No Tank You
I suppose with all the adversity the Blazers are currently facing, it's no surprise that the advocates for tanking the season have begun to crawl out of the woodwork. I am fundamentally opposed to this stratagem, but first I want to address the practical side of things:
First of all, tanking in Basketball does not carry the same guarantees that it does in other sports, such as football. Even you do manage to "win" the tank game, the only thing you accomplish is by marginally increasing your chances to get the top pick. Already a questionable strategy there.
Second, even if the Blazers actively try to throw games, it seems unlikely that they will manage to out-lose some of the truly bad teams out there.
Those points aside, not trying to win has all kinds of negative effects on the team and fans. The Blazers have spent a lot of time and energy convincing us that they are committed to being a championship team that care about its fans. The best way to destroy that goodwill is to quit trying and tell the fans you don't care about this year. Also, accepting an atmosphere of losing is not a good attitude to instill in our very young core of players.
For those of you who remember my post from last year, I watch the Blazers because of being a fan/wanting them to entertain me first, and for the winning second. Having them give up the first for an uncertain chance at the second seems unreasonable to me. I want to see Roy scoring in the clutch, LA scoring at will, Rudy thrilling from the outside, and Jerryd on both ends of alley-oops. I think the fans still want to come out and watch the Blazers-the Blazers should still want to come out and perform their best for them. For those of you who think it's just business, how many companies succeed by selling an inferior product with the promise that the next version will be better if they get lucky?
Some of you argue that we need to see what the young guys can do...our injury situation has made that argument weak, since there are now plenty of minutes to go around. Plus, I don't really think we need to see what Tolliver can do (nothing against him personally, it just doesn't seem like he figures highly in our future). Also, any evaluation of the rookies needs to include how they play with our veterans, right?
Finally, the object of tanking is to obtain the best draft pick...do the Blazers need to continue to stockpile draft picks at this point? I know it makes draft day fun, but eventually you have to stop remaking and tinkering with the roster and go out a win!
And, of course, what you do in the face of adversity says a lot about your character.
16 comments
|
3 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Portland won't tank
Portland’s only sports franchise throwing games? That’s a way to lose the fanbase quickly.
i think people advocating tanking
dont realize just how bad some of the teams this year are. Yes the Blazers have been devastated by injuries, but our two top guys are still playing, heck we just beat Mavs, a very good team with our puny roster. Make no mistake, the Blazers are STACKED with talent, a third of our roster goes down and we’re still a mediocre team. Pretty much the only way to tank in the NBA is if your team is already awful and you want to ensure that it’s the MOST awful of them all.
Also, tanking is stupid.
this is true
We can’t tank to great effect this season, so we should try to win as much as possible.
by Sound_Automatic on Dec 23, 2009 5:00 PM PST up reply actions
getting the worse record this year only means you have a 1 in 4 chance of landing wall
not good odds
bayless leaves over my dead body
Start Bayless (in a 2 guard lineup)
if you should strike Oden down he will become more powerful than you can possibly imagine
#52
#4
Can someone give a rational explanation of why blake plays 36 minutes a game?
Exactly
remember what happened to Boston and Milwaukee and all the other “tankers” in the Oden Draft?
I know less than half of you half as well as I should like, and I like less than half of you half as well as you deserve.
by haildablazer on Dec 24, 2009 11:24 AM PST up reply actions
There is a differnence between tanking and choosing to prioritize development rather than short term wins.
Tanking means almost trying to loose.
Deciding to emphasize development means working to put the team in position to win future games rather than solely focusing on winning immediately.
The team needs to try to be competitive and entertaining, but that doesn’t mean playing Roy, LMA, Miller, and Blake max minutes every game.
by upper left corner on Dec 23, 2009 1:18 PM PST reply actions
Exactly
In my view, the 3 young, non-set rotation guys on this roster (Bayless, Cunningham, Pendergraph) should get ample opportunities to show what they can do and how they could fit with the core next season. Running LMA and Roy into the ground to the tune of 45mpg is short sighted, as would be rushing Rudy, Nic and Travis back from injury. Play hard, but just as importantly, play smart should be the motto for KP/the coaches the rest of this season.
Always supporting Greg Oden.
Free AK1984.
by blazeraddict on Dec 23, 2009 1:25 PM PST up reply actions
This season is going to tank without anybody having to try...
"A bizarre and extremely rare hybrid Blazer/Laker fan, Timbo has always struggled to contain the Beast Within, like Dr. Jekyll, Bruce Banner, or Ted Kennedy." — Miled Animal
but how far?
we are not a playoff team with no center, but right now, I say we are a 35-45 win team. what draft pick is that? 12-14?
bayless leaves over my dead body
Start Bayless (in a 2 guard lineup)
if you should strike Oden down he will become more powerful than you can possibly imagine
#52
#4
Can someone give a rational explanation of why blake plays 36 minutes a game?
by thomasikehara on Dec 23, 2009 4:11 PM PST up reply actions
expect the unexpected ...
… then add injuries for 5 of your prolific players. yikes! while the injury situation makes the playoffs look distant I think that we’ll see a metamorphosis of the Blazers players from scripted roles to more self-prescribed performers throughout the rest of the season. these guys have too much heart to tank.

patience my son ...
Lets pluck camby from the clips
And not tank. I hate tanking. We can not tank far enough for an upgrade in talent over any position we have. And tanking for depth, especially with how improbably the number of injuries has been, seems pointless.
by Sound_Automatic on Dec 23, 2009 4:14 PM PST reply actions
If Roy's injury is anything but a sore shoulder.
We might not have to tank. If you get what I am saying.





















