Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: NFL Players Ready To Welcome Gay Teammate

Game 69 Recap: Blazers 92, Cavaliers 97 (OT)

Boxscore

General Observations

All things considered, that was not a bad game at all.  If you're tempted to get down about the loss remember that we were without our two starting forwards, one of whom is an absolute linchpin to this teams' success.  We were on the road against a team with a 96.8% winning percentage at home.  We were facing arguably the best player in the game, or at least the League MVP this year.  We were playing on the second night of a road back-to-back.  All of this and we took the Cavaliers into overtime.  That, my friends, was a job well done regardless of the outcome.  It was almost an extremely special night.  At least we got a glimpse.

I thought we did a magnificent job against LeBron James...as well as could have been done.  The storyline for the game will start with The King's triple-double, but that ignores the fact that through three quarters we had him reeling.  In the first quarter he wasn't aggressive at all.  He was trying to get other teammates involved and likely they thought they could cruise a little against the Blazers tonight.  When their offense died on the vine he started to get more active.  But the Blazer game plan (and credit the coaches heavily with this) was to burn fouls every time he got in the paint.  Our centers clubbed him like they were playing Whack-a-Mole.  After a few of those he was staying out on the perimeter more.  Yes he got his foul shots, but Roy got just as many so they didn't kill us.  It wasn't until the fourth quarter and overtime that he really stepped up.  That's just when he needed to, of course, but I guarantee the Cavs' game plan didn't include a tight game down the stretch and an extra period.  We forced him to have to step up.  Our tired legs couldn't begin to handle his super mojo in the closing minutes, but whatever.  That's why he's LeBron.

I was also impressed by the way the Blazers manufactured offense in the closing period.  The Cavs were awake and alert, fully cognizant that they were in a real game by then.  Portland sported Roy and a bunch of guys you don't usually depend on to step up.  Yet Portland outscored Cleveland 29-21 in the fourth because they found the open man, got smart shots, and hit them.  You could almost hear the Cavs asking, "When does the part come where you start missing and we pull away?"  Not until overtime.  That was a playoff-like performance.

I really liked the defensive effort tonight, especially since it endured through almost every substitution we made.  I'm used to seeing guys like Frye, Fernandez, and Outlaw on the court and watching us give up streaks of points.  Didn't really happen tonight.  Loved that.

Except for a few lulls the Blazers did a great job on the boards.  It was a team rebounding effort.  Portland didn't turn the ball over.  The Blazers got foul shots and made them.  The Blazers got reasonable penetration via dribble and pass.  You just didn't see a ton of glaring weaknesses evidenced.

So what went wrong?  Besides LeBron, that is?  Mostly it was small incidents:  an offensive rebound given up, a ball lost at a critical time, a travel called, an ill-chosen shot, Brandon's foot sneaking over the three-point line before LeBron fouled him on that last offensive play in regulation.  They weren't repeated but when every possession is critical even isolated incidences add up.  The Cavaliers were getting the ball to LeBron.  Make or miss (and he did both) that was the percentage play.  The Blazers were just short of the percentage play on a half-dozen in the fourth and overtime.  Those made the difference.

Thinking systemically you'd point to the Cavaliers' 2 turnovers, tying an NBA record.  It's a rare game when one team commits only 8 TO's and gets blown out of the water in that category.  Our lack of turning them over allowed them to get up 10 more shots than we did which is a huge difference in a tight game.  The shooting percentages were close all the way around, they just had more opportunities.  Also Portland connected on only 5 of 18 threes, which continues to be an issue.  Travis, Rudy, and Brandon were a combined 3-12 from distance.  They had some good looks that just didn't fall.

Individual Observations

--Considering the Cavaliers were free to key heavily on him tonight you have to say Brandon had a great game.  He drew 11 foul shots and made every one, including the two that sent the game into extra innings.  He came within 2 points of matching LeBron's point production, scoring 24.  He had 7 rebounds and 7 assists.  He played 47 minutes.

--The Cavaliers decided to sacrifice the interior a little and leave the Blazer centers in the lane with single, or sometimes no, coverage.  Joel made them pay a little.  He hit a bunch of close-in shots with touch.  He also drew fouls.  He ended the night 4-4 from the field, 5-8 from the line, with 13 points and 11 rebounds.  He was responsible for a lot of good interior defense and for a couple clubbings of LeBron too.

--Channing Frye had a nice offensive night subbing for LaMarcus.  He shot 7-15 and had 14 points.  He had only 4 rebounds but you don't expect big boards from him against the Cleveland bigs who play a lot on the perimeter.  I thought he rotated appropriately for the most part.

--Travis Outlaw had 17 points on 7-18 shooting plus 7 rebounds.  He had a video-game dunk driving in from the sideline in the fourth.  He also got to test his defensive chops against LeBron and, while obviously not stopping or containing him, did a pretty good job.  I would say this was one of Travis' more successful starts.

--Steve Blake played a scrappy game with 5 rebounds, 7 assists, and 12 points on 5-10 shooting.  He was the only Blazer to hit more than one three-pointer tonight, going 2-4.  He only had 1 turnover.  He was aggressive off the dribble but late in the game he got a little dribble-happy.  Mick Foley once wrote in his autobiography that you only see wrestlers go for a sleeper hold anymore when they're thinking, "Oh crap!  I'm out of things to do!"  That's pretty much what you should interpret when you see a point guard furiously dribbling in and out of the same six feet of court for half of the shot clock.

--The bench rotation consisted of basically two people tonight and of the two Greg Oden was unquestionably the star.  He collected 5 fouls in 12 minutes but part of that was the Blazers' attempt to make Creamed LeBron every time he penetrated.  You don't want to be fouled by Oden much.  Here's the deal, though.  In those 12 minutes Greg got 9 rebounds plus a block and scored 7 points.  He was 5-8 from the line which bolstered his scoring even though his low post moves took a step back from what we were seeing when he was in normal form before the knee thing.  This game was a huge success for Greg, all things considered.  He gave us just what we needed. 

--Rudy Fernandez played 37 minutes and really did a much better job defensively than was the norm earlier in the year.  I like what I'm seeing from him lately...a little more control and attention on that end of the court.  He got 4 rebounds and 3 assists, both of which were pretty good.  But he was only 1-6 from the field, 1-4 from the arc, and drew no foul shots for a total of 3 points in those 37 minutes.  I just wanted him to hit an open three (well, more than the one he did).  The loss is NOT his fault, but perhaps you'll understand when I say that his production could have pushed us over the top tonight.

Final Thoughts

I just keep returning to my initial impression:  this game wasn't as spectacular results-wise as the previous two, but it was every bit as good in its own way.  The Blazers really are starting to round into playoff form.  If they can sustain it for another dozen games or so this will look like a really nice season.

Read Cavaliers-related analysis at FeartheSword. 

Figure out your Jersey Contest score and enter Saturday's game here. 

--Dave (blazersub@yahoo.com)

Comment 158 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Great game

Needed our two starters. It’s a loss but a well played one.

by Interested on Mar 19, 2009 11:53 PM PDT reply actions  

i stopped watching after brandon forced overtime

i was going to be happy no matter what.

"There are a few teams you have to watch out for in the fourth quarter."
"Yeah, but Portland definitely is not one of them."

-New Orleans Hornets broadcasters at the end of the third quarter with the Hornets leading 74-59. Portland later ends up winning 97-89.

"They don't mind him shooting that shot at all. Rudy Fernandez is not that great of a 3pt shooter."

-New Orleans Hornets broadcasters right after a Rudy Fernandez missed 3pter. Rudy Fernandez finished the game with three 3pters on six attempts.

by Tofu Anonymous on Mar 19, 2009 11:53 PM PDT reply actions  

that is discipline

but i know where you are coming from – at that point it is all icing and you know Lebron is bringing the heat.
I could have done the same thing except I just got home with 1:30 left in regulation so I needed a ’zers fix.

put a body on 'em

by RayBourque on Mar 20, 2009 12:49 AM PDT up reply actions  

I did the same because I was watching it on the DVR

and 90 seconds into the overtime is when the recording ended.

by MiledAnimal on Mar 20, 2009 10:17 AM PDT up reply actions  

30 minute buffer isn't enough!

Gotta add an hour to the end, take the hit to hard drive space, and hope for the best.

I also learned that the hard way.

Doesn’t help that TNT chat chat chat’s for like an hour before they start the game, it feels like.

by Timmay! on Mar 20, 2009 10:21 AM PDT up reply actions  

My daughter claims she did set the DVR to record an extra 30 minutes

but it didn’t work, obviously. I wasn’t mad about it much, since I get to watch about six Blazer games a year on the TV and this kind of thing happens as often as not. But yeah, now that you mention it, when I think about how much time the talking heads chewed at the start with their blather… Here I was all happy that Kenny Smith was out, but no, Chuck had to go on and on about Smith having a “yeast infection” as if it were actually funny. And no, Chuck, Webber wasn’t laughing at your wry sense of humor, he was laughing at what a moron you are.

Speaking of the Chuckster, am I the only one who thinks he is the worst “analyst” in the entire sports universe? His entire schtick is “being Chuck.” His opinions are outre yet vague; he obviously does no research on any of the players, teams, or games. I literally cringe every time he opens his orifice. He makes Nancy Pelosi and Barbara Boxer look like Audrey Hepburn and Catherine Deneuve.

by MiledAnimal on Mar 20, 2009 10:32 AM PDT up reply actions  

If probably did work

The game started at 5pm, and finished at 7:30 according to the guide. The overtime started around 8pm. So if you made it to the end of regulation, you did indeed have a 30-minute buffer added.

And yep, Chuck’s useless. He occasionally has a very frank, perceptive comment, but often of the blind-squirrel variety.

by Timmay! on Mar 20, 2009 10:35 AM PDT up reply actions  

Labron didn't even play till the last few minutes,

he was simply running his team through offensive drills, like practice, or scrimmage. Joel was great, but I was surprised we didn’t try and steal it by employing the twin towers when we were close at the end, maybe it’s too gimmicky.

What's the point?

by maid tu rek on Mar 19, 2009 11:53 PM PDT reply actions  

smart defenders (no offense Outlaw)

know not to give him the lane like that.

you are much better off forcing him to the baseline and hoping Joel or somebody comes over and helps

by cloudydays on Mar 20, 2009 1:28 AM PDT up reply actions  

Again?

Do we have to go down this road yet again?

Everyone knows what is going on with that. Neither of our backups has been playing well with any consistency, and Nate doesn’t have confidence in either of them right now in a game like this.

When I rule the world, everyone will know how to use Excel.

by jscot on Mar 19, 2009 11:58 PM PDT up reply actions  

I don't blame him...

both stunk tonight.

Sometimes I feel like I'm going in different directions...

by porterfan30 on Mar 20, 2009 12:24 AM PDT up reply actions  

Not to get into this again...

But Sergio did fine in his whopping 4 minutes. 1-2 shooting (3 pointer at buzzer), 2 dimes, no turnovers.

He did have 2 fouls though. One was a Bayless handcheck and I forget the other. He also had ONE play where he let Mo go right by him, Billa almost bailed him out on it, but no dice.

by Zaig on Mar 20, 2009 8:57 AM PDT up reply actions  

He had trouble staying in front of Mo

I don’t mean it negatively toward Sergio, just factual. Mo was too quick for him. I can’t remember if Bayless did any better though, Mo is playing really well.

Also, Sergio had one or two other passes for great looks that just didn’t fall. He is really effective as a set-up man, even without the ability to finish at the rim. If he ever fixes that, he could be dangerous.

by Timmay! on Mar 20, 2009 9:01 AM PDT up reply actions  

Yeah

He fouled Mo once on a drive and pulled a Bayless foul on Mo once up top. He also let Mo blow right by him once. Not the best defense on Mo. I also forget how Bayless did on him.

And yeah, Sergio had some passes that guys missed open shots on, but that’s the game. There is no stat for “could have been assists.” (Okay some nerd proly has this on his excel file, but I haven’t seen it.) He did finish 1-1 at the rim tonight, with a token missed full court shot to go with it.

by Zaig on Mar 20, 2009 9:10 AM PDT up reply actions  

It can't really be fixed

Finishing at the rim can be taught… if you have a vertical. Sergio is a horizontal player.

His best hope is to study tapes of Mo’s floater. That would make him dangerous.

Q: Is Greg favoring his knee?
Frye: He favors dunking on your head, that's what he favors.

by KP Corleone on Mar 20, 2009 10:01 AM PDT up reply actions  

I just thought Nate had finally decided on Bayless.

Thanks for not being a condescending. Normally I could see you stooping down to that sort of thing, but it’s nice to see you rise above the urge to say something patronizing. Good job.

by Nick Van Excellent on Mar 20, 2009 12:24 AM PDT up reply actions  

LOL

Well played.

Sorry, I just get tired of the great backup PG debate after great team performances. Carry on — I’ll just skip over it as I should have in the first place.

When I rule the world, everyone will know how to use Excel.

by jscot on Mar 20, 2009 12:30 AM PDT up reply actions  

It's cool.

I just haven’t been super up to date this past week because of finals. The one time I ask an uninformed (apparently) question I get jumped on because “Everyone knows what is going on with that”. When you rule the world you should try to be a benevolent dictator. I only ask because I care.

It was a terrific team performance BTW. Nice to see Frye reminding everyone that he’s not actually terrible.

by Nick Van Excellent on Mar 20, 2009 12:44 AM PDT up reply actions  

well played to both of you

this is why I love BE – respectful debate.

I think the question is completely fair: backup PG? Many answers in old posts but they all come down to neither are getting it done and short of signing someone off the street it ain’t happening this year. Given how JB is playing I’m somewhat surprised Nate is riding it out with Sergio though.

put a body on 'em

by RayBourque on Mar 20, 2009 12:53 AM PDT up reply actions  

I'm pretty sure we could bring peace to the middle east.

I wouldn’t know where to begin with the backup PG situation though. It would be nice to see one guy getting the minutes, but whatever, I’m not a coach and I don’t see them in practice every day so I’m definitely not qualified to tackle that decision.

It should be interesting to see what happens in the playoffs. Bayless looks a little jittery as it is. If the pressure gets any worse I’m worried he might contract hysterical blindness.

by Nick Van Excellent on Mar 20, 2009 1:04 AM PDT up reply actions  

We had about 348,000 comments

on the backup PG thing in the game recap thread after our great win in Indiana the night before.

That’s what pushed my button. It wasn’t you, it was the thread the night before, and it was just, “Oh, no, here we go again.”

Sorry, I should have gone to see if you were part of yesterday’s rampage before posting.

When I rule the world, everyone will know how to use Excel.

by jscot on Mar 20, 2009 8:47 AM PDT up reply actions  

Jscot?

More like Jerkscot.

Karma

by Sabonis4Ever on Mar 20, 2009 3:20 AM PDT up reply actions  

Who told?

When I rule the world, everyone will know how to use Excel.

by jscot on Mar 20, 2009 8:49 AM PDT up reply actions  

I think I was the first person to say rest the starters, and Nate proved my idea wrong.

A great game by the Blazers, even at full strength I would be happy to have seen the guys perform like this. I’m proud of the team and now it is time to use this game to catapult us into a winning streak, the time is now.

There won't be clean officiating in the NBA until David Stern is forcibly removed by the US Congress in 2013 for fixing games.

by 123_G.O._RipCity on Mar 20, 2009 12:22 AM PDT up reply actions  

I agree

It was a reasonable idea, but at this point in the season, I think Nate made the right decision even if it hadn’t worked. Since we came out with a really good performance, that really vindicates the decision.

When I rule the world, everyone will know how to use Excel.

by jscot on Mar 20, 2009 12:32 AM PDT up reply actions  

You made a long story short. A good one!

Sergio + Rudy = 16
Sergio + Bayless = 16
Batum 8+8=16

by amlmart1 on Mar 20, 2009 1:06 AM PDT up reply actions  

You neglected to mention the stat of the night

Cleveland had TWO turnovers. The entire game. That ties the NBA record… and one of the turnovers came in the final seconds of OT.

I can’t really fault the Blazers D, because the Blazers held the Cavs to a miserable shooting night. We don’t play the passing lanes much, and don’t force many steals—but still. Props to the Cavs for taking care of the ball.

I have not yet begun to defile myself.

by EngineerScotty on Mar 19, 2009 11:58 PM PDT reply actions  

urhm...

“Thinking systemically you’d point to the Cavaliers’ 2 turnovers, tying an NBA record. It’s a rare game when one team commits only 8 TO’s and gets blown out of the water in that category. Our lack of turning them over allowed them to get up 10 more shots than we did which is a huge difference in a tight game.”

"There are a few teams you have to watch out for in the fourth quarter."
"Yeah, but Portland definitely is not one of them."

-New Orleans Hornets broadcasters at the end of the third quarter with the Hornets leading 74-59. Portland later ends up winning 97-89.

"They don't mind him shooting that shot at all. Rudy Fernandez is not that great of a 3pt shooter."

-New Orleans Hornets broadcasters right after a Rudy Fernandez missed 3pter. Rudy Fernandez finished the game with three 3pters on six attempts.

by Tofu Anonymous on Mar 20, 2009 12:06 AM PDT up reply actions  

Doh

Obviously, its time for me to go to bed. :)

I have not yet begun to defile myself.

by EngineerScotty on Mar 20, 2009 12:08 AM PDT up reply actions  

both teams play at the slowest level too,

with a about 2 fewer possessions per game for the Blazers

What's the point?

by maid tu rek on Mar 20, 2009 12:19 AM PDT up reply actions  

Another step in the development of Brandon

Brandon took another development in his step to superduperstardom: He held his own against LeBron.

LeBron’s team won the game, and The King had a triple double (barely), whereas Brandon was a few dimes and boards short. LeBron won the matchup, such that it is…

But: Last time we played Cleveland (in Portland) it seems the entire Blazer lineup was in awe of James; not tonight.

Last year, when we played the Cavs, LeBron used Roy like the phone book. Not tonight.

Tonight, when LeBron guarded Roy on the final shot of regulation, Roy drew the foul against a guy who is a tough perimeter defender. That says two important things: 1) Roy is a clever enough player to get off that shot against focused, intense defense, and 2) Roy gets enough love from the referees to get that call against James, in Cleveland, with the game on the line. If Jarrett Jack, say, were to take that shot and get tapped by LeBron in the same fashion, it says here that the refs swallow the whistles and the cavs win in regulation. No disrespect to JJ1, of course.

fatty may get annoyed with me for harping on his theme, but Roy has passed yet another milestone. All he has left is “outplay LeBron”, and things are lookin real good.

I have not yet begun to defile myself.

by EngineerScotty on Mar 20, 2009 12:04 AM PDT reply actions  

that shot almost went in too.

that would’ve been huge.

"There are a few teams you have to watch out for in the fourth quarter."
"Yeah, but Portland definitely is not one of them."

-New Orleans Hornets broadcasters at the end of the third quarter with the Hornets leading 74-59. Portland later ends up winning 97-89.

"They don't mind him shooting that shot at all. Rudy Fernandez is not that great of a 3pt shooter."

-New Orleans Hornets broadcasters right after a Rudy Fernandez missed 3pter. Rudy Fernandez finished the game with three 3pters on six attempts.

by Tofu Anonymous on Mar 20, 2009 12:07 AM PDT up reply actions  

Something tells me if the shot goes in

then the whistle doesn’t blow… did the refs blow the whistle immediately, or wait for the ball to draw iron?

I have not yet begun to defile myself.

by EngineerScotty on Mar 20, 2009 12:08 AM PDT up reply actions  

Refs blew the whistle as the shot went up

I could check the DVR, but I’m sure. The whistle had gone off as I watched it float in the air.

by Timmay! on Mar 20, 2009 12:15 AM PDT up reply actions  

The Ref's Sucked!

Yes I know everyone can say that but the calls that were made or not made just a critical times show that Mr. Tim Donaghy was not alone. The traveling call on Travis simply was a way to ensure that King James wins again. I also would like to know how many wining teams played in Cleveland on the 2nd of a Back to back or worse 4 games in 5 days like the Blazer’s ? I bet when playoff time comes with more time off between games home court won’t be so advantageous. Great Game Trail Blazers on to the Bucks.

"The idea is not to block every shot. The idea is to make your opponent believe that you might block every shot." - Bill Russell

by NOWINE on Mar 20, 2009 12:18 AM PDT up reply actions  

It was clearly a travel.

If you want to criticize the officiating, try coming up with an example where they actually blew the call. Not one they got right.

I’m not going to criticize the ref’s, but did anyone get a good look at Jame’s block on Travis’ three attempt from the corner late in the 4th? TBS only showed one replay and that was from a poor angle to tell. But in live action it sure looked like he got a lot more than ball from the way Outlaw’s body reacted.

hakkaa päälle !

by timg56 on Mar 20, 2009 7:08 AM PDT up reply actions  

It looked like he got arm

Not a ton, but enough to turn that shot into a complete airball.

by Zaig on Mar 20, 2009 8:59 AM PDT up reply actions  

TNT's replay was useless

Even though I probably shouldn’t, I’m giving LBJ the benefit of the doubt. He covered a lot of ground and timed his jump well.

And I’d prefer to think we were beat straight-up, not due to the refs giving LBJ special treatment.

Ok, ok. Any extra special treatment over the normal amount.

by Timmay! on Mar 20, 2009 9:03 AM PDT up reply actions  

LBJ

hit Outlaws arm as the shot was released. Thats why the ball fell short and also why Trav’s arm jerked to the side. Call the damn foul!!

Man standing on toilet is high on pot.

by babar1 on Mar 20, 2009 10:19 AM PDT up reply actions  

Worse

I think if the shot had gone in the Refs would have called a non-shooting foul, which would not have been totally out of the question since Roy waited a while after contact to shoot.

There won't be clean officiating in the NBA until David Stern is forcibly removed by the US Congress in 2013 for fixing games.

by 123_G.O._RipCity on Mar 20, 2009 12:32 AM PDT up reply actions  

No way

Clearly a shooting foul, whistle blown well before the ball got to the rim, no question. Would’ve counted.

Q: Is Greg favoring his knee?
Frye: He favors dunking on your head, that's what he favors.

by KP Corleone on Mar 20, 2009 6:41 AM PDT up reply actions  

Great,

NOWINE complains about a call that the officials got right and you complain about one that never even happened.

hakkaa päälle !

by timg56 on Mar 20, 2009 7:09 AM PDT up reply actions  

Wow, 13 game thread comments at FeartheSword !

OT game and all….
I guess that’s who they designed this endlessly locking up trash chat thread software for.
I am so sick of Explorer lock ups of game threads, I pretty much have given up on any timely participation.

But, I am so far from “down about the loss”. Very impressive… I mean the Cavs have lost ONE home game all year, and we hardly played our best, with key people out.
Greg is already doing just fine… he is a key piece of our very intriguing playoff run. I don’t think any teams are going to be too comfortable drawing the Blazers in the playoffs, for good reason. This is fun time in Portland, fans !
Incidentally, the way Nate successfully handled that significant lineup shakeup due to injuries for this tough road game deserves recognition. Gotta be a confidence booster.

by Berkeley on Mar 20, 2009 12:18 AM PDT reply actions  

Upgrade to Firefox or Chrome

Internet Explorer sucks.

I have not yet begun to defile myself.

by EngineerScotty on Mar 20, 2009 12:24 AM PDT up reply actions  

Thanks for the tip, will give it a try...

was using it a while, had to reload computer, went to default.
Generally, good to get away from Microsoft, if for no other reason that it is the preferred malware target.

by Berkeley on Mar 20, 2009 12:31 AM PDT up reply actions  

Not that I encourage its use, but...

Microsoft also released IE8 today, with significant speed improvements.

I’m a Firefox guy. I may try using Chrome for BE gameday threads, while using FF to surf for everything else. Even with FF and a lot of memory, big games still bog the browser down.

by Timmay! on Mar 20, 2009 12:50 AM PDT up reply actions  

FF bogs just as bad as IE

When it is a big game, it is a world of hurt.

by DonkeyShins on Mar 20, 2009 9:56 AM PDT up reply actions  

Yeah BE can destroy any browser during a major game

I wonder if SBN is preparing for the likelihood of Blazer playoff games.

I almost want to ask if we can have three gameday threads, with your thread determined by the first letter of your username. But then I see the other usernames that start with a “T”… :)

Like I said earlier, I may try using Chrome for gameday threads, while using Firefox for everything else. At least the slowdown will be limited to just that window. Worth a shot.

by Timmay! on Mar 20, 2009 10:05 AM PDT up reply actions  

We are in the process of working on solutions for this

There are a couple hangups. Hopefully by the playoffs.

—Dave

by Dave on Mar 20, 2009 12:45 PM PDT up reply actions  

Great, thanks for the confirmation Dave!

I had a feeling you guys were prepping for the (increasingly!) inevitable. :)

BTW I’ve come to love the threading and auto-update system here. The browser slowdown on gamedays has been a worthy trade-off so far.

by Timmay! on Mar 20, 2009 12:58 PM PDT up reply actions  

Firefox completly changed the game thread expirence for me,

I don’t even use it at all any more. http://www.opera.com/ is nice too, really fast page loads.

What's the point?

by maid tu rek on Mar 20, 2009 12:28 AM PDT up reply actions  

I don't have much trouble all with Safari...

………………………… other than phantom posts every once in a while. To fix that you just have to quit the program and relaunch.

Pontiff of the Pryz for Prez Posse...

by timbo on Mar 20, 2009 7:42 AM PDT up reply actions  

LOL

I don’t have phantom posts. It is my brain that goes phantom.

When I rule the world, everyone will know how to use Excel.

by jscot on Mar 20, 2009 8:50 AM PDT up reply actions  

Crunch time calls

thought it was interesting that the 2 plays I was mad about were the same as the Blazers in the lockeroom after the game (oregonlive). The traveling call on Outlaw with 1:30 left… common traveling at that point in the game?!? And I though TO got hit on the wrist by LBJ on the 3 in the corner. Travis didn’t even look over to the refs though, good self-control there. Refs didn’t lose the game but dang those are crunch time

Sometimes I feel like I'm going in different directions...

by porterfan30 on Mar 20, 2009 12:32 AM PDT reply actions  

The traveling call was just terrible, the other call was legit

I’ll never understand how pump fake and then dribble gets called so often and yet running through the lane taking 4 steps gets a no call.

At first I didn’t like the no call on LBJ but after the replay it is obvious he got the ball, and some wrist. But in that situation it is the offensive players responsibility to get a wide open shot up without getting it blocked. A good no call

There won't be clean officiating in the NBA until David Stern is forcibly removed by the US Congress in 2013 for fixing games.

by 123_G.O._RipCity on Mar 20, 2009 12:36 AM PDT up reply actions  

I’ll never understand how pump fake and then dribble gets called so often and yet running through the lane taking 4 steps gets a no call.

Took the words out of my mouth.

Sometimes I think it’s because it’s the only play slow and obvious enough for even the referees to see it.

by Timmay! on Mar 20, 2009 12:53 AM PDT up reply actions  

The majority of the time I don't think it is a travel

As long as you haven’t used a pivot foot starting your drive to the hoop with your first foor is legit so long as you begin dribbling before you lift the second foot. That might not make as much sense typed out as it would if I could show you in person.

Seriously, the pump fake then drive gets called as a travel way too much in my opinion.

There won't be clean officiating in the NBA until David Stern is forcibly removed by the US Congress in 2013 for fixing games.

by 123_G.O._RipCity on Mar 20, 2009 1:10 AM PDT up reply actions  

foot* not foor

There won't be clean officiating in the NBA until David Stern is forcibly removed by the US Congress in 2013 for fixing games.

by 123_G.O._RipCity on Mar 20, 2009 1:10 AM PDT up reply actions  

No worries, I got where you were going there.

There’s definitely times it’s not a travel (Nic got rung up on a play that didn’t look close to a travel, a few games ago).

I’m generally frustrated at the NBA refs in a non-Blazer-specific way. Their inconsistency, lack of transparency, and inability (or unwillingness) to follow the rulebook to the letter can leave me fuming some days.

by Timmay! on Mar 20, 2009 1:22 AM PDT up reply actions  

I guess I was watching another game ....

…. because that looked like a travel to me.

Sure, it occasionally doesn’t get called and yes, more obviously blatant appearing travels don’t get called at times, but the simple fact is that Travis hurried the move and shuffled both feet. At least that’s how it looked to me. If it looked that way from more than 2,000 miles away, I’m pretty sure it also looked that way to the ref who was maybe 10 ft away.

hakkaa päälle !

by timg56 on Mar 20, 2009 7:15 AM PDT up reply actions  

Dude you're overreacting. Did you even READ my comments?

I called the Travis incident “slow and obvious” earlier in this thread, meaning I thought it was pretty clearly a travel. You don’t need to keep commenting repeating “uh-huh! He did too travel! you’re dumb!” even though I (and others) already said above that I thought he traveled.

My last comment was about what I thought was a non-travel called in Nic a few games ago. Unless you’re talking about that incident, you just took the time to write a comment to me, agreeing with my opinion, while being sarcastic and condescending in the process. Good work!

In fact, the bigger complaint isn’t that Travis was called for it, but instead that other people might NOT have. That’s the problem with current officiating.

by Timmay! on Mar 20, 2009 8:50 AM PDT up reply actions  

The thing is

They never called the slide step travel. A player takes one step and slides his second as he is going. It just doesn’t get called 95% of the time. When Mike and Mike comment on a player traveling, it is almost always this. People complain about how often Mike and Mike call travels, so this should tell you just how often players do this travel.

I’m fine with it since it’s not really a step, it’s just a guy getting going as he is dribbling, but if refs are going to call it, they need to call it all 10 times it happens, not just one TO with 1:30 left.

by Zaig on Mar 20, 2009 9:02 AM PDT up reply actions  

Yep, that's my problem

If you call that on Travis in crunch time against Cleveland, I want to see it on LBJ the other direction.

In the last two CLE victories, the refs gave them a 3-in-the-key, and a travel, in the closing seconds. Those are momentum calls, something that’s often ignored by the refs in similar situations on other players.

by Timmay! on Mar 20, 2009 9:05 AM PDT up reply actions  

The fact it never actually IS called

Explains why LBJ got so upset when the refs dared to call a travel on him in the clutch once this season.

I mean, he’s allowed to do that the rest of the time, so he couldn’t figure out why it wasn’t ok then.

And then the NBA didn’t fine him for explicitly calling out the refs afterward.

by Timmay! on Mar 20, 2009 9:07 AM PDT up reply actions  

I was looking for that as well.

Had he done it following the call on Travis, I was curious as to whether it would have been called.

Alas, no crab dribble.

hakkaa päälle !

by timg56 on Mar 20, 2009 11:21 AM PDT up reply actions  

Yeah.

I was sure he hit the arm until the replay.

by Nick Van Excellent on Mar 20, 2009 12:45 AM PDT up reply actions  

Maybe i didn't

watch the sam ereplays you guys did. I clearly saw Trav’s arm get his forcin ghis shot short and also jerking his arm to the side. . .Maybe i need some glasses or something.

Man standing on toilet is high on pot.

by babar1 on Mar 20, 2009 10:24 AM PDT up reply actions  

Oh I wish I was able to catch the game.

I was on the road I had to keep texting people for the scores.

I think considering a few people here were planning on us getting blown out and possibly pulling a popovich, it was a great game. I think we made a pretty good statement even though it was a loss. That statement being that we are for real and not someone you can take for granted.

"Every time Troutlaw touches the ball, I pop an anti-anxiety pill."

by DaNoose on Mar 20, 2009 1:11 AM PDT reply actions  

A few things (basically Roy-centric)

A) I love that Roy was going for the 3 at the end, even though Nate wanted him to drive. Shows that he’s fearless and he is very very confident in his ability to make that shot.

B) Roy looked every bit the player that LeBron is tonight.

C) I was very disappointed with the performance in overtime, why did Portland go away from Roy and Outlaw?

D)

“We need guys to step up, man, we need everybody to step up,” Roy said. “Right now is the most important time to do it, because the season is not going to get easier, it’s only going to get harder.”

Roy said that right after the loss in Atlanta. Since then Portland is 2-1 and the defense has improved immensely. Perhaps we are seeing the “next step” for Roy and his leadership?

E) ODEN looked great. I’m so happy with how he has performed since coming back from the injury.

F) We will be an extremely tough out in the playoffs, especially if we keep up the defensive intensity.

by cloudydays on Mar 20, 2009 1:38 AM PDT reply actions  

It's games like these that make me happy.

I’m pretty sure you can see the fire lately in games against contenders in the game. And I’m fairly confident that the playoffs are what we need to light a fire underneath us.

Only two of our players have playoff experience; Blake and Joel. Both solid players. I am surely expecting inspired and enthused performances from others that have yet to reach the post season. Not just in the last remaining stretch but in the playoffs as well. Roy will light things up as he surpasses another feat. LaMarcus will become another man reborn. Batum will be ready to take the pressure on. Outlaw will… not sure how he’ll take it, but he’s been in the league for 6 seasons, he’s going to have to step it up. Rudy will seize the competition. Greg will hopefully relax and feed off of the atmosphere.

I think that this team needs that extra step and will prove themselves with the opportunity. I’m happy that we are winning and not just making the playoffs by default. I hope our guys can study and learn other teams tricks in the playoffs, much like they will us, and capitalize on them. Go Blazers! Let’s destroy Milwaukee!

by dpnim on Mar 20, 2009 2:34 AM PDT reply actions  

I love the confidence that our guys will be better in the playoffs

But we may have a Lamar Odom on this team and not even know it yet. Thats one of the important things about seeing the roll players in the playoffs, who can step up to the challenge?

There won't be clean officiating in the NBA until David Stern is forcibly removed by the US Congress in 2013 for fixing games.

by 123_G.O._RipCity on Mar 20, 2009 4:40 AM PDT up reply actions  

I honestly thought before the game that we were going to win.

I even said it in the preview. The Blazers play to the level of their opponent. Tough loss.

Karma

by Sabonis4Ever on Mar 20, 2009 3:19 AM PDT reply actions  

Hate to be negative...

But this was more about the Cavs playing to the level of their opponent, not vice versa. Actually, the Cavs played below the level of their opponent, and if the Blazers were full strength (or played particularly well), they probably woulda stolen a win.

I thought both teams played poorly. There’s a difference between good defense and bad offense. This game was the latter.

Q: Is Greg favoring his knee?
Frye: He favors dunking on your head, that's what he favors.

by KP Corleone on Mar 20, 2009 6:44 AM PDT up reply actions  

Oden's more important than anyone on this team, minus Brandon Roy

Brandon and Oden need to be of of equal importance for us to reach our potential. Brandon, the star who carries the team on his back when needed, and Oden, the anchor underneath for great defense, rebounding, and easy points.

by Timmay! on Mar 20, 2009 8:55 AM PDT up reply actions  

he affects the game in an incredible way

I’m astonished at how he warps the game in our favor. More jumpers for the opponent, more inside play for us, offensive rebounding, efficient shooting…

Oden will be a dominant force in two years.

draft dejuan blair

by Cablinasian on Mar 20, 2009 10:19 AM PDT up reply actions  

It is so nice seeing people showing appreciation for Greg ...

like all of you, rather than the constant criticism some can’t help direct towards him.

hakkaa päälle !

by timg56 on Mar 20, 2009 11:23 AM PDT up reply actions  

Oden's fouls

— at least the first one and the two in the second half — were while trying to stop other people’s guys who had slipped their defenders. It would be nice if he didn’t pick up those fouls, but it wasn’t because of his own mistakes.

Sticking up for Travis Outlaw since 2008.

by Kaboomm on Mar 20, 2009 6:08 AM PDT reply actions  

One of the main reasons that we are getting better

This statistic from the daily dime on ESPN today:

 The Trail Blazers lost in Cleveland but they did have more free throw attempts than the Cavs, which extended Portland’s streak of consecutive games shooting more free throws than their opponent to 13, tying a franchise record set in November 1982. The Blazers’ streak also equals the 2008-09 NBA season high set by the Sixers (13 games,

This is huge! Jump shooting teams don’t do this. This more than anything else is very encouraging and hopefully a portend of great things to come.

"I saw him in the face" Sergio's quote on the latest alley-oop to Rudy.

by blazermaniac32 on Mar 20, 2009 6:37 AM PDT reply actions  

Wow--that's an encouraging development

"We don't back down to nobody." --Joel Przybilla

by hurryup09 on Mar 20, 2009 12:53 PM PDT up reply actions  

Kind of odd that this didn't happen in the 90's

But I guess any streak of 10 or more games on pretty much any statistic is pretty significant. Just guessing of course.

"I saw him in the face" Sergio's quote on the latest alley-oop to Rudy.

by blazermaniac32 on Mar 20, 2009 1:52 PM PDT up reply actions  

Blazers could've had that win...

I’m a fan of both the Cavs and the Blazers, and have seen most of their games this year.

I understand the general sentiment that you have to be happy going into the building of a team with one home loss and taking them to OT minus two starters.

I agree.

But at the same time, the Cavs did everything they could to giftwrap this game for Portland, up until overtime, and it really should’ve been a win for them. The Cavs have been trying every game for the past 5-6 to give one away, and nobody will take one. This was without question Cleveland’s worst/most disinterested home game of the season.

Until overtime, the Cavs were going to set an NBA record for lowest turnovers, with 1. It’s never happened before since they started tracking it in the 70’s. What’s that mean? It reflects an amazing lack of aggression. NOBODY for Cleveland wanted to do anything but hoist jumpers.

Part of the credit certainly goes to the Blazers coaching – the “foul Lebron so he doesn’t get in a rhythm” strategy worked. He was completely disinterested in the game until there were about 5:00 left.

Overall, pretty nice game considering LMA’s absence, but the Blazers really could’ve stolen this one.

Q: Is Greg favoring his knee?
Frye: He favors dunking on your head, that's what he favors.

by KP Corleone on Mar 20, 2009 6:53 AM PDT reply actions  

I like your optimism...

Better D than the Blazers usually play, for sure. But Cleveland’s offense is usually dictated by their (and particularly Lebron’s) energy level.

The Cavs were going through the motions, pure and simple. They have looked the same way for the past two weeks. That’s why they almost lost to the Clips, the Kings, and the Knicks. By “almost lost,” I mean, down 10+ in the fourth quarter (to the Clips and Kings), and within a couple points down the stretch at home against the lowly Knicks.

I’m sure the Clips and Kings and Knicks fans were encouraged by those results. I think the Blazer fans should expect more.

The result was a moral victory, but that doesn’t mean the Blazers actually played well. Both teams played poorly.

Q: Is Greg favoring his knee?
Frye: He favors dunking on your head, that's what he favors.

by KP Corleone on Mar 20, 2009 8:26 AM PDT up reply actions  

You give the Cavs too much credit and other teams not enough.

Basketball is often a zero-sum game. If one team is not playing well, it’s usually because the other team is keeping them from their comfort zone offensively and/or defensively. Saying that the Cavs were going through the motions implies that they were capable of blowing us out in that game and chose not to do so. In this game, Sheed was never more right: Both sides played hard.

by MiledAnimal on Mar 20, 2009 11:10 AM PDT up reply actions  

You really think so?

You’re romanticizing the game if you try to claim that “usually” when teams play poorly it’s because the other team played well. Sometimes it is. But not usually. The performance of a team (or lack thereof) may be caused by the other team playing well, or it may be caused by the team just not executing or putting forth enough effort.

If you’re getting open looks and just missing them, or settling for bad shots when you could get good shots, or not attacking the bucket because you don’t feel like you need to, that’s not the other team. That’s you. And lately, that’s been the Cavs.

Here’s the fact: the Cavs have played poorly for the past 5-6 games.

Here are the potential explanations:

1) The Kings, Clips, Knicks, and Blazers all played really well

2) The Cavs have been playing really poorly

Which is logically more likely to be the case? The statistical probability of the Kings, Clips, and Knicks all playing up to the level of a top three team? Or the top three team playing down to the level of those teams?

Q: Is Greg favoring his knee?
Frye: He favors dunking on your head, that's what he favors.

by KP Corleone on Mar 20, 2009 12:02 PM PDT up reply actions  

Confidence and momentum have a lot to do with it.

Those things go down for you when the other team is playing tough D and executing well. Plus, while no one is consistently at the top of his game, I don’t buy the argument that players dog it out there. Injuries, confusion, different teams, adjusting to players being in or out, emotional turmoil in a player’s personal life, etc. seem a lot more likely to me to account for lackluster play than players dogging it. And even bad teams have great games, and everyone gets-up for playing the top teams.

by MiledAnimal on Mar 20, 2009 12:40 PM PDT up reply actions  

The Blazers don't dog it...

But the Cavs (and some other teams) do. From time to time. Doesn’t make them bad people.

The 86 Celtics dogged it all the time. Why? They were bored. They blew people out. They didn’t feel like doing it all the time. They didn’t need to.

Earlier this season, by the all star break, Lebron didn’t play the fourth quarter in TEN of the Cavs games because they were such blowouts.

Now? The Cavs don’t feel like they need to bring it every night. They’re coasting. You think I’m wrong, watch a couple of their playoff games at home against Boston, and tell me if they’re approaching the game the same way.

Blazers caught them in super coast mode, taking the night off, and almost stole one. Not that the Blazers couldn’t play with Cleveland at the top of their game, necessarily – as the Blazers have shown against LA and SA, they can really roll when they get rolling. But this wasn’t one of those times. At all.

Q: Is Greg favoring his knee?
Frye: He favors dunking on your head, that's what he favors.

by KP Corleone on Mar 20, 2009 2:34 PM PDT up reply actions  

It wasn't out of lack of respect for Portland, by the way

The Cavs dogged it the other night against Orlando, too. They’re just not clicking right now. Part of that is a lack of effort, part of that is Big Ben being out, part of that is a lack of execution.

Q: Is Greg favoring his knee?
Frye: He favors dunking on your head, that's what he favors.

by KP Corleone on Mar 20, 2009 2:35 PM PDT up reply actions  

"Nice Game" from a drive by Cavs fan

I like your team…….Roy is money. What a sweet shot! In the first half Cleveland shot 31%, going 2/10 from the 3 point arch. Otherwise, you might have been down alot at halftime.

If the Cavs are minus LeBron, you win but sorry, I don’t think you can say, Roy “looked every bit the player that Lebron” is. James is making a statement this year and you saw it at the end of regulation and in OT. He will do whatever it takes for his team to win. I have seen every Cavs game this year and he has been beyond description in this regard.

Best of Luck the rest of the way……please do us a favor and knock off LA if you see them come playoff time.

Oh The People You Meet When Your Out of Ammo.........

by Juannieboy on Mar 20, 2009 7:06 AM PDT reply actions  

That's the plan (knocking off LA)

Roy looked like Lebron this game only, nobody here claims that Roy is the player Lebron is.

Also, if we’d hit our wide open 3s we’d a been up by more at halftime too. :-) You’re just lucky that Rudy isn’t back to his old self yet!

See yah in finals. (in a couple of years)

by Zaig on Mar 20, 2009 9:05 AM PDT up reply actions  

You might have noticed one of our three best three-point shooters was 0-3 at the half

otherwise you might have been down a lot more at halftime. Plus for the game, Rudy Roy and Outlaw, all nearly 38-39% shooters, went a combined 3-12. And good, open looks too

"its tough to play with one eye, unless you're a pirate." Delonte West
"una canasta a Pau en la cara" Rudy

by Honka Playboy on Mar 20, 2009 11:53 AM PDT up reply actions  

Agreed that Roy isn't LeBron; no one is

But Roy is a lot closer to the Annointed One than most folks suspect, and that’s all the Blazers need. With youngsters like LMA, GO, Rudy, & Outlaw getting better by the game, vets like Przy and Blake providing stability, and a near-LeBron leading the way, the Blazers are going to be very dangerous very soon.

"We don't back down to nobody." --Joel Przybilla

by hurryup09 on Mar 20, 2009 1:00 PM PDT up reply actions  

Am I the only one who'd take Roy over LeBron

I know that Roy will probably never be the player LeBron is right now, but his humility is exactly what makes his leadership so special. LeBron’s ego wouldn’t fit with our current team.

And of course, he’s a damn good player.

by Eventine on Mar 20, 2009 3:03 PM PDT up reply actions  

You're not alone: I'd join you in the Roy-over-LeBron club

But a club of two members is a pretty lonely place.

Seriously, LeBron’s talent is over the top, and he doesn’t seem to be a jerk. But I HATE that “supporting cast” talk that LeBron, Kobe, and their hero Michael Jordan all love to engage in. I want my team to be the one that BEATS the superstar with the enormous ego. I don’t want that guy on my team.

And here’s the good news: I truly believe that Roy’s Blazers are going to be just the team to beat the Lakers & Cavs. In so doing, they’ll remind the star-driven, over-hyped world of the NBA world of an inconvenient truth: basketball is a TEAM GAME.

Last night was just an early preview of that glorious occasion. The Blazers played the tortise to the Cavs hare. It was so classic: the dazzling hare coasting along, boasting and showing off, completely oblivious to the fact that the slow, plodding hare was still within striking distance. At the end, only Roy’s toe crossing the 3-point line as LeBron crashed into him prevented the Hare from pulling off the shocking upset.

That’s OK: the real morality play will occur during an NBA Finals, and it will be oh, so sweet.

"We don't back down to nobody." --Joel Przybilla

by hurryup09 on Mar 20, 2009 8:50 PM PDT up reply actions  

Geez, too many typos.

Of course, it was the TORTISE that almost pulled off the upset. And I had too many “worlds” in there as well…

"We don't back down to nobody." --Joel Przybilla

by hurryup09 on Mar 20, 2009 8:52 PM PDT up reply actions  

Proud of the guys, they showed they belong..and on nat'l TV no less

Yeah a win would’ve been great but the effort and the intensity and the passion were all there. Good enough for me.

Blazer Fan

by leeroyjenkins on Mar 20, 2009 7:09 AM PDT reply actions  

A few fans can complain all they want about Cleveland ....

…. being disinterested and offering this game up to Portland to take. But what I saw was a team that had just come off a game they could have easily lost by looking ahead to last night’s contest agains an opponent looking to revenge a last second loss, yet instead dominated, and come into the home arena of the team with the best record in the NBA and only one home loss and take them to overtime.

A team missing their second best player and another starter, with two other players trying to work their way back from injury. A team playing on the second of a back to back which refused to quit in the 4th quarter when the Cav’s opened up an 8 point lead in a previously close game and looked to have put it away.

That, folks, tells me that this team is mentally tougher than a lot of people give them credit for and than should reasonably be expected for a team this young. (Side note: I’m thinking that this might be some Nate McMillan rubbing off on them. You know, as in the coach rreally does know what he’s doing and we are starting to see the results.)

When you combine our talent with this emerging toughness and good coaching what you get is a team that very well could win a first round playoff series. I think it was Dave who commented yesterday on how the coaching staff has done a pretty good job preparing the team in rematch games when they’ve made mistakes the first time around. I know I sure would not want to draw Portland in the first round if I’m one of the other p[layoff teams.

hakkaa päälle !

by timg56 on Mar 20, 2009 7:32 AM PDT reply actions  

They fought hard

and didn’t quit but didn’t have any gas left for the OT.

I wish Nate would have put greg in. Those guys were exhausted and I honestly think fresh legs would have helped.

The goal is not to be better, the goal is to be the best.

by ratbastird on Mar 20, 2009 8:05 AM PDT reply actions  

oh yeah

and i was proud of hte blazers last night. A little more and we could have had it. We fought back so short handed. If nothing else, this just reinforces the idea that NO one in the league can stop us (except maybe the mavs, but lets talk when we play them with Greg at center and 95% healthy/100% in shape.

The goal is not to be better, the goal is to be the best.

by ratbastird on Mar 20, 2009 8:06 AM PDT up reply actions  

With two of three Mavs losses

we had key injuries.

Blake was out of the second one, which was reasonably close.

Greg and Rudy were both out of the third one, and it was still close.

When I rule the world, everyone will know how to use Excel.

by jscot on Mar 20, 2009 8:56 AM PDT up reply actions  

Sorry if I'm saying something thats already been said before

buy I didn’t feel like reading every single comment. I tried…

Anyways, Oden had a great game tonight. He made me proud I must say. Also, as soon as Nate called bayless onto the floor I said to my tv “Please leave your rookieness on the bench Jbay” what can I say? He’s been showing his inexperience. Of course, games like this are when you get that experiecnce so I suppose its a double edged sword.

On to the next game… GO BLAZERS!!

I Blazersedge daily, nightly and ever so rightly.

by Claire on Mar 20, 2009 8:28 AM PDT reply actions  

I don't know about great, but . . .

      you could tell his post game was hurried and was rusty.
 At least he’ll have some games to get reacclimated, if healthy.

  • (Fingers crossed)
          Keep working Big guy !!!

      COINCAST STILL _ _ _ _ _ !!! GO BLAZERS !!!!

It's GO time !

by walkoff41 on Mar 20, 2009 2:38 PM PDT up reply actions  

Biggest thing about this game. (IMO)

We proved we can play on the road. We didn’t win obviously, but we played on the road against the best home team in the NBA. We had injuries, but we took them to overtime.

This SHOULD build some confidence for Western Conference road games come playoff time.
“Guys we’re 1-1233211 against WC playoff teams.”
“Yeah, but that was the old us, the new us can take on Cleveland so we can take on anybody!”

by Zaig on Mar 20, 2009 9:07 AM PDT reply actions  

Shavlik

This seemed like it would have been a great night for Shavlik to get some burn. We could’ve used him on the offensive glass since we were taking a lot of outside shots and jumpers. He’s an energy guy, and he has played NBA minutes before with Philadelphia.

by MavetheGreat on Mar 20, 2009 9:45 AM PDT reply actions  

6 fouls to use too

Blazers win BDL 2 on 2 tournament!
Skeets: i’ll close it down now … congrats. you bastards

by 22baylor on Mar 20, 2009 1:37 PM PDT up reply actions  

I disagree about Rudy... Gibson hit a number of long shots on Rudy, where he wasn't on him

as tight as he should have been.. He also couldn’t hit a shot, and got a 5 second inbound penalty.. I didn’t want to see him on the floor at all last night down the stretch. They would have been better off with Frye in there

by Rudy4three on Mar 20, 2009 10:14 AM PDT reply actions  

Gibson hit 2 threes

And only one was because Rudy came off him way too soon.

This is what I mean when people talk about defense. They remember 1 or 2 glaring plays and decide it was a terrible defensive game for someone. All the stuff that DOESN’T happen because of someone’s defense goes unnoticed.

by Zaig on Mar 20, 2009 11:25 AM PDT up reply actions  

He also hit other jumpers right on or near the 3 point line. Anybody who thinks Rudy is playing

adequate defense, needs to go back and watch the tapes. Not to mention whenever he gets switched on to a player even remotely stronger, quicker, or bigger than him, it’s over… the guy just abuses him and gets into the paint

by Rudy4three on Mar 20, 2009 12:08 PM PDT up reply actions  

Is there a more universally liked and respected player than Roy?

Maybe Chris Paul… it seems like every fanbase just raves about Roy. Broadcasters love him. Players love him. Fans love him. Coaches love him.

I love him.

Anyway, I loved the game and the Blazer performance. Oden was bending the game in an appreciable way… there’s a reason Howard has taken the Magic to the record they have with Turkoglu and Lewis as their second and third options. Centers matter.

draft dejuan blair

by Cablinasian on Mar 20, 2009 10:23 AM PDT reply actions  

Watching LP this season has been a revelation

Every. Single. Announcing team. Cannot stop raving about Brandon Roy. Every away broadcast has a segment before the game, or conversation during the game, about how amazing this player is, how he’s often hidden or understated so he doesn’t get the attention he deserves, and my favorite… “He plays the game the right way”.

The NBA has no idea how to market Brandon, but the people who play, coach, and cover the NBA are fully aware that he’s a major star.

by Timmay! on Mar 20, 2009 10:30 AM PDT up reply actions  

I would like him a lot more in red and black.

Can’t we trade Sergio and Shavlik for him? Why doesn’t KP get this done?!

by MiledAnimal on Mar 20, 2009 11:15 AM PDT up reply actions  

Stop it! Just stop it!

It gives away what I’m doing at work when my co-workers hear me chuckle.

hakkaa päälle !

by timg56 on Mar 20, 2009 11:42 AM PDT up reply actions  

It's nice to know

We would have won this game. But how about Greg Oden giving the business last night? That’s the first time I’ve seen the Greg Portland needs.

Life is hilarious.

by SolGoode on Mar 20, 2009 10:59 AM PDT reply actions  

Nah

He didn’t get Lebron hard enough!

by Zaig on Mar 20, 2009 11:26 AM PDT up reply actions  

I have to say this......

Delonte West one of the most appearance challenged players in the history of the NBA.

2-4 the who

by 24thewho on Mar 20, 2009 12:33 PM PDT reply actions  

Nice re-cap, Dave

Like you, I was more encouraged than bummed by that loss. The Blazers are showing with every succeeding game that they belong. If things come together right, they could do some damage in the upcoming playoffs. And if that happens, next season the sky is the limit. The team is growing by leaps & bounds in every respect.

"We don't back down to nobody." --Joel Przybilla

by hurryup09 on Mar 20, 2009 1:05 PM PDT reply actions  

Let's not forget that Dave said the Blazers would win

and was close to being right. If only Brandon had kept his right foot back six inches when LeBron fouled him…!

by MiledAnimal on Mar 20, 2009 1:32 PM PDT reply actions  

Actually

I wouldn’t have claimed credit either way. I got this feeling at the beginning of the trip that we’d win in Cleveland but the LaMarcus injury took that all out of me and I feared we might get blown out of the water. Neither happened, so technically I was wrong both ways.

—Dave

by Dave on Mar 20, 2009 6:14 PM PDT up reply actions  

YOU sir have it !

       The scary part of the recap is the analogy to the “sleeper hold”
from Mick Foley’s book. Not the analogy, but that you actually read
a book written by Mick Foley ! If you like I can offer many alternatives.
How about; War & Peace, A Tale of Two Cities, The Book of Five Rings, etc.
         Sorry for the sarcasm, but M. Foley ???

It's GO time !

by walkoff41 on Mar 20, 2009 2:33 PM PDT reply actions  

Have a Nice Day is a really great book, a NY Times bestseller no less.

It’s not always necessary to read a serious novel to enjoy literature.

I enjoyed the reference. I almost commented that Sergio feels like the Blazers’ version of Al Snow.

Variety is the spice of life, including in literature.

by Timmay! on Mar 20, 2009 3:44 PM PDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

The ultimate coverage and analysis of the Portland Trail Blazers.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Photo_3__small
JD 5/22
Bns_small
You're The GM. Whats your move?
Small
Hard to be a fan of a team that is so poorly managed.
Cs-sj_053_small
10 Years of 1st Round Blazer Draft Picks
Small
Draft Drawer: Pre-Lotto

Recent FanPosts

Batum_small
Alternate 2012 Olympics Team
Small
Collective mock draft
Small
GM Poll: K Love or L Train
Small
Off season ideas
Small
Why we should Draft Damian Lillard
Small
The Art Of Drafting
Small
Chris Broussard Reporting LA Open to Shopping Pau---Pau to PDX?
Megayacht-octopus-plus-paul-allen_small
The NBA Draft Lottery Is More Than Just Luck
Small
Would you trade LMA for picks (with poll)
Small
Availability drawer: trade drawer

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

FanShots

Quick hits of video, photos, quotes, chats, links and lists that you find around the web.

Recommended FanShots

Assistant Michael Malone interested in the Blazers
The LeBron James Conundrum: A Legacy In Question
Shooting percentages as they apply to certain areas of the court.  Note who one of the best shooters in the NBA from the wing is.  Check out the guy dominating under the hoop as well.  Pretty impressive for a 6'9'' guy.
Fernandez: Joel Freeland Faces July 10 Deadline For Contract Buyout
Church of Basketball: An Interview With Dave

Recent FanShots

Ferry in mix for vacant Portland GM job
Where's The GM?
Orlando Magic has decided to trade Dwight Howard
If the Sixers are eliminated by the Boston Celtics in Game 7, the general...
Interesting Quotation from Chad Ford RE: Morway and Rebuilding
Malone is a winner...
Lamarcus aldridge first nba game
Shaq a legitimate candidate for Orlando GM job...

+ New FanShot All FanShots >


Editors

Kitten_small Dave

Headshotsmall_small Ben Golliver

Lead Moderators

Getfuzzy-satchel_small Timmay!

Bucky3_small Cablinasian

Authors

Plainlc_small Storyteller

Moderators

Lamb_small T Darkstar

Small douglast

Terryporter_small prezofdeath

Small usmcr3049

Lrg_magpie_small Corvid

Wallpaper_small geoffm