Back-Up Power Forward: Free Agents
Well it is finally THAT time… The Off-season: where we here at BlazersEdge get to discuss all the ins and outs of roster needs and wants etcetera etcetera…
For Portland to be a “fully-equiped” playoff basketball team, the Blazers roster is going to need to maintain a Post presence through even the worst NBA playoff officiating (kind of like we saw in this series)… which means Mr. Pritchard and his crew are going to need to address the Back-up Power Forward role. With the two towers of 7’0” Joel Pryzbilla and 7’0” Greg Oden at center, with 6’11” LaMarcus Aldridge at the starting power forward. Currently, Portland uses 6’9” versatile forward Travis Outlaw as their back-up 4 to create mismatches or plugs in rarely used LMA-clone 6’11” Channing Frye in cases where there are foul troubles and we need that big body. Problem is that Channing Frye is an expiring contract and becomes a Restricted Free Agent this off-season.
A month ago I would have said that Portland should use its 2009 1st Round pick on a PF/C to come in and be that back-up role to LaMarcus. But after looking at the draft prospects and the free agents list, I have concluded that Portland would probably be better served NOT counting on a rookie in that role, but rather going for a player who is already in the association. Plus, a flexible KP on draft day is a beautiful thing to have in our corner. Here is a link to my 2009 Mock Draft 1.0 if you wanted to check this out: http://www.blazersedge.com/2009/4/7/826702/2009-mock-draft-10
Will Frye be resigned and stay in Portland? Or, maybe Frye is used as a sign-N-trade player for another need/want. Will Travis be kept to remain as a mismatch in the second units as he did so well this season? One thing is for sure, there are other players out there who are becoming Un-restricted Free Agents this summer and one of them COULD be the answer KP and crew are looking for. If you haven’t seen it, here is the link for the List of 2009 Free Agents: http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/news/story?page=FreeAgents-09-10
Of this list of Free Agents I picked out three power forwards who would meet the financial and physical criteria for this back-up role. Here are the options I came up with:
Drew Gooden (unrestricted)
Age 27, 6’10” 250lbs, Kansas
11.9 points, 7.1 rebounds, 0.4 blocks, 48% FG
2009 Salary: $1,410,441
Chris Wilcox (unrestricted)
Age 26, 6’10” 235lbs, Maryland
7.2 points, 4.5 rebounds, 0.3 blocks, 52% FG
2009 Salary: $6,750,000
Brandon Bass (unrestricted)
Age 24, 6’8” 250lbs, LUS
8.5 points, 4.5 rebounds, 0.7 blocks, 49% FG
2009 Salary: $826,269
Channing Frye (RFA)
Age 25, 6’11” 245lbs, Arizona
4.2 points, 2.2 rebounds, 0.3 blocks, 46% FG
2009 Salary: $3,163,769
I kept Channing on the list, but I want to hear from you guys. OF THIS LIST, who do you like the most? Why? Then, is there another free agent in this seasons crop that might work better at a reasonable price?
115 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I like Wilcox here...
He is strong, has height, and is a good rebounder. We need a banger. His 6 fouls keep Oden on the court longer as well.
this has been a message from: "The People's Alliance to give Greg Oden at Least a Couple of Seasons"
I like Wilcox or Gooden...
I guess I am hoping we get one of the 6’10" guys to stick with the theme of Portland having size advantages EVERYWHERE on the roster… but my gut feeling was that Brandon Bass was the guy who was going to get the most votes.
Wilcox or Gooden.
by Portland Dynasty on May 1, 2009 1:30 PM PDT up reply actions
Gooden is like a slightly overweight Channing.
We need to get tougher. Wilcox is much more of a tough-guy than Gooden. I agree about the size advantage though.
this has been a message from: "The People's Alliance to give Greg Oden at Least a Couple of Seasons"
Gooden
is a much better scorer. Neither present much on D
by TheGreatDane17 on May 1, 2009 9:45 PM PDT up reply actions
Gooden and Wilcox for much less money?
I have this feeling that because Cuban is so uncreative and doesn’t want to have to fish around the NBA, that he’ll want to do whatever he can to resign his player… so Brandon Bass might be the one of this bunch that gets an over inflated contract… Portland could probably still get him but they are going to have to pay lots of money. Is that so wise for a role player who is going to get 12-15 minutes per game?
I was thinking that with either Wilcox or Gooden both almost definitely going to resign places other than where they are at, and with the state of the economy that both of those guys are gonna be around $2 million per year or so. IF that is the case, I could see Portland signing either Wilcox or Gooden and still having enough cash to resign and retain Channing Frye!
Okay, hold your horses and don’t freak out on this idea. Lets be thinking depth. Right NOW our backup 4’s are Frye or Trout. Trout swings to the 4 and still has some marketable NBA upside, I guess so does Frye, but less because of the seasons stats this year… But if KP is going to leverage say Trout and Sergio or Trout and Blake (and neccessary draft picks) to acquire a player like Kirk Hinrich or something…. why wouldn’t they use remaining cap room on depth where Portland needs it?
Follow me here: a trade of Travis and Blake and a few 2nd rounders to Chicago for Kirk Hinrich. Sign Drew Gooden as a backup PF option, resign Channing Frye as another backup F option…. Then KP still has Sergio and the trade exception to package together and move Sergio to a team who wants a PG and wants to move some other player who costs a bit more….
PG Kirk Hinrich, Jerryd Bayless
SG Brandon Roy, Rudy Fernandez
SF Martell Webster, Nic Batum
PF LaMarcus Aldridge, Drew Gooden, Channing Frye
C Greg Oden, Joel Pryzbilla
… and Portland uses their mid-20’s first rounder this year on the best player available that KP can land. Is Hinrich enough of an upgrade with the overall experience boost of the team to make them a contender? I don’t know, but I do know that having Gooden AND Frye in the mix of foul-eaters and post players would give Portland the deepest front court in the NBA.
by Portland Dynasty on May 3, 2009 4:54 PM PDT up reply actions
Wilcox is probably the best choice here
as he’d give us a scoring threat in the frontcourt, which would be especially important if/when Nate decides to make Greg the starter. Wilcox can also play center fairly effectively, and would really give our second unit the option to get out and run.
"Smile! You're on a poster!!" - Mike Rice
I'm glad you kept Channing Frye in there.
Remember, the grass is always greener on the other side.
I'm not so sure about that
Dallas really likes what he brings to the table there, and are probably going to make him a solid offer. Wilcox has kind of been a forgotten commodity. During a 3 year span, he averaged no worse than 13.4 points, 7.0 rebounds and 52.4% shooting.
"Smile! You're on a poster!!" - Mike Rice
Interesting...
Wilcox may well be considered. He could be a nice option off the bench. Bass would provide more offense but Cuban will pay him too much.
Q: Is Greg favoring his knee?
Frye: He favors dunking on your head, that's what he favors.
I think all three free agent options have "Similar" value...
all could likely be gotten for contracts that are very very close. But yeah, Wilcox is a forgotten commodity and I can’t believe that no team is forced into keeping Gooden around as he seems so productive on both ends of the court.
by Portland Dynasty on May 1, 2009 1:32 PM PDT up reply actions
Villanueva is a Restricted Free Agent.... AND...
and, Charlie is not the type of player who is going to accept the role that Portland has. Think about the available minutes that said player is going to be understanding they might get in Portland? Villanueva is a primary option in Milwaukie and has great production over the past few seasons, I don’t see him considering Portland as he wants to be a starter. The other guys: Bass, Gooden and WIlcox are already established role players and can be gotten for reasonable role-player like contracts.
by Portland Dynasty on May 1, 2009 1:34 PM PDT up reply actions
Villanueva, Jefferson and Sessions
I don’t think the Bucks can afford to sign all 3 this summer. I’d make a strong offer for Ramon and see if they were interested in a sign and trade
All indications are that they are going to keep Sessions no matter what,
And not the other two if they get big contracts. So, Villanueva might be available, but I think he might be too good for us.. that is, some other team will give him a big contract worthy of a starter, not a backup to LMA. But, if teams are strapped for cash and we can pick him up for relatively cheap, do it in a heartbeat.
by two buck chuck on May 1, 2009 2:46 PM PDT up reply actions
what if we offer Sessions....
One-Hundred BILLION dollars (pinky to corner of mouth). What if Portland offers him a near max contract that is out of Milwaukie’s range is that enough to pry him away?
"Death is not final," Gita says. "If any man thinks that he slays, and if another thinks that he is slain, neither knows the truth. The Eternal in man cannot kill: the Eternal in man cannot die. The soul in man is neither born nor does it die. Weapons cannot cut it; fire cannot burn it; water cannot drown it.
The Bhagavad Gita
That has a decent chance of succeeding, but we could only offer what fits in our cap space so it's not really a max deal
"The playoffs now are my grind. My grind for a championship,'' Roy said. "Whatever needs to be done to get there I'm gonna do it.''
if they can't afford all three....
then bye-bye Jefferson.
by Portland Dynasty on May 1, 2009 4:09 PM PDT up reply actions
Charlie Villanueva is another hideous defender, à la Chris Wilcox and Drew Gooden.
All three of those guys shouldn’t be considered as options under any circumstances, unless you want the backup power forward spot to continually suffer from porous interior defense.
who isn't a hideous defender in your opinion?
Any player in the league who is NOT a super star you claim they are weak, hideous, garbage or whatever… seriously dude, do you understand that role players are building blocks and that there aren’t any perfect players out there except for LeBron?
Doubt it.
by Portland Dynasty on May 1, 2009 4:10 PM PDT up reply actions
I'm pretty finicky guy when it comes to defense.
That’s probably why Joel Przybilla is one of my favorite players on the Portland Trail Blazers.
Jarvis Varnado from Mississpi State?
http://www.draftexpress.com/profile/Jarvis-Varnado-1189/
Yes he is a small weight wise but 4.7 blocks per game is amazing no matter how you put it.
by TheGreatDane17 on May 1, 2009 9:49 PM PDT up reply actions
I only saw the games here in Portland during the tourney...
But Jarvis Varnado DID NOT look like an NBA role player at all. He was over powered all game long against non-NBA prospects. He is 6’9", long and has good timing… but I have zero belief that he is gonna be anything in the pro’s. He might get a 2nd round pick, but I highly doubt he’d ever be more than a D-league player.
by Portland Dynasty on May 1, 2009 9:58 PM PDT up reply actions
When I think of Jarvis Varnado, my mind conjures up shot blocking specialists ...
such as Joel Anthony, Adonal Foyle, or Theo Ratliff. The problem with those type of guys, however, is that’s their lone worthwhile skill. Anyhow, I also saw Varnardo get manhandled by the Washington Huskies during the 2009 NCAA Men’s Basketball Tournament — ableit I watched it on television rather than in person — so it’s hard for me to believe that he’ll be anything more than a scrub in the NBA or a D-League shot blocking specialist like Rod Benson.
Except of cours for your Mike Miller
obsession which is simply unexplainable.
"Death is not final," Gita says. "If any man thinks that he slays, and if another thinks that he is slain, neither knows the truth. The Eternal in man cannot kill: the Eternal in man cannot die. The soul in man is neither born nor does it die. Weapons cannot cut it; fire cannot burn it; water cannot drown it.
The Bhagavad Gita
we'll have some options
I like both Wilcox and Gooden.
We’ll probably be able to get a good backup pf ( better than frye) for relatively cheap.
I’d go after Gooden.
I'm not entirely sure I like any of those guys that much.
If I had to pick one, it would be Bass just because he’s got the potential to be better than he has been thus far. I’d actually rather keep Channing than those other guys though.
Then again, I have this funny feeling that KP will be addressing this issue some time around the draft. I predict that there’s a 0.000000007% chance that Pritchard doesn’t make a trade that day.
Yes! Yes! In the face!
I like Bass
I voted for Frye. – Elgin
Brandon Roy: Strengths-remarkably efficient player who appears to effortlessly score and facilitate. Weakness-he’s just a figment of your imagination. - Canis Hoopus
Gooden is awful
Every team Gooden has ever played for was better after he left, and worse because he got there. He did absolutely nothing for San Antonio. The Bulls were terrible until they traded him. And the Cavs almost immediately became a title contender without him screwing up the plays and jacking ill advised eighteen footers.
If you think Nate doesn’t play Channing, I would love to see the DNPs rack up for Gooden. That would be a terrible singing.
Both Wilcox and Bass have promise. Both are better options than Channing (hate to say it – if Frye stays, it should be as the 11th-13th man). Wilcox will come cheaper, Bass will bring more offense to the second unit.
Q: Is Greg favoring his knee?
Frye: He favors dunking on your head, that's what he favors.
Gooden: 10ppg in 16 minutes on 49% shooting
That’s some pretty efficient scoring. Also grabbed 4.4rpg, which makes him a more efficient rebounder than LMA.
Really?
Yeah, those are pretty impressive numbers. Not sure what to make of that. It is possible Gooden has become slightly underrated. Not somebody you want to hand 6-8 mil to, but for a 3-4 mil, maybe he’s not such a bad option as a warm body at PF.
Who am I kidding, I can’t bring myself to endorse him after watching him make the entire city of Cleveland dumber for a four year period. You think Trout has a low BBIQ, wait until the Gooden show rolls into town. It’s like he’s on laughing gas all the time.
His propensity for strange facial hair would be a good cultural fit, though, I have to admit.
Q: Is Greg favoring his knee?
Frye: He favors dunking on your head, that's what he favors.
I don't know enough about any of them (except Frye) to choose
but based on the stats, Gooden is the biggest guy with pretty substantially better numbers.
Gooden ain’t getting many votes. Does he have “locker room/team chemistry” issues? He is 27, still young but with experience.
It's spelled "PRZYBILLA."
vanillathrillagorillaprzybilla
by RenoBlazerFan on May 1, 2009 3:34 PM PDT up reply actions
Not locker room issues per se...
He’s just generally known as a space cadet. Can’t remember plays, gets caught day dreaming all the time on both ends, etc. Has always put up decent stats, does enough to keep you competitive, but never good enough or focused enough to be a key piece for a really GOOD team (although the Cavs did squeak through to the finals one year on Lebron’s historic performance in D-town).
Might not be a terrible option as a back up four, but I’d rather go another direction. I think that spot can be addressed in the draft (Blair, Patterson, even Hansborough) adequately – all the Blazers really need is a guy who can D up, rebound pretty well, and not do anything to screw up too badly.
Cap space is better spent, I think, consolidating talent at SF or PG. If Bayless and Nic start the year as the 11th and 12th guy on the bench, it would be a travesty.
Q: Is Greg favoring his knee?
Frye: He favors dunking on your head, that's what he favors.
haha--ok, thanks!
It's spelled "PRZYBILLA."
vanillathrillagorillaprzybilla
by RenoBlazerFan on May 1, 2009 3:51 PM PDT up reply actions
Gooden was supposed to do more for Cleveland than he could
We want a guy to go in for 12-15 minutes, get rebounds, bang a little bit, and help our second unit score.
I wouldn’t ask for him if we wanted a starter, luckily… we don’t!
Not to mention absorb fouls to keep Oden and Pryz playing...
Exactly the right point to make about minutes. WHOEVER the backup 4 signed will be, they will be on board for 12-15 per game aside from injury fill-in.
I don’t get all the negative garb about Gooden… I have never seen him Space Cadeting, or forgetting plays… I watched him in Cleveland, Chi-town and San Antonio and he is tough paint player who plays solid on both ends of the court. All three players: Bass, Wilcox and Gooden, are more than legitimate back-up power forwards for contending NBA teams. I also have read here that people belive Bass brings the most offensive game…. and I feel he doesn’t have near the offensive game that WIlcox and Gooden have.
by Portland Dynasty on May 1, 2009 4:18 PM PDT up reply actions
Gooden
There is no way on God’s green earth that KP goes after Gooden.
NO WAY.
MLB2PDX!!! (someday...)
by The Cactus Leaguer on May 2, 2009 8:48 PM PDT up reply actions
How about Collison or Haslem?
They might be a bit too close to starter material though. However, if LA went down we would be happy about that.
put a body on 'em
Haslem would love to play power forward and not center.
That guy is awesome.
"The brownies,'' Fernandez said after the game. "The brownies are good for me to make three-points.''
by Sabonis4Ever on May 1, 2009 10:38 PM PDT up reply actions
Haslem is UFA 2010... Collison is UFA 2011
Haslem is doable salary wise, but Collison is pretty expensive right now. I’d like to get Collison at a lesser price over Gooden or Wilcox…
But I would rather see Wilcox or Gooden be the backup 4 over Haslem.
by Portland Dynasty on May 1, 2009 4:24 PM PDT up reply actions
Haslem
is a beast. One of my favorite NBA role players.
by TheGreatDane17 on May 1, 2009 9:50 PM PDT up reply actions
I watched Wilcox for years on the Sonics
Trust me, you don’t want him. He’s lazy, doesn’t rebound or defend. The best part of his game is highlight dunks. Wilcox couldn’t get off the bench in OKC.
Gooden is rotten too as KP Corleone noted.
Bass is only guy I would consider in that poll. I rather have Outlaw play backup PF than the other 3 options.
Life is not by chance. Basketball is life.
Interesting point about rather wanting Outlaw than the options mentioned...
this is the type of thinking that I feel TONS of posters on this site should be thinking…
Not “We need to just cut Travis and move on” but rather “If we move Travis and Channing, what kind of players can we find to fill that role? So is it in our best interest to keep either of those guys?” It is pretty easy to daydream about having a roster full of Superstars, but this ain’t no video game.
by Portland Dynasty on May 1, 2009 4:28 PM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
KP Day Dreams about it
and makes it happen.
by TheGreatDane17 on May 1, 2009 9:50 PM PDT up reply actions
Wilcox has had plenty of chances to prove he can play
and hasn’t really taken advantage of them. If he was going to be more than a sometimes player, it would have happened by now.
I’ve always thought Gooden was a dog, but San Antonio signed him, and they’re usually pretty good at judging character. But he didn’t exactly set the world on fire playing for them.
I would try to get Bass, because he’s physical and plays tough. But I would expect Dallas to try to resign him, and you don’t want to overpay guys like that.
This kind of guy — the “poor man’s Blake Griffin” type — is usually available in the second half of the first round. How about drafting some banger, like a DeJuan Blair type? (Even assuming that Blair himself will be gone by the time we pick). Or do we just assume KP will draft the best Euro available and stash him in the Spanish league for a few years?
Blair will want more minutes
Then we can give
by TheGreatDane17 on May 1, 2009 9:57 PM PDT up reply actions
I suggested Wilcox, back at the trading deadline
But that was as part of a trade for Frye and Diogu. I wasn’t thinking about signing Chris beyond 2009 unless he really fit in well and helped the team win a playoff series or two
Of those 4 I chose Bass. He’s shorter but has a nice skillset that would compliment the current roster. The problem (as I’ve mentioned in the past) is that whoever the Blazers get to be LMA’s backup will have to be content playing very short minutes, unless there’s an injury or major foul trouble. This is not something a young FA like Bass will want to hear, he’d rather get a promise of a starting gig and that’s not going to happen in PDX
A better choice would be a veteran big man who can play PF/C and wants to win a ring. One name I thought of this week was Antonio McDyess. Somebody like that who will be content to play “only when needed” in the hopes of getting another sniff at the finals
I would say Bass
because he is younger (24) and is the only player on that list that has a good amount of room to continue growing. Wilcox is a lazy player and Gooden is pretty sloppy a lot of the time. Bass can come in and bang for a good few minutes at a time and really be effective. Also I assume if we are bringing in a backup PF than Travis would probably be pushed out of the second unit since we want Batum to play and also Martell. This means we need quick offense to replace Outlaw and Bass can bring that. I would say DeJuan Blair would be good as well but I am not sure about taking on another young project at this point.
Please do not feed the B-Rex
I think Outlaw is gone
Really, if the TBs add a solid backup for LMA and Webster returns healthy, where are Travis’ minutes going to come from? He’s not going to be happy with a reduced role, and Nic will need more PT behind Martell than he got as a “starter” this year
Let the “Outlaw as backup PF” experiment come to an end. Deal him to a non-contender like Memphis or Charlotte and let him continue his NBA career near home
Do we know Webster will come back healthy?
Word on the street is that his injury is pretty serious. While it may not be a career ender it most certainly could be a career effector.
by TrentEdwardsHoF2018 on May 1, 2009 3:04 PM PDT up reply actions
I believe Martell will be coming back and able to regain form...
It is like a 1 in a trillion shot that Martell’s foot injury from this season will be a career ender for him… I mean for cryin out loud Darious freaking Miles came back from an injury…
Martell will be back in full mutha-fizzin-a-physed next season.
by Portland Dynasty on May 1, 2009 4:38 PM PDT up reply actions
As also a Mavs fan (and ambassador to Mavs Moneyball) a few thoughts on Brandon Bass
The good: Still only 23 despite in his fourth year. The guy cares for winning games and will play physical under the basket, he rarely takes a night off. Used to playing 15 to 20 minutes and doesn’t except a big role, but can do more if need be due to injury. Has stabilized/repeated his FG% and TS% from last year at about 50 and 57 helped by a solid midrange jumpshot (good form, somewhat inconsistent). Can dribble and finish well with either hand, allowing him to drive to the rim in isolation plays often over the left baseline side. Very quick and high second jump to secure a tipped rebound. Had four double-doubles this season. Very solid from the free throw line when fouled, consistently well over 80%. Not very foul prone for an undersized guy at somewhat around 1.5PFs per game due to his lateral quickness. Very strong especially in the upper body, you can’t easily push him out of the way on offense or defense in post ups.
The bad: At 6’8’’ he is a bit undersized for the PF spot. Unable to block or contest some shots taller athletes could. Doesn’t really have a go-to move that he can always rely on. Should never take a three point shot again (has missed every single one so far), but fortunately rarely tries (11). While he can find the open man when he gets stuck in traffic is just a mediocre passer. Good understanding of team defense, but makes the occasional dumb play.
Financials: Attainable. He is an unrestricted free agent. Dallas likes him a lot, but they are way over the cap even if they let Kidd go for nothing. They only have his "Early Bird Rights" to go over the cap to re-sign their own free agent, since originally he was drafted by the Hornets who gave up on him (he had entered the draft clearly too early) and he signed with the Mavs in 2007 as a free agent. Which means they could offer him 175% of his previous salary (which is very low at $825,000; so not interesting) or the average player salary (whichever is greater). So no matter what they use, the most they can offer him is effectively a salary the size of the mid-level exception. Which in a simplified form is also what he is worth, a little more than the average player, with a current PER of 16.5 ;-)
P.S.: I would definitely try to bring Joel Freeland over anyway no matter which other player is retained or acquired for the big men out of Frye, Shav, Ruffin. I assume if KP can convince him to come over, the Blazers will do it, if only to have an upgrade in training to pitch guys against and give spot minutes to. The guy is younger than e.g. Hansbrough, has much better athletic abilities and has more upside (still learning the game).
I would also agree that looking at Charlie Villanueva as stated above is worth a try even though he might not be terribly interested to be the backup to LMA and thus might have trouble accepting such a role. Offensively he is currently one of the better ranked PFs (#12 in PER), and as was discussed before the deadline Milwaukee will have big trouble to keep Sessions AND Jefferson AND Villanueva. So he could be the odd man out.
Congrats to Houston. Beat LA!
Going forward Blazers have 5 draft picks, and Rockets have none :)
by Norsktroll on May 1, 2009 2:37 PM PDT reply actions 2 recs
A 175% raise for Brandon Bass -- who earned $826,269 this season -- would actually be $1,445,970.
http://members.cox.net/lmcoon/salarycap.htm#Q19
Anyway, I just expect the Dallas Mavericks to re-sign Brandon Bass with the Early Bird exception to a five-year, essentially mid-level contract with annual raises of 10.5%.
I agree about Freeland
I’m excited about him. He has one of the highest PERs in the ACB.
I agree with AK that, regardless of their cap hit, Dallas will resign Bass to around a mid-level deal. Cuban loves him.
Q: Is Greg favoring his knee?
Frye: He favors dunking on your head, that's what he favors.
by KP Corleone on May 1, 2009 3:19 PM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
Does that mean that Bass WANTS to resign with Dallas?
Seriously, does Bass think he is going to have a better chance at winning a title in Dallas or in Portland? This does and will always play a role with free agents. It is sometimes not as big a deal with players who are 24 versus players who are older and realize that everyone in the game gets money… not everyone wins rings.
I strongly believe that many free agents over the next three years will look at Portland and see:
a.) a legitimate Championship contender roster to play with
b.) a state-of-the-art arena to play in
c.) one of the wealthiest owners in hoops to play for
d.) the BEST crowd/fans in the NBA to watch them every night
e.) a place that has a culture that is respected in and outside of sports
Portland is probably RISING on a lot of free agents “wish lists”…
by Portland Dynasty on May 1, 2009 4:45 PM PDT up reply actions
Not all players are about the rings
he may be about the money.
I got 6 years of playoff blue balls going on, and I'm ready to release. GO BLAZERS. ~Mortimer
by Philthyanimal on May 1, 2009 5:13 PM PDT up reply actions
Joel Freeland will come over and take Shavlik Randolph's spot on the roster, which is fine by me.
Regardless of whether or not Freeland is ready to immediately produce, it’ll be good just to bring him over to the U.S. and get him on the roster.
I think Freeland would be a good fit
And if I remember right[always a ?] he was a very late first round pick thus cheap for years
by southern oregon on May 1, 2009 3:24 PM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
Buck Williams
was only 6’8" also. :)
The more you talk about this guy, the more I like this option. He’s affordable, young, and brings a lot of things this team could benefit from to the table.
1, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13, 21... I know...
by FibonacciSequence on May 1, 2009 5:09 PM PDT up reply actions
Guy whose name isn't mentioned too often
but I would love to have on the Blazers (even if I hate his guts as an opponent) is Anderson Varejao. He has an ETO this offseason, and based on how the last negotiation went, I can’t imagine him and his agent are too enamored with Danny Ferry these days. It’d probably take the entirety of our cap space to sign him, but I can think of much worse guys to have on the bench.
Plus, he’s incredibly viable as a center fill-in if the whole foul trouble debacles continue or (God forbid) Joel has to be included in a package for a PG.
He would be good, though I think he also wants a bigger role. He would be interesting should (God forbid) Joel really gets traded as you said
Congrats to Houston. Beat LA!
Going forward Blazers have 5 draft picks, and Rockets have none :)
For the Cleveland Cavaliers and Anderson Varejao, it'd be in both parites' best interests for him to ...
exercise his player option — which is technically different than an early termination option, although that’s splitting hairs — since he’s a pivotal part of the team who’s fairly compensated.
Lastly, I believe Joel Przybilla should be deemed untouchable in any and all trade discussions.
Obviously it would be best for Cleveland
but if Andy could get more from us, then it’s not in his best interest to not exercise his PO (just saw that it was ETO/PO, too lazy to look up which exactly). Obviously this would require us making some surreptitious calls dropping hints to Brazilian agents, but worse violations of the CBA have happened. Plus, he’s been pretty vocal about wanting a long term deal, hence the holdout a couple years back, so since Cleveland is trying to save all their cap space to make a run at a 2nd star for Lebron in 2010, they’d probably still be unwilling to offer him that, whereas we’d have no such issue.
You of all people with your love of backup centers I figured would be on board with this idea. Having Varejao as our backup PF/emergency center fill-in would be FAR superior to pulling someone like Rasho off the scrap heap.
The problem with Anderson Varejao is he'd be more expensive and I just can't envision how ...
Portland would find the wiggle room to obtain him. I guess Varejao could be had for the mid-level exception, but the Cleveland Cavaliers would be able to sign him for more than that amount. At the backup power forward spot, my preference is for the Trail Blazers to find its solution there through the 2009 NBA Draft.
Yep
Dujuan Blair is where it’s at.
The cap space needs to be leveraged to consolidate talent at the SF and/or PG positions. Right now the Blazers essentially have three back up PGs and three back up SFs.
Q: Is Greg favoring his knee?
Frye: He favors dunking on your head, that's what he favors.
agreed until we know what Oden can bring.
I got 6 years of playoff blue balls going on, and I'm ready to release. GO BLAZERS. ~Mortimer
by Philthyanimal on May 1, 2009 5:15 PM PDT up reply actions
Chris Wilcox, Drew Gooden, and Brandon Bass are all poor defenders, albeit for mostly different reasons.
In Bass’ case, he’s just too slow laterally, barely over 6’7" in shoes, and has an average standing reach of 8’10.5" for someone his size.
My other problem with Bass is that he’s not a banger — such as Paul Millsap, even though he’s pretty much unavailable this off-season — but rather a mid-range jumper shooter. In fact, 59% of his field-goal attempts on the season were jump shots.
http://www.82games.com/0809/08DAL13.HTM
Now, with regards to Gooden and Wilcox, those are probably two of the laziest post defenders in the entire NBA. I’ve already dealt with Wilcox as a fan during his tenure with the Seattle SuperSonics, which is I don’t want to deal with another time. As y’all probably assumed, I was a heavy Nick Collison supporter back then.
Bass is not laterally slow. He had a better lane agility time than Mike Conley, Derrick Rose, Greg Oden, Paul Millsap. DraftExpress even attests him “great lateral quickness for his size” in his current profile which I think is too much praise but he is quick enough to not commit a ton of fouls. I like that he has a mid-range shot, but he plays much closer to the basket than Frye.
Congrats to Houston. Beat LA!
Going forward Blazers have 5 draft picks, and Rockets have none :)
AK1984... are you a PRO scout?
you sure talk like it.
Really? Brandon Bass ISN’t a Banger? Really? That is funny, because I was under the impression that he defined the role.
I, too, have seen Wilcox and Gooden chillin in the paint with their Snuggie’s on and feet up in the recliner just letting fools drop buckets on ’em… Oh, wait… that is sarcasm.
Honestly, Laziness isn’t rampant in the NBA. Let alone a realistic description of many, if any, NBA players efforts for defense, training, rehabing or whatever… I just think calling a pro athlete Lazy is just coming too weak and makes you sound like you don’t know anything about hoops or life for that matter.
by Portland Dynasty on May 1, 2009 4:52 PM PDT up reply actions
Brandon Bass can bang down in the paint, but he doesn't do it to the same extent as Paul Millsap.
Brandon Bass: 44.5% eFG% on jump shots (59% of field-goal attempts) & 56.9% iFG% on close-range shots (41% of field-goal attempts).
http://www.82games.com/0809/08DAL13.HTM
Paul Millsap: 36.1% eFG% on jump shots (37% of field-goal attempts) 63.4% iFG% on close-range shots (63% of field-goal attempts).
http://www.82games.com/0809/08UTA10.HTM
Brandon Bass: 9.5% Offensive Rebound Percentage, 17.2% Defensive Rebounding Percentage, & 13.4% Total Rebounding Percentage.
http://www.basketball-reference.com/players/b/bassbr01.html
Paul Millsap: 13.1% Offensive Rebound Percentage, 21.0% Defensive Rebounding Percentage, & 17.0% Total Rebounding Percentage.
http://www.basketball-reference.com/players/m/millspa01.html
All things considered, Bass and Millsap are entirely different types of players. Nonetheless, I expect Bass and Millsap to re-sign with their respective teams this off-season.
Joel is untouchable
until at least a month before the trade deadline. If we see 2 months of greatness from GO, maybe we relax on the 2nd center in order to beef up our pg position
"B-Roy is the best shooting guard I have played against"
-Ron Artest
If Artest can say it, so can I. Broy>Kobe.
Joel will be with Portland until he is 34...
I can’t see Portland wanting to or needing to get rid of Pryzbilla until he is ready to retire. Even IF Oden is killer next season or the season after… IF this Portland team is to be built for playoff battles enough to win championships, we need the double 7’0’er effect and Joel is perfect to play now and back-up later. Plus he is really a fan favorite and the veteran presence that is on the team now.
by Portland Dynasty on May 1, 2009 4:55 PM PDT up reply actions
I, too, agree that Joel Przybilla will be with the Portland Trail Blazers through at least the end of ...
his current contract, which expires after the 2010-2011 season. Y’know, during the 2010 NBA Draft, it wouldn’t surprise me to see Kevin Pritchard target a center (e.g., Cole Aldrich) with the team’s first-round draft pick, since Przybilla could mentor him to be the ballclub’s backup center of the future.
During this off-season, though, I want the Portland Trail Blazers to contact Robert Swift and inquire as to whether or not he’d be down with joining the team in summer league. Swift would also earn a spot on the twenty-man training camp roster, as well as a decent opportunity at making the 15-man regular season roster as the team’s third-string center. Basically, Swift would receieve the Shavlik Randolph treatment.
I am really surprised this has not been mentioned
Tyler Hansbrough. He is one of the most intense players in college basketball history & brings a similar game that Joel Przybilla brings, defense & rebounding.
the only problem is... he's undersized, has poor pace-adjusted rebounding numbers and should virtually no improvement from his Frosh year to his Senior Year
I understand that
Isn’t Maxiell undersized?
The amount of minutes he would receive here are perfect.
by TheGreatDane17 on May 1, 2009 3:33 PM PDT up reply actions
While the likes of Maxiell, Kevin Love and Paul Millsap are execellent rebounders despite being undersized...
… all of them had vastly superior rebound numbers to Hansbrough. Remember that UNC plays at the fastest pace in the nation so there are lots of chances for rebounds. Hansbrough does not compare to these players as a prospect.
Tyler Hansbrough isn't at all similar to Joel Przybilla on offense, defense, or on the boards.
As it is, the closest thing to a power forward version of Przybilla is Jeff Foster of the Indiana Pacers.
This reminds me of the time Timbo hilariously claimed that Jon Brockman — who I’ll miss next season, as the Washington Huskies will have a tough time replacing his lost production with redshirt freshman Tyreese Breshers, incoming freshman Clarence Trent, and JUCO transfer Charles Garcia, Jr. — plays like a shorter version of Przybilla, even though that’s a complete falsehood. If Brockman was a 7-footer, then he’d be similar to Aaron Gray in the NBA.
I have only seen Hansbrough and Blair play a couple of times
Good players but they would just do a Shav here,Freeland is more NBA ready,with a higher ceiling and cheaper
Every team that has ever had Gooden
has gotten better AFTER he left.
I say either Bass or Jason Maxiell. But thats only if Detroit starts rebuilding.
"Respect everyone, fear no one." -TP
There are other attainable PF's
Ronnie Turiaf, for example, is a great fit. He’s a total team player. He rebounds on both ends and with great outlet passing he runs an excellent fast break. His jump shot is not so hot but from under the basket he can steal a few points. Jeff Foster also does a lot of journeyman work down low but maybe a cut below Turiaf. Either one would have to be willing to play 2nd fiddle behind LMA but I don’t really know how they feel about that. Turiaf is as good as Verajao but he doesn’t have LeBron to make him look good. He would come to us more reasonably than a lot of the guys mentioned.
I know I'm going to get killed for this BUT...
I thnk Birdman would be perfect for us.
Tough-check
makes good with limited minutes- check
good D- check
doesnt want the ball-check
negative
annoying-double check but I still think he’d be perfect
immage a 2nd unit of Przy and Anderson- good luck getting a shot up or a rebound
C*mcast sucks!
Birdman brings great D,
But I think we want to stay away from the off court problem players… Maybe he’s cleaned up his act, but “jail-blazers” comments would be back… This team has been a character driven team as well as a talent driven one, which has been cool to watch… But I’m not necessarily disagreeing with you, Birdman would be an improvement for our team.
Another guy who might be considered Enemy #1 who might be available is Lamar Odom.. What’s his contract situation? He would be an amazing fit for us.. I guess there are some character issues with him as well though.
There goes Brandon Roy, the best there ever was in this game.
by two buck chuck on May 1, 2009 6:49 PM PDT up reply actions
A lot of the veteran FA's this year
Are not going to be happy with what the market is willing pay for their sevices
Those two bring different things
Odom can score and Anderson can defend. Odom is on another level altogether but who knows what baggage those guys have. For sure it’s heavy.
maybe we could add...
david lee-1.7mil, hedo turkoglu-6.8mil, charlie villanueva-3.4mil, grant hill-1.9mil, matt barnes-797k, louis amundson-797k, stromile swift-201k, paul millsap- 797k.
Antonio McDyess and Joel Freeland.
Effortless solutions for KP.
Joel is contract ready and Antonio wants a ring.
There isn’t much of a market for 34 year old PF/Cs even if they are outstanding citizens and selfless players.
I think the two give us all we need to compliment our three main bigs.
Bedge or go home.
by Ojala John on May 1, 2009 8:32 PM PDT reply actions 1 recs
Brandon Bass please
Dude hustles like crazy
Always givin 110% when I see him
The NBA: Where Amazingly Bad Officiating Happens.
Tyler Hansbrough
"The brownies,'' Fernandez said after the game. "The brownies are good for me to make three-points.''
I'm starting to warm to the idea of drafting Hansbrough if he's available...
but I do have a sneaking suspicion we’ll move up in the draft via trade.. Question: Would Hansbrough be an upgrade to the Channing Frye role?
There goes Brandon Roy, the best there ever was in this game.
by two buck chuck on May 1, 2009 10:51 PM PDT up reply actions
Yes
"The brownies,'' Fernandez said after the game. "The brownies are good for me to make three-points.''
by Sabonis4Ever on May 1, 2009 11:35 PM PDT up reply actions
To Ruffin
Congrats to Houston. Beat LA!
Going forward Blazers have 5 draft picks, and Rockets have none :)
We could Prob get Jordan Hill
fairly easily. Teams may trade out rather than pay top 5 pick money for him.
Come on you gotta listen unto me,
lay off that whiskey and let that cocaine be. ~Johnny Cash
Anyone else thinking
that any backup PF this team signs, needs to be able to score down low, not just bang and rebound? Unless Greg stays on the 2nd team next year, (not likely) Joel will be on the bench unit to bang and rebound, so any back up PF would need to be more of the Milsap role, than the Brandon Bass or Birdman role.
Why is no one mentioning Antonio McDyess?
I know less than half of you half as well as I should like, and I like less than half of you half as well as you deserve.
You clearly
didn’t read the comments section. Several people mention McDyess who I might add I’d love to see in a Blazers Uni.
"Death is not final," Gita says. "If any man thinks that he slays, and if another thinks that he is slain, neither knows the truth. The Eternal in man cannot kill: the Eternal in man cannot die. The soul in man is neither born nor does it die. Weapons cannot cut it; fire cannot burn it; water cannot drown it.
The Bhagavad Gita
If McDyess could be obtained for midlevel (or lower) dollars, he’d be worth every penny IMO.
MLB2PDX!!! (someday...)
by The Cactus Leaguer on May 2, 2009 8:52 PM PDT up reply actions
Resigning Fyre
Could someone (perhaps Storyteller or Dave) answer this question. Is it possible to resign Frye by first renouncing him and bird-rights thus making him an unrestricted free agent. Then Portland signing him to a deal that does not have all the strings that the unrestricted free agent contract has such as making a minimum qualifying offer, and a long window of time with cap hold space of 300% times current salary?
I like Frye. I know he had a down year but even in a down year whild playing the third string PF position he was arguably the best 3rd-string PF in the league and better than a lot of 2nd string PFs. I think he just had a down start to the year followed by no playing time but we did see flashes of the better player Frye can be near the end of the season. Given the down year, he proaably is not worth the qualifying offer and players certainly won’t want to clog up their cap space but if could renounce the bird rights and thus the qualifying offer and simply sign up to a light weight contract, I don’t think we can find a better third string power forward who can deal with being a third string.
That said, Freeland seems to have had a good year in Europe. Anyone think he is better than Frye already?
By renouncing his rights we would lose the ability to go over the cap to sign him
So we would need to have cap space (or an exception) left at the end of our wheeling and dealing to re-sign him. We would also lose the ability to match offers. It would make it more likely that he signs elsewhere, which I think he will do anyway to get more playing time.
Freeland is good and more explosive than Frye while having about the same body frame, but I don’t think he is better as an all-around player. Rawer.

by 































