Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: This Week In GIFs

Magic Numbers (UPDATED 3/20)

 

3/20 Update:

 

It's been nearly a week since the last Magic Numbers update; nowadays the Big O is publishing the Blazers magic number in the paper.   Since we lost last night and Phoenix was idle, we're still at 9.  It's probably also useful to note our magic number with respect to the Mavs--any combination of Blazer wins and Dallas losses adding to 12 would clinch us a playoff berth.

It's also worth noting the magic numbers (to clinch) of the other Western teams whose playoff fate is not yet known.  SA and Houston (45 wins) both have magic numbers of 7, Denver is at 8, we're at 9, Utah and New Orleans are at 10, and Dallas has a magic number of 11. 

Tonight in the NBA:  We're idle, as is Phoenix, and the other six teams in the WC playoff hunt (excluding the Lakers who have clinched) are playing.  Four of them, unfortunately, have what look to be gimmes tonight.

 

Dallas visits the Pacers.  May Jarrett Jack not step on the line too many times.

Memphis sails down the Mississippi to play the Hornets.

Utah visits the Thunder.

Minnesota visits the Rockets.

In the game of the night, Boston visits the Spurs.

And Denver gets paid a visit by the Wizards.

 

==========================================================

 

 

While it's still a bit early for any Blazer-related magic numbers to be worth discussing much, lets discuss them anyway.

The Blazers magic number to clinch a playoff berth is:  20.  That can be computed by adding our wins (37) with the losses of Phoenix, the current #9 seed (26), and subtracting the result from 83 (82 games + 1 extra to break ties).

83 - (37 + 26) = 20.

Any combination of Blazer wins and Phoenix losses that add up to 20, and we're in.

OTOH, the magic number for the Blazers to be eliminated is computed by using our losses and Phoenix's wins--that number is 83 - (22 + 34) = 27.  Any combination of losses by the Blazers, and wins by Phoenix (or whoever is #9) puts us out of the playoffs.

The good thing is that the first number is less than the second number--and also less than our number of games remaining (23), meaning that we control our own destiny.

The Sacramento Kings are the first team in the West to be eliminated from the playoffs; as they are below the line their magic number is computed with respect to the current #8 seed, Dallas.  The Mavs have 36 wins, the Kings have 48 losses, which adds up to 84.  Doh.  The Clippers have a magic number of one--they could tie Dallas if they won every remaining game and the Mavs lost--but other than that, they're out.  OKC's magic number is 2; Memphis has some breathing room at 4, and the T-Wolves have a magic number of 5.  Golden State has a magic number of eight.

 

I believe the standing on CNNSI are up-to-date with tonight's action; Phoenix lost.  If not, then our magic number to make the playoffs is 19 and not 20.

UPDATE (3/4):  A few other numbers, since folks asked:

1) Blazers magic number to clinch a top 4 seed, and homecourt in the first round.   Right now that number is 24 (83 - 37 PDX wins - 22 Houston losses).  That assumes we stay ahead of New Orleans, who we are tied with for 5th.

2) Blazers magic number to win the NW Division.  Same--24.   Denver has a 39-22 record, just like Houston.

3) Blazers magic number to win the Western Conference.  34 (83 - 37 PDX wins - 12 Laker losses).  Probably won't happen.

Tonight's games involving WC playoff contenders:  Phoenix is @Miami, San Antonio is @Dallas, Indiana @Portland, and Houston @Utah.  Lakers, Nuggets, and Hornets are idle.

If Dallas wins OR the Clippers (hosting Memphis) lose, the Clippers are out of the playoffs.  If Dallas wins AND the Thunder (hosting the Wizards) lose, the Thunder are gone.

Comment 72 comments  |  10 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Go Blazers!

Do the Magic for home court!

by LaoTzu on Mar 3, 2009 9:07 PM PST reply actions  

Hmm

If Phoenix and Portland both lose 15 games, I bet neither one makes the playoffs.

by CatMan2 on Mar 3, 2009 9:33 PM PST reply actions  

Portland would still make the playoffs

They would have 41 wins and Golden State would have to win all but 2 of their remaining games to reach 41.

by trk on Mar 3, 2009 9:40 PM PST up reply actions  

I have to admit I was too lazy to look at the standings

and didn’t realize that GS was so far behind. Still, my point stands, which is that there are scenarios where neither the Blazers nor and Suns get to the playoffs. Unlikely, yes. I’ll text Hollinger to get the odds.

by CatMan2 on Mar 3, 2009 10:15 PM PST up reply actions  

The most wins G.S. can get is 43

They do own the tiebreaker against us, though, which bolsters your argument not at all. :)

When I rule the world, everyone will know how to use Excel.

by jscot on Mar 3, 2009 10:18 PM PST up reply actions  

Okay, next time I'll work out a better example

My point could be summarized as: the fate of the Blazers and the Suns may not, and probably does not, rest solely on the other team.

by CatMan2 on Mar 3, 2009 10:22 PM PST up reply actions  

In theory

Suns could pass Blazers, but someone else could bomb and stay below Portland.

OR

Suns could pass someone else and make playoffs not against Blazers.

This is Blazers Edge though, not some other team’s edge.

by Zaig on Mar 4, 2009 9:16 AM PST up reply actions   2 recs

Furthermore

there are scenarios in which BOTH Phoenix and Portland make it. This must be fairly likely, I’m guessing, probability > 0.1?

by CatMan2 on Mar 3, 2009 10:20 PM PST up reply actions  

for sure

there is a greater than .1 chance that either Dallas or Utah miss the playoffs and both Portland and Phoenix make it.

Boomshakalaka

by jksnake99 on Mar 3, 2009 10:49 PM PST up reply actions  

Based on Hollinger's playoff odds

there is a 62.3% chance of both Portland and Phoenix making the playoffs.

by trk on Mar 3, 2009 10:49 PM PST up reply actions  

Based on my subjective opinion

I think there is less than a 50% chance of Phoenix making it.

When I rule the world, everyone will know how to use Excel.

by jscot on Mar 3, 2009 11:02 PM PST up reply actions   1 recs

Utah is too strong, now, for Phoenix to catch them.

And Phoenix faces three more brutal road games.

The only reasons Shaq helps Phoenix:
1. When Nash is sitting or out, Phoenix is forced into the halfcourt.
2. Shaq can dominate some opposing bigs, with the help of his little, striped friends.

by LaoTzu on Mar 3, 2009 11:12 PM PST up reply actions  

coolstandings gives them a 51.9% chance to make it (updated after tonight's games)

next most likely to miss out is Dallas- 67.3 % chance to make it

all the other Western 9 have playoff odds over 90%.

Also of interest, here are the current coolstandings NW Division title odds: Denver 51.9, Portland 37.0, Utah 11.1

Boomshakalaka

by jksnake99 on Mar 3, 2009 11:30 PM PST up reply actions  

Yes

Very, very difficult for them to win the division. But they are opening a gap on Phoenix that I don’t think the Suns can make up, even with that schedule.

I would put NW odds right now at Denver 65, Portland 25, Utah 10%.

Scenario 1: We lose to Denver and they lose to Utah. This is expected, and would not change the odds at all.

Scenario 2: Denver sweeps. Denver 80, Portland 15, Utah 5%. (Denver does what is expected at home, but then steals a win, breaks Utah’s momentum, and re-opens a gap. With their easy schedule ahead, they almost certainly wouldn’t be caught.)

Scenario 3: Denver splits the other way (losing to us, winning at Utah). Denver 50, Portland 45, Utah 5%. (Denver loses their advantage but then regains it with a tough and surprising win at Utah).

Scenario 4: Denver loses both. Portland 50, Denver 40, Utah 10%. (Denver loses their advantage against us and can’t claw it back in Utah. Edge to Portland and probably the tie-breaker goes to Portland as well. Still a long way to go.)

When I rule the world, everyone will know how to use Excel.

by jscot on Mar 4, 2009 2:02 AM PST up reply actions  

Do they adjust

for things like Amare’s injury?

Dallas has no major injuries.

When I rule the world, everyone will know how to use Excel.

by jscot on Mar 4, 2009 1:49 AM PST up reply actions  

No they don't

their playoff odds are point differential based like Hollingers

by tingeyga on Mar 4, 2009 9:13 AM PST up reply actions  

Dallas

I thought Josh Howard was having some bone spur issues with both ankles that could shelve him fo some games?

I try to help with everything," Fernandez said. "If the coach says go rebound, I go rebound. I work for the team.

""If I'm playing this game to get media and attention, I shouldn't be here," Aldridge said. "I'm here to play basketball, and do what I can do to help this team win."

by Dragonage on Mar 4, 2009 12:39 PM PST up reply actions  

Could be

I should have said I was unaware of any. I’m not following them real closely, to be honest. They are going to finish somewhere 7-9 (probably 8th seed). They are extremely unlikely to catch us in the seedings battle, and we are extremely unlikely to face them in the first round (we would have to finish first or second seed), so I haven’t been paying close attention.

When I rule the world, everyone will know how to use Excel.

by jscot on Mar 4, 2009 11:35 PM PST up reply actions  

Per Hollinger
There’s only a 14.4 percent chance that somebody besides Dallas or Phoenix finishes ninth in the West, with Portland (4.7 percent) having the greatest shot.

by The Thinker on Mar 10, 2009 11:14 AM PDT up reply actions  

strange

Hollinger’s own playoff odds, as well as the coolstandings and Justin Kubatko odds, give NO, Utah and Denver better chances to miss the playoffs than the Blazers. Not sure what Hollinger was looking at in writing that.

Hollinger gives us a 97.8% shot at the playoffs (4th highest in the West after LA/SA/Hou) and projects us to finish in a 4 way tie with Denver, Utah and New Orleans at 51 wins. Unfortunately, with our tiebreaker situation, that would probobly give us the 7 seed. Sure would be interesting though.

by jksnake99 on Mar 10, 2009 12:40 PM PDT up reply actions  

7th seed would be the WORST

as I think San Antonio is the toughest draw that would could get for a first round matchup… not that SA is better than the Lakers, per se, but after last night’s game I am so confident that the Blazers will be fired up to play the Lakers that I’d rather end up with the 8 seed than the 7 right now…

by c'est bon on Mar 10, 2009 2:31 PM PDT up reply actions  

I'm confused....

Not by what you guys are saying, but by two of Hollinger’s numbers. I saw that he has the Blazers with a 4.7% chance of being the 9th seed and out of the playoffs. He also has them as having a 97.8% chance of making the playoffs.

Since those two positions are an either-or situation, shouldn’t the percentages add up to 100%?

by antediluvian on Mar 11, 2009 1:54 PM PDT up reply actions  

the 4.7% chance at missing the playoffs was from the previous day's (ie March 9th) projections

the 97.8% chance was from yesterday.

Today, the 11th, Hollinger gives us a 97.7% chance to make it and a 2.3% chance to finish 9th.

by jksnake99 on Mar 11, 2009 1:58 PM PDT up reply actions  

If we lose 15 more games

we would be 45-37.

When I rule the world, everyone will know how to use Excel.

by jscot on Mar 3, 2009 10:16 PM PST up reply actions  

oops

you are right, it is Phoenix that would be at 41 wins

by trk on Mar 3, 2009 10:48 PM PST up reply actions  

Interesting

Want more aggressiveness? Try less Baylesslessness.

by prezofdeath on Mar 3, 2009 9:39 PM PST reply actions  

Magic numbers are a great

band, Give them a listen.

Its too early to be talking magic numbers but

the 15 losses in a row scenario described above is absolutely correct.

The magic number is calculated as G + 1 − WA − LB, where

    * G is the total number of games in the season
    * WA is the number of wins that Team A has in the season
    * LB is the number of losses that Team B has in the season
    * PA Popovich Arguments
 
with multiple teams it gets a little more complicated, but we have only one team to beat and that is Pheonix..

and this one

O+G+A+A+T = ‘One Game at a Time’

by mschofer on Mar 3, 2009 10:17 PM PST reply actions  

18 to 23 wins... One Game at a time...

The good news is that Portland hasn’t gotten on a long streak yet this season… That is threatening the league to get on a streak and be the “Hottest” team going into the playoffs.

One Game at a Time!

by Portland Dynasty on Mar 5, 2009 12:23 PM PST up reply actions  

We will make the playoffs. Why?

Because that’s what Nate said the plan was at the beginning of the season.

Karma

by Sabonis4Ever on Mar 3, 2009 10:38 PM PST reply actions  

yeh, where the rip did that thing go?

I was gonna ask him about it the other day. He must have thought it would be bad karma or something to leave it up…

Want more aggressiveness? Try less Baylesslessness.

by prezofdeath on Mar 4, 2009 12:01 AM PST up reply actions  

Oh yeah

Funny, I think Rasheed will turn out to have been right…

by TimG on Mar 4, 2009 1:56 AM PST up reply actions  

More importantly

we will make the playoffs because I said we would.

When I rule the world, everyone will know how to use Excel.

by jscot on Mar 4, 2009 2:03 AM PST up reply actions  

don't like numbers but found this useful...for the time being.

rec.

The Faith don't panic, the faith freaks out burns out farms and torchs small villages in the name of The Faith.

by faith on Mar 4, 2009 7:29 AM PST reply actions  

Since you're talking scenarios so far from the end of the season, here's one...

If Phoenix wins their next four, and we lose our next four …. you won’t be discussing magic numbers for awhile.

by blazerwizard on Mar 4, 2009 8:32 AM PST reply actions  

Haha, yea but that's highly unlikely.

at Heat
at Rockets
at Spurs
vs Mavs
vs Cavs

They’ll be lucky to win two of those games

by Rudy4three on Mar 4, 2009 9:01 AM PST up reply actions  

Agreed,

and that’s why the real question is not the magic number of reaching the playoffs, but two others: (1) finishing in the top 7 and not having to face the Lakers in the playoffs, and (2) finishing in the top 4 and getting home-court advantage in round one.

by blazerwizard on Mar 4, 2009 9:40 AM PST up reply actions  

E=MC squared

cause it will take a nuclear explosion to make that happen

"You're welcome friend
I love you."
- Tom "Dragline" inHawaii

by 92wastheyear on Mar 4, 2009 9:53 AM PST up reply actions  

The Laker's magic number to clinch

is eight. (83 – 49 Laker wins – 26 Phx losses).

The Laker’s number to be eliminated is 37 (83 – 12 – 34).

There is no charge for awesomeness. Or attractiveness.

by EngineerScotty on Mar 4, 2009 9:56 AM PST up reply actions  

We’ve got to do everything we can to finish 3rd in the conference.

It’s not out of reach.

GO
THE TEACHER ......come into my classroom "THE PAINT" for some tutelage.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"The rancor reflected in that remark I won't dignify with comment. But I'll address your general attitude of hopeless negativism." – Everett "O Brother, where art Thou?"

by Blazer1342 on Mar 5, 2009 6:00 AM PST up reply actions  

honestly, would rather face the lakers in rd 1

as opposed to the spurs. blazers are going to be full of p & v every time they play the purple & gold from here on out.

by c'est bon on Mar 10, 2009 2:34 PM PDT up reply actions  

the Lakers are much, much better than the Spurs

if the Blazers can’t get up for a playoff series, then they don’t have a pulse. SA is a much better matchup.

by jksnake99 on Mar 10, 2009 3:15 PM PDT up reply actions  

Dunno...

Lakers missed Bynum vs us last night a lot more than they’ve seemed to miss him recently. Especially once we get Oden back. Him and Billa should average about 20/25 between them against a Bynumless Lakers.

by Zaig on Mar 11, 2009 3:11 PM PDT up reply actions  

tought night

I have to root for both the Spurs and Rockets. Ugh.

Rule #1 of nitpicking is to get it right.

by douglast on Mar 4, 2009 1:42 PM PST reply actions  

That didn't go so well for you

When I rule the world, everyone will know how to use Excel.

by jscot on Mar 4, 2009 11:36 PM PST up reply actions  

I'm assuming you mean the magic number of clinching a better record then them.

That would be 83 – (our wins + Spurs losses) = 83 – (38 + 20) = 25.

There is no charge for awesomeness. Or attractiveness.

by EngineerScotty on Mar 5, 2009 2:16 PM PST up reply actions  

Yes.

I mean, “Aye!”

There is no charge for awesomeness. Or attractiveness.

by EngineerScotty on Mar 10, 2009 5:44 PM PDT up reply actions  

And a nerd, too.

There is no charge for awesomeness. Or attractiveness.

by EngineerScotty on Mar 10, 2009 5:44 PM PDT up reply actions  

cleveland is beating phoenix

i don’t like clev that much but i started rooting for them seeing shaq get special treatment from the refs on both ends of the court. he knocked varejao down as varejao went up for a close-in hook (no foul, varejao on floor), then soonafter did his lower-the-shoulder slam into ilgauskas knocking him backwards and scored close in (a charge, uncalled).

he can’t leave the league soon enough for me.

ignacio

by ignacio on Mar 12, 2009 10:29 PM PDT reply actions  

Kind of funny

That the GS tragic number is at 1 and they host Dallas tonight. They can assure themselves life for one more day with a victory! Go, Warriors!

When I rule the world, everyone will know how to use Excel.

by jscot on Mar 12, 2009 11:41 PM PDT reply actions  

Good job Warriors..

and good job blazers..

thanks for the update, EScotty

"Slum dunk? You just go to the rim, and crush.. crush the ball in the rim."
- Nic Batum

by idoltime on Mar 14, 2009 12:34 AM PDT reply actions  

Yeah

4 reasonably winnable games. I include Atlanta in that because they are at the start of the trip, and not at the end when we are tired. We’ve got injuries to some key players, though, it would really help to have Greg beasting on Horford like in the NCAA final, and if Rudy is out that hurts pretty badly, too. But it is still winnable.

But every game on the trip is dangerous — Milwaukee is good at home (ask Utah, Dallas, and Houston), so is Indiana (ask everyone), and Houston lost at Memphis when they were on a back to back, like we will be.

2-3 would be a decent trip, 3-2 would be excellent, and 4-1 would be phenomenal.

When I rule the world, everyone will know how to use Excel.

by jscot on Mar 14, 2009 2:05 AM PDT up reply actions  

DWade!
Utah at Miami. Hope D-Wade goes for 60.

Is 50 good enough?

by teenagemutantninjabayless on Mar 14, 2009 1:43 PM PDT reply actions  

I guess I'll take it.

At least for tonight, the Blazers are in first!

I have not yet begun to defile myself.

by EngineerScotty on Mar 14, 2009 2:13 PM PDT up reply actions  

Utah is hurting

They will be so tired in Orlando tomorrow, and that will probably make three tough losses in a row.

When I rule the world, everyone will know how to use Excel.

by jscot on Mar 14, 2009 2:50 PM PDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

The ultimate coverage and analysis of the Portland Trail Blazers.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Photo_3__small
JD 5/22
Bns_small
You're The GM. Whats your move?
Small
Hard to be a fan of a team that is so poorly managed.
Cs-sj_053_small
10 Years of 1st Round Blazer Draft Picks
Small
Draft Drawer: Pre-Lotto

Recent FanPosts

Small
Keep an Eye on Great Britain
Small
two options with $20 mill cap space, the #6 pick and some luck
Batum_small
Alternate 2012 Olympics Team
Small
Collective mock draft
Small
GM Poll: K Love or L Train
Small
Off season ideas
Small
Why we should Draft Damian Lillard
Small
The Art Of Drafting
Small
Chris Broussard Reporting LA Open to Shopping Pau---Pau to PDX?
Megayacht-octopus-plus-paul-allen_small
The NBA Draft Lottery Is More Than Just Luck

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

FanShots

Quick hits of video, photos, quotes, chats, links and lists that you find around the web.

Recommended FanShots

Assistant Michael Malone interested in the Blazers
The LeBron James Conundrum: A Legacy In Question
Shooting percentages as they apply to certain areas of the court.  Note who one of the best shooters in the NBA from the wing is.  Check out the guy dominating under the hoop as well.  Pretty impressive for a 6'9'' guy.
Fernandez: Joel Freeland Faces July 10 Deadline For Contract Buyout
Church of Basketball: An Interview With Dave

Recent FanShots

Ferry in mix for vacant Portland GM job
Where's The GM?
Orlando Magic has decided to trade Dwight Howard
If the Sixers are eliminated by the Boston Celtics in Game 7, the general...
Interesting Quotation from Chad Ford RE: Morway and Rebuilding
Malone is a winner...
Lamarcus aldridge first nba game
Shaq a legitimate candidate for Orlando GM job...

+ New FanShot All FanShots >


Editors

Kitten_small Dave

Headshotsmall_small Ben Golliver

Lead Moderators

Getfuzzy-satchel_small Timmay!

Bucky3_small Cablinasian

Authors

Plainlc_small Storyteller

Moderators

Lamb_small T Darkstar

Small douglast

Terryporter_small prezofdeath

Small usmcr3049

Lrg_magpie_small Corvid

Wallpaper_small geoffm