Monday Practice Reports
Rockets Practice Report (Rose Garden)
It was a humbling experience being in the same gyms as 2 of the top 4 NBA coaches in the same morning.
Rick Adelman, chest and back hair protruding from his sweat suit, gold chain hanging, took this morning's news that Mike Brown was Coach of the Year in stride. Coach Adelman got jokes. Namely, "I always say if Jerry Sloan hasn't won it there's something wrong with that award."
Adelman went street corner wistful philosopher on the media for a moment, "I'm coaching in the highest league you can coach in. I've been doing it for 18 years. Never in my wildest dreams [did I think I would be here]... I thought I'd be at a community college or a small college my whole life." But, he was careful to note on mulitple occasions, "Attention is just not something I need [as a coach]."
Adelman briefly traced his ego-free approach to managing his teams back to his days as a player: "I never liked playing for a guy that seemed like he was in there with an ego or ripping you for no reason. You need to treat everyone differently and they will respond to you. I've seen guys lose their jobs because they were so rigid. It made no sense to me. That's not healthy."
Adelman's approach was evident in all of his players this morning. The Rockets again appeared as a loose bunch, engaging in various competitions as they waited for the media availability period to pass. Pictured below is Von Wafer nailing a lefty pull-up runner; just moments before, he threw down a lefty reverse dunk that impressed both his teammates and the assembled cameramen.
The Rockets are confident and care-free.
Their media star was Ron Artest, who recounted his first playoff experience with a wry smile on his face, "My first time in the playoffs, I didn't play great at all. I was in Indiana, I was nervous, I didn't know what I was doing. I was tired, gave in to fatigue. Just like everybody, well, not Derrick Rose, he had 36 points in his first year in the league, I don't know how he did that."
Does Portland still present a challenge to the Rockets? In Ron Ron's eyes, absolutely, "It's like poker as long as you have chips, you're still in it."
Perhaps the line of the day was Ron's quip, "As players we just want to play. We don't really care about scouting reports."
Go ahead and add that to the list of things I've not heard said by a Blazer this year.
Blazers Practice Report (Practice Facility)
Nate McMillan also took the news of his Coach of the Year success in stride but, given the stakes tomorrow night for his Blazers, he didn't allow himself the philosophical tangent that we heard from Adelman. Nate said simply, "My vote was for Mike to win it" and "as far as me being fourth, I'm alright with that." He also complimented Coach Adelman by saying, "Rick is proven. He's been a good coach for a long time and he's won everywhere he's been."
In the context of Saturday's aftermath, it's not surprising that Nate was more willing to talk about what adjustments the team would be making rather than how he fared in the Coach of the Year rankings. Nate pointed to adding "movement to the offense" as a key tomorrow night and challenged his players to bring a stronger mental toughness to the game, "One thing we've got to do is compete... We know we can play better than we played and we know we've got to play better."
Brandon expected the team to present more defensive looks for Yao Ming, stating that the team would mix things up, playing LaMarcus on him, doubling down when Greg or Joel was on him, and generally trying to keep Yao off balance. Adelman actually made the comment this morning that, "I don't know who can play [Yao] one on one consistently. He's a very, very tough cover. I think they are just trying to find out what works." Those words kept repeating in my head as Brandon and Nate described how to stop the 7'6" giant.
I'm not sure they've found out what will work yet.
Brandon also opened up today about what appeared to be bothering him on Saturday night and, to a lesser degree, at practice yesterday. He stated, "Our guys were a little nervous. A little star struck by the playoff thing... We played like a soft, young team... we didn't play aggressive. We didn't play loose. We almost played like a team that was afraid.."
It was asked, "Was there anything positive to take from yesterday?" Brandon just shook his head, "Honestly there was nothing positive. I couldn't take anything positive from that loss. We got it handed to us... There wasn't anything good about that. They kicked our butt."
As for tomorrow night, Brandon said, "It's going to be physical. It's going to be some hits. I'm just ready to go... Must win. Big game. Whatever you want to call it, it is what it is."
Perhaps the most interesting comments from Brandon today concerned his impressions of LaMarcus: "I think he played into the whole playoff thing, the whole playoff hype. He looks like he's more focused now. If I know LaMarcus, he can't wait to respond."
Brandon and LaMarcus seemed like polar opposites on the court Saturday and with their reactions at practice yesterday, so it was particularly interesting to hear Brandon apparently admit that he thinks LaMarcus might have been swept up.
It feels like a strange thing for a 3rd year player to say about another 3rd year player.
Of course, Brandon isn't your run of the mill 3rd year player.
-- Ben (benjamin.golliver@gmail.com)
52 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Since Game 2 is a "must win" and the series is like poker
do the Blazers go all-in by putting Bayless on Brooks if AB gets off to a hot start and the Rockets build a double digit lead in the first half?
"i'm tired of everyone saying portland is a young, team, they don't play like a youg team, they play like vertrens"
Paraphrasing Tas Melas. Let’s hope they bounce back like grizzled old experienced men would or could.
LMA and Roy need to be the examples
(please LaMarcus step up)
"The brownies,'' Fernandez said after the game. "The brownies are good for me to make three-points.''
He's going to step all over
Scola’s pretty little face.
"Ooo la la! The Blazers are le chic, no?"
by SabonisBonus on Apr 20, 2009 9:04 PM PDT up reply actions
Does anybody here feel that
If the Blazers come out playing hard and inspired basketball. And take game 2 convincingly (not necessarily a blowout- just a solid win)
If we take game 2 without giving Houston anything to get revenge upon, i could see us taking game 3…
but lets take this one game at a time
L@kers..... here we come
Von Wafer bothers me.
And his name makes me hungry
I'm a little confused by your tactics
by oderiferous emanations 74 on Apr 20, 2009 7:13 PM PDT reply actions
about that hunger thing
its worse in houston when people have signs saying “Vonilla Wafer” with a pic of an actual vanilla wafer
Game 1 108-81 Rockets
Rockets lead series 1-0
by TexasHoosier on Apr 20, 2009 8:11 PM PDT up reply actions
Not sure what to make of Lamarcus's attitude
It worries me that he doesn’t let himself show disappointment or frustration when he’s playing like garbage. He tends to check out mentally if he’s not playing well. It’ll be interesting to see how he responds tomorrow. He’s had a tendency to let bad games turn into bad streaks in the past. Can’t let that happen now.
In retrospect, the game last night reminds me a ton of opening night. So much fanfare, so much hype, and everybody but Roy just went into shell shock.
The team responded favorably after that game, won big games against SA and (yes) Houston, and was off and running to a winning record despite one of the most brutal opening schedules ever. They never looked back.
I’m betting on and hoping for a similar reaction this time around.
Q: Is Greg favoring his knee?
Frye: He favors dunking on your head, that's what he favors.
What?
It worries me that he doesn’t let himself show disappointment or frustration when he’s playing like garbage.
Why would this bother you? To me it’s a sign of mental strength. Resiliency is what connects all the great players of any sport.
I know less than half of you half as well as I should like, and I like less than half of you half as well as you deserve.
by haildablazer on Apr 20, 2009 7:55 PM PDT up reply actions
Resiliency is different
I didn’t explain that very well.
Exhibit A is Lebron James, CP3, and Kobe. When things aren’t going their way, they look the same as when things are. Steely resolve. They stay aggressive and play with the same focus regardless of how things are going.
Exhibit B is Carmelo Anthony, Amare Stoudemire, Rudy Gay. When things aren’t going well, these guys might smile, might take a few less shots, but the reduction is aggression is palpable. Their intensity takes a step back. They lose their edge in the face of adversity. They don’t have the same edge.
Brandon Roy belongs in the first group. Sometimes the shots aren’t falling, but he’s almost always unflappable. But Lamarcus has not responded well to adversity, sometimes, in my opinion. He checks out mentally and lets it affect every aspect of his game when he’s not shooting well or scoring. He’s more likely to smile and try to laugh it off than he is to narrow his eyes and refocus.
Q: Is Greg favoring his knee?
Frye: He favors dunking on your head, that's what he favors.
They lose their edge in the face of adversity. They don’t have the same edge.
That was a reduntantly repetitive editing error.
Q: Is Greg favoring his knee?
Frye: He favors dunking on your head, that's what he favors.
lol
Hmm, I see your point now. But I still will stick by LaMarvelous on this one. I really think that he deserves the benefit of the doubt given the way that he’s played the last month or so.
I know less than half of you half as well as I should like, and I like less than half of you half as well as you deserve.
by haildablazer on Apr 20, 2009 8:14 PM PDT up reply actions
I agree with you on LMA
I think he checked out mentally once he become frustrated. He starts to be overly aggressive on offense(offensive fouls) or be completely passive(jumpshots). LMA tends to vacillate between the two types of postures. What I would like to see is increase energy on the the defensive end or the boards. He gets taken out of games quite easily by physical defense. I’ve seen it time and time again. I can’t remember many games where he struggled offensively shooting the ball, but impacted the game by rebounding or playing great defense.
In this aspect, he reminds of Cliff Robinson. Of course Uncle Cliffy was always more expressive.
I fear for the day Paul Allen is no longer the owner of the Blazers.
He needs to reproduce soon so we have an heir in succession.
maybe...
He saw that ‘annoying voice’ commentator guy on TNT & ESPN say that he thought LaMarcus would be the break out star of this year’s playoffs and he got a little nervous about performing up to such high expectations. He did look a little soft. You can do it LA!!!
So why don't we just use robots?
One of the reasons why I so desperately avoided sports when growing up was the apparent domination of all areas of athletics by knuckleheads. Maybe it was just me, or maybe the area I grew up, but it pretty much seemed that to have success and/or happiness in organized athletics, you had to subscrbe to “jockthink,” a heady cocktail of arrogance and aggressiveness that left no room for intellectual or emotional subtleties.
As time has progressed I’ve learned better. Sports are not intrinsicly anti-intellectual. Furthermore, any group of people can be made to look dangerous and ugly if they allow the knucklehead minority to speak for them. So then, “sports > jockthink”. If anything, basketball seems especially ripe for philosophical and intellectual navel-gazing. Henry Abbott, Kevin Pelton, Bethlehem Shoals, and our own Dave Deckard have dropped some serious science on me since I picked up the Blazers bug, and I have yet to watch a basketball game where I felt like I really understood everything I just saw.
Despite all of this it seems time and again that we expect our players to be something other than human. Jarret Jack wasn’t just ridiculed for making mistakes, he was ridiculed for allowing his feelings about his mistakes to be so openly visible on the floor. Jason Quick almost lost me as a reader with the way he repeatedly criticized Greg for basically just being a sensetive kid who was dealing with enourmous pressure. When that SI article on LaMarcus came out in midseason, there were noises about whether or not he was mentally “stable.”
I think folks need to start wrapping their heads around the idea that if you have team full of “character guys,” people who are the exact opposite of knuckleheads, that you are going to end up with a group of players who are emotionally complex and who are occasionally too smart for their own good. LaMarcus’s introversion masks a strong set of beliefs and opinions. Sergio tries hard to not let his insecurities show. Greg Oden’s fallback occupation? Dentistry! Channing is a geek, Ike was also a geek, and judging from the last “behind the locker room door” installment, Nicolas is rocking the slide rule too.
Can you possibly imagine Z-Bo talking about “overthinking” himself into trouble? In hindsight, I am not at all surprised that our boys had a meltdown in Game 1. I’m not convinced that we’ll make it out of round 1, but I have no doubt that they will come out firing on all cylinders tomorrow night, and that win or lose they are going to internalize the lessons of this playoff run better than we have any right to ask of them.
by conspirator5 on Apr 20, 2009 8:35 PM PDT reply actions 10 recs
Major Big Time Rec!
Thanks for stating it so eloquently!
It's one thing to be a smart, apt player who utilizes his strengths and minimalizes his weaknesses ...
like Shane Battier, but it’s an entirely different matter when your personality traits hinder your ability on the court like LaMarcus Aldridge. One man, Battier, brings it no matter the occasion — even if he’s reportedly sick with the flu — while the other guy, Aldridge, checks out when the going gets tough for him. As a dude who’s oftentimes taken the easy road in life and is critical of others, I know those aren’t good qualities for an athlete to possess for a variety of reasons. As a result, my belief is that Aldridge’s development will be stunted in the long run by his mental frailties.
You may be completely right about that.
Unlike wingspan, vertical leap, or shooting form, somebody’s mental capacities are much harder to measure. We know for a fact that KP and the scouting team are serious about taking psychological factors into account when evaluating talent, but it’s immensely difficult to get inside somebody else’s head. Esepcially when somebody plays it really close to the vest like LaMarcus.
OTOH, the current culture of the Trailblazers provides one of the best, if not THE best environment for the mental and emotional maturation of a young male millionaire. He is developing in a team-oriented, drama-free environment with a supportive fan base. If there is any downside to being on the PTB, it’s that B-Roy is such an “old soul” that our other young guys (Greg and LA in particular) suffer in the comparison.
by conspirator5 on Apr 20, 2009 10:03 PM PDT up reply actions
LMA is a pretty complex personality
The ESPN piece (well, based on Quick articles) by Bucher detailed that well (e.g. takes it not lightly if people violate his trust). Reportedly the Chicago Bulls also had concerns after he came across very quiet and almost timid over lunch or dinner with Paxson and at that time coach Skiles. That he doesn’t also brood too much over bad games rather helps than hinders him imho.
There are times I think I'd like to see you locked in a room with LaMarcus ...
… telling him how, soft, stunted, and mentally frail he is.
hakkaa päälle !
What weight class is 6'11 240 pounds in boxing? Mega monster heavyweight?
I think only Nikolai Valuev is anywhere in that range at the moment. Even the Klitschkos are small compared to that.
I bet you can't wait.
Oh god, making that joke felt good.
Sorry, TIH
I know less than half of you half as well as I should like, and I like less than half of you half as well as you deserve.
by haildablazer on Apr 20, 2009 10:14 PM PDT up reply actions
Eloquent, thought provoking post
Reminds me a little bit of a David Sadaris essay.
But, to the extent you’re suggesting that high character and emotional complexity (on the basketball court) go hand in hand, I have to reject the premise. Emotional complexity (especially when synonymous with frailty) may make someone a more relatable, interesting person, but it doesn’t necessarily equate to high character (and vice versa), and it doesn’t equate to good basketball when it manifests itself on the court.
I’ll separate this into two ideas. First, emotional complexity on the basketball court does not necessarily indicate high character. I would suggest that Lamarcus’s reaction to on court adversity is more in tune with “knucklehead” sports culture than it is with character/intellectualism. Without delving too deeply into armchair physchology, a lot of guys check out mentally when they’re not playing well. This is a defense mechanism. If I’m not playing all that hard, or focused, nobody will blame me or think less of me because I’m not playing well.
Second, I think the flipside is also true – high character does not necessarily lead to emotional complexity on the basketball court. There are countless examples of “good guys” who may have tremendous emotional complexity off the court, but who don’t let their emotions negatively affect their play. Mr. Duncan is perhaps the most obvious example, and many people (myself included) have in fact compared him to a robot, and not in a complimentary way. You can flip on the tv and catch any particular play, and you’re not going to know whether Duncan’s having a good game or a bad game. He brings the same focus, determination, and attitude no matter what.
Is the same true of Lamarcus? I would say, sometimes, no. You could turn on the tv in the third quarter of a lot of games earlier this season, when he was struggling, and know immediately based on his demeanor and effort that he was having a subpar game. That was the case last night, as well.
That doesn’t make him a bad person, it doesn’t mean we shouldn’t root for him, and it may even make him more interesting and relatable. (In fact, many of us would likely react the same way to the kind of pressure these guys are under.) But it does possibly limit his reliability as an elite basketball player.
Q: Is Greg favoring his knee?
Frye: He favors dunking on your head, that's what he favors.
by KP Corleone on Apr 21, 2009 6:49 AM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
KP+C, a day late, you'll probably never see this...
But that was good stuff. I think you are right about me overstating the relationship between character and emotional complexity, and I got away from my underlying idea…. which is… um… :-)
Which is that I think we need to expect that based on the type of players we are trying to recruit and retrain that they will need more time to develop mentally and emotionally than your average athlete.
That’s a hell of a run-on sentence, but I think that’s the nutshell version of my first post. :-)
by conspirator5 on Apr 21, 2009 6:39 PM PDT up reply actions
put nic on brooks
i would rather have ron ron jacking up shots then brooks blowing by our guards, im not sure how much quicker blakey is then nic but i think nics overall length and defensive skill can more then make up for it
"Howard, he know me" Rudy
Who would Blake guard?
He can’t guard Artest, that will be Bryon Russell in the post vs. James “Hollywood” Robinson all over again.
1, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13, 21... I know...
by FibonacciSequence on Apr 20, 2009 11:21 PM PDT up reply actions
ya it would be
much easier for him to guard battier(sense he is mostly a spot up shooter) i know it sounds bad but who would you rather take your chances with, battier burning us or brooks burning us?
"Howard, he know me" Rudy
by phillyduck23 on Apr 20, 2009 11:29 PM PDT up reply actions
Good point
I guess Battier is not that quick… I’d probably take my chances with him shooting jumpers with Blake getting a hand in his face and let Batum deal with Brooks’ speed.
You think Battier wouldn’t take Blake down low anyway? He’s still got a good 5 inches on him or so…
1, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13, 21... I know...
by FibonacciSequence on Apr 20, 2009 11:32 PM PDT up reply actions
i'm not sure
i haven’t watched him play enough to see if he has any sort of post up game but again if battier is posting up that means yao isn’t and that seems like a better option to me even if he does bully blake over, i think blake can pester him enough to cause him trouble and they would have to clear the whole post out leaving yao most likely at the top of the key making him useless for offensive rebounds(because any of our centers could out quick him to the rebound) or someone could help blake down low leaving, i think, either scola or yao for a mid range jumper which again is better then them posting up.
"Howard, he know me" Rudy
by phillyduck23 on Apr 20, 2009 11:47 PM PDT up reply actions
Not only would Shane Battier avoid posting up on Steve Blake down low, he probably ...
would be averse to cutting down the baseline for the most part. As magnificant as Battier is defensively, he’s almost strictly a spot-up shooter from the outside. Furthermore, only 21% of Battier’s field-goal attempts are close-range shots — with 56% of those being assisted by someone else — thus, there’s no need to worry about him overly abusing Steve Blake.
ya turn the no stats all star
into someone they need to fill up the stat sheet
"Howard, he know me" Rudy
by phillyduck23 on Apr 20, 2009 11:56 PM PDT up reply actions
Shane Battier has got flaws, with some of those being his lack of handles and ...
inability to create for himself. Thus, so long as Steve Blake can stick on Battier and put a hand up when he shoots a spot-up jumper, containment should definitely be in the cards. Yep, you and I seem to be on the same page here.
I wish that Ime Udoka was still on the Trail Blazers; he'd handle the Ron Artest assignment.
Heck, if Kevin Pritchard could somehow move both Travis Outlaw and Martell Webster — such as a deal wherein both of them and Sergio Rodriguez were traded to the Minnesota T’wolves for Mike Miller — then I’d advocate offering a one-year, minimum-level contract worth $959,111 to Portland State alum Udoka.
http://www.insidehoops.com/minimum-nba-salary.shtml
http://games.espn.go.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=d3amb2
A small forward trio of Nicolas Batum, Miller, and Udoka would certainly bring a variety of skills to the table.
oh please. miller again. you're stuck on him.
pick somebody else. hedo turkoglu (another ugly). it’s not remotely controversial to say that miller underperformed this year in minnesota. he was on the cnn/si anti-all star team, and later steve aschenbrenner (who closely follows that team) wrote a piece about how miller wouldn’t shoot when open anymore.
otherwise, although you’re overopinionated, you usually make some kind of sense. but you have this idee fixe.
ignacio
I abhor Dave Berri, but you've forced me to do this.
http://www.wagesofwins.com/TWolves510809.html
Mike Miller wasn’t the issue in Minnesota, pure and simple.
I would rather see AB jacking up dumb shots than Ron jacking up better shots
Everyone talks about how “lucky” Yao was. I did not think that Yao was lucky at all when compared to Brooks. He was hitting some Outlaw style shots.
Is there a way to do that
without giving up Martell? I’d really like to see him have a shot with this group. He hasn’t played with Oden, Rudy, or Bayless yet. Could be an interesting combination.
Also, didn’t Udoka leave because he got offered more money from SA or was it that Portland flat out didn’t want to resign him? In the case of the former, I’m guessing if he left for the money, he wouldn’t want to play for the minimum. If the latter, maybe the hometown/championship-caliber team factor would be enough. But I can’t imagine why Portland wouldn’t have wanted a strong defender on the team for cheap, even if he’s only used as a more situational player.
1, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13, 21... I know...
by FibonacciSequence on Apr 21, 2009 12:24 AM PDT reply actions
errr, that should've been a reply to AK
Rookie mistake :(
1, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13, 21... I know...
by FibonacciSequence on Apr 21, 2009 12:25 AM PDT up reply actions
Ime Udoka received a two-year, $2,080,000 contract from the San Antonio Spurs, which is a flat-out ...
pittance for a NBA player—even for a defensive stopper off of the bench such as himself. I, therefore, think that it’s possible that the Trail Blazers may sign Udoka, who’ll turn 32 this August, to a cost-efficient deal.
Now, with regards to Martell Webster, I still have major concerns with his lack of versatility on offense — as he’s unable to create his own shot or distribute the ball for teammates — while he’s also lacking the necessary lateral quickness to be a true stopper defensively. Although many people turn to that amazing 24 point quarter Webster had many moons ago — which is selective analysis at its worst — I just don’t see that much long-term potential in him.
Spurs fans seem to hate Ime
he hasn’t played all that well this year. I haven’t tracked him lately to see if that’s changed later in the season.
I think the difference between LA ans B Roy shows how importnat college is.
Sure B Roy spent his first couple years of school learning and his next couple years learning how to lead a team. LA had a decent year in college but he never learned what it means to be a leader. For the guys that come out one-and-done they don’t start becoming leaders until they are older where as a guy like B Roy comes in and starts leading in a year or two. Just my opinion though.

by 


































