only get some starters, I’d totally jizz in my pants.
Kings fan
by dyshooter182 on May 5, 2009 12:48 AM PDT up reply actions
Why I'm gonna delete your comment
and ban you all to…uhhh…ohhhh…never mind.
Ben is first, y’all.
—Dave
That makes this a game thread, right?
What a joy filled season. And what an amazing blog experience. Thanks to you Dave, and you Ben, and so many others here I consider friends. It brightens my day to log on here and enjoy all of you. ty
Bedge or go home.
Thanks Dave!
Your calm demeanor talked me off many a bridge during the season, and I passed that zen goodness on to my friends when they started eying bridges with a speculative eye.
You and Ben made the season a lot of fun, and it is appreciated.
by TheThinWhiteDuke on May 5, 2009 1:30 AM PDT reply actions
Awsome Season.....
great post, thanks Ben and Dave for all the hard work this year!
by blazerbeliever97504 on May 5, 2009 1:36 AM PDT reply actions
Awesome post. What a ride. Can’t wait til next season. So stoked to have found BE and looking forward to being around for the whole season this time, contributing more fanposts and analysis as well.
BTW I can’t be the only one taking unusual pleasure in seeing the Lakers have eerily identical problems with Houston as the Rockets presented us in the first round. What’s that? Aaron Brooks making your veteran PG look like he’s pushing 50? Can’t get calls in the paint or establish any consistent low-post offense with your 20 ppg PF? And you say your All-Star SG is having to create everything himself? Gosh, that sounds so familiar, talk about the oddest sensation of deja vu…
"I take the little gummy bear Flintstones vitamins…I try not to eat the lady. I try not to eat the man. Just give me the car. I try to find the car. Yea, worst case scenario, I eat the lady." - Ron Artest, 2009
I thought the exact same thing
In this case I hope it continues. Nothing like seeing the L*kers struggle.
"I saw him in the face" Sergio's quote on the latest alley-oop to Rudy.
by blazermaniac32 on May 5, 2009 7:01 AM PDT up reply actions
Nice work Mr. Dave
Way to skip over your desire to get Shaq at the trade deadline. Well played. ;-)
" i wish you were my dad :)" - In Walks Rudy
Great Season!!!
even better since joining BlazersEdge.
"Awesome! Totally awesome! All right, Hamilton!"
Very nice.
I do, however wonder if you are overplaying the worries, in an effort to be even-handed.
For example, in answer to your question: "Where is more rebounding going to come from when you’re already at or near the top of the league? " the answer is simple – from within. Greg Oden should be able to improve his rebound totals through improved athletic conditioning, experience, lessening of foul trouble and greater minutes. LaMarcus upped his rebounding the 2nd half of the season and looks as if he still has room to grow. Rebounding from the Sf spot is still questionable, but either Batum could improve or Martell could fill that hole. Finally, should Portland add the rebounding backup 4 everyone seems to want, the last possible weak spot for collecting rebounds is gone.
I can’t get too worried about how easily Houston was able to counter Portland in the playoffs. For one, the NBA has always been in large part about matchups. Houston matched up well with the Blazers, both in the regular season and the playoffs. Had it been the Jazz, Spurs or Hornets, we might still be watching Blazer basketball.
For another, the Rockets had, as you point out, both experience and hunger going for them in this series. Leaving any questions regarding officiating aside, those two factors alone can be enough to swing a close series.
So, while the series loss to Houston highlighted some areas Portland still needs to improve on, it was not an indictment that this team is still lacking the personnel to advance further.
hakkaa päälle !
Houston better thank us for toughening them up :P
"We really don't reference the rulebook." ~Joe Borgia, NBA VP of referee operations, to Henry Abbot regarding the calling (or lack thereof) of traveling.
portland...
just needed to excute down the stretch better, or not put the ball in the hands of blake/outlaw with 15 seconds or less. roy or rudy. or pick and pop play with aldridge. ahhhh.
"Awesome! Totally awesome! All right, Hamilton!"
Dave's "Eyore" tendencies are showing
As I recall, our fearless leader predicted 45 or 46 wins for the team entering the season. The median guess here on the sight was 50-51, and the actual results were, of course, 54.
Dave seems to tend towards viewing the glass as half empty. This is good for lowering expectations, preventing disappointment, and keeping rampant homer-ism in check. On the other hand, sometimes it is simply no fun!
Natural maturation and experience will address many of the issues raised in the Houston series. Even if the Blazers made no major off-season moves, I think it would be entirely reasonable to expect 60 wins next year and a top two seed in the play-offs.
We know, however, that KP is not going to stand pat when we have the assets that we do. Most of us have identified three areas for specific improvement (not in order of priority):
1) Back-up PF, we need a banger, low-post scorer who can act as an alternative to Trout for certain match-ups and situations
2) Improved scoring at SF. Hopefully, this is simply a matter of bringing Martell back and allowing Nic to grow-up.
3) Improved PG play. I think this is the most contentious. Personally, I think it gets down to a question of whether or not KP can find a veteran PG who is a significant upgrade over Blake, particularly on the defensive end. It also depends on KP and Nate’s evaluation of Bayless. If they think there is a high probability that he can develop into a successful starter in the next year or two then the pressure to bring in a vet is reduced. If they have serious doubt they should definitely make a move. If we don’t have to spend our cap room on a PG, maybe we can bring in a veteran 3, but I think a PG is probably the highest priority.
I think the two biggest determinants of the teams progress will be Martell and Greg. Which Martell will show up in October: the hesitant Martell, who never quite gets his confidence and is inconsistent on defense, or the budding star ready to take a big step forward? Which Greg shows up: the one who is unsure and awkward and fails to adjust to the whistles, or the one who is ready to dominate the boards and begin to establish his rule in the paint?
by upper left corner on May 5, 2009 8:49 AM PDT up reply actions
I would say your last paragraph nails it.
If I had to pick the top two developments that could mean Portland taking another big leap – and getting to 60 wins is a big leap – I would say that Greg and Martell are it.
I know back up PF – aka the Banger – is frequently mentioned here (I’ve done so a time or too myself), but has anyone given thought that we may already have the player? In fact we may have more than one candidate for the position.
1) Joel Pryzbilla – should Greg Oden be able to up his minutes next season, there is no good reason for them to come at Joel’s expense.
2) Mike Ruffin – in the NBA’s dictionary his photo is included in the entry on prototypical low post banger. Ruffin is experienced, hard working, has a reputation for being a good teammate and lockerroom influence, is inexpensive and a decent low post defender and very good rebounder.
3) Shavlick Randolph – many here might think I’m really stretching on this one, but I disagree. My impression of Shav’s game is he is a very lunch pail kind of guy in the box. But as a bonus, he has a fair amount of uptown to his game as well. I believe Randolph could provide offense as well as being the rebounding banger we all seem to want.
hakkaa päälle !
lakers...
pulled out the win huh?? went to bed earlier.. and just pulled up BE.
"Awesome! Totally awesome! All right, Hamilton!"
nevermind...
rockets beat the lakers last night!!! woot wooot.
"Awesome! Totally awesome! All right, Hamilton!"
batum's rebounding numbers are better than webster's
so improved rebounding with Martell back is likely wishful thinking.
I'm really looking forward to seeing Batum's game grow
I feel like he’s the one guy who’s potential is still untapped.
Don't forget Greg....
…..he has barely scratched the surface.
by upper left corner on May 5, 2009 8:52 AM PDT up reply actions
I won't say Aldridge has reached his peak...
… but after 3 years of relatively slow improvement, saying he’s barely scratched his surface is ludicrous.
the whole teams potential is barely scratched
for the first 1/3 of the year, i was shocked that 2 of the oldest players in the rotation had the most dramatic improvement…blake and pryz, and you might throw trout in that mix as well. with that said the entire team has tremendous potential. watch next year as brandon turns into a bonafide superstar…portland fans already recognize it, but the rest of the nba fans will be forced to believe it next year. greg is going to come off with a strong start as well or else he will be constantly hounded by local and national media. LMa is going to take that next step in becoming an all star hopefully as Duncan and Dirk continue to age. Martell hopefully has that breakout year that was robbed of him this year. Hopefully Bayless can produce on the court like KP knew he could when we traded for him.
I got 6 years of playoff blue balls going on, and I'm ready to release. GO BLAZERS. ~Mortimer
by Philthyanimal on May 5, 2009 6:41 PM PDT up reply actions
I don't expect to see a huge boost from Martell
He’s another Blazer with lots of potential, but hasn’t ever really been great, and that has not played bastketball in a full year. I wouldn’t expect too much from him, other than to clog the SF position. In fact, I think an upgrade at the SF is the most likely result of the offseason, since there are some excellent opportunities there, unlike at PG.
I will be happy if Martell makes a full recovery from his injury,
even if his game regresses next season.
Miller's an UFA
you don’t think he’s an excellent opportunity?
The Michael Ruffin of BlazersEdge, cuz Amlmart said so.
by BlazersOrBust on May 5, 2009 10:58 AM PDT up reply actions
After reading 3pointer, BlazersOrBust, and timg56's posts in order, I think there was some ...
miscommunication here.
1. 3 pointer ends his post with “SF is the most likely result of the offseason, since there are some excellent opportunities there, unlike PG.”
While I don’t necessarily agree with that comment, it’s important to the disconnect here.
2. BlazersOrBust wrote “Miller’s an UFA […] think he’s an excellent opportunity?”
In that comment, I now believe he was referring to Andre Miller.
3. In reply to BlazersOrBust, timg56 wrote “How much did Anthony offer you to post that?”
Obviously, timg56 mistook Andre Miller for Mike Miller.
4. Finally, I mentioned that “Mike Miller isn’t a free agent.”
Anyway, let me explains my thoughts on everything.
1. Andre Miller isn’t the point guard who should be sought after this off-season; rather, a trade of Steve Blake and Travis Outlaw to the Chicago Bulls for Kirk Hinrich is a much-needed transaction.
2. If the Bulls subsequently waive Blake and he re-signs with the Portland Trail Blazers after the July moratorium, then I’m all for trading Martell Webster, Jerryd Bayless, and Sergio Rodriguez to the Minnestoa Timberwolves for Mike Miller — whose contract expires after the 2009-2010 season — to be an offensively versatile, highly efficient sixth man off of the bench at small forward. Unlike Webster, Miller has a proven track record and doesn’t have any injury concerns.
Well, that’s that.
Indeed
I was referring to Andre, and while I (like you) would prefer that we add Hinrich, Miller is certainly an upgrade over Blake…especially at 2 yr/10 million with a team option for the third year.
The Michael Ruffin of BlazersEdge, cuz Amlmart said so.
by BlazersOrBust on May 5, 2009 2:16 PM PDT up reply actions
Yep, my mistake.
I took 3pointer’s comment to be about the SF position and when BlazersOrBust suggested Miller, I made the mistake of assuming Mike, not Andre.
hakkaa päälle !
partially agree
Martell shown huge improvement in the Sacramento preseason game. He was practically a brand new player. I’m hoping for big things from Martell. I do agree that the SF pool is a lot deeper than the PG pool on the trading block and in free agency.
I got 6 years of playoff blue balls going on, and I'm ready to release. GO BLAZERS. ~Mortimer
by Philthyanimal on May 5, 2009 6:43 PM PDT up reply actions
Wait a minute...
How can we recap the season without a single mention of “the letter” or the Darius Miles situation?
I was having an interesting discussion the other day about whether or not “the letter” (obviously the letter being Larry Miller’s manifesto threatening legal action for signing Darius Miles) prevented or discouraged KP from trading the RLEC. We obviously knew that there were offers on the table (the most written about being Batum+RLEC-for-Gerald Wallace or Vince Carter) but without the cap room available from Miles’ medical retirement, the Blazers brass seemed content to “let the cake bake…”
So, what of it? It’s probably one of the few dark spots on the season… How much of an impact did it have?
"Now, you take a bobcat or a Jayhawk. You know they'll run if you give 'em the chance. But when one don't run, why, you shoot him and shoot him quick. Raef's my dog, Pa. I've gotta do what's right..." Old Yeller (1957)
by RoyGoesTheDynamite on May 5, 2009 8:37 AM PDT reply actions
If it kept Nic in black and red, then it was a great thing....
…..Nic will be awesome long after Carter and Wallace are gone.
by upper left corner on May 5, 2009 8:55 AM PDT up reply actions
I found myself smiling as I was reading this.
Very nice Dave.
Great summation Dave.
Can’t wait to check back and read the daily reviews of each Blazer.
"Respect everyone, fear no one." -TP
Thanks for this Dave
You are absolutely correct. This was certainly the most exciting Blazers season in recent memory.
The trouble with exceediing expectations this year is that it sets the bar higher for next year, until eventually, only a championship will suffice.
I have a feeling that 10 years from now when we look back on what the Blazers have accomplished, this season will remain special.
Only 7 teams in the NBA
Has 54 wins or better, 3 at 54, thus we are really tied for the 4th best regular season record in the NBA.
4th best in the NBA? Youngest team in the NBA? Best Offense? Team built thru the draft?!! Even without RLEC trade and with Darius Miles fiasco?
Does this team have potential or what!!!
Thank you Dave, Ben. You guys are a joy to read. Dave makes me laugh every day. I loved the 32 flavors comment today.
Assimilation and Rotation
I still have questions about next years rotation? Do we really play 9-10 players off the bench nightly? Portland is stacked and with Martell coming back it will be just one more player trying to get minutes. KP last night on courtside said that keeping this team together was the top priority of the offseason. There has to be questions surrounding Sergio, Frye, Blake, Outlaw, and even to some extent Martell going into next season.
If Martell comes back and plays like everyone predicted he would this season and Bayless breaks into the rotation there will be some quality players riding the pine.
I try to help with everything," Fernandez said. "If the coach says go rebound, I go rebound. I work for the team.
""If I'm playing this game to get media and attention, I shouldn't be here," Aldridge said. "I'm here to play basketball, and do what I can do to help this team win."
His stare became blank. It was apparent he was back in that place, on the Rose Garden's logo, picking up Aaron Brooks as the crowd nervously roared.
One of the most over played discussion issues is rotation numbers.
What is the big deal about Portland playing 8, 9, 10 or more players? Where is it written in stone that you can’t play more than 8? The truth is, it isn’t.
Some folks point to the playoffs and say “look how teams narrow down their rotations”. So? When we get back to the playoffs, Nate can worry about the issue. Until then, it isn’t something to worry about.
Others will point to the fact that the average NBA player sets great store in starting and getting lots of minutes. This may be true. But for one, it is not up to the players to dictate to the coach and GM how they will be used and for another, opur guys have already demonstrated to a large degree that they understand success, as measured by victories, playoff appearences and titles, is driven as much , if not more, by teamwork and unselfishness. My guess is that guys like Brandon and LaMarcus are willing to spend games having as much time sitting as playing – with the caveat of the second unit doing well, preserving or extending the lead. Some rest from time to time is appreciated during the grind of a long season.
Being able to trot out a second set of 5 guys is a bonus and a strength, not a weakness. Why people want to say otherwise doesn’t make much sense to this observer.
hakkaa päälle !
Also
At any given time, you are going to have one or two guys who can’t play due to injury or other factors. So if you want to be able to have 8 or 9 quality guys on the floor every night, then you really have to have 10 or 11 quality players on the roster. Planning for injuries is smart.
Reg season vs Playoff depth
I for one love the depth on our team. It was great having a solid bench that takes the load off of our starters. However you take away that 9th and 10th player off the bench…and our bench isn’t that strong as it was. We may not have the best 6th, 7th, or 8th men…but as a group of 5 they were solid. You could easily see during our playoff series that the shortened rotation hurt our team.
The staff needs to make a decision if we are going to run a deep 10 man rotation, or if we should just acquire a solid 6th man and go with a shortened rotation.
I got 6 years of playoff blue balls going on, and I'm ready to release. GO BLAZERS. ~Mortimer
by Philthyanimal on May 5, 2009 6:48 PM PDT up reply actions
As usual.....
it’s another GREAT post by Dave. As if he makes any other kind.
I still think most of us are selling short the idea that organic growth will be substantila for a team this young. This season revealed some holes, but still racked up 54 wins. Let’s just think about that for a moment……that’s a better record than 8 of the 11 seasons Clyde was a Blazer.
KP2 showed us there is a correlation between team age and winning. It stands to reason that we will see a continued upward track for this team, albeit at a slower pace.
I can’t WAIT until next season.
Natural evolution
I will be surprised if the team does not win 60 next year.
I expect at least one major trade or FA acquisition.
I expect a couple of other new players through the draft, minor trades, or through reeling in previously drafted player (Freeland).
I predict that the teams improvement will be most impacted by three developments:
1) Major acquisition: do we get a PG, a SF, or a surprise in our box of Cracker Jacks?
2) Which Greg Oden shows up to work in October: the one who is unsure and awkward and fails to adjust to the whistles, or the one who is ready to dominate the boards and begin to establish his rule in the paint?
3) Which Martell will show up in October: the hesitant Martell, who never quite gets his confidence and is inconsistent on defense, or the budding star with the silky smooth stroke who spreads the floor and gives Brandon room to operate. If Martell can step up he will also make it possible for Bayless to get on the floor more because we will be less reliant on Blake’s spot up shooting.
Imagine: Oden (with an improving low post game), LMA, Martell (with an ability to put the ball on the floor and get to the rim), Roy and Bayless (with his outside shot). 5 guys who can all score. Speed, strength, and length.
The future is very bright.
by upper left corner on May 5, 2009 12:36 PM PDT reply actions
at this point...each additional win is exponentially tougher to get
i’d love to get 60 wins, and i think we could get there, but i wouldn’t be disappointed or surprised if we don’t either.
for me, winning more games won’t necessarily prove much. i just want to see this team reach some intangible goals…such as mental toughness, confidence, and not getting awe struck against elite teams (which they said they were during some games this year). i don’t want our team to have to think of playing the lakers or the celtics as “big games” but just regular ones because we are just as good as them.
I got 6 years of playoff blue balls going on, and I'm ready to release. GO BLAZERS. ~Mortimer
by Philthyanimal on May 5, 2009 6:54 PM PDT up reply actions
Home court, home court, home court.
Elite teams have elite records. It is extremely rare for a team seeded lower than top 2 or 3 to actually make the NBA Finals. We should be squeezing every available win to get to that level.
The primary thing keeping the Blazers from that level this year was their road record against good teams. With more experience and maturity and a little more respect from the refs, winning an additional 6 games, barring major injuries, does not strike me as being at all out of reach. I fully expect the number of home blow-outs to continue to rise. But improved defense will be the real key to winning on the road on nights when our shots are not falling at a high clip.
by upper left corner on May 5, 2009 7:39 PM PDT up reply actions
true
but we had the exact same record as the 2 seed. 55 wins would have put us in the same position as 60.
I got 6 years of playoff blue balls going on, and I'm ready to release. GO BLAZERS. ~Mortimer
by Philthyanimal on May 5, 2009 8:01 PM PDT up reply actions
I'm ready for Oden to break out
I’ve been watching him play since he was a sophomore in high school, and I still believe he will be a star. Confidence will come. No center in the league other than Howard and Shaq can rival him in size and strength. It’s only a matter of time until he’s putting up 20/20 games.
"I saw a commercial on late night TV, it said,'Forget everything you know about slipcovers.' So I did. And it was a load off my mind. Then the commercial tried to sell me slipcovers, and I didn't know what the hell they were."
-Mitch Hedberg
The Jinx
The Nuggets effectively handed over the first round jinx to BRoy and Blazer Nation on the last day of the season. By letting the Blazers blow them out and subsequently raising payoff expectations for your team, lead to the first round THUD you saw. Good luck figuring it out before all these young stars’ contract are up for renegotiation.
Go Nuggets
Yeah that's it
Yao and the rest of his teammates had nothing to do with it.
I can’t wait for the lamentations of other fans when Paul Allen pays all his young stars.

by 





















