Game 60 Recap: Blazers 107, Pacers 105
General Observations
That game was quite interesting. Though that adjective could be taken positively or negatively. It was an exciting game. Perhaps it shouldn't have been.
The Blazers came out flatter than buffet-line prime rib. They were slow, lacking energy, and seemingly intent on winning the game with offense. The problem was their offense, with isolated exceptions, consisted of jumpers and/or weak one-on-one moves. Meanwhile the Pacers, themselves masters of the offense-only win, showed us how it was done. Them hitting shots off of passes wasn't disappointing. That's what they do. But the number of times they scored in the lane was painful and the number of times they grabbed offensive rebounds was flabbergasting. The Pacers just don't get that many offensive boards. The Blazers forced their center to commit helping on defense and then failed utterly to cover the rebound from ancillary positions. Three Pacers got 3 offensive boards and two more grabbed a pair. Meanwhile nobody was stopping T.J. Ford or Jarrett Jack and we managed to make Marquis Daniels look like the player the Pacers wanted instead of the player the Pacers got. The opening period ended with Indiana up 26-20 but most of those Portland points came in a late-quarter flurry. The quarter was worse than the score indicated.
In the second quarter at least we got our offense going to the tune of 32 points. We remembered that the Pacers defend like...the Pacers and we got the ball inside and drew fouls. Lamarcus Aldridge and Travis Outlaw were a big part of the scoring. We also did a better job of closing out the lane against penetration, unfortunately at the expense of leaving the perimeter wide open. I haven't seen that much swishing since my last trip to Darcelle XV. (You go, girl! Work those hips!) The Pacers happily scored 33 and walked away with a 7-point halftime lead.
I'd love to be able to tell you that Portland came out fired up in the third quarter and took the game away but other than a turnover-plagued stretch for Indiana midway through the quarter each team basically had their way with each other. Layups, jumpers, free throws, threes...we got a little of everything, including those offensive rebounds. Every time the Blazers would come close Indiana would pull away again. The net result was a 27-26 quarter, an 8-point lead for the Pacers entering the final period, and a lot of nervous Blazer fans.
In the fourth quarter the Blazers finally came out ready to play. Brandon Roy picked up a microphone and said, "I'm glad you've had fun, but I told you play time was over a quarter and a half ago. You didn't listen. Now it's time for your spanking." Well, I suppose he didn't really say that but he might as well have. He called his own number left and right and connected almost every time he did. Equal credit goes to Steve Blake and Lamarcus Aldridge, though. In case you couldn't tell, up until this point the Blazers weren't having a good defensive game...not even (and maybe especially) Brandon. Steve Blake finally manned up and stayed in front of Jarrett Jack and Lamarcus played the Blazer Center role in the smaller lineup to the hilt. It seemed like he was all over the floor helping and recovering. He really looked magnificent.
Still the game came down to an inbounds play with 18 seconds left and the Blazers up by two. Portland got it to Rudy in the backcourt, which was the correct call since Indiana had to foul or the game was over. But the Pacers trapped Rudy and he picked up his dribble. Steve Blake ran back to help out but he got the pass right near the precarious halfcourt line area with a defender right behind him. With the rushed pass and the unfortunate positioning Blake never handled the ball and Marquis "You AGAIN?" Daniels stole it and went in for an unopposed dunk and the tie. Blazer ball, 11 seconds left.
Everybody and their uncle (and their uncle's coach and his agent and his agent's cat) knew who the ball was going to in that situation and indeed Roy got it and camped at the top of the arc, letting the clock run down. Roy made his move and juked the defender, leaning into an amazing shot to win the game. Well, OK, that's what SHOULD have happened. Instead Roy only semi-juked his defender, ending up cutting diagonally across the lane at an awkward angle with T.J. Ford on him. Ford gave him what looked on the big-screen replay to be a small hip bump. Roy fell to the ground. Tweet! Two free throws later Portland is up 2 with 1.7 seconds left. Don't say we never get any questionable calls.
Timeout, yadda...yadda...who else but Jarrett Jack gets the ball? He caught it, faked it, let the defender sail by, and ended up with an open-but-rushed look at a three to win it. Such drama! Such destiny! Such a pity it went wide right. Blazers escape with a win, 107-105.
The Blazers let the Pacers shoot almost 52% while getting up 83 shots, which normally is a recipe for disaster. Indiana hit 5 more field goals and 3 more three-pointers than the Blazers. Indiana outrebounded the Blazers. Indiana had 16 assists to Portland's 13, which not only indicates that the Blazers weren't passing the ball but that Portland was making the Pacers look like great one-on-one players, which they pretty much aren't. Indiana had 9 steals to Portland's 5, 7 blocks to Portland's 4. So how the heck did the Blazers win this game? The little sugar plum fairies in grey. The Blazers shot 84.4% to Indiana's 75% from the charity stripe. Oh, and Portland had 32 free throw attempts to Indiana's 16. It's somewhat unusual for the Blazers to win that way, but there you go.
Individual Observations
Being live made it harder to keep good individual notes as I wasn't writing things down all game. Although I always include stats in these I never like to do them solely from the stats because they're often misleading. So the following will have to suffice:
--Roy, Aldridge, and Outlaw had great offensive games (28, 21, and 21) and Lamarcus had that good defensive stand as well. Outlaw softened the Pacers up before Roy finished them.
--Joel Przybilla had another good rebounding night (12) but I felt sorry for how exposed his teammates left him after he worked so hard covering for them. The hardest of the hard hats this year belong to the centers.
--It was not a good night for point guards. Not only did they make T.J. Ford and Jarrett Jack look amazing instead of vulnerable not a one of them could hit a shot. Blake's main contribution was hitting the three that finally put the Blazers ahead. Bayless had a couple of nice defensive stands but otherwise didn't have a remarkable evening in his 13 minutes. Sergio got 5 minutes.
--Rudy had a couple of memorable passes. They're incredibly fun to watch live when you can see the whole play develop at once.
Final Thoughts
It's not surprising the Blazers struggled through this game after Sunday's masterpiece. I just wish they wouldn't depend on the fourth quarter so heavily. That's walking a pretty thin line. Tonight's performance probably means that they will either recover and play another excellent game in Denver or that they'll continue downward and flop entirely. It's Blazersedge Night. I'm rooting for the former.
Check out the Indiana view at IndyCornrows.
Have fun with tomorrow's Jersey Contest form here. I just realized I left town without the contest administrator's site in hand so forgive me if the scores are slow in posting.
--Dave (blazersub@yahoo.com)
61 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Brandon decided he was going to win the game
There was nothing the Pacers could do to stop him from doing it.
Karma
Except, you know, they didn't foul him
But, we’ll just ignore that since it benefited Portland ;)
Confusion breeds success. If they don't know each other, opponents can't have strategy. GENIUS.
by Ozzie Montana on Mar 5, 2009 12:26 AM PST up reply actions
Jarrett Jack said afterwards
that when they saw it on film, it was the right call.
When I rule the world, everyone will know how to use Excel.
It was a borderline call
TJ hip checked Roy on the drive – he wouldn’t have gone down if he hadn’t been bumped. Too bad for Indy they were in the penalty.
He scored 24 points in the second half and 13 in the fourth quarter
The only way they could stop him was to foul and he went 8/8 on free throws.
Karma
Roy was magnificant! How good is he?!!!
The things that he does on a consistent basis simply flabbergast me. Truly he’s a very special player.
I hear him being referred to as top 10 in the league. He’s better than that.
We simply have to gain the playoffs if for no other reason than to put Brandon on display to the NBA world of fans.
Brandon Roy just destroyed everything in his path. There's your rational analysis -- Dave
Also: COMCAST SUCKS!
I'm really glad we pulled out this W.
We now are 4.5 games up on PHX.
Unfortunately, because our guys logged major minutes (42 and 38 for Roy and Aldridge, respectively), our chances for tomorrow went from about 20% to about 10%.
If the guys have been saving a big road performance in their back pocket all season, now would be an awfully good time to use it.
Boomshakalaka
What % would you have given the Pacers to win this game? They were on a back to back.
I don’t think being on a back to back will affect the Blazers as much as you think.
Karma
by Sabonis4Ever on Mar 5, 2009 12:04 AM PST up reply actions
yeah, I guess you are right
I should give us a better chance to beat Denver than the Pacers to beat us (they only have 8 road wins). I probobly would have given Indy a 10% chance, so I should probobly give us a 20% chance. Still going to be tough though.
Boomshakalaka
A back to back in Denver is harder
because of the altitude. You are already tired, and less oxygen saps your energy.
I’d still call it about 20%, because there are so many things that can happen. Last year, if I remember right, we went in there basically doomed (LMA was out) and Channing went crazy on them. All it takes is one guy having an insane night and everyone gets a lift, and suddenly the fatigue doesn’t matter so much. Or they have somebody key who gets the flu, or something.
But it will be harder because guys had to play long minutes, no question.
When I rule the world, everyone will know how to use Excel.
I remember that!
Channing dropped like 15 in the first half or something and we blew them out. That rocked.
Boomshakalaka
TJ Ford
I hope this guy has finally put his health issues behind him, he is incredibly fun to watch. While I would have liked a convincing win that allowed us to rest some starters in preparation for Denver, any win is a good win
An admission: After the OKC game, I said some things. Stupid things. Things about Nate not knowing how to coach GO. It was only then I realized that I was in danger of becoming that which I most loathe - an uninformed, knee jerk fan who reacts to wins with wild delusions of championships and losses with trade and firing fodder. I will not be that fan. From this point on I will support the Blazers, the coaches and front office wholeheartedly, offering praise and criticism appropriate to the matter at hand. I will never again be "that guy".
Blazeraddict
2/9/2009
I went to a game
against toronto the last year we had zach and tj ford beat us by himself and it was the same story. we had jarret jack on the time, but nobody could stay in front of him. against the right team, he can be deadly when healthy
I am starting the coalition to BRING BACK IKE.
no need to worry about our starters getting major minutes.
Ruffin, Shav, and Sergio should be ready to lead the charge.
Up 1 with 1.7 seconds left, why didn´t Roy intentionally miss his free throw?
I think a missed shot gave them a better chance in defense than a time out, because there wasn´t time enough for a rebound (probably contested), a good pass and a good shot.
Sergio + Rudy = 16
Sergio + Bayless = 16
Batum 8+8=16
s'truth
in that situation, with that time, it was almost certainly going to be a three, so it didn’t matter if the Blazers were up one or two. So missing it intentionally after a first make is actually a pretty smart strategy. Nice!
If they had a timeout
then all the pacers had to do was grab the rebound and call timeout. And since the clock doesn’t start until someone touches the ball, only tenths of a second will be used. Timeout advances the ball to half court and they only need a two to win the game.
Right
1.7 seconds is too much time left for that strategy. Less than a second, you miss. They would have at least 1.3 seconds, and you have to defend the whole court.
The other problem is that fouls happen, and if you inadvertently foul, you don’t want to lose just because your guy intentionally missed a free throw. So the intentional miss is dangerous, and you don’t want to do it unless it really does run them out of time completely.
When I rule the world, everyone will know how to use Excel.
Besides, how many times in that situation
have you seen the player try to miss and it still goes in? Didn’t Blake do just that a few games ago?
they had a timeout
I’d rather be ahead by 2 with 1.7 seconds left than up by 1 with 1.2 seconds left (assuming it would take them .5 seconds to rebound and call time).
If they hadn’t had a timeout, then missing the FT is the way to go.
Boomshakalaka
also -- if we fouled their 3pt shot
better to be up 2 than 1 if putting their guy on the line to shoot 3.
ignacio
Replay was clear - Brandon was fouled
Ford clearly hit him, and rightfully was called for the foul. Just because it isn’t usually called doesn’t mean it wasn’t right. We’ve all seen Brandon get bodied up on a regular basis without penalty on the defender. When it went back to replay, it was easy to see it was no different than any other shove, other than Ford didn’t use his hands.
Key to the W and our future success in the playoffs
Improved FT defense. Way to go, team.
When I rule the world, everyone will know how to use Excel.
The biggest thing IMHO
Free throws. To quote Shoz – “You gotta make your free throws.” Tonight, the Blazers shot over 80% from the charity stripe and they won. If they had had a sub-par free-throw percentage (like they’ve had in several games) they would have lost.
What is ‘Improved FT defense’ BTW?
LOL
People have been talking about how teams always shoot FTs so well against us, far better than the league average. In this game, they didn’t. Our FT defense was improved.
How does a team play better FT defense? You tell me, and I’ll become a very rich NBA consultant. But however we did it, we did it.
When I rule the world, everyone will know how to use Excel.
Someone on here postulated something interesting...
I can’t remember who said it, but the basic idea is that Portland doesn’t make you work hard on offense as most of the team (other than Przy) is soft. That means Portland’s opponents are fairly well rested when they get to a line. You have to figure that fatigue is a big factor in free throw shooting and so is how you got fouled. If Shaq flattens you or Reggie Evans gives you the Przy special (two eggs over easy), you’re going to have a tough time at the line.
Watch the fouls called on Portland. Most of them are hand checks or other soft fouls.
Rudy had a really nice game
His stats for this game don’t look that impressive, but Rudy’s passing set up a lot of good plays. He got credit for 4 assists, but he also helped create a bunch of other opportunities where he didn’t get an assist.
He played some pretty good defense down the stretch too. In the 4th quarter the Pacers were alternating between running iso plays for Jack (who was guarded by Rudy) and TJ Ford (who was guarded by Blake). On most of the Jack isos, Jarrett would end up spending about half the time on the shot clock trying to get past Rudy without getting a good shot before giving up and handing the ball over to TJ Ford.
Batum also made a bunch of nice hustle plays that don’t show up in the box score (as usual). It seems like Rudy and Nic are both better than their stats indicate, which is something that is unusual for a rookie.
Rudy cementing his place as the best passer on the team
"Sergio and I obtained chalupas to understand their power. Then Sergio showed that each one has 427 calories and 27 grams of fat. Leaping upwards, we reviled the accursed chalupa and its pressure. – Rudy Fernandez
by LetsBlaze on Mar 5, 2009 4:45 AM PST up reply actions 1 recs
i don't think we should take for granted travis going off for 17 in the first half
brandon was only 2-6 at and lamarcus had bad shooting numbers as well. blake hadnt hit a single shot.
having the capacity to come in and just “go off” like that, unguardably, well… it’s nice to have someone like that around.
ignacio
Yes
Travis was the only thing that kept us from getting buried in the first half.
"I saw him in the face" Sergio's quote on the latest alley-oop to Rudy.
by blazermaniac32 on Mar 5, 2009 6:56 AM PST up reply actions
Definitely.
…… and par for the course, he hit a big shot at the end too.
Brandon Roy just destroyed everything in his path. There's your rational analysis -- Dave
Also: COMCAST SUCKS!
And Ben's picture shows
How amazing it was that he didn’t foul Jack on that last play. Kind of turned his body in mid-air to avoid the collision. Whew!
"I saw him in the face" Sergio's quote on the latest alley-oop to Rudy.
by blazermaniac32 on Mar 5, 2009 10:13 AM PST up reply actions
I had the same thought at the time:
“Where would the Blazers be in this game without Trout?”
"We don't back down to nobody." --Joel Przybilla
As Roy said in his post game interview ....
that was a good team we played. We did well to come away victorious with them playing at the level they were last night. It was a terrific, exciting win.
Why did Dallas ever get rid of Marquis Daniels?! He’s pretty good. And he looked pretty good too when he was with the Mavericks. I believe they thought they already had his position covered making him expendable. Bad mistake me thinks.
Brandon Roy just destroyed everything in his path. There's your rational analysis -- Dave
Also: COMCAST SUCKS!
B-Roy's "defense"
In case you couldn’t tell, up until this point the Blazers weren’t having a good defensive game…not even (and maybe especially) Brandon.
Understatement of the month.
I love Roy, but wow, he was atrocious on D last night. Marquis Daniels has never looked so competent. I won’t say good, because most of his points looked like an average high school bball player could’ve scored them. Three or four dribbles from the foul line followed by a stop, then an awkward but virtually uncontested layup with little to no elevation. Uggggglly. Very, very ugly.
I saw three or four of these before finally starting to rewind the DVR to see who was allowing these pathetic “drives” to happen. Had to be Travis, right? Maybe Blake, or young Nic? No, no, and no. Much to my dismay, it was Brandon every time.
Imagine working at a family convenience store, and checking the surveillance camera to see who stole money from the counter, and turns out it’s your mom. That’s what it felt like.
(It wasn’t quite this dramatic, but Lebron suffered from the same lack of committment to D up until this year. Most of the great ones don’t start giving equal effort on that end until probably year four or five. Hopefully Brandon follows the same pattern.)
Q: Is Greg favoring his knee?
Frye: He favors dunking on your head, that's what he favors.
Remind me not to hire your mom
:-P
Yeah, I was very disappointed with Brandon’s D tonight. I hope Joel or Steve called him on it during or after the game.
I saw Joel getting in his ear
during the game….it might have been re this issue….Joel don’t like that crap
"You're welcome friend
I love you."
- Tom "Dragline" inHawaii
by 92wastheyear on Mar 5, 2009 11:52 AM PST up reply actions
It's too bad Joel
is the only one willing to call out his teammates, but maybe he’s the only one who actually knows how to play defense.
Well...
I haven’t seen that much swishing since my last trip to Darcelle XV. (You go, girl! Work those hips!)
We learn something new about Dave on a regular basis, don’t we?
Dave – I’m looking forward to you describing an opposing team in a post-game write-up as “attacking the basket like a bunch of angry drag queens.” (cue Buddy Cole monologue).
Wow.
Never thought I’d see a Darcelle’s reference on BE. I have now seen it all.
"Respect everyone, fear no one." -TP
Was the inbounds to Rudy really the right play?
Travis was wide open near-ish the basket.
I know we’d rather see Rudy at the line, but the desperation inbounds heave across half court looked like a recipe for disaster, and boy, the outcome sure came close to one. And they chose not to foul Rudy anyway.
Given our propensity to not get the ball in at all on the inbounds play, I’d rather see that go to Travis. But I guess it all worked out okay in the end.
I hated that 2nd pass though
Rudy just needed to wrap up the freakin’ ball and let them foul you…..why try to work the ball at all…am I missing somethin’?
"You're welcome friend
I love you."
- Tom "Dragline" inHawaii
by 92wastheyear on Mar 5, 2009 11:53 AM PST up reply actions
The Pacers would have fouled once the Blazers got past half court
They were trying to trap them in the back court to get a 8 second call. Rudy should not have picked up his dribble and Blake should have not lost his dribble. Just very bad execution. Passing into Rudy was safer, Blake just blew it.
Karma
How was Portland able to keep Tony Parker in check
on Sunday, but not Ford and Jack last night? What was the difference? Portland has trouble with quick players (Parker, Ford, Jack, Brooks, etc.) because its guards are slow yet Parker was fairly ordinary the last time they met up.
Roy gets a lot of love for his contributions on offense, but he needs to put more effort in on the defensive end. As KP Corleone pointed out above, Daniels had too many free trips down the middle. That ole defense puts a lot of pressure on the center and he has to back off to avoid the foul.
I know there are a lot of Bayless supporters here, but I just don’t see great defense from him. It didn’t seem to matter who was guarding Ford or Jack as they got nearly every shot off uncontested.
So why couldn't Portland game plan for Jack and Ford?
Daniels was a bit of a surprise so they’re off the hook for him, but Jack has been playing well for a couple of weeks now and Ford is a known quantity as well.
Disagree about Bayless
I think Bayless brings a decidedly different attitude. I don’t remember any free looks for those guys while he was in. And if they did get them, it was Bayless getting separated for a few seconds off a screen.
Bayless looks tougher and more focused on D than the Blazers other perimeter defenders. He’s still learning about switches, picks, and rotations, but his on ball D is already close to the best on the team. Nic has the stopper rep, but he’s not strong enough yet to really keep guys away from the rack.
Q: Is Greg favoring his knee?
Frye: He favors dunking on your head, that's what he favors.
It's all relative.
Bayless looks tougher and more focused on D than the Blazers other perimeter defenders.
It’s not hard to be a better perimeter defender than most of Portland’s guards. It’s frustrating to watch, time and time again, dudes get to the rim without too much resistance.
Bayless gets credit for effort and does a pretty good job of staying in front of his man, but I haven’t seen him lock down anyone yet. Of course, it’s just his first year in the NBA and he does seem to have the tools.
It seemed like part of the reason why Portland was able to contain Parker was because SA didn't use him as much
The first time we played the Spurs, they ran a lot of plays for Parker because they didn’t have anyone else who could score a lot of points. In the second game Duncan was back so they started running plays for Duncan instead of Parker.
Good point.
I guess that’s a frowny face for Popovich for not realizing that Portland can’t guard quick dudes.
Indiana didn’t have much choice since Granger and Dunleavy are out and they aren’t stupid enough to run their offense through Nesterovic, Hibbert of Foster.
I think Blake flat got picked
Sure, he was in a hurry to get the ball across mid-court. But Rudy got it to him in time. I think Blake would be the first to say that he messed up. Thankfully, it didn’t cost the team in the end.
"We don't back down to nobody." --Joel Przybilla

by 
































