Miller skips out on team meeting
Is a 33 year old miller with an attitude our answer at point.
almost 3 years ago
svlittle
13 comments
0 recs |
Comments
"Miller's agent, Andy Miller, said he talked with Andre Miller and the guard was not taking a stance. Miller thought the meetings were optional."
Uh, yeah, I’ve never been a fan of guys that skip optional meetings. Shows lack of commitment.
"Respect everyone, fear no one." -TP
The Miami Heat could use Andre Miller.
The Miami Heat also need a low-post scorer, with restricted free-agent David Lee making a lot of sense down in South Beach. It, however, would take a gigantic sign-and-trade deal to make Lee joining the Heat a reality, but a frontline tandem of him and Jermaine O’Neal would be a nice setup. Lee would play center on offense and power forward on defense, while O’Neal would play power forward on offense and center on defense.
Anyhow, here’s my idea of getting Lee in Miami.
1. On 7/8/2009, the New York Knicks re-sign Lee to a six-year, $60,000,000 contract, with non-escalating salaries of $10,000,000 annually and an early termination option he can exercise after the fourth season.
2. The Knicks and Heat subsequently complete the following trade.
FROM MIAMI & TO NEW YORK
C Mark Blount ($7,967,375)
PF Udonis Haslem ($7,100,000)
SF Dorell Wright ($2,887,165)
SG Yakhouba Diawara ($945,000)
Outgoing: $18,899,540 X 125% + $100,000 = 23,724,425
Incoming: $22,075,486
FROM NEW YORK & TO MIAMI
C Eddy Curry ($10,500,423) {15% Trade Kicker}
PF David Lee ($10,000,000) {Base-Year Compensation Player}
Outgoing: $15,500,423 X 125% + $100,000 = $19,475,528
Incoming: $18,899,540
3. The Knicks receive four players who’ve got expiring contracts, which helps the team in its objective of clearing as much salary cap space as is possible for the summer of 2010. In this proposed deal, the Knicks cut $11,276,863 in salary obligations for the 2010-2011 season. Yet, for the upcoming season, Udonis Haslem is the only one who’s got any on-court value; thus, Donnie Walsh would release Mark Blount, Dorell Wright, and Yakhouba Diawara.
Thats quite a diatribe.
yet it has really nothing to do with Andre Miller. I’m confused!
"Respect everyone, fear no one." -TP
neither anything with miller nor the blazers....
"its tough to play with one eye, unless you're a pirate." Delonte West
"una canasta a Pau en la cara" Rudy
by Honka Playboy on May 3, 2009 4:32 PM PDT up reply actions
WOW, Yeah you put a lot of time and effort into an off topic post.
I don’t think andre Miller is the answer he is too old for the Portland TrailBlazers
"Knowledge will get you from A to B. Creativity will get you anywhere." Einstein
by Garden of ODEN on May 3, 2009 3:10 PM PDT up reply actions
AK - I thought you'd be as interested in the fact that Theo Ratliff skipped the same meeting
he’ an unrestricted FA, right? Maybe the third big man you’ve been craving. He is a fantastic person, a professional, liked Portland while he was here, and would be a fine defensive mentor for young GO. His offensive skills, not so much. Stick him in your trade machine
"its tough to play with one eye, unless you're a pirate." Delonte West
"una canasta a Pau en la cara" Rudy
by Honka Playboy on May 3, 2009 4:30 PM PDT up reply actions
At the third-string center spot, I want a true 7-footer who plays back-to-the-basket offense ...
and is serviceable on man-to-man low-post defense. Theo Ratliff, however, is a homeless man’s Marcus Camby — since he faces up offensively and is a weakside shot blocking specialist rather than a rugged one-on-one defender — which puts him in the exact same category as over-the-hill, washed-up has-beens like Adonal Foyle and Calvin Booth. Heck, I totally expect Ratliff, Foyle, and Booth to all retire this summer.
Miller's attitude and availability don't concern me. He's not for us either way.
His 28% 3pt shooting this year was a whopping 7% higher than his career avg of 21%. Miller shoots a few % better than Blake overall, but that’s probably largely due to the fact that he averages <1 3pt attempt per game, compared to Blake’s almost 5.
Admittedly, I haven’t watched him play in too many games, but my understanding is his defense is lousy. Isn’t that the main complaint with Blake? Blake also has a better assist to turnover ratio. I simply don’t see what Miller adds. It sounds like he may actually take away.
2 hot 2 stop it
Where do you get that his defense is lousy? I've never heard anything of the sort
Miller brings a lot more offense than Steve Blake. Look at their career offensive numbers. Miller’s (15 ppg, 4 reb, 7 assts, 2 TO) are much much better than Blake’s (7, 2, 4, 1.5). Now you could make that argument Miller is too old and that what he brings isn’t worth paying that much for. But I think he’s a heck of a lot better option than Kirk Heinrich for example.
Blazer Fan
by leeroyjenkins on May 4, 2009 7:52 AM PDT up reply actions
I think you underestimate
Blake’s ability to spread the floor.
You put Miller in there with Roy and you’ve got two guys with a good ability to get in the paint. The problem with that is that Miller’s skillset doesn’t compliment Roy’s at all. Opponents will clog the middle and force you outside. Blake draws out the defender to help clear the lane for Roy, making it easier for him to finish.
"Respect everyone, fear no one." -TP




















