Game 65 Recap: Blazers 109, Nets 100
Was anyone worried when the Blazers entered the final period down six? Neither was I. As a wounded John Wayne said to pretty little Michele Carey in El Dorado, "Next time you shoot somebody, don't go near 'em till you're sure they're dead!" They hoped they had us. They didn't. A much-needed victory for the Blazers in their continuing playoff chase.
General Observations
Aside from a few memorable dunks, missed dunks, and enough blocked shots to fill a wheelbarrow the first three quarters of this contest were eminently forgettable from the Blazer point of view.
The Blazers weren't flat. They were actually moving pretty well. Nicolas Batum had some nice interior slices for slams off of the dribble or pass. Lamarcus Aldridge was running the floor early. Joel Przybilla had another 5-capper, his second straight. The interior defense overall was pretty good.
The big problem early was Brandon Roy not hitting anything but free throws. Though he attempted a ton of them (17 overall for the game) that was only about half the production we're used to seeing from him. With Roy's jumper not falling the Nets felt free to sag off a little which meant the lane got sticky for anyone who wanted to drive, post, or offensive rebound. They weren't exactly airtight inside but they looked a lot better than a team with Brook Lopez as their only intimidator should have. LaMarcus Aldridge kept us alive from the foul line while Nicolas Batum and Steve Blake did their job in the field, but we couldn't mount any sustained runs without Brandon. It was the team equivalent of trying to make shots with your off-hand. You can do it but it takes more concentration and will always be more shaky.
In the meantime Portland made just enough mistakes on defense to let the Nets stay comfortable. It wasn't a horrible effort by any means. But we had a few too many people going under screens on jump shooters, a couple times where people rotating inside didn't get back out to cover the distance bombers...that kind of thing. The Nets pretty much picked whichever defender was weakest and used his man to set screens for their guards, baiting us into switches or weak recoveries. They never extended their lead to a truly uncomfortable level but they didn't look threatened either.
Then came the fourth quarter.
Brandon had already started tuning up the band in the third by hitting a couple of driving layups in the halfcourt. The baton raised for the whole orchestra in the fourth. He hit jumpers, spinning layups, dipsy-doodles, step-backs, and some more free throws. All of a sudden that New Jersey defense didn't look so competent anymore. The floor opened up for everybody else. Now Outlaw's in the act. Now Batum and Blake are hitting threes. Now Nets Coach Lawrence Frank is getting frustrated and calling timeouts and subbing in bench players who can't make much of a difference. "Jarvis Hayes! Brandon Roy is on a roll! Go guard him!" Yeah. That's the equivalent of saying, "My cement mixer is rolling down that hill. Please go fetch it!"
The Blazers also tightened down the "D" in the fourth. They started swarming the main Jersey guys like 45-year olds after Bon Jovi's hotel key. They lived with Keyon Dooling, Bobby Simmons, Hayes, and even Brook Lopez taking shots single-covered (or barely covered). The odds were with them. They made Carter and Harris work for everything they got.
Portland also got control of the boards on both ends late. That was the icing on the cake.
It took a couple runs but in the end this offense-defense combination brought the Blazers home. It wasn't a textbook win but it was plenty good enough.
In many ways this game was a carbon copy of the one played in New Jersey, which the Blazers also won. The Nets outshot Portland. They connected on 4 more field goals and 2 more threes. They didn't turn the ball over. But Portland ended up winning the rebounding battle and the Blazers absolutely creamed them at the free throw line. New Jersey ended up 20-23 on foul shots for the evening while Portland was 39-45. Even discounting the last-minute-catch-up free throws the Blazers still had an enormous advantage. Part of this was Portland's aggression and New Jersey's relatively soft interior. Another part was Portland simply not letting the Nets, outside of Lopez, penetrate far enough inside to draw fouls. Either way, it saved the Blazers' bacon.
I should comment here, too, that for those who argue that refs have bad games sometimes, this one was your proof. I don't believe they completely unbalanced the game nor do I believe they were more unfair to New Jersey than Portland. But they were committing all kinds of classic ref mistakes out there. They were anticipating calls instead of seeing them. Their definition of a viable infraction varied widely. They got confused on out-of-bounds decisions. It was pretty brutal. I imagine they'll be huddled in a little room explaining themselves to somebody tonight.
Individual Observations
--Brandon Roy scored 31 to lead all scorers but it was a dirty 31. He only shot 8-21 from the field, not connecting on a single shot in the first half. The plane got off the runway in the second half though and eventually he shot the opponent down. Nevertheless this will not go down as one of his great overall games. I've seen him play far better scoring 18. The sterling part of his evening was the 15-17 free throw stat. He had 2 rebounds and 3 assists.
--LaMarcus Aldridge had a couple of aggressive moves, a passel of free throws (11-12), and was plucking offensive rebounds like they were low-hanging peaches on a lazy afternoon (7 for the game). But his jumper was off--sometimes way off--and that's always an uncomfortable time for the team. He did run the floor well in the opening stanza. Every time he gets down the court ahead of his man it's a great thing for the Blazers. 19 points, 10 rebounds, 3 assists.
--Bonjour! Je m'appelle Nicolas Batum. Le slam! Le block! Un, deux, TROIS! Encore, s'il vous plait! Un, deux, TROIS! Où est ton père? C'est moi!!! HA HA HA!!! (That would be French for "I just kicked your butt! Now show me where to sign my autograph.") From the get-go tonight Nicolas Batum refused to be satisfied with the corner-jumper hang-around. He found the seams in the defense, caught the ball, and tried to dunk hard enough to make the rim say, "Ouch!" His inside game gave him confidence in his jumper and all of a sudden he was a madman, sparking the team by hitting from anywhere he got the ball. Plus he played the usual active defense and got 4 boards, a steal, and 2 blocks. He ended up 7-8 overall, perfect from the three-point arc and the foul line, for 20 points in 32 minutes. Nate could not leave him out tonight. Way to go, Monsieur Batum!
--Joel Przybilla had his hands full tonight not only guarding Brook Lopez but playing free safety against New Jersey's guards. As mentioned above he had 5 blocks. It's somewhat understandable that he only got 3 boards to go along with them. Getting 5 blocks against this team means you're chasing people, not boxing out.
--OK...so here's my theory. In that Indiana game Jarrett Jack sneezed on Steve Blake, expelling a puff of germs which imbued the usually-steady Blake with a serious case of Critical Turnoveritis. For the second game in a row Steve was chucking that ball away like a losing race ticket in the fourth quarter. He almost made me say a bad word at my TV and Steve Blake never makes me say bad words. He ended the night with 5 assists (including a couple beauties to cutters) but 4 turnovers. He did hit some critical threes and ended up with 15 points.
--Travis Outlaw's main contribution tonight was extra energy on the boards. He finished with 10, 8 defensive. He didn't have the semi-predicted huge offensive night against the Nets even though he spent much of his time at his native power forward position. Like LaMarcus, his shot wasn't falling. He was 4-10 overall, 4-6 from the line, for 13 points. He had some good defensive moments and some bad ones...averaging out to somewhat better than normal. But then again he wasn't tested sorely.
--Channing Frye took 8 shots in 8 minutes and combined with the guards to get on the wrong side of some picks, ensuring that he didn't get much of a look despite Joel Przybilla only playing 28 minutes tonight. He went 3-8 with 3 rebounds, a block, and 6 points.
--Jerryd Bayless got Sergio's spot in the first quarter, perhaps because of his one-man destruction of the Nets in the previous game in New Jersey. There was no repeat performance tonight. He had a couple of good defensive stands but that was about it. 11 minutes, 2 assists, 1 rebound, no points.
--Sergio Rodriguez got 5 minutes with 2 assists, 1 rebound, and 2 points. It wasn't that great of a run from him either.
Final Thoughts
41-24 is a 63% winning clip. Compared to anything we've experienced in the past few years that's astonishing. The best part is, it hasn't looked unusual for the Blazers. They've just gone out there and won that much. If they keep up this pace they'll be around 51-52 wins. I have a hunch that'll be hard to accomplish. But they really have set themselves up well. Right now the Phoenix Suns, in 9th place in the West, stand at 34-31. They'd have to win 13 of their last 17 to make it to 47 wins total. You know the deal with chickens and hatching and such, but if you squint a little you can begin to see a glimmer at the end of the tunnel about now.
Check out your Jersey Contest scores and enter Sunday's game here.
--Dave (blazersub@yahoo.com)
1 recs |
118 comments
|
Comments
Someone will mention it to ya
Might as well be me.
Saying “First” is only allowed on Gameday Threads. No other posts, either on the front page or the sidebar.
No one will be ultra mad about it, but it’s just how it be. Those of us who hate the “first” thing begrudgingly accept it for gameday threads so that people who get a kick out of it can get their kicks out of it. Just nowhere else.
Mortimer
by Mortimer on Mar 14, 2009 4:51 AM PDT up reply actions 2 recs
Is the new first
being the first to point out how lame first are,
or to be the first to point out that “this should really be a fanpost” ?
Either way it doesnt matter to me if people are in to firsting, to each their own.
I honestly don't mind their liking to be 'first'
But I really don’t think it should be in every post. That is really lame to make everyone else “enjoy” it as well.
The firsters wouldn’t even get the bone they’re thrown to allow it in Game Day threads at most websites, I don’t see why it should be tolerated any further.
I consider myself far from the Blazers Edge board police, but “first” crosses a line and is like the poster kidnapped our mothers, murdered her, and then twittered how much fun it was. Or, something like that.
It’s just not something that should be in every thread. Even I gotta take a stand on this one.
Mortimer
by Mortimer on Mar 14, 2009 5:49 AM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
I thought you were the compassionate one, Mortimer!
Everybody should keep in mind that, for some of us, capturing the honor of “first” is one of the few bright spots in our otherwise dreary lives. Maybe we invested our life savings with Bernie Madoff, or our wife or husband ran off with our boss and took the dog, or maybe we are Cubs or Bills fans or our favorite Blazer was McBob.
Is it too much to ask that we might somehow enjoy this tiny ray of sunshine, this brief respite from harsh reality?
Doesn't it make it more special then
To keep the honor of calling “first” to one specific sort of thread?
It cheapens the honor to extend it to threads that are not game day threads.
I’m thinking of those who revel in the delights of firsting, is all. I know that if it becomes something for every thread, that hint of light out of the darkness every firster fan gets from saying first will be diminished, since it is no longer special.
We must take the pain of not being able to say first in non-Game Day threads to enjoy the sweetness that IS saying first in a gameday thread. Otherwise, we become as used to it as breathing or other daily drudgeries… and then it’s just another piece of harsh reality, with no more respite.
I’m doing this for all of you. I love you. If anyone is firsty, let them come to Me and drink.
Mortimer
I predicted 50 wins back in October
I’ll stick with that. They can win six or so more home games, and get a few on the road.
I loved Batum tonight. We are simply a better team with him on the floor. His defense and aggressiveness fire the team up… he and Bayless will form a dynamic combo in years to come.
I also like Bayless’ defense tonight. He did a pretty good job sticking to Harris… obviously, no one will shut him down, but Jerryd did a decent job of staying in front of him.
I miss Greg. I just watched the fourth quarter of the Toronto game… boy, we could use two centers right about now.
draft dejuan blair
Batum was amazing
Bayless didn’t show me anything more then Sergio did.
Stay Healthy.
Sign Nate Robinson RFA
Win Championship !
Batum was the best player on the court
He definitely earned the game ball tonight.
I feel nervous for Bayless when he's on court
But he is a rookie, I don’t care how tentative or awful he looks, he is still a rookie and should be given time.
by Se Hace La Vista Gorda on Mar 14, 2009 4:48 AM PDT up reply actions
Bayless did good defense on Harris
Harris is an extremely tough cover, and Bayless showed again his defensive potential.
The rest of his game was tentative and nervousnessy. It’s like he’s back to the beginning of the year.
Morty
50 wins? You're so wrong
I predicted 51 wins and that is so much more likely I could scream in your face until you pass away from old age, leaving behind a beautiful family, lovely home, and a dog. In your later years you’ll forget why I am screaming in your face but you’ll be so used to it you wouldn’t know what to do with yourself if I stopped. AND I WILL NOT STOP.
Mortimer
I'm pretty sure 61 was the true number
It can still happen.
Are you following me camera guy? That's why I don't do 360 dunks anymore.
prez and i called it 1/2 way through the 1st
we said that we wouldn’t have the lead until 6 minutes left in the 4th
by cloudydays on Mar 14, 2009 1:02 AM PDT reply actions 1 recs
How long has it been
since the Blazers have been predictable…except predictably bad?
It’s a new era.
—Dave
by Dave on Mar 14, 2009 1:04 AM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
predictable on the road against western conference playoff teams too
get behind early, get back into and pull within a possession or 2 late, and then collapse down the stretch….
nice cat btw
what's amazingly predictable is our fourth quarter performance at home
you said it perfectly at the beginning:
Was anyone worried when the Blazers entered the final period down six? Neither was I. As a wounded John Wayne said to pretty little Michele Carey in El Dorado, “Next time you shoot somebody, don’t go near ‘em till you’re sure they’re dead!”
if we’re within 5 or 6 at the start of the 4th quarter at home, you know we’re going to have a very decent chance of winning. It’s kind of fun.
BTW Kudos to Dave for that line
It is very evocative and it references my favorite western of all time. John Wayne, Robert Michum, (very young) James Caan, and Ed Asner. John Wayne was at his John Wayne-iest. There were a couple of these movies with almost the same plot…..Drunk Sherrif with crusty (trusty) ol’ sidekick. Young guy and John Wayne. This one was the best though. Sorta like a precurser to the Buddy films in the 80’s, only on horses. If you get a chance to see it on AMC or something, go for it.
Sheriff J. P. Harrah (Mitchum): “Who is he?”
Cole (Wayne): “Tell him your name, Mississippi.”
Mississippi (Caan): “[sighs and looks up] Alan Bourdillion Trehearne.”
Sheriff J. P. Harrah (Mitchum): “Well, no wonder he carries a knife.”
Classic!
"You're welcome friend
I love you."
- Tom "Dragline" inHawaii
by 92wastheyear on Mar 14, 2009 8:46 AM PDT up reply actions
Didn't Mississippi get lots of stink for his hat?
I haven’t seen that movie in a grip.
Are you following me camera guy? That's why I don't do 360 dunks anymore.
Yeh ..that weird kinda top hat deal
Also he couldn’t shoot (also why he carried a knife) so Cole (John Wayne) gets him a sawed off shot gun and the first time he trys to shoot with it, he hits a hanging sign instead of the guy he was aiming at, but it was ok because the sign fell down and hit the guy instead.
"You're welcome friend
I love you."
- Tom "Dragline" inHawaii
by 92wastheyear on Mar 14, 2009 9:05 PM PDT up reply actions
Amazing pessimism
in that final paragraph. Even for you, Dave. Just now, by squinting a little, you can see a glimmer at the end of the tunnel? LOL.
There’s full, broad daylight at the end of the tunnel. We only have to go 9-8 in our last 17 to hit 50 wins. Phoenix has to go 16-1 to match that.
Can the wheels come off before we reach the end of the tunnel? Yes, possibly. But it is fully in view, and shining brightly.
This team wins just about all the games they are supposed to, and enough of the other kind to rack up a very good record.
When I rule the world, everyone will know how to use Excel.
indeed
we are so near the end of the “making the playoffs” tunnel that its time to turn our focus into the next tunnel, namely avoiding the Lakers in the first round, while also not forgetting about the much more difficult to reach “homecourt in the first round” tunnel.
We got significant help on that from the Warriors
Dallas has to play at L.A. on Sunday as well.
If we can get even two wins on the road trip, we’ll still probably be in the top 7. Three wins would keep us in strong contention for a four seed, and force even Dave to take his blinders off and enjoy the sunshine.
When I rule the world, everyone will know how to use Excel.
This doesn't seem too productive.
Arguing about the relative wattage of light in a figurative allusion is odd. Just because I’m not going to jinx the team by declaring the playoffs a fait accompli with 17 games left, or if I choose to measure against the Suns by the lowest number of games I can conceive the Blazers winning at this point to make the point stronger by eliminating wiggle room…neither of these really call for this kind of response. Plus I can tell you that nobody in the locker room thinks the job is finished yet.
Would it feel better if I flat-out guaranteed without equivocation the Blazers would make the playoffs this, exact spring? I did…over two years ago. You can click on this link for another example of my rampant "pessimism", posted the day after the Blazers were officially eliminated from the playoffs last season:
http://www.blazersedge.com/2008/4/3/23230/09283
In any case, labels like "optimism" and "pessimism" pigeonhole and reduce people’s words instead of inviting and expanding conversation…let alone the "blinders" comment. If you go back to your original comment it is whole and just as cogent without everything before the words, "We only have to go 9-8". Why is that kind of stuff necessary towards me or anyone?
—Dave
Wow Dave, not like you.
So many here have developed personalities over time. You: calm, evenhanded, clever, insightful.
jscot: dedicated, positive, detailed, evenhanded.
All of us are sometimes inelegant in our sarcasm, but jscot has been respectful and supportive of you and the blog consistently enough to deserve a bit of slack, I think, as have you of course. You okay? We love you, we gotcher back. \
All is well.
Perfect practice makes perfect.
I certainly agree
that Jscot has been consistently dedicated, positive, detailed and evenhanded on this site. But I’d always noticed how he seemed to revel a bit in nit-picking several of the things that Dave posted. Considering the volume of Dave’s posts, it wouldn’t be a huge challenge each day to find something we could nitpick about if we looked hard enough. I’m wondering if this was just the straw that broke the camel’s back.
You know, I’m now sitting here thinking “twodeep, you have the nerve to be posting this as you’ve done the same thing”.
Not knocking Jscot; he may just be trying to encourage further dialog, but it is something I’ve observed.
Brandon Roy just destroyed everything in his path. There's your rational analysis -- Dave
Also: COMCAST SUCKS!
Not so much my back, really
I’ve been called MUCH worse things than a pessimist.
However I also keenly remember the second half of last year’s season when the optimist/pessimist thing got loose and seemingly every third post was someone applying one label or the other. I don’t particularly wish to revisit that.
It may well be sarcasm from Jscot and I’m not all that disturbed about him saying it in isolation, however I don’t want that kind of thing to spread66+5.
By the way
my kid is grabbing the mouse and hitting keys on my keyboard. That’s where the “66+5” comes from.
—Dave
I think you just started a new trend, Dave.
We’ll all be saying stuff like “Bayless put his head down and drove to the hoop but he was all 66+5 and got called for an offensive foul.”
"That’s where the "66+5" comes from."
Dave…you are being a pessimist again. 66+5 is obviously a message from the cosmos (via baby point guard) since this will be the precise number of wins(66+5=71 of course) that the Blazers will have in the 2010/2011 season. Quit bringing us down, man!!
"You're welcome friend
I love you."
- Tom "Dragline" inHawaii
by 92wastheyear on Mar 14, 2009 12:16 PM PDT up reply actions
As I re-read this
I realize the title line should have read, not JUST my back rather than what it reads. Yeah, it is kind of my back and I admit that. But I don’t usually comment on things that are just my back. It’s also because of the wider application and history on the site.
Maybe I’m putting too much thought into this. Just didn’t want people to think I was dodging.
—Dave
After meeting you in person
I totally think you could take jscot in one of those fights like in the middle of the Beat It video. Showin’ how funky strong is your fight. It doesn’t matter who’s wrong or right.
Are you following me camera guy? That's why I don't do 360 dunks anymore.
You can't let everyone think you're soft, Dave
Your only recourse is to ban Jscot finally. If not, everyone in the Junk Drawer will think you gone soft, vato!
Before you know it Benny Blanco will be shooting you in a train station when you least expect it and it’s all because you didn’t send a message with Jscot. I know you’re trying to go clean, but the rules of the blogosphere will haunt us always.
Mortimer
You are the Rufio of the Junk Drawer
Are you following me camera guy? That's why I don't do 360 dunks anymore.
And now for something completely different
Stop me if you’ve heard this one before …
The optimist exclaimed brightly, “Oh, this is the BEST of all possible worlds!”
The pessimist reflected for a moment, then added gloomily, “I suppose you’re right.”
If You Take A Look At The Western Conference Standings...
right now, you’ll notice Utah in 4th (41-24), New Orleans in 5th (41-23), and Portland in 6th (41-24). I know the season series record amongst these three teams make up for it. But I just think the standings between these teams is really funky looking in picture. How Hornets is 10.5 games back from the Lakers, and Utah is 11.0 games back, but yet they’re in the 4th seed, then you see us 11.0 games back in the 6th spot… Looks kind of puzzling at first doesn’t it???
"Here's Blake To Roy... This Is For The Win... YESSSS!!!!!!" - Marv Albert
Utah is #1 in the Northwest division right now
since they have the tiebreaker over us. Teams that win their division are automatically given a top 4 seed.
Thanx For Clarifying That For Me...
"Here's Blake To Roy... This Is For The Win... YESSSS!!!!!!" - Marv Albert
by pumping_iron22 on Mar 14, 2009 1:53 AM PDT up reply actions
I Just Noticed Utah Has A Better Conference Record Than Us...
Bummer! The best we can do is have a better overall record than them, coz tying the season series will just not cut it!!!
"Here's Blake To Roy... This Is For The Win... YESSSS!!!!!!" - Marv Albert
by pumping_iron22 on Mar 14, 2009 2:24 AM PDT up reply actions
No problem
We’ll just get a better overall record. They lost in Atlanta, so we should win there just to establish our superiority over them. From there on, it will all fall into place.
When I rule the world, everyone will know how to use Excel.
I Second That Motion!!!
"Here's Blake To Roy... This Is For The Win... YESSSS!!!!!!" - Marv Albert
by pumping_iron22 on Mar 14, 2009 2:29 AM PDT up reply actions
Hey
Anyone else notice that we’ve matched last year’s win total with 17 games to go?
I was just thinking that this morning.
Nice.
My favorite teams are the Blazers and any team that is playing the Lakers.
by OCBlazerFan1 on Mar 14, 2009 7:54 AM PDT up reply actions
Hello people... question.
I didnt get to see the game, saw Nic dropped 20 though and wanted to know if he actually got any late 4th quarter run for once.
he was [add intensifier of your choice here] insane
he was making massive blocks, hustle plays, and drained some HUGE shots.
the ONLY gaffe he had all night was a travel call, but other than that, he played dang near a perfect game in my book. He did have five fouls, but I don’t recall any horrible ones.
It honestly felt like Boom Boom could do no wrong
He was everywhere, a few more assists and it would have been even better. Confidence was the key.
Shoulder? We talkin’ ’bout shoulders?
by Se Hace La Vista Gorda on Mar 14, 2009 4:52 AM PDT up reply actions
Now....
does Nic sit when Webs comes back?
My favorite teams are the Blazers and any team that is playing the Lakers.
by OCBlazerFan1 on Mar 14, 2009 7:55 AM PDT up reply actions
When the WebSlinger comes back....
It will be a transitional thang. We will see if he brings what we thought he would bring, at the start o’ this Season. I would think Marty will be the Starter I was hopin’ for but we are talkin’ ‘bout alot o’ adjustin’ to line-up changes, late in the Season.
I think Marty will bring it! What ever role he plays will be an additional option on "D’ and "O" for our Balzers.
Elizabeth had a partner and he had a rap from the cops, Him and Lenny Suckerpunch were just out Tooling around
by Lizzy Lowblow on Mar 14, 2009 9:34 AM PDT up reply actions
I think this will be true...
…when G.O. comes back.
Elizabeth had a partner and he had a rap from the cops, Him and Lenny Suckerpunch were just out Tooling around
by Lizzy Lowblow on Mar 14, 2009 3:53 PM PDT up reply actions
it's funny to see how much better martell seems when he doesn't play
my dominant memory is how he would run from the ball, i.e. be afraid to shoot when we needed him or if he started off missing his first 2 or 3. 0-4? he was done for the night.
ignacio
but he's young enough, if he's got his mind right (while injured?)
he still has that beautiful shot
ignacio
Bayless did draw a foul
But how come no love for Batum’s blocks, beyond noting that he had two. Both were absolutely insane (one way above the rim, the other in the open court from behind!!!)
I think the fact that he got caught by Carter on the drive in the first place took away from the whole play.
But the hustle to take it away was great to see.
by Se Hace La Vista Gorda on Mar 14, 2009 4:53 AM PDT up reply actions
He is awesome at those blocks from behind.
They look a lot like T. Prince.
My favorite teams are the Blazers and any team that is playing the Lakers.
by OCBlazerFan1 on Mar 14, 2009 7:56 AM PDT up reply actions
I think they look a lil' bit better than that!
Elizabeth had a partner and he had a rap from the cops, Him and Lenny Suckerpunch were just out Tooling around
by Lizzy Lowblow on Mar 14, 2009 9:36 AM PDT up reply actions
Does Mike have to shave his head???
I heard a rumor that if Outlaw got to 10 rebounds he was going to shave his head….
Is this true?
This was awsome
They started swarming the main Jersey guys like 45-year olds after Bon Jovi’s hotel key.
Considering many call him a bust and injury prone and never amount to anything. If he plays one more game this regular season, he will have played one more game than any time in bynums career, the one non-playing year excepted. Yet NO ONE in LA complains about Bynum being injury prone, all they ever do is talk about how they can’t wait until he comes back.
I think some of it is that Portland remembers Bowie, and secondly that donkeys always REMIND us of that when they talk trash and it angers us that Oden cant prove them wrong until he is healthy. - GreatOden'sRaven
lol..at blake...
I think that we’re gonna take the good with the bad at this point…
on most championship teams don’t the pg average like 2 turnovers per game?
I dunno though…
thanks dave ;)
The Faith don't panic, the faith freaks out burns out farms and torchs small villages in the name of The Faith.
I was listening to the game on the Game today
and it was during the first quarter when NJ was shooting the lights out. Mike wheeler and his wing-man were talking about the fact that we were switching on most of the pics but that they knew for a fact that Nate was not calling for switches.
This is interesting that nate has informed the media that he isnt coaching them that way but the players either cant or dont respond.
That is interesting... Perhaps, now the media will hold the players accountable too?
I suppose this is what J. Quick already does…. it’s amazing how much non-players inform players.
by hotstuffdb22 on Mar 14, 2009 5:03 AM PDT up reply actions
I do that from my couch every gamenight with the amazing power of telepathy!
"It was White vs. Purple that's all I know." - B Roy
I hope Blakey gets his mind right
He really has had quite a few boner moments lately, which is totally the opposite reason for having a Steve Blake play 30 minutes a night.
LMA had his 4th double/double in a row. That’s gotta be a career high, both happily and sadly. I’m super glad to see him mostly forgo the jumper and get to the line. It’s no coincidence that his dunking, better rebounding, and more trips to the FT line all come at the same time. He’s getting stronger, which makes it easier to live on the block, which makes it easier to stay aggressive, which makes it easier to get to the line and get rebounding position and to finish inside.
LMA’s offensive rebounding (one of the best in the league) shows that he can rebound, and if you watch him on the defensive end he often has had trouble effectively boxing out opposing players— the wiry frame that helps him so offensive rebounding hurts him so rebounding on defense. He’s doing much better at that as well.
I also really love his perimeter defense, and his active hands and feet. He’s a better defender than given credit for, and will be able to cover a lot of ground with his length and quickness for years to come, ala Nene or so. Lotsa steals, good cover on switches, lotsa lank for teams to deal with. As he continues to add strength, his interior defense improves as well.
His jumper has been mostly off this season, but I really like the development in the rest of his game. I wish he went to the hookshot a lot more, since it’s instant cash money millionaires.
Yup… I like LMA. He’s becoming a power forward.
Mortimer
by Mortimer on Mar 14, 2009 5:03 AM PDT reply actions 1 recs
LMA
It seems like he decided last summer to model his game after the PF who bomb away from the outside rather than someone like Tim Duncan. I don’t think Aldridge will ever be as good as Duncan, but that’s ok.
I cringe every time LMA puts up a jumper. Why didn’t he post up Yi? Why doesn’t he feast on the smaller dudes? The Blazers need someone in the low post with Oden out and it certainly shouldn’t be Przy.
We needed LMA taking shots from the outside. Ofcourse he was supposed to make them, but the point is that he would have been able to draw the defense away from the paint, which would have freed up BRoy.
...
I think Portland needs someone
to make shots from the outside, but I’m not sure that it needs to be LMA.
Sheed-itis
That’s what LMA has. Which is too bad. I agree with you, he we would be a ton more valuable if he mixed up his offense better. He can do both (low post and jumpshots), so long as he recognizes when is the best opportunity. Hopefully he’ll grow into this. Unfortunately, it’s not looking encouraging right now.
Yeah, I'm not saying he shouldn't jumpers at all, but
he should mix it up like you said to make his game more effective. I think the book on him is that he’s going to shoot a lot of jumpers so his defenders don’t need to worry about him driving and can man up tightly to contest the shot. I think that explains why he needs to fade away. If he would drive maybe at least 40% of the time, he would force his defenders to respect the drive which would lead to more uncontested jumpers.
I would qualify your title to say he has current-Sheeditis. I would be happy if he had vintage-Sheeditis.
Yi can't play solid defense and fouled a lot of those jumpers.
Aldridge was more aggressive last night, but still not enough.
He can always get better
But the point is, he HAS been getting better and had some really good nights at the FT line to go along with his rebounding.
He’s also shooting the jumper less than last year now, because he’s got more go to moves inside than just the turnaround.
It’s a process. He keeps getting stronger, more confident, he’ll keep improving. His length and athleticism and work ethic make him not a finished project— though I don’t expect him to average 20/10 or whatever, I think 19/8 is very doable with solid defense and some big nights. You’re right he needs to stay aggressive, but I’m happy we’re starting to see it.
He’ll put the ball on the floor when he’s more comfortable with it. He’s a better ballhandler than before, but needs to work on that sort of move. He’ll get it.
Mortimer
Good points and perhaps I should be more positive.
Yes, LMA has gotten much better this season. I think part of the problem is that Portland’s plan falls apart in the second half. Often you’ll see Oden or LMA touch the ball nearly every time down the court in the first half and then not sniff the ball in the second. I blame Roy for that since he can be a bit of a selfish player in the second half and the fourth quarter in particular. I guess if you don’t think you’re going to touch the ball much then you’re going to bomb away as soon as you get it.
Anyhow, LMA should be able to have a complete game with inside and outside moves. I just wish he would punish the smaller dudes with the inside moves and pull the big dudes out. Yi is just beggin’ to be posted up.
yeah, in the 4th quarter brandon doesnt like to experiment
but lamarcus is asserting himself, growing up, inside and out
ignacio
So in the Jersey Contest answer page...
One of the questions was “Besides Roy and Aldridge, which Blazer scores the most points?”
Seven people picked Aldridge. Awesome.
I do believe in Greg, I do believe in Greg. I do I do I do I do I do believe in Greg.
hehe, Bumpity, Bumpity
Elizabeth had a partner and he had a rap from the cops, Him and Lenny Suckerpunch were just out Tooling around
by Lizzy Lowblow on Mar 14, 2009 9:39 AM PDT up reply actions
hehe, Bumpity, Bumpity
Elizabeth had a partner and he had a rap from the cops, Him and Lenny Suckerpunch were just out Tooling around
by Lizzy Lowblow on Mar 14, 2009 9:40 AM PDT up reply actions
Wow, didn't have the game in doubt?
I surely did. Especially with Brandon shooting like the way he was. I thought he was still experiencing that flu, so I figured he wouldn’t suddenly snap out of his slump (which he did).
i would like to see batum continue to get extra time
Nic is the type of difference maker sergio likey cannot be and bayless is not quite ready to be…
of course.. he’s also not quite the same on the road… still I think he should be a lock for 20 mins each game even if it means less time for 3 guard lineups
"Slum dunk? You just go to the rim, and crush.. crush the ball in the rim."
- Nic Batum
the time he will take will come mostly from rudy
and into the future this may cause somewhat of a squeeze
ignacio
So is Mike Rice going to shave his head now?
T-Law got his 10 boards.
My favorite teams are the Blazers and any team that is playing the Lakers.
On the local broadcast, Rice make it very clear that they didn't have that bet for THIS game.
Apparently Rice picks his spots.
I do believe in Greg, I do believe in Greg. I do I do I do I do I do believe in Greg.
Où est ton père? C’est moi!!!
Where is your dad? It’s me. I think a better expression would be Qui est ton pere? for who is your dad.
It was great to see Batum play well and get to stay on the court. That last “and” is crucial for his development. Earlier in the season Nate would pull Batum just when he started to get it going. Why? Shouldn’t your rotation maximize effectiveness on the court rather than some crazy system slaved to the clock? I was happy to see that Bayless and Sergio only netted about 16 minutes in total because neither did much. When Bayless came in, my first thought was “Touch foul on the perimeter” and I jinxed him into hand-checking Harris. I know a lot of you are high on Bayless, but I’ve been pretty disappointed. Maybe my expectations were too high since he’s a rookie, but I’ve seen a lot of energy, but a flat shot, bad court vision and not too much to get excited about defense.
Here's what Nic really said:
Since he is such a polite young man, on the several occasions in which he dunked on an opponent or vigorously blocked a shot, he inquired, “Comment va ton papa?”, then adding, “Donne-lui mes meilleurs salutations!” Autrement dit: “How’s your daddy? Give him my best regards!”
Batum was exausted with the limited time he was getting as is,
Nate would pull Batum to keep him as a viable option for more games, and to try and keep him off the “rookie wall”.
Superman wears Tyler Hansbrough underwear. - JTDuck22
The following exchange took place while watching the game:
Mike Rice: “You could just feel the energy level pick up with 6 minutes to go in the quarter.”
LaughingJon: “Duh, you could just see The Mantis enter the game with 6 minutes to go in the quarter.”
Spanish Main: The point of departure for enormous wealth in the form of gold, silver, gems, spices, hardwoods, hides, alley-oops, assists and three pointers.
Great game
best part: Nic’s shocked half smile when he hit that three late in the game.
Ball Don't Lie
Just call me Ruffin Tumble- Michael Ruffin.
He tried so hard to play it cool, and would have had the team not swarmed him.
Superman wears Tyler Hansbrough underwear. - JTDuck22
I'm actually happy he cracked one a bit.
And I loved that the team swarmed him. SO CUTE! lol
Ball Don't Lie
Just call me Ruffin Tumble- Michael Ruffin.
My observation - Batum is my homeboy
Play Batum more… When this kid consistently finds the seams in the defense, he is gonna be a force. You heard the MJ Scottie comment of Batum.. This is something we all saw, MJ didn’t have to tell us. The funny part is if his offense becomes the best part of his game, this kid will be a star in this league.. We already know his defense is the best on the team. He can guard anyone, or at least stay in front or make up with his long arms. Remember that 1rst San Antonio game at the beginning of the year, guarding Tony Parker on the last few possesions. This kid is gonna be good. Give him more minutes, not just to develop him but because he makes the team better now.
The team obviously values him, but I think there trying to not over do it with the minutes.
Nick admitted to be exausted at the allstar break, and that was with even less minutes then he’s getting with Rudy out of the rotation. The kids a baller for sure, keep him hungry and don’t where him out.
Superman wears Tyler Hansbrough underwear. - JTDuck22
i think nate has used him intelligently, possibly underused him in favor of rudy sometimes
but he’ll be the starter next year. i’m one of those who see him as pippenesque and you don’t use that sort of talent off the bench.
ignacio
the French
Ou = where
Qui = who
Ou est ton pere? = Where is your daddy?
Qui est ton pere? = Who’s your daddy?
You're lucky
I remembered that much!
However, loosely taken, “Where is your daddy?” could also work. Though the proper answer would probably be, “Right here!”
—Dave
His dad has passed on in a tragic manner when Nic was but a boy
Nic’s dad was a pro baller in France and died at the free throw line during a game of a heart attack-ack-ack-ack, despite Bully Joel’s warnings.
Don’t tell Nic I did a joke of that variety. He’s too young to understand who Billy Joel is.
Mortimer
The consolation is that .....(wait for it)
Only the Good Die Young
"You're welcome friend
I love you."
- Tom "Dragline" inHawaii
by 92wastheyear on Mar 14, 2009 9:11 PM PDT up reply actions
and on your final thought
83 minus Blazer wins minus Suns losses = magic number.
That’s down to 11 with 18 games left.
So we’re 41-24 now. We control our own fate. Get to 52-30 (11-7 remaining) and we’re in for sure no matter what Phoenix does.
I don’t want 8th place, though. I want 3rd.
I couldn't watch or listen to the game,
and I’m wondering if Batum was guarding VC alot, as VC didn’t seem to have a great game. (at least according to the box score).
Nic did have VC until VC fouled out.
There was a moment when Devin Harris was abusing his defender that Nic asked Nate from the court if Nate wanted him to switch onto Devin. Very impressive from a teenager. The flashes on the offensive lately seem to come more and more often. He may be a far more complete player already than we know, I get the feeling that he is deferential to his teammates to the point of holding back on O.
Perfect practice makes perfect.
Lets hope that Blake gets Chris Paul to sneeze on him soon. Also, I love that Aldridge dunks every thing around
the rim. That’s what the real stars do in this league, none of that soft stuff that Channing Frye does.
I didn't watch the game until today
Did any of you folks see when that usher or security guy gave Oden a piece of candy?
Are you following me camera guy? That's why I don't do 360 dunks anymore.
That wasn't a piece of candy...it was a special brownie
try to keep up
"You're welcome friend
I love you."
- Tom "Dragline" inHawaii
by 92wastheyear on Mar 14, 2009 9:12 PM PDT up reply actions

by 





















