"The Blunder" and the Sched Ahead for 12/14/09, Week Eight
Gather round, children, and I'll tell you a story. I need to warn you, though, it's a sad story, one in which the bad guys get away with some very bad things.
Long ago, in a land far away, there was a basketball team. Their fans loved them, and neighboring fans hated them, which is as it should be. They won some games, they lost some games. They even won a championship once.
One day, there was a very rich and evil man, who had some very rich and evil friends, and they decided to kidnap this team, and take it away to their home. But as rich and evil people do, they didn't use guns to steal the team, they used lawyers and lots of money and lied about "good faith efforts" and all that stuff. If you don't understand how that works, it's ok. I hope you'll never be rich and evil (we'd settle for rich and good, though, wouldn't we?), so you won't need to know about that stuff.
Anyway, it worked. They stole the team, but in their hurry to get it away from town, they forgot to take the team name with them.
This created a problem for these rich and evil men, though. The team used to be called the Supersonics, which is a kind of jet airplane which goes really, really fast. These men thought it was good that they used to be called the Supersonics, because they made the team go off to their own city really fast. But now, what would they call their new team, the one they had stolen?
They racked their brains for a solution, and one day, they were sitting around the table, and one of them said, "Hey, if a Supersonic is flying away from Seattle really fast on its way to Oklahoma, doesn't it make a loud noise in the sky?" The others said, "That's it! We'll call our team that loud noise in the sky!"
Now, children, you should know that the loud noise in the sky is called a sonic boom. But the rich and evil men apparently didn't know that there was more than one kind of loud noise in the sky -- and they called their team the "Blunder".
This Sched Ahead edition, for the first time, includes a team from OKC, hereafter known as the "Blunder", as a potential playoff contender.
SUMMARY INFO
This weekly schedule analysis is based on four categories of games:
- Home games against sub .500 teams. Cream Puff Home.
- Home games against winning teams (I'm including teams right at .500 in this category). Jawbreaker Home.
- Road games at losing teams. Banana Peel Road.
- Road games at winning teams. Rocky Road.
A general formula for success in the NBA is to win almost all of Cat 1 (Cream Puff Home), a majority of Cat 2 (Jawbreaker Home) and Cat 3 (Banana Peel Road), and win some in Cat 4 (Rocky Road). The contenders may win more than half of their Cat 4 games.
Back to Backs (hereafter BtoB) are also tracked so as to provide further data on schedule difficulty.
CHANGES THIS WEEK
Milwaukee is back up to .500, so their games are recategorized.
COMMENTS ON THE WEEK
Portland (1-3), splitting two Cat 3 Banana Peels (W at IND, L at the Knicks who were on a BtoB) and lost to Cat 4 Rocky Roads, at CLE and MIL (BtoB). Not a good week.
Dallas (3-0) got back on track, with a Cat 2 home win (Phoenix), a Cat 4 Rocky Road at Miami, and a Cat 1 Cream Puff at home against Charlotte (both teams BtoB).
Denver (2-2) was not stellar, winning only one (@Philly) of three Banana Peels, losing at Charlotte (BtoB) and Detroit (Pistons were BtoB), then somewhat rescuing the week by closing it out with a Cat 2 Jawbreaker home win against Phoenix (who was on a BtoB). Not a very good week, but not horrible.
Houston (2-1) was solid, winning a tough Cat 2 at home against Cleveland (Cavs on a BtoB), then getting a Banana Peel Split on the road with a win at Philly and a loss at Toronto.
L.A. (2-1) got two more home wins (Cat 2 Utah, Cat 1 Cream Puff Minnesota) before finally hitting the road, and immediately taking a loss at Utah in a back to back. They are 15-2 at home and 3-2 on the road. L@ker fans like to think they are as good on the road as at home. If so, they'll win their next 12 road games. Don't hold your breath -- though the competition in the next 4 isn't brutal.
N.O. (2-1) showed they know how to blow a good week. They started well, winning a Cream Puff at home against the Kings, then a Banana Peel at Minnesota (both teams BtoB), before ruining it with a Cream Puff home loss to NY. The Knicks are playing very well recently, it isn't just Portland and N.O. that have fallen to them in the last couple of weeks, but you don't want to lose at home to a team like that.
The Blunder (2-1) had a decent week, winning a Cat 1 Cream Puff at home against the Warriors and a dangerous Cat 3 Banana Peel at Memphis, then dropping a Cat 2 Jawbreaker against the Cavs.
Phoenix (1-2) had their second straight losing week, and again, it is hard to blame them. They had a Jawbreaker (Cat 2) sandwich, with a nice home win against Orlando surrounded by two tough Cat 4 road losses to the D Team (Dallas and Denver). The Denver loss was on a back to back. With a week like that, you shrug, and say, "What did you expect?"
S.A. (3-1) had a pretty good week, opening with a Rocky Road loss at Utah, but closing with three wins, two Cat 1 Cream Puffs (Sacramento and Charlotte) and a Cat 3 Banana Peel at the Clippers.
Utah (3-1) had a really good week, losing one Cat 4 Rocky Road at LA, but winning three very tough Cat 2s at home -- San Antonio, Orlando (BtoB), and the L@kers (who were on a BtoB). Very nice week. People who wrote them off after the first three weeks obviously didn't know what they were talking about. They aren't going to be dominant, but they are a very solid team.
New Orleans (at home) and Houston each took a loss to losing teams, Portland and Denver each took two.
Helped themselves: Dallas, S.A., Utah.
Did OK: Houston, L.A., Blunder, Phoenix.
Hurt themselves: Portland, Denver, N.O.
The tables:
Cat 4 -- Rocky Road
| W | L | Played | Left | |
| Portland | 1 | 5 | 6 | 14 |
| Dallas | 4 | 2 | 6 | 14 |
| Denver | 2 | 3 | 5 | 16 |
| Houston | 3 | 4 | 7 | 14 |
| L.A. | 2 | 2 | 4 | 18 |
| N.O. | 0 | 7 | 7 | 16 |
| OKC | 3 | 3 | 6 | 15 |
| Phoenix | 3 | 6 | 9 | 11 |
| S.A. | 1 | 4 | 5 | 17 |
| Utah | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16 |
Dallas (at Miami) got the only Cat 4 win of the week. Notice that Phoenix only has 11 of these toughest games left, LA has 18. In less than two weeks, we'll have cleared four of these, and hopefully have picked up at least one win of the four. San Antonio does need to get their act together, they have a lot of hard games left.
Cat 3 -- Banana Peel Road
| W | L | Played | Left | |
| Portland | 5 | 2 | 7 | 14 |
| Dallas | 5 | 2 | 7 | 14 |
| Denver | 5 | 3 | 8 | 12 |
| Houston | 5 | 2 | 7 | 13 |
| L.A. | 1 | 0 | 1 | 18 |
| N.O. | 2 | 2 | 4 | 14 |
| OKC | 3 | 1 | 4 | 16 |
| Phoenix | 5 | 2 | 7 | 14 |
| S.A. | 1 | 1 | 2 | 17 |
| Utah | 2 | 1 | 3 | 16 |
This category is also fairly balanced in remaining games, with again L.A. and S.A. having the most remaining. Those two teams have a lot of road time left.
Cat 2 -- Jawbreaker Home
| W | L | Played | Left | |
| Portland | 3 | 3 | 6 | 15 |
| Dallas | 4 | 1 | 5 | 16 |
| Denver | 4 | 0 | 4 | 17 |
| Houston | 3 | 4 | 7 | 15 |
| L.A. | 6 | 2 | 8 | 13 |
| N.O. | 4 | 1 | 5 | 17 |
| OKC | 2 | 5 | 7 | 15 |
| Phoenix | 1 | 0 | 1 | 19 |
| S.A. | 2 | 4 | 6 | 14 |
| Utah | 5 | 2 | 7 | 14 |
Phoenix still has a lot of tough home games left. Here's where the "Blunder" don't look so hot, they haven't held home court well against good teams. Phoenix hasn't even had to try home games against good teams yet. Utah won all three of their games in this category this week.
Cat 1 -- Cream Puff Home
| W | L | Played | Left | |
| Portland | 5 | 1 | 6 | 14 |
| Dallas | 4 | 2 | 6 | 14 |
| Denver | 6 | 1 | 7 | 13 |
| Houston | 2 | 0 | 2 | 17 |
| L.A. | 9 | 0 | 9 | 11 |
| N.O. | 4 | 2 | 6 | 13 |
| OKC | 4 | 1 | 5 | 14 |
| Phoenix | 7 | 0 | 7 | 14 |
| S.A. | 8 | 0 | 8 | 13 |
| Utah | 6 | 1 | 7 | 13 |
The Hornets were the only team with a Cream Puff loss this week. Note that L.A. has played 41% (!!!) of their games as home games against losing teams. Houston is the other outlier -- they've got a lot of easy games left.
All Home Games
| W | L | Played | Left | |
| Portland | 8 | 4 | 12 | 29 |
| Dallas | 8 | 3 | 11 | 30 |
| Denver | 10 | 1 | 11 | 30 |
| Houston | 5 | 4 | 9 | 32 |
| L.A. | 15 | 2 | 17 | 24 |
| N.O. | 8 | 3 | 11 | 30 |
| OKC | 6 | 6 | 12 | 29 |
| Phoenix | 8 | 0 | 8 | 33 |
| S.A. | 10 | 4 | 14 | 27 |
| Utah | 11 | 3 | 14 | 27 |
N.O. and OKC were the only teams to lose a home game this week.. Little change on the schedule imbalances this week, L.A. has played the most home games and Phoenix and Houston the fewest.
All Away Games
| W | L | Played | Left | |
| Portland | 6 | 7 | 13 | 28 |
| Dallas | 9 | 4 | 13 | 28 |
| Denver | 7 | 6 | 13 | 28 |
| Houston | 8 | 6 | 14 | 27 |
| L.A. | 3 | 2 | 5 | 36 |
| N.O. | 2 | 9 | 11 | 30 |
| OKC | 6 | 4 | 10 | 31 |
| Phoenix | 8 | 8 | 16 | 25 |
| S.A. | 2 | 5 | 7 | 34 |
| Utah | 3 | 6 | 9 | 32 |
Before this week, Western playoff contenders overall were 47-46 in road games. That record is now 54-57 -- a poor 7-11 for the week. L.A. is finally on the road, having just lost the first of a five game trip. Phoenix is almost entirely at home for the next month.
All Games Against Winning Teams
| W | L | Played | Left | |
| Portland | 4 | 8 | 12 | 29 |
| Dallas | 8 | 3 | 11 | 30 |
| Denver | 6 | 3 | 9 | 33 |
| Houston | 6 | 8 | 14 | 29 |
| L.A. | 8 | 4 | 12 | 31 |
| N.O. | 4 | 8 | 12 | 33 |
| OKC | 5 | 8 | 13 | 30 |
| Phoenix | 4 | 6 | 10 | 30 |
| S.A. | 3 | 8 | 11 | 31 |
| Utah | 6 | 7 | 13 | 30 |
This is fairly balanced as far as games ahead against winning teams, very little difference between N.O./Denver at one end of the spectrum and Portland/Houston at the other end. The differences come in home/road breakdowns of those games.
All Games Against Losing Teams
| W | L | Played | Left | |
| Portland | 10 | 3 | 13 | 28 |
| Dallas | 9 | 4 | 13 | 28 |
| Denver | 11 | 4 | 15 | 25 |
| Houston | 7 | 2 | 9 | 30 |
| L.A. | 10 | 0 | 10 | 29 |
| N.O. | 6 | 4 | 10 | 27 |
| OKC | 7 | 2 | 9 | 30 |
| Phoenix | 12 | 2 | 14 | 28 |
| S.A. | 9 | 1 | 10 | 30 |
| Utah | 8 | 2 | 10 | 29 |
Notice that Dallas, Denver, and N.O. have lost four games against losing teams, L.A. none.
Back to Back Games Remaining
| Total | Cat4 | Cat3 | Cat2 | Cat1 | |
| Portland | 13 | 6 | 4 | 2 | 1 |
| Dallas | 12 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 1 |
| Denver | 15 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 5 |
| Houston | 17 | 7 | 4 | 2 | 4 |
| L.A. | 16 | 5 | 10 | 0 | 1 |
| N.O. | 11 | 3 | 6 | 2 | 0 |
| OKC | 15 | 8 | 3 | 3 | 1 |
| Phoenix | 14 | 3 | 5 | 3 | 3 |
| S.A. | 14 | 6 | 7 | 0 | 1 |
| Utah | 14 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 2 |
This factor is to the advantage of N.O., and disadvantage of Houston and L.A. Of remaining back to backs, the following are the number of games where the other team is on a back to back as well:
| Total | Cat4 | Cat3 | Cat2 | Cat1 | |
| Portland | 4 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 |
| Dallas | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 |
| Denver | 5 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Houston | 7 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| L.A. | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| N.O. | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 |
| OKC | 6 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 |
| Phoenix | 9 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| S.A. | 6 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 1 |
| Utah | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 0 |
Net, the games where only the Western contender in question is on a back to back:
| Total | Cat4 | Cat3 | Cat2 | Cat1 | |
| Portland | 9 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 1 |
| Dallas | 9 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 1 |
| Denver | 10 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 3 |
| Houston | 10 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 2 |
| L.A. | 15 | 5 | 10 | 0 | 0 |
| N.O. | 8 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 0 |
| OKC | 9 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 0 |
| Phoenix | 5 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 0 |
| S.A. | 8 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
| Utah | 8 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 2 |
Phoenix now has only five games remaining where they are on a back to back and the other team isn't -- and none are Cat 4s. L.A. has 15, but only five are against winning teams.
Now, games where we are not on a back to back, but our opponent is:
| Total | Cat4 | Cat3 | Cat2 | Cat1 | |
| Portland | 5 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 |
| Dallas | 10 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 4 |
| Denver | 13 | 1 | 0 | 10 | 2 |
| Houston | 8 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 6 |
| L.A. | 5 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| N.O. | 12 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 5 |
| OKC | 6 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 1 |
| Phoenix | 9 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 3 |
| S.A. | 8 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 3 |
| Utah | 11 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 4 |
Still a big advantage for Denver here -- most of their difficult home opponents will be tired. We'll not be getting any help on our road games the rest of the way.
The Coming Week
- Portland. Crisis time. A winnable Cat 1 Cream Puff against Sacramento, a much tougher Cat 2 against Phoenix, then on the road for a brutal 4 in 5 nights, all Rocky Road Cat 4s, starting this weekend at Orlando and Miami. Two wins this week and we will come home for a four game stand with a winning record and the worst stretch of the schedule behind us. Less than two wins and KP may be looking to make a move (he might be anyway, of course).
- Dallas. Four winnable games, perhaps none of them easy. They start with a Cat 1 against the Hornets (who keep edging towards .500), then a Cat 4 Rocky Road at OKC, followed by two Cat 2s at home against Houston and Cleveland.
- Denver. They start with two Cat 2 Jawbreakers at home (OKC and Houston). These two games wrap up a strange stretch where the Nuggets face 4 straight opponents who are on the second of a back to back. Then, they go out on the road with two Cat 3 Banana Peels at New Orleans and Memphis.
- Houston. Four in five nights, though two of the four are at home. They start with a Cat 1 Cream Puff at home vs. Detroit, then a Rocky Road BtoB at Denver, then another Cat 4 at Dallas, and finally a Cat 2 at home to OKC (both teams on a BtoB).
- L.A. Four in six nights. Open at Chicago, then a back to back at Milwaukee, then two nights off before playing at N.J. (Nets will be on a BtoB), and finally a back to back at Detroit. The Bucks are a Cat 4, the others are all Cat 3.
- N.O. After dropping a home game to the Knicks that would have put them at .500, the Hornets need to get some wins, and they have one in each category this week. They start with the toughest first, a Cat 4 Rocky Road at Dallas, then follow with a Cat 1 Cream Puff against Detroit (Pistons will be on a BtoB). Next is a testing Cat 2 against Denver, and they close the week with a Cat 3 Banana Peel at Toronto. Two wins needed, minimum.
- The "Blunder". Not an easy week for them. They start and end with Cat 4 Rocky Road games, both on a BtoB, starting at Denver and ending at Houston (who will also be on a BtoB). In between, they are at home for a Cat 2 against Dallas and a Cat 1 against Detroit. Two wins would make a solid week.
- Phoenix. The Suns are finally moving into the soft part of their schedule, but it doesn't get really easy quite yet. They host the Spurs for a Cat 2 Jawbreaker, then travel to Portland for a Cat 4 Rocky Road. They close at home with a Cat 1 Cream Puff against the Wizards, who will be on a BtoB.
- S.A. They start with a tough Cat 4 at Phoenix, then go BtoB to Golden State (Cat 3 Banana Peel). Then it is home for a Cat 1 Cream Puff against Indiana, who will be on a BtoB.
- Utah. The Jazz try to keep their momentum going, starting with a Cat 1 Cream Puff at home against Minnesota (looking for payback after losing at Minnesota recently). Then, they start a testing five game trip with a Banana Peel at N.J. (Nets will be on a BtoB), followed by two in two nights at Atlanta (Cat 4) and Charlotte (Cat 3).
Time for some home wins. Sacramento is no pushover this year, but you have to beat teams like that in Portland. Two wins this week and we keep ourselves in the hunt a little longer, as we look longingly for the Euro cavalry (Rudy and Nic) to ride over the hill to our rescue. Drop these games, and if KP hasn't been thinking about a move, he probably will be.
Coming next week, the jscot Silly Sched Projections (c).
30 comments
|
12 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I'm thinking 1 win this week and next week......ouch.
there will be even more weeping and gnashing of teeth.
I think the prediction for weeping and gnashing of teeth is money.
"A bizarre and extremely rare hybrid Blazer/Laker fan, Timbo has always struggled to contain the Beast Within, like Dr. Jekyll, Bruce Banner, or Ted Kennedy." — Miled Animal
Remember? I think I voted for 6 or 7 wins, which unfortunately looks on the money.
http://www.blazersedge.com/2009/12/1/1180338/todays-poll-december-record
Miller - Roy - Webster - Aldridge - Przybilla. Is that so hard?
lakers win
there, i just saved us all the headache of paying attention to the rest of the season
Blazer Fan
Be careful, or I'll quote you on that.
Actually, the Lakers have always been, are, and will always be Kobe-centric. The guy has a broken index finger (guides the shot) on his shooting hand and has yet to demonstrate that it is an injury he can play with at a star level, let alone a superstar level.
Their season has been front-loaded with home games as well — which implies it is back-loaded with road games.
Any more damage to Kobe, or any damage to Pau, and all bets are off. We’ve seen very clearly this year the thin line between a “deep” roster and a “depleted” roster — and the Lakers aren’t very deep to start with.
"A bizarre and extremely rare hybrid Blazer/Laker fan, Timbo has always struggled to contain the Beast Within, like Dr. Jekyll, Bruce Banner, or Ted Kennedy." — Miled Animal
Didn't Kobe play with half a pinky last season? or was it the season before
I’ll still take the Lake Show or Boston.
The rest of the teams quite frankly aren’t that good. Maybe a team like SA is resting for the regular season, but even that’s a stretch.
Blazer Fan
by leeroyjenkins on Dec 14, 2009 10:48 AM PST up reply actions
i'm not sure he ever got that pinky finger taken care of, but i don't know for sure.
that said, the index finger of your shooting hand is way more important than the pinky.
by DrivetheLane on Dec 14, 2009 11:11 AM PST up reply actions
point taken
(I still pick the lakers)
Blazer Fan
by leeroyjenkins on Dec 14, 2009 1:14 PM PST up reply actions
The rest of December looks tough. Perhaps this can be the team’s come-together stretch of games like the tough schedule at the beginning of last year.
I get the paper, so I don't care!
of the 9 games left this month
if the Blazers win more than 3 i’ll be pleasantly surprised.
by DrivetheLane on Dec 14, 2009 11:12 AM PST up reply actions
Five at home
If we play as well as we did in Cleveland or parts of the Milwaukee game, we beat Sacramento, Philly, and the Clips, and probably should be able to get at least one of the Denver/Phoenix games.
Miami has hit a rough patch, we might have a shot at them, but it will be very tough. Someone will have to have a big game.
San Antonio is also vulnerable right now, for some reason.
So I see three we probably should win. Beyond that, I see four (two home, two away) that I’d give us somewhere from 20-30% chance at. Out of four 25% chance games, you would hope to get one, maybe two if you are lucky.
Of course, we might drop one of the ones we should win, too.
#52
Cream puff game?
Hmmmm, we’ll see, looking forward to possible Portland tears tomorrow night.
So imitate the action of the tiger!.
Lend the eye a terrible aspect
- and teach them how to war!
Henry V iii
Check out the Summary Info at the top
“Cream Puff” is carefully defined, as a home game against a team that currently has a losing record.
I used to just call it Cat 1 (last year), but some people are numerically challenged and couldn’t handle it.
I freely recognize that lots of the so-called Cream Puffs aren’t that at all. We lost at home to Memphis, which was a Cream Puff, and you guys are at least as dangerous as they are.
The .500 dividing line is arbitrary, because you have to divide somewhere — there is a difference between playing Boston and playing Minnesota. Teams near .500 are one of the weaknesses of this analysis, and that’s what you guys are. Sorry if it bugs you, but my spreadsheet isn’t smart enough to draw more finely grained distinctions. If you win your next two games (which you certainly might do), this will transmogrify into a Jawbreaker. Does that make you feel better?
Probably doesn’t, but I tried.
#52
Sure, blame it on Excel!
Last I checked there are a few more columns available than four. With multiple worksheets and 10’s of thousands of rows on each is the spreadsheet really inadequate? Or have you, oh guru of Excel, have just been caught being lazy!
"I could almost fall asleep when he's got the ball," Demopoulos said of Roy. "That's how comfortable I feel with him. He always comes through."
(you still get a rec)
"I could almost fall asleep when he's got the ball," Demopoulos said of Roy. "That's how comfortable I feel with him. He always comes through."
Sigh
Because I’m such a gracious and benevolent future world leader, I’ll explain.
If I had more categories, I would have to post more tables, and the Internet software limits the size of a fanpost. I know this from experience.
Also, we’re dealing with human weakness here. Will the average peon (not talking about you or me, of course) really be able to wrap their head around more categories? Do you not remember that a certain person who will remain nameless but who supports that hideous team to the south (as well as Portland) couldn’t even handle Cat1 through 4, and I had to add silly names like Cream Puff and Rocky Road to placate him, thereby offending Sacramento fans? Just think, if it were six or eight categories, what would happen? And besides, I had a hard enough time coming up with fun food names for four categories, imagine eight!
There’s yet another problem. Don’t tell anyone, but this is all a vehicle to deceive people into thinking there is something of substance to the Silly Sched Projections. But the biggest problem with those projections is the small sample size of each category of game — and if the categories are even more finely grained, even someone as arrogant as me wouldn’t try to put over those kinds of numbers.
Now, why did I waste time on a semi-serious response to this? I have a theory, but it is too unpleasant to my ego to contemplate, so I’ll just move on….
#52
Wait - FWL's have ego?
You do have a ready explanation to cover your lack of motivational fortitude. Having raised two boys (girls are never this way) I can recognize the attempt to deflect attention when I read it.
And I was, of course, not lobbying for more categories at all. You realized that. Only defending the capacity of Excel (I began using spreadsheets in 1960 and eagerly pounced on Visicalc on my first PC – Apple II). Much as I dislike Microsoft for stealing every good idea I have to admit that Excel, with its immense capacity, has developed long past my need and usage. We don’t have to use a stack of 144k floppy disks to store one simple projection.
And I defer to your point on sample size. But that is the limitation of projections at all. The sample size for the number of variables is woefully inadequate to have a reasonable standard deviation and consistently makes complete fools of most of the writers each year (unless you count making a strong income from such meaningless projections having made the fool of the readers). Your projections are much more light-hearted and fun and of course they are more accurate because you project a shorter time-span.
"I could almost fall asleep when he's got the ball," Demopoulos said of Roy. "That's how comfortable I feel with him. He always comes through."
HEY, PEOPLE — WHERE ARE THE RECS FOR THIS POST???
"A bizarre and extremely rare hybrid Blazer/Laker fan, Timbo has always struggled to contain the Beast Within, like Dr. Jekyll, Bruce Banner, or Ted Kennedy." — Miled Animal
I am offended by the Kings being thought as cream puff's
Therefore I will not rec it.
No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
Oh, hes in the laegue two and Jayson Thomson and that Boggins dude on Milwokee, and Occur for the Jizz. Its a talented laegue.--Kfan in Korea
get a better record
then you won’t be “cream puff” anymore
Read my response to lietothegirls above
but I don’t live for recs, anyway.
#52
Houston has a brutal schedule coming up: 4 back to backs, incl. 2 where they have to fly pretty far
Adelman is complaining about the scheduling to the league, but too late to change something. At the moment we’re tied (in terms of games back) with them and the Spurs, with OKC 1 game back after giving up 2 in a row. Top 4 could be out of reach pretty soon, but playoffs still very much in discussion even if we don’t do that well until the new year.
Miller - Roy - Webster - Aldridge - Przybilla. Is that so hard?
Spare me Rick's tears
Everyone has rough stretches. The Texas teams, for the most part, have an easier schedule than most because they have no cross country flights. We play Phoenix at home, then fly to Orlando. Houston never has to do that.
They tend to get a lot of teams coming in on back to backs (scheduling two Texas teams back to back), and a lot of their back to backs are at home relative to some other teams. They have quick flights to San Antonio, Dallas, N.O., and OKC.
It is a rough stretch for them, but they also get two days off twice in that stretch. Compare that to our October and November, when we only had two days off once in five weeks.
As far as our chances, it really comes down to two questions. 1) Can we start to play better than we have? If so, we should be able to hit the playoffs. 2) Even if we don’t play better, can we eke out enough wins to stay in the hunt until we get a player or two back, and then put a run together?
#52
by jscot on Dec 15, 2009 2:41 AM PST up reply actions 1 recs
Every time I read your "schedule ahead" posts, I get hungry.
Man, I really got a craving for a cream puff rocky road bannana split sundae right now.
I know less than half of you half as well as I should like, and I like less than half of you half as well as you deserve.
The blazers will be 1-3 on the road trip
Miami is not a great at home team and I think the Blazers could come in a get a quick W. Everything else I have already emotionally set my self up for losses. That way, I cant really be dissapointed.
S
The Princess of Blazersedge
It just takes an iron fist to keep the riff raff under control and her princess hand is mad strong- Idoltime
San Antonio might be had if we are lucky, too
What do you expect out of these two home games before we go? Two wins would really help.
#52
"if we are lucky".........
I cant say we have been particularly luckly of late but sure , if there is a small amount of good fortune anywhere within the cosmos that could be granted to the Portland Trail Blazers on this roadtrip, I would say we could use it and will need it at San Antonio.
We have one win and if we can keep up with them, we can get the Suns tonight.
-Sophia
The Princess of Blazersedge
It just takes an iron fist to keep the riff raff under control and her princess hand is mad strong- Idoltime
which win do you expect to get on the road?
I’m with you on the setting myself up for losses thing. I think at road trip could very easily be an 0-fer. Snaking 2 home wins this week is huge I think, just for the fans to maintain some semblance of sanity.
by DrivetheLane on Dec 15, 2009 11:30 AM PST up reply actions

by 






















