Game 80 Recap: Blazers 87, Clippers 72 (with seeding update)
General Observations
Basketball can be a complex, nuanced game. Or it can be like this game: simple and straightforward. The story tonight was obvious. The team that got the ball into the paint and did something with it prospered. The other team languished.
In the first quarter that prospering team must have been a nanosecond off in its space-time phasing and thus invisible to those of us in the normal temporal stream. The two teams we could see looked pretty ugly. The Blazers settled for jumpers. They dumped the ball to a scorer and abdicated responsibility for anything that happened after that. They went one-on-one. They kept the ball on one side of the court too much and too long. That offense wasn't stylish. It wasn't effective. It was "I just walked in on grandma changing her bra" ugly. The highlight of the whole first quarter was when the Blazer cameras caught a woman who looked almost exactly like Tina Fey sitting in the stands in a Blazer jersey. I fell instantaneously and irrevocably in love. Keep your Britneys and your Pamela Lees. Give me a funny girl with fantastic auburn hair and smart glasses with a Portland jersey on. Oh man.
Anyway...what were we talking about? Oh yeah. Quarter two.
After beating our heads against a brick wall trying to treat this like a YMCA game in the first quarter the Blazers finally decided to play ball in the second. They broke away from the Clippers by forcing turnovers and running, getting quick offense before the defense got set, and moving the ball in the halfcourt. They started setting some nice interior picks which not only freed shooters and cutters, but those same interior players as well. They started grabbing offensive rebounds too. All of a sudden the 17-17 tie after one became a 46-31 lead at the half.
Portland kept the clamps on defensively for a couple minutes in the third. But during that same time they settled for jumpers again and missed every one. Then the Clippers started playing with energy, getting inside, offensive rebounding, and doing all the things Portland did to get ahead in the first place. Portland's starters fought enough to keep most of the lead intact but when the bench came in with L.A. still cruising on momentum the Blazers looked like they were swimming with bowling balls attached to their feet. Scoring a point per minute is fantastic if you're a player. When your team does it, it's not so good. That's what the Blazers did from 5:45 in the third to 7:05 left in the fourth. By that time the game was tied.
At the 7:05 mark in came Steve Blake, Joel Przybilla, and LaMarcus Aldridge. All of a sudden the middle is clogged against the Clippers. All of a sudden Portland starts claiming rebounds again. All of a sudden 2 out of every 3 shots are at the rim. And then Rudy hit a couple threes. Oh, I'm sorry L.A. Did you think you were going to come all the way back? That would mess up our entire weekend, I'm afraid, so no. Good try, though. Here Zach, take a couple of charity field goal attempts at the end to pad your stats. It'll make you feel better.
Despite making it way harder than it had to be, basically by letting the Clippers outhustle them, the Blazers walk away with the same 15-point margin they held at the half.
It's hard to tell whether the Blazers or the Clippers held the Clippers to 38% shooting, but either way that was the stat of the game. By virtue of going inside longer than L.A. did the Blazers also owned a 27-11 advantage in free throw attempts. Rebounding and turnovers were pretty even. Portland had a fairly low 14 assists on 32 made shots tonight. That's not the way they play best.
We saw again that a primary opposing strategy is to put two men on Brandon Roy whenever he touches the ball. The Clippers were also devoting two men to LaMarcus and everybody who touched the ball near the rim whenever possible. If the Clippers can pull that off you can bet our playoff opponent is going to give it some run. The people over in the OregonLive chat rooms may be talking about whether free throws could doom us in the playoffs but the people over here should be considering whether we lack one extra scorer to keep defenses occupied. If the Blazers pass the ball freely and smartly and are hitting their outside shots nobody can stop them. But when the ball gets gummed up there's nobody to release the pressure. Rudy fills that role sometimes and Outlaw as well but neither consistently enough yet. Aldridge is certainly a proficient scorer but you know when he's going to get the ball and make his move. He's not a guy who surprises you often. You can adjust to him even if you can't stop him. This may be the drawback to the Przybilla, Batum, Blake trio around the stars. On the other hand I can't think of one of those three guys I'd not like to have in there. Nevertheless this may be one of the reasons we have trouble going deep this year. Maybe time adjusts it as Rudy, Travis, and Batum develop. But that time isn't here yet.
Individual Observations
--Brandon Roy looked kind of tired. He had to fight hard for everything again. He looked frustrated getting bumped around as well. He still gave us 15 points, 4 assists, 3 rebounds, and 2 steals. Plus he hogged a lot of defensive attention which helped other people get off shots when the ball was moving.
--LaMarcus Aldridge again started out cold but began to get aggressive as the game wore on. He had a game-high 21 points plus 9 rebounds, 2 assists, 2 steals, and a block. He outplayed Z-Bo handily. It was a good overall effort.
--Steve Blake had a rough offensive night with 3-10 shooting but he hit a couple of zingers and changed the momentum of the game as the last-ditch outlet on offense. He ended up with 10 points, 5 assists, 4 rebounds, and 2 steals.
--Joel Przybilla was a man inside and really allowed us to take this game. If you want somebody to control the interior you call Przybilla. 10 points, 14 rebounds, and a bunch of nifty bumping and grinding.
--Nicolas Batum didn't have quite the same target as he did last night which means he didn't have as obvious of an effect on the game. He did score a couple times off the dribble. 4 points, a rebound, and a steal in 13 minutes.
--Rudy Fernandez almost singlehandedly made up for a lackluster performance by the bench. He shot 50% from everywhere possible except the foul line where he was 100%. He had 4 rebounds, 2 assists, and 2 steals, finishing with 13 points and lifting us out of the doldrums. One of his assists was a beautiful over-the-shoulder, no-look alley-oop to LaMarcus on a designed play coming out of a timeout. The cameras caught him afterwards giving us that little sexy-cool swag look coming back down the court. Priceless. Rudy may be officially back.
--Travis Outlaw, on the other hand, had a 3-14 night. Some of his jumpers went so far astray they could have counted for two misses. 6 points and 2 rebounds in 21 minutes. Not so nice. We'll need Travis back for the playoffs.
--Greg Oden had a mixed evening. He had 6 rebounds in 17 minutes which is plenty good. He didn't really control space like Joel Przybilla though. He had some defensive lapses and never got on track offensively, going 1-2 for 4 points. I wanted a little more from Greg this game against Kaman, Randoph, and Camby.
--Sergio Rodriguez had a couple of aggressive shots in an otherwise forgettable game. He wasn't awful but he wasn't that productive either. 4 points, no assists, 2 turnovers in 12 minutes.
Final Thoughts and Seeding Ramifications
You kind of knew this game would only look good when it was over and that's exactly how it turned out. It's a good thing the Blazers have learned how to win ugly this year. Now the road games are over and the team can concentrate on Oklahoma City on Monday night, which could be the night that decides our final seeding. (If we're lucky, maybe not.)
The current standings in the West, 2-7:
- 2. Denver 53-27
- 3. Houston 52-28
- 4. Portland 52-28
- 5. San Antonio 51-28
- 6. New Orleans 48-31
- 7. Dallas 48-31
- 8. Utah 47-33
As you can see, with this win the Blazers now cannot finish any lower than the 5th seed in the West.
The only other game that really mattered today was the Jazz losing to the Warriors. They are now in 8th place, two games behind Dallas and New Orleans with two games to play. Utah holds the tiebreaker over New Orleans but Dallas holds it over Utah so the Jazz can now finish no higher than 7th.
Two significant games happen Sunday as Dallas plays at New Orleans and San Antonio faces the Kings in Sacramento.
The really important night, as we just said, is Monday. On Monday the Rockets host the New Orleans Hornets, San Antonio travels to Golden State for the second night of a back-to-back, Denver hosts Sacramento, and the Blazers play the Thunder in the Rose Garden. If Denver wins that game they will claim the Northwest Division. If by some miracle they lose, provided Portland wins Wednesday night's game against the Nuggets in Portland will be for the division crown. Heads up now: clear your schedule for Monday night. There will be a lot of basketball to follow.
Check out the impressions of tonight's game at ClipsNation.
Click here to review the Gameday Open Threads if you wish.
The Jersey Contest Playoff update will come shortly.
--Dave (blazersub@yahoo.com)
0 recs |
74 comments
|
Comments
What's your take on the Clips announcers?
I actually kind of liked them.
by tominrehab on Apr 11, 2009 11:42 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Me too.
They recognize that your viewers already know your team inside and out, so give some attention to the other guys so we get more familiar with them and their style of play.
Then again, maybe I just liked the fact that they were raving about us during the beginning. Which is, I imagine, the only raving you’ll get to do if you cover the Clippers.
by dlewis22 on Apr 11, 2009 11:44 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I liked them too
but it is easy to like announcers who are drooling over your team
I could not decide if I liked this or if it was some pathetic self loathing behavior
either way I would not mind a break from the mikes for a Clips game.
Life is exhausting when you are this stupid.
by jonestr on Apr 12, 2009 12:07 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Decent
I like their unbiasedness… they didn’t even attempt to defend Z-Bo’s flop. Although it was pretty depressing to hear them talk about the days of yore and how they were all excited for this new team coming in which never materialized.
I think they also said Nate McMillan instead of Rudy Fernandez one time. Right after talking about how he had 33 games in a row where he his a three pointer. Anyone else catch that?
by Liface on Apr 12, 2009 12:35 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
they sucked
They didn’t suck, but they were the equivalent of replacement-level announcers. They were professional and did a decent job.
They only seem good because Mike Rice is such an extreme embarrassment. Paul Allen really needs to step up and put Kevin Calabro and Marques Johnson back together again – bar none the BEST basketball announcing team of all-time.
M, period. Fresh, comma.
by manzell on Apr 12, 2009 6:34 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I hear these guys all the time
They’re great. Much better than the Laker Announcers, especially the dimwitted Stu Lance. It’s actually harder to be an announcer for a losing team. You have to find much more to talk about. These guys have long ago conceded that they’re going to have to focus on the visiting talent. The color guy really gives it up for opponents. Last night he forgot that he had seen that same insane curl play that Rudy alley-ooped to Aldridge. Here it is in December. Watch at 1:25. The color guy is floored by Rudy’s play. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QlAcm_hkaVI. The other guy, Lawler, is a smooth-talking classic announcer, but never gets over-hyped like Marv Albert or caught up in requisite idiot broadcaster sing-songy exits like Stu Lance.
(i get NBA package so I’ve seen quite a few of the opposing duos. I like Utah and Oklahoma City guys too. Walt Frazier, in NY, on the other hand, has an annoying style. )
by bbails on Apr 12, 2009 9:29 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Lakers have the best announcers in the NBA. Ralph Lawler is.............................. endearing.
Pontiff of the Pryz for Prez Posse...
by timbo on Apr 12, 2009 1:39 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I've always liked them.
They really do their homework…especially the color guy.
by raisedbed on Apr 11, 2009 11:44 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Yep, the color guy called Roy "the best closer in the game".
He said “Wade was the only one close but Brandon does it with such ease”. He also said something like “Roy has a wicked crossover and an uncanny ability to get his 6’6” body into the smallest of places". That is exactly what I’m always in awe over. What allows this is his amazing ball handling. I don’t think there is a player at his size with a better handle in the NBA.
One of the guys also mentioned that Roy has a 41" vertical but rarely uses it. And they asked “how deep are the Blazers … Frye and Bayless are not even playing!”
I don’t think Brandon is a secret any longer nor are the Blazers as a team for that matter. I hear recognition for them coming all the time now.
Brandon Roy just destroyed everything in his path. There's your rational analysis -- Dave
Also: COMCAST SUCKS!
by TwoDeep on Apr 12, 2009 6:12 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
One of the nice things about the Clipper guys
Is that they have loved the Blazers youth since ‘06, and the color commentator former-player guy was hyping Roy up even early on in Roy’s rookie year… he always loved him, which is cool.
I watch more Clipper fames than Laker games these days, and it’s funny how often they bring up the Blazers. They LOVE to talk about us. They’re pretty much more homery for the Blazers than the Mikes are!
Roy is an announcer’s favorite league wide though, you’re right. It’s cool to see MOST announcers actually paying attention to him, even if they’re just reading the same ol’ notes of “plays with such poise, always at his own pace”. I hate when announcers just read the same notes everyone gets, because it ain’t THAT hard to say sumthin’ new and nice about Roy since he does something new and nice every day.
The Clippers color guy has been saying Roy will be (and now is) one of the best players in the NBA, and would get gently chided for it by Lawler early on. He fell in love with him watching Roy at U of W.
Going to the Clipper game, it was like a home game during the 05-06 season… quiet crowd, most cheering for the Blazers but lotsa fans of the other team there. Listening to a Clippers vs Blazers game at home is like watching The Mikes, since they love us so much— probably even more gushy, since they gotta squeeze all of their gushing about the Blazers in 3 or 4 games, and the Mikes try “try” to not be so gushy even though they can’t help it.
Anytime a shot of the Western conference standings shows up, or talk of young teams comes up, the Clippers announcers go into a nice long schpeel about how great the Blazers are. It’s fun.
I hope Lawler gets to announce for a good Clippers team before he retires. Not that he is a great basketball mind, but he’s a classy dude that I always enjoy.
Mortimer
by Mortimer on Apr 13, 2009 11:19 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
the team gets a pass for this game
they have played so well recently (see: past 2 games) that they were due for an off night. Good news is that they found a way to win it, again…
by cloudydays on Apr 11, 2009 11:50 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Aldridge's Arm Sleeve
Anyone know what was up with Aldridge wearing an arm sleeve tonight? I noticed he wore one yesterday as well.
I thought McMillan discouraged wearing headbands and stuff like that?
by pcrackenhead on Apr 12, 2009 12:04 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
During a road game recently (sorry I can't remember which exact one it was)
he got fouled and fell on his arm. I believe the sleeve might be there for protection purposes, if not physically, at least mentally. Many athletes will wear sleeves and such over knees, elbows etc… even if they are not that sore because it gives them a sense of security.
I Blazersedge daily, nightly and ever so rightly.
by Claire on Apr 12, 2009 9:04 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
That makes sense, like how he had to wear the headband after he got konked in the noggin.
Must have missed where he fell on his arm, thanks!
by pcrackenhead on Apr 12, 2009 10:25 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
He allows stuff for medical reasons
That’s why LMA had a headband earlier in the year, because of his eardrum getting hurt.
Morty
by Mortimer on Apr 13, 2009 11:20 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I read the following and I was totally down/
Give me a funny girl with fantastic auburn hair and smart glasses with a Portland jersey on. Oh man.
Combined with the following
The cameras caught him afterwards giving us that little sexy-cool swag look coming back down the court. Priceless. Rudy may be officially back.
it makes me wonder how far your love of auburn hair goes?
Life is exhausting when you are this stupid.
by jonestr on Apr 12, 2009 12:10 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
how can you not have a crush on Tina Fey, I mean seriously.
Blazers win BDL 2 on 2 tournament!
Skeets: i’ll close it down now … congrats. you bastards
by 22baylor on Apr 12, 2009 1:43 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Has anyone found which playoff matchups Game 1's will be played on Sat vs Sun?
Or will it purely be determined by which teams are playing?
by Timmay! on Apr 12, 2009 12:15 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
not available until the matchups are set
Big bummer, too… I hope we play on Saturday to start it all off.
draft dejuan blair
by Cablinasian on Apr 12, 2009 12:21 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'm hoping Sunday
I have tickets to game 1, but no house-sitter Saturday (just found out today)
by Timmay! on Apr 12, 2009 12:28 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
This game
really demonstrated how potentially limited our first team is offensively and how we really need a reliable third scorer. Batum and Joel give us very little offense and if Blake is not on, we can be hard pressed to score. The start of the 1st and 3rd quarters tonight were downright ugly. I know we were flat after the big win against the Lakers, but still… Come playoffs, every team will just swarm Aldridge and Roy and take their chances with the other three. We won’t go far if we have to fight back from deficits every game.
by socalblazer on Apr 12, 2009 12:20 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
in comes webster...
next year
"There are a few teams you have to watch out for in the fourth quarter."
"Yeah, but Portland definitely is not one of them."
-New Orleans Hornets broadcasters at the end of the third quarter with the Hornets leading 74-59. Portland later ends up winning 97-89.
"They don't mind him shooting that shot at all. Rudy Fernandez is not that great of a 3pt shooter."
-New Orleans Hornets broadcasters right after a Rudy Fernandez missed 3pter. Rudy Fernandez finished the game with three 3pters on six attempts.
by Tofu Anonymous on Apr 12, 2009 1:38 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Personally
I do not want to face Dallas in the 1st round, they swept us this year because we have issues guarding talented fast paced offenses. I think a 1st round matchup with them would be fatal. I do believe we have a better shot in a series with SanAn or Houston.
"Intent is prior to content, the question is, does this generation really want truth?"
"Cogito ergo sum" -Descartes
by Shribby on Apr 12, 2009 12:28 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
with homecourt we'd handle them
the 3 games against them is way too small a sample size to judge from. Given their injuries, I’d rather play NO or SA, and I’d probobly rather play Utah also, but Houston is the team I’m really hoping to avoid. Dallas doesn’t worry me that much.
by jksnake99 on Apr 12, 2009 12:59 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Dallas is hot
and that bothers me. But we’re hot right now too. – Elgin
Blazers win BDL 2 on 2 tournament!
Skeets: i’ll close it down now … congrats. you bastards
by 22baylor on Apr 12, 2009 1:44 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Dallas in the first round would be a CATASTROPHE.
4th seed. We want 4th seed…
Pontiff of the Pryz for Prez Posse...
by timbo on Apr 12, 2009 1:47 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think we beat ourselves those games
LMA should be a perfect lanky and quick defender for Dirk, and our bench can match Terry’s production most nights.
I agree with Jake, our losses to the Mavs were more flukey with how good we are this year. Aside from Dirk, who is a matchup problem for anyone and I think we got a few nice answers for him (Batum would be good on him as well, if he isn’t needed for Kidd), there is no one we can’t handle.
We fell flat on X-Mas, lost to them on the road, and happened to lose again. I am confident in this team being able to cream the Mavs, despite the regular season. It’s not like the Rockets, who we barely beat once, who have premiere defenders to give Roy trouble, which gives our entire team trouble at this stage in everyone’s career.
Mavs, Hornets, a Spurs team WITHOUT a somewhat healthy Duncan, are all beatable by us. The Mavs don’t worry me just cause they beat us a few times this year. Hell, I like our chances against anyone really, since us stealing a win on the road is a lot easier than them stealing a win in the Rose Garden right now.
Mortimer
by Mortimer on Apr 13, 2009 11:26 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
i don't draw too many conclusions
from a low-energy, rather badly-played game with little ball movement — which, nevertheless, the blazers still won by 15 pts.
but then, i await the playoffs. that’s when a team’s weaknesses really get exposed — or overcome. we haven’t had the opportunity to see nate coach in the playoffs yet.
ignacio
by ignacio on Apr 12, 2009 12:36 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
I’d be happy with the four seed and a first-round matchup with the Spurs.
This is shaping up to be a terrific first round in the West, given how little really separates 2 through 8. No team dares look ahead to the next round, not with the Mavs, Jazz, and Hornets all lurking in the lower seeds.
by rivetz on Apr 12, 2009 12:49 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Jazz and Hornets are slumping.
Pontiff of the Pryz for Prez Posse...
by timbo on Apr 12, 2009 1:48 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'm kind of fustrated with Greg's defense right now
The offense is as good as I expected for his rookie year, and the rebounding is there. I really expected him to be a better defender this year though.
by jksnake99 on Apr 12, 2009 1:16 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Exactly my assesment of Greg.
He just does not appear to be a student of the game.
How do you work on your defense in the off-season?
Brandon Roy just destroyed everything in his path. There's your rational analysis -- Dave
Also: COMCAST SUCKS!
by TwoDeep on Apr 12, 2009 6:17 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
film and coaching
Blazers win BDL 2 on 2 tournament!
Skeets: i’ll close it down now … congrats. you bastards
by 22baylor on Apr 12, 2009 1:44 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
He looked tired during stretches last night
Part of the problem, though, was when he played next to Trout at PF. That is a terrible combo against a decent rebounding frontline on the other side. Oden’s a good rebounder and defender but his mobility is low – you need to pair him with a PF who brings SOMETHING to the table on the glass on on help D. Trout, um, does not. When he plays PF, he’s possibly the worst defending/rebounding four in the league. And it may not be close.
Q: Is Greg favoring his knee?
Frye: He favors dunking on your head, that's what he favors.
by KP Corleone on Apr 12, 2009 1:09 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Trout's shortcomings are well documented
What’s frustrating is that Greg was projected to be the type of guy that lets you get away with playing weak defenders at other positions. The fact that he’s not really compensating for other players on D— and indeed has defensive problems of his own— is disappointing, if only because he was such a hyped #1 pick. Greg’s helped the team a lot this year but he’s not the game changer on D I’d hoped for.
by jksnake99 on Apr 12, 2009 5:11 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
His reaction time is really slow. I'm not sure if this is something that will come with more game experience or if it's just the way his body is hooked up to his brain.
Pontiff of the Pryz for Prez Posse...
by timbo on Apr 12, 2009 1:43 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Just got home from the game...
was at Staples Center tonight for the game! This game reminded me of the office, late on a Friday afternoon, before everyone is taking a week of vacation. There was no energy in the game tonight. It’s not that Portland looked tired, they just didn’t care – they knew they could win if they turned it on for a couple of minutes at the end and that’s what they did.
They turned up the pressure for the last 3 minutes of the first half and the last 6 minutes of the game and pulled away during both of those time periods. They played okay in stretches, but this was a team ready to move on to the post season or at least to a more important game.
They did a good job keeping the tempo of the game down as the Clips tend to win higher scoring games. The only bummer was that with the game close the starters played a lot of minutes but they sure didn’t play hard during those minutes. They were definitely going through the motions and still had no trouble putting the Clippers away – solid win on a night when no one wanted to be there.
Saw a lot of Blazer fans – we came close to outnumbering them!!
by mwalter on Apr 12, 2009 1:36 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
The Mikes were talking about the number of Blazer fans
I don’t know, every two or three seconds it seemed…
Proud member of Duck nation!
by skywaker9 on Apr 12, 2009 1:49 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
There seem to be a lot of folks who don't approve of the L*kers, even in L.A.
Perhaps they see Portland as the best hope to put the L*kers in their proper place.
by jaywalker on Apr 12, 2009 11:55 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
1 foul from Greg in 17 minutes. I like that he went for the blocks and didn't foul.
He is learning. I hope he had just an off night on the glass though. This is the one time his play really hurt the Blazers. Joel had to step in and grab those boards.
by BRoyInThe4th on Apr 12, 2009 1:47 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Greg and rebounding...
sometimes it seems like he’s just not aggressive enough in rebounding with authority. When Joel pulls down the boards there’s no doubt who it belongs to, while at times Greg looks like he’s deferring to everyone else. There were several boards tonight that Greg had his hands on and someone else took it away. Authority is the word that comes to mind – he’s got to take it like it’s his and leave no doubt
by mwalter on Apr 12, 2009 1:51 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Negativity and negativity
Travis OUtlaw is the man… I don’t care what anyone says… I’m drunk right now, but travis outlaw is the shiznit. I don’t care what you say… One game is not going to change that. LMA has had some cold nights in a row too and I don’t see many fans jumping his ship…
I heart you TROUT
by two buck chuck on Apr 12, 2009 4:15 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Sober up
Travis played terrible the past two games. I like what he gives the Blazers when he’s playing well, don’t get me wrong, but when he’s bad, he’s hold-your-nose stinking bad.
Trout should never, ever play PF against a good rebounding PF on the other side. The Blazers get killed every time Nate tries that. Travis is not a good rebounder even for a SF. You might as well just not guard Lamar Odom if you’re going to have Travis Outlaw trying to box him out. It’s man vs. child.
Speaking of which, there are much worse ways to spend $8 mil in cap space than bringing Odom in…
Q: Is Greg favoring his knee?
Frye: He favors dunking on your head, that's what he favors.
by KP Corleone on Apr 12, 2009 1:02 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Hoping for a Denver win?
It’s a little strange to think this way, but I really would like a San Antonio match in the first round more than I do the ones that come with the 3rd seed. If Denver wins Monday, the game on Wednesday will have no playoff implications for them. Perhaps Karl will rest some of his players.
by grigs on Apr 12, 2009 7:41 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
I believe it could still have implications for Denver, sadly.
If Houston wins out (very likely), then denver comes into that game 1 game up on us and Houston. If we beat them, sure, they beat us in the tie breaker, BUT Houston will be Division champ as well, and since Denver loses to us, the will have the same record as Houston—and Houston owns the season series 3-1. So, Denver could very well be playing for the #2 seed, which they will want very very badly, as it gives them home court advantage in the second round.
Someone tell me if I’m wrong. It’s crazy to think we could very likely end up with a 4 way tie for 2nd place in the conference—talk about close. For that to happen Spurs, Blazers and Houston have to win out (totally possible) and Denver just loses to us on the last day.
"We have a different style, a European style," he says adjusting his jacket for emphasis. "They know it's cool.''
by sergioFTW on Apr 12, 2009 7:49 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Good points
Hadn’t thought about Houston and Denver for the 2nd spot. The 4-way tie is a crazy scenario. Any idea how the seeding breaks down in that case?
by grigs on Apr 12, 2009 8:01 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
in 4 way tie scenario as described above, it would go
2. Houston
3. Denver
4. Portland
5. San Antonio
at least that how i think it would go. which I think is the best possible seeding for the Blazers to get out of the 1st round. Bu the Nuggets aren’t going to give us that last game, it’s gonna be a battle, probably the biggest of the season, with both teams playing for home court advantage (us in the 1st, them in the 2nd). Of course if San Antonio drops a game, and we beat the Thunder, then we have almost no incentive to win against Denver, as far as seeding goes.
"We have a different style, a European style," he says adjusting his jacket for emphasis. "They know it's cool.''
by sergioFTW on Apr 12, 2009 8:21 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Did you choose that photo of Sergio because of Easter?
by tominhawaii on Apr 12, 2009 7:46 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
no doubt
"We have a different style, a European style," he says adjusting his jacket for emphasis. "They know it's cool.''
by sergioFTW on Apr 12, 2009 7:50 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I might have chosen a photo of Sergio getting that ridiculous offensive foul call
when trying to call a timeout for his Jesus-on-the-Cross moment, but Dave smartly when with the more literal photo.
"We have a different style, a European style," he says adjusting his jacket for emphasis. "They know it's cool.''
by sergioFTW on Apr 12, 2009 7:51 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I have to say, this was one of the ugliest games I have ever seen.
Regardless, we won. And even if it was an ugly win, a win is a win and it still counts the same.
I Blazersedge daily, nightly and ever so rightly.
by Claire on Apr 12, 2009 9:12 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
We seem to play ugly against the Clippers
I remember the game down here LAST season, where Roy was out, and we only beat the Clippers because Jack had an above average game. It was the worst win I can ever remember.
This 15 point win was ugly, but had some beautiful moments… break away dunks, Roy dunked twice, the Rudy to LMA oops, the Oden rebound dunk… last year, it was a game NO ONE wanted to win.
Mortimer
by Mortimer on Apr 13, 2009 11:30 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Doesn't Utah have the tie breaker with Dallas as well?
They split the season series and Utah has a better conference record.
by trailblazersfan on Apr 12, 2009 9:14 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
I think that Utah still has a shot at the six seed. If they win their final two games, Dallas loses their final three games, and New Orleans only wins their Dallas game, then you’d have Utah/NO at 49-33, and Dallas at 48-34, with Utah owning the tiebreaker against NO (assuming Dave is correct re: tiebreakers). If Utah also owns the tiebreaker vs Dallas (as trailblazersfan sez), then Utah would get the #6 seed if both NO & Dallas lose the two games where they don’t face each other.
MLB2PDX!!! (someday...)
by The Cactus Leaguer on Apr 12, 2009 11:14 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
2 thoughts
1. blake is not the answer at the point and
2. CHECK OUT http://www.nba.com/2009/news/features/dave_mcmenamin/04/08/rookie.rankings/index.html
sadly nothing about our rookies but the video shows their picks for coach of the year.
by philthebballplayer on Apr 12, 2009 11:11 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
One cool stat
I thought I heard the announcers (by the way, those guys seemed to LOVE the Blazers) say that Rudy needed to hit 10 three point shots to tie the all time record for 3’s made in a rookie year. He went on to hit 2 in the game, so now needs 8 in the next two games to tie. Go Rudy!!!!!
"I don't play for what they write about me, I play for my teammates, my coaches, the city of Portland." - Steve Blake
by RudyisSick! on Apr 12, 2009 5:21 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I see a lot of griping, but I thought it was a good win...classic let-down game and they pulled through
Anything else is just nitpicking imo
Blazer Fan
by leeroyjenkins on Apr 12, 2009 11:16 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Remember Barrett's pre-season blog?
I can’t find it now, but I recall him claiming that by the end of the season the Blazers they thought internally that our team would be the fourth best in the league. It seemed pretty surreal at the time.
Fast forward to today. Unless I did the math wrong, the 10 best records since the all-star break are:
1. Cleveland, 24-4
2. L*kers, 21-7
3. Houston, 20-7
4. Portland, 20-8
5. Orlando, 20-9
6. New Orleans, 18-11
7. Dallas, 17-10
7. Denver, 17-10
7. Utah, 17-10
10. Phoenix, 16-13
That’s just eerie.
by jaywalker on Apr 12, 2009 12:05 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Nice one
Of course with such a small sample size these schedules would not be balanced re quality of opponent, amount of road games etc… still impressive though!
Key thing, we have momentum, confidence are relatively healthy and a bright future regardless of how the playoffs go. Our incredible consistency in terms of winning percentage throughout the year just indicates that we are the real deal!
Let’s have some fun in the playoffs! KP and company can adjust once we see how this all pans out
by QuebecBlzrFan on Apr 12, 2009 12:44 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I just watched the game
It was boring. That Sergio → Rudy → LA play was sweet. The Gordon dunk was cool.
by tominhawaii on Apr 12, 2009 1:44 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
It was unjust that Sergio didn't also get an assist on that.
Pontiff of the Pryz for Prez Posse...
by timbo on Apr 12, 2009 1:51 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Good news
New Orleans beat Dallas, giving them a game lead and the head to head tiebreaker. They are probably the division champ. They have a magic number of one for the sixth seed over Dallas.
If they beat San Antonio on Wednesday (b2b for SA), that would give us an awesome opportunity at the third seed and a NO matchup.
draft dejuan blair
by Cablinasian on Apr 12, 2009 2:59 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
General question
what is the best website to use to compare player stats? I have a bet with a friend and need to do some research.
"I don't play for what they write about me, I play for my teammates, my coaches, the city of Portland." - Steve Blake
by RudyisSick! on Apr 12, 2009 5:13 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
basketball-reference.com
is by far the best for traditional, box score stats, althoughthey have some extras like PER and eFG and the like.
For +/- and some more esoteric stats, 82games.com is great.
If you really want to mess around with adjusted +/-, basketballvalue.com is good for that.
And, KP2’s site (basketballprospectus.com) has some strange stats on there also.
by Royster on Apr 12, 2009 6:53 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I 2nd basketball-reference.com
its got traditional stats as well as some of the more generally accepted advanced stats.
by jksnake99 on Apr 12, 2009 7:42 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Mortimer!
where’s the Media Row Report?!
We’re waiting
by Section323 on Apr 12, 2009 5:40 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
I really wanted to do a nice write up
But I got food poisoning, and it was purty rough.
There was no way I’d miss the game with the seats I had, though. It was also supposed to be a Blazer game first, then bachelor party after that, but I canceled that because I felt like crap sticks.
Some off the top o’ the head notes:
—Baron came running out of the tunnel a few minutes after the other Clippers, and from how he played and looked I think he was eating a big plate of cheesy saucy meaty lasagna. He looked and played heavy.
—DeAndre Jordan was the player they chose to grace the face of my ticket. …why?
—Z-Bo and Nate and Z-Bo and Joel were pretty chummy together.
—A drunk dude behind me was ragging on Oden all night, AND every single Clipper player. “Hey Oden… you’re garbage! Hey Oden… you’re junk!”. It’s all he could think up.
—Fred Jones shot is still broke.
—Brian Skinner is taller than I expected, since I had him classified as an undersized PF. He took more shots than he should have and was pretty bad, I thought.
—Not Z-Bo bad, but Brian Skinner bad (and to think he was like a savior back when we had no center aside from Ha Seung-Jinn, just by being serviceable, which he still is).
—Everyone around me was a Blazer fan, for the most part. I admire Clipper fans though… the way I see it, if you’re from LA, it’s more than okay to like the Lakers. They’re your team! So to be from LA, when it is totally okay to be a Laker fan, and choose to push the incredibly successful and popular Lakers to the side for the perennial loser Clippers… that’s a special sort of person high of character. Hey, I hate the Lakers, but if I was born in the LA area and was a basketball fan (which I am), how would I not grow up as a Laker fan? It’s like someone just happening to be born in Germany, so he became a Nazi. It’s just what you do.
—One thing I didn’t like about the Clipper fans that night, was when Oden stepped on a foot and limped for a few times up and down the court, people were laughing like it was hysterical. I just put my program over my face and hoped for the best.
—Which, of course, made me think… Rudy comes up limping like that every other play. We see it and go “oh he’ll be fine”. Oden comes up limping in a very normal sort of play, and our heart sinks and we think up the worst case scenarios and next day headlines. I’m as bad as anyone.
—Speaking of Oden, this was one of those games where he just didn’t have the energy he does some nights. My fitness expert friend who came to the game with me thinks it’s the season long grind combined with the year off and the stop and go season he had with the ankle and knee, and I tend to agree with it. It’s a long season even for someone not coming off of a year off, and with no real injuries, so some days Oden looks like Oden and other days he looks tired. His legs were heavy this game.
—EVERYONE’s legs were heavy this game, though Rudy had some mojo going. LMA shoulda’ had a monster game, and Roy wasn’t really trying for the most part… as much as Roy doesn’t try, I mean. He wasn’t being like Baron Davis or something.
—The Staples Center really sucks for watching games, I say. You can’t find any relevant stats anywhere, the jumbotron is smaller than the TV I’m gonna buy after the wedding, and so pixelly it’s like you’re watching a Real Player video from 1998. Not a very cool game experience, especially compared to the Rose Garden and because it’s LA and all… you’d think they could afford to do better.
—I just don’t know how Clipper fans do it. Yeah, we had our dark years there, but because of our history you felt like we were only a few moves away back to goodness. What kind of faith can the Clipper fans have in Sterling and Dunleavy, and their scouting departments? Sterling is cheap as hell except when he isn’t, and when he isn’t he’s spending money stupidly. Dunleavy should just be a coach, not GM as well. Ya got a guy with a ton of potential in DeAndre, but a kid known for laziness and effort problems shouldn’t be around Baron Davis and Ricky Davis and Z-Bo (off the court at least). They gotta do so many moves to get rid of the guys they just got, and it just sucks to see since Clipper fans are (obviously) some of the most faithful fans in the world.
—Even with everyone healthy, the pieces just don’t fit. If Eric Gordon could play PG, I’d be more excited, since I’m not a fan of short 2-guards who can score but can’t guard either position. He’s always going to be a great scorer though, and he’s more athletic than, say, Ben Gordon, and a better ballhandler as well. He’s a nice piece who should be scoring 20+ for years.
—They need a New Jack KP/Presti/Houston’s GM type GM. Fresh blood, not a Rick Sund type.
—As soon as we started going on a little run with 5 minutes left (or so) after being tied in the 4th, the Clipper fans just started heading to the exit. They’d seen this episode before.
Mortimer
by Mortimer on Apr 13, 2009 11:57 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Just got done watching the game
Looks like I didn’t miss a whole lot as far as listening vs. watching, although the Oden putback dunk and the Rudy to LA dunk+1 were amazing to watch.
Blazers win!
by The X-man on Apr 12, 2009 8:48 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs

by 






















