Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Devils Beat Rangers, Head To Stanley Cup Finals

Game 3 Preview: Blazers vs. Rockets

Sometimes the most basic truisms are also the most apt, and one of the basic truisms about the playoffs is that seven-game series are all about adjustments.  We're going to see plenty of them tonight.

From the Blazers' perspective the basic gameplan remains largely the same:  rebound, deny Yao, mix and match defenses, play the offensive aggressively and with confidence, play up-tempo so as to not let the defense set, move (reverse) the ball around so as to make the Rockets (particularly their interior guys) chase when defending.  For the most part that's how they won Tuesday night.  The approach doesn't change just because the venue did.

However within that broader approach there will be new emphases.  The Blazers are going to have to react to the adjustments the Rockets will have made since Game 2.

Offense is critical for Portland in this series.  Houston will have noticed Brandon Roy and LaMarcus Aldridge combining for 46 shots on Tuesday night while the rest of the team combined for 28.  They'll also factor in 20 free throw attempts for the two stars and 16 for everyone else.  They're going to pick their poison when deciding who to defend.  You're not going to see as much single coverage as you have the first two games.  You're going to see Roy and Aldridge getting mobbed like they were the Beatles and the Rockets defenders were pimply-faced girls.  (If you're under 20, replace "Beatles" with "Jonas Brothers" and you'll get the picture.)

There's a simple counter to this strategy.  It carries many names.  Some call it "Steve Blake", others "Rudy Fernandez".  Some dub it "Travis Outlaw" while a few name it "Greg Oden".  (Nicolas Batum?  It's a long-shot, but maybe.)  Each approach has merit.  The idea is that the supporting cast has got to step up offensively this evening.  Blake and Rudy have to make their threes along with a few incisive passes.  Travis has got to be able to score one-on-one. He's also got to show more of that active defense he played the other night.  Greg needs to be available for quick catches and dunks plus mop-up duty.  Drain a few long balls or get a couple dunks and the defense has to revert.  Start bricking or even hesitating and the jaws of the trap will close.  If the Blazers turtle up and only send Brandon peeking out of the offensive shell tonight they're going to get squashed.

On the defensive end Portland has seen two vastly different games.  Houston keyed the offense on Yao in the first game.  He had an amazing night and they never looked back.  They barely looked Yao's direction in the second game.  Frankly their offense screamed, "Heat check!  We suspect we can beat you playing any way we please."  They couldn't.   A couple players had amazing offensive nights but they still lost.  The lesson is going to be pretty easy to hammer home to them given the disparity in results:  When Yao touches the ball first everybody prospers.  When he doesn't it doesn't matter if everybody else prospers.

The Blazers have not yet had success in a game where Yao got a lot of shots.  They're going to have to figure out how to do that because Houston playing any other way for the rest of this series would go down as a colossal blunder, especially should they happen to lose.  Fronting him is the basic strategy, probably coupled with bringing quick help when he puts the ball on the floor.  It's not so critical that you limit Yao's actual scoring.  You want to make him work hard to even catch the ball, take shots deeper out on the court, and expend a lot of energy whatever he decides to do.

With Dikembe Mutumbo out the Rockets are particularly vulnerable at center.  They've got a host of good big men but outside of Yao nobody they have should be able to handle Greg Oden.  Oden may spend some time on Yao but his key use will probably be as the huge guy off the bench.  Against Houston power forwards he'll have a chance to post up, to roll and dunk, and most importantly of all to grab offensive rebounds--another aspect of the Blazer offense which has been lacking and needs revival in order for Portland to prosper.  Wearing down Yao is the key.

To that end the Blazers will need to continue involving Yao in screen situations.  Draw the big guy outside.  If you do rebound and get the chance to run, do so.  Make sure Yao never gets to stand still on the court defensively.  Pretty soon his offense will become more stationary.  After that he'll tire anyway.  This is when Portland has to make good.

As we discussed in yesterday's post about officiating, it's is critical that the Blazers get deep penetration and finish strong.  The Blazers do need to be confident taking the open shot but if every shot is a jumper they're going to lose out on valuable extra points and even more valuable foul pressure on the Rockets.  The Blazers have been in the penalty in a bunch of quarters in this series while Houston had fouls to burn.  That can't happen on the road.  Constant foul shooting is one of the few things that could make Artest and Brooks as effective as Yao in affecting a game, as they'll drive mercilessly and pick up the freebies.  Portland needs to be ready if the officiating favors the home team at first.  No matter what they must force the refs to make calls their way.  That means driving stubbornly.

Summary:

  • Look for Outlaw, Oden, Fernandez, and Blake to get more shots and make more of a difference.
  • Do everything you can to run Yao around on defense and make him battle for position and the ball on offense.  Points from him won't kill you.  Easy points from him followed by equally easy points for everybody else as your defense compensates will.
  • Use the Oden matchup to control the boards when Yao sits.
  • Drive aggressively on offense.  Get the Rockets in foul trouble.

Being on the road is a particular challenge for this team but after the hard-fought battles of the last two games my guess is the Blazers won't need crowd energy to get motivated.  One or two shoves or holds ought to get their ire up enough to compensate for the general lack of support in the arena.  If that causes them to play nastier, so be it.

Tonight is more or less a freebie for Portland as far as the series.  They would rock the momentum of the series by winning it, but few expect them to.  If they do lose there's still Game 4 to steal a win back on the road.  The problem is that Portland has not dealt with new experiences well this season and they've played much better with their backs against the wall than they have when they had a chance to be more proactive and seize greatness on their own terms.   If they want to win this series they're going to have to alter that trend.  The competition is too good and the precipice too narrow and steep to bank on last-ditch reprieves.  You can't count on winning any given game of this series, let alone one on the road.  If you put yourself in a spot where you have to win three straight it doesn't matter how much grit and moxie you show...odds are one of those games will bite you.  Even forcing yourself to have to win the next game is dicey.  The Blazers could stay alive and certainly eventually take the series if they won Game 4.  They can go into the driver's seat again if they win Game 3.  There's a difference.

The proper approach to this game is to be loose and relaxed enough that you play your game without fear (you have some cushion now and the pressure is on Houston to win both of these) but yet be focused and intense enough to perform well (you can nullify their blowout win and put them back on their heels tonight).  Hopefully the Blazers have it down.

Check out the doings over at TheDreamShake.

Anybody who wants to see what the Jersey Contest Playoff participants have to deal with can look here but please don't enter unless you're in the playoffs.  (Only four people are.)

--Dave (blazersub@yahoo.com)

Comment 208 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

No matter how old you are..

No one should "replace “Beatles” with “Jonas Brothers”’ in any situation.

by BlazerBen on Apr 24, 2009 1:47 AM PDT reply actions   3 recs

Go BLAZERS

Rudyculize: The act of Rudy making others look slow, dim and generally oafish.
http://www.myspace.com/y5k

by Y5k on Apr 24, 2009 1:53 AM PDT reply actions  

can I get a woot-woot?

Rudyculize: The act of Rudy making others look slow, dim and generally oafish.
http://www.myspace.com/y5k

by Y5k on Apr 24, 2009 2:01 AM PDT up reply actions  

toot toot

"The brownies,'' Fernandez said after the game. "The brownies are good for me to make three-points.''

by Sabonis4Ever on Apr 24, 2009 2:04 AM PDT up reply actions  

woooooooooooot woooooooooooooooot!

Go Blazers!!!!!!!!!! Wooooooooooot Wooooooooooooot!!!!!!!!!

by broyposse on Apr 24, 2009 11:37 AM PDT up reply actions   1 recs

+1

Tonight felt like the day you open the mail and receive an acceptance letter to your dream school: the University of Playoffs. - Ben Golliver, Apr 15 2009

by 22baylor on Apr 24, 2009 12:04 PM PDT up reply actions  

best woot wooter ever

Go Blazers!!!!!!!!!! Wooooooooooot Wooooooooooooot!!!!!!!!!

by broyposse on Apr 24, 2009 1:59 PM PDT up reply actions  

Love how they speed off...

Only to almost sideswipe multiple cars in the other lane. Nice driving! They should audition for a stand-in driver on Vin D’s next flick…

"I don't play for what they write about me, I play for my teammates, my coaches, the city of Portland." - Steve Blake

by RudyisSick! on Apr 24, 2009 2:32 PM PDT up reply actions  

Oden needs 10 shots

And Outlaw needs 15 points.

"The brownies,'' Fernandez said after the game. "The brownies are good for me to make three-points.''

by Sabonis4Ever on Apr 24, 2009 2:04 AM PDT reply actions  

it felt near the end of the last game

that travis was about ready to start hitting. let’s hope so.

ignacio

by ignacio on Apr 24, 2009 2:10 AM PDT up reply actions  

LOVE to see Batum come out and get 10 or 12 points ... or more.

Rudyculize: The act of Rudy making others look slow, dim and generally oafish.
http://www.myspace.com/y5k

by Y5k on Apr 24, 2009 2:14 AM PDT up reply actions  

i don't know

if these guys watched tape from last game, things might be a little different. I think that is part of how the game was called on Tuesday, from the new crew watching what happened saturday…

Goodbye Deke. The NBA will miss Mt. Mutombo

Support families in crisis in Portland www.give10tell10.org

by PDXBuckeye on Apr 24, 2009 2:07 PM PDT up reply actions  

Hope the Blazers don't get rattled

at the beginning of the game. I want them to come out on fire.

I miss Martell. Come back soon!

by mannyfresh1 on Apr 24, 2009 2:40 AM PDT reply actions  

batum need more shot!!don't just do your job,we want more!!!

un mur c’est fait pour l’escalader,marche sur cette putain de muraille de chine!
blazer fan from france.

by malcom X on Apr 24, 2009 5:51 AM PDT reply actions  

This series is not a great fit for young Nicolas

but if he starts hitting his shots he’ll get more time on the court.

by MiledAnimal on Apr 24, 2009 9:26 AM PDT up reply actions  

Should be a lot easier.

Every game they get under their belt against the same team, should make it easier to deflect the rocket barrage.

by CyclonicWinds on Apr 24, 2009 6:30 AM PDT reply actions  

I don't see how..

it should be easier. Shouldn’t it be harder? I’m expecting a solid Rockets win. The Blazers haven’t experienced a ROAD playoffs game yet. It’s going to be electric in the Toyota Center tonight.

Houston by 15.

by Artest4Prez on Apr 24, 2009 7:05 AM PDT up reply actions  

Come On

The Rockets won by 27 in the first game. You’re only going to win by 15 at home? With the home court advantage that is the Toyota Center. Against a Blazers team that hasn’t experienced a ROAD playoff game yet. Come on.

SOME PEOPLE ARE LIKE SLINKIES. NOT REALLY GOOD FOR ANYTHING BUT THEY BRING A SMILE TO YOUR FACE WHEN PUSHED DOWN THE STAIRS.

by MrGrinch on Apr 24, 2009 7:36 AM PDT up reply actions  

It would be foolish...

to expect the Rockets to win by 27 again. I lot of things went right for them that night and they were able to capitalize on good jump shooting as a whole and excellent post play from Yao.

Believe me, I’d love it of the Rockets why by close to 30 again but I don’t see it happening again, which is why I say 15.

I’d also appreciate it if you didn’t mock me about the road game… Portland has lost to Houston twice at home, one of them by a very good margin. I don’t see how they can possibly come in tonight expecting to win.

by Artest4Prez on Apr 24, 2009 7:43 AM PDT up reply actions  

dude we go into EVERY game expecting a win

55 times right so far

""Look. I can touch the rim on my tippy toes.. " – Greg Oden

by LetsBlaze on Apr 24, 2009 8:18 AM PDT up reply actions  

the Blazers have yet to even show up - - -you have seen Roy...and SOME adridge...

you have yet to see even 6 of the 8 cylinders firing…

you’ll notice it when you do…:-)

""Look. I can touch the rim on my tippy toes.. " – Greg Oden

by LetsBlaze on Apr 24, 2009 8:19 AM PDT up reply actions  

If they haven't shown up at home...

where they have a much better record and confidence, then why are you expecting them to show up on the road in a packed Toyota Center?

by Artest4Prez on Apr 24, 2009 8:28 AM PDT up reply actions  

Because the Blazers didn't yet have a really good game with a hot shooting streak in Houston since Roy came on the team

Even longer, probably since Outlaw came on the team. Some night it has to happen. Why not in game 3 or 4?

That stop and go by Roy is straight sick. I'm calling him "The Flu" from now on. - Wendell Maxey

by Norsktroll on Apr 24, 2009 8:30 AM PDT up reply actions  

my thoughts exactly

time to move beyond Houston …we are a better team – - with a healthy McGrady and Mutumbo, not so much….but now? Aldridge loves playing in Texas…

frankly I think the boys are sick of Houston and might just win the next 3 in a row….just a feeling :-)

""Look. I can touch the rim on my tippy toes.. " – Greg Oden

by LetsBlaze on Apr 24, 2009 8:32 AM PDT up reply actions  

LaMarcus might be distracted by the "family matters" he had to attend to in Dallas

Hopefully not, and he can use it as a positive motivation. Hope everything is alright LA.

That stop and go by Roy is straight sick. I'm calling him "The Flu" from now on. - Wendell Maxey

by Norsktroll on Apr 24, 2009 8:36 AM PDT up reply actions  

yeah I was thinking the same thing ...maybe it'll just tick him off...

he’s SOOOOOOOOOOO much better when he is angry

""Look. I can touch the rim on my tippy toes.. " – Greg Oden

by LetsBlaze on Apr 24, 2009 8:38 AM PDT up reply actions  

If I was a Blazer I'd pass on fake trash talk to him...

“hey I heard Scola make fun of your nose….says you run like a {politically incorrect, non-family friendly word for a homosexual}

""Look. I can touch the rim on my tippy toes.. " – Greg Oden

by LetsBlaze on Apr 24, 2009 8:40 AM PDT up reply actions  

hmmmmmmmm....hey, Shav....I got a plan......:-)

""Look. I can touch the rim on my tippy toes.. " – Greg Oden

by LetsBlaze on Apr 24, 2009 8:42 AM PDT up reply actions  

The Houston Rockets are a better team without Tracy McGrady.

It’s like how the Oklahoma City Thunder are better without Kevin Durant.

Why, by the way, are so many folks unwisely enamored with high-scoring, yet defensively inept wing players?

Those type of players pad the stat sheets, but they’re certainly not winners.

by AK1984 on Apr 24, 2009 8:54 AM PDT up reply actions  

You might be right about that...

the law of averages could come into play.

I’m just saying guys, don’t put your life saving on Portland taking this one down.

by Artest4Prez on Apr 24, 2009 8:40 AM PDT up reply actions  

I never bet on sports

except if I follow a referee into a casino

""Look. I can touch the rim on my tippy toes.. " – Greg Oden

by LetsBlaze on Apr 24, 2009 8:41 AM PDT up reply actions  

I don't expect a win tonight

It could be another blowout. Winning Game 4 is more the Blazers’ M.O.

The Blazers could loe every game that they do lose by double-digits. It’s still getting to four first that counts.

—Dave

by Dave on Apr 24, 2009 9:05 AM PDT up reply actions  

i think they will set up a wall to stop brandon

it may take him another game to figure out how to carve up the new defensive scheme, but i have faith he will by game 4.

by appel82 on Apr 24, 2009 9:07 AM PDT up reply actions  

a great wall?

if so we better call up some mongolians

"Howard, he know me" Rudy

by phillyduck23 on Apr 24, 2009 10:24 AM PDT up reply actions  

I still wanna win 4-1

By a combined total of under 27 points. I doubt anyone has ever won a series 4-1 while getting outscored!

by Zaig on Apr 24, 2009 9:11 AM PDT up reply actions  

I agree Dave.

I think Game 4 in more dangerous for Houston, after the Blazers adjust a little playing on the road in the playoffs.

I’m pretty stoked. I got ticked for Game 4. Work on Monday is going to suck haha

by Artest4Prez on Apr 24, 2009 9:19 AM PDT up reply actions  

Travis Outlaw will most likely play like utter crap this entire series, which'll ...

be eerily similar to what went down with Vladimir Radmanovic during the 2005 Western Conference Quarterfinals matchup between the Seattle SuperSonics and Sacramento Kings.

http://www.blazersedge.com/2009/4/16/841135/an-interesting-sidenote-to-this#14314084

Plus, as y’all can check out for yourselves in the above link, I predicted Outlaw’s struggles against the Houston Rockets.

by AK1984 on Apr 24, 2009 8:59 AM PDT up reply actions  

travis' steal and dunk was basically the dagger of the game

his block on von wafer was huge too. He may not be playing his basketball so far, but utter crap is going too far my friend.

by appel82 on Apr 24, 2009 9:01 AM PDT up reply actions  

opps

bad grammar, you get the point though

by appel82 on Apr 24, 2009 9:03 AM PDT up reply actions  

That's Trout's MO though

Have a few awesome plays that allows everyone to forget the rest of the bad stuff.

by Zaig on Apr 24, 2009 9:12 AM PDT up reply actions  

For some reason, folks tend to have a short memory regarding ...

Travis Outlaw’s seemingly obvious flaws. It might be due to my blunt nature, but I frequently pick up on more of those negative qualities of Outlaw’s than those garden-variety optimists are capable of noticing out there.

Y’know, it pays to be a realist than an optimist when it comes to stuff like honesty, self-awareness, et cetera.

by AK1984 on Apr 24, 2009 9:16 AM PDT up reply actions  

Oh, I know that there's no practical use to my skills; thus ...

self-importance isn’t really a problem with me. Despite being relatively intelligent, I’m too lazy and ill-equipped to put those good qualities of mine to productive use.

It’s like I’m a malfunctioned piece of mechanical equipment.

It’s an unfortunate state of affairs, but that’s life. Besides, we can’t all be well-rounded, successful winners in this world.

by AK1984 on Apr 24, 2009 9:40 AM PDT up reply actions  

meh...we all end up getting busy at something

I’m one of the laziest people I know when it comes to things I don’t feel like doing…

Hell its 12:30 on a work day and I’m here…lol..

if you want to be different act different (even if you don’t mean it) …past performance doesn’t need to predict future performance…

geography change helped me to reset and refocus a few times…

fresh environment without others preconcieved notions helps us to change our “self” picture.

Would you believe people pay me for that $@#*???…

""Look. I can touch the rim on my tippy toes.. " – Greg Oden

by LetsBlaze on Apr 24, 2009 9:46 AM PDT up reply actions  

You said it yourself AK

> It’s like I’m a malfunctioned piece of mechanical equipment.

good luck getting the repairs done.

> It’s an unfortunate state of affairs, but that’s life. Besides, we can’t all be well-rounded, successful winners in this world.

but we can all hope to evolve, just as Travis Outlaw continues to evolve as a basketball player. – Elgin

Tonight felt like the day you open the mail and receive an acceptance letter to your dream school: the University of Playoffs. - Ben Golliver, Apr 15 2009

by 22baylor on Apr 24, 2009 12:09 PM PDT up reply actions  

i'm just trying to bust your basketballs...

…but what skills? :-) I’m neither well rounded, nor a winner, and success is in the eyes of the beholder. I’d say both of us are successful in that we obviously have enough free time on our hands to be here, now.

by appel82 on Apr 24, 2009 10:06 AM PDT up reply actions  

Perhaps it is due ...

… to you being an extremely anal-ytical sort of individual.

hakkaa päälle !

by timg56 on Apr 24, 2009 11:45 AM PDT up reply actions  

it's not your blunt nature

It’s your one sided view of things and staunch position that doesn’t let you re think the stats that some formula gave you.

Sometimes its hard to get past things you’re looking for to see the things you are not looking for.

by keepfryealive on Apr 24, 2009 2:00 PM PDT up reply actions  

Even from a scouting perspective, it's painful to view the ...

lack of fundamentals that Travis Outlaw displays out there on the court.

I abhor watching his lack of movement on offense, his lack of passing the ball to open teammates when he’s covered, his constant chucking of ill-advised jumpers, his lack of boxing out for rebounds, his lack of tough man-to-man defense, et cetera.

Y’know, all things considered, I just detest Outlaw’s style of play with a passion—regardless of statistics and whatnot.

by AK1984 on Apr 24, 2009 3:04 PM PDT up reply actions  

lord....I wish I could think of a polite way to tell you to cram your statistics up your....nose...BUT

I HAVE A MATH DEGREE…A WHOLE NBA CAREER IS NOT EVEN A BIG ENOUGH SAMPLE NEVER MIND TWO GAMES>>>>>>

sorry….

couldn’t help myself…

""Look. I can touch the rim on my tippy toes.. " – Greg Oden

by LetsBlaze on Apr 24, 2009 9:02 AM PDT up reply actions  

If Travis Outlaw comes through later in the series, I'll admit to being ...

wrong in my prediction. I’m usually right about all things NBA, although I do make the occasional mistake.

Heck, I thought Shelden Williams would be a top-notch interior defender coming out of Duke — even though I should’ve taken more stock in his relatively short standing reach — alas, I looked like a fool.

Yet, no matter that miscue, I was right in my prediction that Kevin Durant would be a Tracy McGrady clone, I’m right thus far that Jerryd Bayless’ skill set won’t translate well to the NBA, I’m right that Brook Lopez would be a stud when most people though he’d be a stiff, et cetera.

For the most part, I’ve got a pretty good track record on these things.

by AK1984 on Apr 24, 2009 9:07 AM PDT up reply actions  

Most people thought Lopez would be a stiff?

People aren’t very smart…

As for Durant, he is still young, he might learn how to play defense. I’d say the odds are better of him learning to play D’ than Bayless learning to be a PG.

by Zaig on Apr 24, 2009 9:14 AM PDT up reply actions  

brook looked awesome when I saw him in NJ

he will be a force in this league for years…

so will Marc Gasol if he quits smoking and keeps a work ethic..

""Look. I can touch the rim on my tippy toes.. " – Greg Oden

by LetsBlaze on Apr 24, 2009 9:21 AM PDT up reply actions  

Marc Gasol is a pathetic interior defender, which I'm ...

figuring has much to do with his overall poor conditioning and possible lack of worth ethic in that regard. That’s just an assumption, though.

by AK1984 on Apr 24, 2009 9:27 AM PDT up reply actions  

I guess its the mathematician in me...

see…each event in basketball has SOOOO many independent variables (and some would argue co-dependent unmeasurable intricacies on a humanistic, psycho-social level) that prediction based on summary statistics is not dependable…

the best gm’s and horse handicappers even (which would be simpler if it was honest) get their most success by weighting their gut reaction heavily.

It requires thm being present with the subjects and being able to place them in specific situations to gauge reactions…

you might find that you are AWESOME at that…seriously…coupled with your level of interest and ability to recall and organize your ideas and your willingness to put yor self on the line with your opinion you should pursue it as a career path…

but careful about the numbers

""Look. I can touch the rim on my tippy toes.. " – Greg Oden

by LetsBlaze on Apr 24, 2009 9:20 AM PDT up reply actions  

I use my gut as much as my mind, though, for I'm not a pure ...

stat guy like jksnake99. Heck, I get as riled up emotionally even more than some of the most crazed posters around here.

I, therefore, am someone who totally agrees that it takes a mix of statistics, scouting, and ol’-fashioned instinct to wholly analyze a given player’s value.

Now, with regards to making a career out of anything related to basketball, I’m too lazy and don’t always deal with people well in a work environment. Plus, it’s an undoubtedly hard field to enter under any circumstances.

by AK1984 on Apr 24, 2009 9:25 AM PDT up reply actions  

well....get a few sports mgt classes under your belt...coach a youth team..

get your own blog . . . and see…lifes about pusuing your passions…you put alot of energy into this already…ya never know….BB is a large scale international business….

""Look. I can touch the rim on my tippy toes.. " – Greg Oden

by LetsBlaze on Apr 24, 2009 9:32 AM PDT up reply actions  

A few years ago, I attended Green River Community ...

College in Auburn, WA — which started in the fall after I’d graduated from Everett Community College with a basic Associate in Arts & Science Degree — in attempt to enter the field of radio broadcasting.

That was back in 2005.

I was on pace to graduate with a Academic Certificate in Broadcasting — which was a one year, 45 credit program — in the spring of 2006, with an internship set up at 99.9-FM KISW for the “B.J. Shea Morning Experience” to start that fall.

Alas, I failed one of my classes that spring and went into a pretty solid funk in life. Consequently, I headed back up to my hometown of Marysville, WA and moved in with my Grandfather, who’s in his mid-’80s.

It’s the one way my parents would let a 24-year-old bum like me get away without being self-supporting at this point in my life, for by living with my Grandfather we kind of make one whole person. He’s financialy stable, while I’m 100% with it upstairs.

Furthermore, I’m witnessing my younger brother, Chris, succeed from afar where I failed miserably. Yet, luckily for me, I’ve got plenty of time to slack off, let him build up his career in the field of broadcasting, and hope to catch a ride on the gravy train sometime in the near future.

Yeah, I’m definitely not the hardest worker in the world and most certainly not someone who anybody should model their own life after in any way, shape, or form.

by AK1984 on Apr 24, 2009 9:54 AM PDT up reply actions  

AK....thanks for sharing all that ..

Your path thusfar as hard and off track as it may seem – - or may be – - is still enough to have gotten you here in one piece…

If you want to broadcast, that is even more a reason to have a forum . . .blog site web site…just be the radio station…podcast ….record….go ahead and do it …the degree stuff is less important than the person doing the work…

Catch your breath…give yourself a break – - or two – -and pick it up from where you are…

The person who picked up from the start and just ran unimpeded right to where they thought they’d go is rare. From that group, the ones that are unhappy when they got where they thought they were supposed to be usually makes up half the group…

Anyway…I gotta an appt to go to but email me me if you want i’m dr cele ste @aol …fill in the blanks…you know…

""Look. I can touch the rim on my tippy toes.. " – Greg Oden

by LetsBlaze on Apr 24, 2009 10:06 AM PDT up reply actions  

AK at 24

Speaking as a 54-yr-old who is now seriously underemployed in a field that does not really appeal to me very much, here is my unsolicited (and possibly unwelcome) advice.

Now at the age of 24, this is the best time to be doing your soul searching.

CONTINUE YOUR EDUCATION AT YOUR OWN PACE. Do not let time go by without getting those pieces of paper that help you get employment in your desired field. SCHOOL NEVER STOPS and EMPLOYERS DO NOT TELL YOU THIS OR HELP YOU WITH IT.

One foot in front of the other. YOU WILL NOT BE WASTING YOUR TIME.

I wish you the best of luck. When you are evolving and improving and making a better You out of yourself, you will feel better about the whole thing.

Best of luck to your Grandfather too. He may surprise you with some insight on these subjects. – Elgin

Tonight felt like the day you open the mail and receive an acceptance letter to your dream school: the University of Playoffs. - Ben Golliver, Apr 15 2009

by 22baylor on Apr 24, 2009 12:17 PM PDT up reply actions  

I was on the ten-year plan myself...

My turn to offer advice. Turning 25 was a turning point for me, when I realized that once you reach 25, you are closer to 30 than to 20. It sounds stupid, but it was enough to motivate me to return to college and finish 130 hours in two years while working part-time. So maybe you just haven’t found what motivates you yet.

I’m hearing a lot of self-negativity in what you write about yourself. You’re a smart guy, AK. Try to make progress in some (preferably positive) direction, even if it doesn’t look appealing at the time. Opportunities tend to present themselves to folks who are moving forward, and you might like some of them.

by MiledAnimal on Apr 24, 2009 2:21 PM PDT up reply actions  

He has the same job as Nic: Occupy Artest/Battier, rebound and score what you can

The two don’t have to win the series for the Blazers, they just have to prevent losing it by letting those guys run hot. When Travis scored over Wafer, he forced Adleman to bring Battier back who wasn’t much of an offensive threat. Even Roy acknowledged that helped him after the game.

That stop and go by Roy is straight sick. I'm calling him "The Flu" from now on. - Wendell Maxey

by Norsktroll on Apr 24, 2009 9:05 AM PDT up reply actions  

I've never said that Travis Outlaw is completely useless out on the ...

court, for that’d be complete nonsense. I, however, believe that Outlaw’s overall impact when he’s on the court is more negative than postive.

Outlaw doesn’t score efficiently enough, he doesn’t rebound nor pass to his teammates proficiently enough, and he doesn’t defend with enough intensity.

Until Outlaw improves on those facets of his game, he’ll continue to be a subpar sixth man in comparison to his contemporaries throughout the NBA. Unfortunately, though, I think that he isn’t capable of making those much-needed strides.

by AK1984 on Apr 24, 2009 9:12 AM PDT up reply actions  

Trav finished #5 in the 6th man voting

Which tells you “the award thingy” is all about scoring and not overall game, eh?

Maybe Outlaw nation will make the trip from Starkville to Houston this weekend and Trout’s mom will give him some “advice” about rebounding?

My take remains: I see Travis getting squeezed out of PT in 2010 at SF by Batum/Webster and at PF by a new acquisition who will replace Frye (hopefully a vet but possibly a draftee) With this in mind…we should be rooting for #25 to have an awesome playoff series and raise his trade value so KP can put him in a screamin’ deal on draft day

by two4larue on Apr 24, 2009 2:50 PM PDT up reply actions  

I hear you guys, but when Travis enters a game

in the fourth quarter and reels-off several big shots, it demoralizes the opponent. That’s worth a lot, despite his faults.

by MiledAnimal on Apr 24, 2009 5:01 PM PDT up reply actions  

EXACTLY....although there is no metric to measure the motivation Wafer has

to prove us wrong about letting him go

""Look. I can touch the rim on my tippy toes.. " – Greg Oden

by LetsBlaze on Apr 24, 2009 9:23 AM PDT up reply actions  

So far we've played you 5 times

And in 5 games you’re telling me we haven’t seen your team play well? Tell me, what makes you think it’s magically going to happen out of nowhere? So those 3 wins for Houston were just luck because the Blazers “didn’t show up” ?

How about Roy’s ‘Miracle Shot’ ? That’s the only reason we didn’t SWEEP the Blazers in the regular season series.

by UHoustonFan on Apr 24, 2009 11:11 AM PDT up reply actions  

As funny as it sounds, yes, you have not yet seen this team firing on all cylinders in a game against Houston

Of course Houston’s defense has a lot to do with it, but something just didn’t click until now (either LaMarcus had an off-night, or the bench didn’t work).

That stop and go by Roy is straight sick. I'm calling him "The Flu" from now on. - Wendell Maxey

by Norsktroll on Apr 24, 2009 11:15 AM PDT up reply actions  

Yao hit a tough shot right before Roy did

That was also combined with a silly foul unlike any I’ve ever seen Roy commit.

by Zaig on Apr 24, 2009 11:37 AM PDT up reply actions  

no they haven'tplayed well against you yet

""Look. I can touch the rim on my tippy toes.. " – Greg Oden

by LetsBlaze on Apr 24, 2009 12:54 PM PDT up reply actions  

That game also happened in the beginnig of November

the Blazers are a much different team then versus now.

by tingeyga on Apr 24, 2009 1:17 PM PDT up reply actions  

You have a point

But, remember, this Blazers team learns from adversity, and knows what it needs to do to pull out tough road wins. I’m expecting a close game, with a Brandon Roy dagger to seal the deal with a few seconds left.

Book it.

by CyclonicWinds on Apr 24, 2009 8:01 AM PDT up reply actions  

I love how, at every stage of the Blazers' ascent,

the naysayers dismiss and demean them because they “haven’t done that yet:”

  • Getting to 30 wins.
  • Getting to .500.
  • Getting more than 45 wins.
  • Winning road games.
  • Making the playoffs.
  • Getting a top-four seed.

Now it’s you, Artest4Prez, predicting we won’t win in Houston because we haven’t done so the last few times we’ve played there, as if Houston is protected by a magical spell. If we get past the Rockets, it won’t stop there.

  • We’ll be hearing all this trash from Laker Fan, then from whomever we face in the WCF. Then from whomever we face in the championship series.
  • Even if/when we win a championship, we’ll be hearing that we can’t win two.
  • If we win two but not in consecutive seasons, we’ll hear how we can’t win in consecutive seasons.
  • When we win back-to-back titles, we’ll hear that we can’t three-peat.
  • If we win ten in a row, we’ll hear we can’t win eleven.

You like trends, Artest4Prez? Then you will agree that the Rockets are going to lose this series, because they have been unable to get out of the first round since Hakeem was your center, right?

The Blazers are making prognosticating, pontificating Blazer-haters look like a bunch of goofs.

by MiledAnimal on Apr 24, 2009 9:52 AM PDT up reply actions  

You sound pretty full of yourself/your team

Hey lets not forget that your team is still young and that it’s the first playoff series EVER for most of the players on the Blazers. Sure you won game 2 at home in Portland but it was a close contest until the last 3 minutes of the game. Neither of the two games in Houston were really close. You lost the first by only 4 but you had to come back from 17 down to do it.

This mindset of “The Blazers have this series down” and that they’ve “figured Houston out” is ridiculous! If you win a game at the Toyota Center, then we’ll talk about the Blazers’ chances of getting past the Rockets and playing the Lakers. But to be puffed up thinking about the FINALS already? That’s a bit premature isn’t it?

Much Love to the Blazers and their fans..not trying to be disrespectful!

by UHoustonFan on Apr 24, 2009 11:25 AM PDT up reply actions  

nah, you're right

Finals talk is way premature.

draft dejuan blair

by Cablinasian on Apr 24, 2009 11:26 AM PDT up reply actions  

My diatribe wasn't about us making the finals,

as you and UHoustonFan could have deduced from the last three bullet points. It was about naysayers who proclaim that the Blazers can’t do something, which is usually followed by the Blazers doing it. Artest4Prez wrote:

I don’t see how they can possibly come in tonight expecting to win.

I’m just saying no one should be surprised if they beat the Rockets tonight. The Blazers are not a high-school team. They won 54 games in the Western Conference this season — one more than the Rockets. Take them lightly at your own risk.

by MiledAnimal on Apr 24, 2009 1:54 PM PDT up reply actions  

The reason that I was confused

is that in the final four bullet points you used “if” in describing the scenario. As it was absent in the first part of your argument, I was unsure of how to read it… but now that you clarify, I agree with you.

draft dejuan blair

by Cablinasian on Apr 24, 2009 2:34 PM PDT up reply actions  

I wouldn't be making any claims that Portland has ...

 … figured Houston out, until I’ve actually seen it.

However as a Blazer fan – who is on the optimistic side – I also believe that Portland has a 50 – 50 chance of taking this series from Houston. That’s based in part on seeing how well the team has performed down the stretch and a growing feeling that these guys are actually starting to put it all together. At least enough of it to win a first round playoff series.

If I wasn’t a Blazer fan, I might look at the season record between the two teams, the advantage of Houston’s experience (assuming that exists) and perhaps more importantly the experience of Rick Adelman and put the odds of Portland winning the series at 35 – 65, maybe 40 – 60. The other BE’er’s here are correct on one thing – so far this series, Portland hasn’t fired on all cylinders like they were the last month or so of the regular season. That could be a result of the quality of play of the Houston team and/or just how Houston matches up with us. I tend to believe it is more of the first than the second. Which tells me that even if the Rockets continue to play well, improved performance on the part of Portland could still bring them 3 more wins.

hakkaa päälle !

by timg56 on Apr 24, 2009 12:01 PM PDT up reply actions  

Cognitive dissonance in action:
You sound pretty full of yourself.

…not trying to be disrespectful!

Are you a fan of Carmelo “slap-and-backpedal” Anthony?

by MiledAnimal on Apr 24, 2009 1:57 PM PDT up reply actions  

We were within 2 points with :17 to go in Houston.

How quickly you forget!

 That we came back from 17 down doesn’t mean we were out of it, it means we closed a 15 point deficit with less than six minutes to go.

Believe me, it was not the only deficit Portland rallied to overcome this year.

by levelhed on Apr 24, 2009 2:03 PM PDT up reply actions  

Protecting the defensive board

With the fronting defense that the Blazers played, it would appear that Yao should have been free to attack the glass after one of his teammates had shot the ball. Jeff is great at boxing out even after fronting, but the others aren’t. So I was surprised that Yao did not get more ORebs and putbacks.

Houston shot 50% in Game 2, even though their front-line was missing. In Game 3, the front line will be better prepared to take what the defense gives them and they will make more shots. its scary to try and beat a team that shoots BETTER than 50%. It will be very important for the Blazers to rebound the few misses and not let Yao get putbacks.

by FromAfar on Apr 24, 2009 7:47 AM PDT reply actions  

Game 3 is part of the learning curve

Throughout the season the Blazers have been simply amazing in how well they absorb, process and adapt to new input. Not only have they done well in learning from lost games, they have also adjusted well after half-time, which has contributed to several of their come-from-behind wins. [They are not yet experienced enough to adjust during the game, and that will come with time]. This attribute makes the Blazers very, very dangerous in the playoffs!

Game 3 is the first road playoff game that the kids have ever played. It is a completely new experience for them. We might pull it off, but even if we dont, the Blazers will be very dangerous in Game 4. The refs will allow Scola to play more physical “illegal D” on LMA. They will buy Scola’s flops. Brandon is going to be tied up tighter than one of Dave’s fantastic analogies. He will not get the calls regardless of how often he attacks the basket. But they will learn from it and win Game 4.

This is where strength of character comes into play.
Our young Blazers have it in spades.
Win or lose, Go Blazers!

by FromAfar on Apr 24, 2009 8:04 AM PDT reply actions  

Looking forward to tonight's game!

Hopefully Artest will take more stupid shots :)

I am he as you are he as you are me and we are all together.

by Marie on Apr 24, 2009 8:06 AM PDT reply actions  

Portland 12 for 18 from 3 tonight...

Houston – - – start working on your excuses…if I jump shooters are present to night, you will need them…

no one outside our big 2 has had a hot hand yet…..probability says…..it is time…I expect an offensive barrage tonight….

but I’ve been wrong before…

""Look. I can touch the rim on my tippy toes.. " – Greg Oden

by LetsBlaze on Apr 24, 2009 8:24 AM PDT reply actions  

You talk pretty big

But you haven’t won in Houston this year and we’ve played you very well at the Rose Garden. Sticking with Blazers in 5 huh? We’ll see.

by UHoustonFan on Apr 24, 2009 11:04 AM PDT up reply actions  

Lakers didn't beat the Bobcats this year..

But I’d still pick them in a best of 7 series. (An extreme example, I know.)

by Zaig on Apr 24, 2009 11:39 AM PDT up reply actions  

Actually, wasn't that sick B-Roy three point bomb for the win

with 0.4 on the clock in Houston?

"I don't play for what they write about me, I play for my teammates, my coaches, the city of Portland." - Steve Blake

by RudyisSick! on Apr 24, 2009 2:37 PM PDT up reply actions  

Go Blazers!

Looking forward to tonight’s game. I expect the Rockets to play well, especially on defense, but I think there’s a chance they’ll be a little tight on offense. This would be a great game for the Blazers to improve their defensive performance.

I’d love to see Oden stay out of foul trouble. I’m still having a hard time understanding how foul prone he is—but alas, I’d just like to see him play more than 20 minutes.

by PoliSam on Apr 24, 2009 8:25 AM PDT reply actions  

AND ...IF he is going to go after (foul) a point guard...the ball needs to end up no where near the basket..

and the fella needs to get up off the ground when its over…

""Look. I can touch the rim on my tippy toes.. " – Greg Oden

by LetsBlaze on Apr 24, 2009 8:27 AM PDT up reply actions  

Pryz is probably busy dreamng up ways to get under Artests skin...

he seems to enjoy stuff like that

""Look. I can touch the rim on my tippy toes.. " – Greg Oden

by LetsBlaze on Apr 24, 2009 8:29 AM PDT reply actions  

Roy is "the flu". But Pryz is "the white plague" :)

That stop and go by Roy is straight sick. I'm calling him "The Flu" from now on. - Wendell Maxey

by Norsktroll on Apr 24, 2009 8:32 AM PDT up reply actions  

I also have a vision of Yao doing his I'm a veteran I know how to foul you and not get caught thing with Oden

and Oden doing his I’m a rookie, don’t care about fouling you and knocking him on his ass for real.

but thats just me

""Look. I can touch the rim on my tippy toes.. " – Greg Oden

by LetsBlaze on Apr 24, 2009 8:35 AM PDT reply actions  

I found a nice stat to motivate Shav: His career rebounding rate/rebounding percentage is higher than Yao's

Because Yao is an atrocious offensive rebounder ;-)

17.5 vs. 16.5. This year Shav was off the charts in that regard at 30 (offense and defense). It would of course likely level down significantly with more playing time, but for now he is better than Joel and Greg who are both amazing rebounders.

Rebound Rate is the percentage of missed shots that a player rebounds. Rebound Rate = (100 x (Rebounds x Team Minutes)) divided by [Player Minutes x (Team Rebounds + Opponent Rebounds)]

That stop and go by Roy is straight sick. I'm calling him "The Flu" from now on. - Wendell Maxey

by Norsktroll on Apr 24, 2009 8:45 AM PDT up reply actions  

ONe of the things he hates about "garbage time" is that it can mess things like that up...

the flow of the game is artificial…and people don’t really look for real offensive sets …AND don’t contest the other teams shots so rebound opportunities go down…

He is confident that he will have a double double season somewhere before he is done

""Look. I can touch the rim on my tippy toes.. " – Greg Oden

by LetsBlaze on Apr 24, 2009 8:49 AM PDT up reply actions  

times we were having trouble with players like Okur, Kirlienko, Scola even..names elude me...

basically big white guys with good fundamentals….one way to slow them down is with other big white guys with good fundamentals

""Look. I can touch the rim on my tippy toes.. " – Greg Oden

by LetsBlaze on Apr 24, 2009 8:56 AM PDT up reply actions  

Shavlik Randolph should be ahead of both Channing Frye and Michael Ruffin on ...

Portland’s depth chart, which is why I’m baffled to see Nate McMillan place the Dukie on the inactive list thus far throughout the playoffs.

by AK1984 on Apr 24, 2009 9:02 AM PDT up reply actions  

he had no plans for him going into the season and has stuck to his guns

he has seen something in Ruffin that remains unclear to me so Shav is in a suit…

""Look. I can touch the rim on my tippy toes.. " – Greg Oden

by LetsBlaze on Apr 24, 2009 9:04 AM PDT up reply actions  

Mike is amazingly strong - - seemed like a great guy when we met...I'm glad for him that he's here..

gotta be exciting to show up amongst such excitement…He and Channing especially seemed to have hit it off…he’s played with Blake before…he has more experience than…anybody? here…Nate’s there and has a plan…he is in charge…gotta trust that

""Look. I can touch the rim on my tippy toes.. " – Greg Oden

by LetsBlaze on Apr 24, 2009 9:10 AM PDT up reply actions  

The whole experience angle and having a buddy-buddy relationship ...

doesn’t sit well with me, although that’s due to me being driven heavily by results over off-court nonsense.

I don’t entirely blame this on Nate McMillan, however, for Kevin Pritchard should’ve waived Ruffin immediately after the transaction to prevent this from occurring in the first place.

Oh well, it’s only a minor point of contention and not really a big issue.

by AK1984 on Apr 24, 2009 9:31 AM PDT up reply actions  

It all goes back to my Nate is racist idea

He didn’t start Billa until he HAD to
He brings Outlaw in like 30 seconds before Rudy
He tried to play Bayless over Sergio, luckily that failed miserably
Clearly with Blake/Billa/Rudy getting big minutes and Sergio getting minutes at times, he just can’t allow a 5th white guy to play.

by Zaig on Apr 24, 2009 10:41 AM PDT up reply actions  

You can't be serious?!

If you are you need to seek immediate medical attention.

"And once again we can say, it's a GREAT day to be a Blazer."- Brian Wheeler

by lrh86 on Apr 24, 2009 10:52 AM PDT up reply actions  

true

Nate is not so flexible with his “very end of the bench” players.

But we’re starting to see a nice trend of those players moving on to success:
Exhibit a: Von Wafer
Exhibit almost b: Ike’s 32 points

So I think Shav’s time will come.

by Section323 on Apr 24, 2009 9:08 AM PDT up reply actions  

Mike Ruffin is a good rebounder ....

…. solid interior defender and a good locker room guy who has a fair amount of experience.

While I personally would like to see Shavlick get so meaningful playing time, I can understand why they have kept Ruffin activated.

hakkaa päälle !

by timg56 on Apr 24, 2009 12:07 PM PDT up reply actions  

six fouls

Tonight felt like the day you open the mail and receive an acceptance letter to your dream school: the University of Playoffs. - Ben Golliver, Apr 15 2009

by 22baylor on Apr 24, 2009 12:23 PM PDT up reply actions  

Agreed.

At least he should be getting some of Channing’s time (much as I like Frye) just to demonstrate what he can bring to the table.

hakkaa päälle !

by timg56 on Apr 24, 2009 12:05 PM PDT up reply actions  

After what Channing delivered in game 1, I suppose Nate will give LaMarcus all minutes he can handle

Not much room for additional players. I suppose that will shake itself out next season. They are wearing him down if he continues to get 35 – 37 minutes over his career like in the last 2 years. That can’t be the plan going forward when you want him at top fitness in the playoffs.

That stop and go by Roy is straight sick. I'm calling him "The Flu" from now on. - Wendell Maxey

by Norsktroll on Apr 24, 2009 8:56 AM PDT up reply actions  

I've been saying that since November....even tonight Channing should be there pounding on Yao...Ruffin even...

use 18 fouls up wearing him out….why not?

""Look. I can touch the rim on my tippy toes.. " – Greg Oden

by LetsBlaze on Apr 24, 2009 8:57 AM PDT up reply actions  

reasonable idea, but how necessary?

Yao only averages 34 mpg on the season, so if you split time guarding Yao between three or four players, it seems like you’re just playing the less-good players for the heck of it. Obviously, if there’s real foul trouble (like tuesday) then you have to look deeper, but I want Greg and Joel guarding Yao. And it’s not like the FTs are a good result, he’ll make ’em all.

by atomiccafe on Apr 24, 2009 9:09 AM PDT up reply actions  

Yao Ming is an amazing free-throw shooter, so that idea would backfire on you.

Also, Channing Frye is too soft and Michael Ruffin is too short to defend Ming; thus, he’d abuse them like red-headed step children.

It’s times like these that I wish the Portland Trail Blazers had an actual third-string center on its roster. Hell, that’s why I’m behind inviting Robert Swift first to training camp next season. Rasho Nesterovic would be my first choice, but he’ll probably sign somewhere in which he’ll be guaranteed backup minutes at center.

by AK1984 on Apr 24, 2009 9:34 AM PDT up reply actions  

Agreed

Not sure about Swift and Nesty, though. Whoever it is should be able to play PF/C, or at least be stout enogh to guard centers.

Dallas used Bass effectively to front Yao. Someone like that would be golden. (But the problem with Bass is that would want to play more minutes than will be available.) So it has to be someone who desires a ring more than PT, and would be willing to sit until the need arose for PT. (Similar to how Houston kept Mutumbo “under wraps” all year until March, but not exactly.) The guy could play spot minutes during the regualr season. get more playing time if one of LMA/Greg/Przy got hurt and then be ready to perform a Robert Horry-like (but bigger and even more badass) role in the playoffs

by two4larue on Apr 24, 2009 3:14 PM PDT up reply actions  

Yao's better at the line...

than one on the Blazers team. That’s why not.

by Artest4Prez on Apr 24, 2009 9:35 AM PDT up reply actions  

he's real good but would be...third? 4th? on the blazers...

it was rather than just be owned if he is in oine of unstoppable modes…fatigue wold keep his D to a minimum and his minutes down…

""Look. I can touch the rim on my tippy toes.. " – Greg Oden

by LetsBlaze on Apr 24, 2009 9:40 AM PDT up reply actions  

No.

Best free shooters (on the season) for the Blazers:

Blake :84% (63-75)
Fernandez: 83.9% (120-143)
Roy: 82.4% (416-505)

And the drum roll….

Yao: 86.6% (381-440)

I’m not a mathmetician like you LetsBlaze, but that’s pretty compelling evidence.

by Artest4Prez on Apr 24, 2009 9:51 AM PDT up reply actions  

In short..

Adelman would like nothing more than to get Yao to the line as much as possible. Hack-a-Shaq does not and never will work on Yao.

by Artest4Prez on Apr 24, 2009 9:53 AM PDT up reply actions  

seems to put him off his game and wastes his energy

if he’s about to dunk on your face……why not? even at 90% 2 point becomes 1.8

""Look. I can touch the rim on my tippy toes.. " – Greg Oden

by LetsBlaze on Apr 24, 2009 9:55 AM PDT up reply actions  

keeps him out of his rhythm...

keeps him from getting his “touch”…

seems to effect him emotionally as well

""Look. I can touch the rim on my tippy toes.. " – Greg Oden

by LetsBlaze on Apr 24, 2009 9:56 AM PDT up reply actions  

I don't think I buy this line of reasoning.

I’m with Artest4Prez. Putting Yao on the line plays into his strengths. And with either Channing or Ruffin as his primary defender, I’m guessing we’d see a lot of “and ones”.

hakkaa päälle !

by timg56 on Apr 24, 2009 12:11 PM PDT up reply actions  

Any time

you let Yao score without moving you’re doing it wrong.

—Dave

by Dave on Apr 24, 2009 1:05 PM PDT up reply actions  

Hack Yao?

Oh, we’re not gonna hack Yao— We’d go after someone stellar at the line like Chuck Hayes.

by Larry The Croc on Apr 24, 2009 6:07 PM PDT up reply actions  

hmmm.yeah they faded from when i remember...rudy and blake were in the 90's for awhile

those extra 2 or three per hundred hardly stand out

""Look. I can touch the rim on my tippy toes.. " – Greg Oden

by LetsBlaze on Apr 24, 2009 9:54 AM PDT up reply actions  

Yeah..

I can’t remember specifically, but I’d put my money on Roy as the technical free throw shooter.

by Artest4Prez on Apr 24, 2009 10:12 AM PDT up reply actions  

Roy took the defensive 3 second technical last game

We’ve used Blake/Roy/Rudy mainly. It was Blake 100% of the time that he was in until the Clipper fiasco. Now it seems to be Rudy > Roy > Blake. Although in clutch situations they usually go with Roy.

I believe that we’ve had a couple of random ones too. Sergio shot one and if memory serves LMA did as well.

by Zaig on Apr 24, 2009 10:52 AM PDT up reply actions  

I'd say that Rudy's FT% isn't reflective of his actual ability

after the cheap shot from Artest, he went through two weeks when he couldn’t hit a free throw due to his shooting motion being screwed up.

draft dejuan blair

by Cablinasian on Apr 24, 2009 11:18 AM PDT up reply actions  

Not much room for additional players

But there IS room for one more veteran big man on this roster who can backup LMA as well as swing to C when GregZilla are hurt or in deep foul trouble

Obviously Ruffin and Shav are not “that” guy

I’d like to see a guy near the end of his career who wants a ring more than PT. Who would be willing to sit and collect DNP-CDs until he was needed. Then who would come in and kick butt for as long as he is needed. Make it so, KP

Another suggestion Rick Barry made on Canzano’s show the other night. The Blazers need a big-man’s coach for Oden? Hire Clifford Ray this offseason. Ray’s contract is up with Boston and he’s been solid with every group of big men he’s worked with

by two4larue on Apr 24, 2009 3:06 PM PDT up reply actions  

it could happen....Greg doesn't have that oooo yor a legend I better not touch you kinda thing going (ask Lebron)

he has this…you wouldn’t be that good if was here in the paint attitude …..I love it

""Look. I can touch the rim on my tippy toes.. " – Greg Oden

by LetsBlaze on Apr 24, 2009 8:59 AM PDT up reply actions  

greg knows how to win

it is the only thing he has ever done at every level from 7th grade on…

he has that killer instinct…

Goodbye Deke. The NBA will miss Mt. Mutombo

Support families in crisis in Portland www.give10tell10.org

by PDXBuckeye on Apr 24, 2009 12:14 PM PDT up reply actions  

GO BLAZERS

If they continue to try and guard Brandon 1 on 1, he will have to continue to put up 40 point performances. I hope they start doubling so he can dish to open shooters and take some of the burden off.

Golly Gee, I sure hope I didn't huwt anybody's feewings.... sniff...sniff....

I'm an elitist jerk, and I won't lie about it.

The WAVE is bad karma. When we lose, I'll blame it on our fans doing the wave......

by SuperDave on Apr 24, 2009 8:40 AM PDT reply actions  

Dominate the paint

I think that is the only way we steal a game in Houston. The rockets will be comfortable shooting from the perimeter at home. Portland this season has really had some stinkers on the road from the outside.
I hope whatever was going on with Lamarcus flying home to Dallas yesterday is over with and he can come out focused on the game tonight.

I try to help with everything," Fernandez said. "If the coach says go rebound, I go rebound. I work for the team.

""If I'm playing this game to get media and attention, I shouldn't be here," Aldridge said. "I'm here to play basketball, and do what I can do to help this team win."

His stare became blank. It was apparent he was back in that place, on the Rose Garden's logo, picking up Aaron Brooks as the crowd nervously roared.

by Dragonage on Apr 24, 2009 8:41 AM PDT reply actions  

This I can agree with...

but that’s the only chance Portland had of winning the series anyhow so it’s kind of redundant.

by Artest4Prez on Apr 24, 2009 8:43 AM PDT up reply actions  

the lessons of yao

The lesson is going to be pretty easy to hammer home to them given the disparity in results: When Yao touches the ball first everybody prospers. When he doesn’t it doesn’t matter if everybody else prospers.

You’d think this, but this has been true for the entire season. What was the Rockets’ record when Yao scored 20+? They pretty much never lost. And yet they perimeter players never learned they were essentially an unstoppable colossus when they played through Yao.

I think actually part of this is down to Yao. We saw in game 2, when he’s confronted with mixed defenses, he becomes tepid and doesn’t assert himself or demand the ball. This is why he is a 20 ppg player instead of the MVP or the best player in the league. In sum, there’s no reason to expect that Yao will be able simply destroy us, because he’s never been able to sustain dominance in his career.

by atomiccafe on Apr 24, 2009 8:59 AM PDT reply actions  

we have 4 seven footers . . . i'm giving chan and Lma the extra inch because THEY can jump

he cannot keep up for more than 20 minutes a game or so

""Look. I can touch the rim on my tippy toes.. " – Greg Oden

by LetsBlaze on Apr 24, 2009 9:06 AM PDT reply actions  

Yao will be trying to stay out of foul trouble

He wont be going for a lot of blocks. He is very slow when it comes to lateral movements so I hope Roy and the other Blazer gaurds use him as an extra screener when he is in the game.

by Escrote on Apr 24, 2009 9:07 AM PDT reply actions  

Dave, I am curious can you explain...
The problem is that Portland has not dealt with new experiences well this season and they’ve played much better with their backs against the wall than they have when they had a chance to be more proactive and seize greatness on their own terms.

I don’t get what you are referring to… other than the first game of the year and of the playoffs I thought they adapted to injuries, road trips, basically any new twist without much of a negative pattern. As far as the first games I think they were caught off guard and that isn’t surprising to me.

I am expecting new things from Houston and I am curious if they will try to turn the loss of Deke into a positive advantage by using quickness to burn Oden when Yao is out (or some scheme to negate his obvious advantage if they leave him in his comfort zone).

Of course I expect them to try and get us into foul trouble just like we are trying to do to them… GO may be their prime target for this… he seems to have been much better at avoiding them though.

by QuebecBlzrFan on Apr 24, 2009 9:17 AM PDT reply actions  

Pressure

Rockets…
lose this game and they are thinking about yet another first round exit.
They have yet to show they can do anything in the playoffs with Yao.

Blazers…
have exceeded their goals,
they want to win, I want them to win, but there is no pressure to win.

by DucRider on Apr 24, 2009 10:04 AM PDT reply actions  

I find it hard to believe...

that the pressure is on the team who has to hold home court to win the series.

What about the team who’s never played a road playoff game?

Or the rising star who is trying to make a name for himself?

I suppose that’s not a lot of pressure or anything

by Artest4Prez on Apr 24, 2009 10:19 AM PDT up reply actions  

For this game, though

Duc is right.

The Blazers lose this game…no big deal, it’s expected.

The Rockets lose this game…AAAAARGH!

Game 4 reverses completely if the Rockets win tonight though. Then the Blazers would need to win badly to keep the Rockets from getting to three wins and forcing the Blazers to win three straight. At that point the series would be down to a miracle, for Portland and those don’t often happen.

—Dave

by Dave on Apr 24, 2009 10:23 AM PDT up reply actions  

Comma

shouldn’t have been in that last sentence. D’oh!

—Dave

by Dave on Apr 24, 2009 10:23 AM PDT up reply actions  

Trying to make a name for himself?

Pressure?
The team that is always discussed as a title contender in the pre-season, only to go out in the first round every year.
VS
The team that was picked by many to not make the playoffs and by almost everyone else to be 6-8 seed.

The rising star who had no expectations about being a good team until this year.
VS
The guy who has gone 0fer in the first round and isn’t getting any younger.

The pressure is all on Houston. Portland is going to come back a much better team next year, so if we lose it’s no big deal. The Rockets can’t say the same.

by Zaig on Apr 24, 2009 10:47 AM PDT up reply actions  

Exactly

Houston has to win this series.
The Blazers just need to experience it.

by DucRider on Apr 24, 2009 11:52 AM PDT up reply actions  

It's true

Wouldn’t it be great if the Blazers won this series?

But if they don’t: it’s one first-round exit, not completely unexpected. Bravo to the Rockets, they get the monkey off their back.

No pressure on the Blazers. This has been a great season and they have successfully served notice as far as next season is concerned. – Elgin

Tonight felt like the day you open the mail and receive an acceptance letter to your dream school: the University of Playoffs. - Ben Golliver, Apr 15 2009

by 22baylor on Apr 24, 2009 12:29 PM PDT up reply actions  

meh....whats the pressure....throw the ball up lets blaze....whatever

we think about it more than they do honestly

""Look. I can touch the rim on my tippy toes.. " – Greg Oden

by LetsBlaze on Apr 24, 2009 12:58 PM PDT up reply actions  

Blazers Jersey Color

When Portland was at home I was thinking why don’t the fans all wear red to the game… then once the game started, I remembered the Rockets red away jerseys. Well now the Rockets fans are gonna all wear red to the Toyota Center…. WE SHOULD WEAR OUR RED AWAY JERSEYS!!!

Make them pay for wearing red….

ALL DAY EVERY DAY...

by Slopedoug on Apr 24, 2009 10:41 AM PDT reply actions  

The fans...

will think they are disrespecting their team and they won’t be totally focused on cheering as loud as possible…

one can hope…

ALL DAY EVERY DAY...

by Slopedoug on Apr 24, 2009 10:44 AM PDT up reply actions  

We likely will at least once

They look great…

Proud member of Duck nation!

by skywaker9 on Apr 24, 2009 12:28 PM PDT up reply actions  

On Oden''s defensive rebounding

Houston blocks him out with two guys when he is in…we need Outlaw, Batum, and Fernandez to get down there more on the boards to take advantage of that. LeMarcus already does…

Goodbye Deke. The NBA will miss Mt. Mutombo

Support families in crisis in Portland www.give10tell10.org

by PDXBuckeye on Apr 24, 2009 11:12 AM PDT reply actions  

Supporting cast, Passing and Brandon Roy.

Am I the only one seeing a tension between the way we have been running our offense through Brandon and LaMarcus and this notion of the other guys stepping up and scoring?

Or, put another way, a tension between Brandon’s change-up pace and lulling wiliness and the imperative to push the ball in transition and reversing the ball in the half court set?

Brandon tends to use up about 10 seconds of the shot clock ambling up the court and getting positioned to make his move for the basket. Or Steve Blake uses the same amount time running around frenetically before passing the ball to Brandon who then does his thing. Maybe someone who understands this better than I can explain how the guys who depend upon a team offense are going to get good shots?

With the exception of single passes by Rudy, I have not yet seen us briskly move the ball around the perimeter in this series. But if we were to try that, what would it look like?

It seems Houston plays pretty far out on the perimeter, which forces us out of our sets to get the ball around.

I don’t think that kick outs are going to do it…Houston plays the passing lanes quite well and we’ve seen both Steve and Brandon get really pressed when they penetrate.

Brandon has the best shot of intitiating movement and passing because Houston has to respect his ability to get to the basket. But that is not something I have seen him do. Will be interesting to see if Nate has a plan for the anticipated pressure on Brandon. Maybe use the pick and roll as a decoy to set up Rudy and Travis on the wings.

There must be a weakness in that D somewhere!

by Blazin' on Apr 24, 2009 11:48 AM PDT reply actions  

Houston is really really good at closing out on shooters

we have had ball movement, the problem is that they are really good at not allowing good shots by passing it around. However, as Roy and Aldridge showed on Tuesday, they can beat Artest/Battier/Scola one on one.

by cloudydays on Apr 24, 2009 12:01 PM PDT up reply actions  

have to disagree

we have had very little ball movement. I cannot think of a single instance that we have moved the ball all the way around the perimeter. I agree that houston is good at closing out on shooters. But the issue here is passing and moving without the ball. It is getting the ball to someone in a position to do something.

by Blazin' on Apr 24, 2009 12:38 PM PDT up reply actions  

Nate McMillan doesn't know the first thing about coaching a motion based offense.

For whatever it’s worth, McMillan relies way too much on a simple high/low zone offensive scheme.

It’s like, well, McMillan stole some playbook from a middle school gym and plagiarized it.

by AK1984 on Apr 24, 2009 3:07 PM PDT up reply actions  

He doesn't know the first thing

yet the Blazers rank at the top of the league in offensive efficiency. I thought you were a results oriented guy.

SOME PEOPLE ARE LIKE SLINKIES. NOT REALLY GOOD FOR ANYTHING BUT THEY BRING A SMILE TO YOUR FACE WHEN PUSHED DOWN THE STAIRS.

by MrGrinch on Apr 24, 2009 3:24 PM PDT up reply actions  

I've always credited Nate McMillan for creating an offense that the players can execute ...

in an efficient manner, but that doesn’t change how simple it is in nature. It certainly doesn’t compete with Rick Adelman’s use of a variation of the Princeton offense with the Sacramento Kings in the late-‘90s/early-’00s, Phil Jackson’s use of the triangle offense in Chicago and Los Angeles, and Jerry Sloan’s use of the UCLA high-post offense during the past 20+ years.

by AK1984 on Apr 24, 2009 5:09 PM PDT up reply actions  

We gotta get baskets inside

that will pull them in from the perimeter a little at least. I see a lot of Roy in the first tonite, breaking down whoever is gaurding him and taking right into Yao’s chest from the weakside. Then when Rudy/oden come in you will see a lot of post feeds…the key is to get that working…if greg is hitting shots then Rudy will start shooting…if that starts hitting then outlaw gets into his opportunistic shooting…that is when we hit our stride…it will take some patience to establish…

I think in game 2 in particular, nate new he had to lean on Roy to pull that out, and once the game went so far south so early on opening night Roy had to try and step in, by then it was way too late for those kind of heroics…now the rooks have got to show they have their sea legs under them…

Goodbye Deke. The NBA will miss Mt. Mutombo

Support families in crisis in Portland www.give10tell10.org

by PDXBuckeye on Apr 24, 2009 12:20 PM PDT up reply actions  

and lemarcus will

need to do what Lemarcus almost always does in a Blazers win, score when he touches it…

Goodbye Deke. The NBA will miss Mt. Mutombo

Support families in crisis in Portland www.give10tell10.org

by PDXBuckeye on Apr 24, 2009 12:22 PM PDT up reply actions  

Post feeds.

This strikes me as the other formula that we can try to attack Houston:

Brandon + LaMarcus + Greg = enough offense?

But as far as all this talk about uptempo and moving the ball around, noone is suggesting how that gets done. You say if the post feeds start working, then Rudy starts hitting threes. Does that mean Greg is going to start feeding Rudy? And then Rudy in turn is going to start feeding Outlaw? What I see is the Blazers playing a post-up style of basketball. Half court set offense. Slowed down. Isolation.

I guess my point is that this style of basketball does not make room for team offense or uptempo play. So when folks on the site suggest that the bench and other scorers need to step up, I say, step up to what?

by Blazin' on Apr 24, 2009 12:46 PM PDT up reply actions  

onesay if the post feeds start working, then Rudy starts hitting threes. Does that mean Greg is going to start feeding Rudy? by one
Brandon + LaMarcus + Greg = enough offense?

possibly but not likely IMO

You say if the post feeds start working, then Rudy starts hitting threes. Does that mean Greg is going to start feeding Rudy?

Kickouts could work, but the more likely scenario for increased scoring from Rudy would result from his guy needing to focus more on cutting off the passing lane to Greg, giving Rudy more room to work his shot up. Basically it gives Rudy 2 good options, feed the post or take an open shot. Without the interior game working then he is left with 1 bad option, aside from passing back around the perimeter, which is shoot a contested shot.

And then Rudy in turn is going to start feeding Outlaw?

maybe, but not necessarily. Once you get Rudy’s guy chasing, spacing on the floor will open up and Outlaw can work into the midrange game better, either through assists or long boards…

What I see is the Blazers playing a post-up style of basketball. Half court set offense. Slowed down. Isolation

I see less iso than Brandon on Tuesday though. The bench players need to get the ball in good rhythym and in good situations where they have multiple good options to be their most effective. They are not Roy or Aldridge, people that create their own shot at will as it were (mostly Brandon, although Aldridge can get that done when he is on).

I guess my point is that this style of basketball does not make room for team offense or uptempo play. So when folks on the site suggest that the bench and other scorers need to step up, I say, step up to what?

You are correct. If this happens again tonite we lose. Like I said in my original comment is that I think you will see a good dose of iso in the first, and then you will start to see these other things going happening late 1st early 2nd. If the post scoring gets rolling then the team offense will lift off for the above stated reasons. if all we do is run iso for Roy all night we will not see any of this develop…

Goodbye Deke. The NBA will miss Mt. Mutombo

Support families in crisis in Portland www.give10tell10.org

by PDXBuckeye on Apr 24, 2009 1:09 PM PDT up reply actions  

evasive! (But thanks for making the effort)

Once you get Rudy’s guy chasing…

And how does this happen? The Blazers will do an adequate job of taking advantage of the defense once the breakdown occurs. What everyone is evading is talking about how we break down the defense. Brandon can do it. In an isolation mode. But if it’s going to come through the pass, someone has got to pass the ball! And unless Sergio gets more time, or Rudy starts quarterbacking, I don’t see how that is all of a sudden going to happen.

Bottom line: Brandon or La Marcus get the ball. Everything stops. That’s not because the other guys on the team aren’t stepping up. That is because Brandon and LaMarcus literally stop. Catch their breath. Slow it down. And set up for the post/isolation move. When i see either of these guys be a conduit for the ball instead of resetting every time they touch it, I will think, “OK, that’s how we’re going to get other guys involved.”

Because Steve has been unable to get any breathing room (smart and ultimately decisive tactic by Houston) our team offense is basically shut down.

by Blazin' on Apr 24, 2009 1:28 PM PDT up reply actions  

it is not a matter of rudy not getting touches

what happened tuesday is an anomoly of sorts. It was obvious the intent was for either Brandon or LeMarcus to shoot. Nate was not interested in ball movement, he wanted the offense to flow through them, that is why everytime they touched the ball they did what you described above, that was teh gameplan.

You get Rudy’s guy chasing by forcing him to defenc the passing lane, meaning he has to step back a pace or to on rudy, instead of rubbing his chest up against rudy every second of the possession…the defender will then have a choice, the passing lane or the shot, shich to cover, Rudy can exploit that.

They have done this sort of thing most of the season, I do not see why they would have much trouble going back to it tonight.

Goodbye Deke. The NBA will miss Mt. Mutombo

Support families in crisis in Portland www.give10tell10.org

by PDXBuckeye on Apr 24, 2009 1:51 PM PDT up reply actions  

I have not seen it against Houston...

and fluid ball movement has not come easily to this team. We don’t pass crisply. and we really tend to slow things down.

Rudy has proven to be effective in 2 ways this year:

1. Receiving the ball with defense collapsed and hitting the three.
2. Receiving the ball with defense collapsed and making great pass/attacking and dishing.

Both of these things involve the defense being collapsed or rotated. Out of a static situation, Rudy has not been very effective.

I think the key here is Houston’s ability to pressure Steve Blake. If Steve can create some opening to pass cross-court and rotate the defense, everything can flow from there. Brandon is the other person that will have that opportunity to get the defense rotating, but I’ve not seen him do that.

This is why I think looking to make a pass to the wing, out of the pick and pop might be our best chance at involving our small forwards/ Rudy. Either that, or a pass from the post (LMA). Our limitation is that Brandon and LaMarcus do not make the quick pass.

Let’s check back in on this after the game. It will be interesting to see what opportunities arise when Houston really focuses on Brandon. And to see if we have any plan to take advantage of these opportunities…

by Blazin' on Apr 24, 2009 2:36 PM PDT up reply actions  

The collapsing bit is basicallly what I am saying

the reason why they have not been effective against houston is because they have not effectively scored from the post. Aldridge backs it down from very far out for almost all of his post points against houston, that is the slow thing you are commenting on. Rudy has the best entry pass to oden on the team as of late, that is why I think the key to getting the D to collapse is for Rudy to get the ball down to oden. Oden has to convert to get the collapse going…the things will start opening up for others shooting wise, including rudy…

If this works we will see a lot of the Roy Rudy Outlaw Aldridge Oden line-up tonight…

Goodbye Deke. The NBA will miss Mt. Mutombo

Support families in crisis in Portland www.give10tell10.org

by PDXBuckeye on Apr 24, 2009 3:14 PM PDT up reply actions  

Good insight, thx

It’s a bit of the Chicken and Egg, isn’t it?

Need low post scoring to create opportunities to pass; Need good passing to create opportunities (Besides Brandon) to score in the low post. Rudy has eyes like a predator. He is geared towards movement. That’s why Portland’s static offense does not really play to his strengths. If he receives the second pass in some attack, he is great at finding the seam. That has been my point here. He is at his best when someone else makes the defense commit somewhere. And yea, that could be Greg Oden. I wish our one-on-one guys would learn to do that. Pass in rhythm.

Feeding Greg would be an effective way to make them drop off of the shooters. And I agree that Greg is capable of making the pass back out to a shooter. He, like Rudy, is capable of the quick pass. And he has shown he can score against them.

Sergio is the other guy who has been good at feeding Greg. Don’t know that we’ll see much of him, though, Nate does not seem comfortable with it.

I suspect that Houston is concerned about Oden. If he’s in the game, look for them to take it right to him on the offensive end to get those quick fouls.

by Blazin' on Apr 24, 2009 4:17 PM PDT up reply actions  

LMA was back with the team for the shootaround and is ready to go tonight according to Casey

No news on what “family matter” he had to attend to.

That stop and go by Roy is straight sick. I'm calling him "The Flu" from now on. - Wendell Maxey

by Norsktroll on Apr 24, 2009 12:04 PM PDT reply actions  

Dude's from TX

Probably had to go home for some reason..

Proud member of Duck nation!

by skywaker9 on Apr 24, 2009 12:26 PM PDT up reply actions  

he probably got some BBQ.

Tonight felt like the day you open the mail and receive an acceptance letter to your dream school: the University of Playoffs. - Ben Golliver, Apr 15 2009

by 22baylor on Apr 24, 2009 12:31 PM PDT up reply actions  

True enough

No BBQ like that in Texas, that’s for sure….

Proud member of Duck nation!

by skywaker9 on Apr 24, 2009 12:36 PM PDT up reply actions  

He probably was close and just wanted to say hi

"The brownies,'' Fernandez said after the game. "The brownies are good for me to make three-points.''

by Sabonis4Ever on Apr 24, 2009 1:11 PM PDT up reply actions  

Key #1, so smple

Get Yao in foul trouble. They got jack without him with Deke out…

Proud member of Duck nation!

by skywaker9 on Apr 24, 2009 12:29 PM PDT reply actions  

Tonight's game will say more about the Rockets than the Blazers.....

….in my not as humble as it probably should be opinion.

If the Rockets win, it’s completely expected. Has anyone read or heard a SINGLE national reporter pick the Blazers to win this game tonight? The Rockets are the team coming off a loss, playing at home against a team they beat twice at home during the regular season. Not to mention that this will be the first road playoff game for the youngest NBA playoff team in a decade.

Now, what happens if the Rockets lose this game? This, above all other games, should be Houston’s to lose. If they lose this one, they lose home court AND the mystique of being dominant against the Blazers at home.

More importantly, this game says a LOT about the mental make-up of the Rockets if they can’t pull it out. They’re the veteran team here. They should be the ones taking the Blazers to school in this game. A loss here, and it’s all gone.

I’m not gonna use the M-W term here, but for the Rockets, this is about as close as it gets to that.

Yes! Yes! In the face!

by LeafHawk on Apr 24, 2009 1:06 PM PDT reply actions  

Blazers win in blowout. Game recap here

http://www.blazersedge.com/2009/4/24/851297/junk-drawer-24-4-2007-are-you#14675663

That stop and go by Roy is straight sick. I'm calling him "The Flu" from now on. - Wendell Maxey

by Norsktroll on Apr 24, 2009 2:06 PM PDT reply actions   1 recs

rec'd

both here, and there. An awesome display. I hope it all comes true as you have envisioned it! – Elgin

Tonight felt like the day you open the mail and receive an acceptance letter to your dream school: the University of Playoffs. - Ben Golliver, Apr 15 2009

by 22baylor on Apr 24, 2009 2:13 PM PDT up reply actions  

I'm not sure Houston won't keep single covering Roy and Aldridge

They’ll change things somewhat but I think they have a lot of faith in their individual defenders and the last thing they want is to get the likes of Outlaw/Rudy/Blake going for 15-20 points.

by jksnake99 on Apr 24, 2009 2:22 PM PDT reply actions  

interesting

Good call. From Houston’s perspective, the issues on Tuesday were mostly offensive. Yao.

Their defense gives us fits. Shutting down our 3-ball is pretty decisive. Bet they try to attack Oden when he is in the game though. They smell a danger there.

by Blazin' on Apr 24, 2009 2:43 PM PDT up reply actions  

Houston is better equipped to handle our offense than any team in the league, save perhaps for Cleveland or a fully healthy Boston

They have the 1v1 defenders to at least contain Roy and Aldridge (game 2 notwithstanding) while still staying with our 3 point shooters. I think they’d rather have Roy go or 30+ again that to leave a Rudy or Outlaw open to help Battier guard Brandon.

Houston no doubt feels that if they play the same way they did in game 2 except get Yao more touches, they’ll win. We need to find another scorer from that Rudy/Outlaw/Blake/Oden group, or Houston will probobly be right.

by jksnake99 on Apr 24, 2009 2:50 PM PDT up reply actions  

the matchup problems are true for us

at least as far as the starters go. However, where we’ve made our hay all season is from the bench, and I see no reason why that shouldn’t continue. It’s a bit of a mystery to me why Outlaw hasn’t been able to get off the snide at all in this series, the defenders they bring off the bench don’t match up well with him at all. He should be able to score on Landry, et al. at will.

by atomiccafe on Apr 24, 2009 2:53 PM PDT up reply actions  

Is it time to give Sergio some burn?

We haven’t seen much of our “second unit” as we are playing a more limited rotation.

by Blazin' on Apr 24, 2009 3:46 PM PDT up reply actions  

bingo

That’s the defensive 1-2 punch. 1v1 defenders and 3-point defense.

The point I’ve been trying to make on here is some alternative method of scoring is not going to appear out of a vacuum. It is our whole offensive approach that is going to limit our ability to get other guys involved outside of shooting 3’s.

Isolation. Post-up. Screens. When Nate talks about getting more ball movement, I don’t understand what he’s talking about, because there can only be one quick pass made in succession. Because as soon as the ball gets to either Brandon, LaMarcus or Travis, it stops. Rudy is the only guy who makes the quick pass, but there needs to be one more guy in order to rotate the defense.

by Blazin' on Apr 24, 2009 2:59 PM PDT up reply actions  

Our offensive approach, in general, is more than fine

We were the most efficient offense in the league. Our system works well with the players we have. It just so happens that we drew a difficult matchup in the first round. Hopefully, Nate is drawing up some new plays for Houston, but its not as if we should be changing our whole approach to tweak this particular matchup when our offense has been flat out dominant all season long.

by jksnake99 on Apr 24, 2009 3:03 PM PDT up reply actions  

Can't do it.

Can’t change your offensive approach on a dime. So the question remains, “How can we beat Houston in a series?” I can’t figure it.

A couple of things I would like us to try though:

1. Increase the pace.

2. Rotate the defense.

These are things outside of our normal offensive framework. But I think they could help.

Hopefully tonight we will begin to see some answers!

by Blazin' on Apr 24, 2009 3:13 PM PDT reply actions  

We're Quick Learners

I would imagine Nate has put it to our perimeter defenders to slow the penetration to the paint and our big men. That happens and all sorts of good things will fall the Blazers way.

by Larry The Croc on Apr 24, 2009 6:10 PM PDT reply actions  

Terrible refs

These refs are the worst I’ve seen in a long time. Joel never even touched scola and got the plus one. B-roy goes down the other way gets knocked down loses the ball and nothing! Over and over they blow calls. It’s embarassing for the NBA. I’m really starting to believe donelly when he said the whole league is rigged. It is so obvious tonight that there is a underlying thing going here with the refs. Stern needs to resign and let someone in who is concerned with the best team winning not the biggest market.

by traderlouie on Apr 24, 2009 8:00 PM PDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

The ultimate coverage and analysis of the Portland Trail Blazers.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Photo_3__small
JD 5/22
Bns_small
You're The GM. Whats your move?
Small
Hard to be a fan of a team that is so poorly managed.
Cs-sj_053_small
10 Years of 1st Round Blazer Draft Picks
Small
Draft Drawer: Pre-Lotto

Recent FanPosts

Small
Would you do this trade? Lowry, Okafor, #4?
Small
Consensus Mock Draft
Small
Keep an Eye on Great Britain
Small
two options with $20 mill cap space, the #6 pick and some luck
Batum_small
Alternate 2012 Olympics Team
Small
Collective mock draft
Small
GM Poll: K Love or L Train
Small
Off season ideas
Small
Why we should Draft Damian Lillard
Small
The Art Of Drafting

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

FanShots

Quick hits of video, photos, quotes, chats, links and lists that you find around the web.

Recommended FanShots

Assistant Michael Malone interested in the Blazers
The LeBron James Conundrum: A Legacy In Question
Shooting percentages as they apply to certain areas of the court.  Note who one of the best shooters in the NBA from the wing is.  Check out the guy dominating under the hoop as well.  Pretty impressive for a 6'9'' guy.
Fernandez: Joel Freeland Faces July 10 Deadline For Contract Buyout
Church of Basketball: An Interview With Dave

Recent FanShots

Jalen Rose on D'Antoni
Isiah Thomas hoping for return
Ferry in mix for vacant Portland GM job
Where's The GM?
Orlando Magic has decided to trade Dwight Howard
If the Sixers are eliminated by the Boston Celtics in Game 7, the general...
Interesting Quotation from Chad Ford RE: Morway and Rebuilding
Malone is a winner...
Lamarcus aldridge first nba game

+ New FanShot All FanShots >


Editors

Kitten_small Dave

Headshotsmall_small Ben Golliver

Lead Moderators

Getfuzzy-satchel_small Timmay!

Bucky3_small Cablinasian

Authors

Plainlc_small Storyteller

Moderators

Lamb_small T Darkstar

Small douglast

Terryporter_small prezofdeath

Small usmcr3049

Lrg_magpie_small Corvid

Wallpaper_small geoffm