Taking Stock--Part I
With 52 games gone and only 30 left, it's time to assess where we stand as a team and reflect on what we've learned about our individual players so far this season. Today we're going to look at things from a team perspective.
The Team's Progress
At 32-20 the Blazers are right in the middle of the playoff race in the Western Conference. Despite some questionable losses in the new year Portland remains in fourth place in the conference. Yes, that's by a hair, but prior to this season fourth by even a whisker would have been considered a miracle. To say that the team has performed consistently would be overstating things. But the team has certainly played more steady basketball than we're used to seeing. Key players like Brandon Roy, Lamarcus Aldridge, Steve Blake, and Joel Przybilla have developed a rhythm, a comfort level on the floor, and dependable production. For the first time in ages you can define what Blazer basketball looks like. And it doesn't look bad. The Blazers have amassed quality victories against San Antonio, Houston, Orlando, Miami (twice), New Orleans (twice), Toronto (twice), Phoenix, Denver, Boston, Detroit (twice), and Utah. Portland is 12-15 on the road and 20-5 at home, both solid marks.
The single greatest improvement in Portland's game this season so far has been the rebounding. The Blazers are very good defensive rebounders and terrific to the point of being overwhelming on the offensive boards. We have not seen glass work like this since the days of Sabonis, Grant, and Wallace. Rebounding keeps the Blazers in most games, allowing them to control the ball and catch up even when they fall behind.
The Blazers' offense has also been a bright spot this season. Gone are the days when Portland passed the ball around the perimeter six times only to hoist a desperation jumper against the shot clock. Bad shots are now a rarity for the Blazers. The offense is more organized and the players more comfortable in it. Sometimes you see a lot of passing, sometimes no passing, but you don't see fruitless passing and time being wasted. There's usually some kind of motion going on as well. The Blazers are no longer easy to guard.
The three-point shot has been a major weapon for Portland this year. They are 4th in the league in three-point percentage with Steve Blake, Rudy Fernandez, Travis Outlaw, and Brandon Roy all drilling them with consistency.
Interior scoring is not exactly flourishing, but Brandon Roy, Greg Oden, and Jerryd Bayless have been scoring at the rim and providing a more credible threat than we've had since Zach Randolph, Bonzi Wells, and Ruben Patterson were still motivated.
The Blazers turn the ball over relatively infrequently for a team so young. Part of that is the heady play of the point guards. Part of it is Brandon Roy taking more responsibility for scoring and shepherding the offense in general. Part of it is the nature of the slow-paced system.
Portland has unveiled a new array of devastating plays as well this season. So far we've seen Roy break backs from everywhere, watched Oden dunk, gaped in awe at Bayless' finishes, and stood up involuntarily for Sergio-to-Rudy alley-oops. And that doesn't even count making the touchdown signal when somebody hits a three. The Blazers are not only signaling they've arrived, they're wanting to be on your poster.
On the other end of the spectrum has been the Blazer defense. Not everything has been bad. Portland is getting back in transition far more often than in previous seasons. The Blazers are also preventing uncontested drives down the lane in the halfcourt. But the bad news defensively outweighs the good.
On a basic level Portland just isn't preventing opponents from getting good looks. The Blazers allow 46.5% shooting, 23rd in the league. They allow 38.3% three-point shooting, good for 26th. They don't have enough good individual defenders. Many of the defenders they do have are just too young--lacking experience, mass, or both. The most basic plays are often a coin flip for Portland defenders. They think instead of moving. They fall back or apart instead of throwing their weight around. Whatever speed or agility allows them to shake free on the offensive end does not translate to defense. They foul with their hands instead of blocking the way with their feet. When the defense becomes more complex, such as when rotations are required, the Blazers are slow and late. They react instead of acting. They cannot seem to communicate effectively or coordinate. Were it not for their rebounding prowess this team would never hold a team under 100. This team needs better, more experienced, quicker, and in some cases bigger defenders. This is one of the major things keeping the team from progressing from good to great.
Of late the Blazers have also shown signs of youth, to their detriment. Most players outside of the four steady ones mentioned above have evidenced wild swings in production, alertness, and effort. The reality of the marathon season appears to be setting in. Fatigue may be playing a role. Since Christmas we've seen outright losses to the Thunder, Bobcats, Clippers, and Warriors plus some wins that were closer than they should have been and some losses to superior teams in which we never seemed to get off of the launching pad. The team has not followed up its amazing start to the season with a sustained push for excellence. Getting by has been more like it. You can tell that they don't understand exactly what it takes to succeed at a high level in this league. The difference between Portland and the more seasoned playoff teams is still night and day. The Blazers occasionally have more exuberance but the elite teams always look more professional even when they are having an off night.
The prospects for the Blazers making the playoffs remain strong. The prospects for them making the playoffs in strong position, let alone winning once they get there, are still shaky. Portland's intensity seems to be slipping just when everybody else's will be ramping up. If they do not come back from the All-Star break motivated, focused, and energized they could be in for a rude awakening. You won't surprise good teams in March and April like you did in November and December. 22 of the Blazers' remaining 30 opponents are from the Western Conference and 18 of the 30 are legitimately in their conference's playoff hunt as of today. Remaining at the same winning percentage (certainly enough for a playoff ticket) requires Portland to win 18-19 of those 30 games. They probably have a little cushion in there but they push the boundaries at their peril. This will not be the year to try and back into the playoffs. The Blazers should do it, but they've also had outings where "should" turned into "didn't" pretty quickly. They'll need to bring their best ball to make the postseason comfortably. Flirting with anything else would be a mistake.
One-Sentence Season Summary: More than we'd hoped for, less than we want.
Tomorrow: Part II--Individual Assessments
--Dave (blazersub@yahoo.com)
P.S. A couple of people had talked to me earlier in the year about their ability to do visual diagrams. If that's you (or if you have the talent to do them well and quickly) please e-mail me within the next few days if you can.
0 recs |
50 comments
|
Comments
Not to nitpick
but Portland is actually 12-15 on the road, and 20-5 at home
by Dior Aranel on Feb 14, 2009 1:25 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
One more nitpick
It’s hard to view the Toronto wins as quality wins, the way they’ve played this year. The Chicago, NJ, and Milwaukie wins look better than wins against a 21-33 team. I don’t know why Toronto has been so bad, but beating them this year is no great boast.
When I rule the world, everyone will know how to use Excel.
by jscot on Feb 14, 2009 1:31 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
And one more
The Clips loss was before Christmas, and at the end of a brutal road trip schedule, and on a back to back. It wasn’t a “season is getting long, and we’re losing focus” kind of loss, it was more like Denver’s recent blowup at NJ — these things just happen when you play too many games at once and everyone is exhausted.
When I rule the world, everyone will know how to use Excel.
by jscot on Feb 14, 2009 1:36 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Lotus rules all
I know less than half of you half as well as I should like, and I like less than half of you half as well as you deserve.
by haildablazer on Feb 14, 2009 1:41 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
And one more
Lotus rules all.
I know less than half of you half as well as I should like, and I like less than half of you half as well as you deserve.
by haildablazer on Feb 14, 2009 1:41 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I'm still trying to figure out
how much you deserve to be liked.
When I rule the world, everyone will know how to use Excel.
by jscot on Feb 14, 2009 1:47 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Don't you
ever get tired of nitpicking?
—Dave
by Dave on Feb 14, 2009 7:40 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
You're lucky he only does it to you on the internet
I heard he spends his weekends literally nitpicking the homeless. He uses the same technique as primates where he dispose of the nit by consuming it.
Release your inner Kraken
by Dragline on Feb 14, 2009 8:25 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
In the evenings
I nitpick my nose.
When I rule the world, everyone will know how to use Excel.
by jscot on Feb 14, 2009 11:32 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
This is why I "hate" you and ben...
I was just writing this out in a fanpost, and I just thought I’d check any updates…
Dammit.
Great work. You took my idea and took it to the next level (as usual).
Jealous in P-town…
Brendan
PS
Any inside word on Oden?
I know less than half of you half as well as I should like, and I like less than half of you half as well as you deserve.
by haildablazer on Feb 14, 2009 1:36 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
like someone's knee.........................
I know less than half of you half as well as I should like, and I like less than half of you half as well as you deserve.
by haildablazer on Feb 14, 2009 1:40 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Nitpick over, time for substance
Steve Blake.
Let me just repeat that.
Steve Blake.
The bad losses (Thunder, Bobcats, Warriors) have all come when Steve Blake was out.
“The team has not followed up its amazing start to the season with a sustained push for excellence.” While Steve Blake was out.
“You can tell that they don’t understand exactly what it takes to succeed at a high level in this league.” With Steve Blake out.
Blake (right now) is the glue that holds this young team together and makes a solid team very good. Every problem you describe (and they are all real problems, obviously) is impacted by Blake’s absence, as are two of our key strengths mentioned further up (3 point shooting and turnovers).
If Steve were out indefinitely, I’d agree with your forward-looking comments. But he’s supposed to be back after the break, and we have three home games (none of them brutal) to get him back into the flow.
And the prospects for getting a 4-6 seed are very, very good, even if we don’t cash in the RLEC chip yet. Winning a series might be very much another matter, but this team is not an 8 seed.
When I rule the world, everyone will know how to use Excel.
by jscot on Feb 14, 2009 1:46 AM PST reply actions 2 recs
Blake is consistently underestimated
perhaps because the low turnovers are often taken for granted, this is an “invisible” positive (which, put together with our rebounding, contributes greatly to wins).
Blake also provides tremendous poise. Let’s not forget that he was the starting PG at Maryland when they won the NCAA. His unselfishness also helps a great deal by example, chemistry-wise.
ignacio
by ignacio on Feb 14, 2009 2:11 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
And Sergio is better on the second unit.
Karma
by Sabonis4Ever on Feb 14, 2009 2:41 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I definitely agree with this.
I sense with Blake’s injury, we’ve missed a lot of the Rudy-Sergio “chemistry” that was at one point beginning to take shape. Yes, I do think they had some chemistry together in the backcourt, and would rather have seen that develop during Blake’s absence than what we’ve seen of Sergio in the 1st unit.
The issue is when Blake returns. Should Sergio be relegated to a seat between Frye and Shav.? Personally, I don’t think he should. I think he would cry in this position like he did earlier in the year. If it wasn’t for his poor attitude display, I’d think differently and perhaps even consider keeping him. Bayless seems like he can take the heat in a relegated role and still compete.
What we need is a PG battle between 3 guys that all consider the other better than themselves so they can grow and mature. Sergio isn’t part of that 3 in Portland in the current context.
by hotstuffdb22 on Feb 14, 2009 4:14 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Sergio doesn't think he is better than Blake
But Sergio also knows that he shouldn’t be playing 9 minutes in a losing effort that he made no mistakes in.
Blake >> Sergio > Bayless
The only problem is that the fans and coach think it’s.
Blake > Bayless >> Sergio.
Not really a good situation for Sergio, and to be honest Rudy isn’t helping because people seem to think Sergio can’t play without Rudy. News flash! Anyone who moves without the ball will benefit from Sergio.
by Zaig on Feb 14, 2009 2:42 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
"Anyone who moves without the ball will benefit from Sergio."
Like Oden? O…wait….
Karma
by Sabonis4Ever on Feb 14, 2009 3:55 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Yahoo article
Nothing new or interesting, but whatever. Link
Karma
by Sabonis4Ever on Feb 14, 2009 3:26 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
it's a nice summation of where we are
ignacio
by ignacio on Feb 14, 2009 3:56 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Was anyone suprised by this?
Perhaps the biggest surprise of the season has been the play—and the tremendous popularity—of Spanish forward Rudy Fernandez.
I know they go on to talk about why he’s popular after this, but the explanation negates this statement that came prior, silly AP.
Don't Redeactivate Shavlik Randolph
by appel82 on Feb 14, 2009 9:32 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Nice Article. Enjoyed the read.
One comment is that we are heavy rookie-weighted. With 4 rookies each playing a significant role on the team, we’re bound to have these inconsistencies. This isn’t an excuse. It points more to your point that we need some veteran presence to teach these guys how to prepare and be professional.
Can someone remind me why we let James Jones go??
by hotstuffdb22 on Feb 14, 2009 4:17 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
Too expensive
and we figured Rudy, Martell, and Steve could carry the shooting load from distance. Plus Brandon, of course.
—Dave
by Dave on Feb 14, 2009 7:41 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Dave, did you call a Bay Area sports-talk show
a couple of nights ago to comment on the Super Bowl or the Raiders or something related to pro football? I was listening to KNBR on the commute home and Ralph “The Razor” Barbieri took a call from someone named Dave who sounded and talked exactly like you do.
by MiledAnimal on Feb 14, 2009 12:13 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
i thought he was a FA?
and just chose to leave, good move not to resign.
according to mike rice he just rode the workout bike all day anyway; ‘injury prone’ too.
Don't Redeactivate Shavlik Randolph
by appel82 on Feb 14, 2009 9:34 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Blazers miss Martell...
It was good to get Batum some early run and get an idea of what he might be able to bring in the near future, but Webster’s three years of experience would also help provide a veteran prescence. I believe that is why they let JJ33 go. He was too expensive, as Dave pointed out, and he had served his purpose in helping to mentor Martell and Travis in the ways of playing smart defense and stepping up to make big plays when the team needs a stop. Hopefully, we will get a chance to see if it took with Webster this year.
PTB Liberation Day - 2/10/04
by tssbro on Feb 14, 2009 9:45 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
He got a really nice deal with Miami
And he’s been too hurt to play for them this year yet.
It’s like a 5 year, good chunk of the MLE type deal. I forget the numbers, but it’s much more than we would have spent. Plus, now James is back home in Miami, where he’s from (he played against Steve Blake in high school, for a fun factoid you can tell your friends).
I say we got more than enough 3 point shooting, when healthy. Hell, with Blake healthy we’re one of the best 3 point shooting teams, and we haven’t even had Martell in all year.
I know you mean we miss the veteran presence, but his cost outweighed what he could actually provide us.
Mortimer
by Mortimer on Feb 14, 2009 11:48 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Perspective
The Blazers have already won as many games as they did just two years ago AND (if memory serves) they’ve got a younger player rotation than they did two years ago.
Many rebuilding teams seem to enjoy success in fits and starts, improving one year then falling back a little, then improving. This team has gotten steadily better AND younger from year to year. That’s one reason so many fans are so optimistic about the future.
Spanish Main: The point of departure for enormous wealth in the form of gold, silver, gems, spices, hardwoods, hides, alley-oops, assists and three pointers.
by LaughingJon on Feb 14, 2009 8:23 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
I totally agree with you about this next portion of the season
We will now really see where Portland stacks up in the west.
The veteran teams have been cruising along all season, but will now be shifting into another gear. Will the Blazers follow suit? Or will we be left behind, like last season?
We gave ourselves a little cushion, but we did leave a few wins on the table that may come back to bite us. However, if Portland can kick it up a notch along with the other top teams it won’t matter and we will be in the playoffs and feeling good about it. Otherwise, we are going to sit around pray that another team loses, and maybe, just maybe we squeak in….I’d take it, but it doesn’t feel very good.
I think teams like Utah, Houston, Dallas, New Orleans and yes, even Phoenix (if Nash sticks around) are going to be better in the stretch run of the season. And you know L*kers and San Antonio are going to be better. So, Portland really has its work cut out for it. I really hope, hope we are up to the challenge. Otherwise, its gonna be a long off-season.
by JasonT on Feb 14, 2009 9:03 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
Dave can't help it, it is just how he rolls.....
Dave, I know you are disinclined to “irrational exuberance” (expression registered to Alan Greenspan). You seem to pride yourself on not getting too high or getting too low. I get that. It is part of why this is such a great site, and why your posts are a calming influence on your readers.
That being said, I can’t resist gently teasing you just a bit for your Eyore tendencies. Before the season began, I believe you predicted a season record of 46-36, and a play-off seed of 8th. The reality is that the Blazers have made it through the toughest part of their schedule and are twelve games over .500, two games more than you predicted for the entire season. When you factor in the injuries the team has suffered: Martell, for the season; Blake, for a dozen games; Greg, for six games; and Brandon for four; it is clear that the team has exceeded your expectations significantly.
So how do you respond? With a burst of sunny optimism? Of course not, you warn that the team faces a slide into oblivion if they do not return “motivated, energized, and focused.” You spend an entire paragraph warning that they face potential disaster. Your point is, as always, well taken and well made, but it is chuckle-worthy that you go to such lengths to make it.
Lighten up my friend, the team is likely to be fine. Blake is returning. Martell will hopefully be coming behind him by a week or three. In their absence Batum, Bayless, and Sergio have developed significantly. Oden, while not yet consistent, is becoming a force. Aldridge and Outlaw both show continued improvement in shot selection and in taking the ball to the hole. There is also the very real prospect of a trade for a seasoned veteran.
The defensive problems are real, as are the rookie wall problems; but this team is quite likely to make the playoffs. How far they go will depend on their seed, their opponent, and the outcome of potential trades, but no one is likely to look forward to meeting them. Live it up a little, let yourself enjoy what this team has accomplished. Even if the worst were to happen, and the team were to miss the playoffs this year, it is clear that we are going to be a real force in the near future, and for years to come.
by upper left corner on Feb 14, 2009 11:04 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
Dave's a pastor, remember
Dave’s Easter sermon will be, “Yes, Jesus rose from the dead, but remember, there are people in Rome who still know how to build crosses.”
When I rule the world, everyone will know how to use Excel.
by jscot on Feb 14, 2009 11:42 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Made me laugh!
…..and we have a road game with the Romans (the original Rocky Road), so we better be motivated, energized, and focused!
by upper left corner on Feb 14, 2009 12:42 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
What I love is
The rational analysis of a team, what was expected of them, versus what they have achieved. Dave and Ben are great at this. We should all be proud of their record, and know that on any given night, any team can be beat by another team. It has been said over and over, we are playing four rookies, and collectively (minus RLEC) we are the youngest team in the league. We should be proud of where the Blazers are at this stage of developement.
What annoys me is some of the fan base on the game day threads posting comparision of players to used toilet paper and such. Is is my take, or are the game threads becoming more and more vicious? The threads seem to be in the beginning stages reminding me of the trashy JustineTV threads minus the racial comments.
I am a believer in free speech but what do you think Dave? Is the some of the posting getting out of line?
by Holybackboards on Feb 14, 2009 11:52 AM PST reply actions 1 recs
I guess you've been fortunate enough to miss the racist comments. There aren't many but
they are there.
"Aneurysm".
When Outlaw wins a game on a last-second shot, it’s called an "annthefaneurysm". QualityPie
by annthefan on Feb 14, 2009 12:25 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I never comment
or read in the game day threads during the game.
Silly me, I’d rather watch the game, if I’m not sleeping at the time.
When I rule the world, everyone will know how to use Excel.
by jscot on Feb 14, 2009 12:30 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I would too but I'm usually trying to watch a 1 1/2 x 2 1/2 inch screen on
my computer so I sometimes need help to know what’s going on. I miss Timmay on the game day threads. He was good at the play by play.
"Aneurysm".
When Outlaw wins a game on a last-second shot, it’s called an "annthefaneurysm". QualityPie
by annthefan on Feb 14, 2009 12:49 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I do not comment either because
I live in Southern Oregon where I can get Direct TV – but due to Comcast no picture. I live on either JustinTV, NBA gamecast where a description of the play happens, or the radio, which is mostly static. I bounce back and forth between NBA gamecast to see the score, and who is scoring – and the game thread reading the fans descriptions. Lately Justin has been slooooooow in my neck of the woods.
Anne – you are very good at not replying to all of the Travis haters.
by Holybackboards on Feb 14, 2009 1:30 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I've been trying really hard to restrain myself. It's not easy.
I feel the same way about the comments many of the players on the team get but Travis is the target of the most heinous, asinine and feeble-minded comments. . I feel that the Bedge has been invaded this year by a lot of riff-raff who are more suited for the Justintv and O-live sites.
"Aneurysm".
When Outlaw wins a game on a last-second shot, it’s called an "annthefaneurysm". QualityPie
by annthefan on Feb 14, 2009 1:48 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Agreed
That’s partially why I was asking Dave for his opinion.
I have lurked on this site for years, back to the Casey days, and it is only recently that I have felt a serious amount of poor taste invading the comments. I have wondered if that’s partially why people like jsnake and sophia have recently left.
by Holybackboards on Feb 14, 2009 1:56 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Mortimer has kind of cut back on that.
Release your inner Kraken
by Dragline on Feb 14, 2009 12:48 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Yep. He was the worst offender. Who says you can't learn from your mistakes?
"Aneurysm".
When Outlaw wins a game on a last-second shot, it’s called an "annthefaneurysm". QualityPie
by annthefan on Feb 14, 2009 1:31 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
What can I say
I hate the blacks, and it makes watching the NBA a struggle.
OOOOH I hates ’em so much, I could kiss ’em and press their flesh into mine, their must wafting up my nostrils as I close my eyes and imagine a world, a world far far away, where I could just be alone, free and alone, just me and that enchanting musk, beind held tight, safe in their hated disgusting arms.
“Low BBIQ” is the new N-word.
Mortimer
by Mortimer on Feb 15, 2009 3:14 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs

by 



















