Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Explaining Jeremy Lin's Early, Surprising Success

Sched Ahead for 12/21/09, Week Eight -- Now with PROJECTIONS!!!

Yes, it has come, the moment you've all been waiting for, the return of the jscot Stupid Sched Projections (c)!  Be still, my beating heart!

All experienced Bedgers know that the methodology of these projections is completely suspect, generating numbers that no one could intelligently accept as indicative of anything.  But they are OUR numbers, and we love them.  That's just the way we roll.

Rookie Bedgers may not know about the projections.  Never fear, jscot is here, and I will explain them after the jump.

Star-divide

TIRED OLD SUMMARY INFO YOU GET EVERY WEEK

This weekly schedule analysis is based on four categories of games:

  1. Home games against sub .500 teams.  Cream Puff Home.
  2. Home games against winning teams (I'm including teams right at .500 in this category).  Jawbreaker Home.
  3. Road games at losing teams.  Banana Peel Road.
  4. Road games at winning teams.  Rocky Road.

A general formula for success in the NBA is to win almost all of Cat 1 (Cream Puff Home), a majority of Cat 2 (Jawbreaker Home) and Cat 3 (Banana Peel Road), and win some in Cat 4 (Rocky Road).  The contenders may win more than half of their Cat 4 games.

Back to Backs (hereafter BtoB) are also tracked so as to provide further data on schedule difficulty.

Last week's update

EXCITING NEW SUMMARY INFO ABOUT THE PROJECTIONS

The jscot Stupid Sched Projections were more accurate last year than any expert prognostications or anything generated using advanced metrics.  I am convinced that this is primarily because the stars aligned right, I sacrificed my third-born, and someone who believed in these was sticking pins in voodoo dolls at important moments to make it come out right.  (It is also because I constantly updated them, so the changes were so gradual that people didn't notice how wrong they had been earlier.  But don't tell anyone that.)

The projections work very simply.  I look (well, actually, my spreadsheet does, I'm much too lazy to do this myself) at the games that each team has played so far in each category of games.  Using my high-powered Excel expertise, I calculate a winning percentage for that team in that category of games (don't try this at home, kids, you might sprain your mouse finger).  I then multiply that percentage by the number of remaining games in that category, to calculate a projected number of wins from that category in remaining games.  Adding those projected wins to the wins already gained, I have a total projected number for that category.

Now, here's where it gets really tricky, so listen carefully.  I add up the projected total wins from each category and I have the Stupid Sched Projection.

This is a "projection" because it is based on extrapolating past performance.  It is a "sched projection" because it is based on the schedule of remaining games.  "But, WAIT!" you might say, "why is it stupid?"

How is it stupid?  Let me count the ways:

  • Small sample size.  Phoenix has played precisely two Cat 2 games so far.  How can two games predict how they will play one quarter of their games this season?  Only in the realm of "stupid" projections can they do so.
  • Ignores long term injury effects.  Portland has one Cat 4 win, at OKC.  Greg and Travis and Rudy played in that game.  How can we use a game in which those guys played to project games in which they won't play?  This is stupid! 
  • Ignores in-season development.  Rookies often progress as the season goes along, other players have a hot start but fade.  This assumes teams will play the same at the end of the season as they played at the beginning of the season.  This never works out to be the case.

So why are we wasting our time with these?

  • Because a lot of people like them.  Nuff said.
  • Because they don't get caught up in a team getting hot at home or against weak competition.  Last year, everyone started to decide Utah was going to win the division when they caught up to everyone, winning a lot of games at once.  The spreadsheet knew -- six of their last ten were Cat 4 games, and they had been terrible all year in those games.  They went 1-5 in those six games, and dropped to third in the division.  The spreadsheet is better than W/L record.  The spreadsheet is better than home/away records -- because it knows not just whether or not you were at home, but also whether you played good teams or not.
  • Because it gives us something to talk about besides why Nate played Blake so much, and some of us are getting tired of rehashing it over and over.  We don't KNOW why, for crying out loud!  Let's drown our sorrows after tough road losses in some stupid spreadsheet numbers that mean nothing, instead.  You can't get mad at the dumb spreadsheet, it is what it is.

CHANGES THIS WEEK

Milwaukee is back below .500, so their games are recategorized.  They change every week.  Wish they'd make up their mind.  Actually, I think they have, now.  OKC barely stayed above water, right at .500.  N.O. pretended they were going to make a run at .500, but it didn't last.  If they don't get there this week, they might not until mid-January -- they have a tougher stretch coming up.   

COMMENTS ON THE WEEK

Portland (3-1), a great week.  Won a Cream Puff (Cat 1) at home against Sacramento, a tough Cat 2 at home against the Suns, and then split the Cat 4 Rocky Road back to backs in Florida.  Out of the six game stretch starting with Phoenix, two wins would have been a good performance -- and we already have that, with a chance to do better.

Dallas (3-1).  Another good week for the Mavs, starting with a Cat 1 win at home against the Hornets, then a nice Cat 4 at OKC, before splitting Cat 2 Jawbreakers against Houston and Cleveland.  The Houston loss was more of a tooth-breaker, I suppose, with Landry sinking bits of his teeth into Dirk's elbow.  The Mavs beat the Cavs without Dirk, don't know if he'll be back for our game this week or not.

Denver (2-2) didn't have a very good week, winning a couple Cat 2s at home (OKC, Houston, both teams on a BtoB), but then slipping on two Banana Peel Cat3s in a row, at N.O. and Memphis. 

Houston (3-1) had a nice week.  Adelman cried about four straight back to backs, but they came out of the first two (a 4 in 5 nights) with three wins.  The only loss was a BtoB Cat 4 Rocky Road in Denver, with wins at home vs. Detroit (Cat 1 Cream Puff), at Dallas (Cat 4), and home to OKC (Cat 2 Jawbreaker, both teams BtoB). 

L.A.  (4-0) proved that, at least against bad teams, they CAN win away from Staples, with four Cat 3 Banana Peel wins, on consecutive BtoBs with two days off in between.  Victims -- Bulls, Bucks, Nets, Pistons.

N.O. (2-2) had an up and down week, playing a game in every category, winning at home and losing on the road.  The Cat 4 was at Dallas to start the week, the Cat 3 Banana Peel was at Toronto to end it.  In between, home wins vs. Detroit (Cat 1, Pistons were on a BtoB) and Denver (Cat 2) kept them respectable. 

The Blunder (1-3) had a tough week and paid the price, winning a Cat 1 Cream Puff at home against Detroit, but losing two BtoB Cat 4s at Denver and Houston (Rockets also on a BtoB) AND a Cat 2 Jawbreaker at home to Dallas.

Phoenix (2-1) had a decent week, opening with a good Cat 2 win at home vs. the Spurs and finishing with a Cat 1 Cream Puff win against Washington.  In between, they went on the Rocky Road to Portland, where a Byrannosaurus Rex tore their hearts out and stomped all over them. 

S.A. (2-1) pretty much did what you'd expect, losing a Cat 4 at Phoenix, winning a BtoB Cat 3 at G.S., and then winning a Cat 1 Cream Puff at home against Indiana.   

Utah (2-2) had a bizarre but not quite terrible week.  They started by dropping a Cat 1 Cream Puff at home to Minnesota.  How could a good team lose at home to the Timberwolves?  Ask Denver, I guess.  But Utah is 0-2 against them which is impressive, in a not good way.  Anyway, the Jazz then went out on the road and won two of three, losing as expected at Atlanta (Cat 4), but taking care of two Cat 3 Banana Peels, at NJ (Nets on a BtoB) and Charlotte (Jazz on a BtoB).

New Orleans and Utah (at home) each took a loss to losing teams, Denver took two for the second straight week. 

Helped themselves:  Portland, Dallas, Houston, L.A.

Held position: Phoenix, S.A. 

Hurt themselves:  Denver, N.O., Blunder, Utah.

The tables:

Cat 4 -- Rocky Road

  W L Played Left
Portland 2 5 7 12
Dallas 4 2 6 13
Denver 2 2 4 16
Houston 4 5 9 11
L.A. 2 2 4 17
N.O. 0 8 8 14
OKC 3 5 8 12
Phoenix 3 7 10 9
S.A. 1 5 6 15
Utah 1 6 7 14
 

Portland (at Miami), Dallas (at OKC), and Houston (at Dallas) got the only Cat 4 wins of the week.  Most teams have a few more of these left than we do, which could help us down the road. 

Cat 3 -- Banana Peel Road 

  W L Played Left
Portland 5 3 8 14
Dallas 6 2 8 14
Denver 5 6 11 10
Houston 5 2 7 14
L.A. 5 0 5 15
N.O. 2 3 5 14
OKC 3 1 4 17
Phoenix 5 2 7 15
S.A. 2 1 3 17
Utah 4 1 5 15
 

Denver has played far more road games against weak teams than anyone else -- and has lost their last four in this category.  Having most of their remaining road games be against winning teams could catch up to them.  Last year, the Nuggets only lost six games all year in this category, and they've already matched that this year.

Cat 2 -- Jawbreaker Home

  W L Played Left
Portland 4 3 7 13
Dallas 5 2 7 13
Denver 6 0 6 14
Houston 4 4 8 13
L.A. 6 2 8 12
N.O. 4 1 5 16
OKC 1 6 7 14
Phoenix 2 0 2 17
S.A. 1 4 5 14
Utah 5 2 7 13
 

Dallas and OKC took losses in this category this week.  Phoenix still has played only two games at home against winning teams.  If OKC and S.A. want to get rolling, holding the home court against good teams would be a place to start.

Cat 1 -- Cream Puff Home

  W L Played Left
Portland 6 1 7 14
Dallas 5 2 7 14
Denver 6 1 7 14
Houston 3 0 3 17
L.A. 9 0 9 12
N.O. 6 2 8 12
OKC 6 1 7 13
Phoenix 8 0 8 14
S.A. 10 0 10 12
Utah 6 2 8 13
 

Utah was the only team with a Cream Puff loss this week.  Houston still has a lot of these stored up.  Notice S.A.  The Spurs have played 10 home games against losing teams, and won all of them.  Take those out of their record and they would be 4-10!  The spreadsheet doesn't like the softness of their schedule, and their inability to perform well against strong teams. 

All Home Games

  W L Played Left
Portland 10 4 14 27
Dallas 10 4 14 27
Denver 12 1 13 28
Houston 7 4 11 30
L.A. 15 2 17 24
N.O. 10 3 13 28
OKC 7 7 14 27
Phoenix 10 0 10 31
S.A. 11 4 15 26
Utah 11 4 15 26
 

Dallas, OKC, and Utah lost home games this week..  As last week, L.A. has the fewest remaining home games, Phoenix and Houston the most.

All Away Games

  W L Played Left
Portland 7 8 15 26
Dallas 10 4 14 27
Denver 7 8 15 26
Houston 9 7 16 25
L.A. 7 2 9 32
N.O. 2 11 13 28
OKC 6 6 12 29
Phoenix 8 9 17 24
S.A. 3 6 9 32
Utah 5 7 12 29
 

Before this week, Western playoff contenders overall were 54-57 in road games.  After a 10-11 week, it stands at 64-68.  We had a 1-1 week, right in line with what the group did as a whole, and are hanging close to .500, just as most of the others.  Only Dallas and L.A. have particularly strong road records, only N.O. is really bad.  L.A. and S.A. have the most road games remaining, other than that it is reasonably balanced.

All Games Against Winning Teams

  W L Played Left
Portland 6 8 14 25
Dallas 9 4 13 26
Denver 8 2 10 30
Houston 8 9 17 24
L.A. 8 4 12 29
N.O. 4 9 13 30
OKC 4 11 15 26
Phoenix 5 7 12 26
S.A. 2 9 11 29
Utah 6 8 14 27
 

N.O., Denver, L.A., and S.A. have the most remaining games against winning teams.  This is not particularly good news for the Hornets and Spurs, seeing as they have very poor records against winning teams this year.  OKC does, too, but at least they have fewer of them left.  We don't have huge imbalances in our favor like we did last year at this time, but our schedule isn't as hard as some of the teams that we have to beat out to grab a playoff spot. 

All Games Against Losing Teams

  W L Played Left
Portland 11 4 15 28
Dallas 11 4 15 28
Denver 11 7 18 24
Houston 8 2 10 31
L.A. 14 0 14 27
N.O. 8 5 13 26
OKC 9 2 11 30
Phoenix 13 2 15 29
S.A. 12 1 13 29
Utah 10 3 13 28
 

Denver has the fewest remaining easy games, Houston and OKC the most remaining.  L.A. still hasn't lost to a losing team.  Bizarrely, Denver is 8-2 against winning teams but only 11-7 against losing teams -- so maybe it is to their advantage that most of their remaining games are against tougher competition.   

Back to Back Games Remaining

  Total Cat4 Cat3 Cat2 Cat1
Portland 12 5 4 2 1
Dallas 12 4 3 4 1
Denver 15 5 4 1 5
Houston 15 5 5 1 4
L.A. 14 4 9 0 1
N.O. 11 2 7 2 0
OKC 13 6 3 3 1
Phoenix 14 2 6 3 3
S.A. 13 6 6 0 1
Utah 13 4 3 4 2
 

Notice the Hornets have not only fewer BtoBs than anyone, but fewer Cat 4 BtoBs.  Though S.A. and OKC do not have as many remaining as some other teams, they have more Cat 4s.  We'll get another of our Cat 4 BtoBs out of the way this week.  Of remaining back to backs, the following are the number of games where the other team is on a back to back as well: 

  Total Cat4 Cat3 Cat2 Cat1
Portland 4 0 2 2 0
Dallas 3 0 0 3 0
Denver 5 1 2 0 2
Houston 6 2 1 1 2
L.A. 1 0 0 0 1
N.O. 3 0 2 1 0
OKC 5 1 1 2 1
Phoenix 9 2 2 2 3
S.A. 6 2 3 0 1
Utah 6 2 1 3 0
 

Net, the games where only the Western contender in question is on a back to back:

  Total Cat4 Cat3 Cat2 Cat1
Portland 8 5 2 0 1
Dallas 9 4 3 1 1
Denver 10 4 2 1 3
Houston 9 3 4 0 2
L.A. 13 4 9 0 0
N.O. 8 2 5 1 0
OKC 8 5 2 1 0
Phoenix 5 0 4 1 0
S.A. 7 4 3 0 0
Utah 7 2 2 1 2
 

When you net these out, you can see that in terms of "sole" BtoBs, when a team is on a BtoB and their opponent isn't, the remaining schedule is very kind to Phoenix and not so kind to L.A.  We don't have that many remaining, but the ones we have are tough.  

Now, games where we are not on a back to back, but our opponent is:

  Total Cat4 Cat3 Cat2 Cat1
Portland 5 0 0 2 3
Dallas 10 0 1 5 4
Denver 11 1 0 8 2
Houston 8 0 0 1 7
L.A. 4 2 0 1 1
N.O. 11 2 1 4 4
OKC 6 0 2 3 1
Phoenix 8 0 0 5 3
S.A. 7 0 0 5 2
Utah 10 1 2 2 5
 

Still an advantage for Denver -- most of their difficult home opponents will be tired.  But they cashed in two of those BtoBs with Cat2 wins this week, and still only went 2-2.  Only L.A. gets less help from tired opponents than we do the rest of the way.

The Projections

Here is the vital stuff:  the jscot Stupid Sched Projections. 

Standard Disclaimer:  How these work (if they can be said to work, which is doubtful), and why they are stupid, is explained above or in previous posts.  Do not blame me.  This is only the numbers.  It isn't the spreadsheet's fault, either, the spreadsheet is only doing what it is told to do.  Someone was stupid enough to tell the spreadsheet to do it, but if we want to talk about stupid, you are actually reading this.

Playoff seedings if everyone keeps winning in every category at exactly the same rate for the rest of the season, and if no .500 or better team turns into a losing team, or vice versa.

  1. L.A.  66.5 wins.   
  2. Phoenix.  62.4 wins.  
  3. Dallas.  58.5 wins.
  4. Denver.  57.5 wins.
  5. Houston.  54.4 wins.
  6. Utah.  49.0 wins.
  7. Portland.  48.6 wins.
  8. OKC.  43.4 wins.
  9. S.A.  42.6 wins.
  10. N.O.  39.4 wins.

The spreadsheet likes L.A.'s unbeaten record in Cat 1 and Cat 3, and the Suns' unbeaten record in Cat 2 and Cat 1.  It likes the Mavs' 4-2 record in Cat 4, the only team with a winning record in that category, Denver's unbeaten record in Cat 2, and Houston's unbeaten record in Cat 1.  It doesn't care that much about the Spurs' perfect record in Cat 1 because they've been abysmal in Cat 2 and 4.  It hates the Hornets' 0-8 record in Cat 4, but gives some credit for their 4-1 record in Cat 2 (their only home loss against a winning team was to Portland).

The Coming Week

  1. Portland.  Well, well.  Last week in this spot, I said, "Crisis time."  We're now in "Bonus Time", as we got the two home wins and one road win we needed to get before Christmas.  Even one win this week would make for a decent week, with BtoB Cat 4s at Dallas and S.A., then home on Christmas Day to host Denver -- and we owe those guys one.  Two wins this week would be phenomenal -- and I wouldn't rule that out, since Dirk is not healthy and S.A. can't beat good teams.  The spreadsheet only projects about 1.1 wins for us this week, so getting even one would be decent.
  2. Dallas.  Jawbreaker (do they really want to play more of those?) Cat 2 at home vs. Portland, then a Cream Puff at home vs. Memphis, before out on the road for a Cat 4 BtoB at Denver. 
  3. Denver.  Open with a Cat 2 Jawbreaker at home vs. Atlanta (Hawks on a BtoB), then out for a Cat 4 Rocky Road at Portland.  Then, home for another Cat 2 Jawbreaker (Dallas, on a BtoB).  That will be four straight Cat 2s where the opponent was on a BtoB for the Nugs -- and their blogger actually complains about their schedule!  
  4. Houston.  Two more BtoBs, with two days rest in between.  Open with a Cream Puff against the Clips at home (Clips on a BtoB), then on the Rocky Road at Orlando (BtoB), then a Cat 3 Banana Peel at NJ, and finally another Cat 4 BtoB at Cleveland.  
  5. L.A.  Back home for two Cat 2s, OKC and Cleveland, then a Cat 3 Banana Peel at Sacramento (BtoB). 
  6. N.O.  The Hornets have a chance to finally climb back to .500, with two games, a Cat 1 Cream Puff at home vs. G.S., then a Cat 3 Banana Peel at Chicago.  They'd best get these, it is about to get tougher next week. 
  7. The "Blunder".  Likely to see the wrong side of .500 after a disappointing week this week.  Open with back to back Cat 4 Rocky Roads against L.A. and Phoenix, then a Cream Puff against Charlotte.  A bad week won't mean they are done, they have some easier games ahead. 
  8. Phoenix.  They open with two Cat 2 Jawbreakers at home (OKC, Cleveland), with both rivals on the second of a back to back.  Then, they have their own BtoB, starting at home with a Cream Puff against the Clips and then going to G.S. for a dangerous BtoB Cat 3 Banana Peel.
  9. S.A.  An opportunity to make a move.  A Cat 1 at home vs. the Clips, then a Cat 2 Jawbreaker hosting Portland (Blazers on a BtoB).  Then, out on the road with back to back Cat 3 Banana Peels at the Bucks and the Knicks.  They are 12-1 against losing teams, and get three of them this week -- and the fourth game is Portland on the fourth in five nights.  They will be disappointed with anything less than four wins. 
  10. Utah.  The Jazz will look at their schedule, and say, "At least we don't have to play Minnesota this week!"  Two Cat 4s, at Orlando and Miami, then a Cat 1 at home against Philly.  

Clearly, the arrival of Tolliver has jumpstarted the team, and we're rolling again.  Despite the clunker at Orlando, which you know would be a tough one to get in any circumstances, we're looking like a playoff team again.  Some of those early losses, and of course the injuries, have reduced our margin for error considerably, but we're not done yet, Rudy should be back in a few weeks, and perhaps Nic a few weeks later.

Go, Blazers!

Comment 12 comments  |  18 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Well done jscot, well done

It will be very interesting to see where we are at this time next week.

For everyone else – rec’s all around for the spreadsheet jscot! You are puffing the wrong work if you miss this real analysis treasure each week. Show some appreciation please.

"I could almost fall asleep when he's got the ball," Demopoulos said of Roy. "That's how comfortable I feel with him. He always comes through."

by lee3022 on Dec 21, 2009 12:12 PM PST reply actions  

:)

Recs are dangerous in the presence of an over-inflated ego. Explosions may ensue….

#52

by jscot on Dec 21, 2009 12:29 PM PST up reply actions  

Ah, more recs than comments - the true sign of a jscot post.

I did one of each, so I’m not part of the problem.

You can measure skill and talent with your eyes, but productivity is shown through statistics.

by austinpwnz on Dec 21, 2009 1:19 PM PST reply actions  

I only rec'ed

so I AM part of the problem.

"One of the bright spots of the young season has been rookie point guard Jonny Flynn, whose name sounds like he should be the lead character in a Broadway Musical. "What are you doing here, Jonny Flynn?" "Why I'm here to court trouble, and woo a girl, and build the most fantastical contraption the world has ever seen!" -- Dave, Game 7 Blazers versus Timberwolves preview

by BlazersOrBust on Dec 21, 2009 5:49 PM PST up reply actions  

The Portland projection feels about right

It is probably a bit overly kind in the near term as we cope with all the injuries, but will be a bit too harsh to us as the boys start returning to action. Hope we don’t completely wear out Roy and LMA over the next month.

If we could put together a nice run in the spring and get up to number 6, I think it is possible we could make it interesting.

In the short term I am watching for improvement from Webster and Bayless.

Thanks as always for these great posts, Jscot.

by upper left corner on Dec 21, 2009 6:09 PM PST reply actions  

Our projection

counts all the wins we got when we were healthy. Remains to be seen if we can maintain when we aren’t. Right now, I’m thinking we’re more likely to be around 45-46 wins, but the Miami game gave me hope. If we can grab two wins this week, I’d put my guess up a few wins.

I don’t think 50 is out of the question, but we’ll have to play really well and make Portland a fortress.

#52

by jscot on Dec 22, 2009 12:01 AM PST up reply actions  

props

that’s pretty cool. I like the disclaimer, too. Being the optimistic citizen of rip city that I am, however, I’m thinking we beat the spreadsheet this week. Split in Texas, then a win at home against division archrival scum (nothing personal, nuggies)? It could happen. Is the spreadsheet a betting spreadsheet? Will it give me 2-1.1 odds? TWO DOLLAHS!

by Chadillac5000 on Dec 21, 2009 11:33 PM PST reply actions  

I read the disclaimer.

Do I get a generalization?

You can measure skill and talent with your eyes, but productivity is shown through statistics.

by austinpwnz on Dec 22, 2009 12:51 AM PST up reply actions  

Rec

but if we want to talk about stupid, you are actually reading this.

I resemble this remark!

When you find a big kettle of crazy, it's best not to stir it!

by blazerfrog on Dec 22, 2009 11:12 AM PST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

The ultimate coverage and analysis of the Portland Trail Blazers.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
The Blazers Future Regarding Free Agent Signings
Small
Thunderous Manboobies
Img_0878_1__small
Why do we hate LaMarcus Aldridge?
Small
Oregonlive "journalists" 2 new posts...same old drivel
2474796688_7cdc78828f_o_small
Greg Oden Suffers Life-Ending Injury; Gets 3-Year Extension

Recent FanPosts

Small
WHAT TO DO WITH NIC BATUM BECAUSE WE WILL LOSE HIM IF NOT TRADED.
Small
Trade that helps us out now and the future
Small
How can the All-Star game be more fun and competitive?
Small
Earl Boykins!
Small
LaMarcus Aldridge about to become the 10th highest scorer in Blazers franchise  history
Small
New trade that gets us a new point and a three point shooter
Small
Portland getting.....
Small
The Sun Behind the Clouds: Blazers still on track.
Blazers_small
What are we missing?

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

FanShots

Quick hits of video, photos, quotes, chats, links and lists that you find around the web.

Recommended FanShots

Double rainbow of sadness:

1) JBay is getting shorter
2) We never got to see him with a mustache

I miss you tiny raptor man.

via The Basketball Jones http://blogs.thescore.com/tbj/2012/02/09/things-of-note-for-february-9-2012/#more-34561
Blazers Broadcasters Mike Barrett and Mike Rice re-enacted NBA referee Scott Foster's controversial goaltending call on Portland Trail Blazers forward LaMarcus Aldridge, who was defending Oklahoma City Thunder All-Star forward Kevin Durant, during this week's edition of Blazers Courtside. Remarkably, no one was injured during the taping of this segment.

Original video of the play here. 
Quotes from the players and coaches here. 
The NBA admitting it got the call wrong here. 
Dave's  extended thoughts here. 
BlazersMakr's FanShot: Major Vegas action on OKC prior to tip here. 
Audio of Chad Doing of 750 AM The Game going HAM on Foster here.

OK, that should just about wrap up the goaltending discussion.

Courtside video via Blazers Broadcasting cameraman John Curry.

-- Ben Golliver | benjamin.golliver@gmail.com | Twitter
In 2008 Tim Donaghy indicated that Scott Foster was a ref that also fixed games
Blazers Owner Paul Allen Ranked No. 3 American Philanthropist In 2011
Rhino

Recent FanShots

LaMarcus Aldridge Needs Support Around Him
LaMarcus Aldridge Finds Out He's An All-Star With His Teammates
Congratulations to Portland Trail Blazers forward LaMarcus Aldridge, on his first All Star selection.

As seen on www.trailblazers.com
AWoj: Aldridge an All Star
It's pretty clear that the season is over already ;)
CRAZY stat from Houston game
NBA MVP Rankings... LMA @ #10
Celtics interested in Rondo - Gasol swap? ...
Batum - Top 10 NBA Sixth Men

+ New FanShot All FanShots >


Editors

Kitten_small Dave

Headshotsmall_small Ben Golliver

Lead Moderators

Getfuzzy-satchel_small Timmay!

Bucky3_small Cablinasian

Authors

Plainlc_small Storyteller

Moderators

Lamb_small T Darkstar

Small douglast

Terryporter_small prezofdeath

Small usmcr3049

Lrg_magpie_small Corvid

Wallpaper_small geoffm