OT: A better realignment proposal/schedule change/playoff format
Currently the divisions mean nothing at all, and winning one is pointless as it doesn't guarantee anything. Not to mention the obvious hangups of POR, OKC, and Minnesota being in the same division, and NO being in the west.
By changing to two large divisions winning one would be very significant, and it should get a large reward. I think a bye in the first round of the playoffs would really help the league as it could trim playoff teams to 12, and fans of each team would really think they had a shot.
The playoff's are so overblown right now everyone (nationally) is bored by the time they're half-way done. If the top four teams don't play in the first round there will be some holdover anticipation, and all the teams that face them will have won a series first (making their fans confident), this would add tremendously to the drama.
While we're at it the season's way too long now to hold national interest, and has so many games it really takes a toll on injuries, energy levels to teams, and really messes foreign players up. Too many stars take tames off, and with the rise in foreign popularity many players are playing in the offseason (which is good for global interest).
Realistically a number of things can be done to correct these problems that generally contribute to a lot of teams/players taking games lightly and playoff series being blowouts.
In entertainment the concept of "leave the people wanting more" is a big deal, and realistically the league should trim its playoffs, total # of games in regular season, exhibition games to increase the importance of each game and reduce injuries, WHILE making the divisions more regional to encourage rivalry AND reward division winners to make it meaningful.
Here are the solutions:
New Divisions:
WESTERN CONFERENCE
Pacific:
Portland, Sacramento, Oakland, LA (X2), Phoenix, and Utah.
Mid-West:
Denver, Minnesota, Milwaukee, Chicago, Oklahoma City, Dallas, San Antonio, Houston
EASTERN CONFERENCE
Northeast:
Indiana, Detroit, Cleveland, Toronto, Boston, New Jersey, New York, Philadelphia
Southeast:
Washington, Charlotte, Memphis, Atlanta, New Orleans, Orlando, Miami
SCHEDULE:
preseason:
They're not televised usually, not that interesting, and cost the same amount, not good business strategy.
Have only two pre-season games at the end of training camp (one home, one away) after which teams can make cuts.
Afterwards have each team spend a full week in Europe/Asia having each team play an exhibition game against a foreign team. Add a 100K incentive for each player to play to help entice stars to play in the games and create more foreign interest.
Teams then could spend one more week at home practicing before the regular season begins.
games player: 4
games reduced 2-3
regular season:
According to the new divisional realignment have each team play every team w/in their division 4X (teams in divisions with 8 teams play three times 3 times, alternating yearly), for a grand total of 28 divisional games that are meaningful, helping to create better regional rivalries.
Out of division teams play each other 2X a year (one home, one away) for a total of 44 games.
Total Games : 72
Games Reduced: 10
Not a big hit as far as owners attendance is concerned, more regional associations, and by the end of the season fans are not attending the games of losing teams. This helps to shorten the season a considerable amount and with the games saved all back to backs can be eliminated along with trimming off a week and a half of the season. It also adds to the importance of games, meaning less players taking games off. In addition, TV coverage wouldn't have to be cut at all, which is a large source of the league's revenue.
Playoffs:
Right now the playoff structure is a joke with far too many teams (w/no chance) making the playoffs, and the games themselves dragging on forever, boring the common fan. By giving the division winners a bye there will be a sense of anticipation for the second round of the playoffs, by eliminating two teams from the playoffs, they will be more of an honor to be at and there won't be any blowout series in the first round (3-6, 4-5 in each conference). AND a strong incentive is given to winning the division, adding to the pre-playoff drama instead of things mostly winding to a lull. The first round would have to be a five game series in order to not tire teams out too much, and again, playoff coverage in the playoffs wouldn't be cut at all, just more time given in the first round to the 3-6/4-5 matchups so that there were never more than four series going at one time.
These moves would not sacrifice national coverage whatsoever while allowing the players more rest during the year to ensure a high level of play (13 less games a year), giving stronger incentive to win regular season games, making regional rivalries more significant, and making the playoffs overall more competitive.
5 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
playoff spots
i remember making a comment about this last year…but i’d think it’d be cool if the 9th place team in one conference could take the spot of the 8th place team in the other conference if the 9th place team has a higher win%. in my scenario GS would have taken atlanta’s spot in the east…this year phx would take detroits spot….once the 8 teams are determined then they seed based on record.
phx would be 5th in the east right now based on win%.
when weak teams in the east are making the playoffs it only hurts their future because they can’t be in the draft lotto to build for the future when they should be there. good teams +.500 don’t really deserve to be in the lottery.
i know this all sounds confusing and it all has flaws, but it’d be fun to see a new playoff format. hell even the D league format would be a nice change.
The most hated Blazer is like the least hottest supermodel - Sabonis4Ever
that's just putting a bandaid on it.
then you run into problem scenarios with the 9th seed playing against a potentially weaker 1st seed than the 8th seed ends up playing.
really, its part of the bigger solution that we all know is best competitively and in fairness’ sake: Just taking the top 16 teams (throw in division winners if you must for rivalries sake).
With the playoffs spaced the way they are now for TV’s sake, you can travel rest and play so that they have to fly a long ways in the playoffs excuse doesn’t fly.
The biggest flaw I see with that plan is strength of schedule. The west plays a far harder schedule than the east, so their wins are harder to come by. If you then take the regular season, shorten it, and play equal games vs non division, & more vs division it could work..who knows..
Please, for the love of all that is holy, please stop using the following: "Book it.", "FTW", "Epic" & "Fail".
...no seriously--stop.
*correction*
GS would have been in the eastern bracket last year and atlanta would have dropped out.
The most hated Blazer is like the least hottest supermodel - Sabonis4Ever
you're always gonna have 1 or 2
that are in tough spots, however it makes more sense for Memphis to be grouped in that SE division to balance things out than it does to add Houston to it or a team north of DC.
And does having Minnesota by itself in the Western Conference right now make any sense? How about having New Orleans in the west? That’s a real quick trip for Portland for sure.
by darkhelmit54 on Apr 8, 2009 10:12 PM PDT up reply actions

by 






















