Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: The Animated GIFs Of January

Aaron Gray to Blazers - Trade Proposal

Bulls fan here looking for feedback. I suggest the Blazers acquire Aaron Gray for a 2nd round draft pick (since Gray's salary is less than the Blazers' cap space, no player needs be sent back to the Bulls).

Why the Blazers do it:

- Oden is out for the season, so the Blazers could use another center to backup Pryzbilla.

- Gray can provide some post offense and rebounding, and while not a great defender, is a huge body with 6 fouls to give.

- The Blazers give up very little, since Gray's contract expires at the end of the season, and Paul Allen can always buy another 2nd round pick from a financially struggling team.

 

Why the Bulls do it:

- The Bulls do not have enough salary space to sign a badly needed 3-pt. shooter and/or reserve PF, and Jerry Reinsdorf will not go above the luxury tax. Trading the little used Gray would open up $1M to sign another player.

 

Why Gray approves the trade (since he is on the qualifying offer):

- A chance for more playing time, which will increase the probability of getting another NBA contract next season.

 

Your thoughts?

Poll
Should the Blazer trade a 2nd round pick for Aaron Gray?
Yes
70 votes
No
40 votes

110 votes | Poll has closed

Comment 50 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

I saw 12 on the roster here:

http://www.basketball-reference.com/teams/POR/2010.html

Can someone tell me if there are injury exemptions, or could Mills or Pendergraph be assigned to the D-League?

"Then you need a center so if the ball gets stuck between the rim and backboard he can reach up and knock it loose instead of having to spend 15 minutes trying to hit it with a broom stick." – Sam Smith

by Granny Waiters on Dec 7, 2009 7:43 PM PST up reply actions  

You only let 12 dudes be active yeah?

Mills, Pendergraph, and Batum are “inactive” meaning that they don’t suit up

--

by CaptainSexyJacob on Dec 7, 2009 7:51 PM PST up reply actions  

I've always thought that Aaron Gray is not as bad as he sometimes seems.

He’s a foul magnet, and can’t jump, but he actually has some skills. He could be worse.

ignacio

by ignacio on Dec 7, 2009 9:02 PM PST reply actions  

lock Gray and Jaren Collins in a gym, playing 1 on 1

and 30 minutes later will they have scored a single basket?

When reached 40 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!

by two4larue on Dec 7, 2009 9:27 PM PST up reply actions  

xtra roster spot

we are applying for a hardship injury exemption so that we can get another roster spot.. just as the rockets did with yao

by crookie monster on Dec 7, 2009 9:21 PM PST reply actions  

I can see why Aaron Gray would fit but...

Maybe the Blazers should go after Troy Murphy. If you’re talking about providing offense and rebounding, Murphy can do both. I don’t know what his contract status is and what the Blazers would have to give up to get him. He would definitely have a bigger contract then Gray and the Blazers would probably have to give up more. So depending on what the Pacers would want and depending on his contract, if all that is good then I’d say go after Troy Murphy.

by Aaron Sass on Dec 7, 2009 11:03 PM PST reply actions  

you don't want Murphy

he’s due 23+ mil over the next 2 years

http://www.storytellerscontracts.info/resources/09-10salaries.htm

On the Pacer’s roster I like Jeff Foster. (But that was back when Portland had a healthy team that had a chance to go somewhere in the playoffs…) KP could probably get Josh McRoberts back, on the cheap

When reached 40 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!

by two4larue on Dec 7, 2009 11:12 PM PST up reply actions  

I like Foster as well.

But then, what’s not to like? He is Australian for beer.

by xedubx on Dec 8, 2009 1:15 AM PST up reply actions   3 recs

Not only is Troy Murphy an insanely overpaid 4 who can't play the 5, he's also one of the worst interior ...

defenders in the entire NBA. Hell, I’d even take Andrea Bargnani over Murphy when it comes to man-to-man low-post defense. The one guy who’d be helpful for Portland on Indiana is Jeff Foster, but I dobut he’s going anywhere.

Dear Paul Allen:

Fire Nate McMillan & hire Jeff Van Gundy.

Sincerely,
AK1984

by AK1984 on Dec 8, 2009 3:28 AM PST up reply actions  

What would you guys be willing to deal for Lu Deng? Is there any interest?

I think Deng’s defense and rebounding could be a good compliment to Aldridge and Roy.

Or how about John Salmons?

by Basketball Smurf on Dec 8, 2009 12:49 AM PST reply actions  

We need a PF/C

much more than we need a SF.

#52

by jscot on Dec 8, 2009 1:02 AM PST up reply actions  

I would love to get Deng

but I get a feeling that the Bulls would ask too much.

What would YOU want for Deng? If it includes the big 3 then no…
fernandez probably

Just a minor setback for a major comeback.
#52
Now it's YOUR time.
#7

by GreatOden'sRaven on Dec 8, 2009 7:36 PM PST up reply actions  

You can have Kurt Hinrich

for Fernandez.

"Then you need a center so if the ball gets stuck between the rim and backboard he can reach up and knock it loose instead of having to spend 15 minutes trying to hit it with a broom stick." – Sam Smith

by Granny Waiters on Dec 8, 2009 8:00 PM PST up reply actions  

Why?

I understand that a lot of folks like Hinrich, me included. But we have FOUR PGs on the roster already.

Rudy is young, cheap, and talented. I would trade Blake + money, picks, Euros (depending on the +) for Hinrich in a heartbeat. But I would be reluctant to see Rudy go.

I would guess that Hinrich would start. Miller should be the backup. What happens to Blake and Bayless? Bayless could take Rudy’s spot as Roy’s back-up, but he would struggle defending SGs rather than PGs.

Not saying I categorically reject the idea, just curious how you and others think this would work.

by upper left corner on Dec 9, 2009 8:23 AM PST up reply actions  

Hinrich can play SG.

What’s the difference? He defends bigger guards better than Rudy, so even though he looks like a traditional PG, it’s really defense that matters.

Start him at PG, then play him as a SG next to Miller in the second unit. Give Bayless some burn. Whatever.

by Nick Van Excellent on Dec 9, 2009 8:49 AM PST up reply actions  

If we're looking for defense

maybe we shouldn’t trade away the guy that’s been the best perimeter defender on our team this year. Just a thought.

by as11osu on Dec 10, 2009 12:13 AM PST up reply actions  

I would be happy with a Hinrich for Blake and/or Bayless trade.

Heck, if the Blazers had enough cap space, they could have Hinrich for a bag of basketballs as far as I am concerned.

(Bulls fan bitter over keeping Hinrich and letter Ben Gordon go for nothing.)

"Then you need a center so if the ball gets stuck between the rim and backboard he can reach up and knock it loose instead of having to spend 15 minutes trying to hit it with a broom stick." – Sam Smith

by Granny Waiters on Dec 9, 2009 12:42 PM PST up reply actions  

Trading Bayless to get Hinrich is a no go with me and reportedly with KP

Seriously, what is with you folks that you can’t see what a monster Bayless is going to become?

Trade him for a 29 year old solid journeyman with a career PER of 14.6?

Makes absolutely no sense to me.

by upper left corner on Dec 10, 2009 4:19 AM PST up reply actions  

You guys get the cap room next summer,

and you can have Hinrich for a single basketball that leaks.

We miss you, Ben Gordon!

by Granny Waiters on Dec 10, 2009 10:06 AM PST up reply actions  

so what WOULD you want for Deng?

I am curious, I too think he would be an EXCELLENT fit on this team..

obviously we wouldnt give you Roy for anyone, Rose included.. Trading Aldridge back to you would somewhat make Deng irrelevant

Just a minor setback for a major comeback.
#52
Now it's YOUR time.
#7

by GreatOden'sRaven on Dec 9, 2009 2:44 PM PST up reply actions  

Since Deng apparently has a problem playing with Derrick Rose,

he needs to go. However, Deng’s large salary and Portland having mostly lower salary players makes the trade difficult.

For trades that work, I would take Bayless, Outlaw and Webster for Deng, or Deng and Tyrus Thomas for LMA, Bayless and Webster.

We miss you, Ben Gordon!

by Granny Waiters on Dec 9, 2009 11:13 PM PST up reply actions  

I would be tempted

We’d have to let Patty Mills go.

I’d probably wait until mid-January, unless someone else goes down, to see how Pendergraph is doing for us.

#52

by jscot on Dec 8, 2009 1:04 AM PST reply actions  

You're confident he's better than Gray?

In either case, you’d have to waive Mills.

The second round pick is largely irrelevant.

So it comes down to which of the two is a better player in our system.

#52

by jscot on Dec 8, 2009 6:21 AM PST up reply actions  

It could be 2011 instead of 2010.

"Then you need a center so if the ball gets stuck between the rim and backboard he can reach up and knock it loose instead of having to spend 15 minutes trying to hit it with a broom stick." – Sam Smith

by Granny Waiters on Dec 8, 2009 10:06 AM PST up reply actions  

the big picture fix

- GO is easily my favorite Blazer, followed by Rudy, Batum, Bayless and Joel. Everyone else is expendable for the right price, a point upon which reasonable minds may differ. And one last preface, none of this is intended to “dis” anybody; it’s not personal. IMO the most conspicuous disappointments of this year are: BRoy is not the white hat hero I believed; LMA is “soft” given our need of a hard banging Scola, Kenyon Martin type of forward, Travis is totally unreliable, Martell is an unknown
we’d love tohave succeed, but for whom evidence is far too thin; Blake lacks all his well chronicled deficiencies; Miller is a talent who fits well with the right kind of team (as we have no idea concerning our true identity – who we are upon exiting the phone booth) so KP needs to decide upon where and how to go. I like Howard, but liked Shavlick more. They do not much matter to this discussion. P Mills is a semi-complete unknown crap shot, as a replacement for Rubio, Brooks et al he does not yet count. Pendergraph the same. Dante seems to have heart, will, strength and skill; is he of an advantageous size?

- Now then what to do. Target # 1 is CP3. For him we trade B Roy and one more up to TO’s level. Works for both sides. Darn close to even. CP3 has the single strongest WILL to win I have ever seen, along with obvious talent.

- The new 4 could be any one of a number who fit by reason of age, health, strength of will and body and talent. For Mr. 4 we have LMA to offer and perhaps one more; Martell would be agreeable.

- So the line up now becomes: CP3, Rudy, Batum, Mr. 4 and Joel/Greg. I like the fun and the surpassing skill of it.

- Regrettably Nate who has many virtues is not the coach for the new gang. He wants to play too slow and error free to bring out the best of what we might have. Who; I don’t know – a quality fundamentals, sensible risk taker, coach buy don’t control the players guy. Jackson would do nicely, but almost certainly would not trade Canon Beach for Malibu.

- The new # 6 is Bayless aiming for 25 minutes a night. Miller, if he fits backs CP3.

- That leaves us with need of a strong offensive 3, a combo 4 and a 3d back up 5. Behind those we have need of five, well seasoned skill players. Viola the 10/11 Blazers.

- To fine tune in addition to playing together enough to know when and where the passes and moves are coming, it might help if Joel had a term at sticky hands school and Batum at pull the trigger on open shots school. OMO that should be enough to compete with anyone. No doubt there will be some other ideas, so let’s hear them starting with who is essential and who is expendable on the right terms please.

by blazer_believer on Dec 8, 2009 8:54 AM PST reply actions  

Except that it is impossible

under salary cap rules. Because CP3 is BYC and Roy is Poison Pill this year, they cannot be traded for each other.

Oh, and also N.O. wouldn’t do it.

Oh, and Rudy and Batum are both out for a while.

And it is trading two healthy players (LMA and Martell) for a new PF (unspecified), and we can’t afford 2 for 1s of healthy players right now.

And he hasn’t identified which PF is better than LMA and would be available.

And he hasn’t identified which coach who is available he would get.

And we have no depth in case people get injured, and people do get injured, in case no one has noticed that.

And he fails to acknowledge that if Joel doesn’t have sticky hands by now, it isn’t going to happen.

But other than all that, it’s a great post.

#52

by jscot on Dec 8, 2009 11:42 AM PST up reply actions   1 recs

respect for correction

In my mind jscot is a top of the ladder regular contributor to whom I happily defer.

I suppose the sudden collapse of the famous depth in the house of blazer changes everything. Perhaps realistically we are frozen where we are until and if health returns.

My primary angst arises from the perception that our Blazers are a house divided pulling in different directions. Ideally we should sort that out so there is one team with one direction. In my mind unfortunately that is seeming unlikely and so it is the Oden branch and the Roy branch which make our tree crooked. Instead of agonizing away for a year or two with no guarantee of an advantageous outcome, my thought was to solve the conflict peremptorily. My personal preference was for the Oden branch.

Much recent posting casts solid doubt that we can foreseeable rely on Oden as the trunk of our tree. He may just not be blessed with the right kind of wood. Whereas two days ago I imagined trading our way into harmony, that no longer seems realistic. That means to me we do the best we can with what we’ve got and hope to be as good at is as Houston has been with their 6’6" center.

by blazer_believer on Dec 8, 2009 4:48 PM PST up reply actions  

You are right as to the problem, IMO

We do not seem to have things together at all, nor did we before the injuries. Even before the Travis injury.

Solution? Your solution won’t work, I’m afraid, for some of the reasons stated. Nor even if it did work, would it necessarily be desirable.

I’m not ready to give up/blow up the team. This team has been constructed with a vision in mind. There are really only two problems on the roster.

The first is at starting PG. The second is lack of big man depth. That’s all, really. We need to find a starting PG who fits well with the guys we have, and we need another quality big man.

There are lots of other problems, but they aren’t personnel problems, they are execution, etc. Someone needs to teach Brandon how to actually run the pick and roll, to hit the man rolling to the hoop when the defenders double him. LMA needs to continue to improve his defensive rebounding. And we need a coach or a veteran (I nominate Joel) to knock some heads together and say, “You idiots, this isn’t working.”

The whole Oden branch/Roy branch thing would be ended if we just used them in a pick and roll run effectively. Then, instead of this silly “this time down it is Brandon’s play, next time down it is Greg’s play”, we’d be running a play where both of them are involved, and we let the defense pick their poison.

Is Brandon going to mind getting 15 assists in one game and only 12 points because they keep deciding to stop him and he feeds Greg? Of course not. Is Greg going to mind if he’s setting the picks that set Brandon free to score 35 points, and so he only gets 8 that game? No. Neither of these guys are really selfish. But neither wants to just be a spectator while the other operates, either.

These are all decent guys who ought to be able to work this stuff out. And I still think we have that starting PG on the roster. So it is way premature to blow it up.

And if we do blow it up, it is going to cost us and leave us with a weaker team. It always does.

#52

by jscot on Dec 9, 2009 1:25 AM PST up reply actions  

another well reasoned position

You’re a hard guy with whom to argue. Appreciate we agree on the nature of the problem. Your approach seems far less disruptive and logically ought to work out. Logic has not seemed our best thing so far this year, but hey, let’s give it a chance. When did you say the rules permit a CP3 option?

by blazer_believer on Dec 9, 2009 2:09 AM PST up reply actions  

Not this year, for sure

Brandon is almost impossible to trade this year because of the poison pill provision. I’m too lazy to look it up, but if I remember correctly, this means that Portland can only count his salary for this year as going out, while the other team has to count his salary for next year as coming in.

Now, I’m also too lazy to look the numbers up, but let’s say Roy makes $4 million now and $13.5 million next year. That means Portland can only take back $4 million in salary (that’s all they send out under the rules), but the other team has to send out $13.5 million, since they are taking back $13.5.

So can Roy be traded at all this year? Yes, under two scenarios. One is if a team that has cap space is involved. If a team had $10 million in cap space, they could send us $4 million in salaries, and we’d have a salary match, and they could take Roy — they’d have $14 million in space to take his contract after sending us that $4 million. Only OKC has significant cap space, and Roy isn’t going there.

The other scenario is a massive trade. If we add another $16 million in salaries, then we are sending out $20 million. Under the 125% rule, we could bring back $25 million. The other team would be sending out $25 million, which would allow them to bring back $31 million, and we would be sending them $30 million, so the trade would work. Effectively, to trade Brandon anywhere except to a team with cap space, we would have to trade another $16 million in salaries (Joel, Andre, and Jerryd, perhaps) and take back $25 million.

So, that’s Brandon.

Now for CP3. He’s BYC. That means his team can only count half of his salary as going out, but the other team has to count all of his salary as coming in. CP3 makes about $14 million. That means to trade him, N.O. can only take back $7 milliion, while the other team will get $14 million. This is much more doable.

Again, there is only one team with that much cap space, OKC. However, there ARE teams that have trade exemptions. Someone is going to have to absorb some salary, and a team with a trade exemption could, in a three team deal. Suppose that the team that gets CP3 sends $5 million in salary to a team with a trade exemption and $7 million to N.O. They have sent out $12 million and taken back $14 million, within the 125% limit. N.O. has taken back and sent out $7 million.

CP3’s salary complications can also be solved with a blockbuster trade. Suppose they send out, in addition to Paul, an additional $10 million, and take back $20 million. Now, they’ve sent $17 million, within the 125%, and the other team has sent out $20 million and taken back $24 million. This also is within 125%.

So both of these guys can theoretically be traded this year, but practically, it is very difficult. And to trade them for each other is probably impossible even if you lumped in the entire rosters. Portland in trading Roy would be sending out $4 million, and taking back $14 million (CP3). N.O. would be sending out $7 million, and taking back $13.5 million (Roy).

If each team added in $20 million more in salaries, N.O. would barely be legal, but Portland still wouldn’t. You would have to add in an additional $30 million plus in salaries to get this one legal, which would take Joel, Andre, Martell, Travis, Steve, and someone else.

If it weren’t for the Darius chunk out of our cap space, we’d have a shot at making this work, but otherwise, it just won’t fly.

Next summer, two things change. First, CP3 won’t be BYC anymore. That means his salary can be traded straight across. Second, Brandon stops being Poison Pill and becomes BYC. That makes it hard to trade him, but much more practical. See the discussion above for how tradeable CP3 is now, while he’s BYC. Basically, next summer, we would have to add another $10 million in salaries and they would have to add another $6 million or so.

Another significant issue here is that LMA is Poison Pill right now, and BYC next year. So that means that we can’t really include him in any of these deals, or he just makes them harder to work out.

#52

by jscot on Dec 9, 2009 4:35 AM PST up reply actions  

Oh, one more comment

My approach is only less disruptive and logically going to work if we actually implement a real pick and roll or other approach that goes away from so much isolation offense.

We could use the iso in the fourth, if that really is our most efficient play, but my guess is it would cease to be our most efficient play if we learned to run the pick and roll well.

#52

by jscot on Dec 9, 2009 4:38 AM PST up reply actions  

Give Kirk Hinrich a try. Please.

We’ll take whatever you offer, as long as it reduces 2010 salary.

We need to find a starting PG who fits well with the guys we have…

"Then you need a center so if the ball gets stuck between the rim and backboard he can reach up and knock it loose instead of having to spend 15 minutes trying to hit it with a broom stick." – Sam Smith

by Granny Waiters on Dec 9, 2009 3:02 AM PST up reply actions  

At this point, shouldn't the Blazers be selling their own 2nd rounders for cash?

We already have 10 legitimate rotation players (if they are even healthy at the same time), and if you count all the guys in Europe, we have another 10 guys on the fringe trying to get on the court. The last thing we need is to start piling more fringe dudes into the mix.

Since I know nothing about Gray or whether we need another C, this is a bit unrelated to this post, I know. Sorry.

Two points scored by GO’ = "thunderdunk"

by T$ 225 on Dec 8, 2009 9:28 AM PST reply actions  

If we can turn one of them into some injury cover

that is better than selling for cash.

We could certainly use another C right now, though ideally one that is better than Gray.

#52

by jscot on Dec 8, 2009 11:43 AM PST up reply actions  

Gray is a legitimate NBA 3rd string center,

who is worth the veterans minimum salary wise. As I pointed out in the FanPost, he would be a temporary body at the 5 until Oden (hopefully) returns for the 2010-2011 season.

Since I know nothing about Gray

"Then you need a center so if the ball gets stuck between the rim and backboard he can reach up and knock it loose instead of having to spend 15 minutes trying to hit it with a broom stick." – Sam Smith

by Granny Waiters on Dec 8, 2009 10:11 AM PST reply actions  

you mean HOPEFULLY returns for 2009-2010

he will CERTAINLY be ready to play next season.. possibly even in time for the playoffs if we make them

Just a minor setback for a major comeback.
#52
Now it's YOUR time.
#7

by GreatOden'sRaven on Dec 8, 2009 7:38 PM PST up reply actions  

The blazers should bring in Joel Freeland to play the center position

by Akbar503 on Dec 8, 2009 8:14 PM PST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

The ultimate coverage and analysis of the Portland Trail Blazers.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
The Blazers Future Regarding Free Agent Signings
Small
Thunderous Manboobies
Img_0878_1__small
Why do we hate LaMarcus Aldridge?
Small
Oregonlive "journalists" 2 new posts...same old drivel
2474796688_7cdc78828f_o_small
Greg Oden Suffers Life-Ending Injury; Gets 3-Year Extension

Recent FanPosts

Small
Earl Boykins!
Small
LaMarcus Aldridge about to become the 10th highest scorer in Blazers franchise  history
Small
New trade that gets us a new point and a three point shooter
Small
Portland getting.....
Small
The Sun Behind the Clouds: Blazers still on track.
Blazers_small
What are we missing?
Red_blazer_logo_small
The Felton Trade, Linsanity, and the PG Position 1 year from now
Small
Effort?
Small
WE NEED JOSE CALDERON ASAP.

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

FanShots

Quick hits of video, photos, quotes, chats, links and lists that you find around the web.

Recommended FanShots

Blazers Broadcasters Mike Barrett and Mike Rice re-enacted NBA referee Scott Foster's controversial goaltending call on Portland Trail Blazers forward LaMarcus Aldridge, who was defending Oklahoma City Thunder All-Star forward Kevin Durant, during this week's edition of Blazers Courtside. Remarkably, no one was injured during the taping of this segment.

Original video of the play here. 
Quotes from the players and coaches here. 
The NBA admitting it got the call wrong here. 
Dave's  extended thoughts here. 
BlazersMakr's FanShot: Major Vegas action on OKC prior to tip here. 
Audio of Chad Doing of 750 AM The Game going HAM on Foster here.

OK, that should just about wrap up the goaltending discussion.

Courtside video via Blazers Broadcasting cameraman John Curry.

-- Ben Golliver | benjamin.golliver@gmail.com | Twitter
In 2008 Tim Donaghy indicated that Scott Foster was a ref that also fixed games
Blazers Owner Paul Allen Ranked No. 3 American Philanthropist In 2011
Rhino
I'm sure you've all heard the news by now that I'm having a scope on my...

Recent FanShots

LaMarcus Aldridge Needs Support Around Him
LaMarcus Aldridge Finds Out He's An All-Star With His Teammates
Congratulations to Portland Trail Blazers forward LaMarcus Aldridge, on his first All Star selection.

As seen on www.trailblazers.com
AWoj: Aldridge an All Star
It's pretty clear that the season is over already ;)
Double rainbow of sadness:

1) JBay is getting shorter
2) We never got to see him with a mustache

I miss you tiny raptor man.

via The Basketball Jones http://blogs.thescore.com/tbj/2012/02/09/things-of-note-for-february-9-2012/#more-34561
CRAZY stat from Houston game
NBA MVP Rankings... LMA @ #10
Celtics interested in Rondo - Gasol swap? ...
Batum - Top 10 NBA Sixth Men

+ New FanShot All FanShots >


Editors

Kitten_small Dave

Headshotsmall_small Ben Golliver

Lead Moderators

Getfuzzy-satchel_small Timmay!

Bucky3_small Cablinasian

Authors

Plainlc_small Storyteller

Moderators

Lamb_small T Darkstar

Small douglast

Terryporter_small prezofdeath

Small usmcr3049

Lrg_magpie_small Corvid

Wallpaper_small geoffm