Blazers should play more fast paced
The Blazers should play to their strengths in the second unit. I dont like the idea of trying to change Jerryd into the point guard of the future by making him a true pass first point guard.
I think that we should run more in the scond team becuase thats what our bench does best. Jerryd could lead the team with the fast paced offense and Rudy would excel while getting open shoots due to Jerryd penetrating. Outlaw and Rudy on the wings with Bayless getting to the rim would be great. Oden would get more open looks and might play a little better than he did in the half court offense.
I then think we should get a PF who could run with the second unit and make us more dangerous with his abilty in the fast paced offense. I have stated before that i like the idea of Siging Pops Mensah Bonsu to play in that unit but being the 11th or 12th man off the bench. I have thought about Chris Wilcox or maybe Antonio Mcdyess but i have decided that i think we should trade for Boris Diaw. Maybe mid second round we could draft Josh Hytvelt from Gonzaga or Jeff Pendergraph from Arizona State. Who both and known as workhorses and both can shoot and bang down low. Maybe even bring over Joel Freeland. Who knows
Boris Diaw has the potential to be great in the fast paced offense we should run. Yes he has a big contract but i would like the idea of trading our 1st round draft pick and sergio and maybe a sign and trade with Channing Frye for him. Diaw can shoot well and could also fill in for L.A. in the starting lineup if he needs too. He is coming off 2 bad years in a row and could come at a cheaper price then he usually would have.
We obvioulsy need a starting point guard but i dont think we should get it throught he draft in Ricky Rubio or Brandon Jennings. I dont even think we should go for Andre Miller or Jason Kidd. I think that we should trade Blake and our early second round pick to Indiana for T.J. Ford. I like Ford alot and mock drafts have the Pacers taking Eric Maynor so maybe T.J. is on the trading block. I think that we have a better chance of getting Ford then we would of getting Hinrich or somebody like that. Indiana only has 2 picks with the 13th and 52nd so they could possibly like the idea of having another draft pick to possibly make more deals. I say once we get rid of Sergio we can bring over Petteri Koponen to be our 3rd point guard.
PG: Ford, Bayless, Koponen
SG: Roy, Rudy, Webster
SF: Batum, Outlaw
PF: L.A., Diaw, Draft pick {Hytvelt, Pendergraph} maybe Joel Freeland
C: Pryzbilla, Oden
What u think
80 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I think TJ Ford is there for the taking
If we want him… Might not be a bad pickup actually as a 3rd or 4th option for a PG at the right price.
"There goes Brandon Roy... the best there ever was in this game"
TJ Ford refused to be the 2nd option.
I doubt he wants less than five minutes a game as a 3rd or 4th option
I think he meant something else
I think he meant as a 3rd or 4th option for us at point guard. Probably with Andre Miller and Kirk Hinrich ahead of TJ Ford. I think we could get Ford and he is a pretty good point guard who can still improve.
He means that TJ Ford threw a hissy fit in Toronto
When Calderon outplayed him and won the starting job while TJ was out with an injury. It’s why he got traded to the Pacers. He is a little bit “me first”.
dinasour type of guys choir boys
i think that can change
I think for the sake of going depp in the playoffs that he would play team ball. He really wouldnt have anybody to compete with if we traded Blake. Plus him and Lamarcus have the Texas connection going on. Might help
He had problems in Toronto w/Calderon, and in Indy w/Jack
0-2.
Why be the team that gives him the opportunity to get a 3rd strike?
dinasour type of guys choir boys
by mittsabishy on May 14, 2009 10:09 PM PDT up reply actions
He had legit competition
in toronto with calderon but come on there aint no problems in indiana. They all know up there that TJ is the better point guard. He wouldnt have any competiton here for the starting job. I think if you can explain to Jerryd that he has the run of the second team and give him playing time there wouldnt be a problem. Really nobody is perfect though. It dosent matter who they bring in. Somebodys going to have a problem with him and have something bad to say. TJ is a good point guard and its realistic to get him its not realisticto get some of the guys people are drooling over.
There was a ton of problems in indy
Moreso than in Toronto. He got in a brawl with Jack didn’t he?
I got 6 years of playoff blue balls going on, and I'm ready to release. GO BLAZERS. ~Mortimer
by Philthyanimal on May 14, 2009 10:39 PM PDT up reply actions
History of problems
Here ya go – http://dimemag.com/2009/03/tj-ford-and-jarrett-jack-fight/
As far as character guys…Ron Artest has come a longer way than Ford has come.
I got 6 years of playoff blue balls going on, and I'm ready to release. GO BLAZERS. ~Mortimer
by Philthyanimal on May 14, 2009 10:42 PM PDT up reply actions
if Artest can change im sure TJ can
by that article im sure indiana would be happy to get rid of him. I think at least we could give him a shot and if anything get rid of him at the end of the season when he becomes a free agent. Ron Artest has become likeable and i dont see why TJ cant be the same
Artest cares about winning
TJ cares about himself the same way AI does. Why pick up TJ when we had Jack at a substantially reduced cost? You could make the argument that TJ is only marginally better.
Picking up Ford would go against the mantra KP set when he took over as GM. Character before talent. Artest has demonstrated that he has changed, so picking him up would be different than picking up Ford who has demonstrated that he could start fights with Jack. Ford has the luxury of shooting whatever contested shot he wants in Indy as a primary option. He won’t get that luxury here.
I got 6 years of playoff blue balls going on, and I'm ready to release. GO BLAZERS. ~Mortimer
by Philthyanimal on May 14, 2009 11:05 PM PDT up reply actions
0-3
Milwaukie as well.
I got 6 years of playoff blue balls going on, and I'm ready to release. GO BLAZERS. ~Mortimer
by Philthyanimal on May 14, 2009 11:22 PM PDT up reply actions
Character over talent only gets you so far
Imma let you think and tell me what championship teams have had no bad players on there team. No me first players. There arent alot of teams like that. We need to just teach TJ to fight with the other teams not his own. Milwaukie and Toronto he was traded becuase they already had point guards better than Ford. The last time i checked he is still in Indiana. You cant always have the players you want. Its not possible. If he dont work out we can just not resign him. We arent going to win with Blake as point guard and if we want to trade and get Rubio thats setting us up for a long term failure instead of a 1 year thing
this city has backed this team
bc of likable players. i will continue to buy tix as long as they aren’t an embarrassment to this city…rings or not. the spurs didn’t have any character issues…nor did the rockets in the 90s…or the bulls 1st 3 peat.
I got 6 years of playoff blue balls going on, and I'm ready to release. GO BLAZERS. ~Mortimer
by Philthyanimal on May 14, 2009 11:35 PM PDT up reply actions
Not all players have aspirations of winning
Some are just there to chase money. Nothing wrong with that.
I got 6 years of playoff blue balls going on, and I'm ready to release. GO BLAZERS. ~Mortimer
by Philthyanimal on May 14, 2009 10:38 PM PDT up reply actions
Although I am not a fan of TJ
you can’t argue that he isn’t a winner. Everywhere he has played has one more games, and when he left they lost. This is true for Milwaukee, Toronto, and Indiana so far.
TJ is a winner. But he also has issues with being a me first player.
"It's not who jumps the highest -- it's who wants it the most" Buck Williams
"and if EVERYONE confronted with a tough, disgusting situation pulled out, I don't think I would have been born." Mortimer
by Fund A Mental on May 15, 2009 10:06 AM PDT up reply actions
There's a reason why he's available.
It’s not lack of talent. He’s a d-bag.
Jarrett Jack was known as one of the most likeable guys in the locker room. Given Ford’s history and Jarrett’s reputation, I’d say Ford was probably at fault. I think JJ called him out for his selfish play. I’d pass.
Love the enthusiasm.
I think Diaw would rather be more of a featured peice than an 11th or 12th man though. He’s good and has been a great fit in Charlotte. TJ (and his contract) would pretty much have to earn starter minutes to be worthwhile. Good ideas.
"The Edge... there is no honest way to explain it because the only people who really know where it is are the ones who have gone over."
Diaw would be a huge part of our team
Diaw would be able to give Lamarcus a rest and bring in the second team and just let them run and tire out the other team. TJ has the Texas connerction with Lamarcus and has the ability to be a very good starter in this league. He can score and can also pass the ball so that would be what we need a good point guard who can set up the offense and also be our 3rd scorer
Larry Brown reportedly pushed Michael Jordan and Rod Higgins into getting Boris Diaw and Raja Bell, ...
so they’re not going to be dealt anywhere.
If there so in love with him
then why are the bobcats really interested in grabbing Rasheed Wallace and moving him to the backup role
A frontcourt of Emeka Okafor, Boris Diaw, and Rasheed Wallace could work well as a unit if the ...
Charlotte Bobcats swing a sign-and-trade deal this summer whereby “Sheed” is acquired for Gerald Wallace. On offense, Okafor can play the pivot down on the low block, Diaw can play power forward by manning the high-post, and Wallace can camp out at the weakside corner as a small forward; in turn, Wallace can body up man-to-man against opposing centers, Okafor can provide weakside help and contain opposing power forwards, and Diaw can defend small forwards one-on-one on the perimeter.
It’s not Diaw who Brown wanted to be dealt elsewhere this past season, but rather “Crash” Wallace. However, it’s been recently reported by Rick Bonnell of the Charlotte Observer that “Wallace needed coaching and he absorbs it from Brown with humility and attention […] understands this is his chance to grow, and Brown loves the savvy questions Wallace asks during practice.”
http://www.charlotteobserver.com/206/story/702404.html
As a result, it seems that the Bobcats main moves this off-season will be simple in nature. First and foremost, Raymond Felton will most likely be re-signed to a reasonable contract. Next, the 12th pick in the 2009 NBA Draft will possibly be used to select a defensive-minded shooting guard (e.g., Tyreke Evans) to learn under the ropes of Raja Bell for one season. Lastly, one or both of its second-round draft picks will be used on potential replacements for fatty Sean May and the aging Juwan Howard as Diaw’s backup (e.g., Taj Gibson, Jeff Pendergraph, et al.) due to Alexis Anjica being a downright bust.
I dont see that happening
Although you make it sound very interesting i think that they wouldnt want Sheed playing the 3. If i were the bobcats i would rather have Diaw but if they are willing to give him up i think the blazers would find a sopt of the team to give him touches. I dont think you can call Anjica a bust yet he is still young and needs to bulk up and show some more willingness to work hard and be commited which he clearly is not
I don't think that Rasheed Wallace will join the Charlotte Bobcats, either, since it'd take a ...
sign-and-trade to do it — which isn’t in the Detroit Pistons best interest, for that ballclub wants to clear salary cap space this off-season to reportedly sign Carlos Boozer — plus, Larry Brown has gotten along with his frontcourt of Emeka Okafor, Boris Diaw, and Gerald Wallace.
For “Sheed’s” sake, however, he should just be willing to take a reduction in salary and chase another ring by signing a one-year contract worth the mid-level exception with the San Antonio Spurs. Wallace’s immense pride and hubris might prevent him from doing that, though, so he may be out of luck and just hang it up this summer.
http://www.fannation.com/truth_and_rumors/view/101736-rasheed-wallace-may-retire
I can't begin to say how much I hate Diaw's contract
Which he got in the one year he played really good replacing Amare during microfracture rehab. I was really surprised the Suns found a taker for that ugly deal with Diaw attached. I don’t want it anywhere near the Blazers.
T.J. Ford might work, though he wouldn’t improve our defense. Koponen isn’t NBA ready.
"Officiating has to be a science, not an art" - Rick Carlisle
diaw does have un ugly contract
he is a decent backup player and regardless of what people say i think he can be traded and i wouldnt mind seeing him with the second team coming off the bench. I do like TJ Ford a whole lot and im really suprised that his name isnt really coming up too much. I dont know much about Koponen but i know he almost made the team last year so i figured he improved from last year
BIG NO to Ford
We had J Jack who beat out Ford. Why get Ford now when we could have hung on to Jack and gave him a bigger role (Granted I’m very anti Jack). Ford will disrupt our chemistry and will not take a lesser role on our team.
I got 6 years of playoff blue balls going on, and I'm ready to release. GO BLAZERS. ~Mortimer
There is a good thing about ford
We can give Ford a shot and if he dosent prove that he can led the team then just let him go because he will be a free agent next summer and we can either move Bayless to the starting position or go out and get somebody else. He wont have to take a lesser role if we can make him the starter.
Matching Salaries
I’m not a trade guru or anything…but matching salaries to acquire ford in a trade would require us to give up 2 rotation players…Frye and SF/Blake or Sergio/Cash.
If we give up Blake…then we are taking a big gamble with Ford. If he doesn’t pan out then its going to cost us some wins.
If we give up Sergio…then Ford starts and Blake comes off the bench it still doesnt solve your post about getting the 2nd unit to run more. Blake is horrible running the break. He may not have been as bad as Jack…but he is well below average.
Ford in the starting unit takes away touches from Brandon and LMA. We already have 2 main options on offense in the starting unit…we need to fill the other 3 spots with complimentary offensive players. If Greg develops as he should next season…what then? There’s no way all 4 players could get enough shots.
I got 6 years of playoff blue balls going on, and I'm ready to release. GO BLAZERS. ~Mortimer
by Philthyanimal on May 14, 2009 10:54 PM PDT up reply actions
But that goes for anybody
If we trade and get Andre Miller and it dosent work out with him then we lose games. People want sergio and channing gone anyway so it makes sense. We need a 3rd scorer to take touches away from LMA and Brandon. Teams are starting to realize that in the 4th quarter that brandon will have the ball. They know who are shooters are and we need somebody that can get them better looks and make sure Brandon does have to have the ball the whole 4th quarter.
our 4th quarter is fine with brandon having the ball
teams know its coming and they can’t stop it…much like teams know kobe and lebron will take over in crunch time. with all of our 4th quarter comebacks and differentials keeping teams honest in the 4th is the least of my concerns for this team.
I got 6 years of playoff blue balls going on, and I'm ready to release. GO BLAZERS. ~Mortimer
by Philthyanimal on May 14, 2009 11:30 PM PDT up reply actions
thast pretty cocky
Brandon isnt Kobe and Lebron. If we dont get a point guard who can take the pressure off Brandon with the ball handling then teams will stop him. They arent going to take the Blazers lightly next year
its not
bryon scott says roy is as tough to guard as wade, kobe, and lebron…even artest an all nba defender couldnt hold roy. roy did pretty well against the rockets when compared to kobe.
I got 6 years of playoff blue balls going on, and I'm ready to release. GO BLAZERS. ~Mortimer
by Philthyanimal on May 14, 2009 11:41 PM PDT up reply actions
Kobe has a better team
Look at the games that Roy exploded in points. The rest of the team didnt show up. Kobe has alot better options on his teams. If he wanted to score 50 on them im sure he could. Kobe sat out the whole 4th quarter in the bloqout a few nights ago. I dont remember Brandon getting the luxury
hmm link wont work
http://www.basketballprospectus.com/article.php?articleid=478
I got 6 years of playoff blue balls going on, and I'm ready to release. GO BLAZERS. ~Mortimer
by Philthyanimal on May 14, 2009 11:43 PM PDT up reply actions
good article
it said that Brandon hurt them when they tried to trap him. I dont think a few high scoring games will make them rethink trapping Roy because we have all seen the shooting go cold in Portland before. Rudy can go cold and if he does then we have no serious 3 pt shooter.
hypothetical lineup
well in your lineup we will have no 3 point threat in the starting lineup…teams will go zone and make it tough for brandon and ford to slash or lma to work down low. with batum and pryz not being offensive threats combined with the lack of a 3 point shooter to spread the defense i’d be very skeptical of much success. we tend to have sluggish starts in the first quarter bc of batum and pryz limitations already…not having a 3pt shooter will probably make thigns worse.
I got 6 years of playoff blue balls going on, and I'm ready to release. GO BLAZERS. ~Mortimer
by Philthyanimal on May 14, 2009 11:37 PM PDT up reply actions
Bring in rudy at 3
Bring in rudy to the starting lineup and have Batum and Outlaw play the 2 and the 3
Dude, Nate McMillan and T.J. Ford would mix like oil and water.
How does someone not recognize that’d be a match made in hell?
i dont see it
There arent many options at point guard out there right now. I think that TJ can change and like i said if it dosent work than dont re sign him.
Some remarks I made about Jerryd Bayless fitting in with Nate McMillan apply to T.J. Ford.
“Oh, and by the way, I’m not entirely sold that McMillan will adjust his offense to appease a gunner like Jerryd Bayless. It’s one thing when McMillan coached a dribble-drive point guard like Antonio Daniels, for he was very careful with the ball — as his assist-to-turnover ratio in 2003-2004 and 2004-2005 were both greater than 4:1 — and had a sharp-shooting backcourt partner in Ray Allen to mask his mediocre long-range shooting.”
http://www.blazersedge.com/2009/5/9/870797/buyers-sellers#15546884
Ford would be a downright terrible fit with the Portland Trail Blazers for many reasons, with his overpriced contract, inferior defense, so-so long-range shooting, small size, injury prone body, and reckless playmaking style being some of those said reasons. All in all, it’s an impractical idea.
his defense isnt that bad
i think that he would be able to stick with the quicker point guards alot better that Blake could. I dont think its as inpractical as wanting Jason Kidd or trading up and getting Ricky Rubio.
there arent many asking for kid or rubio
rubio is a pipe dream…no one is realistically thinking we can get him.
I got 6 years of playoff blue balls going on, and I'm ready to release. GO BLAZERS. ~Mortimer
by Philthyanimal on May 15, 2009 7:14 PM PDT up reply actions
Have you seen some of these posts
Everybody is talking about getting Rubio. maybe not so many for kidd but Rubio is blowing up there posts
just bc rubio is the talk around here doesnt mean
that anyone thinks we can get him. we have all been high on rubio here bc of amlmart and the spanish videos and translations he used to post up a few years ago.
I got 6 years of playoff blue balls going on, and I'm ready to release. GO BLAZERS. ~Mortimer
by Philthyanimal on May 15, 2009 7:21 PM PDT up reply actions
ok
i dont know why people would waste there time working out trade scenarios and working out contracts if they thinkwe cant get him
this is be...
its what we do…especially in the off season. its all in fun…hell look theres a trade thread for LBJ. the dedicated users of this site waste a ton of time here…why not have fun in the off season and dream a little?
I got 6 years of playoff blue balls going on, and I'm ready to release. GO BLAZERS. ~Mortimer
by Philthyanimal on May 15, 2009 7:26 PM PDT up reply actions
i think it takeds away from realistic choices
if people want him they should make reasonable offers for him. Not everybody on the team.
Fast Paced
I don’t think Nate knows how
It seems that everyone's real problem is they just don't drink enough coffee. They lose their edge, lose track of their priorities, and end up sleeping a third of their life away.
He better figure it out
i think our first team is ok and plays well with the half court game but our second unit with Rudy, Bayless and Batum need to run. Thats there strengths and they need to play to them.
Our 2nd team does run
Granted its not much since Sergio only played 5-15 mins a game.
I got 6 years of playoff blue balls going on, and I'm ready to release. GO BLAZERS. ~Mortimer
by Philthyanimal on May 14, 2009 10:48 PM PDT up reply actions
I know
Sergio aint coming back and we should make them run alot more. I think Bayless can run the second team better than Sergio. Im not a big fan of his and i think that Bayless could get to the basket easier. Kinda like a Monta Ellis without the jumpshot
Nate McMillan will continue to run his high/low zone offense; thus, if you want the Portland Trail ...
Blazers to immediately transform into some fast-paced, run-and-gun team, then it’d be in your best interest to call for McMillan’s head.
http://www.cybersportsusa.com/hooptactics/hilozone.asp
Under McMillan, the Trail Blazers are a squad that frequently runs half-court sets and rarely ever has broken plays or runs in transition. Yes, there are occasional fast breaks here and there — which was Sergio Rodriguez’s forte — but you can sure as heck bet that “Sarge” cringed during those moments.
They have the perfect tools for a fast paced run and gun second team
Why have somebody like rudy or bayless if you arent going to use his skill set in the fast break. I dont see Bayless doing well at all in the half court offense. They have alot of depth right now but if you take a step back and look. They are pieces to the wrong puzzle. Bayless and Rudy would excel in the fast paced offense. Im not talking like the suns but more fast paced thatn what it is. We are one of the most athletic teams in the nba but dont really show it because of our slow offense. I think thats why some people have to question is Nate really the coach we want to move forward with. After this season there is no looking back,
I like the fact that Nate hasn't pushed the tempo a whole lot.
By forcing the team to work in a half court set often he’s instilled some good fundamentals. I watched the Hawks in the playoffs and that team seems to have no idea how to play in the half court. Whenever they were forced to play slow, their offense stalled and it almost always seemed to result in a contested jumper. Our team knows how to play a slow paced game so teams can’t expect to slow down and hurt us.
That being said, hopefully Nate plans to work on pushing the pace so we can play better at a fast pace since it can be useful to have as a tool against some teams.
If you want to watch fast-paced, up-tempo basketball, then I suggest checking out some ...
women’s basketball games at the University of Oregon. With Paul Westhead there running the show — with an emphasis on “running” — that sloppy brand of basketball will undeniably rear its ugly head each and every game.
http://blog.oregonlive.com/behindducksbeat/2009/03/oregon_to_name_new_womens_bask.html
Oddly, I’d also be cool with replacing Nate McMillan. I, on the other hand, desire to hire a head coach whose focus is on defense, catering the offense to the center with a heavy dose of pick-‘n’-roll, and having a fiery personality that pushes his players on a daily basis.
Yes, the man who I want to coach the Portland Trail Blazers is none other than Jeff Van Gundy.
Lenny Wilkens
I think he would be a good fit for our blazers. Yes he is old and retired but he is still in the northwest and is one of the greatest baskeball minds to ever live. Just an idea
lol
that’d be amazing if he coached us…its 30+ years in the making.
I got 6 years of playoff blue balls going on, and I'm ready to release. GO BLAZERS. ~Mortimer
by Philthyanimal on May 15, 2009 7:15 PM PDT up reply actions
read my other post please
i thought hard at what we need and cam up with some good suggestions i think,
It dosent have anythin gto do with my inner idiot thinking we should have TJ Ford or Tim Thomas. Its a good post
hmm
i dont know about what your post is about i was just thinking it’d be funny as hell if wilkens coached us and got us a 2nd title…30 years after his first one.
I got 6 years of playoff blue balls going on, and I'm ready to release. GO BLAZERS. ~Mortimer
by Philthyanimal on May 15, 2009 7:24 PM PDT up reply actions
My post is realistic options that dont have character issues
and could help us out. that would be great. I think that if anybody could do it Wilkens would be the man to do it.
You should've seen the debacle that was Lenny Wilkens' last go-around with the ...
Seattle SuperSonics — wherein he was a total stooge for the Professional Basketball Club, LLC as vice chairman and, moreover, got canned after he was unable to handle the duties of hiring someone to run the basketball operations department by laughably naming himself to the position — which was a disgrace.
Whether it was pushing Dennis Johnson out of Seattle in 1980, drafting Danny Vranes in lieu of Orlando Woolridge with the 5th pick in the 1981 NBA Draft, being a piss-poor coach/GM during the early-’80s, coming back as an awful color commentator in 2006, and finally as an abject failure once again in the front office, Wilkens did more harm than good in Seattle after 1979.
But sometimes Nate wants them to run
Wasn’t McMillian the coach that was waving his hands and encouraging the guards to start the offense early in the shot clock, if the opportunity was there?
Sure, Brandon Roy plays at a slow pace. So when he’s on the floor (35+ out of 48 minutes) the team won’t run much, unless it has an obvious advantage. Blake is also not likely to penetrate all the way to the rim in transition. So I can see why you’d advocate a white unit running team
But I wouldn’t put it all on Nate and call him a “slow down only” coach. I’d rather add a starting point guard who can run a fast break (when it’s there) and wait and see how Brandon adjusts, before calling for Nate to be replaced with a D’Antoni-type coach. Efficient half court offense is more important in the post season than the transition game, anyway
Thats right
He did want them to start the offense early in the shot clock but i blame that on Blake for it not working. Blake isnt good at driving to the rim and i agree when you say that efficent half court offense in the playoffs is more efficent. I like the idea of having a first team with Brandon and L.A. who can play the half court and then bring a second unit with Bayless and Rudy who can run the floor. So we could have the best of both worlds.
Nate's math doesn't add up here
Fast breaks = layups and dunks. Who cares if there are turnovers thrown in there as well.
3 fast breaks = 1 layup, 1 dunk, and 1 turnover. Despite turning the ball over on 1/3 of your possessions you have an offensive efficiency of 133 points per 100 possessions. Sounds good to me.
The OP
has a lot of ideas
Come on you gotta listen unto me,
lay off that whiskey and let that cocaine be. ~Johnny Cash
oh, just that you make a lot of fan posts
decent content though. Seems like you think about basketball a lot. You should think about starting a blazer blog, generating regular content is one of the keys to a successful blog.
We can always use another (regularly updated) Blazers blog, I hate the ones that go months with no new content.
Come on you gotta listen unto me,
lay off that whiskey and let that cocaine be. ~Johnny Cash
by HurraKane212 on May 15, 2009 1:10 AM PDT up reply actions
I don't think bringing TJ Ford in is a good idea for us.
He has a very poor history with teams and teammates and no real signs that he’s maturing. If he was a player who we thought would be worth risking a cancer in the locker room then he better be one of two things: cheap or really, really good. At 9 million dollars he’s hardly cheap and he isn’t exactly a perennial all-star so he isn’t really a significant upgrade.
He is a winner though
I think he needs a good coach to go along with the winning. Where ever he has gone he hasnt really had a great coach. Nate is clearly the best coach would have played for in the NBA. I think he can clean up his act and i dont think he is a cancer yet. He could be if he does not have any discipline but i think the coaching staff with the blazers would give him the discipline that he needs
curious
what has he shown the the past few years that makes you think he is mature enough to clean up his act?
I got 6 years of playoff blue balls going on, and I'm ready to release. GO BLAZERS. ~Mortimer
by Philthyanimal on May 15, 2009 7:18 PM PDT up reply actions
He hasnt played for a good coach
He hasnt played for a team that that had any discipline. A few years ago wouldnt you say the same thing about Ron Artest. You never really know a guy until you actually know the guy. Im not saying i know him but at least give him a chance to prove you wrong
i wouldnt have given ron artest a chance
a few years ago bc he didnt demonstrate that he could change…he has now, so i’d consider it. why not let ford prove that he can change before we take a chance?
I got 6 years of playoff blue balls going on, and I'm ready to release. GO BLAZERS. ~Mortimer
by Philthyanimal on May 15, 2009 7:28 PM PDT up reply actions
The past 2 years provide sufficient evidence that Travis is not a 3
At least on our team. He can play spot minutes there, but power forward is his forte.
Travis is a 3.5
He’s too small at power forward. His vertical makes up for a lot of that but he gets pushed around. Can’t post up, block out or defend against a traditional pf.

by 
































