The next two months will be an extended audition
Whoever's playing with the set of Trailblazer voodoo dolls really needs to find something else to play with. Today came news of another significant injury. Rudy Fernandez had back surgery and will be out 4-6 weeks recuperating. Fernandez is the fourth major rotation player to succumb to serious injury so far this season. The Blazers have only nine active players on the roster and one of them (LaMarcus Aldridge) was sidelined just recently with swelling in his knee. Almost overnight, the conversation has shifted from whether the Blazers are a championship contender to whether they can even make the playoffs. John Hollinger's computer projections currently have the Blazers finishing 9th, one spot out of the playoffs.
Needless to say, the season isn't going quite the way most of us envisioned it would. That said, there really is a silver lining here if you squint hard enough.
Going into the season, the pressing question was how Nate McMillan was going to find enough minutes for everyone. And let's face it, there was no way he was going to be able to. There just aren't enough minutes in a game to get 11 or 12 guys meaningful minutes. And that's not just a problem from a team chemistry, keeping everyone happy perspective. Many of the players on the Blazer roster are assets of unknown value. Until a player gets meaningful minutes in real game situations, it's really hard to know what you've got. Had everyone stayed healthy, odds are that Jerryd Bayless and Dante Cunningham would have seen little, if any, playing time this year, particularly before the trading deadline in February, when the Blazers will have big decisions to make.
In light of the injuries to Travis Outlaw and Rudy Fernandez, however, both Bayless and Cunningham appear poised to get significant minutes over the next month or two. And when Jeff Pendergraph joins the active roster (likely next month), he's likely to see playing time as well. Thus, we figure to get a real good look over the middle part of this season at some guys we otherwise would have had a very hard time evaluating. In the long run, that's good for the franchise. It's much better to make personnel decisions from a position of knowledge. It makes the Jermaine O'Neal scenario less likely (where a team doesn't realize it has a perennial all-star on its roster and trades him for scrubs). By the time Rudy Fernandez rejoins the rotation, we should have a much better sense of where Jerryd Bayless fits--if at all--in the team's future plans. Given that we currently have three point guards on the roster, one of whom has an expiring contract and the other of whom is a potentially valuable trade asset, that's an important thing to know.
Indeed, if you look at the players who are currently injured, they are all guys for whom we have a pretty good sense of what they bring to the table. We know what Outlaw brings. He's been on the team for years. With respect to Batum, Oden, and Fernandez, we may not yet know what their ceilings are as players, but they all played significant minutes last year and we have a pretty good sense of what they can do.
The same is not true of the guys who are healthy (or are likely to be soon). Among that group, we have two rookies (Cunningham, Pendergraph) and a second year player who got very little meaningful playing time as a rookie (Bayless). We also have a guy (Martell Webster) who missed all of last season with a foot injury and another guy (Andre Miller) who is new to the team. If we're going to be running a skeleton crew, these aren't bad guys to have on it. These are the guys whose futures are most up in the air, whose value is most difficult to determine. These guys are the question marks. And despite all the injuries, the fact remains that we have more guys on our roster than we can afford to keep long term and that, at some point, and probably sooner rather than later, we're going to need to package some of them up and make a move.
Among the ten players currently on (or soon to be on) the active roster, we can be pretty certain that Roy and Aldridge will be Blazers for years to come. But with respect to everyone else, the next few months will essentially be an extended audition. They're all going to get the chance to prove themselves and to prove that they deserve a spot on the roster long term. If nothing else, the next few months should be clarifying. And at least that's something.
15 comments
|
1 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I thought I heard the Mikes (I think) say
That he’s ahead of schedule on rehab and could be back by Christmas. Same goes for Pendy.
Still on the Rex bandwagon.
exactly right
if the Blazers have sense, they will use this opportunity to see what Bayless and Webster are worth to this franchise, and to give the rookies burn.
"The only 'Advanced Metric' that matters is what you see with your eyes." -Timbo, Nov., 2009.
You are absolutely correct
Use this time fo see what talent the team has, and provide the opportunity for playing time to develop it.
But is Bayless going to play any
PG? Right now we don’t have Rudy anymore so Bayless has to play SG. In order to find out if Jerryd has a future with the Blazers, he has to play some minutes at PG with Roy at SG. Nate has to bench both Blake and Miller to allow that to happen and I doubt Nate has the stomach to put that much faith in anyone not named Blake.
I think Bayless will be playing a combo guard role....
…..which is fine because that is probably what this team needs in the long run.
I think Bayless has the ability to play successfully next to Miller, Roy, or Rudy. He can guard the one, bring up the ball, and share playmaking duties.
Seems to me people get way to hung up on labels and don’t spend enough time talking about tasks and functions.
by upper left corner on Dec 9, 2009 8:07 AM PST up reply actions
well put
Even if Bayless isn’t playing the 1 on offense, just having him on the court will be incredibly helpful in terms of evaluating his value. And it’s not as if our offense relies on a pure point guard to run it. Steve Blake’s skills as a distributor are limited. There’s no reason Bayless can’t eventually be as good as Blake in terms of pure point skills. And he’s already a bigger scoring threat.
Bayless could potentially fit well alongside Brandon Roy. The key is for him to continue to improve his jumpshot.
www.blazerguy.com
.....and his defense
My problem with Blake for his entire tenure in Portland has been less on the offensive end and more on the defensive end.
Bayless is going to be a much better defender. He is starting to cut down on the fouls and starting to develop a bit more team defense awareness. He is already better at keeping his man in front of him than Blake, although that isn’t saying much. Ford blew by Blake at will last night.
by upper left corner on Dec 10, 2009 4:24 AM PST up reply actions
Is this Martell's make our break year?
I’m thinking that if he doesn’t break out, we’ll be looking at Batum and Claver at the SF and could be gone.
I don’t think Travis is trade bait anymore, his absence hurt the team a heck of a lot more than anyone anticipated. There were wins to be had in several games if the team could have found an offensive spark to break some opponent runs. So I think the trade bait is Martell if anyone.
I think the trade bait is Martell
Marty’s not bait of any kind, he’s scaring the fish away
His salary could be used as trade filler, I suppose. But what NBA GM in his right mind would take on 3 more years at 5 mil/year for what Webster is currently producing?
When reached 40 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!
oops
I guess the 3rd year of Martell’s contract isn’t fully guaranteed…still, you don’t trade for a guy in hopes that you won’t have to pay him 5.7 mil in 2012-2013
When reached 40 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!
so we're firing nate by the all star game!?!
The Faith don't panic, the faith freaks out, burns out farms, and torchs small villages in the name of The Faith.
Head Czar of Amerika <--- Mortimer said so so there!!!
There is a balance
between risking losses and developing young players. Our coaching staff in the last couple years has been focusing more and more on wins vs development. Bayless is a prime example of their philosophy in action. He will end up being a pretty good player and they know it, but they still do not give him much run for fear of his mistakes costing wins. I personally feel that the coaching staff’s stance is too conservative and inflexible.
#52
From the last couple of games
it doesn’t appear to me that this team is going to give Bayless a consistant 20 mins a game off the bench. The coaches are giving even more minutes to Blake wishing he could help their offense look better. Bayless has proven this year that his jumper is more reliable than last year, and he can still get the the basket and draw fouls. His PER is second only to Roy on the teams active players, because he is producing even in small minutes. This guy needs to be given 20 mins minimum per night until Rudy, Outlaw, or Batum come back, there is no excuse for it not to happen. I am fed up with Blake playing close to 40 mins a night.
Maybe we need to set up a picket line outside of the Blazers practice facility, or schedule an old school 70’s sit in on the Rose Garden court before a game, but Blake needs to be playing no more than 30 mins a night, and Bayless needs a chance. The time is now, there is no good reason for it not to happen.
Ben II Blazersedge.com || New to Blazers' Edge?
Hollinger's take on Blake vs Miller/Bayless
Jeff (Portland)
Why do Steve Blake play SO MANY minutes for the Blazers when they have better players on the bench?
John Hollinger (12:36 PM)
Brandon Roy loves playing with Blake and McMillan has given Roy a lot of rope, but they need to look really hard at this. Blake is a backup. Period. If Blazers are going anywhere this year, and I’m not necessarily sure they are, it will be with either Miller or Bayless running point
from his chat today.
Ben II Blazersedge.com || New to Blazers' Edge?

by 



























