Jorge Sierra: Blazers To Add Anthony Tolliver
by Ben. on Dec 17, 2009 9:05 AM PST
in News
80 comments
Jorge Sierra of HoopsHype.com with the scoop: there will be no delay from the Blazers in using their recently-granted hardship exception.
The Trail Blazers... will give a contract today to Anthony Tolliver, sources told HoopsHype.com. Tolliver, a 6-foot-9 forward with good shooting skills, played with the San Antonio Spurs for two months last season and also had a 10-day stint with the New Orleans Hornets. He was currently playing in the NBDL with the Idaho Stampede, where he was averaging 20.7 ppg and 9.9 rebounds and shooting 43 percent from three-point land.
Tolliver is expected to be in uniform Thursday night against Phoenix.
On December 14, just three days ago, Scott Schroeder of Ridiculous Upside wrote...
Anthony Tolliver has got to be the next person to get a call-up (Note: If the NBA keeps going the Jonathan Bender route, replace AT with Chocolate Thunder Darryl Dawkins). The 6'9" Tolliver continued to be a sniper, hitting 6-of-10 from beyond the arc to finish with 28 points on the day. He picked up seven boards as well, but that was kind of negated by his five turnovers (which are more a result of the Idaho offense than anything). He can play inside and outside on offense, does the little things on defense and generally seems to care - which isn't, unfortunately, a given in the D-League.
Good call, Scott. Ridiculous Upside also put up a call-up rankings list yesterday, which you can find here. Scott was nice enough to email over a full breakdown of Tolliver's game.
Tolliver's biggest knock seem to be no true position, stemming from Summer League last year. He prefers to play in the post, but San Antonio tried him out in what I'm calling a Matt Bonner role, AT got hot from 3-point land (not typically his specialty) and earned himself a few weeks in San Antonio in that role. Once his 3-point shot wasn't falling consistently, however, they let him go.
He's not a guy that can get the ball in the post and dominate, but he has enough low post game to be able to score with his back to the basket... in Idaho, they run a SSOL offense, which suits his game perfectly... He's too versatile to just sit him in the post and let him go to work with his back to the basket all game.
He's not strong enough to guard Dwight Howard, but he'll be able to hold his own down low. As far as the meshing goes, nobody really meshes in the D-League, simply because everyone is trying to get to the NBA, but I've never heard any issues as far as Tolliver being a problem in that regard.
He's active, athletic and only 24 years old. He's not going to set the world on fire, but he's willing do the little things, and do them well.
In a great scouting report, Brother Wendell Maxey breaks down Tolliver's travels in detail and lays out this quote from Tolliver's D-League coach...
"In my estimation he's (Tolliver) one of the top five players in the league," MacKinnon said back then. "He has a chance to be one of the first call-ups to the NBA."
Maxey also unearthed this post from the new D-League Digest blog, which has some more information on Tolliver from Steve Weinman.
There are plenty of guys on the basketball circuit who can fill up a stat sheet, and Anthony Tolliver did his share of box score-stuffing on Wednesday night: 20 points, 17 rebounds (7 offensive), 4 assists, 2 steals, 2 blocks and 6 turnovers. But to borrow the type of term Walt Frazier enjoys using, I can remember few other occasions when a player seemed as omnipresent as AT did on Wednesday.
Here's Tolliver's Draft Express page. The last entry, from the 2008 Las Vegas Summer League, reads...
He has been consistently impressive, doing a lot of shooting and a little bit of everything else. He is a good rebounder, a sound defender, extremely intelligent, and just a highly versatile all-around player. Don't be surprised to see him making a team this summer...
Tolliver worked out for the Blazers prior to the 2007 NBA draft.
He's one of those guys that I feel like has issues with meshing. And I'm not sold on his strength
Passes out of the double team well. Granted its the D-League but he has decent touch. He seems to play solid D. Guy loves to go into the paint once he catches with back to basket, I haven't seen him turn baseline once... from either side. Doesn't seem to attack the rim though, lots of shots coming across the lane. 3 pt stroke looks pretty solid, his release is a little low. Solid from top of key and the corner.
Tolliver is at Blazers' shootaround. Will be signed later today, source says.
PS Thanks to grigs in the Fanshots.
0 recs |
80 comments
|
Email
Print
Comments
Welcome to the Blazers!
This will be a good thing to be pleasantly distracted by while we struggle through these injuries …
by kickbrass on Dec 17, 2009 9:14 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
Injuries? What injuries? LA-LA-LA-LA-LA-LA-LA I’m not hearing this!
Columbus til I die, Columbus til I die. I know I am, I swear I am, Columbus til I die!
FKA BLAZER_FAN_199. Now an author for THE Jackets Cannon!
by Andrew Tolliver on Dec 17, 2009 9:31 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Anthony is that you in disguise?
"I don't always read blogs regarding the Trail Blazers
...but when I do... I read Blazers Edge."
- resurrect_ha28
by FiveOhThree-RipCity!! on Dec 17, 2009 10:13 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Definitely not. I’m nowhere near 6’9
Columbus til I die, Columbus til I die. I know I am, I swear I am, Columbus til I die!
FKA BLAZER_FAN_199. Now an author for THE Jackets Cannon!
by Andrew Tolliver on Dec 17, 2009 10:38 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Sounds good, look forward to hearing more.
Is he exclusively a 4? Or is he a 3-4 Tweener ala Trout.
by upper left corner on Dec 17, 2009 9:24 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
I think he's actually a 4/5 guy
He’s listed as center on ESPN’s profile page. I get the impression that he’s more of a Chuck Hayes’ type 4/5. Not super tall, but big enough to hold his ground playing the 5.
www.ripcitydispatch.com
by Blazer Guy on Dec 17, 2009 9:26 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Answered my own question Draft Express has him as a 4-5
Given that he measured only 6’7" w/o shoes, he is pretty short for a five. Maybe he can be our Chuck Hayes.
by upper left corner on Dec 17, 2009 9:28 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
based on his '07 draft profile
he struggles guarding the perimeter, like Cunningham
now Dante and Pendergraph have some competition for those backup PF minutes
I liked reading the reports re: how AT hustles for loose balls, Nate likes scrappy players
When reached 40 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!
by two4larue on Dec 17, 2009 12:02 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
ACTUALLY
if pendergraph comes back, then tolliver is gone
by comptoncory on Dec 17, 2009 7:21 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Ben
Yours and his name rhyme, but his and mine are the same. What now?!
Columbus til I die, Columbus til I die. I know I am, I swear I am, Columbus til I die!
FKA BLAZER_FAN_199. Now an author for THE Jackets Cannon!
by Andrew Tolliver on Dec 17, 2009 9:31 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
Same first initial, Ben
And “A” comes before “B”. On my scorecard, he’s already won two rounds, you’d better up your game.
#52
by jscot on Dec 17, 2009 10:08 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Score!
A.T. – 2
Ben – 1
Columbus til I die, Columbus til I die. I know I am, I swear I am, Columbus til I die!
FKA BLAZER_FAN_199. Now an author for THE Jackets Cannon!
by Andrew Tolliver on Dec 17, 2009 10:39 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Hey, Ben, just a word
I appreciate how you consistently give a shout out to the guys who got things posted in fanshots. You don’t have to do it, because we all know you’d get the info very quickly anyway. But it speaks well of you that you always give credit.
I’ll write something snarky about you tomorrow to make up for this….
#52
by jscot on Dec 17, 2009 12:17 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Good, a big who can (hopefully) defend other perimeter bigs.
"Sometimes that light at the end of the tunnel is a train."
-- Charles Barkley
by halo_on on Dec 17, 2009 9:31 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
what if he's the next Ben Wallace?
that would be nice.
"One of the bright spots of the young season has been rookie point guard Jonny Flynn, whose name sounds like he should be the lead character in a Broadway Musical. "What are you doing here, Jonny Flynn?" "Why I'm here to court trouble, and woo a girl, and build the most fantastical contraption the world has ever seen!" -- Dave, Game 7 Blazers versus Timberwolves preview
by BlazersOrBust on Dec 17, 2009 9:37 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
Next Ben Wallace?
I’m pretty sure Ben never shot over 40% from beyond the arc…
by jigglyai on Dec 17, 2009 9:41 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I am sure he got close
wait!! You are not talking about the restricted circle, are you.
" Welcome to the Bedge....where good, is never good enough"…Rudiculous
by 92wastheyear on Dec 17, 2009 10:00 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Next Ben Wallace
= guy who was signed as an undrafted free agent and became a force in the league.
"One of the bright spots of the young season has been rookie point guard Jonny Flynn, whose name sounds like he should be the lead character in a Broadway Musical. "What are you doing here, Jonny Flynn?" "Why I'm here to court trouble, and woo a girl, and build the most fantastical contraption the world has ever seen!" -- Dave, Game 7 Blazers versus Timberwolves preview
by BlazersOrBust on Dec 19, 2009 11:28 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
KP just loves shooters....
Welcome aboard! Seems likely there’s going to be a chance to fight for that 15th roster spot, with all that’s happened….
#52
by jscot on Dec 17, 2009 9:45 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
If I understand correctly
it’s when one of the four last injured players returns (Nic, Travis, Rudy, Greg). Most likely Rudy.
Which means he gets probably 4-8 weeks. Mills and Pendergraph should be back by that time, which means they’ll actually get to show what they can do on the court before the decision has to be made. With Bayless’ progress and our injuries at the big positions, I suspect Mills is in danger, but obviously, if one of the big men struggles, there won’t be much reason to keep him around.
The other possibility is a 2 for 1 trade, or a player for a pick trade, clearing a roster spot.
#52
by jscot on Dec 17, 2009 10:07 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
If room is made for Tolliver past Rudy's return
I’d put high odds that it is due to an unbalanced trade. Hard to imagine them waiving a guy they picked (Mills), for a D-league callup who they can likely bring back next summer even if they like him.
How did you guys win that?
"We scored enough points. We scored 107, they scored 105.
-Nate McMillan Postgame, 3/4/2009
by douglast on Dec 17, 2009 10:20 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
He’s a fringe NBA player, having made the roster of the Cavs (after going undrafted) and Spurs before. His role right now is as another body for practice and to help out with the rotation in case of foul trouble. For him it’s a good chance to either make this team, or at least recommend himself to all others. And it pays better than a year in the D-League. Win win.
Miller - Roy - Webster - Aldridge - Przybilla. Is that so hard?
by Norsktroll on Dec 17, 2009 10:37 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Add a 10 day contract with the Hornets to his NBA experience.
Miller - Roy - Webster - Aldridge - Przybilla. Is that so hard?
by Norsktroll on Dec 17, 2009 10:38 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
absolutely agreed
it just seems highly doubtful they would waive Mills to keep Tolliver, given that they’ve kept him thus far. Seems more likely to me that a guy like Pendergraph could be cut loose if Tolliver shows anything to the team.
How did you guys win that?
"We scored enough points. We scored 107, they scored 105.
-Nate McMillan Postgame, 3/4/2009
by douglast on Dec 17, 2009 10:51 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
hopefully this means
that Juwan Howard will go back to his “assistant coaching” role
When reached 40 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!
by two4larue on Dec 17, 2009 11:24 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Unlikely
Pendergraph’s deal is fully guaranteed whereas Mills’ is not. I’d expect trades before people get cut loose for nothing.
by nikolokolus on Dec 17, 2009 11:27 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
yep
i highly doubt anyone would get cut to sign Tolliver.
How did you guys win that?
"We scored enough points. We scored 107, they scored 105.
-Nate McMillan Postgame, 3/4/2009
by douglast on Dec 17, 2009 11:37 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Factors you are ignoring
1. We are desperate for bigs right now. Is Mills’ future upside enough to justify costing us a playoff spot this year? Seems doubtful, and if Tolliver shows he can be an effective backup for us, especially at center, I could see us keeping him.
2. Bayless’ emergence potentially decreases the value of Mills’ future upside.
3. Mills will have a chance to play before the decision has to be made. How he performs will factor into this. If Tolliver plays well and Mills doesn’t, the Mills experiment may be over.
4. They may be high on Mills’ potential, but the fact is, they didn’t cut loose Collins and Udoka as soon as Mills signed his contract, so it isn’t as if they are so high on him that the decision was made immediately. They still gave consideration to keeping those other guys, so (despite the fact that some think it was Paul Allen’s decision) Mills’ spot is not sacrosanct.
5. KP isn’t going to make a trade of rotation players to avoid cutting Mills.
#52
by jscot on Dec 17, 2009 12:31 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
not ignoring them.
just weigthing them accordingly. I don’t think it’s impossible Mills could be made to make room for Tolliver, I just think it is highly unlikely.
How did you guys win that?
"We scored enough points. We scored 107, they scored 105.
-Nate McMillan Postgame, 3/4/2009
by douglast on Dec 17, 2009 2:43 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I felt strongly that KP should "cut" Patty
after the injuries began piling up, but as time has gone by I realize it doesn’t really matter. Expectations have been lowered, and even though Mills is the polar-opposite of a player that I think can become a contributer in a playoff-caliber backcourt I suspect KP is going to give him some time to “sink or swim” out on the hardcourt before making a decision on PM’s fate.
The other (maudlin) reason that Mills may be “safe” is that Mr. Allen (allegedly) wanted him on the roster this fall, and it would be brutal for KP to dump Mills now when he’s so close to a return while Paul is undergoing chemo. The Blazers are an organization with a heart, after all…
When reached 40 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!
by two4larue on Dec 17, 2009 3:44 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I doubt Mills would be cut
unless he is back on the court, and not being particularly effective.
#52
by jscot on Dec 18, 2009 4:25 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I suspect Mills is in danger
Depends if KP decides to deal ’Dre or Blake before the deadline
When reached 40 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!
by two4larue on Dec 17, 2009 11:22 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
And who he deals for
You’re right, in that if a small for big trade is made, it changes the dynamic.
#52
by jscot on Dec 17, 2009 12:33 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Good work Ben
I like a guy that turns it over from time to time, to rattle Nate a little bit if nothing else.
Blazer Fan
by leeroyjenkins on Dec 17, 2009 10:02 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
Sweet!
Another soft, jump shooting big-man! If anyone is curious, his NBA rebound rate is even lower than Aldridge’s.
by ilserpente on Dec 17, 2009 10:11 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
Well I guess they got their Trav replacement
Sounds like a stretch four who will give drivers like Miller, Roy and Bayless more room to operate. Who knows what he can bring to the table, but I’m guessing it couldn’t be much worse than what we currently have coming off the bench.
If he can even come close to duplicating his D-league shooting percentages I’ll call it a success.
by nikolokolus on Dec 17, 2009 10:23 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
On second thought.
He’s going to be a practice player for a month or so, forget what I said.
by nikolokolus on Dec 17, 2009 11:28 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
ridiculous
at least when i watch a blazers game i will have a favorite team every night. who ever they are playing…
by comptoncory on Dec 17, 2009 10:38 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
backup 4 or 5?
i wonder if he will play backup 5? seems small for that, but i guess there arent too many options right now. its where the blazers are thinnest right now. i guess he could be another 4 with dante and howard could be backup 5.
"When the Blazers lose, Wheels goes home and beats his cat"- Wild Rice
by teambrandon on Dec 17, 2009 10:57 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
He's a forward. He's 6'9" in shoes if you are generous (6' 8.5" in pre-draft camp 2007).
Miller - Roy - Webster - Aldridge - Przybilla. Is that so hard?
by Norsktroll on Dec 17, 2009 11:02 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
backup center
Why didn’t we sign an actual center, this guy replicates what we already have. as soon as the Pryz leaves a game teams attack the rim and kill us. bad signing, we should have used this exception on someone that could protect the rim.
by JP6 on Dec 17, 2009 11:00 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
There you go again;
using logic like it matters…
Maybe its the Rope-a-Dope strategy for basketball;
they’ll get so tired from dunking that the Blazers will pound them in the 4th.
by Sashland on Dec 17, 2009 11:05 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
deals are still possible
like for Turiaf, etc. This acquisition gives KP a little more depth to deal from, if he’s so inclined
When reached 40 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!
by two4larue on Dec 17, 2009 11:28 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Agreed.
The Blazers clearly needed to sign a center — at least 7’2" and 275 lbs — who can clean the boards at both ends of the floor, play solid individual and help defense, and force opposing defenders to guard him because of his ability to easily score in the paint or find the open man when double-teamed.
#52
by CatMan2 on Dec 17, 2009 12:00 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
There are so many of those in the D-League it's not even funny!
Miller - Roy - Webster - Aldridge - Przybilla. Is that so hard?
by Norsktroll on Dec 17, 2009 12:04 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Look elsewhere, internationally;
from what I saw it seems like Ramos could have fit the bill for 7-10 minutes a game.
With only one real center the Blazers are still at risk.
by Sashland on Dec 17, 2009 5:36 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
wow mature sarcasm
did you even read my post, i never mentioned any of the things you wrote. they need a shotblocker to prevent the opposition from driving. since our guards are so inept at defending anyone with two legs we need to protect the rim. everything you are asking for would be a bonus.
by JP6 on Dec 17, 2009 2:16 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Sorry, don't mind me.
I just roam around Blazersedge spewing sarcasm and irreverence. I did read your post, but the idea of them signing a center who was good enough to be of much use struck me as implausible. As is my custom, I wildly exaggerated in my comment. Please believe me when I say I meant no disrespect.
#52
by CatMan2 on Dec 17, 2009 5:14 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Tolliver is Matt Bonner-esque
He’s a hybrid 4, but I don’t think he’s going to be able to play the 5. Suffice it to say, if he’s not playing the 5 in the D-League, I doubt the Blazers would use him there.
While I disagree with Moore’s assessment that he isn’t strong enough, he just isn’t big enough to defend most NBA centers. Athletic? Yes, but you can’t teach size.
by Scott Schroeder on Dec 17, 2009 11:02 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
So
Is he going to be suited up for tonights game?
by Oden_Favre_28 on Dec 17, 2009 11:03 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
NVM
didn’t really read just glanced over it. Saw it now.
by Oden_Favre_28 on Dec 17, 2009 11:05 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Nate and KP must be desperate for 3pt shooting
After leading the league in 3pt% for much of last year, they have slumped to 14th in the league this year (35%). On top of this, two of their best distance shooters from last year (Outlaw, Rudy) are out for an extended amount of time this year. Portland relies on good 3pt shooting and good rebounding in their attack. This potentially addresses one of those needs. We’re still going to be getting killed in the paint and on the boards as soon as Joel leaves the game, though.
by ilserpente on Dec 17, 2009 11:09 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
Yes
We have an answer to the Suns…now obviously he won’t play much this game because he doesn’t know the plays…but he’s our Channing…a center who can go out for the 3 and jumpshot
by roydendremarcus on Dec 17, 2009 11:10 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
if he DOES play tonight
we’ll be harder to scout
14736251
by appel82 on Dec 17, 2009 11:11 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
Good point
The Warriors did that to the Blazers earlier this season.
I know less than half of you half as well as I should like, and I like less than half of you half as well as you deserve.
by haildablazer on Dec 17, 2009 11:25 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
He seems to play solid D. Guy loves to go into the paint once he catches with back to basket, I haven’t seen him turn baseline once… from either side. Doesn’t seem to attack the rim though, lots of shots coming across the lane
Sounds like a poor man’s LMA
When reached 40 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!
by two4larue on Dec 17, 2009 11:14 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
Similar to LMA but different
So what I watched, and granted it was a small sample size. He generally had more of a post game than LMA, not nearly the midrange game, but a pretty nice looking three point stroke. Seemed especially fond of the corner 3 and the straight on 3.
On further review, when posting from the left block, he turned left shoulder into the paint 80% of the time. and right shoulder from the Rt block 67% of the time. I never really saw him attack the rim, a couple times he linked moves and went rt hand from the rt block, and often went across the lane for a rt hand floating hook from the left block.
by InvisibleNinja on Dec 17, 2009 11:23 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
don't you think
that if there was an available 7ft+ center, that didn’t foul and knew how to block shots and play defensive, another team would have picked him up by now? the d-league is full of half-nots of the nba. this guy was the best PF/C available. that means what you see is better then pretty much everyone else in the d-league. did you want us to pick up a 7+ft center that didnt know how to play at all?
by jeremyse on Dec 17, 2009 11:20 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
Sounds like a good deal
LMA is kinda banged up with the ankle and I dunno if his knee is still sore. Anyways a guy that can fill in at the 4 and 5 while the guys get a break sounds good to me.
On game day, I leave the turkey alone because it is some chemicals in that thing. Nate Mcmillian 11/26/09
by slim503 on Dec 17, 2009 11:20 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
another update posted with a full breakdown of his game from scott schroeder. really good information. refresh the post.
by Ben. on Dec 17, 2009 11:27 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
He likes to lord his luscious mane over them.
I should not sarcastically mock someone I don’t completely agree with.
by pxilpooshr on Dec 17, 2009 11:56 AM PST up reply actions 1 recs
Hope Tolliver can play minutes at the 5
Because, with Pendergraph coming back, we’ll actually have 4 PFs (other than Tolliver) on the active roster (LMA, Howard, Dante, Penders). Maybe the idea is to pair Tolliver up with LMA and let LMA play the 5 for stretches.
www.ripcitydispatch.com
by Blazer Guy on Dec 17, 2009 12:11 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Brian T Smith reports that the two other candidates the Blazers worked out were Chris Richard (PF) and Courtney Sims (C/PF)
Miller - Roy - Webster - Aldridge - Przybilla. Is that so hard?
by Norsktroll on Dec 17, 2009 12:16 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Hm...Chris Richard would have been interesting
Certainly strong enough to play some backup 5 and active on the boards.
52 + 88 = 140% better team.
by xedubx on Dec 17, 2009 12:44 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
so, they were looking for bigs
which makes sense, but the “other” goal remains to add a perimeter defender
When reached 40 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!
by two4larue on Dec 17, 2009 2:09 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Good luck Mr. Tolliver
Welcome to the team
Start Miller.
by RenoBlazerFan on Dec 17, 2009 1:31 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
One more person....
that needs to watch out for falling pianos around this team.
by jenstcy on Dec 17, 2009 3:18 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Blazers announce via text message that they have officially signed Tolliver.
Any $ terms? Was the 2009 Capspace reduced?
Do we know if there are any limitation re: KP including Tolliver in deals before the deadline?
When reached 40 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!
by two4larue on Dec 17, 2009 4:36 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
According to the realgm tradechecker
Tolliver cannot be traded until March 17th.
Players with Trade Restrictions
Anthony Tolliver from Portland
Tolliver was recently signed a contract and as a result he cannot be traded until Mar 17, 2010.
So if AT plays well, he stays in PDX for the remainder of the season
When reached 40 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!
by two4larue on Dec 17, 2009 6:40 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Comments For This Post Are Closed
Secondary Sidebar
FanPosts
Community blog posts and discussion.
Recommended FanPosts
Recent FanPosts
FanShots
Quick hits of video, photos, quotes, chats, links and lists that you find around the web.
Recommended FanShots
Certain photos copyright © 2010 by Associated Press or Getty Images. Any commercial use or distribution without the express written consent of Associated Press and Getty Images is strictly prohibited.
