Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Jerry Sandusky's Wife Tries To Run A Reporter Over

Sein und Zeit und Blazers

Memory is a tricky thing, as can be demonstrated by trending in sarcastic fanposts here in the sidebar. After the Chicago blowout, we had the “The Blazerz Really Suk Lolz” congratulatory trend, followed almost immediately by the “So Glad We Paid Roy SMH” fanposts. Memory, therefore, is a hindrance to meaning—the more it can be manipulated the more that structural cohesion in our opinions can be maintained. Thankfully, this is not an exercise intended to make us remember our own individual or collective hypocrisies; such an argument would no doubt just illuminate my own contradictions. Instead, I want to ask how we remember sports, and how we contribute to a collective sports memory.

Star-divide

I began thinking about this by wondering how it was I came to love the Blazers. Like so many here, I inherited the team from family. If anyone were to ask me why I am a Blazers fan, my answer would probably be “I grew up in Portland.” The statement, if examined linguistically, actually has very little to do with the questions. Portland is well known for its beer selection as well, but when people ask why I drink beer I rarely answer with facts about my upbringing. In short, the “I am from the city of my favorite sports team” statement does a lot of cultural heavy-lifting, and allows us shortcuts that eliminate the necessity to interrogate how and why basketball came to mean what it did, how it did.

So how did I come to “know” about the Blazers? If I try to summon my “first Blazer memory,” like almost all here, I have a fuzzy recollection of an experience in the coliseum. I distinctly remember the feeling that these men were much taller than I expected, and that basketball games were sweaty on all fronts. Again, I would guess this makes me extremely similar to many of the participants on this site. The key problem with this recollection, though, is that it is a lie. Although I’m sure visual and mental imprints from the day I went to my first game remain with me, calling this my first memory denies the groundwork that preceded it—the years I spent observing my father and mother talk about sports, the years I was learning how to be a sports fan. No doubt, the hours I listened silently to my father and my uncle argue over the various positives and negatives associated with bringing back LaRue Martin preceded my “first memory” in an important structural way. My guess would be, by the time I actually experienced my “first Blazer memory,” I had already learned in an unconscious sense how to remember sports.

Why is this important? Well, it may not be. But what remains curious to me is that the structure of the forgetting that allows the myth of the “first memory” to function is the same structure that makes sports discourse so narrow. In order to further explicate what I mean when I say that, I need to define terms as I intend to use them. Having in a previous fanpost explicitly stating my desire to avoid going all Saussure on everyone, I hope to explore synchronic and diachronic trends in a Bakhtinian sense. By using the word synchronic in reference to sports discourse, what I refer to is the trend that leads to the “first memory” phenomenon. This could also be called the “top plays” trend, in that it supports an emphasis on specific moments in time freed of their historicity. I would argue that the way that certain moments get repeated ad nauseum (Dr. J’s behind the backboard flip, MJ’s hand-switch lay-up, Magic’s baby hook, etc.) represent a structure of memory that demands only the manipulation of “key moments” and nothing more. The visual medium may contribute to this impetus in an actual way. When one sees the MJ hand-switch, especially when you crop the background out (as the NBA did in their “finals” montage”) one loses the realization that there was no reason for MJ to switch hands on that shot. Even this small tweak to the cultural memory of that moment allows for a historicization of the highlight that begins to interrogate what a narrative investigation of Jordan’s career might uncover.

The opposite, then, a diachronic approach, would include a historical strategy in order to place key moments and highlights in a context that granted fluidity to sports memory. At certain points, Bill Simmons attempts writing from this angle, working hard to go back in time and question assumptions within the collective memory of the NBA in order to frame key moments in the context of new questions. (Side note: this is why it’s so hilarious to me that Simmons castigates English majors. Is there better proof in the world that Lacan’s assertion that the letter returns to the sender in it’s “true, inverted form” is correct? But I digress). Even in the best kind of diachronic sports writing, though, the urge to retreat into synchronic analysis cannot be avoided. Almost invariably writers use the commonplace, “that was the moment everything changed” trope, effectively crumbling any narrative historical structure under the prestige of the highlight mentality.

This all leads me to ask whether a diachronic analysis is possible. At first I thought maybe the structure of the human memory, coupled with the emphasis on visual media, would make synchronicity intractable. But then I began to think about two possible modes. The first is statistical analysis, which has the ability to reach into the past and collect averages which would, at this form of analysis’ best moments, account for key trends throughout history. However, the prestige of the single moment is again at work here as the statistician always projects his work into the single moment—or, as unfortunately is the trend today, a single equation—that creates meaning synchronically.

The second mode is more promising. It is the digital archive. Going back to my first paragraph, I think it would be very interesting to look specifically through the BE archives in order to investigate what had been written, and, more interestingly, what had been rec’ed over the course of the years the site has been active. In this way, one could conceivably “remember” what the mind forgets in order to maintain synchronicity.  But would a narrative emerge, or would the inevitable contradictions present nothing more than petty arguments over who said what when?

The questions still plagues me, but it doesn’t have to plague you. I would really like to see people share their own “first memory,” and whether or not they think this really is where it begins, or whether they were already trained in a way to know how to talk about where it all begin.

Furthermore, any thoughts on the synchronic/diachronic impasse would be very appreciated, as my curse is a mind that produces more questions than it ever could answer.

Comment 83 comments  |  14 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Is this about stop complaining?

Love Nate, give Blake a chance? I need headers or bullets. This is why I left college.

by jiminut on Dec 2, 2009 12:09 PM PST reply actions   1 recs

This is easily the single best fanpost I've ever read on this site.

huge rec for you.

To your question, I think my earliest Blazer memory is Danny Young hitting a mid court shot against the Pistons that got waived off. I remember thinking that call was horribly wrong.

Whether or not that’s “where it all began” for me in terms of how I remember is unknown to me. But I would say that the synchronic way of remembering is true of nearly all sports fans. Part of this is because there is just so much to remember. The mind almost has to whittle it down to a few highlights to hold it all. I don’t remember everything from the buzzer beater against Houston last year, but I will always remember Brandon Roy launching the shot and seeing the net splash. I’ll remember the highlight until I die. But the context of the shot in relation to that particular season/team/or upwards trend for the Blazers as a basis for the memory or as part of an overall narrative will not be there for me as years pass. Sure, it’s there now, so I suppose it is a building block, but that will fade and in time the memory will just be the highlight.

Great topic.

If the glory can be killed, we are lost. --John Steinbeck

by DrivetheLane on Dec 2, 2009 12:18 PM PST reply actions  

she's near the top of my Bedger list.

that’s for sure. i’m really hoping she makes her paper on season 2 of The Wire available.

If the glory can be killed, we are lost. --John Steinbeck

by DrivetheLane on Dec 2, 2009 1:49 PM PST up reply actions  

haha. so it's win win for me?

If the glory can be killed, we are lost. --John Steinbeck

by DrivetheLane on Dec 2, 2009 2:02 PM PST up reply actions  

I’ll make it available, you win. Just give me time to clean it up a little. Like always, I’m embarrassed of everything I wrote more than six months ago.

"I could have done with other loves perhaps. But there it is, either you love or you don't" -SB

by nightbluefruit on Dec 2, 2009 6:17 PM PST up reply actions  

cool.

i’m embarrassed of everything i’ve written ever.

If the glory can be killed, we are lost. --John Steinbeck

by DrivetheLane on Dec 2, 2009 7:09 PM PST up reply actions  

I’m a reverse narcissist. When I know something is from me, I love it. Then I forget that I made it and read it critically.

"I could have done with other loves perhaps. But there it is, either you love or you don't" -SB

by nightbluefruit on Dec 2, 2009 7:24 PM PST up reply actions  

haha.

i’m the opposite. i make it with a critical eye and hate it. then if i manage to finish, when i re-read it later, i sometimes go, “hey that’s not half bad!”

If the glory can be killed, we are lost. --John Steinbeck

by DrivetheLane on Dec 3, 2009 8:28 AM PST up reply actions  

that Danny Young shot was in the Finals

And I remember it well. Bah! – Elgin

Travis Outlaw, the Funnel Cake of the Blazers

by 22baylor on Dec 2, 2009 4:04 PM PST up reply actions  

OMG, that's my first memory too!

I’m not even kidding. I caught the end of that game and instantly became a fan. Even converting my family into fans since no one either new much of the Blazers or was a fan before.

We are forever bonded :)

by bustabucket on Dec 2, 2009 4:14 PM PST up reply actions  

Geez...that was my early memory

I think I’m forever scarred by it.

"I'm at the thingamajig talking the yakety-yak" - Kenny Smith

by blzrfan on Dec 2, 2009 4:48 PM PST up reply actions  

Were you at the game?

I was and believe I will remember all that led up to that moment…for the rest of my life. This is because I was at the game. Enough adrenaline in your system and that memory will be imprinted.

by Natsthecat on Dec 5, 2009 5:37 PM PST up reply actions  

i like ur writing

u are talented and this you bring up a very important and relevant point.

but who cares? I just want my favorite basketball team to win.

s

The Princess of Blazersedge

It just takes an iron fist to keep the riff raff under control and her princess hand is mad strong- Idoltime

by BlazerFan1 on Dec 2, 2009 12:24 PM PST reply actions  

Kanye?

I get the paper, so I don't care!

by Name's Ash on Dec 2, 2009 12:28 PM PST up reply actions  

I care

and I’d rather read this than another Fire Nate post

by The Arkitect on Dec 2, 2009 12:28 PM PST up reply actions   1 recs

you joking?

maybe you’d rather read more “start miller/fire nate/trade so and so” posts.

If the glory can be killed, we are lost. --John Steinbeck

by DrivetheLane on Dec 2, 2009 1:19 PM PST up reply actions  

You 3 are soo quick to jump to the fanpost's defense!

GAH! and i thought this thread, indeed this post, was the best ever! Refreshing departure from the mindless repetition of who starts when where and how in the side bar!

NBF knows whats up.

So yes, I’ll tip my hat and raise my glass to this excellent post, but really, how is this thread any different?

S

The Princess of Blazersedge

It just takes an iron fist to keep the riff raff under control and her princess hand is mad strong- Idoltime

by BlazerFan1 on Dec 2, 2009 2:13 PM PST up reply actions  

Worst Fanpost Ever!!!

and I don’t recall any other “worst fanpost ever” in BE history…

(silent rec)

lets go brandon!!!!

by broyposse on Dec 2, 2009 1:20 PM PST reply actions  

BE ate my homework

I was writing something about instant gratification, and about people being bad at judging slow long-term developments which is why we overvalue short-term positive developments (like getting more money, or a team winning one big game) and underestimate long-term negative effects. Which is why fans never expect their teams and players to do bad or get hurt, and why banks suck at risk management because not even the theoretical models can capture the total breakdown much less people would expect it. It was such a nice post :-(

But well done NBF.

Ceterum censeo Lakers esse delendam

by Norsktroll on Dec 2, 2009 1:38 PM PST reply actions  

Please Post It!

I would love to be Leibniz to your Newton, or vice-versa. Whichever you prefer.

Also, i can only imagine that your post would clarify and specify what I’ve presented here as an oblique and generalized idea.

"I could have done with other loves perhaps. But there it is, either you love or you don't" -SB

by nightbluefruit on Dec 2, 2009 6:18 PM PST up reply actions  

On a (related?) side note

I’d love to see a trained historian write about a basketball team and compare that to how journalists write. Because sports journalism (and maybe our memories?) are all about the synchronic Big Moment, that approach does seem to rule.

Historians deal with this frequently in figuring out how to write about the past. They don’t always get it right, but I think there’s more awareness of what’s going on when it comes to both individual and cultural memory. They’re also, often, dealing with a much messier collection of material to work with that we’ve got with NBA basketball, and trying to come with some coherent analysis of events. Having all the statistics, video replay, and then written material from journalists and blogs to compare it to with the benefit of a level head and some hindsight would be a gold mine.

It’s maybe a different tangent, but might relate a bit to what Norsktroll was going to write. Either way I’d love to read the discussion!

And which one of you is Leibniz?

by HowlinJoeWolf on Dec 2, 2009 7:05 PM PST up reply actions  

killer screen name

Joe Wolf ain’t superstitious, but a black cat crossed his trail. – Elgin

Travis Outlaw, the Funnel Cake of the Blazers

by 22baylor on Dec 3, 2009 4:07 PM PST up reply actions  

Don't sweep Joe Wolf with no broom

- he just might get put in jail.

And I wish for the sake of this thread that someone’s first Blazer memory was when short-lived Blazer center/lovable stiff Joe Wolf would come in the game during the 1992/1993 season, and the fans would all yell: “A-hooooooooo!” He was like a less-talented Joel Przybilla with a catchphrase. And a Tom Chambers haircut. Sadly, Joe Wolf did not make it into the halls of eternal Blazer lore, and to go with NBF’s analysis, I’m guessing is mostly on the cutting room floor these days of our collective team memory. Deep down I think he always wanted to be a killer bluesman, so I’m going with that.

by HowlinJoeWolf on Dec 3, 2009 5:58 PM PST up reply actions   1 recs

rec

Travis Outlaw, the Funnel Cake of the Blazers

by 22baylor on Dec 4, 2009 12:51 PM PST up reply actions  

U rite real good

I wish I cud yooze big wurds like u.

by zbrum on Dec 2, 2009 1:45 PM PST reply actions  

3 memories

I didn’t grow up in Portland or in a big basketball household, so my first memory of the Blazers was that they some obscure team from Maine getting steamrolled by the inevitability of the Jordan dynasty.

After I enrolled in Oregon in the fall of 1999, my next memory that stands out to me was the 2000 WCF, and I realized that many of my friends and acquaintances were actually FANS of this otherwise obscure franchise. Strangely…. I have a similar sensation regarding everyone’s universal frustration with Telfair….

The third major memory for me was of watching Outlaw hit the runner at the buzzer against Memphis (two years ago tomorrow) – the shot that started the streak – and I realized that I had become a fan.

Two points scored by GO’ = "thunderdunk"

by T$ 225 on Dec 2, 2009 1:56 PM PST reply actions  

So, I can't tell. Do you think Nate should be fired or not?

To be honest, I’ve been racking my brain for a Blazer “first memory” and I don’t have one. I have no idea whether this is odd or not.

by Corvid on Dec 2, 2009 2:21 PM PST reply actions  

LOL

The Princess of Blazersedge

It just takes an iron fist to keep the riff raff under control and her princess hand is mad strong- Idoltime

by BlazerFan1 on Dec 2, 2009 2:25 PM PST up reply actions  

there are 3 parts of this thread that exemplify precisely what blazersedge has become

1. Junkers : the junk drawer elite. They come in , throw a thread off topic, draw everyone around in and have lengthy conversations. They dont always know much of basketball but like the company of blazersedge.

this is displayed in the top portion of the comments. (this one included, but nevermind that ) ( i am also the guiltiest junker in the history of this site..)

2. the arguing wanna-be elite: these commenters start arguing about ANYTHING, mostly for the sake of arguing and probably to display some intelligence they feel isnt recognized in their real life. (i am also the “arguer”)

this is displayed in the middle portion of the thread of comments. flame away guys

3. THe serious commenters. These are usually found commenting on Dave’s post. They take a question, ponder it and answer it literally, thoughtfully and succinctly .

These comments are at the bottom . (excluding this one and i DO sometimes answer questions seriously but usually not, being seriuos could ruin my rep)

Disregard the fact that I am a hybrid of all these commenting traits ; this post has unintentionally incited the admiriaton/randomness/ire of commenters.

LOL well done

s

The Princess of Blazersedge

It just takes an iron fist to keep the riff raff under control and her princess hand is mad strong- Idoltime

by BlazerFan1 on Dec 2, 2009 2:25 PM PST reply actions   1 recs

Hi Sophia!

It was good to meet you and your bro. If these Blazers start playing competitive ball again (and I think they will) we should catch another game at the neighborhood pub.

"The only 'Advanced Metric' that matters is what you see with your eyes." -Timbo, Nov., 2009.

by Blazin' on Dec 2, 2009 6:22 PM PST up reply actions  

I'm part of the junk drawer lower class.

I don’t know anything about basketball, or enjoy the company of blazersedge.

But I love you :-(
by Mortimer on Nov 19, 2009 7:04 PM PST

by TheTinfoil on Dec 2, 2009 6:34 PM PST up reply actions  

This is interesting

testing my own memory, what I first remember is the Blazers vs. the Pistons in the finals… but I know I watched before that, and I remember watching and learning how to be a fan from my mom… I would also be interested to see if anyone’s “first” sports memory is a negative one… I doubt it as we (fans) always remember the past as better than the present

by The Arkitect on Dec 2, 2009 2:39 PM PST reply actions  

My earliest sports memory is a wispy one of Kirk Gibson's home run of Dennis Eckersley in the World Series, when I was 4.

I have no idea what my earliest Blazer memory is— I have basically no timeline for all my Drexler era Blazer memories.

'Cuse 88-Cornell 73. My Big Red failed to beat the spread by 2 points. Hence the new avatar.

by jksnake99 on Dec 2, 2009 2:57 PM PST up reply actions  

my earliest sports memory over-all centers on Dallas for some reason, I had an odd fascination with Fat Lever as a child… I also remember watching the cowboys be horrible when i was really little and being so pissed off about it that I vowed to never root for them again (I only rooted for them in the first place because of a T-shirt I got as a present)

by The Arkitect on Dec 2, 2009 3:03 PM PST up reply actions  

what a sweet moment that was

I was at The Eagles fraternal organization bar in Canby, waiting to start playing some rockabilly music. I will never forget that moment. – Elgin

Travis Outlaw, the Funnel Cake of the Blazers

by 22baylor on Dec 2, 2009 4:01 PM PST up reply actions  

what a horrible first memory

smh

"Your best?!?!! Losers always whine about their best. Winners go home and &^%@ the prom queen"

2008 Civil War: Oregon 65 - Oregon State 38

by cloudydays on Dec 2, 2009 4:21 PM PST up reply actions   1 recs

I was not yet a Giants fan, or indeed a fan of any MLB team.

'Cuse 88-Cornell 73. My Big Red failed to beat the spread by 2 points. Hence the new avatar.

by jksnake99 on Dec 2, 2009 6:38 PM PST up reply actions  

Is the memory then the first time you remember being yourself interested in a sporting event, or your first memory of a sporting event that you interpreted as being important?

"I could have done with other loves perhaps. But there it is, either you love or you don't" -SB

by nightbluefruit on Dec 2, 2009 6:42 PM PST up reply actions  

It was the first time I remember being interested in a sporting event.

'Cuse 88-Cornell 73. My Big Red failed to beat the spread by 2 points. Hence the new avatar.

by jksnake99 on Dec 2, 2009 8:08 PM PST up reply actions  

Is it even possible for you to think about why it was interesting, or is that too hopeful of me?

"I could have done with other loves perhaps. But there it is, either you love or you don't" -SB

by nightbluefruit on Dec 2, 2009 8:10 PM PST up reply actions  

For me that might be the 1988 Olympics, especially the opening ceremony and the 100 m final between Carl Lewis and Ben Johnson. Which now lives in infamy, but at that time seeing those big guys run so fast seemed very exciting. I have probably seen a number of sporting events before, but not on such a big stage. So I can’t remember them anymore.

Ceterum censeo Lakers esse delendam

by Norsktroll on Dec 2, 2009 9:25 PM PST up reply actions  

I basically learned to read by reading the sports page.

I was obsessed with sports as early as I can remember. That game was the first time I remember watching a professional sporting event and having a pretty decent understanding of what was going on. That made it important.

'Cuse 88-Cornell 73. My Big Red failed to beat the spread by 2 points. Hence the new avatar.

by jksnake99 on Dec 2, 2009 10:55 PM PST up reply actions  

you are reading my childhood to me. I read the sports page EVERY DAY, front to back, back to front, usually reading it twice. I read the box scores about 2-3 times to make sure to catch all the stats.

It was so cool… a world of big guys playing a sport that was fun to watch and fun to read about. More importantly, I loved the stats, though I didn’t know why at the time.

i cry for nic

by Cablinasian on Dec 2, 2009 11:10 PM PST up reply actions  

me too

I read Jim Murray’s column every day and understood about half of them. – Elgin

Travis Outlaw, the Funnel Cake of the Blazers

by 22baylor on Dec 3, 2009 4:08 PM PST up reply actions  

rec

I was living in Berkeley and was a huge A’s fan. Listened to on the radio, watched on TV, or saw in person every game of that season. The A’s were stacked with talent at every position. They had Canseco, McGwire, Ricky Henderson, and many more great hitters and fielders. Starting pitching was decent, the bullpen fantastic. I hate the Dodgers.

by CatMan2 on Dec 3, 2009 1:15 AM PST up reply actions  

haters gonna hate

that was an amazing A’s team, and a remarkable performance by the Dodgers. – Elgin

Travis Outlaw, the Funnel Cake of the Blazers

by 22baylor on Dec 3, 2009 4:08 PM PST up reply actions  

I hear that

but, no. – Elgin

Travis Outlaw, the Funnel Cake of the Blazers

by 22baylor on Dec 4, 2009 12:51 PM PST up reply actions  

My first basketball memory, having grown up in Michigan, was of that same Pistons team in the previous year’s finals. I was always most excited, and can remember most clearly, when Vinnie “the microwave” Johnson would come into the game. He would shoot these atrocious line drive three pointers with no arc at all. It seemed like they always went in, ricocheting off the back iron and up court again through the net.

I remember thinking that Dominic Wilkins, Michael Jordan, and Clyde Drexler were all really cool, but I liked my team with the back to back championships just fine.

My team went to the playoffs in my first year.

by pxilpooshr on Dec 2, 2009 3:34 PM PST up reply actions  

This really interests me. How do you place your switch from the Pistons to the Blazers? Especially given that the Blazers were involved in a negative sense in one of your earlier and happier Pistons memories?

"I could have done with other loves perhaps. But there it is, either you love or you don't" -SB

by nightbluefruit on Dec 2, 2009 6:20 PM PST up reply actions  

In my mind the role of Grant Hill is being played by Brandon Roy.

I never saw either the Lakers or the Blazers as the enemy. The Western conference didn’t really matter. Probably because in my mind it was a foregone conclusion that the Pistons would win once they got to the finals. The struggles that seemed to matter were all in the eastern conference. The Celtics, Knicks and although it seemed lesser at the time, the Bulls were the enemy.

After the bad boys I was a fan of Grant Hill. He seemed like a really decent person. Uncommon during the Jordan effect. A bright spot in Detroit during the dark times. But Grant was often injured, and the team didn’t get off the ground.Of course it was hard not to get drawn into the Bull’s run during the 90s. I was going to school in Chicago then. Mostly I tuned out basketball. Watching only the finals series, or the occasional Bulls game in a bar.

The first week I spent in Portland looking for an apartment was during the 2000 WCF. I knew of Pippen of course. And I was entranced by Sheed’s undeniable charisma. I watched from my hotel room as the Blazers choked a 15 point lead. The sense of elation turned to outrage I felt, even as an outsider, helped me form a bond to the town.

Sheed was traded to my Pistons! Woo hoo! I was pumped. They won one. I knew they would. Then they were robbed by the Heat in the exact same way the Blazers were robbed by the Lakers. Boo Shaq! I’m embellishing.

Then the Rookie Of the Year appeared. It was Grant Hill all over again. A spot light turned onto the Jailblazers. I bought in hook line and sinker.

Although it may seem strange, I can’t wait to see the Blazers stomp Chauncey’s team for the division title this year. I’m a Blazer fan now. Just like I’m a Portland resident. Call me a carpet bagger if you will. I appreciate good ball teams.

My team went to the playoffs in my first year.

by pxilpooshr on Dec 2, 2009 7:38 PM PST up reply actions  

This is really interesting to me. It was a shared negative experience that brought you to the blazers, if I read you right. The same way you had interpreted the Pistons as being robbed by the establishment you interpreted the Blazers getting the short end.

By the way, I hate the whole carpetbagger/bandwagon garbage. I don’t think there’s a good or bad reason to be a fan, even though I am interested in those reasons.

"I could have done with other loves perhaps. But there it is, either you love or you don't" -SB

by nightbluefruit on Dec 2, 2009 8:01 PM PST up reply actions  

I’ve had anti-establishment/father issues since I was little. I root for the ‘Bad Boys’, the ‘Jailblazers’, and the diamond in the rough nice guy who’s just misunderstood. Transparent really.

Nice post by the way. Very thought provoking.

My team went to the playoffs in my first year.

by pxilpooshr on Dec 2, 2009 8:09 PM PST up reply actions  

Everything is transparent if you reduce it to the level of the signifier, even though those signifiers that represent it will inevitably be oblique. Which still doesn’t mean they’re hiding anything.

What I see from your post is a model, the model of taking the side of the lack of advocacy, and repeating it as the model of sports enjoyment. An apparatus of desire, if you want to make it unnecessarily technical. If it really is an anti-establishment/father thing, you could go so far as to say that models of sports memory and pragmatism relate to larger subjective issues. Which is what I always secretly thought anyway.

"I could have done with other loves perhaps. But there it is, either you love or you don't" -SB

by nightbluefruit on Dec 2, 2009 8:13 PM PST up reply actions  

This got me thinking about the last post of yours that I read, asking if it was the winning or the path to winning that one most enjoyed. For me obviously, it’s the path. Particularly when the team is coming up from the dregs. So you see, the Blazers are the perfect team. Until they win… However the Spurs have managed to create a dynasty while still tugging on the underdog heart strings. Must have been their every-other-year plan. Brilliant.

My team went to the playoffs in my first year.

by pxilpooshr on Dec 2, 2009 8:31 PM PST up reply actions  

I don’t think the two posts are unrelated. But as for the previous post, my recent question to my friends has been, if the Blazers beat the Lakers in 7 in the WCF, then beat the Nets in 5 in the finals, which one would you be more excited about?

I follow that up by asking whether or not they would enjoy the WCF win less if the Blazers lost to the Nets.

It’s a good set of questions to make people uncomfortable and loud.

"I could have done with other loves perhaps. But there it is, either you love or you don't" -SB

by nightbluefruit on Dec 2, 2009 8:34 PM PST up reply actions  

Right

Well as you can gather from my previous comment about the Pistons, it’s the conference battles that draw me in more.

Not that I’m an Orlando fan, but I was more excited that they beat the Cavs than I would have been if they had beat the Lakers. Likewise I’d be far more chuffed to see the Blazers beat the Lakers in a WCF than beat the Cavs in a subsequent finals.

I think it’s a bigger deal beating up the bully on your block than the bully from across town.

My team went to the playoffs in my first year.

by pxilpooshr on Dec 2, 2009 8:40 PM PST up reply actions  

Truthfully, I guess I became a Blazer fan when I wasn't allowed to go to

a Blazer game because I was a girl and the the boys would appreciate it more. I consider that my parents were very liberal but I still heard “because he’s a boy” far too often. That was probably also the start of my feminism. Guess who’s the only sibling who follows the Blazers now?

"Aneurysm".

When Outlaw wins a game on a last-second shot, it’s called an "annthefaneurysm". QualityPie

by annthefan on Dec 2, 2009 3:32 PM PST reply actions  

So long as they still think we need protecting, they’ll never notice we’re making all the important decisions.

"I could have done with other loves perhaps. But there it is, either you love or you don't" -SB

by nightbluefruit on Dec 2, 2009 6:20 PM PST up reply actions  

I started following the team in grade school during the 1999-2000 run. My first memory is watching a Laker game with my dad, but having to go to bed before the fourth quarter. I woke up in the morning, sprinted downstairs and waited anxiously for the 6:00 news to tell me who won the game.

The Lakers won. It sucked.

i cry for nic

by Cablinasian on Dec 2, 2009 3:32 PM PST reply actions  

oh, and great fanpost.

i cry for nic

by Cablinasian on Dec 2, 2009 3:32 PM PST up reply actions  

I like the delay in your memory—having to wait overnight for the conclusion for one’s own first memory adds a tiny bit of a temporal strategy to the moment.

My parents were usually considerably strict, but I learned very early on that for matters as important as sporting events, the rules were bendable.

"I could have done with other loves perhaps. But there it is, either you love or you don't" -SB

by nightbluefruit on Dec 2, 2009 6:23 PM PST up reply actions  

Best post I have read in a while.

I remember the Blazers and specific Blazer players before my first memory. At least, my first specific memory. And it shows that synchronic approach vividly. I can remember Kiki Vandeweghe on the team, but not specifically. I couldn’t point out a game and a time or anything else. It’s just a vague impression, just as likely to be a name mentioned as a game watched.

The first point I can remember back to and know when it happened and the events around it is 1990, Game Seven vs the San Antonio Spurs. Both Wayne Cooper and Kevin Duckworth were doubtful for that game. Before the tip, they annouced that Coop could play, but when Duckworth was announced in the starting lineup, everyone, including me went crazy.

The strange thing about memory is that it sometimes puts things together that don’t belong. I had to go look it up, because I had the impression that Portland’s perfect quarter was in that game. It wasn’t, it was the next season (only 6 months later, still 1990) versus the same San Antonio Spurs. But without the diachronic analysis, I would have concluded that those two things belonged together.

Very interesting post. Thank you.

ἰδοὺ ἐνίκησεν ὁ λέων ὁ ἐκ τῆς φυλῆς Ἰούδα, ἡ ῥίζα Δαυείδ...

Καὶ εἶδον ἐν μέσῳ τοῦ θρόνου καὶ τῶν τεσσάρων ζώων καὶ ἐν μέσῳ τῶν πρεσβυτέρων ἀρνίον ἑστηκὼς ὡς ἐσφαγμένον,

Blazersedge.com || New to Blazers' Edge?

by T Darkstar on Dec 2, 2009 3:54 PM PST reply actions  

memories of Kiki

How we gave up so much to get him, and he better be really good, because we gave up so much for him.

Then it turned out that he could score, but not defend. Bah. Bring back Fat Lever and get rid of this guy! (Even though he was a UCLA Bruin, and I liked the Bruins.)

I went to a Blazers vs. Pacers game and there he was guarding Steve Stepanovich of all people. He was way too short, but he couldn’t stay with Chuck Person or whoever else was out there for the Pacers. – Elgin

Travis Outlaw, the Funnel Cake of the Blazers

by 22baylor on Dec 2, 2009 4:07 PM PST up reply actions  

First memory of the Blazers

I was 15 years old and doing my time growing up in Los Angeles, and for some reason, there was an expansion draft that the Lxkers (my favorite team at the time) had to prepare some players for. My team yielded Dick Garrett, a promising young guard who unfortunately played the same position as Jerry West, to the Buffalo Braves; and Johnny Egan, a solid backup point guard, to the Cleveland Cadavaliers. They gave no one up to the Blazers – thank goodness!

This was something I fretted about because in the 1968 expansion draft, the Lxkers gave up Gail Goodrich to the Phoenix Suns. Goodrich was a player I kept close track of, because he played at my high school (JH Francis Polytechnic HS in Sun Valley CA) and had graduated about 10 years before I was scheduled to graduate; and he also played at UCLA for John Wooden’s awesome championship teams. This hit very close to home.

Moreover, the Lakers had lost John Block, a big center/power forward from USC; Henry Finkel, a huge center who could barely move, but hey, he was 7 feet tall; Bob Boozer, who looked like a solid backup for Mr. Baylor at the time; Jim King, a decent backup guard and ball handler; and Walt Hazzard, a very talented guard from UCLA, in previous expansion drafts. So it was difficult to see these young guys get away for nothing.

Other things I knew about the Blazers at that time: They drafted Geoff Petrie who I witnessed as a Princeton player vs. UCLA – he single-handedly gave the Bruins a real challenge that night. They also had Sidney Wicks who I knew from UCLA.

Through the Ramsay years, I pulled for the Blazers but was secure in my knowledge that the Lxkers could be counted on to reach the playoffs and keep the NBA interesting to me, after the Blazers inevitably missed the playoffs or were eliminated in the first round every year. It was a nice contingency plan for me.

When Drexler arrived and we acquired some nice players at the end of the 1980s, including the underrated Steve Johnson, former OSU Beaver, at center, we were suddenly much more competitive and fun to watch. Too bad we hadn’t spent some dough and gotten some players for Ramsay while he was here.

It was only in 1991 when Magic Johnson eliminated the Blazers with the long pass to no one at the other end of the court that the Lxkers finally pissed me off so much that I couldn’t root for them any more. – Not Elgin

Travis Outlaw, the Funnel Cake of the Blazers

by 22baylor on Dec 2, 2009 3:56 PM PST reply actions  

"Wherever you may be"

Like T Darkstar, my early Blazer memories are hard to pin down in specific moments in time.

I have a very early sense of hearing Schonley on the radio. And looking back in hindsight, that had to have been my first exposure to all things Blazers. We either couldn’t afford game tickets or lived too far away, but that radio dial was always tuned in. And during those early years, there wasn’t a TV in the house (so I guess that raises some even more difficult spin-off questions about aural vs. visual memory in the context of these questions about synchronic/diachronic memory. Yikes).

So the idea of “a Blazer game being on”, I think, existed before I can point to specific visual memories. Leaving aside for a moment the visuals that would go in a young child’s head with no visual context for radio phrases like “lickety-brindle-right-up-the-middle”, “climbed the golden ladder!” or “through the cyclops at mid-court” I’m left with memories of wherever I was listening to the game. I can call to mind early living rooms and kitchens, but I can’t pin down a specific time. I can also clearly remember staring at my radio dial and trying to orient a (imaginary) basketball court in my mind when Schonz would say “moving from left to right on your radio dial.” I’m pretty sure I also had a mental image for Fat Lever that didn’t match reality.

Beyond that, it’s really hard to say. As far as visuals go, I remember finally going to some preseason games. And also ultimately seeing games on TV, in pizza parlors, or back when they’d show games at the old Fox Theater. But it all blends together. I remember my brother getting Jim Paxon’s autograph at a local signing, and I remember seeing the Adelman Blazers at their training camp when it was held at Willamette University— it was probably the closest I’d gotten to an actual player, and I was pretty stunned at how enormous they were.

But all of this doesn’t amount to a synchronic, highlight film play. Once the era of the late 80’s and early 90’s Blazers came, those more specific play-of-the-game memories start appearing in bunches. Not coincidentally it was around the time I would have started watching games on TV much more regularly.

I’m not sure this adds much to NBF’s questions, though. Interesting stuff.

by HowlinJoeWolf on Dec 2, 2009 6:29 PM PST reply actions  

I think you’ve added quite a bit.

I would say that you’ve opened my eyes (ha ha joke, though not really funny) to how audible media may have presented more of a positive model of sports fandom than our current visual ones do. For example, you learned nomenclature and were implicate in a circuit with the commentator because he was your amanuensis. Therefore, you had a trusting, mediated relationship with the sport the same as the kind I enjoyed through my relatives. Now, with the visual media as a contrast to the voice and presence of the commentator(s), the commentary becomes a negative presence—in other words, now all anyone does is complain about the role of the broadcast guys.

That doesn’t make them any less important. The message just switches from something like, “here is how to follow a game closely” to something more like “here is what not to be when you are a sports fan.”

"I could have done with other loves perhaps. But there it is, either you love or you don't" -SB

by nightbluefruit on Dec 2, 2009 6:41 PM PST up reply actions  

For what it’s worth, I feel like I had a pretty trusting relationship with the earlier TV broadcast guys, too. Soaking up Steve Jones, even when he was critical, was like being given a free pass to an X’s and O’s clinic. And when he would host “Courtside: Monday Night”, back when they would take the time to have discussions with callers, he was great at taking reactionary fan statements and giving them substantial answers. Come to think of it, he was basically the pre-Dave Deckard.

Also, I think with any, say, 12-16 year old fan there’s a progression from just being excited when you’re supposed to be— Drexler with the jam!— to finding flaws of the “why didn’t they just foul there?!” kind. I wonder if you did get a survey of people’s first Blazer memories, how many are of positive plays vs. negative ones, and how they relate to their age at the time.

by HowlinJoeWolf on Dec 2, 2009 6:55 PM PST up reply actions  

My first memories aren't fan memories

When I was in 5th grade (1981), NBA playing cards were really popular, and I remember a Jim Paxson card floating through my life.

Then in 7th and 8th grade (1983-ish), I babysat for a family who had season tickets. I was happy to make money, never gave a single thought to the actual basketball.

I lived in Massachusetts in 1990, and I tried to follow them via the paper, for civic pride reasons, but all the west coast games finished too late to make the paper.

I moved back to Portland in 2004, and I would be mad every time KGW preempted regular programming with a Blazer game.

Yes, my fandom was an E-X-T-R-E-M-E-L-Y slow progression. Actually, I take that back, it was very fast, it just took years and years and years to start.

by Section323 on Dec 2, 2009 7:42 PM PST reply actions  

Can you compare it to other “new” experiences? For instance, people usually experience a bit of alienation when they begin going out to bars, as they familiarize themselves with the conventions of the culture. Are there any similar moments in your long yet fierce journey to fandom?

"I could have done with other loves perhaps. But there it is, either you love or you don't" -SB

by nightbluefruit on Dec 2, 2009 8:03 PM PST up reply actions  

well, first, to possibly address your main issue in the original post

for me there’s definitely no “first memory” or “memory that changes everything.” Unless of course you count the fundraiser that got me to my first Blazer game. The Blazers are a blur of memories that run through my childhood in continuous but very fuzzy fashion.

As to your post in response to mine, I’m still learning the conventions. I didn’t know what the five positions were until last year, can finally recognize a pick when I see it, but still not so sure about the “roll.” That might just be because the Blazers never complete the roll, but I digress.

I know “sports fan” conventions, as I was a huge SF Giants fan from age 6 to about 25, but not basketball fan conventions.

by Section323 on Dec 2, 2009 8:58 PM PST up reply actions  

The earliest sports teams that I became fans of

were because my friends were fans. It was mostly about a shared experience. To this day I have maintained a sentimental attachment, if not an actual rooting affiliation, to those teams, the exception being the Steelers for whom I still root mainly because I was in a class once with Franco Harris. Of such random occurrences are affiliations born.

Now in my childhood fandom I did not necessarily root for the same teams my friends rooted for. Each buddy seemed to have their own team, and since the local team actually stank – the 1950s and 60s Phillies, they were kind of up for grabs. But it didn’t last. Once I realized that the people I was trying to impress were douchebags, I pretty much forgot about the Phillies. That was about the same time that Richie Allen pushed his hand through a headlight, so it was convenient anyway.

As an adult I find that I enjoy the adrenaline rush that comes with letting ones self get caught up in the winning or losing, and I enjoy, after the game the cries of joy and/or howls of anguish emitted by the faithful. It’s a form of group identification in a world that has sorely limited opportunities for real tribal affiliations, which I think are a basic human need.

But the sad truth we all share is that we are losers living vicariously through our heros. That’s why we hate them so much when they fail. It makes us realize that we have let ourselves down. Their losses and humiliations are literally, not figuratively, our own writ large. Their victories are fleeting and hollow and leave us craving more because we know, they are only images of victory and not victory itself.

by raoulduke on Dec 2, 2009 10:30 PM PST reply actions  

Reading the rest of the things here, I’d say that my love for sports boils down to a few things: (1) my undeniable love at a young age for statistics, and (2) the fact that sport was the arena which my dad and I did together. I grew to like sports and care about sports because he liked and cared about sports.

I go to the UW now but my heart still pulls for Oregon State. Why? I feel like my childhood and relationship with my dad revolved around Oregon State football, and that’s meaningful to me.

Anyway… this has been really thought-provoking content. Some people root to root against the establishment, some fans root because the environment around them roots for the team, some fans root because they want to be associated with a winner, and Clipper fans are masochists.

i cry for nic

by Cablinasian on Dec 2, 2009 11:16 PM PST reply actions  

First solid memory that I can recall whenever I want is

Losing the last game against the Mavs in the playoffs. We had been down 0-3 and forced a game 7. It was my favorite player’s last game. I can “remember” other stuff, like I know I cried during the 2000 incident, but I can’t visualize it.

"Oden is a man among cub scouts."
by Tyrusmancrush on Nov 23, 2009 9:08 PM PST

by Sabonis4Ever on Dec 3, 2009 12:39 AM PST reply actions  

My first basketball memory

was a feeling of empathy for the difficulty Naismith was experiencing while attempting to nail up the peach basket.

If this Blazer team doesn't light your fire, then your wood is wet!

by TwoDeep on Dec 3, 2009 10:18 AM PST reply actions  

The first memory is a tough one

I really can’t remember any specific memories before Damon got here, just feelings about the team. The first Blazer teams I watched were the early ’90s teams and I remember loving Ainge and Kersey, but no real specifics from the era. I remember being dismayed when we traded Clyde for a guy I had barely heard of (good old Otis), and when we got Damon because he was from Oregon, along with a few other moves, but I have very few memories of games in the Strickland-Rider era, or even the early Sheed/Sabas years. There are some fleeting memories of Sabas tossing a no look over the head pass to a cutting Damon (maybe Bonzi?) for a layup that I thought was the greatest play ever, but that might have been because I was able to pull it off in a pickup game like a week later.

Sadly, the one play ingrained in my mind as a Blazer fan over the years was Sean Elliott’s shot in game 2 of the WCF in 1999. Watching Sheed run at him at full stretch, yelling that he was out of bounds, watching his heels come so agonizingly close to the ground on the replays. Just an awful experience, made even worse by the fact that I discussed that shot with a Spurs fan friend of mine last year who was positively giddy about his memories of it.

The 4th quarter in 2000 stands out some, but more just being with the people I was watching it with and the slow despair that came watching that quarter. I couldn’t really name specific plays in it (subconsciously blocked out the trauma).

by Royster on Dec 3, 2009 10:20 AM PST reply actions  

I remember a goaltend… and when that goaltend happened, I knew we were going to lose.

It sucked.

i cry for nic

by Cablinasian on Dec 3, 2009 4:09 PM PST up reply actions  

Funes the Memorious by Borjas

It’s a short story that I highly recommend. The main character, Funes, can remember every detail of everything that he ever experienced, but he knows nothing. We shouldn’t be critical that we simplify sensations, emphasizing some and de-emphasizing or forgetting others. That’s what intelligence does to put structure and understanding on things.

by keephopealive on Dec 3, 2009 3:29 PM PST reply actions  

I inadvertently brought up my first NBA memory in the JD without even linking it to your post, which I must confess I hadn’t read (only because I wanted to give it the time and attention it deserves).

My first NBA memory was AI’s 76ers in the finals. Absolutely incredible.

by fanfaraway on Dec 3, 2009 4:32 PM PST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

The ultimate coverage and analysis of the Portland Trail Blazers.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
The Blazers Future Regarding Free Agent Signings
Small
Thunderous Manboobies
Img_0878_1__small
Why do we hate LaMarcus Aldridge?
Small
Oregonlive "journalists" 2 new posts...same old drivel
2474796688_7cdc78828f_o_small
Greg Oden Suffers Life-Ending Injury; Gets 3-Year Extension

Recent FanPosts

Small
WHAT TO DO WITH NIC BATUM BECAUSE WE WILL LOSE HIM IF NOT TRADED.
Small
Trade that helps us out now and the future
Small
How can the All-Star game be more fun and competitive?
Small
Earl Boykins!
Small
LaMarcus Aldridge about to become the 10th highest scorer in Blazers franchise  history
Small
New trade that gets us a new point and a three point shooter
Small
Portland getting.....
Small
The Sun Behind the Clouds: Blazers still on track.
Blazers_small
What are we missing?

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

FanShots

Quick hits of video, photos, quotes, chats, links and lists that you find around the web.

Recommended FanShots

Double rainbow of sadness:

1) JBay is getting shorter
2) We never got to see him with a mustache

I miss you tiny raptor man.

via The Basketball Jones http://blogs.thescore.com/tbj/2012/02/09/things-of-note-for-february-9-2012/#more-34561
Blazers Broadcasters Mike Barrett and Mike Rice re-enacted NBA referee Scott Foster's controversial goaltending call on Portland Trail Blazers forward LaMarcus Aldridge, who was defending Oklahoma City Thunder All-Star forward Kevin Durant, during this week's edition of Blazers Courtside. Remarkably, no one was injured during the taping of this segment.

Original video of the play here. 
Quotes from the players and coaches here. 
The NBA admitting it got the call wrong here. 
Dave's  extended thoughts here. 
BlazersMakr's FanShot: Major Vegas action on OKC prior to tip here. 
Audio of Chad Doing of 750 AM The Game going HAM on Foster here.

OK, that should just about wrap up the goaltending discussion.

Courtside video via Blazers Broadcasting cameraman John Curry.

-- Ben Golliver | benjamin.golliver@gmail.com | Twitter
In 2008 Tim Donaghy indicated that Scott Foster was a ref that also fixed games
Blazers Owner Paul Allen Ranked No. 3 American Philanthropist In 2011
Rhino

Recent FanShots

LaMarcus Aldridge Needs Support Around Him
LaMarcus Aldridge Finds Out He's An All-Star With His Teammates
Congratulations to Portland Trail Blazers forward LaMarcus Aldridge, on his first All Star selection.

As seen on www.trailblazers.com
AWoj: Aldridge an All Star
It's pretty clear that the season is over already ;)
CRAZY stat from Houston game
NBA MVP Rankings... LMA @ #10
Celtics interested in Rondo - Gasol swap? ...
Batum - Top 10 NBA Sixth Men

+ New FanShot All FanShots >


Editors

Kitten_small Dave

Headshotsmall_small Ben Golliver

Lead Moderators

Getfuzzy-satchel_small Timmay!

Bucky3_small Cablinasian

Authors

Plainlc_small Storyteller

Moderators

Lamb_small T Darkstar

Small douglast

Terryporter_small prezofdeath

Small usmcr3049

Lrg_magpie_small Corvid

Wallpaper_small geoffm