Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Knicks Beat Lakers With Familiar Strategy

[Updated] Game 5 Recap: Blazers 88, Rockets 77... Game 6 Ahead

[Update:  The NBA has scheduled Game 6 for 6:30 p.m. Pacific, 8:30 Central on Thursday.  It will be televised nationally on TNT.]

In the immortal words of Socrates... Ohhhhh, what a rush! 

Boxscore

Oh wait.  That was Road Warrior Hawk, huh?  Who cares...the Blazers WON!!!

The Blazers played a nice game tonight.  Instead of fighting straightforward they went right a little, left a little, mixed up their jabs and crosses, and pursued the opponent with an impeccable sense of timing.  Houston fought back but wasn't quite sure which way to turn on either end.  Coupled with a little old-fashioned grit, it was enough to help the Blazers put the game away and force a sixth game on Thursday night in Houston.

The game started on an interesting note.  The Rockets theoretically had no pressure on them tonight.  The Blazers theoretically held the weight of the world (or at least the season) on their shoulders.  But the Rockets, though pursuing their usual tactic of going inside for easy shots, looked as though they were forcing everything.  The Blazers, though attempting the same jumpers as always as the game began, played free and easy.  The Rockets started faltering.  The Blazers started scoring.

A couple of developments became apparent right away.  First of all, Steve Blake wasn't going down without a fight.  Instead of dribbling around the perimeter he started taking the ball inside, freeing himself for short jumpers or a teammate for a layup or open shot.  Second, the Blazers were committed to getting the ball inside no matter how they had to do it.  When Brandon Roy and LaMarcus Aldridge got locked down by the Houston defense this inside play took the form of pitches to Joel Przybilla.  So be it.  He got a layup or two off of those passes but the points were secondary to the message:  We're not going to stay away from you tonight.

As the Blazers committed to getting the ball inside a funny thing happened.  A strange noise was heard in the Rose Garden...

Tweet!

No, it wasn't the socialite in Row A informing her Twitter following to look for her on camera.  It was a referee's whistle.  And it wasn't blowing against the Blazers.

So let's get the reffing thing out of the way right away.  This was an experienced, good crew.  Once they saw that both teams were going to attack they more or less swallowed their whistles for the first quarter and let them play.  I am always in favor of this tactic when it's possible, as that's what people pay to see.  The Blazers ended up with a 23-10 free throw attempt advantage, so not even the most greedy Blazer fan should be making any negative comments about the officiating tonight.  The Rockets' fans are going to complain.  That's the way it goes.  Unless you want to be total and complete hypocrites as Blazer fans I suggest you take it in stride.

Basically the Blazers made it easy for the referees to blow whistles in their favor tonight.  The refs obliged.  When the Rockets have done this the refs have obliged them as well.  If both teams do it at once we'll have a real contest.

Will the officiating be the same on Thursday?  No, it will not.  The Blazers know this going in and they better be prepared to keep making it easy for the officials to see things their way sometimes.  If not they will suffer the consequences.  I think the Blazers showed tonight that it's not all that hard.  Just refrain from chucking isolation jumpers from 15-20 feet every time down the floor.

As far as the all-important center position, Joel Przybilla got to play most of the first quarter and logged the second-most minutes tonight (33) of any game in the series.  Curiously enough he grabbed his second-fewest total rebounds (6) and by far his fewest rebounds per minute in the series.  Yao Ming also had a good night with 15 points and 12 rebounds, so it's not like Joel's extended presence was shutting him down.  And Greg Oden picked up as many fouls as usual.  Therefore one might conclude that whistles alone (and having the Portland centers on the floor alone) aren't determining the outcomes of these games.  Something else is going on here.

That something else was evident throughout the quarter for Portland.  The Blazers rebounded and forced turnovers, thus controlling the ball.  On offense they moved the ball consistently and decisively, penetrated by foot and air, and hit their shots.  This isn't exactly rocket science but the Blazers have made it seem so for much of the series.

Two other developments shaped the first period.

First, we have an announcement to make:

Welcome to the 2009 NBA Playoffs, LaMarcus Aldridge!!!

LMA was as dominant in the first period of this game as we've seen all season.  He just destroyed the Rockets with his jumper and his turn-around.  The ball going in as it left his hands visibly eased the pressure on every other Blazer on the floor.  LaMarcus carrying the team, even for a little while, soothed the fear among his teammates that they alone might have to.  The Blazers have been trying to establish LaMarcus early in every game.  It was incredible to see him finally come through.  25 points and 7 rebounds on the night.

The second development was Rudy Fernandez becoming the first substitute off of the Portland bench, coming in with 6:15 left in the first.  He helped ball and player movement, hit the deep ball, and poked away steals...all the usual Rudy stuff.  Though he hit only 2-7 shots and committed 3 turnovers he got 7 points, 4 rebounds, and 3 steals for the game.  He also looked like he wanted to play and belonged playing out there.

It's not like the Rockets ceased fighting back in the face of Portland's offense.  They scored 26 in the period to the Blazers' 29.  Aaron Brooks was breaking us down.  Luis Scola flat-out abused us, feasting on the collapsing defense we threw at Yao and the awkward switches on picks.  But Portland will take a 29-26 quarter over a 17-15 one any day against this team.

At the end of the period the Rockets had scored far more in the paint but the Blazers had scored far more from beyond the arc.  Slight lead and onward.

The second period, while featuring less offensive success for both teams, enhanced Portland's lead.  The main feature of this stanza was the Blazers pushing the tempo consistently.  This is another hallmark of Portland's best play that has been largely missing in this series.  Whether the point guard was Blake or Sergio, the Blazers ran it up the court and made the Rockets follow.  Travis Outlaw, though struggling through another difficult offensive night, helped set the stage by bringing high energy and some nice rebounding.  He moved his feet on defense this game, whether guarding his man straight up or helping.  Sergio Rodriguez was also active and Steve Blake contributed bail-out jumpers...a necessary part of the Portland safety plan also lacking heretofore.

The Blazers didn't get the ball as deep in this period as they did in the first but they kept moving and didn't settle for early or guarded jumpers and it was enough.  They also rebounded and kept the Rockets from scoring easily.

After a 21-17 quarter the lead was extended by 4 and the Blazers walked into the locker room up 7.  More importantly for the first time in the series we were able to say that the Blazers controlled an entire half and forced Houston to compensate instead of vice-versa.

Something I should have mentioned before the game and neglected to is that there is often a pattern in these elimination games.  The team facing elimination will come out with a great burst of energy and build a lead.  Everything is on track for another game.  But the team that's ahead in the series weathers the storm, waits for the early energy and enthusiasm to dissipate, and slowly reels in the streaking underdogs.  As soon as the dominant team erases the deficit and takes the lead the underdog crumbles and there you have it.  Game over, series over, the underdog's fans are left crying and wondering what just happened.

Perhaps you'll understand the justifiable nervousness, then, when the Rockets held Portland to 14 points in the third quarter.  Brandon Roy tried to score to keep the momentum going but he looked tired and could only manage long jumpers which fell short.  The Blazers also turned the ball over frequently in the period.  Meanwhile the Rockets either got the ball to Yao or found interior shots.  The Rockets also started grabbing rebounds.  All of this spelled trouble for the Blazers.

Three things kept Portland in the game.  First, LaMarcus continued to score.  He was responsible for 10 of the Blazers' 14 points in the period and assisted on 2 more.  He was really the only offensive bright spot.  Second the Blazers played good team defense despite the offensive slump.  Even though Houston was playing to their strengths Portland didn't let them get anything easy.  Third, as the period progressed Aaron Brooks decided he would be one of the main catalysts of the comeback.  You may remember at the beginning of the series (and even as Brooks was scoring 20+ in those first games) I mentioned something about not fearing Brooks being the main guy because eventually that would turn to the Blazers' good.  Tonight was one of those nights.  The speedy point guard went "Clang! Clang! Clang!" far more than the trolley. 

The end result was the Rockets only managing 19 to Portland's 14.  The lead was down to 2 but Portland still held on.

The Blazers actually lost the lead in the fourth quarter as they began the period shooting outside.  When Von Wafer hit a jumper to push it to 68-64 Houston with 9:33 left Blazer fans let out a collective groan.  However this was not going to be Houston's night.

After slumbering all game long Brandon Roy finally came to life fully.  He started blistering the Rockets in every conceivable way:  inside, outside, upside-down...uptown, downtown, all around town.  Though he connected on only 9 of 20 shots for the night he provided 14 points in the quarter to finish with 25 overall.  Meanwhile Greg Oden showed some life and aggression on both ends and on the boards.  Joel Przybilla continued that them when he subbed back in.  With both the interior and exterior working and the Blazers committing to defense as they had all game, they took the lead back from the Rockets and never relinquished it.  This is no mean feat.  They could have given up when Houston came back.  They didn't.  They took the game.

The final result was a 24-15 quarter in Portland's favor and an 11-point win overall.

The difference in this game from games previous was first commitment to a winning style:  inside-out movement on offense, drives and interior plays to draw fouls, energy on defense, rebounding.  The second and third elements were confidence and perseverance.  A huge slice of the credit goes to Brandon Roy's supporting cast, all of whom gave something important in this game.  None of them outside of LaMarcus had what you'd call a perfect, or even a stand-out, game.  But every one of them played better than they have in previous games and kept the proceedings energized and relatively mistake-free.

---------------------------------------------------------------------

Interlude:

Since I often find myself frustrated by announcers I want to give a shout out to NBA TV's Rick Kamla, who called this game along with former Blazer Steve Smith.  Since most of you will have watched the local feed with Mike and Mike, I'll explain.  Kamla doesn't have the typical resonant voice of a broadcaster.  He doesn't employ catchy phrases to describe the action and get over.  He brings enthusiasm and more importantly a real, deep knowledge of the players in the game, up to and including the deep bench guys.  His roots are showing.  He actually knows his stuff...and not just in the "I asked the opposing announcing crew for tips an hour before the game" way.  I hope Rick sees this and I hope the networks are listening.  I don't know if I'm a typical viewer or not but I think I speak for more than just myself when I say that I could stand a little less resonance.  I could live without the catchphrases.  And I've had more than my fill of "personalities" trying to make a name for themselves (or hold onto those names) by interjecting themselves into the action.  Give me simple.  Give me knowledgeable.  Give me a guy who knows when to throw to the color analyst.  And give me a guy who sounds like he's enjoying calling the game.  Give Rick Kamla a chance to do more games.

--------------------------------------------------------------------

So now it's on to Game 6.  Hopefully the Blazers can bottle the enthusiasm and some of the lessons they learned and cart both down to Houston.  Expecting a win would be a bit much, but if it's another close game you have to think the Blazers have more of a chance now that they know what it's like to tear a game away from the Rockets.  Either way, they've given us just what we wanted:  a chance to sit on the edge of our seats and root for them again.

Well done.

Check out the Gameday Threads here.

The Jersey Contest playoff results and standings:

  • Sir-1  63, Total= 267
  • FromAfar   70, Total =  238
  • Tweener  77, Total = 236
  • MavetheGreat  33, Total = 208

The next form follows the last in that it has three "Will the Blazers win?" questions plus a question about the plus-minus of the players.  Anything could happen yet.  It's not over until the Blazers bow out.

Between the playoff write-ups, driving to do radio and the podcast and then returning, and regular work stuff I've had about 10 hours of sleep total over the past three nights, so I am going to pass out now and not wake up until well after the sun.  Thank goodness the Blazers have given me something pleasant to dream about.

A happy Tuesday night and Wednesday morning to you all.  Enjoy the good feelings.

--Dave (blazersub@yahoo.com)

Comment 168 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Heck of the game

Blazers will win in Houston. They know they have to, and they know how.

by rmcdougall on Apr 28, 2009 11:24 PM PDT reply actions  

Wow.

Game just ended a little while ago and you have a 30 page dissertation on it already posted.

Thanks Dave. I expect nothing less.

tbd

by Diggidy on Apr 28, 2009 11:27 PM PDT reply actions  

What a brilliant man.
In the immortal words of Socrates… Ohhhhh, what a rush!

"Aneurysm".

When Outlaw wins a game on a last-second shot, it’s called an "annthefaneurysm". QualityPie

by annthefan on Apr 28, 2009 11:30 PM PDT reply actions  

I actually think we'll keep our heads.

23-10 may have been the official statistic, but they were well deserved. No complaints from this Rockets fan against the officiating, aside from the usual missed call or two. Hopefully the rest of us will realize that the referees had nothing to do with our loss.

The Dream Shake
"I think girls are probably just better shooters." - Steve Novak

by Tom Martin on Apr 28, 2009 11:33 PM PDT reply actions  

Thanks

The complaining about the refs over here has been nauseating this series. I don’t really care what the refs do. You can’t control it. You just have to play better.

Even though the fouls were lopsided again tonight, I’m glad you’re able to look beyond it.

by tominrehab on Apr 28, 2009 11:42 PM PDT up reply actions  

Rockets fans are being pretty classy about this loss and the refereeing

For the most part, that is, which is all you can expect. Judging from the reactions this was probably the best officiated game of the series. There were calls missed both ways, but they’re not going to be perfect. It was nice in that for the most part the player rotations were not dictated by the refs. I hope that continues in game 6 and that win or lose the players and coaches decide the game, not touch fouls called on either team.

by KitIsh on Apr 28, 2009 11:45 PM PDT up reply actions  

The gamecap at ESPN closed with this comment on officiating

Rockets 77, Trail Blazers 88
Recap Box Score Play-By-Play Shot Chart Photos Conversation
1 2 3 4 T
HOU (3-2) 26 17 19 15 77
POR (2-3) 29 21 14 24 88
Final
10:00 PM ET, April 28, 2009
Rose Garden
Portland, OR
Blazers beat Rockets to stay alive
Blazers Hold Off Rockets, 88-77
WERE YOU THERE?
passport Did you attend this game? If so, start chronicling your sports memories today with ESPN’s Sports Passport. Enter the games you attend, upload your photos and share your memories! I was there "
Photo Wire

Houston Rockets center Yao Ming waits for the ball to come down the court in the fourth quarter of Game 5 of the NBA Western Conference first-round playoff basketball series in Portland, Ore., Tuesday, April 28, 2009. The Trail Blazers staved off elimination in the playoffs with an 88-77 victory over the Rockets. (AP Photo/Houston Chronicle, Nick de la Torre)

· View photo | View gallery
Team Stat Comparison
HOUSTON PORTLAND
Points 77 88
FG Made-Attempted 33-73 (.452) 33-72 (.458)
3P Made-Attempted 3-15 (.200) 6-14 (.429)
FT Made-Attempted 8-10 (.800) 16-23 (.696)
Rebounds (Offensive-Total) 3-36 7-37
Assists 17 14
Turnovers 17 12
Steals 5 10
Blocks 1 8
Fast Break Points 7 5
Fouls (Tech/Flagrant) 24 (0/0) 12 (0/0)
Largest Lead 4 13
Top Performers
HOUSTON PORTLAND
L. Scola
Points: 21
Reb: 6
Ast: 2
Stl: 0
Blk: 0
L. Aldridge
Points: 25
Reb: 7
Ast: 2
Stl: 1
Blk: 0
Game Leaders
  HOUSTON PORTLAND
Points L. Scola 21 L. Aldridge 25
Rebounds Y. Ming 12 L. Aldridge 7
Assists R. Artest 5 J. Przybilla 4
Steals R. Artest 2 R. Fernandez 3
Blocks S. Battier 1 R. Fernandez 2
· Team stats: Houston | Portland
Series
Houston leads 3-2
Sat 4/18 HOU 108, @ POR 81 Recap | Box Score
Tue 4/21 @POR 107, HOU 103 Recap | Box Score
Fri 4/24 @HOU 86, POR 83 Recap | Box Score
Sun 4/26 @HOU 89, POR 88 Recap | Box Score
" Tue 4/28 @POR 88, HOU 77 Recap | Box Score
Apr 30, 2009 POR @ HOU 9:30 PM ET
May 2, 2009 HOU @ POR 12:00 AM ET
· Complete Schedule: Trail Blazers | Rockets
Associated Press

PORTLAND, Ore. — Brandon Roy was so sick he could barely make it through shootaround.

“I felt pretty lousy,” he said.

Luckily for the Portland Trail Blazers, their All-Star guard didn’t play that way.

Fast Facts

• The Trail Blazers went on 15-0 run to turn a four-point deficit into an 11-point lead in the fourth quarter as they pulled to within 3-2 in the series.

• LaMarcus Aldridge and Brandon Roy scored 25 apiece for the Blazers. Aldridge is averaging 26.0 PPG in Blazers wins in this series and 13.0 PPG in Blazers losses.

• The Rockets have lost nine of last 11 road playoff games.

— ESPN Stats & Information

Roy had an IV before Game 5, then went out and scored 25 points to help the Trail Blazers stave off elimination with an 88-77 victory over the Houston Rockets on Tuesday night. LaMarcus Aldridge also had 25.

The Rockets, who have not advanced out of the first round of the playoffs in six tries since 1997, hold a 3-2 advantage in the series going into Thursday night’s game back in Houston.

Roy, a two-time All-Star, missed practice on Monday because of flu-like symptoms, while Aldridge didn’t practice because of a sore right elbow. Both started Tuesday night.

“I’ve been involved in games when I didn’t feel well and played well. Some nights when guys come in under the weather they play their best games. And Brandon had one of those best games tonight,” Blazers coach Nate McMillan said. “He came out, took an IV before the game, and played like a champion.”

Luis Scola led the Rockets with 21 points. Yao Ming had 15 points and 12 rebounds.

Houston trailed until the fourth quarter, when Yao and Von Wafer hit consecutive jumpers to put the Rockets ahead 68-64. The Blazers tied it at 68, then Greg Oden had another two free throws to give the Blazers back the lead.

2009 NBA Playoffs

Want an in-depth look at the playoffs? Check out all the matchups, analysis and opinion here:
• Playoff pages

Travis Outlaw and Roy padded it with a pair of 3-pointers to make it 77-68 with 5:21 to go. After Roy added a running jumper, the Rose Garden fans were on their feet, with one fan raising a sign that read “Bring down the Rockets!”

Aaron Brooks hit a running jumper to close the Rockets to 80-75, but it was as close as Houston would come.

“Obviously, our worst game of the series,” Yao said. “Hopefully, next game, execution will result in our best game.”

Portland went on a 17-4 run in the first quarter, taking a 23-13 lead on Aldridge’s 18-footer. But Houston’s Scola hit seven of nine shots from the floor and ended the quarter with 15 points, and the Rockets cut the deficit to 29-26 to start the second quarter.

The Blazers built a 46-36 lead late in the first half, but the Rockets closed within 48-43 on Yao’s dunk. Roy finished out the half with a driving layup to give Portland a 50-43 lead.

Aldridge handed off to Joel Przybilla for a dunk to put the Blazers ahead 56-45. Houston answered with a 12-2 run, capped by Yao’s jumper, to close to within 58-57.

Brooks’ pull-up 3-pointer tied it at 60 and Houston finally pulled ahead on Yao’s turnaround jumper that made it 66-64 early in fourth.

Roy said he finally found the “bounce” to his step in the fourth quarter. He had nine points in the first half, when the Blazers turned to Aldridge, who had 15.

“I think they noticed I wasn’t feeling well, so I think they took it into their own hands,” Roy said about his teammates.

The Blazers had not been to the playoffs since 2003. Portland surprisingly clinched the Western Conference’s fourth seed and home-court advantage.

The Rockets won the opener at the Rose Garden, but dropped Game 2 before returning to Houston for the next two games, both victories.

The Blazers kept it close in Game 4, but made crucial mistakes in the final two minutes for an 89-88 Rockets’ win. Yao had 21 points and 12 rebounds.

Yao got off to a slow start back in Portland — he didn’t even attempt a shot in the first quarter.

“I felt good when we were ahead four points,” Yao said. “But we fouled too much too early in the fourth quarter and it left us in a bad situation in the penalty. Foul trouble killed us.”

The Rockets went to the free-throw line just 10 times in the game and made eight attempts. But coach Rick Adelman, earlier in the day fined $25,000 for criticizing the officiating during the playoffs, kept his silence.

Portland made 16 of 23 free-throw attempts.

Game notes
McMillan also was fined $25,000 by the NBA on Tuesday for comments made about officiating during the playoff series. Asked for his reaction, McMillan said: “My mother’s gone but she gave me great advice as a player: ‘Shut your mouth and do your job.’” Adelman said he had no comment. Boston coach Doc Rivers also was fined over comments about officials during the playoffs.
-———————

So there you go both Nate and Rick get fined the Blazers win.

by NWfan on Apr 29, 2009 12:16 AM PDT up reply actions  

No problem. I enjoyed reading most of it.

Anyone who doesn’t like to read a lot should stay away from Blazers Edge.

by MiledAnimal on Apr 29, 2009 8:54 AM PDT up reply actions  

it was a great atmosphere

at the RG again, loud and crazy

Here is my Playoff mode signature, that I thought up myself: "Just Do It".

by johnv59 on Apr 28, 2009 11:34 PM PDT reply actions  

Yes it was.

The loudest playoff game so far (game 1 shouldn’t count).

Regarding BRoy:"Another day, another buzzer-beater. This man is so clutch he sets his body clock to go off one second before his alarm does every morning."

~Rob D from NBAmate

by twiggs on Apr 29, 2009 6:04 AM PDT up reply actions  

Twiggs....

I think you were sitting behind me. Were you in section 315, row F, seat 3 or 4?

Here is my Playoff mode signature, that I thought up myself: "Just Do It".

by johnv59 on Apr 29, 2009 7:01 PM PDT up reply actions  

I love watching our boys grow up.

Well done tonight LMA.

I think we will see a more and more polished team defense resulting from the lessons learned, and LaMarcus now knows that he can elevate his play in the post season.

The cake continues to bake.

Bedge or go home.

by Ojala John on Apr 28, 2009 11:36 PM PDT reply actions  

LMA was unstoppable

For one of the first times this season, it felt to me throughout the game like Lamarcus was the best player on the court (for either team). Maybe that was due to Brandon’s flu-like symptoms (and of course Roy did dig down and step it up down the stretch), but either way it says more about Lamarcus’s performance than anything else.

LMA was dominant. Inside, outside, pick your poison, he was scoring either way. He had an attacking mentality and took the jumpers when they were there in the flow of the offense. I kept thinking that the only reason the Rockets were hanging around was because Lamarcus wasn’t getting enough shots, and Roy needed to defer more and keep the ball moving. That’s not something that anybody rooting for the Blazers normally thinks!

LMA played like one of the best PFs in the league. If he can sustain that type of play, he’ll be an all star next year. Easily.

Q: Is Greg favoring his knee?
Frye: He favors dunking on your head, that's what he favors.

by KP Corleone on Apr 29, 2009 6:58 AM PDT up reply actions  

That's what some of us have been saying all along.

People can keep their Amare’s and Chris Boshes. We don’t need a PF, as we have one of the best young players in the league at that position.

hakkaa päälle !

by timg56 on Apr 29, 2009 7:37 AM PDT up reply actions  

LMA wasn't hesitating last night

he (for the most part) just take the open sgot and just rose up and stroked it

"You're welcome friend
I love you."
- Tom "Dragline" inHawaii

by 92wastheyear on Apr 29, 2009 8:43 AM PDT up reply actions  

I am sure he is around

"You're welcome friend
I love you."
- Tom "Dragline" inHawaii

by 92wastheyear on Apr 29, 2009 8:56 AM PDT up reply actions  

Yeah, jksnake hated Lamarcus's first-half D

I would agree that LMA is a little confused sometimes about what to do, given that he’s responsible for both the lob to Yao down low and Scola up top.

Two of Scola’s buckets were obvious push-offs with the left hand. And the jumpers from 20 feet, you have to live with (although the close out could come a little quicker).

I didn’t think LMA was brilliant on D, but I don’t attribute quite as much of the blame to him for most of Scola’s buckets.

Q: Is Greg favoring his knee?
Frye: He favors dunking on your head, that's what he favors.

by KP Corleone on Apr 29, 2009 9:22 AM PDT up reply actions  

Ooh forgot about Scola's first pushoff

That one god the crowd going, since Scola reached out pretty far to make the contact with LMA. Pretty blatant miss.

by Zaig on Apr 29, 2009 11:28 AM PDT up reply actions  

Scola is a repeat offender!

If he is trying to score in the post, replay almost always shows him push off with his left hand or swipe down or hook the defender around the hip…It’s been called once (last night)

‘OK Nic, swag on out on ‘em!’

by clinchmobb on Apr 29, 2009 11:58 AM PDT up reply actions  

Good recap..I'm still torn over whether I really like Kamla or am really annoyed by him.

I think part of my problem is that I’m still mad at him for telling me I needed a “sanity check” when I called into his fantasy show a few years ago. I came on and declared Z-Bo the third best power forward in the league. He laughed and hung up on me quite abruptly.

Goodbye Deke. The NBA will miss Mt. Mutombo.

by prezofdeath on Apr 28, 2009 11:37 PM PDT reply actions  

LOL...that is a funny story

You really thought that Z-Bo was the third best PF in the league?

Life is not by chance. Basketball is life.

by blzrfan on Apr 28, 2009 11:39 PM PDT up reply actions  

Even for fantasy

You probably deserved that. He’s a 20-10 guy, but gives you no other stats.

by KitIsh on Apr 28, 2009 11:47 PM PDT up reply actions  

after 20-10

you need other things besides stats, not that steals and blocks are bad.

"The refs have caused a bird-pig flu pandemic"

by appel82 on Apr 29, 2009 8:29 AM PDT up reply actions  

homer4life

Goodbye Deke. The NBA will miss Mt. Mutombo.

by prezofdeath on Apr 29, 2009 10:25 AM PDT up reply actions  

Oh come on Dave. Did you actually type this up pre-game and just plug in

the statistics? Nobody can type that fast and express coherent thoughts.

"Aneurysm".

When Outlaw wins a game on a last-second shot, it’s called an "annthefaneurysm". QualityPie

by annthefan on Apr 28, 2009 11:38 PM PDT reply actions  

Did anyone else see Sophia on the NBA TV feed?

I can’t remember exactly when, but I think it was in the 4th quarter. They were doing a couple crowd shots and they showed two ladies standing and cheering.

I swear the one on the left was Sophia.

Sophia: were you sitting/standing next to a lady?

by tominrehab on Apr 28, 2009 11:38 PM PDT reply actions  

Oh yes. He's confused alright.

"Aneurysm".

When Outlaw wins a game on a last-second shot, it’s called an "annthefaneurysm". QualityPie

by annthefan on Apr 28, 2009 11:49 PM PDT up reply actions  

I thought I saw her too

Tom’s not crazy. They were cutting to a bunch of different shots of the crowd and showing signs I think, but it definitely looked like Sophia. This was on KGW by the way

by KitIsh on Apr 28, 2009 11:50 PM PDT up reply actions  

i wonder if NBATV borrows the footage from KGW/Blazers Broadcasting ...

they usually don’t even send their own announcers… usually they just play the Blazers feed.

I’m pretty sure it was her.

by tominrehab on Apr 28, 2009 11:59 PM PDT up reply actions  

My favorite stat of the night

Blake 15 points on 7 shots
Brooks 13 points on 20 shots

Blake really covered for a very lethargic looking Brandon Roy…

by blazingjim on Apr 28, 2009 11:39 PM PDT reply actions  

Blake had

his best game of the series. So did Sergio.

—Dave

by Dave on Apr 28, 2009 11:40 PM PDT up reply actions  

Yep, Sergio quietly played well when he was in.

Good driving and passing, and didn’t get burned on D.

Blake was a nice surprise after being so up and down. His confidence should be boosted by hitting a few big clutch FT’s too.

by Timmay! on Apr 28, 2009 11:41 PM PDT up reply actions  

Blake (tied with LmA) led the team in

REBOUNDING tonight!

"So, then, I was like, it'd be really dirty if I put up 42. So I did!" -Brandon Roy, post-game comments after game 2 of the first round of the 2009 NBA Playoffs

by 5212872 on Apr 29, 2009 12:50 AM PDT up reply actions  

Agreed

I though Sergio did a fine job. Penetrating and dishing and decent D

‘OK Nic, swag on out on ‘em!’

by clinchmobb on Apr 29, 2009 11:59 AM PDT up reply actions  

No respect on TNT

Oh by the way there was this other game so lets talk about it for 10 secs and go to a message

by southern oregon on Apr 28, 2009 11:40 PM PDT reply actions  

Quick's recap is online

Click here.

… Blake emerged from the huddle, walked onto the court and did a U-turn to face his teammates. Standing near midcourt, he delivered his succinct yet pointed message.

“It’s now or never”

by Timmay! on Apr 28, 2009 11:48 PM PDT reply actions  

I liked how Nate used Oden tonight.

After he picked up his two fouls, Nate pulled him like usual. But instead of trying to get him in the game in spot minutes where he can pick up his extra fouls, Nate held him till the fourth quarter. That left him with four fouls to go through in the final quarter which lets him be more aggressive.

by Jerb on Apr 28, 2009 11:50 PM PDT reply actions  

nate did a really fantastic job

and basically did everything that i wanted him to do that he didn’t in game 4, give blake more rest/sergio some time; and give rudy way more of batums minutes, it worked out great.

I’m actually surprised rudy hasn’t played more of batum’s minutes in this series, rudy has to make battier work 100 times harder on defense than batum has waiting for corner threes, which gives battier less energy on the offensive end, and keeps him honest on the defensive end.

"The refs have caused a bird-pig flu pandemic"

by appel82 on Apr 29, 2009 8:35 AM PDT up reply actions  

Brandon's questionable health.

Made other people realize he can’t do it all. This is only a good sign for game 6. We all knew this would have to be a team effort if we were to get out of this series alive. Time for our bench and role players to finally do what they have done all season, produce.

by JmarcL4 on Apr 28, 2009 11:54 PM PDT reply actions  

I JUST WANT TO SHOUT OUT TO STEVE BLAKE

He had a fantastic game on both ends. While not always serving as the distributor, he contained brooks quite well, and hit his shots. A performance which will seemingly go under the radar. Well done sir, well done.

"The important thing is not to stop questioning. Curiosity has its own reason for existing. One cannot help but be in awe when he contemplates the mysteries of eternity, of life,(of the Blazers), (of KP's madness), of the marvelous structure of reality. It is enough if one tries merely to comprehend a little of this mystery every day. Never lose a holy curiosity." - Albert Einstein

by BlazerandBeaverBELIEVER on Apr 28, 2009 11:57 PM PDT reply actions  

I can tell you firsthand, no one heard a whistle over the crowd

It was LOUD tonight. It was nice to see the players just play the game. Granted the Blazers went to the line more but they also attacked the rim more. Everytime the Blazers started driving, their lead increased and the rockets drew fouls. We got Houston into the penalty with almost 7:30 remaining in the 4th and used the fouls to get freebie points. When we started shooting jumpers, Houston clawed back but then we continued with the aggressive play and we came out ahead for it.

On rebounding, the Blazers usually only have one guy go after an offensive board who is usually the nearest guy to the rebound. I saw on several occasions that if we sent two or more players after a board, we could easily come up with a few steals. Say a rebound goes long over Joel to Yao, if the guard on the wing pursues the ball from the Yao’s back side when Yao turns away from Joel it would be right into the guard. I saw this a couple of time usually with Lamarcus and Brandon with Scola getting the rebound. We always had four guys running back to two guys for Houston. If we want to win the rebounds we regularly have to have two guys both crashing the board at the same time. It’s a simple adjustment, and one that is unlikely to get us burned by fast breaks but yet generate 2-4 more possesions per game.

by NWfan on Apr 28, 2009 11:59 PM PDT reply actions  

The offense finally looked good tonight

For most of the game, especially the first half, we were moving the ball crisply and our offense looked like it did before the Houston series. Coincidentally, the Rockets run happened when we started going one on one on offense and stopped passing. We’ve shown we can keep the Rockets to 80ish points, if we can keep this up on offense I think we have a good shot at winning. Game 6 should be a good one.

by KitIsh on Apr 28, 2009 11:59 PM PDT reply actions  

Good game guys

You guys played well and great recap. I think the foul discrepancy had a lot to do with yall being the aggressor. In the NBA the team that attacks the basket and dictates play will get more calls. Especially in the fourth the Rockets got away from their inside game and settled for jumpers which didn’t fall. There might have been 5-6 fouls that could have gone either way but in the league the home team usually gets the benefit of the call, so I can’t complain. Don’t sell us Rockets fans short though, your team outplayed us as I expected, because yall had your backs to the wall, so no excuses here. Im looking for the Rockets to come out with that kind of feeling in game 6 cuz we do not want to go back to Portland. Good luck… but not too much

by clutchcitywillreturn on Apr 29, 2009 12:00 AM PDT reply actions  

i blame the victory wine!

in other news, thanks for the classy post

don't blame the refs!

by NateMcMillan's Suit on Apr 29, 2009 12:08 AM PDT up reply actions  

I'm not saying I don't appreciate the positive vibe

but I am officially putting the word classy in the Cliche Hall of Fame, where it joins fellow overused expressions groovy, FTW, and epic fail.

by MiledAnimal on Apr 29, 2009 9:05 AM PDT up reply actions  

What about...

Book it? Doesn’t that belong too?

Blazers win!

by The X-man on Apr 29, 2009 2:45 PM PDT up reply actions  

I will be shocked

if the Blazers can win on Thursday. My hope is that it’s another close game that we somehow can pull out with a last-second shot. It’s not going to be the same Thursday night as it is tonight.

I hope the Blazers win, of course, but just about everything points to a Rockets’ victory and that’s the simple truth of it.

You guys still have my favorite non-Blazer (anymore) coach, so I’ll be glad for Rick at least if it happens.

—Dave

by Dave on Apr 29, 2009 12:08 AM PDT up reply actions  

no reason to be shocked if Portland wins

The Blazers are clearly the underdogs, but they just played two tossup games in Houston. No reason game 6 can’t be another down to the wire affair. Portland just needs to make a couple more plays. I’d give them about a 30% chance. Underdogs for sure, but a long way from shocking if they win.

by jksnake99 on Apr 29, 2009 12:12 AM PDT up reply actions  

Given Houston's success when they're driven in this series

I’d rate it as less than 30%. But there’s a chance.

—Dave

by Dave on Apr 29, 2009 12:16 AM PDT up reply actions  

Dave, come on

Over the last 4 games, Portland has outscored Houston by 11 points. Portland has played better ball in this series than Houston, except for game 1.

We’re not talking about a miracle here. We’re talking about a mild upset.

by jksnake99 on Apr 29, 2009 12:21 AM PDT up reply actions  

I wouldn't call it a miracle, to be sure

The Blazers have played better than that! I’ll still be surprised (pleasantly) if it happens.

But to my mind, especially in Houston, this has been a case of reverse rear-view-mirror-ism: Objects in the mirror may be farther away than they appear. As I said in the recap, tonight is the first time I’ve really felt the Blazers TAKE a game from Houston, taking control in the process. The good news is that the Blazers now have that momentum. They know it can be done. The bad news is that Houston knew this was a free roll for them and they’ll be out for bear on Thursday. That makes it a different kind of test.

Can we hope that the Rockets finally tighten up maybe? They can’t live forever off of people besides Artest, Brooks, and Yao. If we can moderate the contributions of the Big Three, might the other guys be more susceptable to big-game pressure?

—Dave

by Dave on Apr 29, 2009 12:27 AM PDT up reply actions  

yeah

I just see this as such a dead even series. Game 1 was an aberration. An inexcusable aberration (I don’t buy the youth excuse) but an aberration nonetheless. These teams are so evenly matched. The Blazers are a coin-flip away from being up 3-2 instead of down.

by jksnake99 on Apr 29, 2009 12:33 AM PDT up reply actions  

Coin-flip?

Game 5 was the only game that didn’t go down to the wire, minus the “aberration.” If you claim it could be 3-2, it could also be series over if the Rockets stole game 2.

by clutchcitywillreturn on Apr 29, 2009 12:44 AM PDT up reply actions  

absolutely right

I don’t disagree with that at all.

Houston was won 2 of the 3 “coin-flip” games. If they’d won all 3, the series would be over. If Portland had won 2 of 3, the Blazers would have the lead.

by jksnake99 on Apr 29, 2009 12:46 AM PDT up reply actions  

Home team

The thing you overlook is the home team won all the coin flip games. Thanks to game 1 all we need is for that trend to continue.

by clutchcitywillreturn on Apr 29, 2009 12:50 AM PDT up reply actions  

yep, I'll agree with that

that’s why the Rockets are in the driver’s seat.

by jksnake99 on Apr 29, 2009 12:54 AM PDT up reply actions  

indeed

it’s been overshadowed a bit by the Boston Chicago series though

by cloudydays on Apr 29, 2009 12:56 AM PDT up reply actions  

game 1 is the reason

"The refs have caused a bird-pig flu pandemic"

by appel82 on Apr 29, 2009 9:33 AM PDT up reply actions  

one of them at least

"The refs have caused a bird-pig flu pandemic"

by appel82 on Apr 29, 2009 9:33 AM PDT up reply actions  

don’t worry rockets have a tendency to choke or go long scoring droughts and I’m actually rooting for houston. But after watching this many games, I begin to like roy more and more maybe that also have to do with him helping my fantasy team this year. Lets see if this year’s rockets actually have a spine

by o_oholycrap on Apr 29, 2009 1:38 AM PDT up reply actions  

Too bad we can't just merge the two teams

and beat the living %$@&! out of the Lakers. Then everybody wins.

by MiledAnimal on Apr 29, 2009 9:09 AM PDT up reply actions   1 recs

best idea yet

Tonight felt like the day you open the mail and receive an acceptance letter to your dream school: the University of Playoffs. - Ben Golliver, Apr 15 2009

by 22baylor on Apr 29, 2009 10:53 AM PDT up reply actions  

Lineup

Roy
Rudy
Artest
LMA
Yao

w/ Scola 6th man. …. wow….

"...we have so many experts who think that you have to play defense, you have to rebound, you have to be a possession coach, you have to execute. I just laugh. Explosive offense is not as intimidating as dominant defense. But it is scary when you don't know how to stop someone." - George Karl, Nuggets coach

by jamon51 on Apr 29, 2009 11:08 AM PDT up reply actions  

talk about selling your team short...

the last two games in Houston were very very close, and Portland were the ones feeling the pressure because everyone thought it was important for them to gain HCA back.

Now the pressure is all on Houston cause if they don’t win on Thursday there is no way they will win in the Rose Garden

by cloudydays on Apr 29, 2009 12:46 AM PDT up reply actions  

So far...

The Rockets are the only team who’ve won on the road in the series, so never underestimate the heart of a champion, haha.

by clutchcitywillreturn on Apr 29, 2009 12:52 AM PDT up reply actions  

true

but

A) Game 1 was a bit of an aberration

B) the “champions” haven’t been out of the 1st round in 6 years lol

by cloudydays on Apr 29, 2009 12:53 AM PDT up reply actions  

Haha touché

The champions comment was too far but you guys haven’t been to the playoffs in like 5 years… Looks like both of us have had a hard time rooting for our teams lately

by clutchcitywillreturn on Apr 29, 2009 1:03 AM PDT up reply actions  

rofl since 1998 more like 11 years

by o_oholycrap on Apr 29, 2009 1:39 AM PDT up reply actions  

This coming from the man who predicted

47 wins for the Blazers this season? Sorry Dave, your credibility is shot!

by MiledAnimal on Apr 29, 2009 9:10 AM PDT up reply actions  

Way to call him out ... haha

"...we have so many experts who think that you have to play defense, you have to rebound, you have to be a possession coach, you have to execute. I just laugh. Explosive offense is not as intimidating as dominant defense. But it is scary when you don't know how to stop someone." - George Karl, Nuggets coach

by jamon51 on Apr 29, 2009 11:09 AM PDT up reply actions  

Shocking because...

Correct me if im wrong but haven’t the Rockets beaten them 11 times out of the last 12 in Houston? That is why i would be shocked. Plus, Yao wants this bad

by clutchcitywillreturn on Apr 29, 2009 12:17 AM PDT up reply actions  

well yes, but

Only 4 of those 12 games are this year. Before this year, Portland was a much worse team than Houston. This year, the teams are essentially equal. Portland is 0-4 in Houston this year… if anything I think that means they are due. I’ll stick with my 30%.

by jksnake99 on Apr 29, 2009 12:20 AM PDT up reply actions  

I wont be shocked

Game1 is being called an aberration, because Rockets shot lights out, and all cylinders were firing . The Blazers are yet to have a similar lights out explosion, where everyone is firing on all cylinders. The odds of at least one such game in 6 is high, and it hasn’t happened yet. So technically the Blazers are due! Even if Game 6 is not a Blazers explosion, the other games at Houston have been very close. Again, the odds of the Blazers winning at least 1 in 3 close games is high. Now putting these together, the odds could actually be higher than 50%.

But the refs have had a big influence on the outcome of each of Games 2-5. They will do so again. So the final odds may be a little lower than 50% because in a close game, the Blazers will have to overcome the ref bias (call it home-team or whatever) and the crowd support.

At this point in the series, I believe that Portland is the stronger team. Game 1 was a “Big Moose in the Headlights” experience for a young team playing their first playoff game. Game 3 was a “Deer in the Headlights” experience playing first road playoff game. They actually had the lead in Game 4 and let it slip away — or at least experienced the impact of 4th quarter ref bias. Just like they benefited from the same ref bias after the Rockets had the 4th quarter lead in Game 5. These experiences are under their belts, and the Blazers now know what is required to win a road playoff game.

Game 6 is too close to call. I wont be shocked if they lose. I wont be shocked if they win!
I will be very excited. But I wont be shocked!

by FromAfar on Apr 29, 2009 12:48 PM PDT up reply actions  

gamblers fallacy

The odds of it happening in any given game are no better just because it hasn’t happened recently.

by Zaig on Apr 29, 2009 4:24 PM PDT up reply actions  

Yet the bell curve still happens.

Yes, you are perfectly right, that odds in any given game are no better that the previous instance — provided that all other aspects are equal. However, my point is that the Blazers entered the series with an experience inequality, and yet have lost very close games at Houston. This disadvantage is rapidly eroding, and I propose that the odds are now tilting in the Blazers favor.

by FromAfar on Apr 29, 2009 5:37 PM PDT up reply actions  

Rick Kamla

One of the best announcers I’ve ever heard. What a change from the horrible announcing of Doug Collins and his lackey.

by Liface on Apr 29, 2009 12:06 AM PDT reply actions  

why would you consider Collins horrible?

just curious cause of all the network talking heads I like him the most.

don't blame the refs!

by NateMcMillan's Suit on Apr 29, 2009 12:25 AM PDT up reply actions  

since you're up

What are your top three books on basketball? Just finishing breaks of the game and other than that I’ve only read Freedarko’s

book and Red Hot and Rolling. Could be about a player, a team, a coach, a fan base etc.

don't blame the refs!

by NateMcMillan's Suit on Apr 29, 2009 12:32 AM PDT up reply actions  

Yeah I like Hubie too

He is catchphrase central with his…“Now If I’m (insert coach’s name here), I’m…” But he is definitely knowledgable and doesn’t get on my nerves. Seems to be pretty fair in his comments about either team playing. Unfortunately, he always gets stuck on the “A” games and that rarely includes Portland.

SOME PEOPLE ARE LIKE SLINKIES. NOT REALLY GOOD FOR ANYTHING BUT THEY BRING A SMILE TO YOUR FACE WHEN PUSHED DOWN THE STAIRS.

by MrGrinch on Apr 29, 2009 8:43 AM PDT up reply actions  

I shouldn't have said "A" games...more like the eastern conference games

SOME PEOPLE ARE LIKE SLINKIES. NOT REALLY GOOD FOR ANYTHING BUT THEY BRING A SMILE TO YOUR FACE WHEN PUSHED DOWN THE STAIRS.

by MrGrinch on Apr 29, 2009 8:43 AM PDT up reply actions  

You didn't ask me, but...

…Game Four was just brutal to watch live. In the waning moments of the game, both announcers would call every Houston shot as if it were a phenomenal buzzer-beating game-winner, and then act only mildly surprised when Roy or any other Blazer would respond in kind.

This is probably something I was only sensitive to because I was an already stressed-out Blazers fan, but it got seriously aggravating by the end of the game. I know that the announcers don’t have any direct effect on the game, and were probably feeding off the energy of the Houston crowd, but it sucks to watch “impartial” announcers call a game with a pretty distinct energy disparity that favors the other team.

by Blaz on Apr 29, 2009 1:26 AM PDT up reply actions  

I felt the same way when I was watching the game.

It may have been that I was really stressed, but it really seemed like Houston was the favorite of the announcers. Yao would hit a three foot hook shot and everyone would flip out like hit his 8th three in a row to take the lead.

by Jerb on Apr 29, 2009 1:41 AM PDT up reply actions  

Same for Game 5

Probably is a home court thing. I noticed last night the announcer sounded a tad impartial with a big 3 from (Roy or Blake?). Sounded like a local Portland broadcast. Or maybe cause Steve Smith is an ex-Blazer?

by Skintrade on Apr 29, 2009 11:13 AM PDT up reply actions  

LMA was as dominant in the first period of this game as we’ve seen all season. He just destroyed the Rockets with his jumper and his turn-around. The ball going in as it left his hands visibly eased the pressure on every other Blazer on the floor. LaMarcus carrying the team, even for a little while, soothed the fear among his teammates that they alone might have to. The Blazers have been trying to establish LaMarcus early in every game. It was incredible to see him finally come through. 25 points and 7 rebounds on the night.

I’m sorry, but I have to mention this. LMA was absolutely brutal on defense in the first half. Just awful. He overhelped. He got schooled 1v1. He was weak on the inside. He didn’t rebound. He was great on offense and its a darn good thing too because Scola was doing the same right back at him.

In the 2nd half, the Blazers played D.

What I will remember from this game is Greg Oden. He was so pathetic in his first two stints that I literally wanted to cry. I was pretty freaking depressed. Then in his 3rd stint he had 2 blocks, knocked away an entry pass, forced a couple Yao misses, got a couple rebounds and hit 2 FTs… all in like a 5 minute span. I fell back in love with him.

by jksnake99 on Apr 29, 2009 12:11 AM PDT reply actions  

LMA

has been semi-brutal on defense most of the series. But he did wake up some last game and in the second half of this one.

Scola isn’t all his fault though. Luis is benefitting from several Blazers not being able to guard their men one-on-one and him being the guy the Blazers are deciding to let beat them. I’d love to see LaMarcus get back to him a little quicker though after he shades over. But then we’d have to sacrifice any chance of him getting a rebound. Then again, when Scola hits at that rate there are no rebounds to be had on those shots.

—Dave

by Dave on Apr 29, 2009 12:15 AM PDT up reply actions  

I definetely agree Scola's points aren't all on LaMarcus

I’ve said myself I can live with letting him do some damage to limit Yao. In the 1st half of this particular game, I felt LaMarcus was directly responsible for a number of Houston baskets though. I thought it was a really poor effort from him. It was much better in the 2nd half.

by jksnake99 on Apr 29, 2009 12:18 AM PDT up reply actions  

Do you suppose

LaMarcus is hurting more than he’s letting on? Until this outpouring I’ve been generally disappointed with his series.

—Dave

by Dave on Apr 29, 2009 12:28 AM PDT up reply actions  

I don't think so

This was his 2nd very strong offensive game of the series. In general, I think we’ve seen the usual LaMarcus D— quite a bit of good, quite a bit of bad. Tonight I thought the 1st half was especially bad and the 2nd half was better than usual. He also got some key 4th quarter rebounds which was nice. His 1st half rebounding was brutal.

I think he’s fine. We’ll see if he can put 2 good offensive games together and bring a little D as well. I think he can do it, but I certainly won’t be shocked if he doesn’t.

by jksnake99 on Apr 29, 2009 12:31 AM PDT up reply actions  

Agreed

Scola wasn’t 100% LMA’s fault, but quite a bit of it was. I noticed that he also had 0 rebounds at halftime, although that means he grabbed 7 rebounds in the second half. Hopefully he can bring a complete game to both of the halves tomorrow, and hopefully Rudy just chose tonight to shoot bad because he knew we wouldn’t need him.

by Zaig on Apr 29, 2009 9:09 AM PDT up reply actions  

Any thoughts on Battier...

pulling a Rasheed-esque meltdown in the 4th quarter. Przybilla sets what looks like a good screen. Joel sets up, doesn’t move laterally at all. Battier tries to run right through him. Then goes absolutely balistic when a foul is called. I can’t imagine that Battier had a problem with the foul call, but perhaps that was his beef. It seemed he was convinced that Joel had set an illegal pick. He’s the guy that is supposed to be mature, experienced, composed… and he goes nuts. Not sure how much it contributed to the final outcome, but seems to show how Houston may really be feeling big-time pressure to get out of the 1st round.

I really think if we can put some pressure on Houston in game 6 we might see the Rockets lose a bit of composure under the heat. Good to see the Blazers playing cool down the stretch tonight. Obviously doing it on the road is a bigger test.

by 52therim on Apr 29, 2009 12:33 AM PDT reply actions  

I think the foul was on him holding Brandon's arm

He was working the ref afterword trying to get the next call. It was a smart move as he didn’t get a T.

by KitIsh on Apr 29, 2009 12:52 AM PDT up reply actions  

Yeah I love his complaints there...

“I’VE BEEN ABLE TO GRAB ROY’S ARM ALL SERIES, WHY CAN’T I DO IT NOW?”

by Zaig on Apr 29, 2009 9:10 AM PDT up reply actions  

This is my point. Interesting that when Sheed does this it is considered a meltdown. Especially if his team doesn’t play well down the stretch, but when Battier does it it’s “working the refs”. If it was a smart move, wouldn’t it have helped his team down the stretch? Obviously Sheed would have gotten the T for the exact same reaction where Battier didn’t (another great example of the NBA reffing double standard).

Battier is a great pro, he does all the little things to help a team win and I’d take him on my team anytime. That said, I’m not sure he has lived up to his reputation of “total class guy”. I’m proud to see our inexperienced Blazers acting with class and composure even when some calls have not gone their way.

by 52therim on Apr 29, 2009 5:22 PM PDT up reply actions  

Battier always does that

He blows up and berates the refs about once a game. By all accounts, he’s one of the most likeable guys in the league, so I think they cut him some slack. That seemed like an obvious call though.

Even more obvious was Lowry taking Oden out like a bowling pin, and then crying about it like he got pushed. It may be because I’m a big Mike Conley fan (from the Ohio State days), but I still really really don’t like Lowry.

Q: Is Greg favoring his knee?
Frye: He favors dunking on your head, that's what he favors.

by KP Corleone on Apr 29, 2009 7:08 AM PDT up reply actions  

Didn't move at all?

They even showed a slow-motion instant replay right afterwards. Prz was moving the entire time. He’s been doing it all series. I won’t make a fuss about the refs, but this call wasn’t even close. No wonder Blazer fans have been whining about fouls, they don’t know one when they see one.

by professorjay on Apr 29, 2009 9:39 AM PDT up reply actions  

Battier just burried his face in Joel's chest

and tried to drive through the pick. Try and stand still for that!

by levelhed on Apr 29, 2009 10:28 AM PDT up reply actions  

Umm that's one person complaining, not the entire site

It was the “moving pick” call on Rudy that was ridiculous. Go watch the replay of that one and try and tell me that’s an offensive foul.

Also, Yao moves on just about every pick.

by Zaig on Apr 29, 2009 11:30 AM PDT up reply actions  

Look at that slow-mo one more time...

Prz has moved on some screens that weren’t called. So has Yao. They are not calling the moving pick in this series. On this play, Prz moved only as Battier drove right thru him. I didn’t say that Prz didn’t move. I said he didn’t move laterally. Watch it again professor. It wasn’t close, it was a foul (on Battier), YOU ARE FUSSING about the refs, and the Professor doesn’t recognize a foul when he sees it.

Seems like every point in your post was dead wrong! That sounds like whining to me!

by 52therim on Apr 29, 2009 6:13 PM PDT up reply actions  

Rick Kamla

I always saw him as a huge dork. Tonight, I found, I loved him as a call guy. I felt like he was for us but he never really was. He called the game straight up. I really respected that. That man should call every “big” game from here on out.

Hello Dum Dum

by ryryslyry on Apr 29, 2009 12:59 AM PDT reply actions  

I don't even think he was for us

He remarked he grew up as a Wolves fan if I got that right, and was mad about the Foye-Roy trade. Maybe he just loves Roy? But all in all I think the two called the game fair and good after I was initially disappointed to not get the Mikes for the big game of the year.

by Norsktroll on Apr 29, 2009 5:29 AM PDT up reply actions  

Big, big challenge to win in Houston.

Yao will get the calls. Can only hope he and Scola shoot cold and the Blazers all shoot hot. Chances for the Blazers winning the next two games? I’d give it about 15%.

No matter what happens, at least we made it a decent series. Stretching it to 6 or 7 games is respectful. Ya done good Blazers and you’re not even through playing yet.

Rip City!

Brandon Roy just destroyed everything in his path. There's your rational analysis -- Dave

Also: COMCAST SUCKS!

by TwoDeep on Apr 29, 2009 1:30 AM PDT reply actions  

rockets will be in good shape if aron brooks and ron artest stays in portland for game 6 and if a game 7 is needed, they need to return to houston immediately

by o_oholycrap on Apr 29, 2009 1:41 AM PDT up reply actions  

Haha

"...we have so many experts who think that you have to play defense, you have to rebound, you have to be a possession coach, you have to execute. I just laugh. Explosive offense is not as intimidating as dominant defense. But it is scary when you don't know how to stop someone." - George Karl, Nuggets coach

by jamon51 on Apr 29, 2009 11:13 AM PDT up reply actions  

Travis Outlaw was the only Blazers with a negative +/-

I can’t help but think that had he been traded for Tracy McGrady at the trade deadline, that the Blazers would be the team that leads 3-2 instead of Houston.

by tominhawaii on Apr 29, 2009 4:14 AM PDT reply actions  

Salaries don't match

But you can be sure the Rockets tried to trade Tracy for something, before he decided on his own to get microfracture immediately eliminating his value for the next year.

Have the basketball statistics gurus already decided if this series counts either way for or against TMac’s “never out of first round” record? The one he shares with Yao?

by Norsktroll on Apr 29, 2009 5:31 AM PDT up reply actions  

Of all people, I can't believe you were the one ....

… that Tom sucked in with his comment.

Nice job Tom. Hooked one of the big fish this time.

hakkaa päälle !

by timg56 on Apr 29, 2009 7:46 AM PDT up reply actions  

Sam Smith has done an excellent job ....

…. of convincing me he likes the sound of his own voice but doesn’t necessarily know what he is talking about.

hakkaa päälle !

by timg56 on Apr 29, 2009 1:05 PM PDT up reply actions  

I am proud

Of the way this game was played. Finally, we are seeing the Blazer basketball that earned us 54 wins this season!

I can’t talk today from screaming so much last night. The Rose Garden was insane.

Regarding BRoy:"Another day, another buzzer-beater. This man is so clutch he sets his body clock to go off one second before his alarm does every morning."

~Rob D from NBAmate

by twiggs on Apr 29, 2009 6:12 AM PDT reply actions  

I am debating whether or not I should watch game 6.

The only two games they’ve won have been the two on NBA-TV, which meant I couldn’t get them.

hakkaa päälle !

by timg56 on Apr 29, 2009 7:47 AM PDT reply actions  

As much as we'd like to blame you for the losses

We all know they are Nate and Outlaw’s fault.

by tominhawaii on Apr 29, 2009 8:49 AM PDT up reply actions   1 recs

don't forget

joe prunty for not making lamarcus unsoft enough

"The refs have caused a bird-pig flu pandemic"

by appel82 on Apr 29, 2009 9:00 AM PDT up reply actions  

I blame KGW and Comcast anyway

Tonight felt like the day you open the mail and receive an acceptance letter to your dream school: the University of Playoffs. - Ben Golliver, Apr 15 2009

by 22baylor on Apr 29, 2009 10:58 AM PDT up reply actions  

Dave...

Nicely written, I could feel your enthusiasm for this one!

I was particularly proud of Oden, when things didn’t go his way, he kept his head in the game and continued to make crucial plays that are not reflected in the box score.

Steve Smith was fun to listen too as well. He was just enjoying the fine play on both sides.

Let’s get another one!

    RoadBlazer

by Roadblazer on Apr 29, 2009 7:59 AM PDT reply actions  

Every Nate sub seemed to work

Even putting Joel in at the end got us a block. You go Sarge, you go with your bad self.

"The refs have caused a bird-pig flu pandemic"

by appel82 on Apr 29, 2009 8:46 AM PDT reply actions  

I want to mention officiating

This game illustrated exactly why I (and many many others) were griping about the calls. Two points….

1.the refs called a handful more calls on the Rockets on the outside grabbing and clutching….which in turn opened up the inside for the driving that everyone is raving about.
2. The refs didn’t ticky tac our centers out of the game in 1st, even though the down low battling wasn’t really any differently played. This allowed our rotations to remain intact.

Amazing what results you get when game is called better (not perfection …just better).

"You're welcome friend
I love you."
- Tom "Dragline" inHawaii

by 92wastheyear on Apr 29, 2009 9:05 AM PDT reply actions  

What a coincidence

Blazers fans whine about the foul discrepancies. Suddenly the Blazers win, have a 24-12 foul discrepancy in your favor, and now it’s a well called game. What hypocrites.

We (Rockets) lost last night. Sure I could point at a lot of fouls, but we lost because we played lousy. I won’t cry about the refs.

by professorjay on Apr 29, 2009 9:46 AM PDT up reply actions  

I mentioned 2 particular areas that I had problems with

never mentioned the foul discrepancy…one way or another. And said that it was better….not perfect

"You're welcome friend
I love you."
- Tom "Dragline" inHawaii

by 92wastheyear on Apr 29, 2009 10:01 AM PDT up reply actions  

You lost by 11

You better point at a WHOLE LOT of fouls.
We lost by 1 and by 3.

What I’m saying is that if the refs gave you guys 5 more fouls, we still win. If the refs gave us 5 bad fouls in games 3 or 4. We win.

by Zaig on Apr 29, 2009 11:32 AM PDT up reply actions  

NBA TV Announcers

I have to agree. Best I’ve heard the entire series.

I also liked the bold prediction at half time of blazers in seven. This is the first time I’ve seen teh blazers play BLAZER basketball this series. If they can remember how to do that in houston and again in portland, we have this series.

"Fernandez, to my eyes, is the Blazer who walks that walk most comfortably. A lot of Portland's fans (egged on, dare I say, by their local broadcasters) lament things like how Ron Artest or Yao Ming get to hit Brandon Roy's arms.

But I suspect Fernandez sees all that and thinks: We get to hit arms! Cool!"

http://myespn.go.com/blogs/truehoop/0-39-135/On-Playoff-Experience.html

by ratbastird on Apr 29, 2009 9:06 AM PDT reply actions  

The downside to the announcers...

was that they were in the studio and not at the game, which takes a lot away I think.

by erastus25 on Apr 29, 2009 10:50 AM PDT up reply actions  

The win last night

completes every item on my wish list for the Blazers this season:

  • 50 wins or more.
  • Make the playoffs.
  • Brandon an All-Star (with Rudy in the Slam-Dunk comp a nice bonus)
  • Greg does not require microfracture surgery anywhere on his person.
  • Top-four seed.
  • At least two wins in their first-round playoff series.
  • Shaq, Vince Carter, Richard Jefferson, Amar’e, Kirk Hinrich, and Jamal Tinsley not Blazers.

by MiledAnimal on Apr 29, 2009 9:43 AM PDT reply actions   1 recs

As nice of a player the Hinrich is ....

 … it is not overwhelminly apparent that he would be worth tying up that amount of dollars in salary.

It’s nothing against Hinrich. I think he’d be a nice fit as Portland’s starting PG. But I am also happy with Steve Blake in that position.

hakkaa päälle !

by timg56 on Apr 29, 2009 1:03 PM PDT up reply actions  

acquire kirk hinrich.

draft dejuan blair

Yao Ming: "Over time, [Oden] can even go beyond the Magic’s Howard."

Pelton: "Always love Hinrich’s D. Nobody on the Blazers (or most teams) gets into people like he does."

by Cablinasian on Apr 29, 2009 4:26 PM PDT up reply actions  

> Shaq, Vince Carter, Richard Jefferson, Amar’e, Kirk Hinrich, and Jamal Tinsley not Blazers.

ROFL and thank you – Elgin

Tonight felt like the day you open the mail and receive an acceptance letter to your dream school: the University of Playoffs. - Ben Golliver, Apr 15 2009

by 22baylor on Apr 29, 2009 11:00 AM PDT reply actions  

Listening to 95.5 this afternoon.

And one of those guys, Kenny Vance or Jay Allen said, “Brandon Roy is probably the biggest culprit in why the Blazers can’t push the tempo…it’s out of his comfort zone.”

Nice to hear some validation about what I’ve been talking about the whole series. Brandon is our best player, but in his pace and style of play, he really limits our ability to diversify our offense. And LMA also limits our ability to move the ball. Curious that our two “stars” are limiting us.

I guess it makes sense. To get the team to this level, they’ve had to carry a lot. But to get the team to the next level, they’re going to have to learn how to trust their teammates. Can they learn to play outside of their comfort zones? In Brandon’s case at least, I think so. But Nate is going to be the key to that.

Thinking long term. Our very conservative iso/post-up approach to offense might get it done if we have a great defense, and maybe that’s what Nate is about.

Strange though how in the press conferences, Nate talks about ball movement and tempo, but with some slight adjustments, we see the same BRoy ball. I don’t get that about Nate.

I guess only time will tell.

by Blazin' on Apr 29, 2009 2:06 PM PDT reply actions  

The point guards appeared

to handle the ball more in this game. That helped push the tempo.

To be fair, much of the time Brandon handles the ball is when the opposing defense is already down the floor and it’s apparent that there will be no early opportunities. You don’t see him handling it on the break and slowing it down.

—Dave

by Dave on Apr 29, 2009 2:20 PM PDT up reply actions  

its worth noting

that Nate’s last Sonics team, which reached the 2nd round and took the eventual champion Spurs to 6 games, were also a highly efficient— but very slow paced— offense. That’s the type of offense Nate coaches, and he has had a great deal of success with it. So, we have a coach who has had great success with slow paced offense, we have an elite halfcourt offense star in Roy, and we have a pair of elite offensive rebounders at C. Running occasionally would be nice, but it makes very little sense to turn this into an uptempo team, no matter what Nate says in his press conferences. Nate and Brandon are a perfect fit in terms of offense.

by jksnake99 on Apr 29, 2009 2:20 PM PDT up reply actions  

Yao has to be close to dead

In the enemy building, I would love to see some running.

Yao played 40+ minutes SEVEN times in the regular season.
Yao played 40+ minutes ZERO times in consecutive games in the regular season.

Even with the days off in between each time, this has to be getting to the giant. If we force him to go 40+ again tomorrow night, the advantage will be ours in a close fourth Q hopefully. (And that we already experience a couple close fourth quarters against them on the road, we only make the same mistake once!)

by Zaig on Apr 29, 2009 4:28 PM PDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

The ultimate coverage and analysis of the Portland Trail Blazers.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
The Blazers Future Regarding Free Agent Signings
Small
Thunderous Manboobies
Img_0878_1__small
Why do we hate LaMarcus Aldridge?
Small
Oregonlive "journalists" 2 new posts...same old drivel
2474796688_7cdc78828f_o_small
Greg Oden Suffers Life-Ending Injury; Gets 3-Year Extension

Recent FanPosts

Small
The Blazers' Future Regarding Trades
Small
WHAT TO DO WITH NIC BATUM BECAUSE WE WILL LOSE HIM IF NOT TRADED.
Small
Trade that helps us out now and the future
Small
How can the All-Star game be more fun and competitive?
Small
Earl Boykins!
Small
LaMarcus Aldridge about to become the 10th highest scorer in Blazers franchise  history
Small
New trade that gets us a new point and a three point shooter
Small
Portland getting.....
Small
The Sun Behind the Clouds: Blazers still on track.

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

FanShots

Quick hits of video, photos, quotes, chats, links and lists that you find around the web.

Recommended FanShots

It's pretty clear that the season is over already ;)
Double rainbow of sadness:

1) JBay is getting shorter
2) We never got to see him with a mustache

I miss you tiny raptor man.

via The Basketball Jones http://blogs.thescore.com/tbj/2012/02/09/things-of-note-for-february-9-2012/#more-34561
Blazers Broadcasters Mike Barrett and Mike Rice re-enacted NBA referee Scott Foster's controversial goaltending call on Portland Trail Blazers forward LaMarcus Aldridge, who was defending Oklahoma City Thunder All-Star forward Kevin Durant, during this week's edition of Blazers Courtside. Remarkably, no one was injured during the taping of this segment.

Original video of the play here. 
Quotes from the players and coaches here. 
The NBA admitting it got the call wrong here. 
Dave's  extended thoughts here. 
BlazersMakr's FanShot: Major Vegas action on OKC prior to tip here. 
Audio of Chad Doing of 750 AM The Game going HAM on Foster here.

OK, that should just about wrap up the goaltending discussion.

Courtside video via Blazers Broadcasting cameraman John Curry.

-- Ben Golliver | benjamin.golliver@gmail.com | Twitter
In 2008 Tim Donaghy indicated that Scott Foster was a ref that also fixed games
Blazers Owner Paul Allen Ranked No. 3 American Philanthropist In 2011

Recent FanShots

"You Must Be Known For Your Defense, Because You Definitely Stole My Heart"
Bill Simmons: Deron Williams To Dallas 'Is A Lock'
LaMarcus Aldridge Needs Support Around Him
LaMarcus Aldridge Finds Out He's An All-Star With His Teammates
Congratulations to Portland Trail Blazers forward LaMarcus Aldridge, on his first All Star selection.

As seen on www.trailblazers.com
AWoj: Aldridge an All Star
CRAZY stat from Houston game
NBA MVP Rankings... LMA @ #10

+ New FanShot All FanShots >


Editors

Kitten_small Dave

Headshotsmall_small Ben Golliver

Lead Moderators

Getfuzzy-satchel_small Timmay!

Bucky3_small Cablinasian

Authors

Plainlc_small Storyteller

Moderators

Lamb_small T Darkstar

Small douglast

Terryporter_small prezofdeath

Small usmcr3049

Lrg_magpie_small Corvid

Wallpaper_small geoffm