"Taking Care of Business" - 4/3 UPDATE (Breathing room is good edition)
|
CURRENT STANDINGS: |
|
| 2. DENVER | 50-26 |
| 3. SAN ANTONIO | 49-26 |
| 4. PORTLAND | 48-27 |
| 5. HOUSTON | 48-28 |
| 6. NEW ORLEANS | 47-28 |
| 7. UTAH | 46-30 |
| 8. DALLAS | 45-31 |
|
OUT: PHOENIX |
42-34 |
|
*** PROJECTED FINAL STANDINGS: |
|
| 2. SAN ANTONIO | 55-27 |
| 3. DENVER | 54-28 |
| 4. HOUSTON (tiebreak v POR) | 53-29 |
| 5. PORTLAND | 53-29 |
| 6. NEW ORLEANS (tiebreak v DAL) | 50-32 |
| 7. DALLAS | 50-32 |
| 8. UTAH | 48-34 |
|
OUT: PHOENIX |
46-36 |
SO FAR SO GOOD
Now the stage is set to take homecourt advantage away from the Rockets and/or San Antonio. Just handle your business boys, and the future looks rosy:
Here's how the possibilities shake out with Portland wins in Texas:
|
PROJECTED FINAL STANDINGS if Portland beats Houston and San Antonio, all else holds steady: |
|
| 2. PORTLAND | 55-27 |
| 3. SAN ANTONIO (division winner) | 54-28 |
| 4. DENVER | 54-28 |
| 5. HOUSTON | 52-30 |
| 6. NEW ORLEANS (tiebreak v DAL) | 50-32 |
| 7. DALLAS | 50-32 |
| 8. UTAH | 48-34 |
|
OUT: PHOENIX |
46-36 |
|
PROJECTED FINAL STANDINGS if Portland beats San Antonio, all else holds steady: |
|
| 2. DENVER (tiebreaker v. SA) | 54-28 |
| 3. SAN ANTONIO (division winner) | 54-28 |
| 4. PORTLAND | 54-28 |
| 5. HOUSTON | 53-29 |
| 6. NEW ORLEANS (tiebreak v DAL) | 50-32 |
| 7. DALLAS | 50-32 |
| 8. UTAH | 48-34 |
|
OUT: PHOENIX |
46-36 |
|
PROJECTED FINAL STANDINGS if Portland beats Houston, all else holds steady: |
|
| 2. SAN ANTONIO | 55-27 |
| 3. DENVER (tiebreaker v POR) | 54-28 |
| 4. PORTLAND | 54-28 |
| 5. HOUSTON | 52-30 |
| 6. NEW ORLEANS (tiebreak v DAL) | 50-32 |
| 7. DALLAS | 50-32 |
| 8. UTAH | 48-34 |
|
OUT: PHOENIX |
46-36 |
With those matchups, I'm not sure I WANT to be number two in the West. While it means homecourt in the second round, it also means playing Dallas in the first round, and I dislike that matchup intensely.
RESULTS FROM TONIGHT'S KEY ACTION:
Portland beats OKC (NICE...VERY NICE)
San Antonio beats Indiana (Spurs get expected win)
New Orleans FALLS to Golden State (Upset special comes through)
Houston FALLS to (some team from north of San Diego and South of San Francisco) (Home team handles business)
The Houston game was an expected loss for them. New Orleans helped out and lost its game, as did the true third tier teams, Utah and Dallas. Phoenix stayed alive.
SATURDAY'S KEY ACTION:
Well, Denver plays at LA Clippers, but that only counts as a key game if you think the lightning from tonight could strike twice and hit Denver to morrow. I wouldn't bet on it, but everyone by now knows that's what it owuld take for Portland to catch Denver in the division race...some lightning. Stranger things have happened (tonight even) (TWICE even). Even if the Clippers don't win, wearing out Denver so that they have to play Minnesota with tired legs on the second night of a back-to-back would be helpful. In short, hope for a Clipper win or a quadruple overtime game.
KEY GAMES WHERE UNEXPECTED RESULTS COULD HELP THE BLAZERS LISTED BELOW
As I was responding to a post below, I realized that bolding key games where we DON'T WANT THE EXPECTED "TAKING CARE OF BUSINESS" TO HAPPEN might give us more games of interest, so I have bolded games for each team in the hunt where rooting for a "non-traditional" outcome should help the Blazers:
SAN ANTONIO
(current: 49-26) (projected: 55-27)
(2 seed)
- Sun, Apr 5 at Cleveland L
- Tue, Apr 7 at Oklahoma City W (lost to OKC already AT HOME)
- Wed, Apr 8 Portland W (lost TWICE to POR already, b2b for both teams, but Portland has a better record in those games and Popp might just help us out and rest guys)
- Fri, Apr 10 Utah W
- Sun, Apr 12 at Sacramento W
- Mon, Apr 13 at Golden State W (2d of back to back)
- Wed, Apr 15 New Orleans W
DENVER
(current: 50-26) (projected: 54-28)
(3 seed)
- Sat, Apr 4 LA Clippers W
- Sun, Apr 5 at Minnesota W (2d of back-to-back after long flight from LA)
- Wed, Apr 8 Oklahoma City W
- Thu, Apr 9 at LA Lakers L
- Mon, Apr 13 Sacramento W
- Wed, Apr 15 at Portland L
HOUSTON
(current: 48-28) (projected: 53-29)
(wins tiebreaker with POR, earning the 4 seed)
- Sun, Apr 5 Portland W (lost to them already)
- Tue, Apr 7 Orlando W (not sure why, except Orlando is good)
- Thu, Apr 9 at Sacramento W
- Fri, Apr 10 at Golden State W (2d of back to back)
- Mon, Apr 13 New Orleans W (lost to them once already)
- Wed, Apr 15 at Dallas L
PORTLAND
(current: 48-27) (projected: 53-29)
(loses tiebreaker to HOU, meaning a likely 5 seed)
- Sun, Apr 5 at Houston L (beat them once already)
- Tue, Apr 7 at Memphis W
- Wed, Apr 8 at San Antonio L (beat them TWICE already, b2b for both teams, but Portland has a better ercord in those games and Popp might just help us out and rest guys)
- Fri, Apr 10 LA Lakers W
- Sat, Apr 11 at LA Clippers W
- Mon, Apr 13 Oklahoma City W
- Wed, Apr 15 Denver W
NEW ORLEANS
(current: 47-28) (projected: 50-32)
(wins tiebreaker with DAL, earning a 6 seed)
- Sun, Apr 5 Utah W (lost to them TWICE already)
- Tue, Apr 7 at Miami L
- Wed, Apr 8 Phoenix W (2d of back-to-back)
- Fri, Apr 10 at Dallas L (beat them TWICE already)
- Sun, Apr 12 Dallas W
- Mon, Apr 13 at Houston L
- Wed, Apr 15 at San Antonio L (possible W if Spurs rest guys?)
DALLAS
(current: 45-31) (projected: 50-32)
(loses tiebreaker to NO, earning a 7 seed)
- Sun, Apr 5 Phoenix W (lost to them once already)
- Wed, Apr 8 Utah W (lost to them TWICE already)
- Fri, Apr 10 New Orleans W (lost to them TWICE already)
- Sun, Apr 12 at New Orleans L
- Mon, Apr 13 Minnesota W (2d of back-to-back)
- Wed, Apr 15 Houston W
UTAH
(current: 46-30) (projected: 48-34)
(8 seed)
- Sun, Apr 5 at New Orleans L (beat them TWICE already)
- Wed, Apr 8 at Dallas L (beat them TWICE already)
- Fri, Apr 10 at San Antonio L
- Sat, Apr 11 Golden State W (2d of back-to-back)
- Mon, Apr 13 LA Clippers W
- Tue, Apr 14 at LA Lakers L (possible W if Lakers rest guys?)
PHOENIX
(current: 42-34) (projected: 46-36)
(OUT)
- Sun, Apr 5 at Dallas L (beat them once already)
- Wed, Apr 8 at New Orleans L (2d of back-to-back for NO)
- Fri, Apr 10 at Memphis W
- Sat, Apr 11 at Minnesota W (2d of back-to-back)
- Mon, Apr 13 Memphis W
- Wed, Apr 15 Golden State W
Recent events and the upcoming schedule have really pushed Utah, Dallas and NO into a tier behind Houston and Portland. Phoenix is probably nothing more than a spoiler at this point, unless Dallas or Utah continues to falter and Phoenix wins out.
What that means is, we continue to hope for those teams to get wins against Houston, San Antonio or Denver to help us out, but other than that, it really becomes Portland taking care of ITS business to earn homecourt...beat Houston, and you really turn the race around, because you have the tiebreaker, so it's really a FOUR game swing depending on whether we win at Houston. How so? If we win, we get a tiebreaker on them, plus a game gained in the standings. If we lose, we fall a game behind in the standings and lose the tiebreaker, too. So, it's the difference between being TWO up or TWO down...no pressure though, Portland, no pressure. Same result if we win in San Antonio
Putting that aside, we can still:
BEAT HOUSTON (or San Antonio)!!!
Of Course, God helps those who help themselves, so the best thing Portland could do for itself would be to steal one of the Texas games, and hold serve on the other "should wins," as Portland would gain a game on Houston and/or San Antonio with a win, and would earn the tiebreaker with whichever team we beat based on the head-to head records (unless that team is a division winner, and Portland is not).
Essentially, the game against Houston has the potential for a four game swing in the standings, effectively, for Portland. (see analysis of effect of wins vs. Houston and San Antonio, above.)
ROOT FOR ADDED LOSSES FOR DENVER, HOUSTON OR SAN ANTONIO IN BOLDED GAMES ABOVE, AND/OR PRAY FOR MORE LIGHTNING LIKE TONIGHT TO STRIKE THE TEAMS ABOVE US WITH UPSET LOSSES.
BOTTOM LINE:
What we as Blazers fans should be rooting for (and that's really the question here, right?) in any game between playoff contenders in the West is that the third tier guys (or spoiler Phoenix) win a couple against the first tier guys, specifically, San Antonio, Denver Denver, and Houston. Other than that, everything going to plan means we get a four or five seed, and us beating one of the Texas teams likely gives us homecourt in the first Round.
All clear now?
9 recs |
27 comments
Comments
It is amazing how poorly western conf. playoff teams play against each other on the road.
I hope I can get a bunch of championships, like 15. " - Greg Oden
by mxpx5678 on Apr 3, 2009 9:22 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Anyone know a website that shows all teams records vs. other top teams in the west home vs away?
I hope I can get a bunch of championships, like 15. " - Greg Oden
by mxpx5678 on Apr 3, 2009 9:25 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
ESPN.COM?
You just have to go to the team pages, and seach their stats pages.
by usmcr3049 on Apr 3, 2009 9:35 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I was hoping for a site where i didnt have to scour through schedules and add up all the wins and losses.
I want to get something like
TEAM (record vs west conf playoff teams on road)
I hope I can get a bunch of championships, like 15. " - Greg Oden
by mxpx5678 on Apr 3, 2009 10:09 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
There is a thread here about it
Forget which one though.
by Zaig on Apr 3, 2009 2:20 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Here is another interesting note
Currently the Blazers are 16-20 on the road, if they win out, they will finish 21-20 on the road for a winning road record for the season! Ofcourse that would be pretty insane, and most likely won’t happen, but you never know, the road games remaining are against:
OKC – They already beat PDX in OKC, tougher game than it looks but PDX should win.
Houston – They looked like crap in PHX the other night, Yao’s a load, but PDX could win.
Memphis – should be a short night for Roy, LMA, and company.
Spurs – Pop might not play Duncan or Manu in this game because it is the 2nd of a back to back, makes this game much more winnable.
LA Clippers – this is really a trap game, the Clippers are a good team if everyone is healthy, and it seems no one knows who will be able to play on a given night for them until game time.
by usmcr3049 on Apr 3, 2009 9:40 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Good analysis
I wonder about the SA game. If it matters for seeding, does Pop care, or does he still rest his guys, I wonder? Looks very much like that game will determine seeding between Portland and SA.
Kermit on the inbounds play, inbounds....BATES at the horn, HE SCORES!! HE SCORES!!!! And they are all over Billy Ray Bates! My, oh my!!!
by blazer91 on Apr 3, 2009 9:43 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Seed probably too important for Pop to rest guys.
San Antonio wants to be in the 2/3 bracket.
by Blazin' on Apr 3, 2009 11:00 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Probably right
But he OWES us after giving Denver a win by resting guys. It’s only FAIR!
HA HA!
Kermit on the inbounds play, inbounds....BATES at the horn, HE SCORES!! HE SCORES!!!! And they are all over Billy Ray Bates! My, oh my!!!
by blazer91 on Apr 4, 2009 8:14 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
seeding is not such a big deal
for the spurs, they have been there before and know they can steal at least one on the road
"Howard, he know me" Rudy
by phillyduck23 on Apr 4, 2009 9:07 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
It would be so incredibly awesome for these young fellers to finish over .500 on the road this season!
Blazers win BDL 2 on 2 tournament!
Skeets: i’ll close it down now … congrats. you bastards
by 22baylor on Apr 3, 2009 9:57 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Agree about the analysis and the Clippers' game
… that game is a travel game on the back end of a back to back, not to mention the 4th game in 5 nights and the 5th game in 7 nights (and lots of travel thrown in… that’s crazy tough when you think about it).
It would be cool to be .500 on the road but that’s just a number, what’s more important is their confidence on the road and I think that being competitive in the games in Texas will be good enough to give them a boost for the playoff road games. A win or two in Texas would be even better.
by QuebecBlzrFan on Apr 3, 2009 12:14 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Next year's goal
Winning road record, perferably by more than 1 game. I’d like to see a 23-18 road record at least. This year, let’s just accept that we are awesome at home.
by Zaig on Apr 3, 2009 2:22 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Isn't it unrealistic...
to assume a victory over the Lakers?
by soci on Apr 3, 2009 1:26 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
not at home it isn't...and it's not ASSUMED, just projected
The L*kers don’t win in the RG.
Kermit on the inbounds play, inbounds....BATES at the horn, HE SCORES!! HE SCORES!!!! And they are all over Billy Ray Bates! My, oh my!!!
by blazer91 on Apr 3, 2009 2:48 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Thanks blazer91
This is the place to go to for playoff-seeding-obsessed Blazer fans like myself!
After the 35 pt win in OKC I’m feeling more optimistic about a win over the Spurs or Rockets, but for some reason, a little more nervous about the L*kers.
Go Blazers!
by goblazers78749 on Apr 3, 2009 10:54 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
vs LA
If LMA and Roy continue to play as well as they have the L@kers will have to be at their best to walk out of the Rose Garden with a win. If just one other Blazer gets hot the L@kers won’t be able to win. Rudy, Batum, Outlaw, and Blake have all had really impressive games and critical contributions lately. I think it is probable the Blazers will have three players “firing on all cylinders” that game. I will be shocked if the L@kers can effectivdely defend a shooter/penetrator, shooter/postup, and another shooter/penetrator all at the same time for an entire game.
by colganc on Apr 4, 2009 12:19 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
If we play D like we did against OKC
the L@kers will likely as well. The Lakers really rely on the break to open looks i transition. Lma shutting down Gasol just by running with him can take that away.
I never thought we could play Dallas if the we win out. ti’d almost be willing to throw the denver game at the end and slip to the 4 seed just to avoid them no other team in the playoffs gives us as much matchup grief.
by NWfan on Apr 4, 2009 2:44 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
i wonder
if we are able to play dallas in round one(meaning we get the two seed) then i wouldn’t be as scared of facing dallas because that would mean we continue to play as well as we are now and if that is true then i wouldn’t be scared of anyone(especially with 4 games at the rg). I know dallas has had our number this year but i think if we keep playing this way that won’t matter
"Howard, he know me" Rudy
by phillyduck23 on Apr 4, 2009 9:11 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
When you think about it
the losses we have had to Dallas have usually come after big wins over big teams. (ie lakers). Maybe its not them, maybe its when we play them.
Still don’t want to go up against them though, just a thought about why we have problems against the mavs.
I Blazersedge daily, nightly and ever so rightly.
by Claire on Apr 4, 2009 10:08 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Denver will find a way to lose a game we aren't expecting.
Portland is primed for a 15 point win in Houston tomorrow.
by cloudydays on Apr 4, 2009 11:43 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Wow, who would have thought we'd be jockey for home court in the postseason?
I admit, i didn’t think phoenix would fall off this hard, and everyone overhyped utah. People were professing Utah and Houston to be elite teams, and we are in the thick of the competition with them, awesome. Denver is now elite though, lame. Are we almost elite yet? We just need to beat a couple of our fiercest competitors on the road and/or win a playoff series and we will be very close to being considered elite i think.
by appel82 on Apr 4, 2009 4:45 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Please find a way to say exactly this to Sir Charles and Kenny on-air
FTW
"The match in Los Angeles is a good opportunity to begin to demonstrate that we want to make war." Rudy Fernández (translated)
by G_dubs on Apr 5, 2009 12:51 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs

by 




















