Game 33 Recap: Blazers 93, Sixers 104
Hey, give Philadelphia full credit for their win tonight. This game was a tale of two defenses. Or rather a tale of one defense and some intermittent bothering. Philly was the "defense" part. They figured out how to play the short-handed Blazers perfectly. Bring energy to prevent easy, relaxed decisions. You know that whatever the Blazers run it's going to take a while to develop. Use your quickness to get to the play before it unfolds. Guess that the first option is going to be the strong preference and stifle it. If Portland does manage to find a second option it's not going to be nearly as good. They may survive a quarter or a half, but not 48 minutes. The Sixers moved their feet, brought it hard, and won the game exactly they way they should have.
That's not to say the Blazers played horribly. In the first quarter they were particularly active on defense and generally did well throughout the first half. They suffered a little in transition and they were occasionally overmatched in size but they compensated well thanks to some sterling individual effort on the part of supporting players like Webster, Pendergraph, and Cunningham. But Portland couldn't sustain the energy through the second half. All of a sudden the Sixers were rebounding, running, and getting to the rim at will. If they weren't dashing and dunking they were feeding Elton Brand in the post or driving guards through the lane. Portland had no shot blocking and their rotations ranged from poor to none. Where they had managed only 22 and 21 in the first two periods the Sixers posted 34 and 27 in the final two. I think everybody in the universe knows that unless the stars align in perfect fashion the Blazers aren't going to be able to generate enough offense to compensate for 30-point quarters right now.
The Sixers ended up shooting almost 58% for the game. The Blazers shot 42%. Neither team put up a lot of threes but Portland was sustained by some early threes going in...shots that missed badly later in the game. The Blazers nabbed 15 offensive rebounds to Philly's 8 but the teams were all but equal in second-chance points because the quick-reacting Sixers were all over the offensive rebounder whereas the slower-reacting Blazers either left the rebounder in single coverage or just watched him score. Portland dominated at the line but couldn't hit a high enough percentage (18-26 or 69% on the night) to make the difference tell. The Blazers withstood Philadelphia's pressure and committed only 7 turnovers for the game...no small feat given the active defense. But Portland doesn't force turnovers either so that didn't help as much as it could have. It kept the Blazers from flat-out losing but didn't really help them win. Philly scored 16 fast break points to Portland's 7, which was somewhat expected. The Sixers scored 60 points in the paint to Portland's 40, which was a massacre. That's the most telling stat of the evening. It shows you how porous the defense became in that second half. Philadelphia scored more points in the paint out of their halfcourt offense than the Blazers did for the whole game. Overcoming that is a tough order.
Individual Notes
The offense was not clicking for either of the Blazers' stars. That was evidenced from the start of the game when both Brandon Roy and LaMarcus Aldridge missed shots they've been hitting with ease recently. Right now that's almost guaranteed disaster for the team. LaMarcus in particular eschewed the lane completely, passing up a couple of open invitations to get in the paint in favor of jumpers or the pass-off. Roy tried to drive but the Sixers were lying in wait for him. If he could have popped the "J" the pressure would have eased but outside of a couple of threes it wasn't falling, which means Philly had no incentive to play him for anything but the drive. Both players missed free throws also. LaMarcus gave the team 12 rebounds but couldn't keep Elton Brand from doing everything he wanted. Roy didn't have the team mojo going. On those nights he needs 44, not 24, to be successful. To be fair the Sixers encouraged all of this, as any team with half a brain would do right now. It just so happens that they had the athletes and commitment to make it happen whereas some other teams recently have lacked one or the other. Roy: 24 points. Aldridge 17 and 12.
Andre Miller played a nice game. His offensive attack was smart and controlled. Andre is at his best when you don't notice his offense. If he's standing out it's either because he's missing jumpers or taking un-veteran-point-guardish shots. Tonight he mixed post-ups, jump shots, and drives into his 7 attempts, keeping the defense at least somewhat off guard. He hit 4 of those attempts and converted all three of his free throws for 11 points total. He also had 7 of the Blazers' 19 assists, threading some legitimately nifty passes.
Martell Webster came out energized at the start of the game, threw himself around early, hit some shots, and then faded away. The spurts of energy are great and overall I think Martell has been playing solidly lately, but you need more than 6 points and 5 boards from a starter playing 36 minutes. Mike Rice mentioned during the broadcast that the Sixers got away with guarding Martell with Allen Iverson for long stretches. That shouldn't happen without Webster getting shot attempts.
Juwan Howard played 20 minutes and had 6 points, 2 rebounds, and 4 personal fouls. He was giving everything he had and his shot remains impressive. He was just physically overmatched and he shouldn't be called upon to do as much as the Blazers have to ask of him right now.
Steve Blake got 24 minutes and, like the rest of the team, hit early to give Portland a lift. But the promising spring turned into a wilted autumn for him as well as the jumpers stopped falling. 4-10 for 10 points, 3 assists, 2 rebounds.
Jerryd Bayless had another rough night, going 0-7 from the field and managing 2 points and 4 assists in 16 minutes. Mike and Mike mentioned something we had picked up on last game: the league knows about him now. As they did with most of the critical Blazers, they defended him perfectly. They knew to not do a thing with him on the dribble drive, as that would probably result in a foul. Just shadow him and wait...wait...wait because once he starts his forward progress he's not going anywhere but down the lane to put a shot up. When he tries to score, strike and block the shot. After he got capped early he tried to compensate with the jumper. It wasn't falling. And without Bayless producing that bench scoring gets pretty thin.
Two guys who did have good nights, though, were Jeff Pendergraph and Dante Cunningham. Pendergraph had a career high 11 points on 4-5 shooting, 3-4 from the line in 19 minutes. He also provided 5 rebounds, a block, and a super-sized cup full of energy. I loved watching him scrap in there. Cunningham only went 2-6 for 6 points but he was moving his feet as well. The 6 points in 7 minutes was nice, but then again Dante has often been the shot-a-minute man this year as well. With the weak bench that's fine but at some point he's going to have to moderate. That, or start hitting everything. In any case both guys provided a lift. They are great examples of what good bench players can do. Neither one is a threat to score 20 on a regular basis (at least not at this point). Neither one will make anybody's fantasy team or dark-horse breakout list. But you don't need a Maserati to mow the lawn. Both of these guys are straight-up John Deeres who are going to do the job and then head back to the garage. This is one of the difference between depth on paper and practical depth. Let's hope they can continue to provide the latter.
Final Thoughts
You had to know a loss was coming sometime. In fact as I've said a couple times on the podcast you seldom worry about the short-term effects of season-ending injuries as the team tends to compensate and the league hasn't adjusted yet. You worry about January, February, March not being up to snuff. But those months aren't here yet and this loss to a 7-win team doesn't hurt you much unless you succumb to a second loss in a row without much of a fight. The cavalry's not riding over the hill yet. From the top two players down the Blazers need to figure out how to get the most out of the guys they do have, which means keeping efficiency high, energy up, and trust intact. There's no other choice right now. It starts with simple things like always getting back in transition and always covering the boards. You don't worry about getting more shots for people, rather making the shots you're already getting better. You depend on your best players to hit and let everyone else feed off of them. And you pat guys like Pendergraph and Howard on the back for doing their part every bit as much as you praise Roy and Aldridge. Let's hope that takes hold again for the Clippers game, allowing us to put this loss behind us.
Check out LibertyBallers for the Philadelphia perspective.
See your Jersey Contest scores for the game here and enter the final game of the month right here.
--Dave (blazersub@yahoo.com)
26 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
more than one Sixers fan is mystified
Why we didn’t post up Andre on Lou Williams more than once tonight. That was money in the bank.
good question
not to mention at least trying to post Webster on Iverson as well. But exploiting mismatches isn’t exactly our M.O., is it?
How did you guys win that?
"We scored enough points. We scored 107, they scored 105.
-Nate McMillan Postgame, 3/4/2009
Bayless was indeed off
Much of that, as Dave said, was a result of good Philly D. For some reason, the explosion at the rim was absent, he tried to go with soft stuff and the bigs swatted him. I felt very good about Pendergraph’s performance, great intensity and he showed a willingness to get physical. Honestly, with his size/ability to play some spot 5, Pendy could be a great piece here. Dante looked like a poor man’s TO, but depending on what happens in the offseason, there may be minutes to be had for him down the road as well.
Always supporting Greg Oden.
Free AK1984.
Just for the record (and maybe because I am a little bit sensitive about this).
Dante looked like a poor man’s TO,
Dante and Travis are very different players. DC is lunch-pail, TO is showtime. DC is high BBIQ, TO is low. DC is physical and tough, TO not so much. Cunningham likes a good rebound, Outlaw doesn’t want to get caught with one. These are two very different players. A better comparison for DC would be Matt Harpring, although I realize no comparison is perfect.
#52
Both players can be helpful
Dante and I will be glad when more of those open jumpers go in the hole.
I’m sensitive too, about Outlaw being thrown under the bus over and over again. Both players can be helpful to the Blazers. – Elgin
OK...so girls in movies where guys wear hockey masks have a better survival rate than the average Blazer player. - Dave
Not really much of an argument there
I believe there is a role for Outlaw just like there is a role for Blake. My problem with the DC to TO comparison is that DC cannot do some of the things that Outlaw can do, nobody can, but even with that being said, there are some other things that he does that could end up being very helpful to the team. I think it is a really poor comparison. Very few people would compare Harpring to TO, it just doesn’t make sense.
#52
by KINGofMACct on Dec 29, 2009 10:36 AM PST up reply actions
I was at the game
Pretty good first half, but you could tell the Blazers felt like they had it in the bag coming out for the 2nd half. I think they found something very different in that bag after Philly stole it, filled it, and lit it, rang the doorbell, and ran away with the game.
OMG I just jizzed in my France
Only saw the first half
We looked great, huge half from Pendy and some nice passes by Dre’. The transition game is killing the Blazers.
Too few assists; too many missed shots; too little D
The Blazers lose if the whole team isn’t involved. If Roy only has 1 assist, it doesn’t much matter how many consecutive games with 20 or more points he has. Gotta run some plays for Martell and get some easy baskets. Still don’t like the “new” small ball combo of Blake, Roy, and Bayless — hot one game, cold tonight.
Going to be a rare day when we prevail if we go 0 for 7 on 3’s and allow the opposition to shoot 58%
Well, the good thing is the next shot at redemption is only two days away.
one-man foul trouble is achilles heel
Pendy and Dante held it together somewhat at the end of the first half when Juwan went out, but when it happened again in the third after Juwan’s fourth is when the light went on for Philly and they simply couldn’t hang on.
looks more to me like he's pressing too hard at home.
How did you guys win that?
"We scored enough points. We scored 107, they scored 105.
-Nate McMillan Postgame, 3/4/2009
Bayless
Is streakier than my underpants after a night of coors light and hot wings
by kikifromdowntown on Dec 29, 2009 12:51 AM PST via mobile reply actions
We could have used Andre a lot more in that game than we did.
Andre’s post ups looked way too easy and he could have gone off on his old team, but for some reason I guess Nate didn’t want to use that to his advantage in this game.
Story of the game in my mind:
their rotations ranged from poor to none
Not much else to say really.
How did you guys win that?
"We scored enough points. We scored 107, they scored 105.
-Nate McMillan Postgame, 3/4/2009
Bayless must play regardless of his performance
Miller played 33 minutes and the Blazers were -8, Blake played 24 and the Blazers were -12, Bayless played 16 and the Blazers were -1.
The kid’s jumper isn’t going to be falling like rain every night. Clearly, 0-7 isn’t a good line. But his energy and athleticism still has an effect on the game. Despite the 0-7, the Blazers were still only -1 while Jerryd was on the court. Even when he’s not hitting, Jerryd can break the defense down at will and create opportunities. Nate must must must let him get out there and learn.
Even as he was blowing up the last few games, I knew this would happen. As soon as the J stops falling, it’s back down to 16 minutes.
It’s not like he even really played that poorly, other than missing. He still attacked well and passed well. 4 assists to 1 turnover ain’t bad in 16 minutes.
It is better for this season and much much MUCH better for the upcoming seasons if Jerryd plays 25-35 minutes EVERY NIGHT, regardless of whether he’s hitting or not. He does enough other good things to deserve minutes, and he provides another threat for a team that sorely needs one.
Not to mention that, along with Oden and LMA, he is among the most important players on the roster in terms of development towards championship contention. Blake and Miller are adequate vets, but there is absolutely no good reason why either one of them should get minutes over Bayless right now.
Why can Blake or Miller have an awful game and still play 25-30 minutes, but Jerryd can’t? It doesn’t make sense to me. Nate is not acting in the best interests of the franchise.
Q: Is Greg favoring his knee?
Frye: He favors dunking on your head, that's what he favors.
I was contemplating the same thing when your post flashed on my screen.
Why can Blake or Miller have an awful game and still play 25-30 minutes, but Jerryd can’t? It doesn’t make sense to me.
I would have liked to have seen more of Bayless and Cunningham last night—their effort was there, and looking at their plus minus, they were not really hurting us overall. Late in the third and on into the 4th I was hoping to see the Bayless, Miller, Roy combination rather than the Blake, Bayless or Miller, Roy combination. Blake was doing very little positive and was getting scored on consistently, the only positive exception for him was a three and a two he scored late, well after the game was decided—once he came in in the third, he never came out again despite the game getting more and more out of hand. Frustrating to watch.
#52
Agree that Bayless should play more, good or bad
Jerryd Bayless has hit that point that rookie NFL quarterbacks generally hit in their second year. Suddenly, other teams start planning for you, and you are expected to run the entire offense, not just part of it. He needs to learn how to adapt to what defenses give him. His teammates also need to learn that Jerryd is an attacking player, so they need to be sure to get to a spot where Jerryd can see them and hit them with a pass. If his passing game and court vision begin to rival his ability to finish at the rim, he will be a very dangerous player.
Additionally, LaMarcus Aldridge absolutely must start playing bigger. He has to start attacking the lane a lot more. I know he doesn’t like that “soft” label, but quite honestly, that’s how he plays. He gets rebounds because he is 6’11", not because he is good at it. Roy, Bayless, and Miller would all be more effective if LMA established himself more in the paint and at the rim: his defender would have be more careful about helping out on drives, knowing that LMA is a threat insight. Right now, he just isn’t one.
Mike Rice mentioned during the broadcast that the Sixers got away with guarding Martell with Allen Iverson for long stretches. That shouldn’t happen without Webster getting shot attempts.
What is up with that?
I would sure like to see Martell get the ball and be asked to score, sometime before Batum and Outlaw come back from injury. – Elgin
OK...so girls in movies where guys wear hockey masks have a better survival rate than the average Blazer player. - Dave
I saw this as well
Maybe AI is too big and physical for Martell? Maybe they were worried that this would cause Martell to be doubled and cause some open outside shots? I also wondered about posting up Miller a little more against their guards—he looked pretty good when he did it.
#52
by KINGofMACct on Dec 29, 2009 10:42 AM PST up reply actions
haha
Neither one will make anybody’s fantasy team or dark-horse breakout list.
i am SO considering picking up pendegraph after last night on my fantasy team. I can also pick up j. howard (its a deep league) but me wonders if his 30 a game min will be bitten into by pendergraph.
advice?

by 



















