Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Knicks Beat Lakers With Familiar Strategy

Game 4 Recap: Rockets 89, Blazers 88

Well...we got our answers.

Boxscore

This was a close game, to be sure.  The Blazers played better than they did on Friday night.  They played a more complete game.  They played more Blazer basketball.  But they still did not control this game for 48 minutes or anything close.  They still did not rip this game off of its hinges and make it their own no matter what happened.  They still could not put together a complete effort.  Too many holes, too many mistakes, too many lost opportunities...that's the storyline here.  Any one of them could have won the game.  Any ONE.  But collectively they ended up costing us.

There's a way to sum this up neatly.  This team is talented.  This team is putting up a fight.  But this team is in over its collective heads right now and it shows.  The Blazers aren't collapsing or giving up, but they're hesitating in areas that are usually second nature to them.  They're not comfortable on the court against the Rockets.  They're not playing strong. 

The Rockets are comfortable.  They may not always be successful, but they're not rattled.  The Blazers are rattled by Yao Ming, by the refs, by the rebounds and threes given up, by the fortunate bounces on Houston shots, by the whole situation.  After all is said and done the epitaph on this series will almost certainly be that the Blazers were just too young and inexperienced to take advantage of an opportunity that was right there before them.

The first quarter of this game looked eerily similar to first quarters past in the series, which was not a good thing for Portland.  It needed to be wholly different for the Blazers tonight.  It only was for the first five minutes or so.  Of Portland's first 11 shots, ZERO were closer than 10 feet.  The difference was that the Blazers made 5 of their first 6 because they moved the ball for those jumpers instead of working just one or two men to get them.  After a couple early buckets the Rockets started missing.  Brooks and Scola bricked shots they had been hitting earlier.  Portland got out to an 11-4 lead.

Unfortunately the lead wasn't sustainable.  Halfway through the quarter with the Blazers up 13-6 Ron Artest had the ball with the shot clock expiring.  He ducked under LaMarcus Aldridge and heaved a 30-footer which went through.  On the next Houston play Artest missed another three but Battier grabbed the board and put it back in.  Then the Blazers turned it over.  The Rockets didn't score off of that turnover but you could feel the momentum shift.  All of a sudden Portland's shots weren't falling anymore.  They weren't getting better ones either. 

Houston was dominating in two stats that have repeatedly killed the Blazers.  The Rockets got offensive rebounds followed by second-chance points.  The Rockets also went to the free throw line.  The Blazers drew ZERO foul shots in the first quarter. For those counting, the Blazers have shot a total of 6 first-quarter free throws in this series, all coming in Game 2.  This is the third time in four games that Portland has not been awarded a single foul shot in the opening period.  None.  Zero.  I'm not sure what the probability is of that happening, or whether it's ever happened, but it's rare.

Another continuing theme was that our centers got racked up in the first quarter with fouls.  Joel Przybilla is a first-quarter foul magnet in this series and quickly drew two tonight.  Greg Oden followed suit.  The puzzling part was that these fouls were for the most part not drawn on the inside defending the post, but on seemingly routine contact well out on the floor...the normal jostling for position.  The refs have clearly sent a message to the Blazers in these games that we cannot guard Yao straight up.  The Blazers have had to adjust and for the most part have done a good job.  But the extra men needed have siphoned off coverage defensively and on the defensive boards.  I am not suggesting that the officials cost us this game.  I am explaining that this is part of the reason you're seeing an otherwise excellent rebounding team look impotent early.  This is also why you're seeing the Rockets get early production, especially from their non-stars.

Again...I am not suggesting that the refs took this game away.  The Blazers still could have won, as we'll see.  In fact I was actually quite discouraged to hear the Rockets' fans booing every call that went against them tonight, even when most came off of Portland drives, as if the refs alone were responsible for their struggles and the Blazers had nothing to do with it.  I would suggest that Portland fans not duplicate that tendency, even in the face of a loss.  Save your ire for the calls that matter.  You might, for instance, rewind your DVR's to 4:03 left in the first when Yao Ming was defending Greg Oden in the post and reached around to poke away a turnover.  In real time it looked like an obvious foul.  If you go frame-by-frame it's unclear whether Yao's hand made contact with the ball.  It is quite clear that before he had a chance he wiped out Oden's elbow and arm.  Four fouls on Blazer centers, none on Yao in the period.  Or you might look at Luis Scola's shot with 3:09 left in the first.  In real time it looked like a shot-clock violation.  Frame-by-frame confirms this.  The bucket was allowed in an eventual 1-point game.

In any case, experienced teams know that this is a real possibility, especially on the road, especially in the playoffs.  They know how to react.  They know how to adjust.  They know how to intensify their game.  The Blazers, on the other hand, tend to go into an extended funk.  They actively avoid contact instead of seeking it on the offensive end, assuming no fouls are coming their way.  The defensive end actually stays more solid, but having to jimmy lineups to compensate for the foul trouble takes its toll.  The Blazers went into less of a tailspin tonight, but they still ended up stalling for the better part of 10 minutes in the late first and early second.  Eventual one-point game...every one of those possessions is precious.  An opportunity was lost--not by the refs, who are somewhat of a given--but by the Blazers.  The road was a little longer tonight than it should have been?  So what.  Walk it.  You don't have a choice.  You need the win.

After going down by double-digits again the Blazers fought harder towards the end of the first half.  They started forcing Houston turnovers, rectified the rebounding situation, and Brandon Roy started driving, hitting, and drawing fouls.  Travis Outlaw came alive for a brief, glimmering moment, hitting a couple shots off of the loosened defense caused by Brandon.  The Blazers also did well keeping the offense away from Yao.  The edge in the quarter--two points--was more symbolic than effective, but it was a symbol the Blazers desperately needed.

It was also during the second quarter that Ron Artest mugged to the crowd, doing Hulk Hogan poses after a made layup, an act every bit as irritating as the Kevin Garnett all-fours move in the game in Boston this year.  If for nothing else than that I wish the Blazers would have won the game...to remind a guy who went 5-20 on the evening that you don't show up an opponent until after you've won.  I wish Portland's intensity following the move would have kept up for the remainder of the game.  As it turned out it was only most of it.

The third quarter was Blazer time.  The period started rough, with guys missing makeable shots.  But all of a sudden Portland started forcing turnovers, pushing tempo, rebounding, and hitting.  Roy, Aldridge, and Blake were the main scorers.  The triple-punch had the Rockets' defense unable to set.  The defense at the other end swarmed.  We saw a litany of blocked shots.  We saw fire, heart, and talent.  A 26-14 quarter put Portland up 6 going into the fourth, an exact reversal of the halftime deficit.  One more quarter would do it.

The Blazers did manage to hang on through the first half of the fourth quarter.  It was good that the Rockets were not able to overwhelm them.  The Blazers were still fairly aggressive on offense and were still getting to the line as well as making shots.  Houston fans were still booing every call.  As I said, I don't suggest that Portland fans do that, as it makes you look silly.  Save your ire for the calls that matter.  If you rewind your DVR to 11:32 left in the fourth where Yao is up top setting a screen for a shooter, perhaps you could tell me how what he did is not called a moving pick...or for that matter on any of the high screens he set in the quarter.  (There's another one on the very next possession if you care.)   He's 7'6" tall.  You wouldn't think a person could miss that.  But, you know, had the Rockets lost it would have been the officials' fault.  Not so with the Blazers, as we are about to see.

Remember how we said that rebounding AND free throws were the keys to much of this series?  Well the Blazers played the Rockets pretty equally on the free throw line in the fourth.  But Portland gave up 10 (possibly 11 by the official count) offensive rebounds in the fourth quarter.  Not in the game...in the fourth quarter.  The scrambling, aggressive defense generated misses, but there wasn't enough support to rebound the ball.  Any time there was a tie the Rockets ended up with the ball.  A defense can only expend energy so long before open shots start flying and connecting.  The Blazers didn't give up, they just lost their bearings on the boards.  You started getting a sense of nervousness about misses instead of elation.

Then the Blazers committed some basic mistakes under pressure situations.  Steve Blake, who had played a pretty solid game thus far, was responsible for two of them.  He made a treacherous pass to an out-of-position Roy on the break that drew an offensive foul against Brandon because of momentum.  He also got his pocket picked from behind on a Blazer break.  Joel Przybilla played the hero by grabbing an offensive rebound (For Portland!  Yay!) off of a Blake miss with 42 seconds to go and the Blazers down 2 needing a hoop.  He immediately turned into the goat by looping an errant pass over the heads of his guards and clear into the backcourt for a violation.  I point these out not to bag on these particular players, but to point out that if you're going to look for one play that makes a difference in a 1-point game you can't look at the non-called shot-clock violation against Scola alone.  I also point out these plays because Blake and Przybilla are our steady veterans...the guys we rely upon to calm us and make the right plays.  When these two are on edge and having head issues, you know the whole team is out of sorts.

The take-away point here may well be that it's amazing the Blazers could hang that close and make this a game while playing under that much duress and distress.  You need not give up on these guys.  I'm not sure they'll need another year of playoff experience to figure out what's up here.  It's pretty plain that the comfort/poise factor is a big reason why the edge is going to Houston right now.  It's just as plain that the Blazers won't be eager to repeat that experience.  You may see an entirely different team come into next regular season than you did this year.

In any case, the turnovers and lost rebounds ended up hamstringing an otherwise valiant offensive and defensive effort for the Blazers in the quarter.  After LaMarcus Aldridge hit 2 free throws to draw Portland to 85-87 with 2:15 to play the Blazers' offensive possessions looked like this:

  • The aforementioned Blake turnover
  • Blake misses a 22-footer
  • The aforementioned Przybilla offensive rebound and sailing pass
  • Brandon Roy offensive foul on the drive
  • Outlaw misses a 26-footer to tie
  • Rudy Fernandez hits a three to draw the Blazers within 1, the final points of the game

That's 3 turnovers and 2 missed long shots followed by a Rudy three.  That's not a textbook recipe for finishing a close game.

Why did the Blazers lose this game?  They weren't ready to win this game.  That's the long and short of it. 

This is what it looks like when a team loses in the playoffs, by the way.  These are good teams.  Seldom do you see a huge sign saying, "This team is not going to win it!"  It often hangs on a missed shot here, a turnover there, a single rebound left unsecured.  That one mistake seems like a tantalizingly close thing, but that one mistake is always there.  It's just a matter of which team makes it.  In this series it's been Portland consistently.

Brandon Roy had a great game, scoring 31 on 13-13 foul shots and 8-17 from the field.  He had 5 rebounds, 5 assists, 3 steals, 3 blocks, and 4 turnovers.  LaMarcus Aldridge also went 8-17 but he only had 3 free throws for 19 total points with 10 boards.  Joel Przybilla played well tonight against Yao and added 12 rebounds.  Steve Blake did a good job defensively tonight and had 11 points and 8 assists and only the 1 turnover.  This was his best game of the series overall I think.  Travis had 14 points and some nice hustle.  He missed some shots he normally hits blind and it's hard not to think about that in a close game.  Rudy had 5 points and 4 rebounds and also played with energy.  Greg didn't really get off the launching pad tonight, drawing 5 fouls in 11 minutes but he played solidly.

So now it's back to Portland.  As improbable as winning the series seems, the 1-win team often bows out in these situations, swamped by the energy of the clinchers-to-be.  It would be valuable for Portland to buck that trend precisely because the win would have as much to do with them overcoming some of the issues that have plagued them this series as with being back at home.

You can find today's Gameday Threads here.

The Jersey Contest playoff scores looked like this tonight:

  • Sir-1 68, Total 204
  • MavetheGreat 71, Total = 175
  • FromAfar 35, Total = 168
  • Tweener 50, Total = 159

We're having a special form for Game 5.  The score predictions remain as usual but all four of the bonus questions are the same:  Will the Blazers win, yes or no?  Each question is worth 10 points.  The participants are, in effect, wagering points based on how secure they are about the Blazers winning.  If they're sure the Blazers will win they can put "yes" four times and try to collect all 40 points.  If they're sure they will lose, the opposite.  Or they can hedge and put two "yes" and two "no" answers (collecting a sure 20 points but losing the chance for more) or split it 3-1.  We'll see who's confident and who is not, plus who is protecting a lead and who is trying for the miracle comeback.  Any one of the games from now on could be the last game of the season.  After that happens, the game-worn jersey of Rudy Fernandez will be awarded to the winner.

Cheery thoughts and good wishes for Tuesday.

--Dave (blazersub@yahoo.com)

Comment 197 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

I've been waiting for this,

I’ve desperately needed some perspective. Right now I venomously hate Blake, but hopefully after I read this I’ll feel better. Next year will be great. Let’s hope we can pull out the upset this series first though.

it's not likely at all that we will win, but I've followed this team all season and I'm not giving up an inch until the Rockets pry every living breath out of my soul
- trailblazersfan

by Screen Name on Apr 27, 2009 12:41 AM PDT reply actions  

I feel like crying.

OH! IT'S A LOB TO RUDY!! And he Jams it!
From Sergio; the Spanish Armada hooks up again!

by Portland89 on Apr 27, 2009 12:41 AM PDT reply actions  

It hurts so bad

"Ooo la la! The Blazers are le chic, no?"

by SabonisBonus on Apr 27, 2009 12:42 AM PDT reply actions  

awesome recap, so many great points

I liked it all except the part about experience. The Blazers are good enough to win games like this and they are ready for it. They know how to rebound. They just didn’t. Note how Blake, our most experienced playoff performer, made 2 of the key mistakes (very good all around game by him, incidentally). This was one of those tossup games, and it went to Houston… because of execution and a couple breaks, not experience.

by jksnake99 on Apr 27, 2009 12:45 AM PDT reply actions  

You're right it's because of execution and a couple breaks

(in fact before I saw your comment I edited in a paragraph about playoff games coming down to exactly that…a couple breaks) but you have to ask the question WHY Portland is having these execution issues when, as you say, they are more than capable of executing and have shown themselves so. Part of it is the Houston matchup. But I think it’s been shown the Blazers can overcome the talent level or mismatches alone. In fact they’re doing a heck of a job compensating for Houston’s stars. The WHY is simply this: they’re not executing smoothly because they are not comfortable. They’re thinking instead of playing, reacting instead of anticipating, and they’re simply blowing a few critical possessions in mind-numbingly awful ways…the kind of thing you don’t see good high school teams do much. They didn’t just turn stupid or inept. This is not their natural mode. They’re just not in their comfort zone. And why are they not in their comfort zone? Because they have not…been in…this…situation…before. Houston has. Six times. They are not getting rattled no matter what. That’s not because they’re that much of a better team. It’s because they know how to do this.

Experience disparity is exactly what’s going on here, translated through execution and those “breaks”. That’s how bad execution and bad breaks happen.

—Dave

by Dave on Apr 27, 2009 12:54 AM PDT up reply actions   2 recs

The good news?

You’re not going to see this next year. At least not like this.

Maybe in the first trip to the Conference Finals or NBA Finals.

Of course if that’s next year… Hmmm.

—Dave

by Dave on Apr 27, 2009 12:56 AM PDT up reply actions  

Great minds think alike

I posted “Agreed” below before reading your “The good news.” First round loss or not, the Blazers won’t be beaten by the likes of the Rockets again next season (barring serious injuries, of course).

"We don't back down to nobody." --Joel Przybilla

by hurryup09 on Apr 27, 2009 2:13 AM PDT up reply actions  

Sounds Like Aldridge to me....Always hesitating

Me and my friends have this ongoiing discussion about how LMA is not a gamer, how in the 4th he disappears. I swear he hasnt made a really big shot since that MIL game last year. He is always hesitant and that hurts the Blazers with no Number 2 option. To be an all-star you gotta play like one in the 4th

"Grayg"
-Nate

by OSUBlazerfan on Apr 27, 2009 12:57 AM PDT up reply actions  

LaMarcus' tendency

to need 2 seconds before making any move is definitely hurting him in this series.

—Dave

by Dave on Apr 27, 2009 12:58 AM PDT up reply actions  

Yep,

giving the defender time to anticipate which of his three moves he’s gonna use and its over. I think he goes to work on his game this off season and hopefully next year we see a different LMA.

by lethaldose on Apr 27, 2009 1:19 AM PDT up reply actions  

LMA needs to get lots better at putting the ball on the floor and driving

And I’ll be shocked if we don’t see that improvement over the summer. When gifted, hardworking, determined players like LMA have a bad postseason, it’s bad news for the rest of the league.

"We don't back down to nobody." --Joel Przybilla

by hurryup09 on Apr 27, 2009 2:15 AM PDT up reply actions  

LA needs to start beating Scola to his spot

the guy is shooting at his own leisure. He runs to the top of the free throw line and is just spotting up and nailing his shot. LA has got to move him out a couple feet or at least get a hand up in his face.

I try to help with everything," Fernandez said. "If the coach says go rebound, I go rebound. I work for the team.

""If I'm playing this game to get media and attention, I shouldn't be here," Aldridge said. "I'm here to play basketball, and do what I can do to help this team win."

His stare became blank. It was apparent he was back in that place, on the Rose Garden's logo, picking up Aaron Brooks as the crowd nervously roared.

by Dragonage on Apr 27, 2009 8:31 AM PDT up reply actions  

I absolutely agree with this

And it kills me, because every game since Game 1, I’ve anticipated us coming out and playing with that kind of composure and confident attitude. I’ve been waiting for it to “click” because I saw it so many times at the end of the season.

I believe that we’re better than these guys, but their execution has just been phenomenal. All of their players are taking shots that they are expecting to hit, and they are. I don’t believe that Von Wafer and Aaron Brooks and Kyle Lowry are All-Stars, but they’ve been playing like they believe they are, as have other players.

The funny thing is, I’m not even that depressed about the team right now. I still like our players, still know that they’re going out and playing with heart…they just need that little piece of confidence to go out, run, and press the talent advantage that they have. As your post has made me realize, that might have to be next year (but I hope that it’s not).

It’s been interesting watching all of the “Where Amazing Happens” commercials during this series, because they’re chock-full of guys who aren’t just making big plays, but who are clearly EXPECTING to make those plays and are fired up about it. When our guys have been hitting shots, it’s been all business and no fun. When anybody, including Brandon, has made a big play, there’s no elation, no swagger…their faces have just said “Good, now we need to do that more”.

Here’s hoping that having our backs up against that final wall, playing at home, gets us fired up, playing loose, running the floor, and taking shots with the expectation that they’re going in. Here’s hoping that we look like we’re having a little fun again.

by Blaz on Apr 27, 2009 1:08 AM PDT up reply actions  

I should say

As I re-read this it’s coming across more emphatic than I meant it to. I don’t mean point-emphatic…I’m obviously emphasizing the point I’m trying to make. I mean tone-emphatic. It’s late and I haven’t had much sleep so my typing tone is off. No offense meant to JK.

—Dave

by Dave on Apr 27, 2009 1:11 AM PDT up reply actions  

Agreed

This time next season—even without personnel changes—the Blazers won’t be deer-in-the-headlights anymore. Plus, because the team is made up of extremely young players who work to improve during the offseason, the team will be flat better.

So, for what it’s worth, let’s get real: the Blazers will mop the floor with the Rockets if they meet them again next season. We won’t be agonizing about a play here and a play there, because the games won’t be close enough for that to matter.

My concern is that, should this series end with Game 5, the Blazers won’t have obtained enough playoff experience in this offseason to take a realistic shot at the Lakers, Cavs, et all next year. That’s why I think Game 5 is so important. If the Blazers can kick tail in that game, then at least battle in Game 6, they’ll have a leg up towards contention in ‘09-’10.

"We don't back down to nobody." --Joel Przybilla

by hurryup09 on Apr 27, 2009 2:11 AM PDT up reply actions  

Don't get ahead of yourself

I am a Rocket fan but I can say that i am very impressed with the Blazers. That being said they will not mop the floor with the Rockets until one thing happens in my opinion. Greg Oden is key for your team. He has impressive strength and if he can learn to use that on the offensive end ala Shaq well, chaulk up a championship. Get someone to work with him that had skills similar to what he can have. Besides the obvious (shaq) Patrick Ewing would be good.

by Lance1428 on Apr 27, 2009 9:16 AM PDT up reply actions  

again

there is no evidence that experience matters more in the playoffs than in the regular season. As much as we would like to believe that there is, its just not the case. Sorry.

by jksnake99 on Apr 27, 2009 8:48 AM PDT up reply actions  

Game 1 was evidence

I often agree with you on relying on studies and the like, over observation, but you don’t need a statistical significance test to understand the gooseegg the Blazers brought to the table in game 1.

The unfortunate thing is, the Blazers inexperience probably wouldn’t have mattered against the Spurs or the Hornets – just like it didn’t matter for New Orleans last year until they ran into San Antonio. That’s why the studies are misleading on this point.

If there’s a huge talent disparity, experience will not trump that. But when things are close, and there’s a more narrow gap, experience allows a slightly less talented team (like Houston) to close the gap and prevail more often than not.

Bad draw for the Blazers, but it will make them tougher in the long run.

Q: Is Greg favoring his knee?
Frye: He favors dunking on your head, that's what he favors.

by KP Corleone on Apr 27, 2009 8:53 AM PDT up reply actions  

Even if it didn't matter in games 2-4

It did in game 1, which cost us home court, which might cost us the series.

by Zaig on Apr 27, 2009 8:55 AM PDT up reply actions  

True to a point

I think the beginning of the game hurt them badly, being unprepared, crappy calls, whatever. But I think unlike expecting to make a comeback like they usually do, the Blazers felt defeated. “So this is how we do in the playoffs” type of feeling.

I no longer think this is an issue, as we made comebacks in games 2-4. Those games were more an issue of reffing, our big men issues, and trash rebounding.

by Zaig on Apr 27, 2009 1:13 PM PDT up reply actions  

Experience matters

When it comes to the officiating. Whether or not it’s good or bad, it’s definitely not the same officiating we saw during the regular season.

In the regular season at Houston we were awarded free throws. In the playoffs, not so much.

by levelhed on Apr 27, 2009 9:13 AM PDT up reply actions  

Blake made several poor plays in the 4th

I was really hoping that Nate would pull Blake and put Rudy in for the last 3-4 minutes of the game, but Nate is as stubborn as they come.

Blake blew several defensive covers, couldn’t keep Lowery out of the paint, and couldn’t keep him from grabbing a key offensive rebound. On the offensive end, his only strength is bombing from the outside – which is really what this team has waaaaaaaay too much of.

Of course Blake had company in the “give the game away” category, but overall he has not really helped this team in the playoffs.

by ralphzillo on Apr 27, 2009 9:37 AM PDT up reply actions  

This game

Thank you for the recap. I am glad to hear that we really did get screwed over by the refs. The fact of the matter is, we made mistakes. Even with those mistakes, we lost by ONE point.

If the referees use there eyes and brains for once, we win the game. I am not saying if they had taken that basket back we would have won or the game would have gone differently. Who knows, that is just speculation. But i do know that we lost by ONE POINT. How many points did they give Scola for his shot?? two? yes. HIs shot didnt count how can the referees not check that?? they checked to see if Roy’s shot was a three later in the game. But they can’t use it to check a shot clock violation??

due to bad calls by one ref, gred and joel both had two fouls in the first quarter? they shot 9 FTs in the first and we shot 0. we had 11 fouls, they had 2. that is not our fault?? the refs do make a difference.

when u have a 7 point lead and the refs give the other team 9 free throws and you 0. that makes a difference. than they dont recall the scola shot clock violation?? pure stupidityy by the refs.

We did give away SEVERAL chances to retake the lead and hold the lead which we did not capitalize on, but as before, several of those turnovers were in the lane, getting hacked, or bad offensive foul calls on us. AFTER all that we still give rudy a three and he drains it. than we cant ge a last shot off in 1.2 seconds. a fast 1.2 if u ask me?? all im saying is, if we cant get calls to go both ways and be consistent than we will have a hard time winning. no matter how good we play. game 2 is a prime example of a good win in which the game did not get completely maninuplated by the refs.

by Booha21 on Apr 27, 2009 3:51 PM PDT up reply actions  

I haven't had such a sorrow filled feeling

since the 2000 WCF…….why, why. why, why is it going to end…….Tear

"Grayg"
-Nate

by OSUBlazerfan on Apr 27, 2009 12:50 AM PDT reply actions  

that was way, way worse than this

I feel about like I did after we lost game 3 of the Dallas series the last time we were in the playoffs.

by jksnake99 on Apr 27, 2009 12:51 AM PDT up reply actions  

But that team wasn't that great

I had no expectations. This team is great and i swear if we could have gotten past these darn rockets we could have given LA a fight in 7 games

"Grayg"
-Nate

by OSUBlazerfan on Apr 27, 2009 12:54 AM PDT up reply actions  

Hey Dave

how happy are you to be able to write about playoff games involving the Blazers?

Hello Dum Dum

by ryryslyry on Apr 27, 2009 12:56 AM PDT reply actions  

Wow. The whole post just focused on the missed calls in favor of Houston.

Ridiculous. There are always calls which will go both ways.

by VBG on Apr 27, 2009 12:57 AM PDT reply actions  

Which of the missed calls do you disagree with?

"its tough to play with one eye, unless you're a pirate." Delonte West
"una canasta a Pau en la cara" Rudy

by Honka Playboy on Apr 27, 2009 1:01 AM PDT up reply actions  

Absolutely none. But I don’t like how most of the recap is focused on missed calls. It’s part of the game. Yao’s been getting terrible calls throughout the series as well. But basing the whole review on calls is something I don’t agree with.

by VBG on Apr 27, 2009 6:08 AM PDT up reply actions  

Yao's been getting terrible calls.... sigh

"its tough to play with one eye, unless you're a pirate." Delonte West
"una canasta a Pau en la cara" Rudy

by Honka Playboy on Apr 27, 2009 7:05 AM PDT up reply actions  

The League has "Special Rules" for Yao

Since Yao represents a huge market potential for the NBA- namely 10s of Millions of Chinese – the refs know that he is NOT to be called for anything other than the most obvious fouls.

The NBA is about money and has been trying to get more interest internationally. Yao is the cornerstone of the Asian Cash Cow.

Oh wait – we are all supposed to pretend that ethics and the purity of the game are more important than money. NOT!

by ralphzillo on Apr 27, 2009 9:43 AM PDT up reply actions  

you are delusional

If they called all the fouls against Yao that are committed when he has the ball (i.e., Oden and Przy immediately putting two hands in his back), Yao would shoot FTs forever.

on defense, Yao has been called for ticky-tack fouls his whole career. He finally got clarification on “jumping straight up” from Stern around the all-star break this year, and he’s been doing just that – jump straight up with arms up high and do not “slap down” at the ball at all. Once you move your arms down… immediate foul.

And after Roy got to shoot free throws when he ran into Yao on the baseline yesterday… that was awful.

by grungedave on Apr 27, 2009 10:05 AM PDT up reply actions  

I think we understand why Oden collects fouls like a madman, but Joel is usually not prone to fouls (anymore)

2.6 fouls per game this season. Against Houston he collects 4, which is the most against any team. Now in the playoffs its 4.25. Are you allowed to defend Yao any way after he has caught the ball?

by Norsktroll on Apr 27, 2009 10:12 AM PDT up reply actions  

I asked this during the game thread

Based on the foul calls, I really have a legit question: What is an acceptable way to guard Yao? No matter what you do on defense, you’re called for a foul.

by Timmay! on Apr 27, 2009 1:34 PM PDT up reply actions  

Yao thrust his hip into Roy

draft dejuan blair

Yao Ming: "Over time, [Oden] can even go beyond the Magic’s Howard."

Pelton: "Always love Hinrich’s D. Nobody on the Blazers (or most teams) gets into people like he does."

by Cablinasian on Apr 27, 2009 12:05 PM PDT up reply actions  

What? Yao's 1 foul was terrible?

Or are you talking when Artest and Yao both fouled him and they called it on Battier?

by Zaig on Apr 27, 2009 1:14 PM PDT up reply actions  

the whole reveiw is not based on bad calls

and if you actually read the whole thing you’d realize that.

by appel82 on Apr 27, 2009 7:31 AM PDT up reply actions  

then don't come and read it

and if you don’t like it, then don’t come and complain about it. cool rockets fans = welcome. rockets fans who come and bitch about the recap on ANOTHER TEAM’S BLOG = don’t let the door hit you in the ass on the way out.

The Michael Ruffin of BlazersEdge, cuz Amlmart said so.

by BlazersOrBust on Apr 27, 2009 7:32 AM PDT up reply actions  

+ 1

       It’s one of the reasons I stay off the forum this time of
year. As a Blazermaniac I detest two things:
1. Immature opponent team trolls who name call and whine.
2. Immature Blazer bandwagon fans who have minimal understanding
    of the game. (lack of understanding – never coached or actually played)

    GO BLAZERS !! KGW RULES !!! D UP & HIT THE BOARDS !!!

It's GO time !

by walkoff41 on Apr 27, 2009 1:43 PM PDT up reply actions  

Dude seriously

Yao has been getting a huge advantage in the calls.

Go make a video of Oden/Przybilla fouls compared to Yao fouls. At very least 3 of Oden’s 5 fouls last night were phantom fouls, including that block in the 4th quarter. Meanwhile, Yao is jumping in the key and bumping Roy every game, and when they blow the whistle, the call is on Battier somehow.

If anyone has been getting bad calls on your team, it’s Battier, of course… that’s because anytime they do blow a whistle on Yao, they give the foul to Batty instead.

by Zaig on Apr 27, 2009 8:41 AM PDT up reply actions  

Thank you.

The biggest problem with the officiating is that Yao is not getting charged with fouls that obviously should go against him. That includes calls that Oden’s been tagged with all year: not keeping his arms completely straight and getting guys with the body.

Battier was ten feet away from the play when he raised his hand and got the foul charged to him. WTF?!

Meanwhile the same rookie official whistles Oden and Pryz for trying to hold their ground. He made those calls from half court. Can he even see that far.

I saw one instance in which Yao was obviously pushed and didn’t get the call. It was Frye though, not Oden or Pryz.

If a ref can’t read “Spalding” on the ball from his vantage point, he shouldn’t be making calls that are supposed to be made from under the basket.

by Benjamanic on Apr 27, 2009 9:21 AM PDT up reply actions  

I didn't read it that way.

I read it as the Blazers not being ready for how the playoffs differ. If they don’t get a break they wanted, be it a call that could go either way, a missed shot that just rimmed out, whatever…. they’re not responding because they aren’t ready. Fact is, home teams, aggressive teams and big-name stars are all more likely to get calls. The Blazers have to overcome challenges such as this to prove they deserve it. All teams have to work through that, it’s just the way it is.

by ericande on Apr 27, 2009 9:33 AM PDT up reply actions  

nice recap

rockets fan here. well, this win was way too much for my nerves. i’m just glad that the rockets were able to get all those second-chance pts. as far as the blazers go, you guys have a very talented young team. i’d be really worried if we run into you guys again.

also, this may sound pessimistic (after all, i’ve witnessed the 1st round exits for 6 straight times), the rockets have been here before several times where all they needed was to win one to clinch the series. i’m not ready to look towards LA yet. And if my memory serves me right, didn’t u guys come back from a 0-3 deficit only to lose game 7 to the Mavs? I think that was the series where Mo Cheeks helped out that little girl with the national anthem.

May the best team win on Tuesday!

by airchina23 on Apr 27, 2009 12:58 AM PDT reply actions  

Thanks

I appreciate this about the Rockets in the series: they have never, ever lost control. They’ve had bad stretches. They’ve been overtaken. They’ve even been taken out of what they want to do by the Blazers. But you’ve never had a sense of Portland taking over a game from them. They know what they’re doing. They’re doing it well. They’re not going to give the Blazers an inch.

If nothing else, this is a good lesson for Portland on what it takes to win.

I think Portland will manage to win Game 5. That’s not just homer-ism, rather an assertion that this isn’t the type of team to fold it up even down 3-1. If the Blazers can win then Game 6 should be exciting.

—Dave

by Dave on Apr 27, 2009 1:03 AM PDT up reply actions  

The key to these close games was that the Rockets set the tone early

The Rockets set the tone early in game 1, and that has carried over. Even though the Blazers have been playing with equal talent and heart, the message that the Rockets sent in game 1 is still lurking the back of everyone’s minds, which is why Rockets have ended up on the longer end of these close games. No worries though.

Two years ago, the Lakers were up 3-1 against the Suns, after Kobe had hit a game-winning shot at home. The Suns went on to win games 5,6,7 and stunned the Lakers. So don’t count the series over yet.

by laker on Apr 27, 2009 4:05 AM PDT up reply actions  

Series isn't over yet!

1 game at a time.

I miss Martell. Come back soon!

by mannyfresh1 on Apr 27, 2009 1:00 AM PDT reply actions  

The Body Bulding Pose was nice

because it brought on a replay were you could easily see him changing pivot feet.

"its tough to play with one eye, unless you're a pirate." Delonte West
"una canasta a Pau en la cara" Rudy

by Honka Playboy on Apr 27, 2009 1:00 AM PDT reply actions  

They missed A LOT of travels

Guess “playoff basketball” includes being able to walk if you want.

by Zaig on Apr 27, 2009 8:42 AM PDT up reply actions  

It's even in that NBA ad with Joe Johnson.

He drives across the lane, takes three steps, and hits the shot.

The NBA, where amazing no-calls happen.

by MiledAnimal on Apr 27, 2009 2:24 PM PDT up reply actions  

I couldn't agree more...

the Blazers cost themselves the game, and their lack of execution down the stretch is the reason for the loss. But I still turned off the tv unsettled with the role the refs took in the game. I’m no conspiracy theorist, but I still can’t wrap my head around the early game disparity in off-the-ball fouls that dictated the Blazer’s defensive tone early.

Would Portland have won had calls gone differently and GO and Joel allowed to establish position early in the game? Who knows. But as much as it hurts when we lose, and it does, the eventual satisfaction that comes from watching your team grow because of a close loss shouldn’t be tainted by thoughts that officiating played a role in that experience and that’s the taste I’m left with tonight.

That being said, can’t wait for Game 5.

by Burk on Apr 27, 2009 1:09 AM PDT reply actions  

I agree also

I agree with Burk that the role of officiating tainted the game after a one point loss. One ref calling 5 fouls from midcourt on Joel and GO in the first quarter changed the flow of the game. The Blazers were doing well until Joel had to go to the bench with 2 fouls. That and later Scola’s shot maybe not counting make a big difference in a one point game.

I also agree with Dave that a few of the Blazers looked like they were playing outside their comfort zone, Travis and especially Nic. That said, the team seems to be growing with every game. Even being on the road with inconsistent officiating against the team that’s the worst match up, the Blazers just about battled the Rockets evenly in both games.

by jayfisher on Apr 27, 2009 4:26 AM PDT up reply actions  

As usual Excellent Analysis BUT...

“After all is said and done the epitaph on this series will almost certainly be that the Blazers were just too young and inexperienced to take advantage of an opportunity that was right there before them.”

  Sure there’s a slab of Marble, a guy with a chisle, and hooded fellow in black robes lurking around, but could we hold off on the epitaph talk? (shh…you might even be 100% right but I just don’t want to talk about an epitaph until something has died…and we still have a game in Portland) I’m hoping we are too young and inexperienced to know how hard coming back from 3-1 is, and that now that we have our backs against the collective wall we might be at the point where being a inexperienced Playoff team might actually be kind of an advantage. I’m really hoping this team doesn’t realize that some people are writing their playoff epitaphs. I want a “Christmas Carol” like redemption. Let’s get visited by the Blazer spirits of a game 5 win, a Game 6 Win and finally a game 7 win. Why not?

"Mother Nature started this fight, I think it's about time we ended it!"

by Krang on Apr 27, 2009 1:09 AM PDT reply actions  

I believe that's possible

It’s a big longshot now, though, and not just because of the percentages. If the Blazers had shown any indication of wresting this series from the Rockets you have to believe it would have come before now. If they DO do it now I’m almost going to be upset at them. What the heck were you waiting for?!? Procrastination like that is uncool and gives us all gray hairs. In any case, I don’t think Houston is going to let this series go for three game straight.

I think what would have to happen is a super-convincing win on Tuesday…an utter destruction of the stripe seen against the L*kers and Nuggets at the end of the regular season. That could maybe be followed by a squeak-out win in Game 6 and then momentum is our friend into Game 7. But short of that, even with a loss on Tuesday I don’t see the Rockets shaken enough to cough up that sixth game at home.

—Dave

by Dave on Apr 27, 2009 1:18 AM PDT up reply actions  

my last source of hope for forcing a game 7 is this

After getting manhandled in game 1 the Blazers have played Houston close in the other three games. The execution wasn’t there for long enough stretches, but playing Houston to a 3 point loss and a 1 point loss in Houston means it won’t take much to push the Blazers over the top. I think, for a young team in the playoffs for the first time, the close outcomes and the straightfoward corrections combine for great motivation. It’ll be hard, but it’s not out of their reach. A close loss may be demoralizing, but they’re right there with the Rockets. A solid win in game 5 and the confidence that they can play the rockets well even on the road present a grand opportunity to force a game 7.

"It’s a good ol’ fashioned Rip City beat down!"

by Magnum on Apr 27, 2009 1:38 AM PDT up reply actions  

If the Blazers had shown any indication of wresting this series from the Rockets you have to believe it would have come before now.

Just because they didn’t actually win either game in Houston doesn’t mean they failed to show any indication of wrestling this series from the Rockets. I am more optimistic. Blazers took a tough, veteran team to the wire in consecutive, huge playoff games on the road. Obvioulsy this team is good enough not to be satisfied with moral victories, but this was a better road performance than we’re giving the Blazers credit for.

Q: Is Greg favoring his knee?
Frye: He favors dunking on your head, that's what he favors.

by KP Corleone on Apr 27, 2009 6:53 AM PDT up reply actions   1 recs

Right On Dave

We probably expected too much from these exciting and talented players, but the lack of effort has been very disappointing. I also feel the style of play is a big part why they have not had much success in the playoffs. Jumpers are not going to get you there, but that seems to be 60% of the shots this team takes.

When do we get to question the coaching?

by ralphzillo on Apr 27, 2009 9:49 AM PDT up reply actions  

the upside view

During the regular season the Blazers played out of it almost the whole game each time. In the playoffs the first time they were awful, then put it together enough to lean on the home court and get the win.

First time on the road in the playoffs they were awful, fought back within range several times, and fell just short. Second time they actually assumed control of the game (which I think they had going into the fourth quarter), having playing much closer to even for much more of the game, with Aldridge on Yao and Yao in for….forever. Houston was better tonight than Fri IMO, but Portland was too. I would love to know what their first shot FGA% was, because my sense was that the Blazers set halfcourt defense was really strong tonight.

This team is an adjusting, learning, processing team that feeds off confidence and comfort, no doubt. It’s a tall order, but I expect a G5 win as well—and then I really think Houston feels tighter if it’s close near the end of G6, which I think it will be because of the heightened comfort by the third game on the road. Steal one there and it’s anyone’s guess for G7.

by torridjoe on Apr 27, 2009 1:35 AM PDT reply actions  

I will be very happy when Aldridge learns how to shoot 3’s

The was one play where Rudy penetrated into the middle of the key and then kicked the ball out to Aldridge, who was literally standing on the 3-point line. Aldridge took the shot (and missed) and the Mikes said something like "that is Aldridge’s shot, if the Rockets are going to give him that shot then the Blazers will be happy to take it." The thing is, really long 2-point shots like that are not very efficient even if the shooter is open. I am not so sure that the Blazers should be happy to take that shot, it seems like the type of shot that should only be taken as a last resort.

Aldridge being able to shoot that shot is just like the ability of Scola and Landry to hit jump shots for Houston(though Scola and Landry are actually a little more efficient at shooting jumpers than Aldridge): it is a somewhat useful ability to have, but it isn’t efficient enough to really force the opponents to try and stop it. If the opponents decide that hey have something more important to do on defense (like double teaming a center or protecting the paint) they can get away with letting you take that shot, and you probably won’t make it often enough to really make them pay.

The 3-point shot is completely different from the long 2 in terms of it’s efficiency and the impact that it will have on the defense. Even someone who isn’t a top-notch 5-point shooter will knock down those shots often enough that the defense will be absolutely forced to try and stop them. If a 3-point shooter pops out to the perimeter, a defender has to abandon any responsibilities they may have on the interior to go out and defend against the 3-point shot. In a pick-and-pop play, if the screen setter can shoot 3’s then the one of the defenders has to get out on him and the options for stopping the ball-handler become much more limited. The long 2 is a shot that you take when you can’t get anything better and the defense lets you take it because they don’t really care enough to try and stop it; the 3-point shot is a shot that you want to take and that the defense will stretch itself to the breaking point to try and prevent.

by trk on Apr 27, 2009 1:37 AM PDT reply actions  

I hope LMA NEVER learns how to shoot threes!

That’s the shot that ruined Cliff Robinson, ‘sheed, and many other talented bigs. LMA is 6’11", for God’s sake! He needs to learn how to score consistently in the paint, and I’m confident he will. Let the guards shoot the threes; the Blazers need to learn to exploit their rare combination of length, agility, and speed. Dunks, hook shots, rebounding, tip-ins: you lose all that when your bigs are hanging out beyond the arc.

Dirk Novitski shoots the long ball better than any 7-footer in memory, and how many rings does he have?

"We don't back down to nobody." --Joel Przybilla

by hurryup09 on Apr 27, 2009 2:23 AM PDT up reply actions  

You would rather have him shoot long 2's while standing on the line??

Yes, Aldridge should work on scoring in the paint. No, he is not going to be in the paint every play. Even Oden and Przybilla frequently come out to the 3-point line to set picks, despite not being able to score if they are more than 5 feet from the basket. If he is going to be out there anyway, why shouldn’t he learn to take that shot?

by trk on Apr 27, 2009 3:04 AM PDT up reply actions  

I'm happy either way.

If he can shoot threes consistently then it makes a lot of sense for him to take that shot. I don’t see him falling in love with it, and if he’s shooting over 35% from the 3 point line then it’s probably more efficient then long 2 pointers anyway.

It’s not something I’m desperate to see, but it would be nice. It’s not like Dirk is hurting anyway by sinking the long ball. I just don’t want LMA to forget about his inside game.

When I came here (in 2004), guys like Nick (Van Exel) and Damon, they were a breath of fresh air for me,'' Przybilla

by Nick Van Excellent on Apr 27, 2009 4:02 AM PDT up reply actions  

i feel like portland should have shot more threes in the series, period.

Not bad shots, but more kicking out to the corner. The 3 point is a distinct advantage that is totally fine with me if they jack them up (especially off penetration, or instead of tough, contested long twos). It seems like portland thought of jumpshooting as a weakness in this series where they really should have thought of it as their strength. This could probably be attributed to the defense of the rockets to some degree, and just a lack of movement off the ball and ball movement. They’ve been hesitent to shoot because they are overthinking everything, oh well. The one game LMA thinks of the jumper as his strength, we win.

by appel82 on Apr 27, 2009 7:41 AM PDT up reply actions  

M'Lady was pretty good in the first half, but seemed hesistant in the second...especially the fourth

Sometimes it seems like M’la shies away from the fourth quarter, amirite? You don’t hear about a lot of HUGE fourth quarters from Aldridge.

Blazer Fan

by leeroyjenkins on Apr 27, 2009 8:09 AM PDT up reply actions  

great recap as always

that is all about the lessons to learn. If you’re not sure and go check Houston last6 playoffs history.

Blazers are just not ready yet, maybe fans either. In the end, results are matter most, Houston fans have being complianed ref for years, Can you name a team more dirty than Jazz? We all knew how crazy Jazz fans are….. all being said, Houstons have been there, even lose. Somehow, both players and fans are tired to complained about refs, maybe few hours after game, but in the end, they found no excuses. Result matter most! As Rox fan, i love to watch Portland game, by the way, i am Pippen fan, still can’t forget the loss 2000WCF…… ANYWAY, i hope Blazers can learn something from Rocket.
Wether win or loss this serise, make sure learn something.

by bingfei on Apr 27, 2009 2:13 AM PDT reply actions  

Not losing hope

I wouldn’t give up on these Blazers yet – they tend to do their best when their backs are to the wall. It will be tough, but they could still take this series – I’m confident they’ll at least take game 5.

If they do manage to win the series after this, the mental toughness they will have gained will make them bad news for their next opponent.

The refereeing was bad in this game, for sure, especially the early calls against the Blazer centers – but the small lineup they were forced to go to did well, they may want to use it more. In spite of all adversity (and those were some really adverse refs), they played well enough to give themselves a chance to win. They just didn’t execute well enough down the stretch.

They’ll win the next one going away.

by greenknight on Apr 27, 2009 2:54 AM PDT reply actions  

After a loss

Instead of a recap, you should just post a poll asking fans who they blame for the loss.

"The brownies,'' Fernandez said after the game. "The brownies are good for me to make three-points.''

by tominhawaii on Apr 27, 2009 3:53 AM PDT reply actions   1 recs

I blame you.

I always blame you.

Nate is also sort of to blame since he didn’t play all of our point guards at the same time.

When I came here (in 2004), guys like Nick (Van Exel) and Damon, they were a breath of fresh air for me,'' Przybilla

by Nick Van Excellent on Apr 27, 2009 4:05 AM PDT up reply actions  

+1

      All island residents are to blame. After all, how soon could
they get revenge ? Doesn’t it take 14 hours to steam to America
by Tugboat ?

It's GO time !

by walkoff41 on Apr 27, 2009 1:49 PM PDT up reply actions  

But I thought you loved all the ....

…. teeth gnashing and finger pointing that goes on here.

In the end, it’s just another basketball game. I thought Portland played fairly well, just not quite well enough to win. As Dave said, a mistake here or there. I missed the first quarter so I didn’t see the shot clock violation or the Yao non-called foul, otherwise I might have been pissed at the officiating, but over all, I saw a Blazer team that could have won this game and just missed by a small margin. I can’t get too upset about that.

hakkaa päälle !

by timg56 on Apr 27, 2009 7:15 AM PDT up reply actions  

+1

For accuracy.

Of all the things that can be expressed in the printed word – love, hate, fear, joy – true humor is the one that is the most difficult of all. Sarcasm, for example, is an art of delicate subtlety. Yet too many people wield it as a bulldozer – loud, smelly, ugly, and destructive – and think they are being funny.

by T Darkstar on Apr 27, 2009 8:11 AM PDT up reply actions  

-1

Were and Where are 2 different words.

by Zaig on Apr 27, 2009 8:47 AM PDT up reply actions  

I did that on purpose

Blazers fans love to point out others mistakes.

"The brownies,'' Fernandez said after the game. "The brownies are good for me to make three-points.''

by tominhawaii on Apr 27, 2009 9:48 AM PDT up reply actions  

Usually me!

Well, mistakes are okay. Blatant misuse of a word is not!

by Zaig on Apr 27, 2009 1:16 PM PDT up reply actions  

Rec'd. Thanks for saving me from having to create a fanpost

about what a bunch of losers the Blazers are, and how Nate couldn’t coach rain to fall, and Blake makes more turnovers than Pillsbury, and LaMarcus is softer than the padding in Paris Hilton’s bra, and so on.

by MiledAnimal on Apr 27, 2009 3:20 PM PDT up reply actions  

As a die-hard Rockets fan...

I just want to clear up a few things about why Houston was always booing the refs and why we blame the refs for our losses. I’ll agree that the officiating has been more favorable to the Rockets in this series, and that’s something completely new to us. The Rockets have been destroyed by the refs the past few seasons. In the 2004-2005 season, some of you might remember when our head coach at the time, Jeff Van Gundy, was fined $100,000 for criticizing the referees after Mark Cuban told them to focus on Yao. We were utterly screwed in that series against the Mavs after going up 2-0. Yao was continually being called for phantom moving screens and we can’t forget the infamous (at least at ClutchFans.net) Michael Finley steal from out of bounds that won the Mavs a crucial game. What I’m getting at is, please excuse us if we sounds like a bunch of whiners. We’re so used to getting screwed by the referees that it’s become a reflex to boo every call we see.

by F-DAB on Apr 27, 2009 6:03 AM PDT reply actions  

And it's working!

Good for you. I’m all for booing the refs. It’s working like a charm. Nate needs to be doing a lot more of it…

by blazingjim on Apr 27, 2009 8:46 AM PDT up reply actions  

At least you have some sanity

And calls going your way in 1 and 3 point games make a pretty big difference. (Difference between 3-1 and possibly 1-3.)

Just because you guys have been shafted in the past doesn’t mean we deserve it now though. Look at the 9 fouls on Oden and Przybilla, and tell me that Yao did not do at least 5 things equally as bad. This is ridiculous and it may be the first playoff series I’ve watched where the refs actually decided the entire series.

Before anyone cries about this statement. I know, Portland could have done things better and won the game despite the trash calls. However, Portland didn’t, but they still played better than Houston and by all rights should have won the game.

There is no excuse for the offensive rebounds that Portland gave up, but there is also no excuse for the way the refs are calling these games.

by Zaig on Apr 27, 2009 8:50 AM PDT up reply actions  

he never said

that portland was shafted or deserve to be shafted because of houston’s past. he was just trying to explain why he thinks the houston fans were booing the refs so much.

by bung_ho on Apr 27, 2009 10:19 AM PDT up reply actions  

Nice recap...

But, I have never understood, how, in a one point game, one possession matters more than another. The Blazers didn’t lose because Scola’s shot counted, but did lose because of Blake’s turnover? The Blazers didn’t lose because they missed an open jumper, but did lose because of Pryzbilla’s rebounding error? I just cannot buy that logic.

That being said, I agree with the basic idea that the reason the Blazers may not win this series is that they are not quite good enough. It would be nice if the Blazers were a lot better than the Rockets, but they aren’t (that includes being a little worse). If your are not a lot better than the other team, you risk losing some close games and the series itself.

I’m looking forward to seeing if the Blazers can bounce back and win in Portland. They should know that they are plenty good enough to do so.

by PoliSam on Apr 27, 2009 6:11 AM PDT reply actions  

Here's the problem

Losing because of your players is one thing. Losing because of the refs is another.

by Zaig on Apr 27, 2009 8:51 AM PDT up reply actions  

Yes you did.

And said it rather clearly, IMO. Lots of lost opportunities by the Blazers was indeed the difference between a win and a loss.

And let’s also not forget that the Rockets did not capitalize on all their opportunities, either. Still, if I’m comparing the two lists (missed Blazer opportunities vs. missed Rocket opportunities), I think the Blazer list is just a bit longer, unfortunately.

Those offensive boards in the 4th quarter really hurt…..

by Storyteller on Apr 27, 2009 11:58 AM PDT up reply actions  

Sorta...

You said that anyone of the mistakes mattered, but emphasized the mistakes over any one of the unlucky events that also affected the outcome, like a bad call by an official, a ball that bounced funny off the rim into Houston’s hands, or a ball that hit back iron and went into the hoop, etc.

by PoliSam on Apr 27, 2009 12:51 PM PDT up reply actions  

Hi everyone,
I am a Laker fan but am even a bigger fan of good basketball and as such, enjoy watching the Portland Trailblazers. They are an excellent young team that play with a lot of heart and perhaps are one of the only teams in the Western Conference that can truly intimidate and knock of my dear Lakers.

Anyway, I enjoyed reading your post but I do feel like you should have given more credit to the Houston Rockets. I thought it was remarkable the way they came back in the fourth quarter. It was smart for Chuck Hayes to anticipate the Brandon Roy charge, and it also showed the true potential of Shane Battier.

Portland made this a game and could have won it. But I think Houston did their part by stepping up to the challenge and making a comeback.

by mochagirl13 on Apr 27, 2009 6:12 AM PDT reply actions  

You're right

And quite honestly I think Houston will give the Lakers a hanfdul. They are a very very good team.

Blazer Fan

by leeroyjenkins on Apr 27, 2009 6:48 AM PDT up reply actions  

I think Houston plays them even

They can defend with anyone in the league. Battier and Artest can tag-team Kobe. The Portland/Houston series isn’t over yet, but if the Lxkers wind up playing against Houston, that series goes the distance. – Elgin

Tonight felt like the day you open the mail and receive an acceptance letter to your dream school: the University of Playoffs. - Ben Golliver, Apr 15 2009

by 22baylor on Apr 27, 2009 12:06 PM PDT up reply actions  

They can't even defend Roy anymore

It’s the rest of our guys that aren’t stepping up.

by Zaig on Apr 27, 2009 1:18 PM PDT up reply actions  

Mochagirl you are right

The difference in the game is that Battier made those 3’s, etc and the Rockets took the opportunities given. They got those opportunities because their game is fundamentaly sound. We have to guard the paint cuz they come into it. We don’t and many times never have. Therefore they can dish out for those open looks they had all night… Our wins have come from the Travis or Blake or Rudy long shots and only Roy goes in the middle, which is why they were waiting for him. Breaking it down, this has been Blazer ball all year, so it shouldn’t be such a surprise that we are in this situation. What is causing the issue I think is that we are still being given the chance using Blazer ball ethic to win these games and we are not executing on them. The LMA 2’s(or not shooting them) never happened this year. Got us here, but now we are thinking too much.
We have 3 more games, if we want them. I know the Blazers Edge folks want em, but the sting is too much right now for some.
See you Tuesday, and I hope we travel to Inglewood and thump some Purple and Yellow fellows….

by Blaze n da Couv on Apr 27, 2009 6:56 AM PDT reply actions  

Staples is downtown...

The Forum is in Inglewood. Just clarifying.

by JasonT on Apr 27, 2009 10:00 AM PDT up reply actions  

Houston is just playing better than us right now, but overall I thought last night was a good effort

Joel is pounding the bejeezus out of Yao and all those fouls were earned. Greg not so much but apparently they aren’t going to allow Greg to play this season for whatever reason. Seems like an odd way to market one of your ‘up-and-coming’ stars but apparently NBA officals and executives are too stupid to allow Greg to shine. Maybe next season.

I thought overall the defense was a lot better than in previous games. It’s hard when guys like Scola and Landry can’t miss. On the other hand it seems like Houston feels pretty confident and looks pretty smooth breaking our defense down.

Our main problem it seems to me is that we don’t have a reliable second option that puts pressure on the other teams’ defense. One guy on our team gets points at the line. One. M’lady is decent sometimes as a second option but he hardly ever draws fouls and even when he does he’s not a great foul shooter. Travis has been an even bigger basket case than usual in this series. And that’s where it ends. Yeah Rudy will get a couple threes. Cool. We lack variety. Houston knows it and that’s why they are all over Roy.

Anyway barring a miracle all in all this was a pretty successful season all things considered. Getting taken out behind the shed by Houston might be the best thing that could happen to us. Depends on how the guys respond to it.

Blazer Fan

by leeroyjenkins on Apr 27, 2009 6:57 AM PDT reply actions  

P.S. I thought really where we lost this series was the disaster in game 1

coming out like deer in the headlights is probably going to cost us the series. that’s the price you pay for being playoff rookies i suppose.

Blazer Fan

by leeroyjenkins on Apr 27, 2009 7:03 AM PDT up reply actions  

Not a bad observation.

Had it not been for game 1, Portland could be looking at a tied series with them almost taking two from Houston on the road.

hakkaa päälle !

by timg56 on Apr 27, 2009 7:18 AM PDT up reply actions  

Have we lost the series?

I thought it was best of 7. Am I wrong? Did they change the rules?

When I came here (in 2004), guys like Nick (Van Exel) and Damon, they were a breath of fresh air for me,'' Przybilla

by Nick Van Excellent on Apr 27, 2009 7:30 AM PDT up reply actions  

I commend your optimism / homerism

But the reality is that yeah it’s pretty much over

Blazer Fan

by leeroyjenkins on Apr 27, 2009 8:06 AM PDT up reply actions  

Homerism?

I never said we were going to win, in fact I predicted Huston from the start, I just think it’s a bit premature to start talking about it being over. I would like to enjoy the last couple games before I start lamenting the loss. That’s like being down 15 going into the fourth quarter and then turning off the TV.

In fact, didn’t the Suns beat the Lakers in 2006 after being down 3-1?


“After falling into a 1-3 hole in their first-round series with the Lakers, the Suns dug their way out and put an exclamation point on their comeback with a 31-point win in Game 7 on Saturday night.”-nba.com

It’s not over until it’s over.

When I came here (in 2004), guys like Nick (Van Exel) and Damon, they were a breath of fresh air for me,'' Przybilla

by Nick Van Excellent on Apr 27, 2009 8:22 AM PDT up reply actions  

You should google how many teams come back from 3-1

When I came here (in 2004), guys like Nick (Van Exel) and Damon, they were a breath of fresh air for me,'' Przybilla

by Nick Van Excellent on Apr 27, 2009 9:11 AM PDT up reply actions  

we have proboboly about a 10% chance-- better than the average team down 3-1 because we have HCA

the percentages are skewed by a lot of 1 and 2 seeds leading 3-1 over lower seeded teams. In a series this evenly matched, and with homecourt, we still have a chance. Not a good chance, but a chance.

by jksnake99 on Apr 27, 2009 9:27 AM PDT up reply actions  

I figure there have been at least a hundred 3-1 series over the years so yeah

I figure it’s in the single digits. Though I’ll give Portland a nudge toward unrealism and agree with your 10%

Blazer Fan

by leeroyjenkins on Apr 27, 2009 10:17 AM PDT up reply actions  

unrealism?

What do you figure the odds of us winning each game are? Probably 67% at home and 33% on the road? 2/3 * 2/3 * 1/3 = 4/27 or 15%. Considering we lost by 3 and 1, I don’t think 33% on the road is a stretch, and I’d put game 5 at even higher than 67%.

by Zaig on Apr 27, 2009 1:20 PM PDT up reply actions  

Aren't you just a bundle of joy

Best of 7 series, so NO it’s really not over. There’ll be plenty of time to make sarcastic comments and pat yourself on the back should we lose one of the next three.

by levelhed on Apr 27, 2009 8:28 AM PDT up reply actions  

You should google how many teams come back from 3-1

When I came here (in 2004), guys like Nick (Van Exel) and Damon, they were a breath of fresh air for me,'' Przybilla

by Nick Van Excellent on Apr 27, 2009 9:11 AM PDT up reply actions  

Oh and PS I'm not patting myself on the back, I was hoping we'd win

Unfortuntalely the odds are overwhelmingly in favor of us not winning. I know some people admire blind optimism and pie in the sky unrealistic hopes and dreams, but I prefer to stick to the real word thanks.

Blazer Fan

by leeroyjenkins on Apr 27, 2009 9:12 AM PDT up reply actions  

It's not over.

I don’t see why some people are like “omg, we failed, we’re done”

by CyclonicWinds on Apr 27, 2009 8:23 AM PDT up reply actions  

You should google how many teams come back from 3-1

When I came here (in 2004), guys like Nick (Van Exel) and Damon, they were a breath of fresh air for me,'' Przybilla

by Nick Van Excellent on Apr 27, 2009 9:11 AM PDT up reply actions  

Boy, that was hard to read three times in a row.

Tonight felt like the day you open the mail and receive an acceptance letter to your dream school: the University of Playoffs. - Ben Golliver, Apr 15 2009

by 22baylor on Apr 27, 2009 12:08 PM PDT up reply actions  

New pre-game routine for Oden

Instead of shooting and working on post-up moves, the entirety of Oden’s pregame routine should be devoted to avoiding fouls.

And in the off-season, the Blazers should hire a retired referee and work on understanding how the game is officiated. Everyday that he works on basketball he should be learning how to avoid fouling.

by PoliSam on Apr 27, 2009 8:23 AM PDT reply actions   1 recs

+1

I’ve watched just about every game Greg’s played, since he was in college, and all of his fans at OSU had the same exact criticism. It’s amazing that no coaches have been able to get it through his system. He needs to be somehow practicing/studying this EVERY SINGLE DAY this summer.

During the time he’s been on the court, Greg has been fairly productive this year, but he has not improved at all in terms of fouling, and in fact he’s gotten slightly worse (on a per minute basis) as the year progressed.

Q: Is Greg favoring his knee?
Frye: He favors dunking on your head, that's what he favors.

by KP Corleone on Apr 27, 2009 8:50 AM PDT up reply actions  

Oden gets his share of bonehead fouls

But in each of these games, he has also got his share of, “Stand there, watch Yao run into him, and watch the ref blow the whistle.” Or, “Watch Yao lose the ball, watch the ref blow the whistle.”

by Zaig on Apr 27, 2009 8:54 AM PDT up reply actions  

Two of those "stand there" fouls in the last game

Greg is supposed to just get out of Yao’s way you know.

by levelhed on Apr 27, 2009 10:42 AM PDT up reply actions  

Oden Should practice with One Hand Tied Behind his Back

Greg has problems moving his hands independently from each other on D. If you can’t play D with one hand, then you will pick up fouls. And I would say, for now, forget trying to pick up charges. Prove that the player can make the shot- go for the block, get the rebound.

by ralphzillo on Apr 27, 2009 10:04 AM PDT up reply actions  

Przybilla had the same problem

He’s finally learned to deal with it in his late 20s. Don’t expect Greg to be much different.

"...we have so many experts who think that you have to play defense, you have to rebound, you have to be a possession coach, you have to execute. I just laugh. Explosive offense is not as intimidating as dominant defense. But it is scary when you don't know how to stop someone." - George Karl, Nuggets coach

by jamon51 on Apr 27, 2009 2:07 PM PDT up reply actions  

Good recap, Dave.

I guess more than anything I am just sad after last night. It is just hard to believe that after everything that we have gone through this year, it is all down to one final game. Win or enjoy the summer. Honestly, I am not mad at one particular player in general, just very frustrated with how this has all played out. Every player has made mistakes and like Dave said, no one player should be held accountable for the loss. It bugs me when I see people calling for Blake’s head and demanding an immediate trade of him. How easily they forget that when Blake went out with that shoulder injury the Blazers went through their roughest patch of the season. I don’t think that that was just coincidence. Do we need an upgrade at PG? I think so. Are we doomed with Steve Blake as many people here seem to think we are? Not a chance.

That being said, I will not lose what little hope that remains until that clock reads 0.0 and the Rockets have 4 wins in their column. We’ve been in holes like this before in the playoffs and fought back. Let’s make this series the time that we actually win that 7th game. It isn’t over till the fat lady sings.

Can I get a headband? One for my peeps, one for the fans in the really cheap seats, one for my momma, one for the mayor, and if you wanna get down with the players, YOU GOTTA GET A HEADBAND!

by peseme16 on Apr 27, 2009 8:34 AM PDT reply actions  

what's wrong with just blaming the refs?

Honestly. The refs sucked. This whole series has been completely lopsided. Nate’s too docile on the bench. Not once has he stood up for the team to the zebras. For that matter, neither have the fans. Do you think Spurs fans would put up with this? Lakers fans? I mean, an offensive foul, when Battier body-drags Roy right into a defender?

Ridiculous. Nate should have got himself thrown out of that game in the first half. Ticky-tack fouls on Pryz and Oden while Battier and Artest are draped all over our guys. I hope the fans throw s*** in game 5 in our house.

Playoff basketball is about psyching out the refs. If we don’t start playing the game, we’ll never win a series.

by blazingjim on Apr 27, 2009 8:34 AM PDT reply actions  

And I've said this before

In the regular season, just under 10% of the games had “bad” refs. In this series it’s 75%, although game 1 wouldn’t have mattered regardless.

by Zaig on Apr 27, 2009 1:21 PM PDT up reply actions  

Dont hang your heads over this series

regardless of the outcome. The Blazers are getting there first taste of playoff basketball and it comes against a very good opponant. This series will help the players with there growth over the summer. You would have to think there will be alot of knowledge gleened from this experiance, the players will have all summer to recap a very succesful season. Portland will be tough next year and they will understand even more about playoff positioning. The 08-09 season was about getting here next year will be about doing some damage.

I try to help with everything," Fernandez said. "If the coach says go rebound, I go rebound. I work for the team.

""If I'm playing this game to get media and attention, I shouldn't be here," Aldridge said. "I'm here to play basketball, and do what I can do to help this team win."

His stare became blank. It was apparent he was back in that place, on the Rose Garden's logo, picking up Aaron Brooks as the crowd nervously roared.

by Dragonage on Apr 27, 2009 8:37 AM PDT reply actions  

The Rockets Aren't Any Good

The Rockets are not a good team. They’re going to get blown out by the Lakers. We should be kicking and screaming about the officiating. If we ever want to win in the playoffs, we have to expect to win, and part of expecting to win is not getting walked all over by the zebras. Nate’s head should have blown off in that game. Adelman complains about everything! Touching Yao was like electroshock treatment last night. Ztttt, you touched him and a whistle blew.

by blazingjim on Apr 27, 2009 8:41 AM PDT up reply actions  

This is one of the more ridiculous posts I've seen here in awhile, congrats

The Rockets are pretty good.

P.S. Saying that expecting to win includes kicking and screaming about the officiating is kinda dumb though I do agree that a well-placed T here and there could help.

Blazer Fan

by leeroyjenkins on Apr 27, 2009 9:02 AM PDT up reply actions  

Moreover

the Rockets are the worst matchup we could have drawn in the first round. Worse than the Lxkers even. – Elgin

Tonight felt like the day you open the mail and receive an acceptance letter to your dream school: the University of Playoffs. - Ben Golliver, Apr 15 2009

by 22baylor on Apr 27, 2009 12:10 PM PDT up reply actions  

wow.... just wow

When you are down 3-1 and say the other team isn’t any good… what does that make your team?

by grungedave on Apr 27, 2009 10:09 AM PDT up reply actions  

i understand

being a fan and having optimism for the team and all, but i don’t agree with so many ppl saying that the blazers are that much better than the rockets. the rockets’ only loss to portland going back to last season (at least 8 games or so?) was the one game with roy’s 3. the rockets with tmac, without him, didn’t really make a difference.

so just like the rockets take a lot of grief for not proving anything yet without having won a playoff series, i think the blazers need to prove themselves against the rockets before claiming to be the superior team …

by bung_ho on Apr 27, 2009 1:55 PM PDT up reply actions  

The Blazers are not better than the Rockets, clearly.

The 3-1 game total so far shows that.

I would not say the Rockets are overwhelmingly more talented than the Blazers at this point. I would say they are playing better. I would say they know what they’re doing wheras the Blazers are still learning.

—Dave

by Dave on Apr 27, 2009 2:28 PM PDT up reply actions  

i wasn't even counting this 3-1 postseason

when i mentioned the 8 games going back to last season.

but I agree, you also can’t say the rockets are overwhelmingly more talented either. blazers definitely have some young exciting players who are sure to get better.

then again, houston has some young guys with room to improve too, not to mention a 22M hole they can try to fill with something …

bottom line is that we should have some entertaining basketball to watch over the next few seasons. and this series isn’t over yet either.

by bung_ho on Apr 27, 2009 3:50 PM PDT up reply actions  

tough loses

but right now.. the rockets are playing like the team that will not let themselves lose and the Blazers are playing like the team that is trying to win..

all the difference in the world.. all of those first round exits and ronron hatings are percolating in this Rocket crew, and they are fighting harder during most of the game…

But now that we are in elimination mode, will their intensity continue to match ours? Will we turn it up so we don’t go home? One game at a time.. I’m already preparing for Tuesday.. I’m sure they are too.. Go BLAZERS!!!!

Take it to the Hole!!

by galacticlove on Apr 27, 2009 8:42 AM PDT reply actions  

call me naive

but I am not willing to write an epitath on this series yet (course I did root strenuously for the JailBlazer incarnations as well and still miss Sheed, so there you go). Yes, it is obvious that the mental toughness and consistency have not been there to get the Blazers over the top. Still the story line of the last two years has been learning ahead of the curve. I doubt we will pull this series out, but I will be surprised if we do not make a few more unexpected leaps in maturity before the final whistle blows. As much as the losses have hurt, except for Game 1 the Blazers have been right there till the end. Everyone knows that eventually they will bust through the mental ceiling holding them back. And most everyone has been wrong about how long similar advances would take in the past.

by Leseid on Apr 27, 2009 9:20 AM PDT reply actions  

THE BLAZERS ARE KILLING ME!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

KILLING ME!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I kind of want them to lose tomorrow so they can just end my agony. ……I just keep repeating to myself, ‘They are gonna be SOOOOO good next year’……. After this I’m going to have to cheer on the Lakers and I soooo do not want to do that!

by jenstcy on Apr 27, 2009 9:21 AM PDT reply actions  

THEN DON'T !!

p.s. – You mentioned the name of that team formerly from Minneapolis !
          Get a grip on yourself !!

It's GO time !

by walkoff41 on Apr 27, 2009 1:56 PM PDT up reply actions  

Houston had the most 2nd chance points they've had all year

wow. That should never happen against this good rebounding Blazer team.

by jksnake99 on Apr 27, 2009 9:32 AM PDT reply actions  

I think Dave nailed that one.

We are so preoccupied with defending Yao, there are no bodies left in the paint to rebound. I don’t see how Yao doesn’t average 20 boards all year. If he just thinks about boxing out, no rebound should ever get past him.

Don't believe the hype.

by Artie Fufkin on Apr 27, 2009 9:48 AM PDT up reply actions  

I don't want to hear

How the Blazers played sloppy or missed opportunities. We were jobbed out by the refs, plain and simple.

Blazers = Sting

Rockets = Ric Flair

Refs = Charles Robinson

Yes, the refs were arguing with Arn Anderson while Flair hit us with a low blow. When they looked back, Flair had us pinned. 1-2-3.

These are my principles. If you don't like them, I have others. -Groucho Marx

by RDreamer on Apr 27, 2009 9:34 AM PDT reply actions  

Anyone else

Just want to see Roy, Rudy, Trout/Batum, LA & Gregzilla at the end of games? I see this as being our best playoff lineup.

by ericande on Apr 27, 2009 9:44 AM PDT reply actions  

Brandon Roy

He made a couple of mistakes in the 4th quarter, but that’s atypical of him in close games. I like how he’s taken up the challenge from Artest and Battier. He’s not backing down from them. Roy is a great player. He’s facing the best perimeter defense in the playoffs and he’s playing as well as you would want him to play.

Life is not by chance. Basketball is life.

by blzrfan on Apr 27, 2009 10:00 AM PDT reply actions  

really?

Not to slander all the BE readers/commenters…

but you need to let the “referee” thing go. They have not directly influenced ANY of the outcomes of any game (and that’s with me thinking that Game 2 was horribly officiated).

To win in the playoffs, you need to defend, rebound and make free throws.

The Rockets have done 2/3. The Blazers have done 1/3 of these things. Thus, the difference in the series.

Blaming the refs is a knee-jerk, common reaction. But it’s also wrong.

by grungedave on Apr 27, 2009 10:11 AM PDT reply actions  

Portland fans tend to not be all that realistic, which is why those of us who are always villified whenever we post truths

It’s sort of like Green Bay with Favre

But that’s ok, it’s part of what makes us ‘charming’

Blazer Fan

by leeroyjenkins on Apr 27, 2009 10:15 AM PDT up reply actions  

Look at your Dreamshake recap of the loss in Portland

Some fans are going to blame refs no matter what. I suggest you take a step back and realize most of the comments here acknowledge the loss as the result of poor execution. Did the Rocket fans let the “referee” thing go against the Jazz the past 2 years?

To me this comment is just poor taste. Most of the commentators here are thoughtful, I’m sure a bit biased, but that comes with the territory.

Life is not by chance. Basketball is life.

by blzrfan on Apr 27, 2009 10:19 AM PDT up reply actions  

hey...

I am not slandering all of BE here…
I’m saying the handful that think Yao is getting all the calls and that Stern is doing this on purpose need to chill. Both teams play physical basketball and the referees have a VERY tough chore in balancing between “letting them play” and “blowing the whistle.”

Game 2 had horrible calls… but they were horrible against BOTH teams, and therefore the reason the Rockets lost Game 2 was because when we got free throws, we missed. Simple as that.

by grungedave on Apr 27, 2009 10:24 AM PDT up reply actions  

How many comments are blaming Stern and conspiracies? There are always going to be unreasonable comments about referees on a popular site like this. When you have to start a comment by saying “not to slander all BE readers/commenters”, you probably shouldn’t say it.

Life is not by chance. Basketball is life.

by blzrfan on Apr 27, 2009 10:33 AM PDT up reply actions  

I suggest you re-read

I good 40% of the comments blame the refs for the loss of Game 4 in some direct or indirect manner… thus my desire to respond and say “get over it”.

by grungedave on Apr 27, 2009 11:04 AM PDT up reply actions  

eventually, we will

we are still smarting from 2 tough losses though. It’ll take us a while to look rationally at it.

by jksnake99 on Apr 27, 2009 11:09 AM PDT up reply actions  

I see 5 people directly talking about the refs in this thread

The rest of the commentators are talking about the game. Not even close to 40%. Please don’t pull things out of thin air.

Life is not by chance. Basketball is life.

by blzrfan on Apr 27, 2009 11:16 AM PDT up reply actions  

If you want to read the conspiracy comments . . .

       go to O-live’s site. You will get plenty and more !

It's GO time !

by walkoff41 on Apr 27, 2009 1:58 PM PDT up reply actions  

Yao IS getting all the calls

So far: 1 for Yao for every 3 by Joel/Greg. The conspiracy theory nuts are always out there, but you can’t deny the refs have made life much easier for the Rockets thus far.

by levelhed on Apr 27, 2009 10:53 AM PDT up reply actions  

simple

Yao doesn’t have to guard Joel/Greg.
Both of them have to bang against Yao or he’ll go for 40.

two hands in back = foul. Each and every time. Same goes for when you impede his progress trying to go across the lane.

by grungedave on Apr 27, 2009 11:05 AM PDT up reply actions  

2 hands = foul

What does 0 hands equal? We are not saying that all 9 fouls were bogus, clearly they commit fouls on Yao. 4-5 of those fouls were bogus though, especially considered this is “playoff basketball” where Artest/Battier/Yao can do whatever they want.

by Zaig on Apr 27, 2009 1:24 PM PDT up reply actions  

as a houston fan

I’d like to first say that I did not see any flops from Portland in game 4. I also won’t go into details about the tickytack fouls from Oden because I haven’t seen any replays to make judgement on them.
But I would like to point out that while Joel is an above average defender, there is no way that he and Oden (or both) can shut Yao down for a long stretch of games. Yao is arguably the league’s most dominant center on Offense, and it is only a matter of time before Yao adjusts to the defense. Pryzbilla gives up too much size to be effective, and Oden has size, but not enough experience.
Given that the center position is not really the Blazer’s strength, it would be slightly presumptious of Blazer fans to assume their centers can easily shut down the leagues premier offensive center w/o foul problems.
If Oden eventually reaches his potential, you guys may realize my point.

by hardgay on Apr 27, 2009 5:56 PM PDT up reply actions  

the conspiracy theories are crazy, for sure

I do think its clear that Yao is getting away with much more than the Blazer big men. However, Portland still had ample opportunity to win, and blew it.

by jksnake99 on Apr 27, 2009 11:00 AM PDT up reply actions  

Right, game 2 had horrible calls vs BOTH teams

Games 3 and 4 had a lopsided amount of horrible calls vs ONLY ONE team.

by Zaig on Apr 27, 2009 1:23 PM PDT up reply actions  

I'm bitter

I just have to vent, and this isn’t all on Outlaw, but he’ll be my scapegoat. Why did he shoot that 3 with 8 seconds to go? I will never understand why he was in such a hurry to take that shot. I blame Trout for this loss. Bring back Webster!

If you let them make you, they'll make you into paper mache.
At a distance you're strong until the wind comes, then you'll crumble and blow away.
- Incubus

by ZooooomByU on Apr 27, 2009 10:23 AM PDT reply actions  

You’ve got to take the shot when you can get it, while leaving a few seconds for an O rebound and putback. The more the clock ticks, the less open you’re going to be…

by levelhed on Apr 27, 2009 10:57 AM PDT up reply actions  

I thought this was a great recap, good perspective

but saying Oden was ‘solid’?
myopic

So imitate the action of the tiger!.
- lend the eye a terrible aspect
and teach them how to war!
Henry V iii

by lietothegirls on Apr 27, 2009 10:40 AM PDT reply actions  

he's played good defense all series

If you forget the hype around him and just look at him as a rookie big man who has been keeping Yao relatively in check, I think you’ll see what Dave means. He’s not been the player we hoped for, not even close, but he deserves some credit for his D in this series, even if its a foul whenever he breathes on Yao.

by jksnake99 on Apr 27, 2009 11:02 AM PDT up reply actions  

Its sad

That the officiating was sooo poor, that Dave actually had to write the first half of this article trying to convince us that this was just the Blazers fault. Yes battle tested teams can overcome, but you can’t argue that we may be able to win this series if the stakes weren’t set against us like it is. How many defensive 3 seconds have they called on Houston’s zone? But my actual favorite is the amount of moving screens that Houston sets. They run you off the ball so that you have to switch. But as Dave said, we just have to know that Yao is not going to get a call and we are, so we have to play by more difficult rules than Houston does… wait, that seems like the refs are giving Houston an advantage to me? Here’s what I see, two very even teams coming into this series. I think this was a toss up and all four games have been poorly officiated in Houstons favor which swings the evenness of the teams in Houston’s favor.3 out of the 4 games have been super close, with the Blazers only able to prevail over the refs and Houston in one of those. I would say the team is actually over acheiving in the playoffs so far and we are still down 3-1 because we are playing against 2 opponents. I know I’m irritable which drives this post, but I don’t think it is really that far off.

Our society believes in "Policital Correctness" in other words we tear down the best of our society and make them live according to the lowest common denominator. It won't be long until Harrison Bergeron is declaring himself emperor!

by ablazrfool on Apr 27, 2009 11:18 AM PDT reply actions  

Totally agree

I knew as soon as the game was over that Dave would try to pin this on the Blazers playingerratically. That’s what Dave does. He doesn’t blame the officials. I like that about Dave.

However, Dave is wrong. This one can be laid solely at the feet of Monty McCutcheon and his cohorts in gray. The Blazers were unable to execute their game plan due to the nonsensical ticky-tack fouls called on Oden/Przy in the first quarter. Now, if we decide this is the standard, this is how fouls are going to be called,.then both Yao and Artest ought to have fouled out by halftime. This did not happen. There is a CLEAR double standard going on here.

The Rockets may as well have entered the arena to Also Sprach Zarathustra while wearing a sequined ‘Nature Boy’ robe.

These are my principles. If you don't like them, I have others. -Groucho Marx

by RDreamer on Apr 27, 2009 11:26 AM PDT up reply actions  

hahaha

Nice analogy. Too bad your anger is misplaced.

by grungedave on Apr 27, 2009 1:13 PM PDT up reply actions  

2 things

Monty and rebounding
1 wasn’t under our control
1 was

If we had legitimate refs we win tonight, but if we rebound for crap we also win tonight.

by Zaig on Apr 27, 2009 1:25 PM PDT up reply actions  

Nate should go don nelson in game 5

put in aldridge, roy, rudy, bayless, sergio and just get chaotic. j/k, But at least go out with a blast, or shake the game up, force the rockets to adjust. something different. i feel like i’m watching an episode of the same show over and over again that never picks up. Or reopening the fridge, hoping there will be a tasty beverage that will just appear, but nope. KP needs to go the flea market and pick me up some juice. i don’t think an all guard line up is the answer, but i’d like to see something unpredictable, 2 fouls on the centers early in the game? leave them both in and force the issue, show the refs your not going to adjust to their lame calls. SHAKE IT UP NATE! Rant over.

"The refs have caused a bird-pig flu pandemic"

by appel82 on Apr 27, 2009 11:53 AM PDT reply actions  

just not the same

To me, whats unbelievable in this series is the blazers are doing this well. They haven’t played one good game yet. Even the game we won only Brandon and LA really played well. This isn’t the team I saw play most of the year. They haven’t moved the ball well, penetrated well, or spaced well. Thats besides the fact that they haven’t shot well either. The rockets are getting performances that aren’t typical of the full season for them. The blazers have some guys playing real tentative, whether that’s because of lack of experience or not, I don’t know. The refs are obviously making things hard by these instant calls on us for touching Yao and the lack there of of the hacking, holding, etc of Artest, Scola, etc. One thing I can see is that if I was Oden or LA I would be working all off season on setting up on the block and powering to the basket with different moves. Especially Greg, if he can improve on his offensive shots and low post moves, this will be a totally different team next year. He also needs to learn to move his feet more of defense and not get the silly fouls. Then he can play more minutes. Keep improving Blazers you will get there with work.

by blazers63 on Apr 27, 2009 12:13 PM PDT reply actions   1 recs

Speaking of back up PGs....

Blazers are down 1-3. It’s do or die. Why don’t they go balls out and play Bayless?? He can’t do much worse!!!

by jenstcy on Apr 27, 2009 1:34 PM PDT up reply actions  

Panic got the better of the players, but the lack of preparation started two months ago
It’s pretty plain that the comfort/poise factor is a big reason why the edge is going to Houston right now. It’s just as plain that the Blazers won’t be eager to repeat that experience. You may see an entirely different team come into next regular season than you did this year.

Hey Kevin Pritchard, how does that decision to stand pat at the trading deadline feel, right about now?

“We’ve got great team chemistry and we want to let the cake bake”

Well the Rockets slammed the oven door in the 4th quarter and your cake…fell

The solution was so simple back in mid-February. KP had RLEC. He had assets like Sergio and Travis and draft choices and Paul Allen’s money. All he needed to add was a veteran PG with playoff experience and a veteran PF/C who could defend and bang for rebounds, and Nate’s roster would have been prepared for the playoffs.

But KP chose to stay the course, swap Diogu for Ruffin and collect another trade exception. I’m sure he’ll be busy again on draft day, not that all the belated wheeling and dealing will help the ballclub get out of round 1, right now

There’s plenty of blame going around here, and I for one feel KP shouldn’t be skating free

by two4larue on Apr 27, 2009 2:56 PM PDT reply actions  

You're correct

that when we skipped out on the trade deadline dealing we made a losing outcome in this year’s playoffs more likely. However the question remains whether this year’s playoffs should be the only barometer by which that decision is measured. It could well be that a veteran would have bought us a ticket to Round 2 and no farther. His salary, on the other hand, could have lasted well beyond that. Also there’s the potential of a better move being available this summer.

I want to win this series badly, even more since the games have been close. But I’m not prepared to make this the measuring stick by which the team is judged. When all is said and done, it’s still just their first trip to the playoffs…almost certainly one of many. It’s the most important thing in the universe this week. After that it’s not going to be crucial at all.

—Dave

by Dave on Apr 27, 2009 3:14 PM PDT up reply actions  

Im glad we did not make a move

at the trade deadline. Everything up until this post season has been speculation about how the Bazers would perform in the playoffs. I think there are several players that have have gone MIA. I think alot of players have stepped up also. KP will have alot better feel this summer for who Portland can count on in big time situations vs popularity. Im still not convinced we need to make a huge blockbuster type deal. Just add some muscle and experiance a small dose at a time and see what happens.

I try to help with everything," Fernandez said. "If the coach says go rebound, I go rebound. I work for the team.

""If I'm playing this game to get media and attention, I shouldn't be here," Aldridge said. "I'm here to play basketball, and do what I can do to help this team win."

His stare became blank. It was apparent he was back in that place, on the Rose Garden's logo, picking up Aaron Brooks as the crowd nervously roared.

by Dragonage on Apr 27, 2009 3:26 PM PDT reply actions  

Game 7

Im patiently waiting for game 7, Rip City will have officially returned after Blazers take this series 4-3…. one game at a time!!

by wapati on Apr 27, 2009 6:32 PM PDT reply actions  

Excuses

It’s funny how you all can sit their and blame the refs when they weren’t making calls on oden and pryz for holding Yoa every time they front him. those scratches he has on his arms and face aren’t hugs and kisses. the refs finally make the calls and everyone is crying. no one needs to rewind their dvr to certain times to catch bad calls or late shots. during the game, the refs don’t have dvr if you notice and they make the final calls at regular speed. Dave, you say your not trying to make excuses and blaming the refs and that its just the trailblazers making bad mistakes. yes you are. everything you have said blames the refs. the fouls, the expiring shot clock that the refs miss and to also bring up the fact that ron artest is celebrating his shot made after roy foul him which was a good call. ron is playing at home. he is keeping his fans happy in houston even if he had a bad night. it would be different if ron would had done it in portland so don’t ditch a players for enjoying himself for a basket he made with the foul. he is just pumping up his fans. i bet you wouldn’t say that if oden would have done the same thing and he hasn’t played good all year. don’t be a hater. and if you all think the rockets have been playing good this series, they have not. game 1 is how the rockets play. they have played poorly and porland have not taking advantage of it. what does that tell you about your team. better look next time. this series is over when rockets come back to houston. portland will get one more win. trailblazers better not put their guard down or they might not get that last one.

by reyster on Apr 27, 2009 7:47 PM PDT reply actions  

I hate it when Laker fans pretend to be Rockets fans

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Elements_of_Style

"The brownies,'' Fernandez said after the game. "The brownies are good for me to make three-points.''

by tominhawaii on Apr 28, 2009 3:19 AM PDT up reply actions  

just turned 50!

happy birthday, elements of style.

The Michael Ruffin of BlazersEdge, cuz Amlmart said so.

by BlazersOrBust on Apr 28, 2009 10:10 AM PDT up reply actions  

last.

Fearthesword.com: "There is no doubt that the long layoff, combined with the ease of the first two rounds had the Cavaliers a bit tired in the 4th quarter."

by Cablinasian on May 20, 2009 11:52 PM PDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

The ultimate coverage and analysis of the Portland Trail Blazers.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
The Blazers Future Regarding Free Agent Signings
Small
Thunderous Manboobies
Img_0878_1__small
Why do we hate LaMarcus Aldridge?
Small
Oregonlive "journalists" 2 new posts...same old drivel
2474796688_7cdc78828f_o_small
Greg Oden Suffers Life-Ending Injury; Gets 3-Year Extension

Recent FanPosts

Small
The Blazers' Future Regarding Trades
Small
WHAT TO DO WITH NIC BATUM BECAUSE WE WILL LOSE HIM IF NOT TRADED.
Small
Trade that helps us out now and the future
Small
How can the All-Star game be more fun and competitive?
Small
Earl Boykins!
Small
LaMarcus Aldridge about to become the 10th highest scorer in Blazers franchise  history
Small
New trade that gets us a new point and a three point shooter
Small
Portland getting.....
Small
The Sun Behind the Clouds: Blazers still on track.

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

FanShots

Quick hits of video, photos, quotes, chats, links and lists that you find around the web.

Recommended FanShots

It's pretty clear that the season is over already ;)
Double rainbow of sadness:

1) JBay is getting shorter
2) We never got to see him with a mustache

I miss you tiny raptor man.

via The Basketball Jones http://blogs.thescore.com/tbj/2012/02/09/things-of-note-for-february-9-2012/#more-34561
Blazers Broadcasters Mike Barrett and Mike Rice re-enacted NBA referee Scott Foster's controversial goaltending call on Portland Trail Blazers forward LaMarcus Aldridge, who was defending Oklahoma City Thunder All-Star forward Kevin Durant, during this week's edition of Blazers Courtside. Remarkably, no one was injured during the taping of this segment.

Original video of the play here. 
Quotes from the players and coaches here. 
The NBA admitting it got the call wrong here. 
Dave's  extended thoughts here. 
BlazersMakr's FanShot: Major Vegas action on OKC prior to tip here. 
Audio of Chad Doing of 750 AM The Game going HAM on Foster here.

OK, that should just about wrap up the goaltending discussion.

Courtside video via Blazers Broadcasting cameraman John Curry.

-- Ben Golliver | benjamin.golliver@gmail.com | Twitter
In 2008 Tim Donaghy indicated that Scott Foster was a ref that also fixed games
Blazers Owner Paul Allen Ranked No. 3 American Philanthropist In 2011

Recent FanShots

Bill Simmons: Deron Williams To Dallas 'Is A Lock'
LaMarcus Aldridge Needs Support Around Him
LaMarcus Aldridge Finds Out He's An All-Star With His Teammates
Congratulations to Portland Trail Blazers forward LaMarcus Aldridge, on his first All Star selection.

As seen on www.trailblazers.com
AWoj: Aldridge an All Star
CRAZY stat from Houston game
NBA MVP Rankings... LMA @ #10
Celtics interested in Rondo - Gasol swap? ...

+ New FanShot All FanShots >


Editors

Kitten_small Dave

Headshotsmall_small Ben Golliver

Lead Moderators

Getfuzzy-satchel_small Timmay!

Bucky3_small Cablinasian

Authors

Plainlc_small Storyteller

Moderators

Lamb_small T Darkstar

Small douglast

Terryporter_small prezofdeath

Small usmcr3049

Lrg_magpie_small Corvid

Wallpaper_small geoffm