The refereeing in game 1.
Sorry if everyone is sick of this subject, but I think the refereeing may be the single most important indicator of how we do in the next few games. The calls in game 1 made me sick. I was shocked. I maybe have never seen a game called so one-sided before. I was at the RG, just as pumped as everyone else, and the referees pissed in my cheerios right along with Yao and Brooks. I got mad, disgusted, depressed, and even jaded with the NBA while watching the game....but after I came home, had time to reflect on how the game was called, and had multiple discussions with everyone at my work about it today, I realized that the game was probably called a lot more fairly than most of us would care to admit. I know, blasphemy, but hear me out.
The Rockets came into the RG ready to play like men. They have been here before. They know how the calls are going to go in the playoffs. They were bruising, banging, cutting, screening, communicating, rotating, boxing out, swishing, rolling, and dominating. They looked so much tighter and more polished than us it was shocking. And it wasn't just the shots going in. It was the defensive rotation, the solid screens, the complete control they had of the paint. They were the aggressors in a big way, and the aggressors usually get the calls to go their way.
The Blazers however, looked like the London sillynannies ( Family Guy reference to all you Peter Griffin fans ). They were reacting most of the game. They were a step slow, an inch short, and a hairs breath away from looking like a joke. They weren't rotating well, resorting to one-on-one plays, not moving the ball, providing incomplete screens, and letting the Rockets dictate everything they do on both ends.
The calls went the way of the aggressors in the first quarter. The refs were calling in favor of the Rockets because they were playing REAL playoff basketball. To the Blazers credit, they tried a few times to match the physical intensity of Houston, but the tone was already set. Also, when the Blazers tried to man up, they did it the wrong way, with LMA lowering his shoulder on more than one occasion right into the defender and getting the O foul, or Roy driving right into the middle of a pack of Houston defenders. The Refs never gave Portland a chance to get back into the game with the lopsided calls, and Portland probably didn't deserve to get back into it. They made their runs, sure, and at times looked like they just might pull out of it, but then Houston answered with authority, as is easy to do when you're up 20 points, and the Blazers reverted back to their JV ways ( for that game at least ).
I bring this up because I think the fouls will determine who wins the next game, not because of the obvious points earned, and minutes it may affect for each teams key players, but because this Houston team is so much about their physical play, that the number of free throws attempted will tell us if we are able to keep pace or not. I would bet money that the team that attempts more free throws in game 2 will be the victor. Sorry for such a long post. We can still win this series. If any team can step up to the challenge, it's us. GO BLAZERS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
23 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I never post stuff like this....but....

"The Rockets broke the heart-shaped lock on our diary and read it. They know our shirt sizes AND our shoe sizes. They know our ballboy’s girlfriend’s nickname. They own us." - nightbluefruit
by Sabonis4Ever on Apr 19, 2009 9:46 PM PDT reply actions 2 recs
Officiating seemed fine to me
Houston came to play and the Blazers didn’t. We lost the game by 30 for goodness sakes.
This is the playoffs folks. The play is supposed to be more physical and the refs
let you play more. That is why Oden can be more of a factor.
I'm a little confused by your tactics
by oderiferous emanations 74 on Apr 19, 2009 10:22 PM PDT up reply actions
Our guys weren't allowed to be that physical though...
I blame the loss on the team and coaching, but the refs did not do a good job in this game. I watch instant replays after every questionable call either way, and they were definitely allowed to be a lot more “playoff physical” than we were.
Like I said though, the blowout loss was on the guys, not the refs.
Exactly
The Blazers lost this game, but the refs didn’t do them any favors. They set the tone, allowing the rockets to as physical as they like off the ball, but we weren’t allowed that same leeway and were hit with some quick fouls, causing the Blazers to stop being physical. The rest we know, it turned out ugly.
The free throw discrepancy proves this point. There were quite a few times, in the 1st qtr, where somebody drove the lane, got fouled and there was no call. At first, it wasn’t all jumpers, so that doesn’t explain it (until the tone was set).
BUT, I’m not blaming the refs, they didn’t beat us by 27. The Blazers crawled into their shells and shied from the contact. They stopped cutting, setting screens and moving the ball because it was too much work, so they stood around watching BRoy or Aldridge.
Witty Unpredictable Talent and Natural Game
No it didn't
It was terrible. Luckily, they shot 58.5% and we shot 41.7%, so the refs didn’t matter enough to cost us the loss.
However, if both teams had shot closer to 50%, the game would have still been tough to win.
I dont know but everything the Blazers did looked hurried.
It looked like they jacked up shoots with 15 still on the shot clock, that really worked in the Rockets favor. But on the other had Blazers had more points in the paint than the Rockets. So going inside is not bad, maybe just an extra pass would be better. Roy had to do it cuz everybody wanted to pass the ball to him and watch. LMA, Outlaw, Rudy, Blake should try to hit those open shots and it will free up the middle for Roy, Oden,and LMA.
And Oden, once again, is a rookie, so non-stop fast break basketball is like fast-forwarding a song while he's trying to learn the lyrics.
This is my biggest
problem with the disparity in free throws in this game. Portland loses by 30 yet somehow manages to score more in the paint and get absolutely annihilated at the free throw line?
That’s some tricksy math.
Just felt like every time Portland tried to assert themselves, there was an offensive foul or non-call waiting for them.
Everybody was a baby once, Arthur. Oh, sure, maybe not today, or even yesterday. But once. Babies, chum: tiny, dimpled, fleshy mirrors of our us-ness, that we parents hurl into the future, like leathery footballs of hope. And you've got to get a good spiral on that baby, or evil will make an interception.
Still,
Portland got rolled, which means every time they didn’t get a call they let it get them down, but it doesn’t make me feel any better.
Everybody was a baby once, Arthur. Oh, sure, maybe not today, or even yesterday. But once. Babies, chum: tiny, dimpled, fleshy mirrors of our us-ness, that we parents hurl into the future, like leathery footballs of hope. And you've got to get a good spiral on that baby, or evil will make an interception.
Houston's defensive philosophy centers very much around avoiding fouling.
Ours doesn’t. Don’t get hung up on free throw disparity.
by howlingfantods on Apr 20, 2009 8:49 AM PDT up reply actions
This is an argument that I've seen here over and over
But the fact is that Yao Ming did not even attempt a shot in the second half. You really think that if the score was closer that Yao wouldn’t even ATTEMPT a shot in the second half? If he had, the point differential in the paint would have been closer, if not in the Rockets favor.
Who usually gets to the line?
The team that goes inside. Blazers had more points inside than Rockets, but some how never got the same calls the Rockets did. So the Rockets got free throws mostly on shooting jumpers.
And Oden, once again, is a rookie, so non-stop fast break basketball is like fast-forwarding a song while he's trying to learn the lyrics.
it's called
playoff basketball people,i know it’s been awhile since most of you have seen it live.but that’s just the way the games are called during the playoffs.live with it.just man*up blazers and everything else will come through.just man*up.
Bad officiating and Poor Blazer Effort
These things are not mutually exclusive. They both happened. The best thing about it is that the players have not mentioned one word about the officiating. They seem to have taken responsibility and are moving on to Game 2.
I agree with everyone who is saying that the Blazers got their tails kicked and they didn’t respond well to getting punched in the mouth and they allowed the non-calls to force them onto the outside and they turned into a one-on-one team…etc. But, I was at the game. I watched it. The officiating was one sided. It wasn’t the factor that won the game for Houston. They kicked our butts. They showed us they were the boss, for now. They earned the win. It was not given to them by the officials. But the game was still not officiated evenly.
PTB Liberation Day - 2/10/04
Exactly, just because we played bad and Houston played great it doesn't mean the refs called the game well
There won't be clean officiating in the NBA until David Stern is forcibly removed by the US Congress in 2013 for fixing games.
by 123_G.O._RipCity on Apr 20, 2009 8:55 AM PDT up reply actions
If anything, the refs calls were Portland's fault.
Sure, there were a couple of instances in the first half where it seemed like Portland got called for fouls for things that the Rockets got away with on the other end, but it’s not like that’s what happened with every call. There were just a couple instances of this in the first half.
And then what does Portland do? They shy away from the physical contact even more, ensuring that they wouldn’t get back into the game! That’s the biggest problem of all from Saturday night’s game. Does anyone on here REALLY think that the refs were going to continue that pattern for the entire game as though they had some agenda to rob Portland of this game? Seriously, do we have any Mel Gibson-level nuts around here who think that?
Bottom line, if the other team is being physical, don’t let the refs stop you from responding in kind. I guarantee you that if both teams continued to play physical to the end, the refs would have called the game the same for both sides.
Portland just never let that scenario come to pass. That can’t be the case for game 2 or this series is over.
Yes! Yes! In the face!
Well, we're on the same page
But saying that it was Portlands fault seems wrong. Losing was Portlands fault for sure, but the refs set the tone of the game and let it be known that Houston could be physical, while Portland couldn’t. That had HUGE implications and is what caused the sort of, deer in the headlights, look, instead of our players getting physical right back. The refs simply didn’t allow us to play the same game, in the first quarter. After that, it was over.
Witty Unpredictable Talent and Natural Game





















