Game 74 Preview: Jazz vs. Blazers
A Look at the Jazz
It's been a while since we've seen Utah. Though they're obviously two very different teams our story arc against the Jazz has mirrored the one against the Phoenix Suns so far. We played them twice at their place early on and lost. Just when it looked like they might have our number we pull out a redemptive win at home. And now the final match has arrived, determining whether we'll end the season tied heads-up or go down 1-3. Let's hope the Blazers remember what the win against Phoenix felt like. We could use a repeat performance tonight.
Since the Blazers defeated them on the last day of January Utah has been on quite a roll. They've gone 20-5 since, to be exact. Their offense has been impressive. They notched 105+ in 13 of those 25 games. Deron Williams has been lighting it up with a little help from Mehmet Okur. Carlos Boozer was injured through February and hasn't gotten back on the big-time scoring track since his return but he's been posting triple-doubles like he's been channeling the ghost of Jason Kidd.
(For the youngsters in the crowd Jason Kidd was an old-time point guard who used to notch triple-doubles every other night or so in his prime. He also was a pretty good defender which made him quite val...what? No ghost to channel? He's still alive? Well I'll be darned. Let me know what retirement home he's in so I can send an apology note for the comment then. Huh? He's still PLAYING?!? What kind of team would...oh. Dallas. Well, I'm sure they didn't give up too much for him anyway. WHAT? They did WHAT??? OK, just stop. April Fool's Day isn't until tomorrow. What do you take me for, anyway?)
So anyway, back to the Jazz. They're playing quite well. The one thing you can say about their run lately is that only about 1/3 of those opponents were playoff teams. But once you're on a roll you can win against any level of competition. They're a far better home team than road team, however. In this 20-5 stretch they have not beaten an above-.500 team on the road. In fact they've only managed that feat twice all year.
As has been typical the last few years the Jazz trade on their offense. They are excellent percentage shooters and first in the league overall in assists. Those two stats go hand in hand for them. They don't take many stupid shots. They love screens and are more than competent in their mid-range game. They're tricky to guard because they always seem to have options and they know how to take advantage of them. You can't just deny one player, set, or spot on the floor and solve them. Their point guard can post and drive. Their center can shoot outside. Boozer can do whatever you need. They can run and play in the halfcourt. They make you play honest defense for 48 minutes at multiple positions. Utah is 3rd in the league in free throws attempted and made, which generates those critical extra points. Outside of a couple players (Okur, Kyle Korver, C.J. Miles) they're not proficient from distance. They don't rely on the long ball much, however. It's a refresher between courses instead of a main dish.
The Jazz have made strides defensively this year as well. They're tied with Denver for 9th in the league in defensive efficiency. They try to get after you on the perimeter. They force steals and mistakes. This masks their deficiencies inside. When they can't follow the script defensively Utah gets in trouble. They allow a lot of points on the fastbreak and in the paint. They break down more on the road, allowing 4 more fastbreak points and 2 more points inside on average. 6 points make a big difference in the average NBA game.
Utah is a good offensive rebounding team but suffers on the defensive end. Their defensive rebounding also falls off a cliff on the road.
Shooting guard Ronnie Brewer and small forward C.J. Miles join the Big Three in the starting lineup. Brewer has been generating points recently and his athleticism is a good complement to the skill of the frontcourt and Deron Williams' game. Miles is a defender and distance shooter. Their return to health has made the Jazz bench deeper. Paul Millsap now comes off of the pines along with Kyle Korver, Matt Harpring, and a still-hobbled Andrei Kirilenko. They've got a mix of scoring, hustle, and defense there.
Keys to the Game
1. This is a big game for the Jazz. The best way to counter any drive they might summon is to do exactly what we did to Phoenix the other night: put them down early and never let it be a ballgame. Utah is a playoff team. Utah is a good team. Utah has had neither success nor positive feedback on the road this year. They're also on the second night of a back-to-back while we're rested. Make it easy for them to lose.
2. The battle of the big men is always pivotal when these two teams meet. You'll see a direct contrast of styles in the middle. Mehmet Okur, an offensive center, plays outside and wants to draw our guys to the perimeter, neutralizing their defense and rebounding. Przybilla and Oden are big, defensive-minded, and have more affinity to paint than Sherwin Williams. The Blazers need to find a way to bother Okur without chasing him with 7-footers. The Portland centers also have to pound inside and grab tons of boards on both ends. Equally important are the power forward matchups. The Jazz bring Boozer and Millsap. Both of them can score in the post and rebound. The Blazers bring Aldridge and Outlaw--more mobile, faster, more range, but not great post defenders and spotty rebounders. The Portland duo needs to hang close with their Utah counterparts.
3. Fast break when you can. You need points against this team.
4. The guards have got to take care of the ball.
5. We could own an advantage at the three-point line if Rudy and Travis are on.
Final Thoughts
The Blazers have been on such a nice run lately that it's hard to imagine this as anything but a win. Let's hope the Jazz don't disabuse us of that notion.
Check out the view from Salt Lake City at SLCDunk.
Enter the final game of the Jersey Contest regular season here. DON'T FORGET to check out the playoff list on Wednesday.
--Dave (blazersub@yahoo.com)
53 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
They are on a back to back
We are at home. Victory shall be ours.
P.S. I think I hate the Jazz.
Karma
p.p.s.
Thanks for the reminder about April fools. Shanigians and tomfoolery will run rampant.
Karma
by Sabonis4Ever on Mar 30, 2009 11:58 PM PDT up reply actions
Let's hope so
To quote a certain Corellian: “Great, kid. Don’t get cocky!”
This game is extremely dangerous and extremely important for the Blazers. Complacency will bite them on the tushie.
lets git 'em boys
I’d really prefer this game to be in the vein of the recent home blowouts in big games (Lakers, Spurs, Suns) where we have it won by halftime. I want to see Ruffin, Shav, Channing, and Bayless all play double digit minutes.
"Travis has more hops than a bunny in a brewery. He elevates so high his seat doubles as a flotation device."
-Dave
For Ruffin to play 10 minutes under Nate
We’d have to be up by 30+ entering the 4th, since apparently a 21 point lead isn’t enough to rest LMA.
75 point lead three minutes left b-roy and lma hit bench ...we collapse and lose by one
cause theres no dead ball to put them back in
"Sergio and I obtained chalupas to understand their power. Then Sergio showed that each one has 427 calories and 27 grams of fat. Leaping upwards, we reviled the accursed chalupa and its pressure. – Rudy Fernandez
wrong
12:00am post says otherwise…..
OH SNAP!
and don’t give me any business about other time zones or greenwitches on broom sticks…..this is a portland blog, baby!
Tweet me!
11:45 actually...
still technically the 30th. I’ll give you your snap back now.
"Travis has more hops than a bunny in a brewery. He elevates so high his seat doubles as a flotation device."
-Dave
by SabonisBonus on Mar 31, 2009 8:45 AM PDT up reply actions
sabonis4ever's post was at 12:00am though
notice i oh-snapped him and not jordan, because jordan posted at 11:59, so technically it was still two days away. For S4E, it really was tomorrow, because of the 12am posting time.
I’ll take that OH SNAP and snap it on you.
OH SNAP!
—prez of snap
Tweet me!
But my first post was at 11:55
OH SNAP!
Karma
by Sabonis4Ever on Mar 31, 2009 11:49 PM PDT up reply actions
that's not o-snappable--you were already oh-snapped, and it was legit.
si usted puede leer esto, el grito.
that was just an early joke...
he knows exactly when it is, he just played you.
"Travis has more hops than a bunny in a brewery. He elevates so high his seat doubles as a flotation device."
-Dave
by SabonisBonus on Mar 31, 2009 12:01 AM PDT up reply actions
I'm looking forward to this game...
The Utah Jazz is my only other ‘so-so’ favorite western team to watch… but watching my life-long, beloved, ‘Blazing’ Blazers, is like watching a YouTube Phenomenon!…
And they look somewhat identical to the Blazers as well… Franchise-wise… Mid-Market Franchise, that is!
I smell a W in the RG! Go Blazers!!!
"Here's Blake To Roy... This Is For The Win... YESSSS!!!!!!" - Marv Albert
by pumping_iron22 on Mar 31, 2009 12:21 AM PDT reply actions
Aldridge must step it up on Okur
Good preview, thanks. Long time listener, first time caller (commenter).
I think one of the top 2 or 3 keys to the game is take Mehmet Okur out of his offensive rythm — actually frustrate him. More than Boozer or Williams, I feel like the Blazer defense for some reason can’t contain him, and can’t stop the momentum that the Jazz develop when Okur gets on a roll from 15 feet and out.
On the plus side, Aldridge has been playing the most physical ball of his career. But he has to step that up tonight…
That said, we’re going to destroy the Jizz!
- Neo
p.s. Hail, Sabonis tribe :)
Sabonis deserves the honor.. One of my favorite all time Blazers
He was a critical piece of our ALMOST world cham team. Blazers should invite him back to watch the Blazers in the playoffs, at least if they make a good run.
Blazers need to put Sabonis under a giant pillow
Oden can then sleep on the Sabonis pillow for a night and absorb the Sabonis passing/finesse powers.
(Ii it worked for my Biopsych midterm, it can work for this!)
Hail!
and welcome to the fraternity
"Travis has more hops than a bunny in a brewery. He elevates so high his seat doubles as a flotation device."
-Dave
by SabonisBonus on Mar 31, 2009 8:03 AM PDT up reply actions
There was something from someone named Jacob
It had to do with upping our expectations for the team.
Holy cow, I didn't realize they've been 20-5 since we saw them last
Uh, needless to say, this a must-win game. Our home honor is on the line.
by Corvid on Mar 31, 2009 12:37 AM PDT reply actions 1 recs
tominhawaii is a bad influence on you
i purport there are no more must win games this season. only “this would be a really nice win” games.
Tweet me!
He takes all our sins away upon him, the Little Devil.
Sergio + Rudy = 16
Sergio + Bayless = 16
Batum 8+8=16
they they were oh and seventy three, we'd be perfectly set to get ricky rubio or tyler hansborough.
Tweet me!
i've always disliked the jazz,
the utah jazz that is. why couldn’t they have come up with a more appropriate name for a team in salt lake city after they took the team out of new orleans?
and then i didn’t like them with adrian dantley. i liked them much less with karl malone.
ignacio
i still don't like them.
i hold grudges for phantom fouls called by jake o’donnell on buck williams when he was guarding malone.
i didn’t like stockton either.
i don’t like the jazz.
ignacio
You are so right,
Dave, about the power forwards. Those match-ups, and whether we can generate some points in transition will likely decide this game.
I would almost suggest switching the fours and fives on defense with Okur on the court
So if Okur was on the court, and either Priz or Oden are on the court, have them cover the rugged fours of Utah (boozer or millsap) and have one of our fours (aldridge, frye, or even outlaw) cover Okur on the outside or in the high paint. This would keep our big men by the boards, away from the perimeter, and put someone faster and more mobile on Okur. Someone tell me if that doesn’t make sense…
"In general, I hate the snap judgments. I hate the rush to predict things. I hate the sports culture that can't think of anything to say unless it is predicting things. I dislike the over-hyping and the following angst-ridden crashes. I dislike the overdrawn, over-simplified, nuance-free generalizations that sprout like weeds over the conversational landscape because accuracy and fairness and truth don't fit as neatly between commercials or quote as easily around the water cooler."
-Dave
Nate's already done that some
When I rule the world, everyone will know how to use Excel.
Never too busy to nitpick
In this 20-5 stretch they have not beaten an above-.500 team on the road. In fact they’ve only managed that feat twice all year.
By my records, they’ve only got one win against a team currently over .500, Philadelphia on Nov. 11 (Philly was rubbish early, 2-5 after that game, so no great accomplishment). They beat NJ and Detroit early, when both were over .500, but that doesn’t look like a stellar accomplishment anymore.
They haven’t beat anyone on the road that is anywhere near as good as Portland. Their road wins are:
Rubbish teams (less than .400 winning percentage)
Sacramento (2)
Memphis (2)
LAC
Minnesota (2)
G.S.
Toronto
OKC
Respectable teams (current winning percentage .400-514)
NJ
Indiana
Detroit
Philly
Good teams (current winning percentage over .514)
crickets chirp
They have road losses at NY, Washington, Charlotte, Chicago, Milwaukee, OKC, GS, and a lot more.
They are likely to get a win or two the rest of the way on the road against good teams, they are too good to lose them all. Don’t let them start tonight.
When I rule the world, everyone will know how to use Excel.
Maybe he meant beat 2 teams when they were over .500!
Like you said, beating Philly back then was no big deal because they sucked, but by the same logic beating NJ and Detroit was a little better back then since they didn’t quite suck yet.
OK ... OK ... Just 11 hours and 20 minutes left until game time.
i can do that, right?
Yeah sure, no problem.
This ’ll be easy … … … (jittering already setting in …)
Rudyculize: The act of Rudy making others look slow, dim and generally oafish.
http://www.myspace.com/y5k
Help
How can a team be a good offensive rebounding team but a poor defensive rebounding team? Shouldn’t both stats measure out about the same?
by TrentEdwardsHoF2018 on Mar 31, 2009 6:49 AM PDT reply actions
Nope
Your team could get 33% of the offensive rebounds that are available, which is really good.
BUT
If you only get 67% of the defensive rebounds, you’re effectively nulling your good offensive rebounding by allowing them to hit the offensive boards as well.
And on a random note
Someone asked last week if a team has ever gotten more offensive rebounds than their opponents got defensive rebounds. I’m sure it has happened before (albeit very rarely) but Portland did against Memphis.
21 O rebounds to their 20 D rebounds. That means over half of our missed shots came back to us!
So an offensive reb is much more valuable.
by TrentEdwardsHoF2018 on Mar 31, 2009 11:40 AM PDT up reply actions
Not really
A defensive rebound keeps your opponents from getting an offensive rebound. Being a good offensive rebounding team means nothing if you don’t hit the defensive glass, because then your opponent automatically becomes a good offensive rebounding team as well.
when i submit my jersey contest i keep gettin this error
Fatal error: Cannot break/continue 1 level in /home/reaxion/public_html/blazersedge/gameform.php on line 22
Oden...Aldridge...Roy.....THE REAL BIG THREE
The Jazz can't win on the road, it would take a monumental no-show to lose tonight's game
So hopefully the Blazers show up. They have been lately (cept Philly)
Blazer Fan

by 
































