Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: The Worst Team Ever Projected?

Playoff Game 1 Recap: Rockets 108, Blazers (Don't Ask)

Boxscore

Feeling a little panic?

Well, you can stop now.  It's not time yet.  Wait until Tuesday's game.  We said at the beginning of all of this that whatever happened tonight wouldn't decide the series.  That means whatever...even a deflating blowout.  Read a few posts below and you'll see it in black and white.  Just as important as what happened tonight is the Blazers' reaction to what happened tonight.  That's what will determine how this series goes.  I can see the Blazers winning one game in Houston.  I don't believe the Blazers can win two there.  Right now the vision becomes very short term.  Win Game 2.  That's all there is to it.

The truth is, a blowout was always a possibility.  That's part of never having been there before.  The Rockets have been to the dance six years straight and never so much as got off the wall, let alone getting to put their moves on.  They know the deal.  They weren't going to hold back.  This was like the Blazers showing up for a boxing match, walking in the gym, setting down their bag, and saying, "Hey, where do I change into my BAM!!!"

"What the heck?  I just walked in the...BAM!!!"

"But I'm not even...BAM!!!"

"Hey ref, are you gonna...BAM!!!" 

"Oh, so it's that kind of fight."

Yeah, it's that kind of fight.  Unfortunately by the time the Blazers figured that out they were down 15 with shaken confidence.  Trying to come back against the Rockets is a difficult task at any point, but with everything rolling right for them and the Blazers, through shock or discouragement, abandoning nearly everything that got them here a comeback just wasn't going to happen.

The game got physical right out of the gate.  Portland was banging guys around as they cut or set screens, which was good.  The problem was the Rockets' style of physical was leading to points.  The Blazers' style was leading to fouls.  Houston force-fed Yao Ming right at the start, throwing their haymaker immediately.  Yao connected again and again.  That in itself wasn't the game-decider.  I actually thought the Blazers did the right thing by not sending the farm after him when he started hitting.  He was eventually going to miss or tire and then it would have been Portland's turn.

The real problem for Portland came around the periphery of Yao's great night.  For example...

--Once Yao started scoring it put pressure on Portland to answer.  When under pressure the Blazers tend to revert to one-on-one play, which they did tonight.  Most of the night Portland played 1- or 2-man offense instead of 4- or 5- man offense.  This played right into the Rockets' hands. 

--Once Houston started rolling Yao and his teammates got some courtesy calls from the refs which weren't being reciprocated the other way.  The problem was most evident in the first quarter but the Blazers ended up making it a game-long affair.  When the whistles appeared to blow unevenly Portland stopped being aggressive inside.  Having missed out on a couple foul shot opportunities they shrugged their shoulders and shot outside instead.  When they did drive they pulled up short of the rim instead of taking it all the way and forcing the refs to make decisions.  If you drive and then fade the refs are going to assume you stopped you instead of the opponent stopping you.  If you want calls, especially in the playoffs, especially when things are going against you already, you have to get some Iverson-esque pinball action going in there.  The Blazers just didn't.

Granted the puzzling foul criteria contributed to the Blazers' game being off.  But this is the playoffs.  Portland can't let that happen.  When you let somebody--ANYBODY--take your aggression and passion away from you then you're not going to make it.  You have to fight for that stuff.  You have to look everybody in the eye and say, "This is MY house, this is MY ball, and these are MY moves in MY space.  Now put me on the damn line."  If the other team starts dominating you then nobody is going to have any sympathy when the whistles go against you too.

On the other end, when the Blazers got into the penalty early in both of the first two quarters it became like a slow points leak that they could never compensate for.

--The Blazers were having trouble controlling rebounds.  They faced a shortage of offensive rebounds early.  Houston shot the lights out at the beginning of the game so even the one or two offensive rebounds the Rockets did put back really hurt.  Without control of the glass the Blazers were never able to push, nor to force the Rockets out of their comfort zone.

--Brandon Roy's supporting cast came up blank.  The Rockets smothered LaMarcus Aldridge.  Steve Blake missed jumpers he usually hits.  Eliminate those two and who else produces points in the starting lineup?  Everybody but Brandon looked nervous.  There was precious little help from the second unit, whose offensive confusion was palpable.  They literally looked like they had not played together before on certain trips down the court.  Spacing was non-existent.  Passing was spotty. Picks were lame.  Shots were long and contested.  Don't even talk about the three-pointers.  The hoop could have been twice as wide and they still would have clanged.  Nothing came easy, or even normal, except when Brandon had the ball.

--This was just one of those nights when everything the opponent tossed up, they hit.  Portland's defense really wasn't that atrocious or vulnerable to anybody besides Yao.  Brooks just went off.  Scola and Artest looked completely comfortable and hit the majority of their shots as well.  That's not Houston.  It's like the bad parts of the Houston offense were distilled out for a night.  They're going to be back as long as the Blazers keep showing commitment to defense.

Yao alone didn't, and won't, kill us.  But all of these things together?  Every Fourth of July when you're out in the park watching the show somebody tells the story of the year when the goofball pushed the wrong button or lit the wrong fuse and the whole display went off at once.  That's pretty much what happened tonight.

One of the things that did go right was the pick and roll against Yao.  That's going to be a staple of the Portland attack because it tires him, gets him away from the bucket, threatens to draw fouls on him, and in the absence of any of these things still provides good looks at the hoop.

It's doubtful that the experiment is repeatable, especially with the Blazers forewarned.  I fully expect Portland to come out angry on Tuesday.  I do expect the Blazers will get the win.  The problem is that every game to Houston is lose-able and the margin has just narrowed.  The pressure will be off a little with a victory in three days but the line Portland is walking until then is razor-thin.

The stats from this game are, of course, sick.  And not in a good way.  It was just a weird outing.  For instance the Blazers got up 19 more shots than the Rockets, which normally you'd think would spell a win.  But with Houston shooting 58.5% while Portland fired at 41.7%, the Rockets actually hit three more field goals.  The Blazers shot 1-11 from distance.  The Rockets held a 24-10 advantage in free throws made.  The Blazers had 15 offensive rebounds, which is an enormous number, especially when compared to Houston's 8.  Despite that Portland lost the overall rebounding battle...by 14.  Portland had only 12 assists.   Those last two stats show more than anything that Portland was not going to win this game no matter how many shots we made.  This may have been the best of Rockets ball but it just was not Blazer basketball at all.

Individual Notes 

--Brandon Roy did his best to carry the team offensively.  He was the only guy who had any success penetrating, invariably off of Joel's screens.  He shot 10-23 for 21 points.  He only had 2 assists and 2 rebounds though.  That isn't a complete Brandon night.

--Greg Oden had success going up against Dikembe Mutumbo, though he was protected from major minutes against Yao.  He was the only guy besides Brandon who looked like he knew what big game business was about.  6-7, 5 rebounds, 15 points in 22 minutes.  It isn't the worst strategy in the world to bring in Greg every time Yao sits.  Be it foul trouble or rest Yao will need bench time during this series.  Greg could make the Rockets fear those moments.

--Rudy Fernandez didn't get many touches or shots (1-3 on the night).  A stagnant offense doesn't play to his strengths.  But he was still energetic, confident, and moving around out there.  Kudos to him.

--The ESPN commentators commented on Steve Blake's defense, or lack thereof.  I'll say it again...Aaron Brooks is not going to win this series for the Rockets.  In fact I'd rather have him try than Yao.  We do, however, need Steve to sink his threes.  2-6 shooting, 1-4 from distance, 5 points, 6 assists, 5 rebounds.

--Joel was cleaning up scraps inside offensively and had 8 points and 5 rebounds in 17 minutes.  He had 17 minutes because of his 4 fouls.

--Travis Outlaw's 4-10 and 9 points in 26 minutes doesn't bother me.  2 total rebounds does.  No matter who he's defending or where he is when the ball goes up we need him fighting for rebounds.

--LaMarcus Aldridge couldn't get it going.  Luis Scola could.  The less said about this the better.  Unless it reverses we'll have a hard time winning a game.

--Nobody else could make enough of a difference to matter.

Final Thoughts

The worst part about the spread schedule in the first round is that we'll have to live with this game for the next three days.  The Blazers will too.  Hopefully the bad taste will make a difference.

Out of courtesy and affection I'm going to mention TheDreamShake but I don't imagine you'll want to read anything over there until after Game 2.

You can find the Gameday Threads in all of their gruesomeness here.

Jersey Contest Playoff results for this game:

  • FromAfar  30
  • Sir-1  25
  • Tweener  25
  • MavetheGreat  12
  • Blazersand2000--Eliminated via sudden death tiebreaker

--Dave (blazersub@yahoo.com)

Comment 136 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Virgins no longer

Time to respond.

"The Rockets broke the heart-shaped lock on our diary and read it. They know our shirt sizes AND our shoe sizes. They know our ballboy’s girlfriend’s nickname. They own us." - nightbluefruit

by Sabonis4Ever on Apr 19, 2009 12:05 AM PDT reply actions  

We need to put the white shoes back on...

Nice writing Sabonis4Ever—I couldn’t agree more. Did we ‘study’ for this game?

…and no more Chalupas if we score 100+ but loose, though I don’t think it will be a problem in this series.

No More Chalupas

by No More Chalupas on Apr 20, 2009 3:02 PM PDT up reply actions  

Just got back from the game

No negative comments tonight. Really disappointing though.

Never seen fans as angry as those flowing out of the stadium doors after the game.

Did the entire nation hear the “these refs suck”" chants? Somewhat bush-league, sure, but I imagine Stern couldn’t be thrilled at it.

by Timmay! on Apr 19, 2009 12:09 AM PDT reply actions  

Loud and clear

"The Rockets broke the heart-shaped lock on our diary and read it. They know our shirt sizes AND our shoe sizes. They know our ballboy’s girlfriend’s nickname. They own us." - nightbluefruit

by Sabonis4Ever on Apr 19, 2009 12:10 AM PDT up reply actions  

so THAT's what they were chanting... I couldn't tell on TV

Wow, that’s incredibly bush league. We’re better than that, Portland.

by jksnake99 on Apr 19, 2009 12:11 AM PDT up reply actions  

It was a really loud chant inside the arena

Worth noting that the fans were even more unhappy at Portland’s performance. They just tend not to chant it in unison. As most people were leaving, they almost wanted an apology from the team for this one.

I don’t know if it came across on TV, but there was a gigantic GROAN from the crowd every time Frye put up a shot with his feet on the 3-point line.

by Timmay! on Apr 19, 2009 12:39 AM PDT up reply actions  

We will never boo this team

We will take it out on the refs instead. I’m totally fine with the chant.

"The Rockets broke the heart-shaped lock on our diary and read it. They know our shirt sizes AND our shoe sizes. They know our ballboy’s girlfriend’s nickname. They own us." - nightbluefruit

by Sabonis4Ever on Apr 19, 2009 12:40 AM PDT up reply actions  

I like the synergy

you displayed with the boxing references in this recap and TheDreamShake’s analogy of Blazers : Houston as Glass Joe : Mike Tyson in his prime. Nicely done.

1, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13, 21... I know...

by FibonacciSequence on Apr 19, 2009 12:10 AM PDT reply actions  

So who are L@kers, Cavs and Boston in terms of boxing if Rockets are Mike Tyson in prime?

And Oden, once again, is a rookie, so non-stop fast break basketball is like fast-forwarding a song while he's trying to learn the lyrics.

by RipCity on Apr 19, 2009 12:24 AM PDT up reply actions  

We are Mike Tyson

The Rockets are our Buster Douglas.

"The Rockets broke the heart-shaped lock on our diary and read it. They know our shirt sizes AND our shoe sizes. They know our ballboy’s girlfriend’s nickname. They own us." - nightbluefruit

by Sabonis4Ever on Apr 19, 2009 12:25 AM PDT up reply actions  

I think Yao is Bruce Lee, who came in a bugger body.

And Oden, once again, is a rookie, so non-stop fast break basketball is like fast-forwarding a song while he's trying to learn the lyrics.

by RipCity on Apr 19, 2009 12:43 AM PDT up reply actions  

Wow not bugger but "bigger".

And Oden, once again, is a rookie, so non-stop fast break basketball is like fast-forwarding a song while he's trying to learn the lyrics.

by RipCity on Apr 19, 2009 12:43 AM PDT up reply actions  

For anyone who uses the "experience" excuse:

Derrick Rose
Aaron Brooks

There is no excuse for what we saw in this game. Its important to remember that its just one game, and we can’t be drawing any conclusions yet. I’m very interested in how the likes of Aldridge and Outlaw respond. Are these guys playoff softies or is this a one game fluke?

by jksnake99 on Apr 19, 2009 12:11 AM PDT reply actions  

If you're just considering one player

you might as well throw Brandon Roy on your list. He’s not that experienced.

But obviously if you’re talking combined experience and playoff experience Houston and even Chicago have more than Portland does…Houston FAR more. So the analysis probably can’t be taken too far there.

Besides, my dear sainted grandmother could probably take Boston without Kevin Garnett. And she wouldn’t need overtime to do it.

—Dave

by Dave on Apr 19, 2009 12:15 AM PDT up reply actions  

According to the recent Kevin Pelton Washington Post article, 7 of the 10 youngest playoff teams ever advanced

There is just no evidence to back up the “youth doesn’t win in the playoffs” conventional wisdom.

by jksnake99 on Apr 19, 2009 12:17 AM PDT up reply actions  

my mistake

It was in the Wall Street Journal, not the Post.

by jksnake99 on Apr 19, 2009 12:19 AM PDT up reply actions  

I could be mistaken

but I’m pretty sure it’s 7 of the 10 youngest teams to 50 wins advanced, which isn’t quite the same thing…but only tangentially saps your point.

The Michael Ruffin of BlazersEdge, cuz Amlmart said so.

by BlazersOrBust on Apr 19, 2009 12:20 AM PDT up reply actions  

I just looked it up, and you are correct

Thanks for the correction. Point remains the same. The “youth” and “experience” excuses are really grasping at straws.

by jksnake99 on Apr 19, 2009 12:21 AM PDT up reply actions  

In that

youth might very well not win in the playoffs up to and until a certain point (50 wins). But given that the Blazers have surpassed that point, your argument is still valid.

The Michael Ruffin of BlazersEdge, cuz Amlmart said so.

by BlazersOrBust on Apr 19, 2009 12:23 AM PDT up reply actions  

We are younger and less experienced than any of those 'youngest'

"The Rockets broke the heart-shaped lock on our diary and read it. They know our shirt sizes AND our shoe sizes. They know our ballboy’s girlfriend’s nickname. They own us." - nightbluefruit

by Sabonis4Ever on Apr 19, 2009 12:27 AM PDT up reply actions  

so?

If there’s no evidence that being younger and less experienced makes you less likely to win, why should it matter if we’re even younger? We won 54 games. We’re good enough to win in the playoffs… if we show up. That’s the question… do our guys bounce back or do they go quietly?

Age is a non-issue here.

by jksnake99 on Apr 19, 2009 12:29 AM PDT up reply actions  

Age and experience are a issue.

Where is your point differential now?

"The Rockets broke the heart-shaped lock on our diary and read it. They know our shirt sizes AND our shoe sizes. They know our ballboy’s girlfriend’s nickname. They own us." - nightbluefruit

by Sabonis4Ever on Apr 19, 2009 12:31 AM PDT up reply actions  

evidence of age and experience being an issue?

and aren’t you flip flopping on this?

Matchups and not experience were and are the problem imo

-Sabonis4Ever

http://www.blazersedge.com/2009/4/19/844411/that-was-depressing-but-it-was#

Point differential isn’t going to get everything right. If what we saw tonight continues, I will definitely move closer to being a “matchups” guy, but there’s no evidence that experience is relevant here.

by jksnake99 on Apr 19, 2009 12:34 AM PDT up reply actions  

You said age is a non-issue

It is obviously an issue, but not the biggest. Our player by player match ups are worse.

"The Rockets broke the heart-shaped lock on our diary and read it. They know our shirt sizes AND our shoe sizes. They know our ballboy’s girlfriend’s nickname. They own us." - nightbluefruit

by Sabonis4Ever on Apr 19, 2009 12:40 AM PDT up reply actions  

Did you watch the game?

Evidence enough.

"The Rockets broke the heart-shaped lock on our diary and read it. They know our shirt sizes AND our shoe sizes. They know our ballboy’s girlfriend’s nickname. They own us." - nightbluefruit

by Sabonis4Ever on Apr 19, 2009 12:41 AM PDT up reply actions  

Look at Rose who blasted Boston and he is young.

I just think that there are young players that have that attitude and wont get intimidated, but everybody can learn to be tough.

And Oden, once again, is a rookie, so non-stop fast break basketball is like fast-forwarding a song while he's trying to learn the lyrics.

by RipCity on Apr 19, 2009 12:47 AM PDT up reply actions  

I dont know if it was more the blazers' lack of experience

or the Rockets’ drive and motivation. From a Rockets perspective, we came out determined to do one thing and that was to win. We have lost heartbreaking series in the recent past but that was all with McGrady. This is a different team who knows that to win in the playoffs they have to play great d and feed the Great Wall. The Rockets got a huge weight lifted off their backs by not having to play the jizz, and we took it out on the blazers tonight.

Game 1 108-81 Rockets

Rockets lead series 1-0

by TexasHoosier on Apr 19, 2009 12:53 AM PDT up reply actions  

it was the Rockets coming out focused and ready

and the Blazers folding after the Rockets hit them early.

Now we will see how the Blazers respond.

Oof— does your sig really need to list the score? We are in enough pain without having to see that score again ;)

by jksnake99 on Apr 19, 2009 12:58 AM PDT up reply actions  

yes it does, sorry

but dont worry im putting up all the scores so if your blazers win a game you will get to see that

Game 1 108-81 Rockets

Rockets lead series 1-0

by TexasHoosier on Apr 19, 2009 1:00 AM PDT up reply actions  

ok fair enough

now, time to sleep and pretend the game didn’t happen.

by jksnake99 on Apr 19, 2009 1:01 AM PDT up reply actions  

I think the Rockets were knocked out of the playoffs for so many years in the row out of the 1 round

that they were determined to do whats going to work, and keep doing it until there was better option. And that of course starts with Yao. Blazers on the other hand were watching what Roy can do for them, and it usually worked. Now they know what it means “Play-offs are totally different beast”.

And Oden, once again, is a rookie, so non-stop fast break basketball is like fast-forwarding a song while he's trying to learn the lyrics.

by RipCity on Apr 19, 2009 1:00 AM PDT up reply actions  

We had no idea how to respond after getting worked in the first quarter

There has never been this much pressure on our players and they folded.

"The Rockets broke the heart-shaped lock on our diary and read it. They know our shirt sizes AND our shoe sizes. They know our ballboy’s girlfriend’s nickname. They own us." - nightbluefruit

by Sabonis4Ever on Apr 19, 2009 12:50 AM PDT up reply actions  

They were within 7 with 4 minutes to go in the 2 quarter, and then it all went to hell.

And Oden, once again, is a rookie, so non-stop fast break basketball is like fast-forwarding a song while he's trying to learn the lyrics.

by RipCity on Apr 19, 2009 12:52 AM PDT up reply actions  

we called time

and they busted out an 8-0 run in about a minute and twenty seconds. you very rarely see that out of our timeouts.

The Michael Ruffin of BlazersEdge, cuz Amlmart said so.

by BlazersOrBust on Apr 19, 2009 12:53 AM PDT up reply actions  

FIRE NATE!!!11111

apropos of nothing, a story from tonight. I’m sitting in my house, watching the game half-drunk and morose with my brother as we’re losing by 25, and this girl who’s at our party walks into the room and goes, “Why are you even watching this, the game is over.” We shoot her a hard look but say nothing. One of our buddies says half-jokingly, “Oh they’re coming back, you’ll see” and she goes, “I will give you a MILLION AND SEVEN dollars if Portland wins. They suck.” So being a good host, I continue to ignore this girl, but I’m seething now. She comes back in a couple of minutes later right as Roy misses a jumper and goes, “Oh my god he’s so overrated. That’s not even good basketball.” And I look at her and go, “Then don’t (foxtrot)ing watch it. You do not come to my house and talk (sierra) to me.” and she tries to stare me down and I just look at her and say, “Yeah, you.” She slinks out of the room and does not return for the remainder of the night. It was the only thing that happened tonight that made me feel good. :(

The Michael Ruffin of BlazersEdge, cuz Amlmart said so.

by BlazersOrBust on Apr 19, 2009 1:08 AM PDT up reply actions  

Long night huh?

Hey at least you didn’t fly up here to get a small vacation, and finally see your team in person for the first time during the season…

…and have them not even show up.

Could be worse. :)

by Timmay! on Apr 19, 2009 1:22 AM PDT up reply actions  

Though I won't be on BE for the next day or so

We’re headed to Seattle to see the M’s game today.

Hopefully I’ll see a team win during the trip!

by Timmay! on Apr 19, 2009 8:21 AM PDT up reply actions  

One of my best friends

is scrapped for cash (like most college students) and is the biggest Blazers fan I know (unlike most college students). He watched every game of that god-awful 21-win season, so you know his bonafides are good. He scoured the internets for hours to try to find two tickets on craigslist, with the help of his dad cobbled together enough money to buy two tickets at about four times face value, and then saw that game. Ouch.

The Michael Ruffin of BlazersEdge, cuz Amlmart said so.

by BlazersOrBust on Apr 19, 2009 6:54 AM PDT up reply actions  

Ahhh so you do indeed understand

I never wanted to hear the team apologize before. But after last night…

by Timmay! on Apr 19, 2009 7:55 AM PDT up reply actions  

I watched game 7 of the 2000 WCF with a girl like that

I hope she is dead now. Such a non-fun person.

GOD WE’RE SO AWFUL WE’LL NEVER WIN LOOK AT THAT WE’RE HORRIBLE.

No court would convict me.

Murderimer

by Mortimer on Apr 19, 2009 6:00 AM PDT up reply actions  

To make it worse

the party was not for the basketball game, it was a birthday party for a housemate. So you have this girl who’s NOT EVEN A BLAZERS FAN - I’ve never even MET her - and she has the temerity to start talking sierra solely because she sees how upset my brother and I are about the game. Believe me, if I could get an actual jury of my peers (sports-obsessed college students) terrible things would have happened to that girl and I would have been acquitted on all charges.

The Michael Ruffin of BlazersEdge, cuz Amlmart said so.

by BlazersOrBust on Apr 19, 2009 6:57 AM PDT up reply actions  

Something like...

Insofar as manifestations of BoB´s natural fan reactions are agreed by any and all concerned members of the jury to be totally unavoidable and essentially just, and are so stipulated; and considering BoB took the law into his own hands though, it is incumbent upon said heretofore mentioned fans… ehem… juries, to defer the otherwise pertinent honoring procedures.

"They didn't know it was impossible, so they did it"

by amlmart1 on Apr 19, 2009 8:09 AM PDT up reply actions   1 recs

You are such an abogado

who knew you could do it in two languages?

The Michael Ruffin of BlazersEdge, cuz Amlmart said so.

by BlazersOrBust on Apr 19, 2009 2:45 PM PDT up reply actions  

During game 7?

How did you possible keep your cool?

"The Rockets broke the heart-shaped lock on our diary and read it. They know our shirt sizes AND our shoe sizes. They know our ballboy’s girlfriend’s nickname. They own us." - nightbluefruit

by Sabonis4Ever on Apr 19, 2009 7:50 AM PDT up reply actions  

logical fallacy

the existence of evidence showing that young 50-plus-win teams tend to advance is NOT the same thing as there being “no evidence that being younger and less experienced makes you less likely to win”. Just not any evidence referenced in the Pelton article, you mean.

The Michael Ruffin of BlazersEdge, cuz Amlmart said so.

by BlazersOrBust on Apr 19, 2009 12:35 AM PDT up reply actions  

ok, then show me the evidence that young teams are less likely to win in the playoffs

based on everything I’ve read, young teams actually slightly overperform their regular season performance, on average. Hollinger wrote something about this on Casey’s blog a while ago.

by jksnake99 on Apr 19, 2009 12:36 AM PDT up reply actions  

I can't show it to you

because I don’t have it. I’m just saying that KP’s data set might not be telling the whole story.

Maybe there’s a strong, statistically significant correlation showing that those numbers don’t hold true for teams in the Pacific Northwest. Or less hypothetically and more relevant, perhaps the predictive value of the data he presents breaks down because the Blazers are significantly younger than the youngest team on that list, and the 1.5 year difference in mean age makes a big difference.

I’m not saying you’re wrong, necessarily. But I don’t think that WSJ article necessarily accounts for possible confounds either.

The Michael Ruffin of BlazersEdge, cuz Amlmart said so.

by BlazersOrBust on Apr 19, 2009 12:42 AM PDT up reply actions  

ok. We have the Hollinger piece and the Pelton piece suggesting young teams who do well in the regular season also do fine in the playoffs.

And we have conventional wisdom (but no evidence) saying that young teams will underpeform their regular season record in the playoffs.

I think I’ll go with Hollinger and Pelton on this one, and blame the Blazers for this game, not youth.

by jksnake99 on Apr 19, 2009 12:44 AM PDT up reply actions  

Don't get me wrong

I blame the Blazers for this game too and I dislike the “youth as crutch” ideology too, just not to the same extent you do.

But to play devil’s advocate (which I like so very much, after all) how much older was each one of the teams played by the seven teams that advanced? How much more playoff experience did they have? If the seven teams that advanced played teams of roughly similar ages and playoff experience levels, and the three teams that lost were defeated by older, more playoff-wizened squads, then that lends at least theoretical support to this idea that youth struggle in the playoffs (unless it’s matched up against other youth). You see what I’m saying? I generally agree with your point, but I don’t think you can base it on that one article to the extent that you are because it just didn’t give enough information.

The Michael Ruffin of BlazersEdge, cuz Amlmart said so.

by BlazersOrBust on Apr 19, 2009 12:49 AM PDT up reply actions  

Usually

The burden of proof is on the claim that there is a relationship. Those are some plausible hypothetical reasons why age—conditional on regular season success—could matter, but its not evidence.

by PoliSam on Apr 19, 2009 6:57 AM PDT up reply actions  

I agree

also, I now seem like a BE stalker. I swear I just got in here. :)

Suggesting plausible alternative results for the impact of age isn’t proof at all…but jk was saying above that there was “no evidence that age has an impact in the playoffs” based on KP’s article. I was saying that the existence of one kind of evidence is not the same thing as there being no existence of another kind, and gave a couple of hypothetical examples for what that evidence could be.

The Michael Ruffin of BlazersEdge, cuz Amlmart said so.

by BlazersOrBust on Apr 19, 2009 7:01 AM PDT up reply actions  

a positive spin

It is nice to see that Houston is getting out all their shooting fire in this game. I don’t see how they can shoot in excess of 60% again this series. Oden made Mutumbo pay on offense, by pushing Mutumbo around/aside. Brandon got his but not too many fouls. I guess if you hits few shots you get a called when you miss as Houston finished us off with free throws cement their win. I’m confident will make adjustments that will better the Blazers ion the next game.

by NWfan on Apr 19, 2009 12:12 AM PDT reply actions  

I have one thing to say, courtesy of Mike Tyson

“Everyone has a plan until they get punched in the face.”

Gotta get game two, a 7 game series can change real fast.

by TimG on Apr 19, 2009 12:14 AM PDT reply actions  

Sorry but Joel's numbers belie any type of game he had

He wanted Yao by himself to play him straight up and to take that responsibility on his shoulders. It failed in epic fashion. Yao Ming destroyed him like he wasn’t even there and that gave the rest of his team confidence.

We should have adjusted and fronted Yao before it was too late but we continued to let Joel play straight up defense. This allowed the Rockets perimeter guys to be able to take shots in confidence that it wouldn’t hurt them because Yao was beasting in the middle.

Next game we need to front Yao and put the pressure on the Rockets perimeter players to win this game at the start – instead of allowing Yao to start winning it for them.

by TSE on Apr 19, 2009 12:18 AM PDT reply actions  

honestly, I don't think I've been more terrified for the Blazers

than when I read Joel’s comments to Quick about wanting the challenge of shutting down Yao one on one. There’s pride, and then there’s stupidity. No offense to Joel, but Yao’s at a point right now where you just can’t guard him straight up in the post, no matter if you’re Joel, Greg, Bynum, or Howard. He’s just too skilled to be played one on one down there. It’s almost like Hakeem in 95. Robinson was the MVP that year, and Hakeem still blew him apart in the playoffs. Joel’s just going to have to suck it up and accept the help if we want any chance of winning this series.

by Royster on Apr 19, 2009 12:26 AM PDT up reply actions  

agreed

those were some pretty stupid comments from Joel, and he’s got to eat crow now.

by jksnake99 on Apr 19, 2009 12:27 AM PDT up reply actions  

Yao is head and shoulders above every other true center in terms of low post game

Duncan is probably the only other post player who has the skills, but he isn’t gifted with a 7’6", 280lb frame

by premthegrem on Apr 19, 2009 12:30 AM PDT up reply actions  

Yao might be the closest thing

to Duncan circa 2000-2003 that we’ll see for a long time. Some guys are just technicians down there (Duncan, Yao, and Gasol are the only guys off the top of my head). Even doubling will lead to a good shot somewhere, but anything is better than a guy shooting 100%.

by Royster on Apr 19, 2009 12:39 AM PDT up reply actions  

all jokes aside..

Blazers need to eat the head… seriously

"...Lies, damned lies, and statistics."

by Teri on Apr 19, 2009 10:26 AM PDT up reply actions  

Joel did want Yao by himself

But there is nothing Joel or anybody can do when a 7’6 guy shoots fadeaways. We absolutely have to front him and make the other Rockets beat us.

"The Rockets broke the heart-shaped lock on our diary and read it. They know our shirt sizes AND our shoe sizes. They know our ballboy’s girlfriend’s nickname. They own us." - nightbluefruit

by Sabonis4Ever on Apr 19, 2009 12:30 AM PDT up reply actions  

Oh no definitely I agree.

Yao is amazingly skilled and underrated because of his injury issues. He destroys anyone in a one-on-one situation except for maybe Shaq a few years ago.

Joel needs to realize immediately that he cannot do this one-on-one and the only way to make the rest of the Rockets beat them first instead of Yao is to accept the Fronting defensive scheme.

There is no shame in that at all, but Joel needs to get over the pride aspect and realize there is no pride to be gained by getting destroyed and being stubborn.

by TSE on Apr 19, 2009 12:33 AM PDT up reply actions  

It looks like you know what your talking about. We will see if Blazers can adjust.

And Oden, once again, is a rookie, so non-stop fast break basketball is like fast-forwarding a song while he's trying to learn the lyrics.

by RipCity on Apr 19, 2009 12:36 AM PDT up reply actions  

As a rockets fan...

Nothing scares me more than the F word… fronting

by hardgay on Apr 19, 2009 3:21 PM PDT up reply actions  

Good job, Dave

I agree with all you say. As I said in my fanpost just now, the Rockets haven’t truly “stolen homecourt advantage.” When the homecourt is truly important in the playoffs is in a Game 7, when the refs practially refuse to let the home team lose. (Why IS that? Subject for another tread.)

But now, as you say, the Blazers’ margin for error is reduced. Even assuming they absorb tonight’s lesson and the Rockets relax, resulting in a Game 2 Blazers’ win, there’s still the challenge of winning a playoff game in Houston. This Blazers’ squad has yet to demonstrate it can play physically enough to pull that one off.

BTW, I love Channing Frye, but I hope (and expect) that Nate tightens his rotation from here on out. Watching Channing passively let Yao, Scola, et al shove him out of the way and grab rebounds was enough to make me homicidal.

"We don't back down to nobody." --Joel Przybilla

by hurryup09 on Apr 19, 2009 12:19 AM PDT reply actions  

home court advantage is defined

as being that if you can win all your home games, you win the series, so yes, the rockets stole home court tonight. We can’t make it to that theoretical game 7 without being them in Houston, so the rockets most definitely have home court advantage at this point.

by Royster on Apr 19, 2009 4:34 AM PDT up reply actions  

You're technically correct; of course, the Blazers now have to win a game in Houston

But the real prize the Blazers won by being the #4 seed is still in effect. I don’t recall the exact stat, but it’s overwhelming: home teams almost NEVER lose in Game 7s. So the idea that what a team works for all season—home court advantage—is lost the minute they lose a game on their home court is simply not true. That’s especially the case when that home loss occurs in Game 1 or Game 2, when there’s still plenty of time to get a road win.

"We don't back down to nobody." --Joel Przybilla

by hurryup09 on Apr 19, 2009 4:30 PM PDT up reply actions  

No ball movement, no player movement, few assists

Portland can’t/won’t win if they do not move the ball (and palyers) for open shots. Having Roy play one-on-one in the hopes of fouling out Yao (and whining about the officiating) won’t get it done.

I doubt if Houston will be able to repeat its incredible shooting, but we have to move the ball more if anyone other than Roy is going to score. We’re too hung up on showing that Roy can score against Artest and Battier.

Yao was amazing tonight, but it’s one game. Stuff happens. Let’s go back to a team game rather than having 4 guys watch Roy play one-on-one. and stop whining about the refs . . .

by vcubed on Apr 19, 2009 12:22 AM PDT reply actions  

agreed

I got 6 years of playoff blue balls going on, and I'm ready to release. GO BLAZERS. ~Mortimer

by Philthyanimal on Apr 19, 2009 12:28 AM PDT up reply actions  

i feel that

it felt like the begining of the year, i hate, hate, hate, forcing the issue with LMA and roy isos, if it works, fine, but after the first 5 or 10 fails, swing the damn ball around! the ball usually never made it to the weakside, one of the few times it did, baseline dunk for batum.

by appel82 on Apr 19, 2009 9:32 AM PDT up reply actions  

Basically two things happened in this game:

The Blazers played at like 50% of their abilities and the Rockets at 150. Combine the two and you have a blowout. I highly doubt the Rockets can shoot over 60% again in this series. I also would like to think the Blazers will bounce back and play closer to normal.

Even though the Blazers “lost” home court, aren’t you glad game 2 is in Portland? I can’t imagine trying to bounce back after tonight’s performance if we were in Houston.

by JK47 on Apr 19, 2009 12:25 AM PDT reply actions  

lol

everybody made this about Artest/Battier versus BRoy, when the real battle was in the trenches. If the game plan was to get Roy looks, he certainly got those today. But Yao was disgusting. He was literally shooting the ball as if Joel Przybilla wasn’t even there, and Aaron Brooks/Luis Scola took over once Yao decided to call it a night. Shameful basketball.

by premthegrem on Apr 19, 2009 12:26 AM PDT reply actions  

sorry, shameful is the wrong word. Just disappointing, kind of a helpless frustration.

by premthegrem on Apr 19, 2009 12:27 AM PDT up reply actions  

this is definitely

not the most important reason we lost tonight, but I’m too tired and miserable to come up with the most important reason so I’ll just mention this one: LMA looked horrible against Scola and Landry in the post…but we didn’t run a Roy/LMA pick and pop one time, at least as far as I remember.

I understand wanting LMA to get in the paint and stay there, but dang, man, he was just getting roughed up tonight. So run the pick and pop! Executed well, it pulls defenders out of the lane and frees up Roy to attack the basket, gets LMA an open 18-footer, or ends up with a smaller defender switching onto LaMarcus.

The Michael Ruffin of BlazersEdge, cuz Amlmart said so.

by BlazersOrBust on Apr 19, 2009 12:33 AM PDT reply actions  

I was more dissappointed in LMA than I was in the loss.

What does a Blazer do? He blazes! Where? Up the trail. Why? Portland dunks the ball! Believe RubiOden will happen.

by by on Apr 19, 2009 1:24 PM PDT up reply actions  

One really weird takeaway from tonight...

… they need to stop serving beer at halftime.

There were a lot of very poorly behaved fans who started out happy, then drank out their unhappiness.

It was an ugly sight after the game tonight..

by Timmay! on Apr 19, 2009 12:51 AM PDT reply actions  

Bedge was worse

"The Rockets broke the heart-shaped lock on our diary and read it. They know our shirt sizes AND our shoe sizes. They know our ballboy’s girlfriend’s nickname. They own us." - nightbluefruit

by Sabonis4Ever on Apr 19, 2009 12:52 AM PDT up reply actions  

"started out happy, then drank out their unhappiness"

yeah, at least I had the decency to do that in the privacy of my home!

The Michael Ruffin of BlazersEdge, cuz Amlmart said so.

by BlazersOrBust on Apr 19, 2009 12:52 AM PDT up reply actions  

funny i thought

the blazers playing the worst game of the season was reason for the unhappiness. but yeah, booze can exaserbate emotions too…

by appel82 on Apr 19, 2009 9:36 AM PDT up reply actions  

Greg Oden needs to START

 Oden was the only dominant, consistent player tonight. Put him against Yao and the difference will be evident.

I'm on a Dolphin, doin flips and Sh@&. This Dolphins' splashin, gettin urrbody all wet.

by The Pwoortlund chraleblasers on Apr 19, 2009 1:34 AM PDT reply actions  

Oden WILL be great...

but not yet. As evident in the previous matches with Houston, Yao is still too big for Oden to effectively score against, and Oden defending Yao is basically shootaround.
The best action right now is for Oden to come off the bench and physically abuse Mutombo. That gives Oden confidence and also helps the team. One thing Oden has learned from Joel last night, is to swallow your pride.

by hardgay on Apr 19, 2009 3:30 PM PDT up reply actions  

Wow. Glad I didnt skip work for this one.

The adjustments Nate makes for Game 2 will show whether or not he has deserved a lot of the praise he has received for the Blazers’ success this year.

by BlazerBen on Apr 19, 2009 1:43 AM PDT reply actions  

Good Analysis

Most of the night Portland played 1- or 2-man offense instead of 4- or 5- man offense. This played right into the Rockets’ hands.

This strikes me as the key to a series in which our offense has got to find ways to produce to beat Houston. We are not going to shut them down defensively. Maddening when I see us return to Royball: that conservative half court iso game. Psychologically, the team retreats to that mode when it is beat. Can’t blame Brandon, but that approach will fail against this team. We must pass, find seams, and create opportunity on the offensive glass. Break them down with movement and flood the boards. I don’t care who takes the shot/makes the drive, but i want it coming off of three or more quick passes. And attack the offensive glass relentlessly until we see them get out on a break.

Once Houston started rolling Yao and his teammates got some courtesy calls from the refs which weren’t being reciprocated the other way.

Do not even think about the refs. This is playoff basketball. There is no time for this!!!

Rebounds and scoring off of assists should be our focus for game 2. I am hopeful that this loss will refocus us. We don’t need to think about winning this series. We need to think about how we can compete with the Houston Rockets. And that means bringing the attack. A relentless passing cutting attack. If we lose, we lose. Fine. At least we’ll learn something besides that we don’t like losing.

by Blazin' on Apr 19, 2009 2:06 AM PDT reply actions  

Agree
Most of the night Portland played 1- or 2-man offense instead of 4- or 5- man offense. This played right into the Rockets’ hands.

Definitely. I was pretty shocked at the offensive game plan. The Blazers did exactly what Houston wanted them to do: Isolation plays and slowly executed pick and rolls. There was little new in the game plan. Houston never had to make any adjustments. It was exactly what they expected. When a team doesn’t do one surprising thing against you on offense and you have two days to prepare for it, you feel pretty confident.

When the Blazers breakdown the tape of this game I think they will see that: The more movement that was used to set up the pick and roll, the more likely it was to succeed, and the more aggressively Brandon attacked, the more often it worked. If they give Houston time to think: “Okay, here comes the pick and roll… we need to do x,y,z” they are going to be ready; they are going to get their big, but somewhat slow footed defenders into position and its going to be hard to score.
 
The Blazers absolutely have to find a way to get LaMarcus some points. This is the best offensive match-up for the Blazers against Houston. I’d like to think he can take Scola one-on-one in the post, but if that’s the only plan and it doesn’t work, the series is over. It’s over. The Blazers will not win if he shoots 3-12… As in most games this season, post isolation for LaMarcus was how the Blazers opened the game last night. Scola did a nice job, however, taking away Aldridge’s bread and butter moves. Maybe the Blazers weren’t patient enough and abandoned this line of attack too quickly. I don’t know.

by PoliSam on Apr 19, 2009 6:52 AM PDT up reply actions  

I was screaming this all night long. Too much ISO. Pass the ball...get the Rockets D moving...

…stop worrying about trying to draw fouls, and worry about hitting the open man and scoring….the fouls will come on their own when the D gets out of position and is scrambling. Dave is entirely correct in his analysis….I hope the blazers read it.

by shocker315 on Apr 19, 2009 9:36 AM PDT up reply actions  

People complain about the calls

But watching the isos, it’s like we’re playing 1 on 4. What ref is gonna call a foul when a player is trying to make space where there is none? I wasn’t buying it. Houston wasn’t buying it. Why should the refs buy it?

by Blazin' on Apr 19, 2009 11:15 AM PDT up reply actions  

I dont think Lamarcus got "smothered"

I felt like they let scola guard him one-on-one most of the night. and sadly… he seemed to do a decent job of it.. even getting his own on the other side too.

that spells trouble. going to be watching that matchup.

by mandoman10 on Apr 19, 2009 2:47 AM PDT reply actions  

Scola is tough

And that’s Houston. Good man defense. Good team defense. We’re not going to beat them by posting then up. We need to pace them up.

by Blazin' on Apr 19, 2009 3:33 AM PDT up reply actions  

I'd like to see Aldridge try to draw some fouls on Scola...

The tough thing is that Scola plays D with his feet and his belly. He bumps, but he doesn’t hack. I hate to say it, but this is one match-up where officiating will be huge.

I think the move that is there for Aldridge against Scola is to use his height and length to shoot over the top Scola. Scola does not have the length or hops to block his shots and clearly tries to avoid fouling.

by PoliSam on Apr 19, 2009 7:02 AM PDT up reply actions  

the vertical thing is huge

we have to use our quickness to get up over them if that makes any sense.

by Blazin' on Apr 19, 2009 8:28 AM PDT up reply actions  

well

I would say, honestly, that his only move on scola (at least this stage in LMA development) is to use his height on scola (cause as you say he has no hops) which is what?

its the fadeaway!

in the first game he was trying to back him in then trying for some quick spins to the middle or to the baseline… scola is to strong and moves his feet to quickly for that.

LMA’s counter move should be to back in, turn baseline, and fadeaway. Ive seen him do it before. Not sure how consistent that move is for him for it to not be a sinkhole of death for the blazers.

by mandoman10 on Apr 19, 2009 9:11 AM PDT up reply actions  

I don't think the post-up can be our bread and butter in this series.

Their help defense is too good. They get dense in the middle. Maybe GO is the exception. No I think we need to try to play an uptempo. At least it’s worth a shot. But it means getting Brandon and LaMarcus to break out of their laconic iso modes and work the ball around.

by Blazin' on Apr 19, 2009 9:42 AM PDT up reply actions  

it's hard to start a fast break when

the other team makes all thier baskets, the rockets transisition d was good too.

by appel82 on Apr 19, 2009 9:44 AM PDT up reply actions  

Play fast.

It doesn’t mean necessarily a fast break. It means when the ball is in your hands you are attacking and passing and cutting. Not “settling in” which is what we do on offense. Specifically, it is what Brandon does.

Portland has the slowest paced offense in the league. That has served us. But perhaps against the Rockets, it will not.

by Blazin' on Apr 19, 2009 10:03 AM PDT up reply actions  

well i guess i am thinking

that if they dont have an advantage over scola in the post… then they can’t win the series. i think dave up there kind of gets that.

like “just” running might be the better option.. but it wont get them the win in the series. The rockets have significant post advantage and the blazers need to mitigate that with their own. Either LMA figures scola out or its kuputz.

by mandoman10 on Apr 19, 2009 10:04 AM PDT up reply actions  

maybe so

hard to recast a team’s identity on a dime. Obviously, there will be some posting up. Greg had some success with it, and Lamarcus will have better success in the rest of the series. But we need a counterpoint.

Nate was talking about upping the tempo when we first got the playoff match-up, don’t know why we never tried it. One thing I will say, Houston is in a comfort zone when we slow it down and stop passing the ball.

by Blazin' on Apr 19, 2009 10:16 AM PDT up reply actions  

The officials allowed Scola to manhandle LaMarcus

More than anything else, that appeared to be the biggest advantage they gave Houston.

And it was a lot more than “feet and belly”. Scola grabbed, banged, shoved, … just about everything but reach into his shorts and squeeze his nut sack. Not a thing from the refs.

hakkaa päälle !

by timg56 on Apr 20, 2009 7:44 AM PDT up reply actions  

wow

i completely disagree. scola was like a rock down there. he moved his feet when LMA tried to get around him and stood his ground when he tried to back him down.

playoffs.

LMA just needs to go to his counter-move the baseline fadaway. Scola can’t get up there and it would open up the turn to the middle.

by mandoman10 on Apr 20, 2009 9:03 AM PDT up reply actions  

Learning curve

This is like the freshman kid the first day of high school, yeah, homeroom is down THAT hall, kid, and freshman is late to class. Sophomore is LHAO ha ha ha! That is Houston right now. Now lets see how the Blazers react. What is even more important now is how they do on their first road game in the Playoffs. Their is such a thing as a learining curve and next year we won’t need a rally before the playoffs because we have been their already.

by Tennore on Apr 19, 2009 6:22 AM PDT reply actions  

Take from an outsider:

You guys had more of an adjustment to make than other, similarly young teams.

The reason is style of play. Physicality isn’t necessarily Portland’s definining trait, but it is the biggest difference between the regular- and post-season. Other young teams – Chicago for instance – don’t really have much in the way of the skill department (comparatively), but they’ve always played a physical game. It’s how they’ve had to survive as players. When you add this to the fact that you played a team chock full of experienced bruisers, it’s easy to see how a route could happen.

Happen once, that is.

I’ve got Portland in 6. Good luck all.

The poster formerly known as Freethefro.

by MPG on Apr 19, 2009 7:00 AM PDT reply actions  

Oh, and-

more Oden!

The poster formerly known as Freethefro.

by MPG on Apr 19, 2009 7:01 AM PDT up reply actions  

interesting analysis

thanks for your thoughts, they’re very pertinent. also thanks for not coming in here and kicking us while we’re down and you’re filled with the euphoria of a fantastic upset win. :)

The Michael Ruffin of BlazersEdge, cuz Amlmart said so.

by BlazersOrBust on Apr 19, 2009 7:03 AM PDT up reply actions  

My pleasure.

The Blazers are kind of my adopted western conference team. You all will feel better Tuesday night.

The poster formerly known as Freethefro.

by MPG on Apr 19, 2009 7:05 AM PDT up reply actions  

Dave, another point that I liked a lot
Unfortunately by the time the Blazers figured that out they were down 15 with shaken confidence. Trying to come back against the Rockets is a difficult task at any point, but with everything rolling right for them and the Blazers, through shock or discouragement, abandoning nearly everything that got them here a comeback just wasn’t going to happen.

I know an announcer (or bystander) doesn’t understand sports when, in a big game, they marvel that one of the teams is “playing without much energy. They need to show more fire.” As if one team just wanted the game more and the other just didn’t care enough.

It was abundantly clear to me that several of the Blazers panicked in this game. The most important effect of Yao’s early run was not the points scored, but fear it provoked in the Blazers. In a normal game, if you miss a couple of shots, it doesn’t matter. The other team will miss more. You know the game is long and you have time to come back. In the game last night, Yao makes 5 shots in a row early in the game and all of sudden the Blazers are thinking, “O no! We cannot afford to miss ANY SHOTS. We CANNOT LOSE. We cannot lose homecourt advantage. I better make all of my shots. I better not make any mistakes…etc, etc. .” In short, Yao’s early start shook their confidence and their nerves got the better of them.

by PoliSam on Apr 19, 2009 7:20 AM PDT reply actions  

Houston did whay they said they had to do

take the crowd out of the game early. They executed there plan to perfection. Its easy to say Portland played bad but that was totally the rockets executing and Portland not getting any rebounds to get the break going. I doubt Houston can shoot that well 2 games in a row they were hitting tre’s 3-4 feet behind the line that was rediculous.(Oh, stop treating Yao with kid gloves punish him physically on both ends)

How many Portland players were knocked to the ground or had to go to the bench for quick treatment? 3 that I remember. This can be stopped hit them first put them on there backside when they drive in the paint. You can’t do it all night but its worth a couple early fouls to send the message the paint is closed tonight.

I try to help with everything," Fernandez said. "If the coach says go rebound, I go rebound. I work for the team.

""If I'm playing this game to get media and attention, I shouldn't be here," Aldridge said. "I'm here to play basketball, and do what I can do to help this team win."

by Dragonage on Apr 19, 2009 7:59 AM PDT reply actions  

huh?

“I doubt Houston can shoot that well 2 games in a row they were hitting tre’s 3-4 feet behind the line that was rediculous”

please point out ONE three pointer Houston made that was not (a) a corner 3 [aka “the most efficient shot in basketball”] or (b) an Aaron Brooks shot from the top of the key, and not “3-4 feet” behind the arc.

the only other one I can think of is the Artest shot where he ducked under the defender and actually leaned in to shoot… making it a closer shot.

The Rockets attempted ONE deep three the whole game… and Battier missed that attempt to get a 2-for-1 at the end of the first half.

by grungedave on Apr 19, 2009 9:20 AM PDT up reply actions  

Artest hit 2 long tre's from at least 2 feet beyond the arc and I would argue three

Brooks also hit a three from way out top he might have been closer to 4 ft from the basket

I try to help with everything," Fernandez said. "If the coach says go rebound, I go rebound. I work for the team.

""If I'm playing this game to get media and attention, I shouldn't be here," Aldridge said. "I'm here to play basketball, and do what I can do to help this team win."

by Dragonage on Apr 19, 2009 2:32 PM PDT up reply actions  

The most efficient shot in basketball is a dunk

"The Rockets broke the heart-shaped lock on our diary and read it. They know our shirt sizes AND our shoe sizes. They know our ballboy’s girlfriend’s nickname. They own us." - nightbluefruit

by Sabonis4Ever on Apr 19, 2009 11:36 PM PDT up reply actions  

good stuff

Sure it was dissapointing, but it was exactly what the PTB needed. Alot of chatter about the youth/experience factor mattering/not mattering. I say it was why what happened happened. From the first possession it was clear the Rockets knew how to play playoff basketball. Much more physical and an allowance by the refs to let them play that way. Portland never responded with a gut check, and the Rockets stepped on the PTB’s throat for good measure. I’d chalk this up to our guys simply not having the experience to know its not just another regular season game. Brandon was literally just throwing himself into Yao hoping the refs would bail him out with the call. He may as well have been jumping into a brick wall. Blake showed no energy and looked lost trying to keep up with Brooks. Lamarcus was outplayed as the Rockets clamped down on him. Outlaw was hesitant to play his game, and when Travis starts to think instead of just play (Don’t say anything!) his game suffers and he couldnt get into rythm. Rudy was stymied against a aggressive and rough defense. Frye was useless. Nate did not have the guys mentally prepared for the game, and it looked like a horrible game plan from the start.

Go down the list of Blazers and each guy gets the finger pointed at. Unless the PTB amp up their energy and willingness to at least match up to the Rockets physical play, this series is already over.

That being said, I’m not that disappointed. The team has accomplished alot this season and there is no reason to think the team won’t be as good or better next year. I believe the PTB are still the future of the NBA.

I AM A PORTLAND TRAIL BLAZERS SUPPORTER.

by bow4meow on Apr 19, 2009 10:01 AM PDT reply actions   1 recs

thoughts

Refs were poor early. Not that any particular call was bad, but that they were calling tick tack stuff on one end, but letting the guys play on the other. This stopped mattering about 6 minutes into the game, but it sure didn’t help us early.

Our much vaunted offense was terrible: Right from the tip, we played nothing but 1 on 1 offense all night long. No player movement, no ball movement. nothing but iso offense. Terrible. In the 2nd quarter, when we had the lead in the 7 to 10 range, we had several opportunities in a row to cut it even more (we actually got a couple stops in there!). What did we do? come down the court and hoist up a contest 22 footer with a ton of time on the shot clock.

We panicked: After Houston got off to the hot start we had no answer. We had been in that situation many times this year. Tonight, we didn’t handle it well at all. Welcome to the playoffs.

Game 2 should tell us a lot about the makeup of this PTB team. I’m anxious to see it.

How did you guys win that?
"We scored enough points. We scored 107, they scored 105.
-Nate McMillan Postgame, 3/4/2009

by douglast on Apr 19, 2009 10:20 AM PDT reply actions  

Attack!

Blazers need to attack the basket, and more quickly. And see if more minutes from Oden will work, whether or not he is going against Yao or Mutumbo.

by Monochromo on Apr 19, 2009 10:31 AM PDT reply actions  

And yet

Vegas line had the Blazers by 5 in game one. Now, they’re favored by 6 in game two. They watched the same game we did. Time to get off the ledge…

by Engineering Problem on Apr 19, 2009 10:37 AM PDT reply actions  

it kills me...

but I have to agree with this. The Rockets won’t play “worse” on Tuesday, but I fear the Blazers are going to come out with their hair on fire. I hope Yao and Artest don’t pick up 2 quick fouls each. That’s the only thing I am truly worried about.

by grungedave on Apr 19, 2009 12:27 PM PDT up reply actions  

honestly, maybe Yao isn't due

but at the very least, Scola and Ron are due. They averaged over 6 fouls between them in the regular season, and had basically zero called on them this game (Scola had one, but it came in garbage time). It’s simply baffling to think that you could be playing as physical as they were while guarding a team’s two best players and not pick up any fouls. LeBron is the only guy who gets officiated like that in the league more than one game in a row.

by Royster on Apr 19, 2009 12:44 PM PDT up reply actions  

it's also statistically improbable

to score 30 points in the paint and shoot 60-65% before garbage time sets in. So I’m not that worried.

draft dejuan blair

by Cablinasian on Apr 19, 2009 12:53 PM PDT up reply actions  

Vegas does not care what the final score is

They care what we, the fans and bettors, think the final score would be. Why don’t more people get that?

They want equal money on both sides of the line 500 for Rockets beat the spread, 500 for Blazers cover. They want to make the juice, period. The casinos couldn’t care less who is ACTUALLY going to win. They want to know what we think

www.TheDreamShake.com Co-Founder and Writer

by UofTOrange on Apr 19, 2009 1:06 PM PDT up reply actions  

You are right, the bookies don't care whose going to win, but the people placing the bets do...

The odds have to cover the bets placed. Talk is cheap. At least the gamblers are “putting their money where their mouth is”, which lends a certain credibility that I can take some encouragement from. My confidence took a hit as an observer, which is what most people are. Only the team/coaches and particularly sophisticated observers (of whom we have some here) have a good handle on how bad the game one loss was or wasn’t. I do expcet to see a different Blazer team, in terms of intensity and strategy, on Tuesday. We will be better. And, hopefully, the Rockets won’t be quite as good. Still very interesting.

by Berkeley on Apr 19, 2009 4:06 PM PDT up reply actions  

You have no idea where the gamblers that actually know what they are talking about have their money

That line could be Rockets by 10 or it could be Blazers by 10. The majority of money bet in Vegas or on the internet is by idiots.

I think smart money would be on Portland winning game two, but I don’t know if it is on covering 6 or not. Could be, that’s pretty close to reasonable. It will almost assuredly be a closer game than game 1

www.TheDreamShake.com Co-Founder and Writer

by UofTOrange on Apr 20, 2009 4:40 PM PDT up reply actions  

This was just like Opening Night

And we ended up okay after that.

It sucked at the time, but we calmed down and more than looked like we belonged afterwards.

Remember how awful we looked that game, after all the build up and hype? Blown out by the Lakers, first game of the entire NBA season for anybody, Oden goes down… it was awful.

This Rockets team will not likely score like that again. They’re actually not very good offensively, and that was a special night for them. We weren’t THAT bad defensively, but we weren’t sharp— and offensively we were pretty bad, compared to how we usually are. Now we can see it’s four 4th quarters and how we close games is needed for 48 minutes, and once you win a game we’ll all feel a lot better.

If THEY can beat US at home, we can beat them. Let’s just get this next one, get that win.

(That’s my brilliant gameplan).

Mortimer

by Mortimer on Apr 19, 2009 12:54 PM PDT reply actions  

Boiling the complex down to the essential basics is characteristic of brilliance.

I like the plan. I can be a simpleton myself at times. :-) Far from giving up just yet.

by Berkeley on Apr 19, 2009 4:14 PM PDT up reply actions  

That's what I wrote on Twitter. It felt very much like that all over again.

WE ARE READY!!! – Oh wait, looks like we aren’t yet.

Hard to say if it was mostly surprise about the way things work in the playoffs or a bad day for major players (LMA, Blake, Travis, …) or Houston is just a very bad matchup. Likely some combination of those things. My hope is the Blazers really put on a fight in game 2 to get back into the series. There is still a good chance, and as I said I vividly remember the same #4 vs. #5 series of the Mavs in 2005, who were down 0-2 losing both home games (close, but game 2 on a gut-wrenching last shot by T-Mac) when everyone declared them dead, and they came back to win it 4-3 blowing the Rockets out of the water in game 7.

Go Blazers!

by Norsktroll on Apr 19, 2009 4:27 PM PDT up reply actions  

Great recap as always

you are right, the Blazers stopped making the officials makie calls when we were on offense. Fairness has never been a reality in life and certainly never has been to an NBA official. That being said, the area where the officials really ticked me off was when Roy was on the floor injured. There should have been an injury timeout there at the change of possession according to the rules. they risked injuring Roy further and gave Houston a big advantage there.

I think in game two we got to get Oden more offense early. We have never gotten the ball into him routinely during the regular season, but now is the time, it may be the only way to get aldridge some openings around the hoop.

In any event we got to take the ball right at Yao, he is big with quick hands, but otherwise he is slow, drive right at him and hook a bounce pass behind like Roy did to a crashing oden (or pryz). You are right on the money, when we pull back into a fade we will never get the call or make anything happen

Support families in crisis in Portland www.give10tell10.org

by PDXBuckeye on Apr 19, 2009 1:03 PM PDT reply actions  

ummm

if that’s the case, please explain the 4th foul on Yao with 6:30 left in the third when Brandon Roy acted as if he was shot… ??

by grungedave on Apr 19, 2009 10:24 PM PDT up reply actions  

In reading the players comments...

I am more then a little concerned.
They seem to think they just had a bad game, and Houston played lights out.
Truth is Houston played there game plan, and will play again tonight.
Unless Portland makes adjustments its going to be a short series.

PS, Stop blaming the refs!

by MotoMan045 on Apr 21, 2009 4:01 PM PDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

The ultimate coverage and analysis of the Portland Trail Blazers.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Blazers_win_small
Blazers F Luke Babbitt Named to 2012 NBA All-Star Team
Small
Thunderous Manboobies
Img_0878_1__small
Why do we hate LaMarcus Aldridge?
Small
Oregonlive "journalists" 2 new posts...same old drivel
2474796688_7cdc78828f_o_small
Greg Oden Suffers Life-Ending Injury; Gets 3-Year Extension

Recent FanPosts

Small
LaMarcus Aldridge about to become the 10th highest scorer in Blazers franchise  history
Small
The Blazers Future Regarding Free Agent Signings
Small
New trade that gets us a new point and a three point shooter
Small
Portland getting.....
Small
The Sun Behind the Clouds: Blazers still on track.
Blazers_small
What are we missing?
Red_blazer_logo_small
The Felton Trade, Linsanity, and the PG Position 1 year from now
Small
Effort?
Small
WE NEED JOSE CALDERON ASAP.

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

FanShots

Quick hits of video, photos, quotes, chats, links and lists that you find around the web.

Recommended FanShots

Blazers Broadcasters Mike Barrett and Mike Rice re-enacted NBA referee Scott Foster's controversial goaltending call on Portland Trail Blazers forward LaMarcus Aldridge, who was defending Oklahoma City Thunder All-Star forward Kevin Durant, during this week's edition of Blazers Courtside. Remarkably, no one was injured during the taping of this segment.

Original video of the play here. 
Quotes from the players and coaches here. 
The NBA admitting it got the call wrong here. 
Dave's  extended thoughts here. 
BlazersMakr's FanShot: Major Vegas action on OKC prior to tip here. 
Audio of Chad Doing of 750 AM The Game going HAM on Foster here.

OK, that should just about wrap up the goaltending discussion.

Courtside video via Blazers Broadcasting cameraman John Curry.

-- Ben Golliver | benjamin.golliver@gmail.com | Twitter
In 2008 Tim Donaghy indicated that Scott Foster was a ref that also fixed games
Blazers Owner Paul Allen Ranked No. 3 American Philanthropist In 2011
Rhino
I'm sure you've all heard the news by now that I'm having a scope on my...

Recent FanShots

Congratulations to Portland Trail Blazers forward LaMarcus Aldridge, on his first All Star selection.

As seen on www.trailblazers.com
AWoj: Aldridge an All Star
It's pretty clear that the season is over already ;)
Double rainbow of sadness:

1) JBay is getting shorter
2) We never got to see him with a mustache

I miss you tiny raptor man.

via The Basketball Jones http://blogs.thescore.com/tbj/2012/02/09/things-of-note-for-february-9-2012/#more-34561
CRAZY stat from Houston game
NBA MVP Rankings... LMA @ #10
Celtics interested in Rondo - Gasol swap? ...
Batum - Top 10 NBA Sixth Men
Outside the Garden after every home game on the SE corner!


Jessie Sponberg and his crew are collecting the Chalupas for several outreach programs here in Portland! They will be outside the Rose Garden on the SE corner by the busses after every game!
Four Haikus About Bonzi Wells

+ New FanShot All FanShots >


Editors

Kitten_small Dave

Headshotsmall_small Ben Golliver

Lead Moderators

Getfuzzy-satchel_small Timmay!

Bucky3_small Cablinasian

Authors

Plainlc_small Storyteller

Moderators

Lamb_small T Darkstar

Small douglast

Terryporter_small prezofdeath

Small usmcr3049

Lrg_magpie_small Corvid

Wallpaper_small geoffm