Blazersedge: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
New Blog: RSL Soapbox for Real Salt Lake Fans!

A thought on tie-breakers

First off, let me state that, if the Blazers wanted to avoid these tiebreaker scenarios, perhaps they should have won just one more game over the course of the season. I'll also make the assumption that all divisions are roughly equal and that wins are the true measure of what team is best over the regular season.

But...

Why is "divison winner" the first tiebreaker for playoff seeding? San Antonio is the #3 and Portland is the #4 because San Antonio won their division, and therefore get a tiebreaker. Except that, the only reason that San Antonio wins the division is because their divisonal rival, the Rockets, are one game worse than our divisional rival, the Nuggets. That is, San Antonio is winning the tiebreaker because they have a worse team in their division than does Portland.

Think about this - it makes no sense. Portland hade a theoretically tougher schedule - playing additional games against Denver rather than Houston, still manages to post an equal record, and gets penalized by the rules.

A more sensical process would be, say, record against ther 3rd division in the conference, head-to-head, etc. But divison winner is so dependant on strength of divison that it's really unfair to use as the first tiebreaker.

0 recs  |  Comment 9 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

another one of Stern's dumb after-the-fact justifications

He keeps saying that he wants “the division to mean something.” So he forces arbitrary rules whenever possible simply to justify his arbitrary views. Don’t try to make sense of it.

by kickbrass on Apr 16, 2009 8:02 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

We'll like it if it ever works to our advantage.

But it’s hard to imagine another team going 82-0 like us. :p

Of all the things that can be expressed in the printed word – love, hate, fear, joy – true humor is the one that is the most difficult of all. Sarcasm, for example, is an art of delicate subtlety. Yet too many people wield it as a bulldozer – loud, smelly, ugly, and destructive – and think they are being funny.

by T Darkstar on Apr 16, 2009 8:04 AM PDT reply actions   1 recs

We only had a theoretically tougher schedule

if you only look at games against Denver for us. We also got extra games against OKC, Minny, and Utah, which are all worse than Houston, NO, and Dallas.

The division record means something to normalize slightly for division strength. The Southwest, as a whole, was a slightly tougher division than the Northwest this year, so because we finished with the same record, SA gets the tiebreaker because they theoretically had a slightly tougher schedule.

by Royster on Apr 16, 2009 8:23 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Somethign less

arbitrary than division winner at least. Maybe strength of schedule and margin of victory.

I hope I can get a bunch of championships, like 15. " - Greg Oden

by mxpx5678 on Apr 16, 2009 9:30 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

meh. it is what it is

i think it’s kind of silly to add this tiebreaker in to trump the more sensical “head to head” one that has always worked fine before, but whatever.

Hey David – if you want to make divisions mean something, then devise a schedule that is more division-game heavy. As it is now, teams play 6 of the 10 non-divisional conference teams the same number of time they play divisional teams. Get it done with already – either drop some of those game and add more divisional games, or just get rid of divisions and have 2 15-team conferences in name. You already have it in practice.

How did you guys win that?
"We scored enough points. We scored 107, they scored 105.
-Nate McMillan Postgame, 3/4/2009

by douglast on Apr 16, 2009 9:33 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

nfl playoff system?

some teams will get screwed with a crappy division winner getting an auto bid but it should have no implications on seeding just getting an auto bid…

its lame to use it as a tiebreaker

by Blazerland on Apr 16, 2009 10:13 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Ties are ties

Anyway you break them is fair, because it’s actually a tie, so no matter who you give them to is equally good.

by pualo on Apr 16, 2009 2:19 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

A site by Blazer fans, for Blazer fans
Start posting about the Trail Blazers »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Winged_vitory_small
Whither Sports
Ep_109_starvinmarvin_small
11/24 JD - Feelin' Froggy? Then Leap!
Imgp4868_small
Taking Back the Neighborhood...
Small
What a difference a year makes. Warning: contains no Blake, Roy, McMillan insults
Trogdor_small
I think it's time to blow this 'Roy' experiment up.

Recent FanPosts

Gorilla_w_boombox_small
POLL: Who would win a Blazer dunk contest?
Oden_small
Should Brandon Roy start at PG?
Oden-hulk_small
Point Guard Dilemma
Small
What do you guys think of Canzano/Quick's coverage of the Blazers these days?
Dscn06250517_1_small
Let's Celebrate GREG ODEN !!!
Gertjonnys1_small
What is wrong with being a homer?

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

FanShots

Quick hits of video, photos, quotes, chats, links and lists that you find around the web.

Recommended FanShots

oden's interview with nba.com
Historic photo of 1st Israeli & 1st Iranian to play in NBA: Omri Casspi & Hamed Haddadi
A modest proposal: Fire Mike Rice and Antonio Harvey!
For Ann, and Travis.

Recent FanShots

A.I. to Tanzania
KD: Good or Bad? Prof. Winston Refutes Bill Simmons
Does Roy Read Blazers Edge?
Nates Thoughts After Bulls Defeat
The Most Overrated Team In The NBA - Rob Johnson
Point Guard Dilemma
trade ideas...
Good old days

+ New FanShot All FanShots >


Editors

Kitten_small Dave

Ben_small Ben.

Moderators

Pict1126_small -ken

Polar_bear_small jorga

Terryporter_small prezofdeath

Small usmcr3049

Jesus_icon_i_small T Darkstar

Wallpaper_small geoffm