Game 58 Recap: Blazers 102, 'Wolves 82
That was better.
General Observations
Two things were impressive about this game. First, you never got the sense that the Blazers were going to lose it, nor come close to losing it, nor come close to thinking about coming close to losing it. Tonight the Blazers and losing were as cozy as Jennifer Aniston and Angelina Jolie. That was appropriate given the level of competition and how they played. Second, even with giving losing the cold shoulder the Blazers played imperfectly in the first two quarters. You wondered if they were going to make this game harder than it should have been, what with the paucity of rebounds and free throws. Then in the second half we started dominating boards, scoring second-chance points, and getting to the line. The Mikes mentioned this on the TV broadcast: halftime adjustments are golden in this league. The Blazers made some nice ones tonight.
I suppose there was a third--or at least half of a third--impressive thing, which was even with the easy victory you didn't get a real sense of joy or accomplishment out of this win from the team. That seems counter-intuitive, but I think it's a good sign. A young team happy to be where they are would be smiling and high-fiving during and after a runaway victory like this, especially after having endured a couple of losses. The Blazers were matter-of-fact about it. They were into the game and appropriately congratulatory on good plays, but there was no sense of surprise or gratitude tonight. It almost seemed that they, like many of us, were not terribly happy that this game became important. It was all business, even from bench guys like Bayless and Frye who don't get a lot of opportunity to play and thus would be more prone to exuberance. That's the attitude of a veteran team that has its vision cast beyond one game and beyond the stat sheet as well. That's exactly what the Blazers will need in the last month and a half of the season.
I suspect we'll see a little more emotion when we beat the Spurs on Sunday. Tonight's demeanor, though, was wholly appropriate.
As far as the game itself, Mike Rice called it exactly correct when he said the key to this game was limiting Minnesota's shot attempts. They only attempted 67 field goals tonight. They average almost 84. When a team shoots as poorly as they do (43.3% tonight) that's a serious disadvantage. Nothing they could do was going to make up that difference.
Minnesota's three main frontcourt players (Love, Miller, Gomes) took 18 shots overall, hitting 9. Their starting backcourt took 20 shots, hitting 5. That's exactly as scripted in the pre-game plan. The Blazers did a pretty good job of forcing the ball out of the hands of their big guys. We were more than willing to live with anything that Foye and Telfair could do, particularly when the pair between them totaled 4 assists. You could not have wished for better.
The main area where Portland struggled tonight was the second-unit defense. The bench players scored but weren't able to protect the middle the same way the starters did. The Blazers also could have used more rebounding help for Joel Przybilla during the early quarters.
The Blazers' 50% shooting started with Brandon Roy brutalizing the ‘Wolves from the outset and then rolled from there. Minnesota had to be conscious of the middle and consistently rotated late to the shooters. The Blazers did fall into the jump-shooting trap in the middle quarters but they hit enough to stay ahead and then came out of it to finish the game strong. Portland also re-discovered its three-point shooting stroke. It's not surprising that the threes mostly fall when the rest of the offense is rolling because in reality we're not stocked with excellent pressure shooters. Rather we have a bunch of guys who don't miss when they're open. The rest of the offense clicking means more open shots on the perimeter. Our distance shooting bolsters wins but it won't earn us many on its own. Until Martell returns, maybe...
The other good stat, though expected against Minnesota, was 8 turnovers tonight and only 5 points given up off of them. We didn't let the ‘Wolves get cheap points.
This was just your basic, good win against an overmatched team. But that's not to be taken for granted even at this late stage in the season. Well done.
Individual Notes
--Yeah, B-Roy was all that tonight and a bag of chips. He turned in 19 points on 7-12 shooting with 5 assists. He probably could have had 30 had it been necessary. They couldn't stop him. He always seems to play well against Minnesota and I can't tell whether it's their defense or revenge.
--LaMarcus stayed too far out on the perimeter until the second half when he got jiggy in the lane a couple of times. That said, he and Joel kept Kevin Love to 2 points and 3 rebounds in 29 minutes. LaMarcus scored 15 points on 6-15 shooting and nabbed 10 rebounds. I told myself I'd give the man his "M" if he gave us double-digit rebounds 3 times in any 5 games and this did it, so there you go. LaMarvelous rebounding, sir.
--Joel Przybilla had only 4 points and 8 rebounds but he was probably on par with Roy as far as his value in this game. He was all over the place defensively. His 3 blocks were just the tip of the iceberg. He cleaned up a lot of leaked drives while still keeping the opposing interior players from scoring or rebounding on their offensive end. And this receiving relatively little help for most of the game. When you watch the pressure we put on Joel (and by extension on all of our centers) you start to understand why Greg Oden picks up so many fouls. It's amazing that Joel responds so well so often. We leave him out there to dry and he comes through anyway.
--Steve Blake also helped get us off to a good start with his offense and by setting guys up to score. He doesn't always get the assists but he knows how to get his teammates the ball where they can do something with it in the halfcourt. Neither of the backup point guards can do this well. Bayless hasn't mastered decisive passes other than off the drive and with Sergio it's either a dunk on the break or a three. 4-7 shooting, 9 points, 6 assists.
--Nicolas Batum was active on defense as always. 1-6 shooting, 2 points. He's starting to dribble a little more on offense, which is good.
--Rudy Fernandez was the scoring star off the bench tonight. This was one of his ultra-efficient outings with 18 points on 6-9 shooting, 3-6 from distance, with 3 free throws. He also had 4 rebounds and 3 assists. He is always dangerous when you're not tight on him and the Minnesota guards weren't tight in any sense of the word.
--Travis Outlaw had a sterling 6-10 night for 15 points but he also missed 5 of 7 free throws and had a couple of eye-searing gaffes defensively. He needs to score that many to stay above water. But he usually does and did tonight.
--Sergio Rodriguez was in a similar boat. He actually had quite the offensive night with 3-5 shooting overall, 2-2 from distance, and 4 free throws drawn for 12 points overall. I like how his personal offense has developed in the last couple months. I really like that "manhole" jumper in the lane where he pulls up short on the drive and cans it. That's going to be a valuable weapon for him against opponents who are shading him for the layup or pass. But the halfcourt offense stalled when he took over from Blake, saved only by a nice streak of three-point shooting (for which Sergio was partially responsible, as noted, much like a pitcher getting a couple of base hits to help his cause). Opponents are targeting him defensively still and it's working.
--Jerryd Bayless picked up some minutes partly because of Steve Blake's early foul trouble and partly because Sergio's set-up work wasn't fluid. He was a non-factor scoring but tallied 4 rebounds and 3 assists. He did a decent job of dealing with screens though he still got crossed a little. The part of his game that has improved most this year has been his weak-side and/or off-ball defense. He's recognizing what's going on out there more often. He shaded towards the play correctly a few times tonight, deterring drives or passes near his area. That's a good sign for those who are hoping he develops better court vision.
--Channing Frye had 12 minutes and hit 3-7 from the field for 6 points. He wasn't as active this game as he has been in the last couple.
--Shavlik Randolph had 5 minutes and he was quite active as always. I'm not sure about his ability to fill more minutes yet but he's rapidly becoming my favorite short-spurt player on the team. I love that the guy comes out hard every time. If he sticks around I believe he will become a solid fan favorite.
Final Thoughts
We saw once again tonight that Portland is an excellent team when you don't guard them. A wholly different test will come Sunday. That wouldn't be a critical loss, but it would be a darn important win.
Check out the muttering from the ‘Wolves at CanisHoopus. I noticed that some folks had a bee in their bonnets today because the author over there expressed hatred towards the Blazers and detailed why. Keep this in mind...there's no surer sign you're becoming a good team than the hatred of your fellow fans. List all of the teams you really, really dislike in this league. Whether your list is long or short, I guarantee Memphis is not on it. Newly-emerged marginal teams aren't hated, they're considered novel and cute and half-rooted for. When a team is good enough to get your goat repeatedly you start to hate them. Personally I look forward to the day when every fan from here to Botswana reviles us, curses our name, and casts aspersions upon us every day and twice on Sundays. Revel in it, folks.
Check out the Jersey Contest results and enter the next game right here. The announcement of the Jersey Contest winner is coming next, and what a doozy this month turned out to be.
--Dave (blazersub@yahoo.com)
90 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
The recap by the AP is wierd..
“In three seasons in the NBA, the Trail Blazers forward has been disappointing. But with his team in the running for a playoff berth, Roy is making a point to lead his team by doing more than scoring — even if it comes at the expense of his teammates’ feelings.”
Maybe, but it sounds like they are spending the big bucks on drugs...
Blazer's Edge Ambassador to The Dream Shake Blog
LMA Rocks and B-Rex ROARS!!
RRRRRRROOOOOOOWWWWWRRRRRRSSSSSS!!!!!!!!!!!!!
by LaMarvelous on Feb 27, 2009 10:01 PM PST up reply actions
Do you have a link to that article?
"Aneurysm".
When Outlaw wins a game on a last-second shot, it’s called an "annthefaneurysm". QualityPie
Well
they forgot the apostrophe between “Trail Blazers” and “forward”. They also used a dash without a concluding dash, which is sloppy. They did avoid the common mistake of writing “birth” for “berth”, that’s in their favor. However I don’t get the meaning of that second sentence. How does it figure that he’s hurting his teammates’ feelings by doing MORE than scoring? Wouldn’t that imply he was passing, hustling, rebounding, and playing defense? That usually makes teammates happy. In fact scoring is the thing that cheeses them off. Nobody likes a shooter and all that. I admit I’m confused.
—Dave
wow break it down
it’s like the upside down answer section of a ’What’s wrong with this Paragraph’ game
"Slum dunk? You just go to the rim, and crush.. crush the ball in the rim."
- Nic Batum
The next paragraph actually goes on to explain that he now getting in his teammates faces and calling them out
if he feels it’s needed. So Im assuming that is what they meant by “leading the team in a way other than scoring, even if it hurts their feelings”
Cool! Not only does breakdown the game, but he breaks down the competition too! DaveFTW!!!
Blazer's Edge Ambassador to The Dream Shake Blog
LMA Rocks and B-Rex ROARS!!
RRRRRRROOOOOOOWWWWWRRRRRRSSSSSS!!!!!!!!!!!!!
by LaMarvelous on Feb 27, 2009 10:03 PM PST up reply actions
Hmmm, not sure aboput the apostrophe....
Could it be argued they were saying he is a forward who is a Trailblazers rather than being a forward who belongs to the Trailblazers. Admittedly, they should probably have made Trailblazer singular, but even at that maybe they were just giving Roy his due in saying that, in essence, Roy is the Trailblazers.
Maybe I didn’t get enough sleep last night. Yes, that seems more likely.
"You are never (fanatically) dedicated to something you have complete confidence in." Robert Pirsig
Timberwolve fans hate us?
That is both funny and cute.
by Nick Van Excellent on Feb 27, 2009 9:19 PM PST reply actions
That's interesting...sort of.
Do you guys have some bad history between each other? I would understand if the other team dislikes you because one player from each team had a previous run-in, lots of trash talking, some sort of playoff history against each other within the last 5-10 years…From an objective viewer, Portland doesn’t really have anyone that I would call ‘annoying’ or ‘cancerous.’ Well…I suppose if you have to dislike another team….
This isn’t even in a case of a large market team going against a small market team ala ‘David vs Goliath’ thing…
we have roy, they have foye
thats enough right there
Man, we should forfeit before roy’s hammy explodes, knocking him into LMA’s ear who loses his balance and hits Greg’s knee… - HurraKane212
http://www.nba.com/news/miles_10_080919.html
Ricky Davis calld the Blazers cockroaches when he was a member of the Wolves
So…screw those guys.
Karma
by Sabonis4Ever on Feb 28, 2009 2:16 PM PST up reply actions
My memory might be wrong on this...
but I think the Blazers were the last team the Timberwolves ever beat back when they were an expansion team. If I am correct, maybe they still hold that grudge?
"You are never (fanatically) dedicated to something you have complete confidence in." Robert Pirsig
A win is a win
Obviously, this is a team we should beat, but it’s nice to see the guys take care of business.
An admission: After the OKC game, I said some things. Stupid things. Things about Nate not knowing how to coach GO. It was only then I realized that I was in danger of becoming that which I most loathe - an uninformed, knee jerk fan who reacts to wins with wild delusions of championships and losses with trade and firing fodder. I will not be that fan. From this point on I will support the Blazers, the coaches and front office wholeheartedly, offering praise and criticism appropriate to the matter at hand. I will never again be "that guy".
Blazeraddict
2/9/2009
Which knucklehead in the Wolves' organization
is trying to turn Mike Miller into a point guard? I read an article on TrueHoop about how he tries to pass more than shoot and didn’t really believe it until I saw it tonight. Minnesota will never win a game where Telfair shoots more than Miller.
Last time we played them
the T-Wolves announcers were talking about the “huge rivalry” that exists between Portland and Minnesota.
I literally started laughing out loud. No, I didn’t Roll On Floor Laughing. Just laughed out loud.
This is just a taste. As we ascend to the championship level, expect more hatred and “rivalries”
Want more aggressiveness? Try less Baylesslessness.
I imagine Laker Fan has the same reaction
whenever Blazer Fan or Warrior Fan or Jazz Fan or Clipper Fan or Hornet Fan or any West team Fan considers his team the chief rival of the Lakers.
by MiledAnimal on Feb 27, 2009 10:05 PM PST up reply actions
Blazers vs Wolves is not that competitive
We have won 9 of the last 11 games vs the Wolves. The Lakers haven’t won in Portland since 2005.
Karma
by Sabonis4Ever on Feb 28, 2009 10:48 AM PST up reply actions
I fear that will change soon.
Even if it doesn’t, that doesn’t make Portland-LA a great rivalry. Each team in a rivalry must bloody the other in meaningful games; that is, the playoffs, where we’ve been noticeably absent the last few years. If we face the Lakers in the playoffs this year and take a couple of games from them, that will be a nice start, but we’ll need to kick them to the curb in a seven-game series before they start to consider us a serious rival.
by MiledAnimal on Feb 28, 2009 12:42 PM PST up reply actions
Past history too
We’ve been off the boat for 5 years or so, but in the last decade we have had some epic battles with them. Sadly, these battles all went their way. It’s a lot easier to renew an 8 year old rivalry than to create a new one.
It's definitely more of a feud than a true rivalry
kind of like Yankees-Red Sox with less history. Hard to have a rivalry when one team consistently beats the other (as much as I hate to admit it) As far as I know, there’s only been two periods where both of us were good: early ‘90s with the Magic Lakers and the Drexler Blazers, and then late ’90s/early 2000s. I think the enmity didn’t truly get built up in our eyes until they eliminated us like 5 years in a row from ’99 to 2003. That was painful.
chicago? featuring artis gilmore, norm van lier and jerry sloan.
that’s my memory.
no, i guess you mean afterwards, when we stunned the l*kers with johnny davis and lionel hollins making their guards look old and slow. bill walton had that notable dunk over kareem.
ignacio
My bad, I wasn't alive.
back then. Most of my knowledge of the early Blazers years comes from Halberstam, which would have been incredible for Blazer fans if only he had written it a year or two earlier. Still fascinating, though.
Still, I stand by that it’s more like Yankees-Red Sox than, say, Celtics-Lakers. We’ve gotten a couple shots in, and I’ll irrationally despise the Lakers for as long as I live, but it’s pretty out of balance towards LA. As a Blazer fan, there’s no one I’d rather beat, but if I’m a Laker fan, I’d probably see us more like we see the Wolves. In the last 30 years, we’ve beaten LA in the playoffs twice (thanks to Clyde for that second one), compared to a whole lot of memories I don’t want to relive on their side, including something like a 10-0 active streak for them.
If I had to pick a single team as our rivals, I’d obviously say LA, but with a little different circumstances, I could’ve seen those early 2000 teams developing a healthy rivalry with Sacto or SA, also, we just happened to keep drawing LA in the playoffs.
Thanks and Whoo Hoooo for the shout, Dave!!!!!!
I told myself I’d give the man his “M” if he gave us double-digit rebounds 3 times in any 5 games and this did it, so there you go. LaMarvelous rebounding, sir.
I feel so special! :)
I wish that I could have been here to participate, but I was taking the family out for dinner so I just listened to it on the radio ( well most of it). If I interpreting this recap correctly it sounds like LMA was more than just a one trick pony (scoring) tonight.
Does this mean that he played some defense???? I sure hope so…
Blazer's Edge Ambassador to The Dream Shake Blog
LMA Rocks and B-Rex ROARS!!
RRRRRRROOOOOOOWWWWWRRRRRRSSSSSS!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Canis Stoopis
Reading that T-Wolves blog really makes me appreciate the team we have in our fine city. Just the phrase “hoping Bassy doesnt take too many 3’s” – makes me cringe.
I hate the Grizzlies.
But it’s mostly because they gave Pau Gasol to the Lakers.
by LicketyBrindle on Feb 27, 2009 10:03 PM PST reply actions
Oh, and Darius Miles
I understand that someone had to do it. But they did it
"its tough to play with one eye, unless you're a pirate." Delonte West
"una canasta a Pau en la cara" Rudy
by Honka Playboy on Feb 27, 2009 11:45 PM PST up reply actions
On CannisHoopus
They list our starting center as “V.G.”…what am I missing?
"Respect everyone, fear no one." -TP
Good one
+1
Elizabeth had a partner and he had a rap from the cops, Him and Lenny Suckerpunch were just out Tooling around
by Lizzy Lowblow on Feb 27, 2009 11:59 PM PST up reply actions
I have really broke down
I have no option to watch games. Listenin’ to ’em has become a chore also.
I am glad we won this one.
Too tired of tryin’, really. I will check the next Boxscore at my leisure.
Tired of tryin’ to keep up live -GAK
Elizabeth had a partner and he had a rap from the cops, Him and Lenny Suckerpunch were just out Tooling around
Greatest moment of the game
First, Joel Przybilla blocks a Minnesota dunk. Next Minnesota possession is a 2-on-1 fast break, which looks like an easy score. However, Joel is waiting in the paint and the Timberwolf with the ball actually stops his drive and pulls back to set up the halfcourt offense. “Don’t make me go up against the Gorilla again!”
Sticking up for Travis Outlaw since 2008.
Shavlik Randolph
Shavlik Randolph had 5 minutes and he was quite active as always. . . . If he sticks around I believe he will become a solid fan favorite.
If I remember right, the Blazers have to make a decision about re-signing Channing Frye this summer, right? I guess that decision isn’t just a question of Frye’s value — it comes down to whether the cap space is needed to bring in somebody else. So I was picturing next year’s team if they don’t keep Frye, and I feel like Randolph might be able to step in effectively as a backup PF. What do others think?
Sticking up for Travis Outlaw since 2008.
I'll take Frye
we had a good portion of last season to judge Frye. We don’t have much on Randolph. I see him as more frenetic than active. Maybe we’ll get a chance to see more.
Is his mid-range game as dependable as Frye’s has been (and I think will be)? That is an important part of the Blazer offense, the pick and pop
"its tough to play with one eye, unless you're a pirate." Delonte West
"una canasta a Pau en la cara" Rudy
by Honka Playboy on Feb 28, 2009 12:28 AM PST up reply actions
Agreed. There´s a plan for Shav. KP didn´t pick him up against Nate´s wish only to let him know who is in charge.
Sergio + Rudy = 16
Sergio + Bayless = 16
Batum 8+8=16
Agreed about Shavlik becoming a favorite ..
At the start of the season, I wasn’t sure that he was a better choice than Hill. And the last “Randolph” left a negative feel.
But I’ve come to really like Shavlik. It would be nice if somehow he fits in long term. Also hope he learns to fly better. On the road, he must end up more exhausted than any other Blazer .. even when he doesn’t play.
I don't think that 6-15 line from LaMarcus is good enough
It comes out as 40% which isn’t mind numbingly awesome but as a PF playing against the Wolves I’d like to see 8 or 9 out of 15 really. Other than that, good win.
He got blocked a couple times but got it back
And he missed at least one dunk that we rebounded.
Karma
by Sabonis4Ever on Feb 28, 2009 10:51 AM PST up reply actions
Regarding the CanisHoopus hate
When will Blazers fans realize that blogs like that and Bill Simmons are just writing that stuff to get hits. Feel free to read it, just don’t encourage them to write more crap like that by joining and commenting.
The think the worst part of the whole Miles debacle is that people like that guy from CanisHoopus now thinks Miles is a saint. I wonder how many bloggers are going to name their son “Darius” after their patron saint of blogger soapboxes.
I da man!
please link to the part where....
…I anoint St. Miles.
The World's Leading Exporter of Small Area Quickness
www.canishoopus.com
Sure
http://www.canishoopus.com/2009/2/27/774117/game-day-please-don-t-sue
fans booing Darius Miles because his comeback from a medical disaster
Miles was booed because he is a bunch of words I can’t say on Blazers Edge. The capspace junk was certainly part of the booing but not the only reason. I think it’s all been discussed enough so there is no point in debating it. It’s cool that you hate the Blazers. I hate OKC and Memphis and make no apologies for my hate.
I da man!
Are you serious?
If so, that’s delusional. They’re two completely separate issues: Miles being a punk and him being wronged on the employment front.
I’ll save you the time: at no point did we say that Miles was a saint.
The World's Leading Exporter of Small Area Quickness
www.canishoopus.com
I should warn you
that Dragline is never fully serious. Always take what he says with a pound of salt.
The fans booed Darius because he was a fan favorite who got hurt and spent two years forty pound overweight and not rehabbing.
Look at their traffic...
The fastest way to get some interest in your basketball-oriented website is to criticize the Blazers… We’re like the Flood from Halo except more emotional and relentless…
Anyways, my only point of contention is that they (or Stop-N-Go in particular) criticizes our devotion to Kevin Pritchard, and then tries to justify and support former GM Kevin McHale in the same paragraph. He talks about “luck” as being a factor of success in the NBA but doesn’t acknowledge that the ’Wolves were lucky to snag Garnett in the first place. Then, he says McHale established this winning philosophy by surrounding Garnett with perimeter players, but what exactly did they win?
McHale wasted the talents of one of the best players in NBA history for years… I don’t consider Wally Szcerbiak a viable second scoring option…And if you hate us because of the Darius Miles fiasco, should we name drop Joe Smith? At least our sketchy business practices are used in the best interests of our team (as opposed to the Smith debacle that handcuffed the franchise for years)…
Get excited about dueling undersized Power Forwards that don’t protect the rim, an undersized shooting guard that will forever live in the shadow of the Roy-for-Foye deal, and Corey Brewer if you want to, but me – well, I’ll take the Blazers 8 days a week.
PS… Thanks for Roy.
"Now, you take a bobcat or a Jayhawk. You know they'll run if you give 'em the chance. But when one don't run, why, you shoot him and shoot him quick. Raef's my dog, Pa. I've gotta do what's right..." Old Yeller (1957)
by RoyGoesTheDynamite on Feb 28, 2009 9:40 AM PST up reply actions
Thanks, but I'm serious on this one
I’m sick and tired of other fans making MIles out to be a victim because the Blazers didn’t want to get screwed over by a team signing him just to mess up capspace. There is no need to rehash the e-mail.
For a fan of another team to say Blazers fans booed Miles for the cap hit and not for calling the coach the n-word and saying he didn’t care if the team lost the next 20 games is either ignorant or a ploy to draw internet traffic from the Blazers large internet following.
http://www.usatoday.com/sports/basketball/nba/blazers/2005-01-28-miles_x.htm
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Darius_Miles
I da man!
Re Cablinasian's comment about you above
It’s starting to annoy me that several BEdgers feel the need to explain to guests that you should not be taken seriously. You clown a lot, but not always. I think you function pretty well without an interpreter.
by MiledAnimal on Feb 28, 2009 12:53 PM PST up reply actions
It's cool
I think all is fair on blogs when others enter each others turf. I didn’t mean to offend the OKC guy as much as I did, even though I really don’t like them.
I da man!
I'm glad you feel that way
because Stop-n-Pop cites your CanisHoopus Hate comment (scroll down below the Bobby Jindal photo to see it) as his all-time favorite Internet comment.
Sorry
the comment was out of place. I was quick to comment because some SBN blogger came over a few weeks ago and was mortified at one of Tom’s very sarcastic remarks in a preview thread.
Sorry, Cab. It's not that big a deal
and I probably should have let Tom say something about it if it bugs him. I think the reason it bugs me is because I want to see what Tom is going to say to someone his comment has upset: will he defuse the situation, or will he string the victim along? — and a BEdger jumping-in to soothe ruffled feathers is like the magician’s assistant revealing how the illusion works in the middle of the act.
by MiledAnimal on Feb 28, 2009 9:33 PM PST up reply actions 2 recs
I just do what everybody else does, I just take the opposing opinion and throw in a dash of hyperbole.
Look at the comments over there in the non-Blazers related threads. I spoke the truth. At least until they get a new coach and GM, we only have to deal with them four times a year.
Besides, there is no way that guy really hates the Blazers. The Blazers the probably the most lovable franchise in all of sports. Hating the Blazers because of the Miles thing is like hating mogwai because they can turn into gremlins.
What I don’t get is how other fans and some Blazers fans don’t think we should be proud of our team because they are winning and haven’t done anything in the playoffs. It’s like having a kid in highschool and telling him you can’t be proud of his or her accomplishments until they are in, or graduate from college.
If people talk trash about your team, apparently you’re supposed thank them and agree with them or you’ll be accused of being smug. The Blazers team and organization may not be perfect. Nobody is, and I’m not going to apologize for supporting them. That is what fans do.
I da man!
I don't think fans of other teams
don’t think we should be proud of our team. It’s more like when a bunch of nerdy losers are good friends and then one day, one of them starts hanging-out with the cool kids. It’s bad enough that he’s climbing the social ladder and leaving them behind, but when he tells everyone what losers they are, he can’t blame them for hacking his Facebook account and leaving Photoshops of him and barn animals.
Yeah
But you do hear it from both sides. “I don’t know why they’re so excited, that team hasn’t done anything.” It’s like we should ignore the team until they make the playoffs. Or fans of the team will say we’re not beating playoff teams in their home so we’re not an elite team and we shouldn’t be excited about out team. It’s all poppycock I tell ya, poppycock!
It rubs the lotion on its skin. It does this whenever it's told.
They just don't want to give our team any cred
until not to do so would expose them for the sour-grapes grumpy-grump haters they are. We’ll have to win six titles in a row before some of those guys will throw-in the towel.
Miles got booed more because we hate him.
The guy said he wanted to lose games so that our coach would get fired. The guy signed a big contract with us and then spent his time smoking pot and starring in movies when he should have been practicing. The guy came into the NBA with KG/TD level talent, and coasted along until his injury.
That is why I hate Miles and booed the crap out of him. I’d do the same thing if Patterson ever played against us again. The 9 million dollars is just a side thought that you people notice. You know, the people who didn’t care about Portland until 2-3 years ago.
I think the CanisHoopus hate
has some justification. We are largely an arrogant fan base here on B.E. with all that PritchSlap B.S. being just one example. With a model guy like Roy leading a team of mostly good guys, we have a basketball team that is easy enough for the enemy to like. It is we fans who need to learn how to win with class. It’s about being a good sport.
Brandon Roy just destroyed everything in his path. There's your rational analysis -- Dave
Also: COMCAST SUCKS!
by TwoDeep on Feb 28, 2009 7:52 AM PST reply actions 1 recs
Definitely
I can see why other fans would get tired of “PRITCHSLAPPED!” and the annointing of the Blazers as the next dynasty. We’ve proved nothing yet.
Lots of us BEdgers were tired of PS after the fifth or sixth time.
Clever pun with a nasty edge, used ad nauseum by Blazer homers to taunt other fans. No wonder other fans are equating us with Laker Fan.
by MiledAnimal on Feb 28, 2009 12:58 PM PST up reply actions
wait a sec
The over-use of the term Pritch-slap seemed more to be a good fun gag than anything else. If it stings opposing teams fans, its probably only because of the element of truth to it, not because Bedgers are weilding it like a sword.
Sheesh, is Raef Lafrentz crying himself to sleep at night because of RLEC?
Its like the whole hate issue, which frequently raises its head. Do we really hate? No. Its a harmless way of saying losing to that team is really frustrating and emotionally crippling, but with the exception of a small minority, don’t most fans understand it is just a game? I mean we say we hate, but its hate within the context of being a sports fan, not the hate within the scope of commiting a crime.
"All humans are hypocrites. The dumb humans are the ones that cant recognize this fact."-- Sophia
A good gag for some of us, but who outside of Blazerland
would enjoy it? Especially the fans of teams like the Clippers or Grizzlies or T-Wolves?
Spin it however you want, but a statement like, “KP Pritch-slapped McHale and Ainge” translates exactly as, “Our GM is a genius and punked your GM who is too stupid to get out of his own way.” The humor in the term lies in it being a clever pun and having possibly a grain of truth to it — maybe KP is a smarter GM than those guys, who knows — though let’s not forget that Danny Ainge has a ring and KP doesn’t.
Mix-in how often the term has appeared on Blazers Edge and elsewhere and it stopped being funny almost immediately just from sheer overuse.
We like to think of Blazers Edge as our home away from home, but it’s a public forum that attracts readers from all over the world. Every time we post or comment, we’re helping craft an image in the public eye of who we Blazer fans are. A term like PS, used repeatedly the way it has, connotes an image of juvenile, arrogant fans gleefully rubbing their team’s good fortune in the face of other fans and lacking the wit or manners even to know when enough is enough. That’s not an image I want in the mind of other teams’ fans when I visit their blogs. Stop-n-Pop’s comments indicate that the damage has already been done.
Have fun at others’ expense if you must, but don’t be surprised if they don’t like it.
by MiledAnimal on Feb 28, 2009 9:23 PM PST up reply actions 1 recs
Exceptionally well stated!!
Brandon Roy just destroyed everything in his path. There's your rational analysis -- Dave
Also: COMCAST SUCKS!
rekt 4 truth
Man, we should forfeit before roy’s hammy explodes, knocking him into LMA’s ear who loses his balance and hits Greg’s knee… - HurraKane212
http://www.nba.com/news/miles_10_080919.html
This game begs the question...
Why is it that veteran teams are praised for knowing how to conserve energy by playing slack in the first half but clamping down in the 2nd half to make a victory that was never in doubt but young teams are chastised for not being able to play hard for 48 minutes?
Spanish Main: The point of departure for enormous wealth in the form of gold, silver, gems, spices, hardwoods, hides, alley-oops, assists and three pointers.
You get praised, I think
when you start winning regularly doing that. The Blazers have started winning more than occasionally, but it has to be like clockwork. Sometimes they play slack and then follow it up by playing slack.
—Dave
FYI
Here is part two of the Blazers game reaction (not exactly a game recap)
"You're welcome friend
I love you."
- Tom "Dragline" inHawaii
Huge sour grapes.
Boo hoo, luck, boo hoo, coin flip. Really? There were other people in those drafts besides the two guys Portland got. Get over it already.
"Respect everyone, fear no one." -TP
This has nothing to do with last nights game
Well, it does, but the Spurs/Cavs game. Can someone get Pritchard on the phone for me? I think we need to be looking at Pops Mensah Bonsu before he gets anymore playing time to impress the Spurs coaching staff.
Life is hilarious.
Hating other teams
I typically hate teams because of their players and how they act. For that reason alone, people shouldn’t hate Portland. For now, we have one of the classiest group of guys in the NBA, almost to a fault.
some people hate becouse of fan bases and front offices, oh well
Man, we should forfeit before roy’s hammy explodes, knocking him into LMA’s ear who loses his balance and hits Greg’s knee… - HurraKane212
http://www.nba.com/news/miles_10_080919.html
Stop-n-Pop from Canis Hoopis-- On the list!
In response to 92wty’s post on Canis Hoopus’ “(Blank) Heads” — Stop-n-Pop cheap-shots us with this:
“I like it… ….because it can also be shortened (derisively) to "BMs". I think that’s as close as it gets.”
It’s one thing if the guy wants to hate on the Trail Blazers, or get overly-defensive when called on his remarks, but to liken Blazer Maniacs to BMs…..? That’s poor sportmanship at its lowest.
"All humans are hypocrites. The dumb humans are the ones that cant recognize this fact."-- Sophia
wait, whats a BM?? (other then a Blazer Maniac)
Man, we should forfeit before roy’s hammy explodes, knocking him into LMA’s ear who loses his balance and hits Greg’s knee… - HurraKane212
http://www.nba.com/news/miles_10_080919.html
I will always read that as Blazermaniac
What else? Baby Mama is sometimes used derisively, but I don’t really see it that way. B Minor? Bachelor of Medicine? Boston & Maine? British Museum?
P.S.: SnP is not evil-minded. If you guys disagree with each other and have different opinions about the Blazers, disagree and move on. It’s natural to have different opinions, or a different sense of humor, or a different level of . I disagreed with him and a few regulars about the Darius saga in the past, and he was always willing to discuss and protect Blazers fans from stupid comments by his own commenters. Guys like him or Matt from Blogabull or the Rockets blog are somewhat different from Dave and Ben in the way they run and write things, maybe more brash, but they are not the stupid bad guys out and about to insult people you encounter in some general forums (then again I don’t read enough SBN blogs to know who might be. I’m fairly confident SBN would get complaints about that and change out those blogs if there were enough). If you feel insulted and think it should be discussed, “escalate” it by email to him or to Dave, but don’t escalate it on the blog. That would only increase hard feelings, trolling (man I hate that word) and in the end get people banned.
Proud Odensheeple
by Norsktroll on Feb 28, 2009 9:47 PM PST up reply actions 1 recs

by 

































