Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: NFL Players Ready To Welcome Gay Teammate

Game 60 Recap: Blazers 107, Pacers 105

Boxscore

General Observations

That game was quite interesting.  Though that adjective could be taken positively or negatively.  It was an exciting game.  Perhaps it shouldn't have been.

The Blazers came out flatter than buffet-line prime rib.  They were slow, lacking energy, and seemingly intent on winning the game with offense.  The problem was their offense, with isolated exceptions, consisted of jumpers and/or weak one-on-one moves.  Meanwhile the Pacers, themselves masters of the offense-only win, showed us how it was done.  Them hitting shots off of passes wasn't disappointing.  That's what they do.  But the number of times they scored in the lane was painful and the number of times they grabbed offensive rebounds was flabbergasting.  The Pacers just don't get that many offensive boards.  The Blazers forced their center to commit helping on defense and then failed utterly to cover the rebound from ancillary positions.  Three Pacers got 3 offensive boards and two more grabbed a pair.  Meanwhile nobody was stopping T.J. Ford or Jarrett Jack and we managed to make Marquis Daniels look like the player the Pacers wanted instead of the player the Pacers got.  The opening period ended with Indiana up 26-20 but most of those Portland points came in a late-quarter flurry.  The quarter was worse than the score indicated.

In the second quarter at least we got our offense going to the tune of 32 points.  We remembered that the Pacers defend like...the Pacers and we got the ball inside and drew fouls.  Lamarcus Aldridge and Travis Outlaw were a big part of the scoring.  We also did a better job of closing out the lane against penetration, unfortunately at the expense of leaving the perimeter wide open.  I haven't seen that much swishing since my last trip to Darcelle XV.  (You go, girl!  Work those hips!)  The Pacers happily scored 33 and walked away with a 7-point halftime lead.

I'd love to be able to tell you that Portland came out fired up in the third quarter and took the game away but other than a turnover-plagued stretch for Indiana midway through the quarter each team basically had their way with each other.  Layups, jumpers, free throws, threes...we got a little of everything, including those offensive rebounds.  Every time the Blazers would come close Indiana would pull away again.  The net result was a 27-26 quarter, an 8-point lead for the Pacers entering the final period, and a lot of nervous Blazer fans.

In the fourth quarter the Blazers finally came out ready to play.  Brandon Roy picked up a microphone and said, "I'm glad you've had fun, but I told you play time was over a quarter and a half ago.  You didn't listen.  Now it's time for your spanking."  Well, I suppose he didn't really say that but he might as well have.  He called his own number left and right and connected almost every time he did.  Equal credit goes to Steve Blake and Lamarcus Aldridge, though.  In case you couldn't tell, up until this point the Blazers weren't having a good defensive game...not even (and maybe especially) Brandon.  Steve Blake finally manned up and stayed in front of Jarrett Jack and Lamarcus played the Blazer Center role in the smaller lineup to the hilt.  It seemed like he was all over the floor helping and recovering.  He really looked magnificent.

Still the game came down to an inbounds play with 18 seconds left and the Blazers up by two.  Portland got it to Rudy in the backcourt, which was the correct call since Indiana had to foul or the game was over.  But the Pacers trapped Rudy and he picked up his dribble.  Steve Blake ran back to help out but he got the pass right near the precarious halfcourt line area with a defender right behind him.  With the rushed pass and the unfortunate positioning Blake never handled the ball and Marquis "You AGAIN?" Daniels stole it and went in for an unopposed dunk and the tie.  Blazer ball, 11 seconds left.

Everybody and their uncle (and their uncle's coach and his agent and his agent's cat) knew who the ball was going to in that situation and indeed Roy got it and camped at the top of the arc, letting the clock run down.  Roy made his move and juked the defender, leaning into an amazing shot to win the game.  Well, OK, that's what SHOULD have happened.  Instead Roy only semi-juked his defender, ending up cutting diagonally across the lane at an awkward angle with T.J. Ford on him.  Ford gave him what looked on the big-screen  replay to be a small hip bump.  Roy fell to the ground.  Tweet!  Two free throws later Portland is up 2 with 1.7 seconds left.  Don't say we never get any questionable calls.

Timeout, yadda...yadda...who else but Jarrett Jack gets the ball?  He caught it, faked it, let the defender sail by, and ended up with an open-but-rushed look at a three to win it.  Such drama!  Such destiny!  Such a pity it went wide right.  Blazers escape with a win, 107-105.

The Blazers let the Pacers shoot almost 52% while getting up 83 shots, which normally is a recipe for disaster.  Indiana hit 5 more field goals and 3 more three-pointers than the Blazers.  Indiana outrebounded the Blazers.  Indiana had 16 assists to Portland's 13, which not only indicates that the Blazers weren't passing the ball but that Portland was making the Pacers look like great one-on-one players, which they pretty much aren't.  Indiana had 9 steals to Portland's 5, 7 blocks to Portland's 4.  So how the heck did the Blazers win this game?  The little sugar plum fairies in grey.  The Blazers shot 84.4% to Indiana's 75% from the charity stripe.  Oh, and Portland had 32 free throw attempts to Indiana's 16.  It's somewhat unusual for the Blazers to win that way, but there you go.

Individual Observations

Being live made it harder to keep good individual notes as I wasn't writing things down all game.  Although I always include stats in these I never like to do them solely from the stats because they're often misleading.  So the following will have to suffice:

--Roy, Aldridge, and Outlaw had great offensive games (28, 21, and 21) and Lamarcus had that good defensive stand as well.  Outlaw softened the Pacers up before Roy finished them.

--Joel Przybilla had another good rebounding night (12) but I felt sorry for how exposed his teammates left him after he worked so hard covering for them.  The hardest of the hard hats this year belong to the centers.

--It was not a good night for point guards.  Not only did they make T.J. Ford and Jarrett Jack look amazing instead of vulnerable not a one of them could hit a shot.  Blake's main contribution was hitting the three that finally put the Blazers ahead.  Bayless had a couple of nice defensive stands but otherwise didn't have a remarkable evening in his 13 minutes.  Sergio got 5 minutes.

--Rudy had a couple of memorable passes.  They're incredibly fun to watch live when you can see the whole play develop at once.

Final Thoughts

It's not surprising the Blazers struggled through this game after Sunday's masterpiece.  I just wish they wouldn't depend on the fourth quarter so heavily.  That's walking a pretty thin line.  Tonight's performance probably means that they will either recover and play another excellent game in Denver or that they'll continue downward and flop entirely.  It's Blazersedge Night.  I'm rooting for the former.

Check out the Indiana view at IndyCornrows.

Have fun with tomorrow's Jersey Contest form here. I just realized I left town without the contest administrator's site in hand so forgive me if the scores are slow in posting.

--Dave (blazersub@yahoo.com)

Comment 61 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Brandon decided he was going to win the game

There was nothing the Pacers could do to stop him from doing it.

Karma

by Sabonis4Ever on Mar 4, 2009 11:59 PM PST reply actions  

Except, you know, they didn't foul him

But, we’ll just ignore that since it benefited Portland ;)

Confusion breeds success. If they don't know each other, opponents can't have strategy. GENIUS.

by Ozzie Montana on Mar 5, 2009 12:26 AM PST up reply actions  

Jarrett Jack said afterwards

that when they saw it on film, it was the right call.

When I rule the world, everyone will know how to use Excel.

by jscot on Mar 5, 2009 1:12 AM PST up reply actions  

It was a borderline call

TJ hip checked Roy on the drive – he wouldn’t have gone down if he hadn’t been bumped. Too bad for Indy they were in the penalty.

by DonkeyShins on Mar 5, 2009 7:59 AM PST up reply actions  

He scored 24 points in the second half and 13 in the fourth quarter

The only way they could stop him was to foul and he went 8/8 on free throws.

Karma

by Sabonis4Ever on Mar 5, 2009 4:26 PM PST up reply actions  

Roy was magnificant! How good is he?!!!

The things that he does on a consistent basis simply flabbergast me. Truly he’s a very special player.

 I hear him being referred to as top 10 in the league. He’s better than that.

We simply have to gain the playoffs if for no other reason than to put Brandon on display to the NBA world of fans.

Brandon Roy just destroyed everything in his path. There's your rational analysis -- Dave

Also: COMCAST SUCKS!

by TwoDeep on Mar 5, 2009 7:04 AM PST up reply actions  

I'm really glad we pulled out this W.

We now are 4.5 games up on PHX.

Unfortunately, because our guys logged major minutes (42 and 38 for Roy and Aldridge, respectively), our chances for tomorrow went from about 20% to about 10%.

If the guys have been saving a big road performance in their back pocket all season, now would be an awfully good time to use it.

Boomshakalaka

by jksnake99 on Mar 5, 2009 12:02 AM PST reply actions  

What % would you have given the Pacers to win this game? They were on a back to back.

I don’t think being on a back to back will affect the Blazers as much as you think.

Karma

by Sabonis4Ever on Mar 5, 2009 12:04 AM PST up reply actions  

yeah, I guess you are right

I should give us a better chance to beat Denver than the Pacers to beat us (they only have 8 road wins). I probobly would have given Indy a 10% chance, so I should probobly give us a 20% chance. Still going to be tough though.

Boomshakalaka

by jksnake99 on Mar 5, 2009 1:15 AM PST up reply actions  

A back to back in Denver is harder

because of the altitude. You are already tired, and less oxygen saps your energy.

I’d still call it about 20%, because there are so many things that can happen. Last year, if I remember right, we went in there basically doomed (LMA was out) and Channing went crazy on them. All it takes is one guy having an insane night and everyone gets a lift, and suddenly the fatigue doesn’t matter so much. Or they have somebody key who gets the flu, or something.

But it will be harder because guys had to play long minutes, no question.

When I rule the world, everyone will know how to use Excel.

by jscot on Mar 5, 2009 1:16 AM PST up reply actions  

I remember that!

Channing dropped like 15 in the first half or something and we blew them out. That rocked.

Boomshakalaka

by jksnake99 on Mar 5, 2009 1:18 AM PST up reply actions  

Cue the Frye-sanity!

C’mon Channing, go aggro on the Nuggets again!

by DonkeyShins on Mar 5, 2009 8:00 AM PST up reply actions  

TJ Ford

I hope this guy has finally put his health issues behind him, he is incredibly fun to watch. While I would have liked a convincing win that allowed us to rest some starters in preparation for Denver, any win is a good win

An admission: After the OKC game, I said some things. Stupid things. Things about Nate not knowing how to coach GO. It was only then I realized that I was in danger of becoming that which I most loathe - an uninformed, knee jerk fan who reacts to wins with wild delusions of championships and losses with trade and firing fodder. I will not be that fan. From this point on I will support the Blazers, the coaches and front office wholeheartedly, offering praise and criticism appropriate to the matter at hand. I will never again be "that guy".

Blazeraddict
2/9/2009

by blazeraddict on Mar 5, 2009 12:06 AM PST reply actions  

he had a lot of crazy fadeaways that dropped

Want more aggressiveness? Try less Baylesslessness.

by prezofdeath on Mar 5, 2009 12:10 AM PST up reply actions  

I went to a game

against toronto the last year we had zach and tj ford beat us by himself and it was the same story. we had jarret jack on the time, but nobody could stay in front of him. against the right team, he can be deadly when healthy

I am starting the coalition to BRING BACK IKE.

by DNP (CD) on Mar 5, 2009 12:12 AM PST up reply actions  

no need to worry about our starters getting major minutes.

Ruffin, Shav, and Sergio should be ready to lead the charge.

by Tofu Anonymous on Mar 5, 2009 12:10 AM PST reply actions  

Up 1 with 1.7 seconds left, why didn´t Roy intentionally miss his free throw?

I think a missed shot gave them a better chance in defense than a time out, because there wasn´t time enough for a rebound (probably contested), a good pass and a good shot.

Sergio + Rudy = 16
Sergio + Bayless = 16
Batum 8+8=16

by amlmart1 on Mar 5, 2009 12:45 AM PST reply actions  

s'truth

in that situation, with that time, it was almost certainly going to be a three, so it didn’t matter if the Blazers were up one or two. So missing it intentionally after a first make is actually a pretty smart strategy. Nice!

by torridjoe on Mar 5, 2009 12:59 AM PST up reply actions  

If they had a timeout

then all the pacers had to do was grab the rebound and call timeout. And since the clock doesn’t start until someone touches the ball, only tenths of a second will be used. Timeout advances the ball to half court and they only need a two to win the game.

by Jerb on Mar 5, 2009 1:13 AM PST up reply actions  

Right

1.7 seconds is too much time left for that strategy. Less than a second, you miss. They would have at least 1.3 seconds, and you have to defend the whole court.

The other problem is that fouls happen, and if you inadvertently foul, you don’t want to lose just because your guy intentionally missed a free throw. So the intentional miss is dangerous, and you don’t want to do it unless it really does run them out of time completely.

When I rule the world, everyone will know how to use Excel.

by jscot on Mar 5, 2009 1:20 AM PST up reply actions  

Besides, how many times in that situation

have you seen the player try to miss and it still goes in? Didn’t Blake do just that a few games ago?

by MiledAnimal on Mar 5, 2009 10:16 AM PST up reply actions  

they had a timeout

I’d rather be ahead by 2 with 1.7 seconds left than up by 1 with 1.2 seconds left (assuming it would take them .5 seconds to rebound and call time).

If they hadn’t had a timeout, then missing the FT is the way to go.

Boomshakalaka

by jksnake99 on Mar 5, 2009 1:19 AM PST up reply actions  

OK, thanks guys. Always learning from you.

Sergio + Rudy = 16
Sergio + Bayless = 16
Batum 8+8=16

by amlmart1 on Mar 5, 2009 1:27 AM PST up reply actions  

also -- if we fouled their 3pt shot

better to be up 2 than 1 if putting their guy on the line to shoot 3.

ignacio

by ignacio on Mar 5, 2009 3:43 AM PST up reply actions  

Replay was clear - Brandon was fouled

Ford clearly hit him, and rightfully was called for the foul. Just because it isn’t usually called doesn’t mean it wasn’t right. We’ve all seen Brandon get bodied up on a regular basis without penalty on the defender. When it went back to replay, it was easy to see it was no different than any other shove, other than Ford didn’t use his hands.

by blacknoiseNW on Mar 5, 2009 1:14 AM PST reply actions  

Key to the W and our future success in the playoffs

Improved FT defense. Way to go, team.

When I rule the world, everyone will know how to use Excel.

by jscot on Mar 5, 2009 1:24 AM PST reply actions  

The biggest thing IMHO

Free throws. To quote Shoz – “You gotta make your free throws.” Tonight, the Blazers shot over 80% from the charity stripe and they won. If they had had a sub-par free-throw percentage (like they’ve had in several games) they would have lost.

What is ‘Improved FT defense’ BTW?

by DonkeyShins on Mar 5, 2009 8:03 AM PST up reply actions  

LOL

People have been talking about how teams always shoot FTs so well against us, far better than the league average. In this game, they didn’t. Our FT defense was improved.

How does a team play better FT defense? You tell me, and I’ll become a very rich NBA consultant. But however we did it, we did it.

When I rule the world, everyone will know how to use Excel.

by jscot on Mar 5, 2009 9:25 AM PST up reply actions  

Someone on here postulated something interesting...

I can’t remember who said it, but the basic idea is that Portland doesn’t make you work hard on offense as most of the team (other than Przy) is soft. That means Portland’s opponents are fairly well rested when they get to a line. You have to figure that fatigue is a big factor in free throw shooting and so is how you got fouled. If Shaq flattens you or Reggie Evans gives you the Przy special (two eggs over easy), you’re going to have a tough time at the line.

Watch the fouls called on Portland. Most of them are hand checks or other soft fouls.

by torsoheap on Mar 5, 2009 9:32 AM PST up reply actions  

Rudy had a really nice game

His stats for this game don’t look that impressive, but Rudy’s passing set up a lot of good plays. He got credit for 4 assists, but he also helped create a bunch of other opportunities where he didn’t get an assist.

He played some pretty good defense down the stretch too. In the 4th quarter the Pacers were alternating between running iso plays for Jack (who was guarded by Rudy) and TJ Ford (who was guarded by Blake). On most of the Jack isos, Jarrett would end up spending about half the time on the shot clock trying to get past Rudy without getting a good shot before giving up and handing the ball over to TJ Ford.

Batum also made a bunch of nice hustle plays that don’t show up in the box score (as usual). It seems like Rudy and Nic are both better than their stats indicate, which is something that is unusual for a rookie.

by trk on Mar 5, 2009 2:02 AM PST reply actions  

Rudy cementing his place as the best passer on the team

"Sergio and I obtained chalupas to understand their power. Then Sergio showed that each one has 427 calories and 27 grams of fat. Leaping upwards, we reviled the accursed chalupa and its pressure. – Rudy Fernandez

by LetsBlaze on Mar 5, 2009 4:45 AM PST up reply actions   1 recs

plus one

Brandon Roy just destroyed everything in his path. There's your rational analysis -- Dave

Also: COMCAST SUCKS!

by TwoDeep on Mar 5, 2009 7:29 AM PST up reply actions  

indeed

Want more aggressiveness? Try less Baylesslessness.

by prezofdeath on Mar 5, 2009 9:34 AM PST up reply actions  

i don't think we should take for granted travis going off for 17 in the first half

brandon was only 2-6 at and lamarcus had bad shooting numbers as well. blake hadnt hit a single shot.

having the capacity to come in and just “go off” like that, unguardably, well… it’s nice to have someone like that around.

ignacio

by ignacio on Mar 5, 2009 3:50 AM PST reply actions  

Yes

Travis was the only thing that kept us from getting buried in the first half.

"I saw him in the face" Sergio's quote on the latest alley-oop to Rudy.

by blazermaniac32 on Mar 5, 2009 6:56 AM PST up reply actions  

Definitely.

 …… and par for the course, he hit a big shot at the end too.

Brandon Roy just destroyed everything in his path. There's your rational analysis -- Dave

Also: COMCAST SUCKS!

by TwoDeep on Mar 5, 2009 7:25 AM PST up reply actions  

And Ben's picture shows

How amazing it was that he didn’t foul Jack on that last play. Kind of turned his body in mid-air to avoid the collision. Whew!

"I saw him in the face" Sergio's quote on the latest alley-oop to Rudy.

by blazermaniac32 on Mar 5, 2009 10:13 AM PST up reply actions  

I had the same thought at the time:

“Where would the Blazers be in this game without Trout?”

"We don't back down to nobody." --Joel Przybilla

by hurryup09 on Mar 5, 2009 2:31 PM PST up reply actions  

As Roy said in his post game interview ....

that was a good team we played. We did well to come away victorious with them playing at the level they were last night. It was a terrific, exciting win.

Why did Dallas ever get rid of Marquis Daniels?! He’s pretty good. And he looked pretty good too when he was with the Mavericks. I believe they thought they already had his position covered making him expendable. Bad mistake me thinks.

Brandon Roy just destroyed everything in his path. There's your rational analysis -- Dave

Also: COMCAST SUCKS!

by TwoDeep on Mar 5, 2009 7:24 AM PST reply actions  

B-Roy's "defense"
In case you couldn’t tell, up until this point the Blazers weren’t having a good defensive game…not even (and maybe especially) Brandon.

Understatement of the month.

I love Roy, but wow, he was atrocious on D last night. Marquis Daniels has never looked so competent. I won’t say good, because most of his points looked like an average high school bball player could’ve scored them. Three or four dribbles from the foul line followed by a stop, then an awkward but virtually uncontested layup with little to no elevation. Uggggglly. Very, very ugly.

I saw three or four of these before finally starting to rewind the DVR to see who was allowing these pathetic “drives” to happen. Had to be Travis, right? Maybe Blake, or young Nic? No, no, and no. Much to my dismay, it was Brandon every time.

Imagine working at a family convenience store, and checking the surveillance camera to see who stole money from the counter, and turns out it’s your mom. That’s what it felt like.

(It wasn’t quite this dramatic, but Lebron suffered from the same lack of committment to D up until this year. Most of the great ones don’t start giving equal effort on that end until probably year four or five. Hopefully Brandon follows the same pattern.)

Q: Is Greg favoring his knee?
Frye: He favors dunking on your head, that's what he favors.

by KP Corleone on Mar 5, 2009 7:33 AM PST reply actions  

Remind me not to hire your mom

:-P

Yeah, I was very disappointed with Brandon’s D tonight. I hope Joel or Steve called him on it during or after the game.

by DonkeyShins on Mar 5, 2009 8:04 AM PST up reply actions  

I saw Joel getting in his ear

during the game….it might have been re this issue….Joel don’t like that crap

"You're welcome friend
I love you."
- Tom "Dragline" inHawaii

by 92wastheyear on Mar 5, 2009 11:52 AM PST up reply actions  

It's too bad Joel

is the only one willing to call out his teammates, but maybe he’s the only one who actually knows how to play defense.

by torsoheap on Mar 5, 2009 12:01 PM PST up reply actions  

Well...
I haven’t seen that much swishing since my last trip to Darcelle XV. (You go, girl! Work those hips!)

We learn something new about Dave on a regular basis, don’t we?

Dave – I’m looking forward to you describing an opposing team in a post-game write-up as “attacking the basket like a bunch of angry drag queens.” (cue Buddy Cole monologue).

by DonkeyShins on Mar 5, 2009 8:07 AM PST reply actions  

Wow.

Never thought I’d see a Darcelle’s reference on BE. I have now seen it all.

"Respect everyone, fear no one." -TP

by Arby on Mar 5, 2009 8:22 AM PST reply actions  

Was the inbounds to Rudy really the right play?

Travis was wide open near-ish the basket.
I know we’d rather see Rudy at the line, but the desperation inbounds heave across half court looked like a recipe for disaster, and boy, the outcome sure came close to one. And they chose not to foul Rudy anyway.

Given our propensity to not get the ball in at all on the inbounds play, I’d rather see that go to Travis. But I guess it all worked out okay in the end.

by Section323 on Mar 5, 2009 9:16 AM PST reply actions  

I hated that 2nd pass though

Rudy just needed to wrap up the freakin’ ball and let them foul you…..why try to work the ball at all…am I missing somethin’?

"You're welcome friend
I love you."
- Tom "Dragline" inHawaii

by 92wastheyear on Mar 5, 2009 11:53 AM PST up reply actions  

The Pacers would have fouled once the Blazers got past half court

They were trying to trap them in the back court to get a 8 second call. Rudy should not have picked up his dribble and Blake should have not lost his dribble. Just very bad execution. Passing into Rudy was safer, Blake just blew it.

Karma

by Sabonis4Ever on Mar 5, 2009 4:35 PM PST up reply actions  

The wouldn't have fouled Rudy

Unless he got across the half court line.

Karma

by Sabonis4Ever on Mar 5, 2009 4:36 PM PST up reply actions  

How was Portland able to keep Tony Parker in check

on Sunday, but not Ford and Jack last night? What was the difference? Portland has trouble with quick players (Parker, Ford, Jack, Brooks, etc.) because its guards are slow yet Parker was fairly ordinary the last time they met up.

Roy gets a lot of love for his contributions on offense, but he needs to put more effort in on the defensive end. As KP Corleone pointed out above, Daniels had too many free trips down the middle. That ole defense puts a lot of pressure on the center and he has to back off to avoid the foul.

I know there are a lot of Bayless supporters here, but I just don’t see great defense from him. It didn’t seem to matter who was guarding Ford or Jack as they got nearly every shot off uncontested.

by torsoheap on Mar 5, 2009 9:25 AM PST reply actions  

So why couldn't Portland game plan for Jack and Ford?

Daniels was a bit of a surprise so they’re off the hook for him, but Jack has been playing well for a couple of weeks now and Ford is a known quantity as well.

by torsoheap on Mar 5, 2009 10:39 AM PST up reply actions  

Disagree about Bayless

I think Bayless brings a decidedly different attitude. I don’t remember any free looks for those guys while he was in. And if they did get them, it was Bayless getting separated for a few seconds off a screen.

Bayless looks tougher and more focused on D than the Blazers other perimeter defenders. He’s still learning about switches, picks, and rotations, but his on ball D is already close to the best on the team. Nic has the stopper rep, but he’s not strong enough yet to really keep guys away from the rack.

Q: Is Greg favoring his knee?
Frye: He favors dunking on your head, that's what he favors.

by KP Corleone on Mar 5, 2009 10:33 AM PST up reply actions  

It's all relative.
Bayless looks tougher and more focused on D than the Blazers other perimeter defenders.

It’s not hard to be a better perimeter defender than most of Portland’s guards. It’s frustrating to watch, time and time again, dudes get to the rim without too much resistance.

Bayless gets credit for effort and does a pretty good job of staying in front of his man, but I haven’t seen him lock down anyone yet. Of course, it’s just his first year in the NBA and he does seem to have the tools.

by torsoheap on Mar 5, 2009 10:38 AM PST up reply actions  

It seemed like part of the reason why Portland was able to contain Parker was because SA didn't use him as much

The first time we played the Spurs, they ran a lot of plays for Parker because they didn’t have anyone else who could score a lot of points. In the second game Duncan was back so they started running plays for Duncan instead of Parker.

by trk on Mar 5, 2009 11:38 AM PST up reply actions  

Good point.

I guess that’s a frowny face for Popovich for not realizing that Portland can’t guard quick dudes.

Indiana didn’t have much choice since Granger and Dunleavy are out and they aren’t stupid enough to run their offense through Nesterovic, Hibbert of Foster.

by torsoheap on Mar 5, 2009 11:51 AM PST up reply actions  

I think Blake flat got picked

Sure, he was in a hurry to get the ball across mid-court. But Rudy got it to him in time. I think Blake would be the first to say that he messed up. Thankfully, it didn’t cost the team in the end.

"We don't back down to nobody." --Joel Przybilla

by hurryup09 on Mar 5, 2009 2:35 PM PST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

The ultimate coverage and analysis of the Portland Trail Blazers.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Photo_3__small
JD 5/22
Bns_small
You're The GM. Whats your move?
Small
Hard to be a fan of a team that is so poorly managed.
Cs-sj_053_small
10 Years of 1st Round Blazer Draft Picks
Small
Draft Drawer: Pre-Lotto

Recent FanPosts

Small
Keep an Eye on Great Britain
Small
two options with $20 mill cap space, the #6 pick and some luck
Batum_small
Alternate 2012 Olympics Team
Small
Collective mock draft
Small
GM Poll: K Love or L Train
Small
Off season ideas
Small
Why we should Draft Damian Lillard
Small
The Art Of Drafting
Small
Chris Broussard Reporting LA Open to Shopping Pau---Pau to PDX?
Megayacht-octopus-plus-paul-allen_small
The NBA Draft Lottery Is More Than Just Luck

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

FanShots

Quick hits of video, photos, quotes, chats, links and lists that you find around the web.

Recommended FanShots

Assistant Michael Malone interested in the Blazers
The LeBron James Conundrum: A Legacy In Question
Shooting percentages as they apply to certain areas of the court.  Note who one of the best shooters in the NBA from the wing is.  Check out the guy dominating under the hoop as well.  Pretty impressive for a 6'9'' guy.
Fernandez: Joel Freeland Faces July 10 Deadline For Contract Buyout
Church of Basketball: An Interview With Dave

Recent FanShots

Ferry in mix for vacant Portland GM job
Where's The GM?
Orlando Magic has decided to trade Dwight Howard
If the Sixers are eliminated by the Boston Celtics in Game 7, the general...
Interesting Quotation from Chad Ford RE: Morway and Rebuilding
Malone is a winner...
Lamarcus aldridge first nba game
Shaq a legitimate candidate for Orlando GM job...

+ New FanShot All FanShots >


Editors

Kitten_small Dave

Headshotsmall_small Ben Golliver

Lead Moderators

Getfuzzy-satchel_small Timmay!

Bucky3_small Cablinasian

Authors

Plainlc_small Storyteller

Moderators

Lamb_small T Darkstar

Small douglast

Terryporter_small prezofdeath

Small usmcr3049

Lrg_magpie_small Corvid

Wallpaper_small geoffm