"Taking Care of Business" - 4/6 UPDATE (Keep Hope Alive edition)
|
CURRENT STANDINGS: |
|
| 2. DENVER | 52-26 |
| 3. SAN ANTONIO | 49-27 |
| 4. HOUSTON | 49-28 |
| 5. PORTLAND | 48-28 |
| 6. NEW ORLEANS | 47-29 |
| 7. UTAH | 46-31 |
| 8. DALLAS | 45-31 |
|
OUT: PHOENIX |
42-35 |
|
* * * PROJECTED FINAL STANDINGS: |
|
| 2. SAN ANTONIO | 55-27 |
| 3. DENVER | 54-28 |
| 4. HOUSTON (tiebreak v POR) | 53-29 |
| 5. PORTLAND | 53-29 |
| 6. DALLAS | 50-32 |
| 7. NEW ORLEANS | 49-33 |
| 8. UTAH | 48-34 |
|
OUT: PHOENIX |
46-36 |
SO FAR SO GOOD
It is still possible to take homecourt advantage away from the Rockets and/or San Antonio with a win vs. San Antonio. Just handle your business boys, and the future looks rosy (especially if Popp rests some starters!!!)
Here's how the possibilities shake out with Portland win vs. San Antonio:
|
PROJECTED FINAL STANDINGS if Portland beats San Antonio, all else holds steady: |
|
| 2. DENVER (tiebreaker v. SA/POR) | 54-28 |
| 3. SAN ANTONIO (division winner) | 54-28 |
| 4. PORTLAND | 54-28 |
| 5. HOUSTON | 53-29 |
| 6. DALLAS | 50-32 |
| 7. NEW ORLEANS | 49-33 |
| 8. UTAH | 48-34 |
|
OUT: PHOENIX |
46-36 |
|
PROJECTED FINAL STANDINGS if Portland beats San Antonio, San Antonio drops an OTHER game somewhere, and all else holds steady: |
|
| 2. DENVER (tiebreaker v. POR) | 54-28 |
| 3. PORTLAND | 54-28 |
| 4. SAN ANTONIO (division winner) | 53-29 |
| 5. HOUSTON | 53-29 |
| 6. DALLAS | 50-32 |
| 7. NEW ORLEANS | 49-33 |
| 8. UTAH | 48-34 |
|
OUT: PHOENIX |
46-36 |
|
PROJECTED FINAL STANDINGS if Portland beats San Antonio, San Antonio drops an OTHER game somewhere, and Houston wins out, too: |
|
| 2. DENVER (tiebreaker v. POR) | 54-28 |
| 3. HOUSTON (division winner) | 54-28 |
| 4. PORTLAND | 54-28 |
| 5. SAN ANTONIO | 53-29 |
| 6. DALLAS | 50-32 |
| 7. NEW ORLEANS | 49-33 |
| 8. UTAH | 48-34 |
|
OUT: PHOENIX |
46-36 |
|
PROJECTED FINAL STANDINGS if Portland beats San Antonio, loses one OTHER game, all else holds steady: |
|
| 2. DENVER (tiebreaker v. SA) | 54-28 |
| 3. SAN ANTONIO (division winner) | 54-28 |
| 4. HOUSTON (tiebreaker v. POR) | 53-29 |
| 5. PORTLAND | 53-29 |
| 6. DALLAS | 50-32 |
| 7. NEW ORLEANS | 49-33 |
| 8. UTAH | 48-34 |
|
OUT: PHOENIX |
46-36 |
|
PROJECTED FINAL STANDINGS if Portland beats San Antonio, loses one OTHER game, and San Antonio also drops an OTHER game somewhere: |
|
| 2. DENVER | 54-28 |
| 3. SAN ANTONIO (TB over HOU) | 53-29 |
| 4. HOUSTON (tiebreaker over POR) | 53-29 |
| 5. PORTLAND | 53-29 |
| 6. DALLAS | 50-32 |
| 7. NEW ORLEANS | 49-33 |
| 8. UTAH | 48-34 |
|
OUT: PHOENIX |
46-36 |
|
PROJECTED FINAL STANDINGS if Portland beats San Antonio, loses one OTHER game, and San Antonio drops two OTHER game somewhere (plausible with the emotional blow of MANU out for the season?): |
|
| 2. DENVER | 54-28 |
| 3. HOUSTON (division winner) | 53-29 |
| 4. PORTLAND | 53-29 |
| 5. SAN ANTONIO | 52-30 |
| 6. DALLAS | 50-32 |
| 7. NEW ORLEANS | 49-33 |
| 8. UTAH | 48-34 |
|
OUT: PHOENIX |
46-36 |
Here's how the possibilities shake out with Portland loss vs. San Antonio:
(for Portland loss, all other expected results (see above)
|
PROJECTED FINAL STANDINGS if Portland falls to San Antonio, San Antonio drops an OTHER game somewhere, and all else holds steady: |
|
| 2. DENVER (tiebreaker v. SA) | 54-28 |
| 3. SAN ANTONIO | 54-28 |
| 4. HOUSTON (tiebreaker v. POR) | 53-29 |
| 5. PORTLAND | 53-29 |
| 6. DALLAS | 50-32 |
| 7. NEW ORLEANS | 49-33 |
| 8. UTAH | 48-34 |
|
OUT: PHOENIX |
46-36 |
|
PROJECTED FINAL STANDINGS if Portland falls to San Antonio, San Antonio drops an OTHER game somewhere, and Houston loses an unexpected game: |
|
| 2. DENVER (tiebreaker v. SA) | 54-28 |
| 3. SAN ANTONIO | 54-28 |
| 4. PORTLAND | 53-29 |
| 5. HOUSTON | 52-30 |
| 6. DALLAS | 50-32 |
| 7. NEW ORLEANS | 49-33 |
| 8. UTAH | 48-34 |
|
OUT: PHOENIX |
46-36 |
|
PROJECTED FINAL STANDINGS if Portland falls to San Antonio, San Antonio drops an OTHER game somewhere, and Houston wins out, too: |
|
| 2. DENVER (tiebreaker v. SA) | 54-28 |
| 3. SAN ANTONIO (wins TB v. HOU) | 54-28 |
| 4. HOUSTON | 54-28 |
| 5. PORTLAND | 53-29 |
| 6. DALLAS | 50-32 |
| 7. NEW ORLEANS | 49-33 |
| 8. UTAH | 48-34 |
|
OUT: PHOENIX |
46-36 |
|
PROJECTED FINAL STANDINGS if Portland falls to San Antonio, but wins out, and San Antonio drops two OTHER games somewhere (plausible with the emotional blow of MANU out for the season?): |
|
| 2. DENVER | 54-28 |
| 3. SAN ANTONIO (wins TB v. HOU) | 53-29 |
| 4. HOUSTON (wins TB v. POR) | 53-29 |
| 5. PORTLAND | 53-29 |
| 6. DALLAS | 50-32 |
| 7. NEW ORLEANS | 49-33 |
| 8. UTAH | 48-34 |
|
OUT: PHOENIX |
46-36 |
|
PROJECTED FINAL STANDINGS if Portland falls to San Antonio, loses one OTHER game, and San Antonio drops two OTHER games somewhere (plausible with the emotional blow of MANU out for the season?): |
|
| 2. DENVER | 54-28 |
| 3. SAN ANTONIO (division winner) | 53-29 |
| 4. HOUSTON | 53-29 |
| 5. PORTLAND | 52-30 |
| 6. DALLAS | 50-32 |
| 7. NEW ORLEANS | 49-33 |
| 8. UTAH | 48-34 |
|
OUT: PHOENIX |
46-36 |
|
PROJECTED FINAL STANDINGS if Portland falls to San Antonio, but wins out, and San Antonio drops THREE OTHER games somewhere (somewhat difficult to imagine, even WITH the emotional blow of MANU out for the season?): |
|
| 2. DENVER | 54-28 |
| 3. HOUSTON | 53-29 |
| 4. SAN ANTONIO (TB v. POR) | 52-30 |
| 5. PORTLAND | 52-30 |
| 6. DALLAS | 50-32 |
| 7. NEW ORLEANS | 49-33 |
| 8. UTAH | 48-34 |
|
OUT: PHOENIX |
46-36 |
In other words, it's hard to imagine a scenario where Portland loses to SA, thus moving two losses behind them, and losing a tiebreaker, and still ends up anywhere other than the 5 seed. Even if San Antonio were to lose THREE games to other teams, and I just don't see that happening if they beat Portland, they would still have the tiebreaker over Portland for the 4 seed.
Given a loss to SA, the most plausible scenario that has Portland in the 4 seed is if Portland wins out and Houston loses TWO games, including one currently not projected for them, or Portland drops SA plus one, and Houston drops three games, including TWO not currently expected. But, of course, in either of those last two scenarios, we have to face Houston in the first round. Only winning in SA likely gets us anyone other than Houston in a matchup where we have homecourt advnatage.
RESULTS:
Portland, falls, but New Orleans drops an unexpected game, which is the best thing that happened this weekend, besides Portland clinching, which we knew they would anyway. Portland can still move past Houston and secure Homecourt with a win vs. San Antonio and everything else holding form.
KEY REMAINING GAMES WHERE UNEXPECTED RESULTS COULD HELP THE BLAZERS LISTED BELOW
As I was responding to a post below, I realized that bolding key games where we DON'T WANT THE EXPECTED "TAKING CARE OF BUSINESS" TO HAPPEN might give us more games of interest, so I have bolded games for each team in the hunt where rooting for a "non-traditional" outcome should help the Blazers:
SAN ANTONIO
(current: 49-27) (projected: 55-27)
(2 seed)
- Tue, Apr 7 at Oklahoma City W (lost to OKC already AT HOME)
- Wed, Apr 8 Portland W (lost TWICE to POR already, b2b for both teams, but Portland has a better record in those games and Popp might just help us out and rest guys)
- Fri, Apr 10 Utah W
- Sun, Apr 12 at Sacramento W
- Mon, Apr 13 at Golden State W (2d of back to back)
- Wed, Apr 15 New Orleans W
DENVER
(current: 52-26) (projected: 54-28)
(3 seed)
- Wed, Apr 8 Oklahoma City W
- Thu, Apr 9 at LA Lakers L
- Mon, Apr 13 Sacramento W
- Wed, Apr 15 at Portland L
HOUSTON
(current: 49-28) (projected: 53-29)
(wins tiebreaker with POR, earning the 4 seed)
- Tue, Apr 7 Orlando W (not sure why, except Orlando is good)
- Thu, Apr 9 at Sacramento W
- Fri, Apr 10 at Golden State W (2d of back to back)
- Mon, Apr 13 New Orleans W (lost to them once already)
- Wed, Apr 15 at Dallas L
PORTLAND
(current: 48-28) (projected: 53-29)
(loses tiebreaker to HOU, meaning a likely 5 seed)
- Tue, Apr 7 at Memphis W
- Wed, Apr 8 at San Antonio L (beat them TWICE already, b2b for both teams, but Portland has a better ercord in those games and Popp might just help us out and rest guys)
- Fri, Apr 10 LA Lakers W
- Sat, Apr 11 at LA Clippers W
- Mon, Apr 13 Oklahoma City W
- Wed, Apr 15 Denver W
DALLAS
(current: 46-31) (projected: 50-32)
(6 seed)
- Wed, Apr 8 Utah W (lost to them TWICE already)
- Fri, Apr 10 New Orleans W (lost to them TWICE already)
- Sun, Apr 12 at New Orleans L
- Mon, Apr 13 Minnesota W (2d of back-to-back)
- Wed, Apr 15 Houston W
NEW ORLEANS
(current: 47-29) (projected: 49-33)
(7 seed)
- Tue, Apr 7 at Miami L
- Wed, Apr 8 Phoenix W (2d of back-to-back)
- Fri, Apr 10 at Dallas L (beat them TWICE already)
- Sun, Apr 12 Dallas W
- Mon, Apr 13 at Houston L
- Wed, Apr 15 at San Antonio L (possible W if Spurs rest guys?)
UTAH
(current: 47-30) (projected: 49-33)
(8 seed)
- Wed, Apr 8 at Dallas L (beat them TWICE already)
- Fri, Apr 10 at San Antonio L
- Sat, Apr 11 Golden State W (2d of back-to-back)
- Mon, Apr 13 LA Clippers W
- Tue, Apr 14 at LA Lakers L (possible W if Lakers rest guys?)
PHOENIX
(current: 42-35) (projected: 46-36)
(OUT)
- Wed, Apr 8 at New Orleans L (2d of back-to-back for NO)
- Fri, Apr 10 at Memphis W
- Sat, Apr 11 at Minnesota W (2d of back-to-back)
- Mon, Apr 13 Memphis W
- Wed, Apr 15 Golden State W
Recent events and the upcoming schedule have really pushed Utah, Dallas and NO into a tier behind Houston and Portland. Phoenix is just a spoiler at this point, unless Dallas or Utah continues to falter and Phoenix wins out.
What that means is, we continue to hope for those teams to get wins against Houston, San Antonio or Denver to help us out, but other than that, it really becomes Portland taking care of ITS business to earn homecourt...beat San Antonio, and you really turn the race around, because you have the tiebreaker, so it's really a FOUR game swing depending on whether we win at San Antonio. How so? If we win, we get a tiebreaker on them, plus a game gained in the standings. If we lose, we fall a game behind in the standings and lose the tiebreaker, too. So, it's the difference between being TWO up or TWO down...no pressure though, Portland, no pressure.
Putting that aside, we can still:
BEAT SAN ANTONIO!!!
Of Course, God helps those who help themselves, so the best thing Portland could do for itself would be to steal one of the Texas games, and hold serve on the other "should wins," as Portland would gain a game on San Antonio with a win, and would earn the tiebreaker based on the head-to head records if Houston passes San Antonio and wins the division.
ROOT FOR ADDED LOSSES FOR DENVER, HOUSTON OR SAN ANTONIO IN BOLDED GAMES ABOVE, AND/OR PRAY FOR MORE LIGHTNING TO STRIKE THE TEAMS ABOVE US WITH UPSET LOSSES.
BOTTOM LINE:
What we as Blazers fans should be rooting for (and that's really the question here, right?) in any game between playoff contenders in the West is that the third tier guys (or spoiler Phoenix) win a couple against the first tier guys, specifically, San Antonio, Denver, and Houston. Other than that, everything going to plan means we get a four or five seed, and us beating San Antonio likely gives us homecourt in the first Round.
All clear now?
6 recs |
13 comments
Comments
Last week vs This week
Last week was looking ahead to playing Houston for the #4 seed. Turns out that game was for the #3 seed.
This week it’s SA for the #4 seed. The outcome would be nice though. I’d rather play SA with homecourt than Houston.
by keepfryealive on Apr 6, 2009 9:37 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Beating SA doesn't push them below Houston unfortunately
Looking very likely we get Houston, whether we beat SA or not.
And if we beat SA, then we still need Houston to beat Dallas and catch or pass San Antonio, so the tiebreaker with San Antonio means something for Portland.
Kermit on the inbounds play, inbounds....BATES at the horn, HE SCORES!! HE SCORES!!!! And they are all over Billy Ray Bates! My, oh my!!!
by blazer91 on Apr 6, 2009 9:41 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
San Antonio has some tough wins though
And they’ve been playing like crap lately. The OKC road game and Portland, Utah, NO homes games are no gimmies. Even the GS home game on a back to back isn’t a gimme, considering how Spurs have been playing those. I’d be relatively amazed if the Spurs went any better than 4-2 in their final 6.
by Zaig on Apr 6, 2009 10:24 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
If Spurs go 4-2
They finish with 53 wins, which is behind Portland, unless we lose one more game somewhere. If we do lose one more game somewhere (other than in SA), we finish with 53 wins, and tied with SA, which only helps us if they DON’T win their division
For the Spurs to have 53 wins and NOT win their division, Houston must WIN OUT.
So, if Portland wins out, and SA and Houston each drop one more game, Portland gets the 3 seed. If Portland wins out and Houston wins out, we still need the Spurs to drop a game for us to keep the 4 seed.
Or, if Portland drops a game, we need SA to drop one more game or have Houston win out to keep the four seed, or have Houston drop TWO more games and SA drop one to earn the 3 seed.
Kermit on the inbounds play, inbounds....BATES at the horn, HE SCORES!! HE SCORES!!!! And they are all over Billy Ray Bates! My, oh my!!!
by blazer91 on Apr 6, 2009 11:54 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
We're 1 game back of SA
A win there evens it up and PTB own the tiebreaker. We want Houston to win so they take the divison and the #3 seed. Then we tie SA, have the tiebreaker and a 4 vs 5 with homecourt against SA.
Houston has some serious D. I bet they take #3 and hopefully we tie with SA.
by keepfryealive on Apr 6, 2009 10:46 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
And based on my calculations, Houston loses the tiebreaker to SA
so even a three way tie doesn’t help us, as San Antonio wins their divison via tiebreaker and Houston still beats us via a tiebreaker.
So we actually DON’T want Houston to win vs. Dallas, because it costs us homecourt advantage.
(Unless my calculations are off)
Kermit on the inbounds play, inbounds....BATES at the horn, HE SCORES!! HE SCORES!!!! And they are all over Billy Ray Bates! My, oh my!!!
by blazer91 on Apr 6, 2009 9:44 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Portland could easily lose 3
SA, LA, Denver – where does 3 & 3 put us?
by The Thinker on Apr 6, 2009 9:44 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Gives us 31 losses
which still projects one ahead of the next best team, unless something else goes hinky.
Kermit on the inbounds play, inbounds....BATES at the horn, HE SCORES!! HE SCORES!!!! And they are all over Billy Ray Bates! My, oh my!!!
by blazer91 on Apr 6, 2009 9:45 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
if the rest of the standings play out the same
Portland would be 5th, as Dallas is “scheduled” to lose 32 games.
by usmcr3049 on Apr 6, 2009 10:01 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
It is a small thing
but your current standings are off, Houston is currently 4th, at 49-28, and the Blazers are 5th and 48-28.
by usmcr3049 on Apr 6, 2009 10:00 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
thanks. fixed, as painful as it was to move Portland down again.
Kermit on the inbounds play, inbounds....BATES at the horn, HE SCORES!! HE SCORES!!!! And they are all over Billy Ray Bates! My, oh my!!!
by blazer91 on Apr 6, 2009 10:09 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Thanks amigo
LMA: 35 points, 18 rebounds against "OKC." Beaste!
by prezofdeath on Apr 6, 2009 10:25 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Blazers need to win out now.
It’s that simple, really.
Pontiff of the Pryz for Prez Posse...
by timbo on Apr 7, 2009 7:49 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs

by 





















