Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Tiger Woods Makes His 2012 PGA Tour Debut

Game 26 Recap: Blazers 95, Kings 88

A win!  And a fairly nicely fought one too!  Good news for the Blazers right now.  The bad news is that it feels so good to win at home against the Kings, but what they hey.  Beggars can't be choosers.  And it was a nice win.

The game started out with a really nice offensive run keyed by Brandon Roy.  Portland was setting screens on everything--two, three in every set--and players were running off of them on and off the ball.  Roy looked sharp every time he came off of a pick, which confounded the Sacramento defense.  With at least half an eye on him the Kings let Joel Przybilla and Martell Webster slip.  Often that's a good bet but Joel slipped through for a couple of dunks and Martell hit a three and assisted on another to Brandon.  Smackety-smackety and the Kings are down 9 before the halfway mark of the first quarter passed by.  It was a textbook example of what the Portland offense looks like when it's running right.  Everybody moved, everybody was ready to score, nobody held the ball, the team was almost unselfish to a fault, a high percentage of shots went in which made Sacramento stick close to their men which spaced the floor for penetration which in turn set up even more open jumpers.  It was fluid, flexible, and fun.

The Kings, meanwhile, ran their offense through Andres Nocioni and Donte Green.  They're nice enough players, but that has to be considered a victory for the Portland defense which was also working pretty hard, especially in the middle. 

Then, as has been the story frequently this year, Portland got a little comfortable with the lead.  They started shooting jumpers first, thinking of other plans later.  Predictably misses ensued.  When Joel Przybilla went to the bench for a rest the defense also lost its anchor.  Beno Udrih and Ime Udoka connected on a couple shots each and the lead evaporated leaving the teams knotted at 23 after one.

The second period continued the way the first had ended.  Portland got 4 free throws and a layup in the quarter but every other score was a jump shot.  Meanwhile Przybilla started the period on the bench then came in and collected two quick fouls and had to sit again.  The Kings' second unit began attacking from everywhere.  They penetrated, pushed, stroked shots, shared the ball.  The Blazers weren't rotating crisply or getting back in numbers.  All of a sudden they're staring down the wrong end of a 31-20 period and the crowd is moaning.

Let's talk about those rotations for a minute.  People wonder sometimes why this is so hard to get.  A guy needs help, another guy goes to help him, a third guy is supposed to pick up for that second guy, and so on.  But that third-guy position is darn tricky.  Sometimes you have to pick up the open man immediately.  Sometimes you have to shade over and watch how the play develops.  Sometimes leaving your own man at all is more dangerous than helping and it's really more someone else's responsibility to cover.  It's really easy to make the wrong decision.  Sometimes if the opposing team is good enough there is no definitive right answer except for the original guy not getting beat in the first place.  Any way you go, though, it requires that you keep watching your man while also being aware of what is happening in at least two other places on the court, processing all of that information quickly and acting.

On occasion we've watched the Discovery Channel series Deadliest Catch at home.  It's the one about the crab fishermen in Alaska...a documentary/reality series following life on the crab boats during the winter season.  The most interesting part of the show for the producers, and often for the audience, is the struggles of the greenhorns on the deck.  The camera never gives them a break, catching every slip-up, chew-out, and frustrated moment.  In the process a couple things become clear.  The greenhorns aren't bad guys, nor even substandard workers most times.  Their great limitation is that they are only able to do one task at a time because they only see the job in front of them and not how it relates to the whole.  An experienced deckhand does his own job but is also able to see what else needs to be done and efficiently slide over to pitch in and keep the whole show running smoothly.  That's why the old salts are infinitely more valuable even if they and the rookies do a single task at roughly the same level of competence.  The second thing that's clear is that it takes multiple seasons for a greenhorn to develop that kind of vision and confidence.  Learning six individual tasks is one thing.  Learning how they all fit together and timing the need and your participation in each is quite another.  Apparently it takes years to become a full-share deckhand on those boats.

That's fairly similar to what's going on with the Blazers defense most nights, particularly when you have weaker defenders at the point of attack and less experienced guys (which in some ways still includes most of the roster when you figure the primary focus of many of them has been offense) in the help positions.  You usually get one good rotation from Portland.  You don't always get two.  And you don't always get people recovering to the correct place at the right time.  It feels like the enemy just has to show a strong thrust to our front ranks to make us react and then they have our flank exposed.  They sure seemed to in that second period.

Back to the game...

The third quarter saw a couple of significant developments.  First, Joel Przybilla remained in the game.  Second, the Blazers fed the offense through LaMarcus Aldridge.  LaMarcus ate the Kings' lunch for the first half of the period, scoring 10 of the 15 the Blazers put up before the 6:00 mark.  Once again the bold attack opened up opportunities on the perimeter which Martell Webster and Brandon Roy happily took advantage of.  The Kings, meanwhile, reverted to their Nocioni-Greene offense.  The Blazers encouraged this by steadfastly refusing to let them run.  Bingo-Bango-Boinko, the lead is erased and we have a ballgame.

And from the time the score got close around the midway point of the third it really was a good game.  The Kings suddenly remembered that they had Tyreke Evans on their side and that we weren't very good at containing penetration.  The Blazers started hustling both ways, scrapping for loose balls, and putting up decent shots.  The Kings drew first blood at the end of the third when Evans put the Blazers back on their heels.  Portland came back by repeating their first-quarter screen-pass offense with some penetration by Brandon Roy thrown in.  Evans kept fighting and corralled the heretofore-quiet Jason Thompson into the fight.  Portland responded with Aldridge and Roy, then Jerryd Bayless started driving and drawing fouls, exposing the Kings' weakness on defense they way they had exposed ours.  In the end three beat two.  Sacramento couldn't keep up on the foul line and they never strung together enough shots to make the difference.  95-88, Blazers win.  Energy, unselfishness, and a little know-how about breaking down a sub-standard defense carried the day.

Click through for Individual Observations, Jersey Contest links, and other notes.

Star-divide

Individual Observations

Brandon Roy wasn't just the main scorer in this game, he was truly the main catalyst.  He gave the Kings fits to the tune of 10-20 shooting and 25 points.  But the bigger stat was his 10 assists.  He used his influence to get his friends involved, particularly the big men early in each half.  That doubled his effectiveness at least.  He had 5 turnovers to go with those assists so it's not like the game was completely polished, but it was a Brandon you'd love to see every night.  Of equal note:  his teammates were ready to make this Brandon look good.  They weren't standing.  They converted the shots he gave them.

LaMarcus Aldridge matched Roy's 25, dominating the second half as we described.  He kept Jason Thompson occupied which helped divert his attention from his strengths.  Thompson had 1 offensive rebound on the night.  Aldridge had 5.  Having to protect the glass against LaMarcus and Joel kept the Kings from getting into their offense as quickly as they'd like.

I loved Joel Przybilla's game tonight.  He led the defense in shutting off penetration, set the tone in taking charges (which the team did frequently tonight), grabbed 10 rebounds, and his 2 dunks off of feeds in the first period made the Kings a little leery instead of taking him for granted.  He didn't force a thing.  He just looked good.

Jerryd Bayless was the star off the bench with 14 points, 8-10 free throws, 3-6 from the field, 2 assists, 2 rebounds, and even a block.  This defense was made for him and he took advantage, making his bones in the fourth quarter when the coaching staff showed confidence in him by leaving him in until the game was done.  He also played some nice defense down the stretch.

Martell Webster had a workman-like game.  He kept the floor wide open by hitting a couple threes and came away with 9 points, 4 rebounds, and 2 assists.  When Martell is getting assists you know the offense is working.

Andre Miller did not have a good night.  He had the usual defensive troubles but he also shot 2-10 from the field for 4 points, 3 rebounds, and 3 assists in 29 minutes.  He wasn't in synch with the offense.  He was actually duplicating Jerryd's secondary-scorer role but he wasn't scoring.

Steve Blake got 24 minutes and blended in, hitting a couple shots (including a three) to keep the defense honest.  5 points, 2 assists, no big mistakes or awkward moments.

Juwan Howard hit all three of his shots for 6 points but he's no Przybilla on defense.  The thing I like best about Juwan, something the other guys could learn from, is that his offense is so compact.  You watch him and when it's time to shoot he doesn't mess around with the ball or the dribble or anything.  He just takes the shot.

Dante Cunningham got 2 points and 2 boards in 6 minutes.

Final Thoughts

24 assists on 36 made shots with only 11 turnovers is going to win you a lot of games.  But the stat of the night was Sacramento with 2--count them...2--fast break points to their credit.  Nice.

Boxscore

Read the reaction at SactownRoyalty.

Here's your Jersey Contest Scoreboard. You can enter the form for the Phoenix game here.

--Dave (blazersub@yahoo.com)

Comment 58 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Rudy

 Outlaw and Pryz are so important to this team. Gotta find a way to hang on to them in the future.

by BBG on Dec 16, 2009 12:09 AM PST reply actions  

Andre didn't look great, but there WAS better ball movement

We let Blake start 25 games, and he has three years with Brandon under his belt. Let’s at least give Dre sometime to “mesh” as a starter.

by Dobbler on Dec 16, 2009 12:11 AM PST reply actions  

I will say that I think Andre

did help with that…but man…

#52. Get well soon.

by Eat Politicians on Dec 16, 2009 12:28 AM PST up reply actions  

I agree

Andre starts, and the first half of the first and third quarters we looked like a team.

Andre has been up and down with his shooting/scoring all year, and this was definitely in the “down” category, but I can’t fault the way the offense looked with the starters at the start of each half.

#52

by jscot on Dec 16, 2009 6:47 AM PST up reply actions  

Much better interior passing

I loved the play where Dre dropped a bounce pass down to LMA and Aldridge shoveled it to Przy for the dunk. These are “risky” entry passes you won’t get from Blake

But even better was the pick and slip that Roy/LMA ran late that resulted in the game-deciding 3-point play. I’d like to think that adding Miller has improved the BBIQ of Roy/LMA to make these kinds of plays possible. Mayyybe Brandon would’ve “figured out” how to feed the bigs like that on his own, without Andre being onboard…but we weren’t seeing that kind of play last year. Ever.

When reached 40 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!

by two4larue on Dec 16, 2009 12:18 PM PST up reply actions  

that play was great

and it is an example of a play that was completely and absolutely created by Miller, even though he got no assist out of it. No other PG on the roster could have or would have made that initial pass into LMA. There were at least twoother plays in the game where MIller pushing the one-man fast break turned into easy layins for the team, even though neither one was an assist.

How did you guys win that?
"We scored enough points. We scored 107, they scored 105.
-Nate McMillan Postgame, 3/4/2009

by douglast on Dec 16, 2009 12:45 PM PST up reply actions  

Miller pushing it and missing led to Martell's dunk

It was an obvious case where missing a shot isn’t necessarily bad, because you’ve got the advantage on the rebound.

#52

by jscot on Dec 16, 2009 1:30 PM PST up reply actions  

yep, that was one of the plays I was thinking of.

How did you guys win that?
"We scored enough points. We scored 107, they scored 105.
-Nate McMillan Postgame, 3/4/2009

by douglast on Dec 16, 2009 2:40 PM PST up reply actions  

much as I thought

glad to see the offense moving again…so Nate either corrected his approach or correct his players. Either way, it was what I was hoping to see (most the night anyway).

Still, a top tier team would have torn us to shreds tonight. 9 players still finding their way, what are you going to do?

Is Miller’s confidence gone?

#52. Get well soon.

by Eat Politicians on Dec 16, 2009 12:28 AM PST reply actions  

Doubtful

Highly so.

He is a hot and cold shooter, we all know that.

"Good evening Blazer fans, wherever you may be!"-Bill Schonely

by skywaker9 on Dec 16, 2009 12:29 AM PST up reply actions  

Bayless at his best

Reminds me of Tony Parker. Not a natural passer but a slasher extraordinare..

"Good evening Blazer fans, wherever you may be!"-Bill Schonely

by skywaker9 on Dec 16, 2009 12:30 AM PST reply actions  

Anyone remember if Parker

 as a rookie is btter than Bayless is now? I know it didn’t take long for Popovich to start Tony, not saying that Bayless should start.

by VinnyB on Dec 16, 2009 12:35 AM PST reply actions  

Tony Parker saw a lot of bench time his first couple of seasons.

Pops was yanking him all the time whenever he made dumb moves or didn’t operate within the offense.

hakkaa päälle !

by timg56 on Dec 16, 2009 6:15 AM PST up reply actions  

21 year old Bayless

has been better than 19 year old Tony Parker, although I don’t think you can really take much out of that.

#52

by Royster on Dec 16, 2009 6:22 AM PST up reply actions  

Beggars can’t be choosers

Thought it read BEdgers can’t be choosers.

Oregon State, Oklahoma State, Ohio State..just another OSU. Free Dennis Dixon!!!

by Matt Daddy on Dec 16, 2009 12:41 AM PST reply actions  

I liked the scrappiness and workmanlike way the team attacked in the 2nd half

Especially liked Joel. Sat in the first half with 2 and then 3 fouls – ended the game with 3 fouls.

It was a start. Now 4 days to get it better.

Andre needs to be a pass-first point guard when Brandon is in the game. Too many shots and especially when he is not hitting them. I don’t think he played in the 4th quarter. Will that now be an issue from him?

"I could almost fall asleep when he's got the ball," Demopoulos said of Roy. "That's how comfortable I feel with him. He always comes through."

by lee3022 on Dec 16, 2009 12:47 AM PST reply actions  

Will that now be an issue from him?

Depends…did the the team win the game? If yes, then no ’Dre issues

When reached 40 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!

by two4larue on Dec 16, 2009 12:20 PM PST up reply actions  

Dave

It’s always sweeter to read your reviews when we win, and win the right way.

I really liked the distribution of point guard minutes tonight. Dre had a bad shooting night (Sometimes I wince when he puts up a J), but that starting lineup looked really nice together. And Bayless got 24 minutes with all we hope for + some good passes and a meaningful bucket at the end of the game (off a very nice Brandon Roy feed).

by Chadillac5000 on Dec 16, 2009 12:57 AM PST reply actions  

Dave you were not hard enough on Miller

He finally got his wish to start and was the only starter with a negative +/-. I could understand if he was playing with Howard, but he wasn’t. His defense isn’t good enough to offset his poor offense.

This might be the most unhappy I’ve ever been after being right.

by tominhawaii on Dec 16, 2009 3:06 AM PST reply actions  

But the team did start the game really well

with Miller. So the +/- thing does not make a lot of sense this time.

by VinnyB on Dec 16, 2009 3:17 AM PST up reply actions  

Yeah, but he didn't really have much to do with the good start.

Roy was the one making plays, getting guys the ball, and Webster happened to be hitting his shots. I really want to see Miller driving to the hoop a whole lot more. That’s what he is good at, and when he is good at getting other guys the ball. If the shot clock is running down, I’d like to see him put it on the floor, not take an ugly jump shot.

by wingzeta on Dec 16, 2009 3:51 AM PST up reply actions  

I loved

how excited Jerryd got when Steve made that three. I think he was happier than anyone in the arena.

by seanovan mcnoob on Dec 16, 2009 4:42 AM PST reply actions  

cuz Jerryd got an assist!

lol jk

Come on you gotta listen unto me,
lay off that whiskey and let that cocaine be. ~Johnny Cash

by HurraKane212 on Dec 16, 2009 5:49 AM PST up reply actions  

As they say, there aren't many "must-win" games in the NBA schedule

And sadly this year, this was a must-win game. They got it, and hopefully it will let the team clear some of the crud out of its system. 9 players could be enough to hold down the fort until Rudy and Nic get back.

by Dodoh on Dec 16, 2009 6:06 AM PST reply actions  

Kind of an odd set of 2nd half substitutions

for Nate tonight, with Andre, Webster and LaMarcus playing the entire 3rd, and Bayless, Blake, Roy, and Joel playing the entire 4th. I can’t say I’m too surprised we got demolished at the end of the 3rd when our only fresh guys on the court were Juwan and Blake.

http://popcornmachine.net/cgi-bin/gameflow.cgi?date=20091215&game=SACPOR

#52

by Royster on Dec 16, 2009 6:07 AM PST reply actions  

Agreed

The substitution pattern looks kind of haphazard. Not sure if Chemistry Professor Nate has a formula, or if he is just grabbing beakers and pouring stuff together looking for a reaction.

by upper left corner on Dec 16, 2009 8:59 AM PST up reply actions  

I"m not Nate defender, but on this regard he can't win...

when he plays his set rotations, he gets criticized for being inflexibly rigid instead of riding a hot hand.
Last night, he let the on-court play dictate the rotations more, and now he’s criticized for that.

Personally, I was impressed with his rotational flexibility last night – he stayed with the starters in the third until the timeout at the 2:32 mark – which was good because they were rolling. Then in the 4th, he rode Bayless down the stretch, which almost assuredly wasn’t his initial plan.

How did you guys win that?
"We scored enough points. We scored 107, they scored 105.
-Nate McMillan Postgame, 3/4/2009

by douglast on Dec 16, 2009 10:49 AM PST up reply actions   1 recs

I don't disagree

When stuff isn’t working, I would rather see flexibility than rigidity.

My only point is that coaches usually make a series of substitutions towards the end of the first and third period. Last night, Nate tended to put one team on the floor for almost the entire first and third, and then ran with a different group in the second and fourth.

Mostly, I was just glad to see Miller starting, Bayless getting minutes with the big boys, and Blake getting his numbers reduced, at least somewhat.

by upper left corner on Dec 16, 2009 11:10 AM PST up reply actions  

Just out of curiousity - do you watch a lot of other NBA games?

The reason I ask is that I don’t have the faintest clue what the substitution patterns are of even a couple of coaches around the league, let alone most.

Is this something you’ve charted or perhaps focus on during the game? If I were to ask, could you describe who Phil Jackson or Greg Poppovich or Larry Brown brings off the bench first and at what point in the game?

I know I’ve never taken the time to study this. Which could explain why I tend to think that coaches substitute and determine rotations for a variety of reasons, one of the biggest being their gut feeling as they watch the action.

hakkaa päälle !

by timg56 on Dec 16, 2009 1:31 PM PST up reply actions  

Nah, I'm a homer.

My wife would divorce me if I watched more basketball than I do. My sports consumption is primarily limited to the Blazers and Duck football, mixed in with a few golf and tennis majors. My wife is a pretty good sport about it, but there are definitely limits to her patience.

I do watch a few games when she isn’t home and I sneak in quite a few games during the playoffs. I would recommend heading over to the popcorn machine (link above in this thread) if you want to see other coaches substitution patterns. It is a very cool site.

by upper left corner on Dec 16, 2009 1:59 PM PST up reply actions  

Well, I understand wanting to adapt the substitutions

but it’s a matter of trading off. We won’t be able to play Roy nearly 44 minutes every night, and he paid for riding his starters so long into the third with Sacramento’s run at the end of the third as I said. I didn’t think I was casting it in a particularly harsh light, just that it’s really not something you almost ever see.

#52

by Royster on Dec 16, 2009 11:14 AM PST up reply actions  

With a KGW game, I assumed it I couldn't watch it up here.

But flipping through the channels I found it about a third of the way into the 2nd quarter.

As the first half ended my thoughts put squarely in the category of a leeroy disciple. What I was seeing was simply a lack of effort and most nights I find that inexcusable.

But Mike Barrett may have been right when he said he thought Nate tossed the buffet platter across the lockerroom at half time, as the guys came out to play. Amazing what putting forth all your effort can get you.

One thing I would like to understand better is why the Blazers often seem to take so long to make decisions. It looks like they have to stop and think – “Ok, how is the deffense set up?” , “Who do I swing the ball to first?” “Where is LaMarcus?” I’d peg that as the biggest culprit in why they shoot so late in the clock.

hakkaa päälle !

by timg56 on Dec 16, 2009 6:25 AM PST reply actions  

Maybe someone can correct me

but it seemed that, listening to the game on the internet, when Blake came in the game in the first half is when the Blazers started standing around. Again, I admit I didn’t see the game, but that was my impression.

I like Blake, but I’m really starting to think that it is time for him to go.

by hercher on Dec 16, 2009 9:13 AM PST reply actions  

I think it is a common mistake on the part of fans ...

… to form opinions based on what they see in a game.

My observation was that Miller was pretty ineffective. He stood around too much and his shot sucked. It seemed that he got a lot less time on court in the 2nd half.

But I’m not about to draw any conclusions from that. First off I missed the entire 1st quarter. From some of the comments here, Miller helped get the team into the offense pretty quickly, with Brandon playing well off the ball. Secondly, I know that guys are going to have bad shooting nights and that is easy to find oneself suddenly “out of the flow”. That appeared to happen to Andre. But that’s also a game to game thing. Sometimes even a quarter to quarter thing. Last night LaMarcus and Roy stepped it up to start off the third quarter, Blake, who I give the edge to as a defender over Andre, hit a couple of open shots and Bayless came in and provided spark and added energy. There really wasn’t a need for Andre under those circumstances and therefore he never got the chance to see if he could “recover the flow” so to speak. Thursday night is a new game and the clock gets reset. Forget how Andre played last night. Tomorrow he may go off for a double – double.

hakkaa päälle !

by timg56 on Dec 16, 2009 10:11 AM PST up reply actions  

Sacramento had something to do with it too

The Kings mixed up their lineup at about the same time that Blake came into the game – late 1st quarter. They brought in Udoka, Udrih and Casspi. That lineup played much better defense. Changing Andre to Steve may have made a difference in how the Blazer offense functioned, but I think that Sacramento’s approach may have been more of a factor.

We sometimes forget that the other team makes adjustments during a game that affect how the Blazers play.

by Woodduck on Dec 16, 2009 10:56 AM PST up reply actions  

Joel = MVP of the game

When he was in, we dominated. When he was out, we didn’t. His +/- was 27 most of which was in the 2nd half.

Even thought Miller’s stats don’t show it, the tried and true ‘eyeball test’ showed the offense moving much smoother at the start of the game and the beginning of the 3rd quarter. The tempo was up and we were more opportunistic on our shot selection instead of waiting until the end of the clock. It made me happy, although I still cringe sometimes when he shoots it but he has got to take it to keep ’em honest.

Roy’s game was pretty much perfect other than I’d like to see him run out more on the fast break. He seemed to be the guy lagging behind when ’Dre was pushing the tempo…but 10 assists from him AND 25 points = forgiven!

Let's do it for the big man!...and Rudy!....and Nic!...and, uh, Trout, Pendy, Patty, Mo, Mr. Allen, and Nate!

Rehab With Us

by clinchmobb on Dec 16, 2009 9:19 AM PST reply actions  

word

Joel was our rock this game

by Chadillac5000 on Dec 16, 2009 1:16 PM PST up reply actions  

Thoughts

We had three very strong stretches of play – the first six minutes of each half, and then pretty much the entire fourth quarter.

In the first half of the first and third quarters, it was clear to me that the offense was moving faster. Not breakneck by any means, but there was a noticeable increase in the tempo. We actually looked to run the break on most turnovers and rebounds (we are still terrible at executing a break, but at least we looked for it). When that failed, we scored a number of easy baskets on the secondary break, before allowing the defense to fully set up. This is what we have seen very little of this season. Addtionally, once we actually got into a half court sets, we seemed to be playing quicker. Both players and the ball were moving around more, and passes were being made quicker. This again led to some easy baskets off of some nifty post entry passes to a moving target and (gasp!) actual cutters to the basket!!!

I"m not sure how much of this obvious change can be attribute to having Miller in the starting lineup, and how much can be attributed to the coaches and players working on and thinking conciously about being less deliberate and more instinctive. It was clear to me that it was some of both.

After the 6 minute mark in the first (coincidentally or not when Miller went out), and for the remainder of the half (even after Miller’s return), we seemed to completely forget this new found strategy and reverted to old, bad habits of standing around, calling too many isolations, and taking far too many jump shots. We did the same thing again for the last 4 minutes or so of the 3rd quarter.

After some early mistakes by Bayless in the first half (likely the result of pushing too hard, rather then letting the game come to him), it was encouraging to see Nate give him the minutes and the leash that he said we would. Bayless played through the early mistakes and was a difference maker in the 4th quarter. I suspect old Nate might not have trusted him down the stretch, instead put Miller back in and reverted to a lot more Roy 1-4 iso. I think we lose had he done that. Having a secondary penetrator/playmaker in the game down the stretch was huge. I noticed even when Blake was in, Bayless was getting the early outlets and running the break attempts. This was clearly by design, and was very smart. Once the halfcourt sets came in, Bayless’ ability to break down a defense after Brandon had already broken them down then dished off, was a key aspect. Blake just can’t do that.

Gotta run to a meeting – some individual thoughts coming after that.

How did you guys win that?
"We scored enough points. We scored 107, they scored 105.
-Nate McMillan Postgame, 3/4/2009

by douglast on Dec 16, 2009 11:00 AM PST reply actions  

Once the halfcourt sets came in, Bayless’ ability to break down a defense after Brandon had already broken them down then dished off

I was expecting Miller to be that “2nd penetrator” when he was acquired, but if Jerryd can fill that role, so much the better for Portland’s future

When reached 40 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!

by two4larue on Dec 16, 2009 1:01 PM PST up reply actions  

Right

But maybe even better for our present, if Jerryd can be a better spot up shooter than Andre.

#52

by jscot on Dec 16, 2009 1:35 PM PST up reply actions  

i think some nights Miller will (and should be) our second penetrator.

Basically, the crunchtime lineup right now is going to be Roy/LMA/Joel. The other two spots are going to be made up of one penetrator (Miller or Bayless) and one shooter (Blake or Webster), depending on a variety of things including matchups and which of Miller/Bayless and Blake/Webster have it going that game.

When Rudy comes back he would hopefully nab the “shooter” role on most night from Blake/Webster, but we would still likely use either Bayless or Miller depending on matchups and hot hand.

How did you guys win that?
"We scored enough points. We scored 107, they scored 105.
-Nate McMillan Postgame, 3/4/2009

by douglast on Dec 16, 2009 2:45 PM PST up reply actions  

it's ironic

but the first time I noticed the need for a “2nd penetrator” was last spring when Miller and his Philly teammates trapped Roy out top and forced Brandon to pass the ball to Blake, Outlaw, etc. The 1-4 offense instantly stagnated and the 76’ers left the RG with a road win, thanks to some late-game heroics from Andre

Of course the need for another “creator” was magnified after the Rocket’s series. I also saw where Brandon said yesterday that they didn’t want Bayless “thinking” too much, but to just attack. (This dovetails with Nate’s on-air comments during summer league.) Jerryd is not currently being developed to run the offense like a true PG, he’s simply defending the other team’s PG and attacking the basket whenever he gets the opportunity

When reached 40 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!

by two4larue on Dec 16, 2009 6:24 PM PST up reply actions  

Nice observation

The hope is that Bayless will get increasingly better and able to do both. That is what we really need is another mult-dimensional scorer on the court with Roy and LMA. We need somebody who is good enough from outside to keep their man honest and good enough off the dribble to make them pay for the late close out. I think Bayless and Rudy have the most potential to be that kind of multi-threat scorers. Bayless is the better driver who needs to get better from long range, and Rudy is the bomber who needs to improve off the dribble and from mid-range.

When we get three multi-threat scorers on the floor at the same time, we become exponentially harder to defend.

by upper left corner on Dec 17, 2009 9:52 AM PST up reply actions  

Quoting Laker color commentator Stu Lantz: "Noice!"
Figuring that just missing the Big One is far superior to biting the Big One, the Suns have jettisoned the Big Distraction and returned to their old lineup, if not precisely their old ways

"A bizarre and extremely rare hybrid Blazer/Laker fan, Timbo has always struggled to contain the Beast Within, like Dr. Jekyll, Bruce Banner, or Ted Kennedy." — Miled Animal

by timbo on Dec 17, 2009 8:42 AM PST reply actions  

Even Noicer

If you had put this in the right thread. :)

#52

by jscot on Dec 17, 2009 10:22 AM PST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

The ultimate coverage and analysis of the Portland Trail Blazers.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Blazers_win_small
Blazers F Luke Babbitt Named to 2012 NBA All-Star Team
Small
Thunderous Manboobies
Img_0878_1__small
Why do we hate LaMarcus Aldridge?
Small
Oregonlive "journalists" 2 new posts...same old drivel
2474796688_7cdc78828f_o_small
Greg Oden Suffers Life-Ending Injury; Gets 3-Year Extension

Recent FanPosts

Small
The Sun Behind the Clouds: Blazers still on track.
Blazers_small
What are we missing?
Red_blazer_logo_small
The Felton Trade, Linsanity, and the PG Position 1 year from now
Small
Effort?
Small
WE NEED JOSE CALDERON ASAP.
Blazers_birdman_is_not_welcome_here_pic_small
Thoughts on Houston & OKC Games
Small
This is a bunch of crap!!!
Small
Fire McMillian?!?!
Small
HoopIdea - ESPN's attempts to improve the NBA

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

FanShots

Quick hits of video, photos, quotes, chats, links and lists that you find around the web.

Recommended FanShots

Blazers Broadcasters Mike Barrett and Mike Rice re-enacted NBA referee Scott Foster's controversial goaltending call on Portland Trail Blazers forward LaMarcus Aldridge, who was defending Oklahoma City Thunder All-Star forward Kevin Durant, during this week's edition of Blazers Courtside. Remarkably, no one was injured during the taping of this segment.

Original video of the play here. 
Quotes from the players and coaches here. 
The NBA admitting it got the call wrong here. 
Dave's  extended thoughts here. 
BlazersMakr's FanShot: Major Vegas action on OKC prior to tip here. 
Audio of Chad Doing of 750 AM The Game going HAM on Foster here.

OK, that should just about wrap up the goaltending discussion.

Courtside video via Blazers Broadcasting cameraman John Curry.

-- Ben Golliver | benjamin.golliver@gmail.com | Twitter
In 2008 Tim Donaghy indicated that Scott Foster was a ref that also fixed games
Blazers Owner Paul Allen Ranked No. 3 American Philanthropist In 2011
Rhino
I'm sure you've all heard the news by now that I'm having a scope on my...

Recent FanShots

Congratulations to Portland Trail Blazers forward LaMarcus Aldridge, on his first All Star selection.

As seen on www.trailblazers.com
AWoj: Aldridge an All Star
It's pretty clear that the season is over already ;)
Double rainbow of sadness:

1) JBay is getting shorter
2) We never got to see him with a mustache

I miss you tiny raptor man.

via The Basketball Jones http://blogs.thescore.com/tbj/2012/02/09/things-of-note-for-february-9-2012/#more-34561
CRAZY stat from Houston game
NBA MVP Rankings... LMA @ #10
Celtics interested in Rondo - Gasol swap? ...
Batum - Top 10 NBA Sixth Men
Outside the Garden after every home game on the SE corner!


Jessie Sponberg and his crew are collecting the Chalupas for several outreach programs here in Portland! They will be outside the Rose Garden on the SE corner by the busses after every game!
Four Haikus About Bonzi Wells

+ New FanShot All FanShots >


Editors

Kitten_small Dave

Headshotsmall_small Ben Golliver

Lead Moderators

Getfuzzy-satchel_small Timmay!

Bucky3_small Cablinasian

Authors

Plainlc_small Storyteller

Moderators

Lamb_small T Darkstar

Small douglast

Terryporter_small prezofdeath

Small usmcr3049

Lrg_magpie_small Corvid

Wallpaper_small geoffm