Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Kobe Bryant Isn't Up To Speed On Jeremy Lin, 'Linning'

Game 3 Recap: Rockets 86, Blazers 83

Boxscore

Argh.

And in case you're wondering, that's not a lusty, pirate argh.  That's a "sometimes I wish I had pit bull jaws so I could clamp down on something just to hear it snap" argh.

It's about the same "argh" that was written all over the face of assistant coach Dean Demopoulos as he walked towards the tunnel at the end of the game.  If you have a recording still (provided you have a TV still after all of the objects thrown in its general direction tonight) you can check it out and see exactly what I mean.

Argh.

The Blazers looked like they were coming out of the gates strong in this game.  For 3-4 possessions we played the Rockets with guts and skill and passion.  The Blazers played as physically as I have ever seen them, in this incarnation anyway.  This looked like a FIGHT.  It was perfect for a road game.  Then some difficult stuff happened--a little Houston aggressiveness, a weird tech on Joel, a couple of missed shots--and all of a sudden the bottom fell out.  We let Houston off the hook completely.  Then we let Houston get ahead.  The rest of the game was simply a fight for survival after that.

There will be a lot of ink spent on the last few plays of this game but the bigger point to me was the first half.  There's a technical basketball term for the way the Blazers played offense through the first 30 minutes of this game.  The first word is "chicken".  I'm not going to tell you what the second one is.  Depending on your regional dialect you may replace that first word with "horse" and still not lose the meaning.  It was like buying a ticket for Frost/Nixon, making a wrong turn somewhere, and ending up at a Pauly Shore film festival. 

The typical possession started with Steve Blake dribbling the ball for an extended period, atypical of him and certainly a bad initial sign for the offense.  Then Blake, perhaps having made progress inside, perhaps not, would dump it to somebody twenty feet from the hoop. 

--Sometimes it was LaMarcus, who would hesitate for a couple seconds and then choose between making a move to get five feet closer before shooting or just outright shooting from there.  Either way he was covered.  Either way more bounced out than in.

--Sometimes it was Brandon.  He would drive a little bit more but Houston flat-out committed three guys to clogging the lane anytime the Blazers got inside, especially so with Roy.  So Roy would get stuck and have to bail out to somebody else who then shot against the clock, long and covered.  Or Roy would sometimes skip the drive and just shoot.

--Sometimes the pass recipient got a screen.  Sometimes Blake even got a screen before he passed off.  Few of them went anywhere.

The sum total of all of the work, effort, and passing was a contested 20-footer more often than not.  The Blazers didn't just lack aggression, they were anti-aggressive.  At one point it got so bad that I pretty much assumed the team had given up.  It was just plain pathetic.

On the defensive end the Blazers did a good job of fronting and doubling Yao from the start.  They managed to keep him mostly out of the game except on the boards.  However doing this left their defense teetering on the edge.  The Rockets forced the issue by going through Aaron Brooks.  The Blazers never got comfortable defending him all night.  They didn't look like they trusted Blake so they'd shade over consistently, flat-out sending help as soon as Brooks started to drive.  The help often came from the power forward position, no doubt a plan of the Rockets.  As soon as Luis Scola's man (later Carl Landry's) left Brooks flipped one neat pass and the Rockets had an open look.  Combined the Houston power forwards ended up 13-22 for 29 points.  That wasn't our power forwards getting beat straight up.  It was our defense getting stretched beyond its limit, crumbling, and them picking it over.

The Blazers also got pounded on the boards early.  No hope of controlling tempo there.

Naturally Houston took more trips to the line.  With Portland hucking and chucking there was no hope of drawing extra points the easy way.

The one guy who seemed to have it going early was Rudy Fernandez, who kept us within (distant) shouting distance with his three-point shooting.  Other than that, the first half and the opening of the third quarter were pretty much a waste.

You may think I'm being harsh here but honestly, it was just as described.  Houston did a couple of things extremely well.  They shut down the first option on all of our plays and they did a good job of getting a man back to cover the recipient of the bail-out pass.  That's all they had to do.  We seldom saw a third pass made even though the Rockets were vulnerable to it.  We seldom saw anybody moving except the guy with the ball and whoever set a screen for him.  On the other end we saw guys making the right moves more or less, but without confidence or aggression.  Everything was slower and more tentative than it should have been.  The Blazers were watching and thinking as much as they were playing.

And the thing was, the Rockets finally had a Houston-like offensive effort themselves.  Other than the times we made it easy for them they didn't take fantastic shots.  They didn't bowl us over in this game.  Any defense at all brought misses.  But we couldn't take advantage nor could we keep from overbalancing every third play and letting them free for the shot, drive, or offensive rebound.

After writing the textbook "How to Lose a Playoff Game Without Even Trying" for the first part of the game we finally got a spark with around 9:00 to go in the third.  By this time the Rockets had a 17-point lead and looked to be roasting us over a spit.  It started with Greg Oden, who came in, established position inside on offense, and started playing some of the best defense on Yao Ming I've seen.  Though he got tagged with fouls, some of them foolish, Greg really played amazingly tonight.  With him occupying space in the middle all of a sudden the outside opened up.  Blake hit a three with 8:00 to go in the period.  Brandon Roy made a jumper in the next possession.  Then LaMarcus hit as well.  Houston called a timeout to adjust but the next four possessions were Greg dunking, Greg dunking again, LaMarcus dunking, and Travis hitting a three 20-footer...all of them off of Steve Blake assists in one of the few bright runs for Blake tonight.  As the offense got rolling the defense also became more energetic.  Pretty soon we're making one of those famous Blazer runs.

The energy stayed high through the end of the third and the fourth quarters.  The Rockets hit shots to stave us off, but those were isolated events.  The overall momentum swung seriously Portland's way.  The offense still wasn't perfect.  We still saw bad shots, this time coupled with turnovers.  The jumpers were a little more open, though.  Plus Brandon Roy, having suffered through a difficult game, started coming alive inside.  At that point you thought we had a legitimate shot.

Portland managed to cut it to four with a Steve Blake three-pointer with 5 minutes left.  Houston responded with a three and a couple made free throws, pushing the lead back to 9 and prompting a Blazer timeout with 3:19 left.  Things looked to be lost when the resulting play finished in a shot clock violation for Portland but Luis Scola coughed up the ball on the ensuing play, ending in a Roy layup.  After a free throw and a brilliant tip by Brandon the Blazers were back within 4 and Houston was the team in need of a timeout with 1:25 left.

After running down the clock some Scola hit a dagger jumper for the Rockets with 1:02 remaining.  Portland was now down by 6 and in need of quick scoring.

This is where the game fell apart.

The Blazers ran 17 seconds off the clock to get Brandon Roy a contested jumper from 8 feet, which missed.  Roy got his own rebound and dished it to Travis for a long jumper, which also missed.  Greg Oden rebounded that miss and the Blazers called timeout.  32 seconds remained in a 6-point game.  30 full seconds had run off the clock while Portland tried to get the ball through the hoop and it still hadn't happened.  The biggest problem was the leisurely pace on the initial shot...time which would end up costing the Blazers dearly.

The Blazers took 9 more seconds to get up their next shot.  It was a three by LaMarcus and it went directly in.  It was now a one-possession game.  But with a hair less than 24 seconds on the clock Portland could no longer think about playing good defense and getting the ball back to tie.  They were forced to foul.  This was a bad situation, as Houston is stocked with excellent free throw shooters. 

In this case Aaron Brooks was the guy.  The Blazers got lucky as he missed 1 of 2, leaving them down 4.  They got even luckier when Rudy Fernandez, the early hero, came through again, hitting a lightning-quick, leaning sideline three with Kyle Lowry's hand in his face.  Blazers down 1, 17 seconds left.  Brooks was again fouled, making both this time.  But because of the consecutive threes, the Rockets were now up only 3 and the Blazers had 16 full seconds to work with.

Portland had no timeouts left at this point, but with a full 16 on the clock there was plenty of time to get up a decent look.

Or so you'd think.

Instead Steve Blake came down alone and with a full 11 seconds remaining lofted an extremely long, angle-shot 27-footer that sailed in the air like a dying quail and came down like a dead one.  The ball may have been tipped or he may have been touched.  I couldn't tell.  Either way, it was an awful looking shot...more so with that much time left from that distance and tightly covered.  I can only think that maybe he thought he got fouled and was shooting in order to draw the free throws.  Otherwise...ugh.

The Blazers were forced to foul immediately.  They got Shane Battier, who made both.  Now they were down by 5.  Blake quick-dribbled up and this time found himself in the clear as he shot and he drained a three.  Portland was back within 2.  They fouled Aaron Brooks with 2.7 seconds left.  He stepped to the line and drained the first.  He shot the second and...

HE MISSED!  HE MISSED! HE...GRABBED HIS OWN OFFENSIVE REBOUND?!?  Granted it was a weird miss off the bracket and to the side, but this was the final insult to all of the self-inflicted injury for Portland.  After all of that...the tragedy of the early game effort, the hard-fought comeback, the blown chances late...the Blazers finally had one, last long-shot gasp.  But they couldn't secure a free throw rebound. 

Game Over.  86-83, Houston.

You have to give credit to Houston for doing what they did.  They controlled the boards.  They were more aggressive and got more calls.  They made it hard on Portland defensively.  But for all of that Portland pretty much blew this game.  Three more minutes of focused basketball anywhere within the 48 and we could have walked away with it.  Houston was the bar.  They set themselves pretty high and they didn't move or lower.  But they weren't going to raise tonight either.  Portland could have jumped that bar.  Instead we tripped.

And that's why the "Argh."

Individually Greg Oden and Rudy Fernandez deserve major, major props in this game.  They gave everything they could.  Oden even directed traffic out there for a brief moment.  He came to play and looks like he's in charge...an attribute few Blazers are carrying right now.  LaMarcus Aldridge had some nice defensive moments but never got rolling offensively.  Brandon Roy had some defensive lapses and didn't play aggressively early but eventually got into the swing of things.  As predicted Houston really shut him down and it took him a while to get past that.  Steve Blake had a good statistical night with 16 points and 10 assists but I worry about the offense and defense both.  After watching the game I was frankly surprised he had that much of an impact.  Channing Frye had 6 points in 10 minutes.  Travis Outlaw went 2-11, missed all 4 threes he took, and ended up with 4 points, 3 rebounds, and 2 assists in 31 minutes.  Joel Przybilla had foul trouble and Yao trouble and ended up with 6 rebounds and 2 blocks in 20 minutes.

The coaching philosophy tonight was to save the centers for Yao time, which makes some sense.  It was certainly proven wise in the second half by Greg.  I wonder, though, how we can fail to press an advantage when Yao goes out with foul trouble or for rest.  There's a risk of Greg collecting non-Yao fouls and thus not being ready when we need him, but we have to find a clear edge somewhere and that seems one of the few obvious ones in this series.  I would seriously consider playing Oden against Houston's reserve "centers" next game.  Frye and Aldridge together just aren't as intimidating, don't rebound or defend as well, and don't provide the unique post threat that Greg does.

So...onward.  The Blazers are down 2-1, again having fallen short in an attempt to seize control and now finding themselves in dire need of a win to keep reasonable hope alive.  The good news is that the Blazers have won in these situations all year, just as surely as they have lost in the situations in which they found themselves tonight.  This is all going in a predictable pattern if you've watched the Blazers this year and the pattern says Game 4 win.  The bad news is that this is a risky way to do business.  You can only tread the precipice so many times before you slip and fall in.  Houston has the chops to make the Blazers do exactly that.  Pull out the win Sunday and it's a three-game race to the finish, two of those being in Portland.  Lose on Sunday and you've fallen off of the cliff and are now scrambling to grab any root or branch within reach, hoping beyond hope that it's anchored.

Interesting times.  Tough series.

You can find the Gameday Threads for this game here.

Jersey Contest Playoff scores for the night:

  • Sir-1 59 Total = 136
  • FromAfar 51, Total = 133
  • MavetheGreat 40, Total = 104
  • Tweener 55, Total = 109

Those who want to see what the playoff participants have to face on Sunday can click here.  Remember only the four remaining players should actually enter though.

--Dave (blazersub@yahoo.com)

Comment 154 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

great recap

couple things:

  • I have little trouble with our D on the Houston PFs. Scola is a good shooter, but him shooting 18 footers I can live with. Landry shooting 18 footers I love— not that he can’t make them, but its not a very efficient shot. Today they went in. It happens. The only defensive plays I had a real problem with were the Wafer waltz-down-the-lane jams.
  • Outlaw never hit a 3. You say he did in the paragraph about our comeback after writing the “how to lose…” book.
  • It was a very strong 2nd half effort overall. There were some unfortunate lapses down the stretch, but for the most part I was impressed. Can’t get down 17 again next game though.
  • For me it boils down to the fact that our 3 main scorers were all terribly inefficient. Houston deserves a lot of credit for that, but Roy has to be better and since he’s having to face Battier and Artest, he needs some help from Aldridge and Outlaw. Those two have got to stop coming up small. LMA has to draw some fouls and Outlaw has to hit a couple shots, grab a couple rebounds, something. That’s what we need.
  • Its all about game 4. Win it and we’re a 55/45 (or higher) favorite. Lose, and we’re a 90/10 ‘dog. These teams are evenly matched. No reason we can’t get it done. Make it happen.

by jksnake99 on Apr 25, 2009 12:50 AM PDT reply actions  

Yeah

I mentioned Travis missing every three he took below. I was thinking “long jumper” and typed “three”. Fixed. Thanks.

—Dave

by Dave on Apr 25, 2009 12:55 AM PDT up reply actions  

In order for LMA to draw fouls

he needs to be positioned on the low post. Tonight, we stationed him on the extra high pick and pop MUCH more often than we gave him the ball on the low block. He’s taking those pick and pop jumpers, which he should, but they seem to be coming from about 2-3 feet further back than they normally do. Gotta fix that.

But I’d like to see us post him up more. He didn’t score a ton that way tonight, but he had good looks, didn’t get a couple of calls he should have, and just when it seemed he might get it going (the turnaround from the left block in the 3rd), we never called his number again.

People blame LMA all the time for being soft and living on the perimeter rather than getting down low and posting up, but a big part of that is on the plays being called, not on him

How did you guys win that?
"We scored enough points. We scored 107, they scored 105.
-Nate McMillan Postgame, 3/4/2009

by douglast on Apr 25, 2009 1:00 AM PDT up reply actions  

I second this...
Its all about game 4. Win it and we’re a 55/45 (or higher) favorite. Lose, and we’re a 90/10 ‘dog. These teams are evenly matched. No reason we can’t get it done. Make it happen.

Pontiff of the Pryz for Prez Posse...

by timbo on Apr 25, 2009 9:15 AM PDT up reply actions  

The series

Is for from over. Let’s get Up for game 4!

by Odenrising on Apr 25, 2009 12:55 AM PDT reply actions   1 recs

nice writeup, as always

In regards to this:

I wonder, though, how we can fail to press an advantage when Yao goes out with foul trouble or for rest. There’s a risk of Greg collecting non-Yao fouls and thus not being ready when we need him, but we have to find a clear edge somewhere and that seems one of the few obvious ones in this series.

I couldn’t agree more. I was looking forward to getting Greg low post touches when Yao was on the bench. Instead, he was rarely or never even in the game when Yao was on the bench. I realize this was partly due to fouls, and partly due to the fact we wanted Greg defending Yao, but man, in a series where we struggle mightily to find a matchup advantage, we got to use the ones we can get.

How did you guys win that?
"We scored enough points. We scored 107, they scored 105.
-Nate McMillan Postgame, 3/4/2009

by douglast on Apr 25, 2009 12:56 AM PDT reply actions  

The way Nate worked it in this game

actually worked out better, I think. I’m just not as confident it always will. Or rather I want more because I think that could make the 4-6 point difference we need.

—Dave

by Dave on Apr 25, 2009 12:59 AM PDT up reply actions  

For all the concerns I had

About some of Nate’s moves tonight we stayed amazingly close.

by Odenrising on Apr 25, 2009 1:04 AM PDT up reply actions  

exactly.

If he can ride Joel a bit longer in the first, then it’s more likely that Greg won’t have picked up 2 fouls by the time Yao finally goes to the bench to start the 2nd, which is what happened tonight. But part of that is on Greg as well.

That said, I saw some definate flashes out of Mr. Oden tonight – on both ends. Those two dunks he had around Yao showed power, athleticism, quickness and agility. the slow motions really captured his body control in angling around Yao to get to the hoop. And what can you say about his defense in the 2nd half? It was quite simply, stellar. I actually found myself watching nothing but that battle for entire Houston possesions. Won’t show up in the stats, but Gregory Wayne came up huge tonight.

Dave – thoughts on Rudy playing the final 6 minutes of the game instead of either Blake or Travis?

How did you guys win that?
"We scored enough points. We scored 107, they scored 105.
-Nate McMillan Postgame, 3/4/2009

by douglast on Apr 25, 2009 1:05 AM PDT up reply actions  

Oden

seems to do things all at once. Big leaps in development when presented with a challenge. This series may not be a great matchup this year but It will make us better.

by Odenrising on Apr 25, 2009 1:10 AM PDT up reply actions  

Same here.

Every time Blazers were o nD I found myself watching the Oden/Yao battle for position. I was very impressed with Greg’s movement.

Do not let what you cannot do interfere with what you can do.
-John Wooden
If you train hard, you'll not only be hard, you'll be hard to beat.
-Herschel Walker

Go Blazerss!!! Playoff time!

by DaNoose on Apr 25, 2009 1:29 AM PDT up reply actions  

when he gets a good entry pass

he can do that, the one where the ball gets knocked out of his hand was a result of needing to gather in a tough pass in a crowded area. Greg’s 2nd foul was ridiculous, yao is over the top of greg greg’s hand is on the ball off the rim and he gets called for the foul…

Does anyone know why Pryz got that technical, or blake the game before while houston can change at the officials, battier did it in both games, and not get so much as a warning glance?

Goodbye Deke. The NBA will miss Mt. Mutombo

Support families in crisis in Portland www.give10tell10.org

by PDXBuckeye on Apr 25, 2009 10:40 AM PDT up reply actions  

Blake

Nice recap. I think you might be a little tough on Blake. I too was surprised to see him end up with 10 assists. Travis and LaMarcus didn’t exactly make themselves great targets and the screens up top tonight seemed a bit mushy.

by Engineering Problem on Apr 25, 2009 1:05 AM PDT reply actions  

If we had somebody that could get in the paint and guard his own man...

Blake is a big reason Houston can make a tough cover on Roy. He has very little ability to get his own shot, can’t run a fast break to save his life, and everybody comes over to give him help on defense. This is the one position that needs a serious upgrade.

by ralphzillo on Apr 25, 2009 8:15 AM PDT up reply actions  

Exactly

Steve is a great guy: heady, competitive, and makes reasonably good decisions with the ball, but PG defense is a huge problem that keeps this team from being at the elite level. Blake is OK against about half the PGs in the league, but when he goes up against ultra-quick or extra-strong PGs, we are in constant trouble. The team can often cover for his lack of quickness, but it does so at the cost of leaving other guys open and puts our bigs in constant danger of picking up cheap fouls.

Sergio is clearly not the answer.

Bayless shows defensive potential, but is greener than an Oregon forest in spring, and has even farther to go as a distributor.

Bayless needs to step up over the summer, or the Blazers need to go shopping.

by upper left corner on Apr 25, 2009 8:38 AM PDT up reply actions  

nobody on this team,

save Sergio, can run a fast break. There is a reason we have the slowest paced offense in the league. I don’t imagine that this team spends much team working on the break.

by Blazin' on Apr 25, 2009 12:47 PM PDT up reply actions  

we have players who could do well on the break:

Rudy, Travis, Batum, Webster, Aldridge are all above average lane runners and finishers on the break. Aldridge in particular has a huge advantage at his position if we get out and run. Our problems running the break are related to:

1) we don’t “leak out” wings, instead we have them come back to ensure we get the rebound
2) no one on the team knows how to throw an outlet pass, which is compounded by point guards who come back to get it rather than start breaking up the court
3) The only point we have who is adept at running a break barely ever plays.

If you look at when we do successfully run (before the playoffs of course), it is almost always on steals and blocks and very rarely on rebounded misses

How did you guys win that?
"We scored enough points. We scored 107, they scored 105.
-Nate McMillan Postgame, 3/4/2009

by douglast on Apr 25, 2009 7:49 PM PDT up reply actions  

I think we need to be realistic about Blake's limitations

Why is Mike Barrett such a Blake homer? He said Blake “had a great game.” Are you kidding? Blake made a few shots in the second half, but he was abysmal for two and a half quarters: couldn’t buy a basket, pounded the ball, hesitated in making decisions, and as usual needed loads of help to keep Brooks and Lowry from the paint.

by upper left corner on Apr 25, 2009 8:45 AM PDT up reply actions  

we don't make the comeback

without blake last night…

Goodbye Deke. The NBA will miss Mt. Mutombo

Support families in crisis in Portland www.give10tell10.org

by PDXBuckeye on Apr 25, 2009 10:42 AM PDT up reply actions  

that could be true

but i feel the game would have been much closer had blake not turned it over couple of times in the third.

by hardgay on Apr 25, 2009 1:06 PM PDT up reply actions  

the dude has one of the

best turnover to assist ratios in the league…you those trunovers were killers, but it happens to everyone…there were any one of a hundred or more mistakes that cost us that game, mistakes made by blake, outlaw, aldridge, pryzbilla, oden, roy, frye, mcmillan, fernandez, batum..they all made them, if perfection is your mark of success you will be a somewhat unhappy fan…

Blake is part of what has gotten us to this point, he ain’t perfect, nobody is. Could there be a better point guard for this team? yes, is there one out there we can actually get and not cripple our cap in the next two years when contracts on some of our key players come open? that is the question…

for the time being i am going to stand behind Blake because he is our guy and he has been key in getting us into this playoff run.

Goodbye Deke. The NBA will miss Mt. Mutombo

Support families in crisis in Portland www.give10tell10.org

by PDXBuckeye on Apr 25, 2009 1:55 PM PDT up reply actions  

all that being said

that last shot was very dissappointing

Goodbye Deke. The NBA will miss Mt. Mutombo

Support families in crisis in Portland www.give10tell10.org

by PDXBuckeye on Apr 25, 2009 1:58 PM PDT up reply actions  

You know, I had those same thoughts about Blake...

Here we were in the 3rd qtr of the 3rd game and he hadn’t done much of anything positive on offense and I – despite being a Blake defender – was about to give up on the guy. After all, he was being completely outplayed by a 2nd year guy. But then he finally started playiing when Oden came in. Now, if he can continue to play at that level from here on out the Blazer should be okay. If he reverts to the first 2.5 games played of the playoffs then I’ve seen enough.

Spanish Main: The point of departure for enormous wealth in the form of gold, silver, gems, spices, hardwoods, hides, alley-oops, assists and three pointers.

by LaughingJon on Apr 25, 2009 3:30 PM PDT up reply actions  

Too tough on Blake?

Despite the stats, and a few bright spots, I thought Blake crystalized why he’s not the starting PG on a championship contender. First, he’s not a good defensive point guard and he never will be. The reason that’s a problem is that he’s also not a good offensive point guard. I like Steve, but if he’s dribbling around for 10 seconds per possession, that probably means the offense is stinking. Badly.

Also, let’s come to grips with this reality: right now, at least, Brandon is not a good defensive player either. Maybe it’s because he has to exert too much energy on O. Either way, you can’t expect to compete for titles with a one dimensional point guard whose only good NBA skill is knocking down wide open threes. If you’re going to have that kind of PG next to Brandon, he’s got to be at least an above average defender.

This is less of a big picture issue, but obviously, Steve’s “shot” for three with 11 seconds was absolutely inexcusable. I just can’t possibly imagine what could have possibly been going through his head. Did he think there was less time than there was? I guess. But there’s no excuse for that. Rudy basically had fire balls coming out of his butt, he hadn’t hit the rim all game, and he just buried a three with a hand in his face sprinting away from the bucket. As the point guard, YOU HAVE TO TRY TO GET RUDY A SHOT THERE. I am blown away by how dumb that shot was. One of the worst Blazer plays of the year.

Q: Is Greg favoring his knee?
Frye: He favors dunking on your head, that's what he favors.

by KP Corleone on Apr 25, 2009 9:46 AM PDT up reply actions  

Sadly, you might be right

Q: Is Greg favoring his knee?
Frye: He favors dunking on your head, that's what he favors.

by KP Corleone on Apr 25, 2009 12:04 PM PDT up reply actions  

Only if your metric is points

I would take Rudy and Greg’s performances over Steve’s any day.

Steve’s inability to hit anything in the first half enabled the Rockets to swarm Brandon and caused Steve to be very hesitant with open looks. When Steve’s shot isn’t on the team struggles particularly with a team like Houston that plays ferocious team defense.

by upper left corner on Apr 25, 2009 12:19 PM PDT up reply actions  

Great recap Dave

I’m not really sure why I pointed this out, but for some reason, this game had a ton of parallels to the Philly-Orlando game.

Philly is up big, only to give up a big comeback to Orlando, only to lose at the end. (The end was different. But the giving up the big lead was pretty similar.)

I think what this young Blazer crew (and Orlando too) hasn’t figured out that raising intensity comes at a cost. You can do it for 5 or 10 minutes at a time. It’s hard to do it if you don’t have that intensity from minute 1.

If the Blazers don’t learn how to push an opponent for 48 minutes by being consistently excellent, they will be a frenetic “young” team for practically forever.

I wouldn’t be worried until this team starts doing it next season though.

Evil Cowtown Inc: Screwin' Suckaz over since Nineteen Eighty-Five.....

No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....

by pookeyguru on Apr 25, 2009 1:06 AM PDT reply actions  

I pointed out the parallels at the Dream Shake

Not here. I forgot that. Whoops!

Evil Cowtown Inc: Screwin' Suckaz over since Nineteen Eighty-Five.....

No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....

by pookeyguru on Apr 25, 2009 1:07 AM PDT up reply actions  

I was most impressed with Greg in this game. It was the best performance fronting Yao I have seen all season.

Combined with Joel, they kept him to 7 points (3 off free throws). Amazingly good.

That stop and go by Roy is straight sick. I'm calling him "The Flu" from now on. - Wendell Maxey

by Norsktroll on Apr 25, 2009 1:10 AM PDT reply actions  

Buy and hold

Next year’s Blazers take this game.

by Engineering Problem on Apr 25, 2009 1:18 AM PDT reply actions  

ditto.

There was one play where Travis took it into Yao and someone else and took a contested jumper, maybe 7 ft from the basket. Yao had left Joel under the basket and I found myself screaming, “Joel, Joel, Joel”, but the pass never came. The shot bricked off the rim to a Rocket.

Argh indeed.

Do not let what you cannot do interfere with what you can do.
-John Wooden
If you train hard, you'll not only be hard, you'll be hard to beat.
-Herschel Walker

Go Blazerss!!! Playoff time!

by DaNoose on Apr 25, 2009 1:36 AM PDT up reply actions  

trout has

not been himself this series. He has had little impact on either end of the floor. I question Nate’s decison for playing him 30+ min while rudy having one his best offensive games playes 22min. I think Nate pulled Rudy after Battier hit that rediculously deep 3. Neither player is great on D, and in my opinion you gotta go with the hot hand. some games that might be Trout and games like today it was Rudy.

by remmer7quack on Apr 25, 2009 3:07 AM PDT up reply actions  

Rudy getting pulled

Did anybody else see Rudy throw his towel down and being visibly upset at being sent to the bench? I didn’t blame him. I thought it was a bad move. Especially considering how hesistant, inconsistent, and reluctantly Travis is playing. Rudy was playing hard and with a “veteran” presence that was unintimidated by the limelight. Not to mention he was red hot and the only Blazer hitting cordage. I feel for ya Rood.

I AM A PORTLAND TRAIL BLAZERS SUPPORTER.

by bow4meow on Apr 25, 2009 7:16 AM PDT up reply actions  

Agreed

Terrible move only playing Rudy 22 mins. Rudy was the only guy on the team playing consistently well on the offensive end. Nate sometimes sticks with a predetermined plan no matter what even when it seems obvious the plan has to be altered. It was apparent before this game and it’s even more apparent now. Trout is pretty much useless in this series. He has done nothing except get confused and toss up unaggressive bricks, and he will continue to do so.

Q: Is Greg favoring his knee?
Frye: He favors dunking on your head, that's what he favors.

by KP Corleone on Apr 25, 2009 9:52 AM PDT up reply actions  

I mentioned this in the game thread, but the coaches have got to stop treating Rudy like

some rookie 3-pt shooting scrub. He’s a skilled veteran with tons of big game experience. Rudy and—surprisingly—Greg were the only ones who looked cool and confident out there. And I don’t even want to discuss why Rudy wasn’t in at the end. I love Nate, but that was a mistake.

It's spelled "PRZYBILLA."
vanillathrillagorillaprzybilla

by RenoBlazerFan on Apr 25, 2009 10:12 AM PDT up reply actions  

No question

Rudy and Roy are the only two guys on this young team who have proven that they have the ability to elevate their games in big moments on a big stage. Rudy has barely missed in this series, and his comments after game one were telling. He has to be viewed as a leader on this team, right now, and Nate’s stubborn reliance upon a woefully incapable Trout is more than a little annoying.

Q: Is Greg favoring his knee?
Frye: He favors dunking on your head, that's what he favors.

by KP Corleone on Apr 25, 2009 10:18 AM PDT up reply actions  

link to comments?

How did you guys win that?
"We scored enough points. We scored 107, they scored 105.
-Nate McMillan Postgame, 3/4/2009

by douglast on Apr 25, 2009 7:52 PM PDT up reply actions  

exactly

I still think we could utilize Rudy’s skills a lot more when he is in there too. The guy is a fantastic passer, yet we almost never put him in position to make plays. I’d love to see him and Oden or Aldridge run some pick and rolls. He’s truly a dual threat in that setup.

How did you guys win that?
"We scored enough points. We scored 107, they scored 105.
-Nate McMillan Postgame, 3/4/2009

by douglast on Apr 25, 2009 7:52 PM PDT up reply actions  

we were all yelling

For the Gregzilla Lma Roy and Rudy lineup in the end at our house…anyone else?

by runanjum on Apr 25, 2009 1:11 PM PDT up reply actions  

Trout is a nervous fish

This guy just can’t calm down and play a game. Plus his lack of fundamentals- like following your own shot – becomes painfully obvious once the game gets more intense. The playoffs are separating the wheat from the chaff.

by ralphzillo on Apr 25, 2009 8:17 AM PDT up reply actions  

Travis wasn't the only one not hitting the boards

but yeah, the playoff pressure must be getting to him, which is odd, because he was so clutch so often in the regular season.

by MiledAnimal on Apr 25, 2009 1:54 PM PDT up reply actions  

Yao was visibly tired throughout the 2nd half and especially in the fourth.

I was really hoping to see them take more advantage of that somehow. I think fighting Greg was definately wearing on him.

Do not let what you cannot do interfere with what you can do.
-John Wooden
If you train hard, you'll not only be hard, you'll be hard to beat.
-Herschel Walker

Go Blazerss!!! Playoff time!

by DaNoose on Apr 25, 2009 1:33 AM PDT reply actions  

Yes. Only Greg still doesn't regularly exhibit the post moves to take advantage of that.

The dribble-push-dribble-push-dunk and up-and-under he used against Bynum would have come handy. Instead he tried to go baseline around Yao or score over him, which is futile since Yao can block those just by standing there and taking his arms up.

That stop and go by Roy is straight sick. I'm calling him "The Flu" from now on. - Wendell Maxey

by Norsktroll on Apr 25, 2009 1:42 AM PDT up reply actions  

Agreed with Greg's post move repertoire.

I feel like we could’ve used our pace better against Yao though. Yao was the last guy down the floor most of the time in both directions. Our big men should’ve beaten him down the court offensively for a powerplay, hockey style. At least if I was Nate, I would’ve been pushing them towards that.

Or maybe even try the twin towers at that point.

Just arm-chair coaching as usual. I feel like we can beat this team. Good game though.

Do not let what you cannot do interfere with what you can do.
-John Wooden
If you train hard, you'll not only be hard, you'll be hard to beat.
-Herschel Walker

Go Blazerss!!! Playoff time!

by DaNoose on Apr 25, 2009 1:58 AM PDT up reply actions  

Very true.

When I came here (in 2004), guys like Nick (Van Exel) and Damon, they were a breath of fresh air for me,'' Przybilla

by Nick Van Excellent on Apr 25, 2009 3:37 AM PDT up reply actions  

By the end of the game the Blazers were the better team.

I’m not sure about saving Greg to play against the smaller bigs. He seems to get in foul trouble with quicker smaller players. One reason he may be so good on Yao is that Yao plays at a slower speed.

The one thing that did grate on me, and I’m not one to criticize coaching much, was Outlaw getting 30 minutes and Rudy getting 20. In this game, Rudy clearly had the hot shooting hand and was getting in the passing lanes on defense, making some contribution at least. Outlaw was ineffective at either end. Nate’s decision on playing time baffled me.

by raoulduke on Apr 25, 2009 2:01 AM PDT reply actions  

Nate seems to

Have a hard time leaving his comfort zone. So far I am not impressed with Outlaws playoff performance. I too thought Rudy needed to be on the court. As far as Oden he has abused small centers a PF’s all year.

by Odenrising on Apr 25, 2009 2:06 AM PDT up reply actions  

He's got to get Outlaw going or we lose the series anyway.

When I came here (in 2004), guys like Nick (Van Exel) and Damon, they were a breath of fresh air for me,'' Przybilla

by Nick Van Excellent on Apr 25, 2009 3:38 AM PDT up reply actions  

Nate has to get Outlaw going

but at the same time, Outlaw has to get Outlaw going. I was thinking about Travis’ relatively slow learning curve. Once Travis gets something down, he’s good at it. Travis’ biggest fear to conquer is but FEAR itself. C’mon Travis, we need you bro!

I AM A PORTLAND TRAIL BLAZERS SUPPORTER.

by bow4meow on Apr 25, 2009 7:20 AM PDT up reply actions  

There is no getting Outlaw going

He’s useless against guys like Artest and Battier. If Outlaw is being guarded by Wafer, than it’s worth having him in the game. Otherwise, he’s good for nothing other than a brick every 5 possessions of so.

Q: Is Greg favoring his knee?
Frye: He favors dunking on your head, that's what he favors.

by KP Corleone on Apr 25, 2009 9:54 AM PDT up reply actions  

J Q's quote from Blakey...
“I feel like I rushed it,” Blake said. “I wanted to get something quick and I didn’t get my feet set. It’s something I will learn from.”

Elizabeth had a partner and he had a rap from the cops, Him and Lenny Suckerpunch were just out Tooling around

by Lizzy Lowblow on Apr 25, 2009 7:33 AM PDT up reply actions  

Feets don't fail me now

Elizabeth had a partner and he had a rap from the cops, Him and Lenny Suckerpunch were just out Tooling around

by Lizzy Lowblow on Apr 25, 2009 7:35 AM PDT up reply actions  

Linkr

Linky

Elizabeth had a partner and he had a rap from the cops, Him and Lenny Suckerpunch were just out Tooling around

by Lizzy Lowblow on Apr 25, 2009 7:40 AM PDT up reply actions  

How about getting your brain set...

As the starting point guard, you are the supposed to be in charge. The clock is stopped. You have plenty of time to access the situation (Down 3 and Rudy is hot). This is your last chance to get even. Not only are you physically lacking in your position, you don’t seem to have much in the brain area either.

by ralphzillo on Apr 25, 2009 8:25 AM PDT up reply actions  

Insightful commentary from Steve

You think you rushed it a little bit, jacking up a contested three off the dribble with two guys in your face, when there were 11 seconds left and one of the best three point shooters in the world is absolutely redhot?!?

Yeah, Steve, I’d say you did.

Good god.

Q: Is Greg favoring his knee?
Frye: He favors dunking on your head, that's what he favors.

by KP Corleone on Apr 25, 2009 9:56 AM PDT up reply actions  

Hoping Bayless develops

Anyone else spend a good portion of the game wishing Bayless had been able to develop into a rotation player this year? He’s obviously not ready yet and I’m not advocating just throwing him into things now… but I couldn’t help but think that what he will bring once he’s ready would have been huge during stretches of this game.

by danielfarrell on Apr 25, 2009 5:43 AM PDT reply actions  

Hoping, but not convinced.

Whether it is Bayless or a veteran, I am convinced that we need a PG upgrade.

by upper left corner on Apr 25, 2009 9:27 AM PDT up reply actions  

Last night's game was frustrating.

You knew Portland could play better than they did in the first half, but you also knew they dug too deep of a hole. I don’t think Portland’s defense did them in and that’s probably the first time I felt that after a Portland loss (or a win sometimes). Portland did a good job of fronting Yao and you probably are ok with Scola and Landry bombing away from the outside.

It was Portland’s offense that was frustrating: ill-advised threes (Blake – why oh why? 16 seconds left…no…don’t shoot it…gah!), bad Roy offense (1 on 4 hoping for a foul) and a general lack of penetration. Houston plays excellent team defense and hardly let Portland get a rhythm on offense. The refs made a couple of weird calls, especially on Przy’s technical, but nothing terribly egregious. We saw a slight regression from Oden not playing off the driver enough, but he did a good job overall.

This game showed glimpses of Portland’s stellar future, but also showed that Portland isn’t quite ready for prime time. I like Steve Blake, but he often plays outside of his game. I like Roy, but he’s not going to get the LeBron call every time he drives. I like Aldridge, but I think he needs to shoot less jumpers against a dude like Scola. Of course, Scola wrote the introduction to the book on flopping (Ginobili is the main author) so perhaps that played into it.

The ending was definitely exciting so, though I’m bummed Portland lost, at least they were in it until the very end. I hope video of Aaron Brooks rebounding his own missed free throw gets them pumped for game four.

by torsoheap on Apr 25, 2009 6:14 AM PDT reply actions  

I forgot to mention

that, though I wished Portland could have avoided Houston, it’s a great matchup and makes for solid, playoff basketball. You can bet that other teams will closely watch how effectively Przy and Oden fronted Yao. It’s hard to make a 7’6" dude disappear on offense, but Portland did it. Yao is a big dude, but his conditioning is pretty poor. I don’t know if he’s worn down from the Olympics or what, but he should be able to play more than a few minutes before huffing and puffing. Like others pointed out above, Portland should take advantage of his lack of foot speed to beat him down the court. Houston has just Yao, but Portland has Przy, Oden and Aldridge. Whichever one is in should race down the court to get post position. Force Yao to “run” or a smaller Houston dude to cover. Przy isn’t exactly an offensive threat, but I’m pretty sure he can dunk over Scola or Landry. Houston is a smaller team so Portland should try to pack it inside.

by torsoheap on Apr 25, 2009 6:21 AM PDT up reply actions  

Getting down the floor

This seems so obvious, why do the Blazers have so much trouble with getting entry passes to the big guys? Seems like we are way too slow getting up the floor, getting position and then getting the pass. Seems like we could do a little secondary break action with the big guys. LMA is a gazelle, and GO has shown some real quickness on some of the pick and rolls. Why can’t we just flip him the ball coming down the lane before Yao gets down the floor?

by upper left corner on Apr 25, 2009 9:34 AM PDT up reply actions  

I agree.

Portland’s offensive strategy is baffling at times. Houston is a fairly short team outside of Yao so there shouldn’t be a problem getting the ball into the post. Scola gets himself into flopping position so Aldridge should be able to get deep.

by torsoheap on Apr 25, 2009 4:21 PM PDT up reply actions  

I hate our offensive style

been saying it all year. I don’t care how efficient it is, I say that is in spite of, not becuase of, our style. Personally, I’d rather risk a few more turnovers if it means we score an easy bucket now and again. How often do we get a secondary fast break dunk like Wafer got last night? Pretty much never. We pull out EVERYTHING, allow the defense to set, and play predictable and methodical high pick and pop like 80% of the time. It’s maddening.

How did you guys win that?
"We scored enough points. We scored 107, they scored 105.
-Nate McMillan Postgame, 3/4/2009

by douglast on Apr 25, 2009 7:55 PM PDT up reply actions  

To me this furthers my belief

That Portland still wins this in 6 or 7.

They came out flat and slow. They finished strong and fast. I expect in the rest of the games this series they will play strong and fast for nearly 48 minutes in the remaining games. I also expect Greg Oden to be in full BEASTMODE for the rest of the series.

I hope I’m right.

Everybody was a baby once, Arthur. Oh, sure, maybe not today, or even yesterday. But once. Babies, chum: tiny, dimpled, fleshy mirrors of our us-ness, that we parents hurl into the future, like leathery footballs of hope. And you've got to get a good spiral on that baby, or evil will make an interception.

by shenanigans on Apr 25, 2009 6:21 AM PDT reply actions  

Yeah.

The first game was a blowout. The second game was close on our home court. The third game was close on their home court.

Hopefully it just maintains it’s current trajectory. Then game four will be a solid win on their home court and game five will be a blowout on our homecourt.

When I came here (in 2004), guys like Nick (Van Exel) and Damon, they were a breath of fresh air for me,'' Przybilla

by Nick Van Excellent on Apr 25, 2009 7:52 AM PDT up reply actions  

Roy

I was very disappointed with Roy in this game. His body language and demeanor for most of the game looked as if he was throwing a tantrum. I was shocked that his speed didn’t increase in the last few minutes and he turned into the black hole sucking everyone in with him. I was actually glad he fouled out, that way we could get some ball movement and some buckets. Needless to say I was incorrect. Don’t mistake me, I’m a huge Roy fan but this game was should not be added to the the Great Roy highlight reel.

Greg had a fantastic game and played Yao very well in the post. I wish Nate would just let him play and if he fouls out he fouls out but give the guy some time and some touches. (same for Rudy, he is rock star and money all rolled into one clutch supermacho muchacho)

Excellent recap Dave

by aLch3m1sT on Apr 25, 2009 6:53 AM PDT reply actions  

Hoping that Roy would foul out ....... ????

Roy had some amazing plays at the end of the game. Going about 3 stories up to tip in a Travis miss. Blatantly and cleanly swiping the ball from Battier at the right baseline. Aggressively following his own miss on the left side of the basket to save a possession. These all occurred with less than 3 minutes remaining in the game.

Also, have you forgotten his last game all ready? The saying “what have you done for me lately” really comes to mind here.

Brandon Roy just destroyed everything in his path. There's your rational analysis -- Dave

Also: COMCAST SUCKS!

by TwoDeep on Apr 25, 2009 11:19 AM PDT up reply actions  

No kidding

Anybody who wouldn’t have LOVED to have Brandon on the court coming down with ten seconds left in a three point game must have amnesia. What more can the guy do to convince you he’s one of the best clutch players in the league?

Regardless of how things are going, it’s blasphemy to suggest you don’t want Brandon Effing Roy on the court when the game’s on the line.

Q: Is Greg favoring his knee?
Frye: He favors dunking on your head, that's what he favors.

by KP Corleone on Apr 25, 2009 11:28 AM PDT up reply actions  

Also

I bet if Brandon were in the game, Steve wouldn’t have tossed up that horrendous excuse for a “shot” (it was more like a crashing plane) with 11 seconds left. Just a hunch.

Q: Is Greg favoring his knee?
Frye: He favors dunking on your head, that's what he favors.

by KP Corleone on Apr 25, 2009 11:29 AM PDT up reply actions  

I was also disappointed in Roy

I was especially disappointed in his defensive effort and hustle in the first half. I think Roy gets a pass too often for his defense—for his lack of consistency on defense. On one fast break, Roy was under the basket but made absolutely no effort to move towards the ball and watched with a pout as Von Wafer dunked. If Carmelo Anthony displayed that type of effort he would be raked across the coals for weeks.

by PoliSam on Apr 25, 2009 11:27 AM PDT up reply actions  

Agreed

It was painfully obvious on that Wafer dunk that Roy wasn’t interested in getting in the mix. He might as well have sent Wafer a formal invitation into the lane for an uncontested dunk.

I was disappointed in Roy’s effort on D, and his “fight” in general – looked like he wasn’t feeling quite right out there.

I’m hoping, as happens with some young superstars, it takes a little longer for them to truly commit on D. Because right now, Brandon is a below average defensive player. At best.

But anybody who was happy he fouled out got what was coming to them when Steve tossed up that wounded duck with 11 ticks left on the clock.

Q: Is Greg favoring his knee?
Frye: He favors dunking on your head, that's what he favors.

by KP Corleone on Apr 25, 2009 11:32 AM PDT up reply actions  

I noticed some bad D from Roy as well

Rudy was pulled for letting Battier hit a deep 3 while he was helping to stop Brooks, but Roy also let Battier hit a much easier 3 earlier in the game. In Roy’s case it was a lot easier to prevent too, he just lost track of Battier and didn’t notice him moving to a new spot.

What is frustrating is that Roy can be well above average defender when he wants to be. He just does not maintain a high level of focus and intensity on defense throughout the game.

by trk on Apr 25, 2009 7:12 PM PDT up reply actions  

I've talked about Brandon Roy's substandard defense all season, which has been a problem for ...

him since his days at the University of Washington. Unfortunately for the Portland Trail Blazers and its fans, Roy is unlikely to ever up his effort on defense at this point in his career — since he’s yet to do it already — so I suggest that y’all just grin and bear it.

by AK1984 on Apr 25, 2009 4:41 PM PDT up reply actions  

Greg is soooooooooo freaking awesome

Go Blazers!!!!!!!!!! Wooooooooooot Wooooooooooooot!!!!!!!!!

by broyposse on Apr 25, 2009 6:53 AM PDT reply actions  

even in a loss, the PTB gained something

Seemed the PTB may have figured out some things albeit a tad late. Oden in the line-up definitely got the team clicking. The energy at both ends of the court was markedly better then the first half laizze-fair demonstration of effort. I believe Portland will carry some momentum and confidence into game 4, and that Houston has got to be recognizing the Blazers are cluing in to what the Rockets are doing.

I also feel Houston cannot continue to torch the nets at the clip they are. It would be nice to show a little perimeter D against Houston’s mid-range jumpers, rather then just allow Scola and Landry wide open looks.

How nice would it be to come back for game 5 tied 2-2?

Go Trail Blazers!!

I AM A PORTLAND TRAIL BLAZERS SUPPORTER.

by bow4meow on Apr 25, 2009 7:28 AM PDT reply actions  

Yeah

I’m pretty stoked about next season. I hope Oden can build on this game and become a force in the middle. I think if he gets a little bit of quickness back, he can stay in front of drivers rather than fouling them from the side.

It was a great game for Rudy and he showed that he deserves more playing time. I would cut back on Outlaw’s minutes (sorry Ann) unless he improves his shot selection and rebounding.

by torsoheap on Apr 25, 2009 8:15 AM PDT up reply actions  

agree with the both of you...

I hated that we drew Houston in the first round, but when I think about it, it’s doing wonders for our team…especially for GO.

He can look himself in the mirror and say he’s going lb. to lb. with a 7 time all star center

Go Blazers!!!!!!!!!! Wooooooooooot Wooooooooooooot!!!!!!!!!

by broyposse on Apr 25, 2009 8:17 AM PDT up reply actions  

Interesting - Houston probably was a good draw for Portland's longterm development...

Win or lose this series, you can bet without a doubt this series will make the Blazers tougher in the long run. There is no more physical team in the league than these guys.

Q: Is Greg favoring his knee?
Frye: He favors dunking on your head, that's what he favors.

by KP Corleone on Apr 25, 2009 9:59 AM PDT up reply actions  

Good point--as frustrating as these playoff losses have been

this is prime time experience for our boys. This is incredibly valuable and will make us much better next year.

It's spelled "PRZYBILLA."
vanillathrillagorillaprzybilla

by RenoBlazerFan on Apr 25, 2009 10:17 AM PDT up reply actions  

the long-term

yep. Let’s be honest, the PTB lack of experience vs. the Rockets playoff experience has been the difference. Youthful exhuberance got the PTB this far, and taking the licks in the playoffs against a really veteran squad can only help the team develop.

Here’s to the future.

I AM A PORTLAND TRAIL BLAZERS SUPPORTER.

by bow4meow on Apr 25, 2009 2:43 PM PDT up reply actions  

Lots of positives in yesterdays game.
  • Our three leading scorers were way off, and we only lost by three.
  • We now know how to defend Yao. Game 2 might have been a fluke, but holding Yao down for two games in a row, and also holding Yao down on his home court. We know how to play him.
  • The young team absorbed the learning experience of playing their first playoff game on the road, and won the last 20 minutes of the game.

Now they have successfully played, Yao the brain trust can turn their attention to fixing Blazer basketball when Yao is not in the game. Clearly when Yao is not in the game, our defense does not have this huge object to demand their attention. Yet in all three games the Yao-less height challenged Rockets have outplayed the Blazers. Our defense should be tighter and the Rockets should struggle to score without Yao.

Rockets play Yao-less for nearly half the game. The brain trust will fix the leaks against this other Rockets team.

by FromAfar on Apr 25, 2009 8:02 AM PDT reply actions  

Also, we were close despite awful transition D.

Lowry and Brooks got to the line too many times by forcing the issue on transition. On one play, Lowry got to the line on a 1 on 3 fast break (if you can call that a fast break) — and this was after we had turned it up in the second part of the game. We can play better transition D. Suspect that mind-sets were still stuck on the offensive end of the floor.

Did we really have any offensive rhythm despite turning our game up in the second half? Agree with Nick Van Excellent, solid Blazer win in Game 4, and blow out Blazer win in Game 5. Will add that either or even both of these games will be works of art.

by FromAfar on Apr 25, 2009 8:20 AM PDT up reply actions  

These are good takes. When you lose by two or three it's tempting to look at

a few bonehead plays and say “they cost us the game” but the fact is that there are bonehead plays by every player in almost every game. Blake’s three stands out because of when it happened, but it didn’t cost the game. There were plenty of poor decisions all around and the team still made it a game.

by raoulduke on Apr 25, 2009 9:54 AM PDT up reply actions  

Yeah. How about his 3 pick and roll assists in a row that led to 3 dunks.

Brandon Roy just destroyed everything in his path. There's your rational analysis -- Dave

Also: COMCAST SUCKS!

by TwoDeep on Apr 25, 2009 11:21 AM PDT up reply actions  

I hesitate to read too much into the 'comeback'

because it contained a whole bunch of lucky threes

Blazer Fan

by leeroyjenkins on Apr 25, 2009 10:31 AM PDT up reply actions  

I can think of only 1

LMA’s can be considered lucky…..but anything by Blake or Rudy should be expected…they are three point shooters for pete’s sake

"You're welcome friend
I love you."
- Tom "Dragline" inHawaii

by 92wastheyear on Apr 25, 2009 11:10 AM PDT up reply actions  

I think this series is the best thing that could have happened to Portland

The players now see what real defense is… hopefully this makes an impact on their defensive effort next season.

It’s also encouraging to see Greg playing so well. If he continues to regain athleticism… watch out.

draft dejuan blair

by Cablinasian on Apr 25, 2009 8:54 AM PDT reply actions  

agreed

Those people who don’t believe in playoff experience and if it matters should watch this series.

Blazer Fan

by leeroyjenkins on Apr 25, 2009 10:29 AM PDT up reply actions  

When (if) the Blazers pull out the series victory

LA will definitely have their hands full. The Blazers would just have finished playing a really physical series and will take it at the L*kers.

I miss Martell. Come back soon!

by mannyfresh1 on Apr 26, 2009 12:01 AM PDT up reply actions  

I feel like we're watching a remake of the Wizard of Oz...

………………………………. this Blazer needs courage — that one needs a heart — the other one needs a brain…

There’s a technical basketball term for the way the Blazers played offense through the first 30 minutes of this game. The first word is “chicken”. I’m not going to tell you what the second one is. Depending on your regional dialect you may replace that first word with “horse” and still not lose the meaning.

So just say it already. YOU KNOW IT’S TRUE…

Pontiff of the Pryz for Prez Posse...

by timbo on Apr 25, 2009 9:02 AM PDT reply actions  

The joke of jokes is that Yao Ming is actually a very placcid post defender. He plays the A.C. Green "Trust In God" Defense...

…………………………………… feet planted on the ground, arms straight up in the air, trusting in god that the shot won’t fall…

Pontiff of the Pryz for Prez Posse...

by timbo on Apr 25, 2009 9:03 AM PDT up reply actions  

LMA secretly wants to be Channing Frye, that's the problem in a nutshell.

Need to get rid of the role model and find a better one this off-season…

Pontiff of the Pryz for Prez Posse...

by timbo on Apr 25, 2009 9:04 AM PDT up reply actions  

draft dejuan blair

JUST DO IT.

draft dejuan blair

by Cablinasian on Apr 25, 2009 9:07 AM PDT up reply actions  

LA is never going to be a power player, but he can still be effective inside

LA’s key is not to try to muscle his way around on the inside (you can see that is not working too good in this series). Rather he should be using his quickness to get open. There is too much stand-still post up- which takes up too much of the shot clock and clogs the middle for Oden. Of course if you put Aldridge in motion you need somebody that can pass it to him.

I think we will see Rudy starting over Blake next year, but that requires a decent back-up for Roy and moving 2 or 3 of our 2nd rate PGs.

by ralphzillo on Apr 25, 2009 5:57 PM PDT up reply actions  

LOL--good analogy

It's spelled "PRZYBILLA."
vanillathrillagorillaprzybilla

by RenoBlazerFan on Apr 25, 2009 10:18 AM PDT up reply actions  

Biting but insightful

Harsh, but disturbingly and brilliantly accurate (for this game, at least).

Q: Is Greg favoring his knee?
Frye: He favors dunking on your head, that's what he favors.

by KP Corleone on Apr 25, 2009 10:01 AM PDT up reply actions  

Just for one game, just for one game...

(We hope.)

Pontiff of the Pryz for Prez Posse...

by timbo on Apr 25, 2009 6:01 PM PDT up reply actions  

Real shame Houston and Portland matched up in the first round

I would have liked nothing more than for this to be a Conference Finals series. But that is just wishful thinking and my dislike of the Lakers shining through…

Portland being such a good comeback team and Houston’s habit of losing a handle late in the games will make each of these games interesting. I hope all you Blazers fans realize that your future is brighter than any other team in the league.

Good luck in game four. I think it’s going to be good.

by pj.ibi.est on Apr 25, 2009 10:21 AM PDT reply actions  

Cool Houston Rocket fans are cool

Will you tell your friends to stop saying “Portland sucks” at games? We don’t say “Houston sucks” though we did foolishly say the refs sucked in game 1and it somehow mattered

Blazer Fan

by leeroyjenkins on Apr 25, 2009 10:35 AM PDT up reply actions  

Yeah, that was pretty weak

There is a big difference between a team fan, and a fan of the sport. I don’t condone that type of thing, especially with a team that plays solid, real basketball.

As a fan of the sport, I love seeing a young team take off. The Blazers fight hard, and they play honest. I love my Rockets, but that’s no reason to detract from the game by being obnoxious.

Then again, I do talk a lot of smack about the Lakers…

by pj.ibi.est on Apr 25, 2009 7:26 PM PDT up reply actions  

I can't wait to hear what LMA's excuse will be today

And there wasn’t much else to be encouraged about last night. I hope our favorite team steps up their focus, effort and intensity in game 4. If not this series is over, raising some troubling questions about why some of our ‘main guys’ are disappearing when it counts.

Blazer Fan

by leeroyjenkins on Apr 25, 2009 10:27 AM PDT reply actions  

Lots of positives in this game

There were some highs and lows in this game, but I love how the Blazers don’t give up. Yao was exhausted at the end, will he be able to be back in form with only a one day break?

by BlazerGal on Apr 25, 2009 11:08 AM PDT reply actions  

All true,

But I wasn’t really expecting the Blazers to do very well their first time in the playoffs. I thought every game might be like the first game. The second game made me proud. The first playoff game on the road was close with Roy, LMA, and Travis having off shooting nights. Why? who knows. That probably won’t happen again. The team made mistakes on two plays in the final run. So uncharectoristic that it probably won’t happen again.

The plusses of this game for the future outway the final score of the game. Oden used Ming. Rudy is money. This in the first playoff game on the road. Wow. Redemption coming or not, this game was a signal of better things to come. Much better. A better playoff game on the road this year? Yes. A better season next year? Yes, and that is saying something. A better playoff season next year? Yes.

One final note, I think we can blow Houston out on Sunday. If that happens, look out.

I could be wrong now. But I don't think so!

by Kampeska on Apr 25, 2009 11:44 AM PDT reply actions  

This team is growing up fast

I remember watching the Drexler-lead teams get bounced from the playoffs year after year, usually in the 1st round and too often in a sweep. Some of those teams played some amazingly clueless basketball and it wasn’t until Terry and Buck and Jerome showed up that the Blazers started playing consistently smart ball.

This year’s Blazers, young as they are, are already smarter than many of those teams. You can see Brandon and LMA and Greg processing what’s happening and applying it to the next game, while Joel and Rudy already seem to “get it”. Just one or two better decisions last night and Portland shocks the Rockets and wins that game.

Ron Artest alone has more playoff experience than the entire Blazers starting 5, but you still see him making some truly bonehead decisions out there. I don’t expect newbies to have everything wired, but I really like how quickly most of these guys are climbing the learning curve.

I also like our chances on Sunday and I flat-out looooove this team!

by dmacb on Apr 25, 2009 1:17 PM PDT up reply actions  

The remarkable thing to me was how the Blazers actually managed to

make this game so close after starting out so horribly. It was so disheartening to watch our falied offense during the first half. Lot’s of good analysis above. As has been well explained, we have so much room for improvement (with this roster) that hope is quite alive. We have a number of mistakes, and successes to hopefully learn from, and make the difference in game 4.
I didn’t hear any more detail on the LMA “fammily issue”, but I do wonder if that might have been a factor in taking his head/heart out of the game.
Rudy was the saving grace that kept us in this game, really rising to the occassion. If we would have stolen the game, it would have almost been “unfair” (the NBA, where unfair happens…). Anyway, still very hopeful. We really just have to take one in Houston (at this point). Really encouraging how we have had success controlling Yao, after the way he destroyed us in game one. Our fight is alive.

by Berkeley on Apr 25, 2009 11:48 AM PDT reply actions  

Some of the game photos are really nice reflections of the players feelings, see link above

Roy scratching his head, Travis biting his jersey, …

That stop and go by Roy is straight sick. I'm calling him "The Flu" from now on. - Wendell Maxey

by Norsktroll on Apr 25, 2009 11:57 AM PDT reply actions  

more Rudy, less Travis

Magneto was right

MEMO TO KP-GET BIRDZILLA!

by WhiteRabbit on Apr 25, 2009 12:20 PM PDT reply actions  

Team Offense and who's hot.

In all the conversation about how this person has got to get going, or how this person is hot, Ya’ll are missing the forest through the trees.

WE NEED TO GET GOOD LOOKS!!

We have the shooters (Travis included) to make enough of those good looks to beat Houston. Because our defense is playing strong enough to keep us in it. And Houston has some psychological weakness in the latter stages of a game. They like to leave the door open.

And how do you get good looks?

WE NEED TO LEARN HOW TO CATCH AND PASS THE BALL!!

I am frustrated about this, because it is given lip service by coaches and players. And where we are hurting is in the fundamentals, not sophisticated talent stuff, in the very basics of how to get the ball quickly around.

There are 2 players on this team that understand the catch and pass: Sergio and Rudy. Every one else needs a period of “evaluation” after they catch the ball before they pass: It goes like this:

CATCH. PAUSE. ASSESS. TAKE ACTION.

There is an alternative to this, to be employed at times in a game in order to rotate the defense:

CATCH. PASS.

LaMarcus and Travis are the worst offenders.

Brandon tends to do this as well, but Brandon is his own story. A one man offense. Unafraid of the 1 v 4 approach to offense.

Makes me pissed at Nate.

by Blazin' on Apr 25, 2009 1:06 PM PDT reply actions  

I think you need some perspective

The Blazers were the NBA’s #1 offense on the season, but are going against an elite defense with exactly the right matchups to make it tough on the Blazers.

The idea that only Sergio and Rudy understand how to catch and pass the ball is ridiculous.

Our offense is obviously far from perfect, but you need to realize that everybody struggles to score on Houston.

by jksnake99 on Apr 25, 2009 1:16 PM PDT up reply actions  

I call 'em like I see 'em

But I’m glad Jk, that if my perspective varies from yours, you have the generosity to bring me back to the right path.

by Blazin' on Apr 25, 2009 1:22 PM PDT up reply actions  

didn't mean to be rude, it just seems like you don't realize/appreciate how good the Portland offense has been this year

and how good Brandon Roy has been as an individual.

I think its important to give some credit to the Houston D.

by jksnake99 on Apr 25, 2009 1:27 PM PDT up reply actions  

if you'd like to talk about this, jk,

respond to what I was saying in my comment, not to my lack of perspective. Nowhere in my comment did I say that Portland had a poor offense. I made a series of points none of which you responded to directly.

1. The question of players needing to “step up” overlooks the fact that we struggle to get good, in rhythm shots against Houston. When I say in rhythm, I am talking about the tendency of guys to hit shots when they come off of a pass.

2. We need to collaborate offensively to get these shots.

3. Passing is a key to collaborating offensively.

4. One way to attack the defense is getting them to rotate through quick passing.

5. We fail to explore this route of attack because our main players (save Rudy) pause and assess after catching the ball.

by Blazin' on Apr 25, 2009 1:40 PM PDT up reply actions  

I don't necessarily disagree with those points

I objected to the tone of your original post, which suggested that know more about offense than Nate, who has coached this team into the NBA’s #1 offense.

Your tone indicated that you feel LaMarcus, Travis and Brandon are poor offensive players and, more than that, that players not from Spain don’t understand offense.

That’s the impression I got.

If I got the wrong impression, I apologize.

by jksnake99 on Apr 25, 2009 1:46 PM PDT up reply actions  

No apology needed, jk

This is a sports blog. A place where people express their opinions about the team. I think it is understood that just because we have some idea of how the team could improve or be improved does not mean we think we are more capable of being general managers or coaches.

Nate Mcmillen is not threatened by me or my critique. And if I am wrong or nearsighted, one of the benefits of coming here is to come away with a broader perspective. You can best do that by responding to the meat of my arguments.

That said, I believe it is ultimately more important that we are courteous to each other here than deferential to the coaching staff.

by Blazin' on Apr 25, 2009 2:07 PM PDT up reply actions   1 recs

I like what you are saying...

and I wouldn’t want to get into a post argument with you anyhow!

I thought that we were really getting that ball movement you refer to at the end of the season (I believe the game against OKC, which plays poor defense of course, but against Denver too).

It seems that playing against Houston so far we have forgotten that notion yet with them packing in the paint it would seem like a logical and natural approach. I hope that we see improvement in that phase of the game… I was sure we had made some headway.

Roy does admit that he should have distributed more last night… it surprised me that he and the coaches didn’t predict that they would key in on him and try to take charges etc.

by QuebecBlzrFan on Apr 25, 2009 2:48 PM PDT up reply actions  

I think they did realize that.

And designed some plays to involve a 3 rd player. We saw them in the opening minutes. Unfortunately, the shots didn’t fall and we lost confidence in this approach. That’s where the youth comes in. It takes mental discipline to run something new when you’re falling behind on the scoreboard.

I don’t know. There’s probably some very good reason that we don’t try to pass the ball around. It may very well be that two quick passes in succession throws everything else about our offensive sets off. Rebounders and shooters set up for the drive to the basket. It may be more complicated that it seems to do something as simple as making two consecutive passes.

by Blazin' on Apr 25, 2009 9:03 PM PDT up reply actions  

Anyone surprised by this series?

I feel like everyone has played like I imagined so far. I think I gave Houston too much respect for their offense when it was obvious they were just really hot from the perimeter the first 2 games. I liked how the defense stepped up in the 2nd half.

The way to beat Houston is to play fast. Make Yao run back on defense so we can take advantage of him not being in position. Unfortunately that’s the Blazers weakness and every offensive strength is Houston’s defensive strength. Really bad matchup in the 1st round. I’m glad the boys are fighting tooth and nail.

No matter what happens this series, I’m happy about the playoff experience.

I fear for the day Paul Allen is no longer the owner of the Blazers.

He needs to reproduce soon so we have an heir in succession.

by blzrfan on Apr 25, 2009 1:36 PM PDT reply actions  

distinction

is it weakness or tactical choice?

This perplexes me. There is no reason we cannot push the ball up court. There is no reason for Brandon Roy to bring things to a standstill every time he touches the ball. These are choices.

Either

1. Nate does not think increasing the pace is a tactic worth exploring versus Houston.
2. He has a difficult time communicating that to Brandon.

by Blazin' on Apr 25, 2009 1:47 PM PDT up reply actions  

or

3) Brandon is an elite player who’s strengths are in the halfcourt offense when he creates plays off the dribble and Nate/Brandon wants to play to the strengths of the team’s best player, even against a difficult matchup.

by jksnake99 on Apr 25, 2009 1:50 PM PDT up reply actions  

now you're responding to the argument

Good point.

But, here’s the thing: Why must it be an either/or?

The more tools in the toolkit, the more adaptable the team. I well know how useful Brandon off the dribble is. It’s our number one tool. But there is no reason that playing with some tempo cannot be in the toolkit.

Interestingly enough, in the first 3 or 4 plays of the game last night, Portland came out with a passing attack and a more uptempo tone. Nate was trying to anticipate the ultimate limitation of depending solely on Brandon and LaMarcus.

And I thought it was very promising.
But the shots didn’t fall.
And because Portland has not worked this offensive approach, it is hard for them to sustain it now in the face of adversity.
But instead of falling back to the one on one approach of Tuesday night, they just flailed at playing a team offensive approach.
Partly, in my opinion, because of the point I was making above.

For whatever reason, this team lacks fundamentals and instinct for team offense.

by Blazin' on Apr 25, 2009 2:00 PM PDT up reply actions  

I think you have a good point

In order to win more consistently in the future and succeed offensively against EVERY matchup, Portland needs to diversify its offense. That’s fine.

I still have trouble criticizing the team for preferentially going with what has worked so well for the whole season.

To me, LaMarcus is the guy that has to score in this series. He’s the player who needs to get it going. Travis and Brandon are facing defenders with the ability to render them inefficient (in Roy’s case) or useless (in Travis’ case). We know Aldridge can score on Scola— we need to see it more consistently.

by jksnake99 on Apr 25, 2009 2:06 PM PDT up reply actions  

I concede that it is probably

impossible to radically change our offense now. But it is frustrating to watch, because I believe we are one quick pass away from getting some good looks.

Brandon talked about it the need to move the ball better in the post-game last night. But he seems to think it is going to come out of a kick-out.

Maybe I am completely off base here, but I feel like they are missing something critical and basic: the second pass in rhythm. boom-boom. Not boom…..boom……boom

by Blazin' on Apr 25, 2009 2:14 PM PDT up reply actions  

I vote for this one.

Roy isn’t that great in a running game, but if Aldridge can run down the court and dunk all over Scola and Landry before Yao makes it to halfcourt, who cares?

by torsoheap on Apr 25, 2009 4:26 PM PDT up reply actions  

I'm glad to see Mike Rice is catching flack for this.

Oden has two straight empahtic dunks against the large Rocket center from China and he says something like, “They may have found a little chink in the defense”.

Yao! That could be mistaken as a racist statement.

Spanish Main: The point of departure for enormous wealth in the form of gold, silver, gems, spices, hardwoods, hides, alley-oops, assists and three pointers.

by LaughingJon on Apr 25, 2009 3:37 PM PDT reply actions  

In case

you havent noticed each time they’ve tried to run the rockets have been able to get back on defense. So its not players not wanting to run but just that the rockets are able to defend that as well. My only criticsim of Roy is that he wasnt aggresive enough in this game in the first half when the team was out of sorts offensively. As for Roy looking tired and lazy on defense you have to understand that he was in foul trouble and that he had to work much harder this game with artest and battier being very physical with him grabbing and pulling him as they fight through screens. When they start to fall apart offensively like they did in the first half i wish they would just throw it down to Oden. We have to use him more if we want to win this series because other than Roy everyone else is a jump-shooter. If Roy is going to be defended like he was tonight no one else will be able to create their shot other than Oden. Whats sad is that this last game was probably the longest he’ll be able to stay on the floor this series. I doubt the refs let Oden bang like they did this last game.

by DeeDop on Apr 25, 2009 5:08 PM PDT reply actions  

I have yet to hear a good reason

why reversing the ball against the Houston defense is not a good tactic to create openings for our shooters and drivers. I would love to see two consecutive brisk passes in a row. Houston extends its defense to pressure that first pass. the second one is the one that will create opportunity.

by Blazin' on Apr 25, 2009 6:37 PM PDT up reply actions  

Brooks' Penetration

The one constant in all 3 games has been Aaron Brooks’ ability to school our less athletic point guards. Nate needs to fix this. We’ve shut everyone else down. He needs to put Bayless in the game to D-up on Brooks. He is the only guy who is as athletic as Brooks if not more so. I just think stopping Brooks is the key to winning this series.

by erikgg on Apr 25, 2009 6:45 PM PDT reply actions  

Brooks is wicked quick, but makes poor decisions when pressured.

As a rockets fan, I think Bayless could have more success against Brooks. I liked that the Blazers team never quit, and was fighting all the way. I look forward to a more entertaining basketball

by Kari on Apr 25, 2009 7:00 PM PDT reply actions  

an experts take on the refs

“There was a lot not to like about this game. Dick Bavetta’s crew continued to let defenses get away with rough, foul-laden play under the guise of “jostling for position,” and coupled with Houston’s continued refusal to understand that it boasts a 7-6 guy with skills in the low post, this completely took Yao Ming out of the game.

Sure, he missed a few turnaround jumpers, but you try hitting them while getting a two-armed shove in the back as you leave your feet. Kind of helps to deny the whole “squaring your shoulders”-thing. I hate this. If Yao did that to Joel Przybilla on the other end, the Houston center would have fouled out by halftime. I don’t blame Joel for anything, it’s his job to see what he can get away with, but I wish the post play was cleaned up." – kelly Dwyer

http://sports.yahoo.com/nba/blog/ball_dont_lie/post/Behind-the-Box-Score-where-Detroit-has-had-it?urn=nba,158932

by wiggins12457 on Apr 25, 2009 7:30 PM PDT reply actions  

Dick Bavetta

sure is perky for a guy his age, though. Did you guys notice how light on his feet he is? He’s kind of built like Fred Astaire too!

by Blazin' on Apr 25, 2009 9:15 PM PDT up reply actions  

Kelly evidently missed

all those times when Yao came into contact with people finishing at the rim and nothing was called when most any other center, including Portland’s two, would be whistled in a heartbeat. It evens out.

—Dave

by Dave on Apr 26, 2009 6:03 AM PDT up reply actions  

last.

Fearthesword.com: "There is no doubt that the long layoff, combined with the ease of the first two rounds had the Cavaliers a bit tired in the 4th quarter."

by Cablinasian on May 20, 2009 11:53 PM PDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

The ultimate coverage and analysis of the Portland Trail Blazers.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
The Blazers Future Regarding Free Agent Signings
Small
Thunderous Manboobies
Img_0878_1__small
Why do we hate LaMarcus Aldridge?
Small
Oregonlive "journalists" 2 new posts...same old drivel
2474796688_7cdc78828f_o_small
Greg Oden Suffers Life-Ending Injury; Gets 3-Year Extension

Recent FanPosts

Small
How can the All-Star game be more fun and competitive?
Small
Earl Boykins!
Small
LaMarcus Aldridge about to become the 10th highest scorer in Blazers franchise  history
Small
New trade that gets us a new point and a three point shooter
Small
Portland getting.....
Small
The Sun Behind the Clouds: Blazers still on track.
Blazers_small
What are we missing?
Red_blazer_logo_small
The Felton Trade, Linsanity, and the PG Position 1 year from now
Small
Effort?

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

FanShots

Quick hits of video, photos, quotes, chats, links and lists that you find around the web.

Recommended FanShots

Blazers Broadcasters Mike Barrett and Mike Rice re-enacted NBA referee Scott Foster's controversial goaltending call on Portland Trail Blazers forward LaMarcus Aldridge, who was defending Oklahoma City Thunder All-Star forward Kevin Durant, during this week's edition of Blazers Courtside. Remarkably, no one was injured during the taping of this segment.

Original video of the play here. 
Quotes from the players and coaches here. 
The NBA admitting it got the call wrong here. 
Dave's  extended thoughts here. 
BlazersMakr's FanShot: Major Vegas action on OKC prior to tip here. 
Audio of Chad Doing of 750 AM The Game going HAM on Foster here.

OK, that should just about wrap up the goaltending discussion.

Courtside video via Blazers Broadcasting cameraman John Curry.

-- Ben Golliver | benjamin.golliver@gmail.com | Twitter
In 2008 Tim Donaghy indicated that Scott Foster was a ref that also fixed games
Blazers Owner Paul Allen Ranked No. 3 American Philanthropist In 2011
Rhino
I'm sure you've all heard the news by now that I'm having a scope on my...

Recent FanShots

LaMarcus Aldridge Needs Support Around Him
LaMarcus Aldridge Finds Out He's An All-Star With His Teammates
Congratulations to Portland Trail Blazers forward LaMarcus Aldridge, on his first All Star selection.

As seen on www.trailblazers.com
AWoj: Aldridge an All Star
It's pretty clear that the season is over already ;)
Double rainbow of sadness:

1) JBay is getting shorter
2) We never got to see him with a mustache

I miss you tiny raptor man.

via The Basketball Jones http://blogs.thescore.com/tbj/2012/02/09/things-of-note-for-february-9-2012/#more-34561
CRAZY stat from Houston game
NBA MVP Rankings... LMA @ #10
Celtics interested in Rondo - Gasol swap? ...
Batum - Top 10 NBA Sixth Men

+ New FanShot All FanShots >


Editors

Kitten_small Dave

Headshotsmall_small Ben Golliver

Lead Moderators

Getfuzzy-satchel_small Timmay!

Bucky3_small Cablinasian

Authors

Plainlc_small Storyteller

Moderators

Lamb_small T Darkstar

Small douglast

Terryporter_small prezofdeath

Small usmcr3049

Lrg_magpie_small Corvid

Wallpaper_small geoffm