Season in Statistics: Rebounding and a Couple Differentials
Here's the conclusion of our statistical look at the Portland Trail Blazers' 2008-09 season. This post covers rebounding and some overall differentials that weren't spelled out entirely in the previous posts.
| Statistic | 2008-2009 | Rank | 2007-2008 | Net Change |
| Defensive Rebounds | 28.8 | 27th | 29.7 | -0.9 |
| Def. Rebounding % | 75.0% | 5th (tie) | 71.8% | +3.2% |
| Offensive Rebounds | 12.9 | 1st | 11.0 | +1.9 |
| Off. Rebounding % | 32.6% | 1st | 26.7% | +5.9% |
| Total Rebounds | 41.7 | 12th (tie) | 40.7 | +1.0 |
| Total Rebounding% | 53.4% | 1st | 49.3% | +4.1% |
| Rebounding Differential | +5.4 | 1st | -1.0 | +6.4 |
| Turnover Differential | +0.3 | 11th | -0.4 | +0.7 |
| Point Differential | +5.3 | 5th | -1.0 | +6.3 |
| Total Wins | 54 | 7th | 41 | +13 |
This chart shows where the bread and butter of Portland's improvement came from this year. The rebounding stats went off the chart. Over 3% to the positive defensively, almost 6% offensively, over 4% overall. Last year the Blazers didn't grab half of the total rebounds available between the two teams on the floor. This year they lead the league, topping 53%. 1st in percentage offensively, 5th defensively, 1st overall...that's dominating. Plus the rebounding differential skyrocketed from the negative to a league-leading +5.4. Rebounding keyed everything for the Blazers: offense, defense, tempo. When they didn't rebound they didn't win. It was pretty much as simple as that.
The more interesting discussion is why the Blazers were able to make these kinds of gains. The most correct answer is also the simplest: Greg Oden. Joel Przybilla averaged 0.3 rebounds more this season than last year. LaMarcus Aldridge lost 0.1. Brandon Roy remained even. Travis Outlaw lost 0.5. Channing Frye's rebounds got sawn in half though his minutes, while obviously fewer, didn't drop correspondingly. Nicolas Batum did average as many rebounds in shorter minutes as Martell Webster did the year before but that's still not enough to swing the tide. The monster difference-maker was Greg Oden and his 7 rebounds in 21.5 minutes per game. Anyone wholly disappointed with Greg's season would do well to look at the upsurge in rebounding and how much it ended up meaning to this team. He's not the sole reason, of course, but he's a big one.
Continuing on, Point Differential is the best single statistical measure of a team's overall health and you can see that the Blazers leapt to the moon here as well. A 6.3 point gain is astronomical in a league where a couple points per game on average determine victory or defeat.
Obviously the most important leap is the last one listed, the leap from 41 wins to 54. This is the third straight year the Blazers have trended significantly positive in overall wins. They jumped 11 in 2006-07, 9 more in 2007-08, and 13 this season, a 33-game turn-around in three years. This advance was also the hardest of the three by far. Going from bad to mediocre is exponentially easier than going from mediocre to good.
Going from good to a true contender is also a huge step. It will be interesting to see how and where the Blazers make improvements. It's easy to see where the weaker areas have been statistically. It's harder to figure how they're going to improve some of them without sacrificing others.
It's relatively easy to look at recent gains and say that the jump from 54 to 60 wins is next up. But the Blazers will likely find these akin to the last five yards before the end zone in football. You just gained 75 but bundled all together they don't match the intensity of this final stretch.
The questions at hand:
How important was rebounding to the Blazers this year? Do you think they can sustain their league-leading pace? To what do you attribute the improvement?
Do you see further gains coming organically from this team? If so specifically where and how? If not, what needs to be done to shake out those last few wins to put Portland in contention?
Have at it below.
--Dave (blazersub@yahoo.com)
28 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
27th in the league in defensive rebounds? Fire Channing Frye!
Hehe nah, for real, it was great to see us winning the rebounding battle this year. To go from a -1.0 to a +5.4 is insane. Greg Oden certainly contributed, and it’s obvious that most of the rest of the team stepped up as well.
Great to see. Hopefully the only thing that causes us to get fewer rebounds next year is the fact that we’re making more shots. :-)
acta est fabula plaudite -- Thanks for a great season.
We won't have to worry about rebounding for many, many years
that is all
"It’s a good ol’ fashioned Rip City beat down!"
Experience will lead to improvement
Greg Oden should be able to stay out of foul trouble better, having gained experience and having the refs more familiar with him. Every minute he plays is more rebounding dominance.
Nic Batum has great potential, more experience and confidence will mean more rebounds (and more production generally).
As I recall, Martell Webster is a good rebounder, having him back will also help.
Having more competition for playing time should push Travis Outlaw to work harder – he has the physical gifts to be a tremendous contributor on the boards with a little more effort.
Rebounding should become even more of a strength.
Greg's already very good rebounding numbers should only go up in the coming years
We complain that he has not gotten his speed and athleticism back when discussing his defense. But he is already such a huge body you can’t easily push away and adept enough at boxing out that he can gobble up rebounds against most other big men. He also has excellent hands (I remember that one-handed rebound high behind his head against Philly). When he can jump even higher and move in position faster, that should help him especially on the offensive boards.
We don’t have to discuss that Joel is a rebounding monster, his rebounding percentage on the defensive boards was extremely high this season (33.1%) for a player who gets regular rotation minutes.
LaMarcus is not exactly a rebounding monster, but decent about on the level of Lamar Odom, Udonis Haslem or Dirk Nowitzki and one rebound per game behind All-Star (debatable) David West. If he could further improve by this one (West) or two (Gasol) rebounds per game, that should really help to make the frontcourt unbeatable on the battle for rebounds.
Brandon is very good at rebounding for a guard, one of only 15 players who primarily played guard this season with a rebounding percentage higher than 7% and more than 300 boards total (and that list includes Durant who I don’t see as a guard). He is on a level with the best guys there like Wade and almost Kobe, see Basketball Reference.
A nice contribution came from Rudy who is very good at anticipating balls that bounce further away. He already got over 200 rebounds this season which I think is strong for a rookie with his minutes (he is on a level with Chalmers and Gordon who got over 600 more minutes).
Blake got his numbers from last year again with 2.5 per game (2.4 last year) which is not great but okay for a point guard.
Travis unfortunately has regressed a bit again from 4.6 to 4.1 per game this year despite getting one more minute per game (331 total, minus 45 year on year). He has all the tools to be a very good rebounding forward with his elite athleticism and long arms, but too often seems to take a play off and let others (or the opposition when things go wrong) take the rebound. It’s no coincidence Rice (and the coaches) challenge him to work harder in that category. Per 36 minutes, Nicolas already beat him by .1 (5.4 to 5.3) registering 220 total in limited minutes.
But overall as Dave has pointed out, this is already a very good rebounding team and I don’t see why it shouldn’t get even better.
I'm not sure Outlaw's rebounding weakness is motivational.
The ability to read the arc of the shot so that you know in what direction the rebound will go is one of those skills that’s hard to teach.
Width and strength are more important than height and leaping ability.
Motivation can make the most of what you have, but it won’t necessarily make you great at rebounding.
exactly why DeJuan Blair is a dominant rebounder
it’s about width, strength, and the rebounder’s intuition… some guys just know where the ball will end up. Blair had fascinating remarks on how he judges where a ball will end up.
draft dejuan blair
Great Leapers need to Learn to BLOCK-OUT
Travis could be a much better rebounder if he would just put a body on somebody. If you are only trying to rebound by jumping, the ball has to come right to you. If you block out irst, then you have a much wider area from which to get the ball.
Having a nose for the ball is important too, but that implies that you are hanging around in the paint, something Travis is not very fond of.
Travis's Mom says Travis should rebound better.
He should listen to Mom.
"The match in Los Angeles is a good opportunity to begin to demonstrate that we want to make war." Rudy Fernández (translated)
LaMarcus, in the same league as Odom???
Um, have you been smoking something?
In case you’ve gotten tunnel vision, let’s just remind those reading that Lamar Odom has had multiple 20+ rebounding games this season. He has been averaging over 10+ rebounds over the last couple of months. Since when has LaMarcus even done that?
I can’t even remember if LaMarcus has had a 20+ rebound game in his career. And beyond that he hasn’t averaged double digit rebounds over a two month span ever either.
Sorry to say but LaMarcus is not in the same breath as Odom as far as rebounding goes.
(I hate the lakers but I am still honest.)
Odom is indeed a significantly better rebounder than LaMarcus, but recall that Portland's slow pace makes the disparity appear worse than it actually is.
And we have Oden/Przybilla on the floor 90% of the time.
When Bynum plays, Odom comes off the bench and they don’t play together a ton.
Odom is still probably the better rebounder, but it’s not as big as the numbers make it out to be.
I'm leaving the post because the point is solid
but can we lay off the “have you been smoking something” stuff…not just ECF but other folks as well. That kind of thing has become more common around here and it doesn’t do the conversation any good. It’s potentially inflammatory and adds nothing to the point made. Potential Cost > Potential Benefit.
—Dave
You're right
I will stop with the Snide comments and inferences that may or may not suggest a poorly thought out post. As I am not perfect at thinking my own post out clearly before hand either.
But seriously, I am waiting to hear to some big news from KP and the Trailblazers about hooking Greg up with some former All-Star center like David Robinson or Alonzo Mourning. When will it happen, please?
This post does a great job of illustrating the ignorance of the Colin Cowheards of the world
Not only is Oden not a bust, he is already showing his dominance. It is just that at this point, he is not dominating as a low post scorer. He is dominating as a rebounder.
Joel and Greg are both top ten in rebounds per minute. I don’t believe there is another team with two dominant rebounding centers (although LA comes close with Bynum and Gasol). Under no circumstances should the team consider trading Pryz. Having two great centers is right up there with having Brandon as a key to our success.
Another point, I think it is reasonable to argue that LaMarcus deserves some accolades although his rate per game dipped slightly. Last year LMA spent a fair percentage of his playing time at center or at power forward next to Channing. This year, he kept his numbers almost the same while playing almost exclusively at PF next to the human rebound vacuum that is “Gregzilla.” Staying even was actually an indication of improvement. As I recall, LMA’s rebounding stats were at about 7 for the first half of the season. In order to end as 7.5 he must have been around 8.0 for the last half. That is pretty darn good for a guy who plays a little farther out on the offensive end. If LMA can average over 8 next year, I think we should all be pleased.
by upper left corner on May 4, 2009 7:55 AM PDT reply actions 1 recs
lol I would contribute the 'improvement' to SHOOTING A BUNCH MORE JUMPERS
How many more jumpers did this team take than in years past? That’s your key.
Blazer Fan
attribute, contribute, whatever
Blazer Fan
by leeroyjenkins on May 4, 2009 8:15 AM PDT up reply actions
hey, we should have an edit feature
naaaaaaaah
Blazer Fan
by leeroyjenkins on May 4, 2009 8:15 AM PDT up reply actions
Umm...
Points in the paint this year: 38.3
Last year: 30.8
Some of these are from offensive rebounds some are not. Since we don’t take more shots than last year, but we score more in the paint, logic states that we are NOT shooting a bunch more jumpers.
My answers to your questions:
1) Far and away the most important. Unless I am recalling the early 90’s Blazers incorrectly, the reason they were feared opponents was because they were one of the biggest teams in the league and controlled the boards. I seem to recall that everything came from that ability to dominate the boards.
2) Yes. As Norsktroll points out, it is reasonable to expect Greg to get better. And as upper corner reminds us, LaMarcus was picking up his pace during the second half of the season.
3) I don’t have to attribute it to anything. You’ve answered that question already. Greg Oden, plus a healthy, motivated, relaxed Joel Pryzbilla.
4) I think that simple growth is going to play a big part in Portland improving their win total by 5 – 8 games next season. By himself, a healthy Martell represents a better improvement than any player we could draft with a lottery selection. Besides Oden likely getting better, I’m convinced that what we have seen of LaMarcus is just scratching the surface. I think he’s going to be the kind of player that Rasheed Wallace could have been – one of the top two or three PF’s in the game. I can’t imagine Rudy and Nic not getting better next season. Even Steve Blake is likely to improve his game. The really smart ones never stop refining their game. There are still aspects to Blake’s game we haven’t seen. For example he is a much better passer on the break than what most fans think. We don’t see that because the opportunity is not there in Nate’s offense. I also believe that we are going to see more penetration from Steve in the future.
Next season should see a Blazer team that is far more comfortable. They are going to have the confidence that comes with knowing that McMillan’s way of playing basketball works and, just as important, understanding it to the point they do it without thinking about it. I think that’s something that many of the critics of either Nate or some of the players haven’t recognized. For the past three seasons McMillan has been teaching his guys how to play the game. The focus has been on learning and development more than just winning games. This season, we started seeing the results of that work. Next season is when I think it really pays off.
hakkaa päälle !
by timg56 on May 4, 2009 9:02 AM PDT reply actions 4 recs
Growth seems so underrated
as a factor in improvement. Yet with such a young gteam, I believe it is a factor that the Blazers can count on for several more seasons. Even if the roster doesn’t change one bit.
crashing the boards with more than one man
This really popped out at me during our series with Houston. We usually had only one guy go aggressively after a rebound. If that guys was Greg or Joel we did okay on the defensive board but not so much on offense. Houston on the other hand, regularly sent two or three guys after the board which allowed them to steal a few extra rebounds. It should be simple to alwas send a guard/wing after the board along with our center. Having two guys goings after the board will help immensly. It’s kind of like when Roy rebounds his own miss, except we do that on the defensive glass as well and its by whichever wing is closest to the weay the ball bounces. Sending three guys back on defense should be enought ot stop the fast break. This one change if taken to heart could take our already very good rebounding to another level, game-chainging domination.
Where is the statistic for passing the ball effectively after rebounding?
Portland is no doubt a good rebounding team. Now the next step is to do something with the ball once you get it. I want to see a concerted effort to move the ball to 1/2 court as much as possible. This requires two things, 1) good passing from the rebounder, and 2) being in position to get the ball.

by 































