MY TAKE OF WHAT'S GOING ON
As a Blazer fan for the past 30 years, who has seen most games either as a ticket holder or on TV over the years, here's my take of what seems so obvious to me and others I talk too as well. It is like the nursery rhyme of the Emporor Wears No Clothes, which was seen only by the child who was not politically correct to say what everyone was seeing, but couldn't say. Maybe, what I am about to write is off base and will rankle some feathers of other die hard Blazer fans who believe everything they hear and can't quite accept the politically incorrect version of what their eyes are seeing and comments heard from those they so want to believe. This will be a bit long. Oh well, there's always a delete button. I've rarely posted, but feel I must. Maybe this will stir up some interesting rebuttals and convince me I'm wrong in so many areas, but I doubt it, so here goes -
1. First, I have some real concerns with McMillan as a coach who I believe is only as good as his players, not a coach who makes them better. Some mediocre coaches have good to excellent records inspite of themselves, because of the quality of the talent they are surrounded with while others with poor records are actually much better coaches than their records would suggest as their coaching talents gets the best out of the least. These coaches are often unceremoniously dumped (fired) as if the mediocre talent they have to coach should somehow do the impossible. Unfortunately, I don't believe the latter is the case for McMillan. I believe he is riding the wave of the roster Prichett has put before him on a silver platter, but which is at risk of crumbling from frustration and dissention, much like the feelings last year of Frye (given away for nothing and is now resurecting in Phoenix) and Sergio (which lead to his being virtually given away and now thriving when given a chance to play his game in Sacramento the last 4 games) and I suspect are smoldering now among more than Andre Miller, Jerred Bayless and Rudy Fernandez. Further, is anyone impressed with McMillan's robotic substituion tendencies and patterns, apart from the debacle in Utah the other night when he threw in the towel early and allowed Bayless to show a glimpse of what we might expect if he were given quality minutes and gave Cunningham more than trivial minutes. Minutes from Nate generally are fairly rigidly doled out, regardless of how one is playing. Obviously, there are some exceptions as in the Utah farce. Further, I don't see any evidence that McMillan is a capable in the flow of the game strategizing coach, someone who can make adjustments on the fly as other top tier coaches seem to be able and willing to do with their personel, especially in the playoffs, where he has been so out coached in my view. McMillan may be a wonderful non-game coach, drill sargent, whatever, but I just don't see it under the lights. I would love to see McMillan not follow his roboticness as in the Utah game, when it could be seen from the very outset that the Blazers were going to be buried with their lackadaisical approach to the game from the opening whistle. The time out should have come within the first minute for him to get in their faces and turn it around before it was 11-2 or something after 2:30 minutes. It would be so refreshing to see substitution patterns not pre-ordained, because of matchups not making sense relating to the usual patterns of minutes awarded, etc. While it sometimes occurs, it is a rarity.
2. Brandon - McMillan made a major blunder in my view to so publically annoint Brandon as the "second coming" and saying many times that "this is Brandon's team." No it isn't (or shouldn't be). It should be his (McMillan's) and all the players making up the Blazer's, team. McMillan happens to be the coach of a budding superstar in Brandon, but it should not be viewed as his team. While McMillan may believe his world revolves around Brandon, no player should become bigger than reality for his team without losing credibility of the rest of the team, being viewed as a coach who doesn't treat everyone the same, that there are two sets of standards. The risk is for the development of a team of the "haves" and "have nots", those with the ability to screw up without accountability and those who play looking over their shoulders (Sergio, Jerred, Rudy, Frye, over the past two years are just examples). This phenomenon is clearly at play on this team now and was there last year as well. It has just so become clear to some with the addition of a premier point guard over the past decade who the "annointed one" is having difficulty adjusting to, and I believe has passive aggressively (maybe not knowingly on purpose) played in the manner that has sabbatoged Andre's ability to bring what he is still capable of bringing, namely, the ability to get everyone involved, especially Oden and Fernandez, but also Brandon if he would allow. The worst of this I've seen was the recent Warrior debacle where Roy often made no efforts to help Andre, standing around, making no efforts to come to the ball when there was a need, at least once leading to a steal of the ball because of his nonchalant play. We keep hearing ad nauseum that "this is Brandon's team." Now with his obscenely fat contract and it is "his team", why should he adjust to the new dynamics of the team roster and what others bring to the table if it doesn't fit what he is comfortable with. It means he would have to change/adjust, and why (he asks) should he be asked to do so if everything was so hunkie dory to award him with the contract he was awarded for what he has done in the past when paired with Blake. It appears that McMillan acqueses (?sp) to the likes and dislikes of Brandon, anything to keep him happy. Brandon's play, or lack of, in the Golden State game for anyone else would have have had him yanked from the game, as Andre was so unceramoniously in the last Utah game. The communication between coach and players, other than with Brandon, LA and now maybe Oden, has been atrocious. While McMillan says any player can come to him anytime with his concerns, he needs to initiate this much more than he does. The fired coach of the Nets had the respect of his players from what has been said about him since his firing, because he dealt with the last spot on the roster player just like the top guys. This is definitely not so here in River City. It sounds like major decisions go through Brandon to get his blessing on major matters, anything to make him happy. Brandon's comments recently indicate his own perception of his having nobility status, that he has final approval, that his teammates happiness will only occur if he is happy, etc. That, plus his not honoring his country by standing in the hall during the national anthem most night, is bordering on viewing oneself as above everyone else, a prima donna view. Brandon must develop (comes from the coach's help and his desire) the ability to move without the ball to get easy assists from others, not to just pace himself and turn it on when he wants, as he does at end of games. Watch him. He is terrible in moving without the ball, which is what makes the combination of he and Andre so painful to watch. It is not that Andre has lost his abilities as a point guard. Rather he is playing with someone who just wants the ball to do whatever he wants to do with for himself. For those wanting us to sign Chris Paul as a free agent, the same would happen, but even in a more magnified manner. How sad. Having said this, I think Brandon is a budding superstar, but he needs to come back to earth and make adjustments in his game like everyone else is expected to do. He will always be able to take over games when it is on the line in final minutes if that is what is needed, but that is NOT what is needed for most of the game. We need a team, not just Brandon, if we are ever to achieve to the next level.
3. Blake - What is up with McMillan's cover for the incredible mediocrity of Blake.
a) Yes, Blake hits 3's in mid-games when the game is not on the line, but he has choked more often than not when games are on the line in shooting or free throws in pressure packed situations (Orlando I think last year at home with 4 of 5 missed free throws at the end of regulation and then in the playoffs). He has no abilities to break down the defense or provide penetration abilities such as Jerred (11 foul shots in about 20 minutes against Utah the other night from penetration for the most part) or Miller.
b) Blake has minimal assist making abilities unless he makes an unspectaular pass to Brandon of LA from which they shoot and score, giving him one of the limited assists per game he gets. Of course he has few turnovers. Playing with such lack of risk always leads to few assists, but the rewards then are few.
c) Blake does not (likely can not) provide the up tempo game that our roster would thrive on with Andre and Jerred with the current roster except Blake and Brandon who seems to prefer the "give me the ball and let me create for myself" game, which doesn't require that he do much more than trot upcourt (save himself) and then do his one on one magic. That may be great to have that ability for the end of games, but it destroys the offense of the team for the bulk of games when everyone is so dependent on Brandon or LaMarcus.
d) Blake is an atrocious defender of the now many super quick point guards in the league. Jerred has shown that he has the quickness to play head to head with these top tier guards in defending them and will only get better with more experience/playing time. Other teams are playing very young players significant minutes and being rewarded in doing so, and so should the Blazers.
e) One of the best things that could happen for the Blazers would be for Blake to be traded to force the issue of this being a game built around a team of many gifted players, not just the "annointed ones". I don't see that happening, unfortunately. At this point, I think Jerred has conducted himself more professionally in holding his obvious frustrations as one could have ever hoped for, but, like Sergio last year, I don't think it will last, at least beyond this year if McMillan doesn't show more trust in him and his abilities. I wonder what Pritchett thinks that he can't say publically if different from Nate. We keeping hearing that Jerred is one of the hardest workers on the team and spends a huge amount of time and effort to improve his game. He has and always will be a player who can penetrate and score. His outside shot this year looks much improved, I suspect from Bayno's working with him. With more playing time, his assist making abilities will also improve. They already have, as has his shot and shot selection. His defensive abilities and work ethic toward that haven't ever been in question. The problem if Blake doesn't start is that he would harness the second unit which is so full of verve and energy that must not be dampened when you have such energetic and capable race horses.
4. Andre - Unfortunately, unless Brandon has a metamorphosis as a player to one who is willing/can move without the ball to be set up, their playing effectively together is doomed. This is not Andre's fault. Andre is the only one who seems to know how to or have the ability to feed Oden and get him involved and with easy shots for him. Unfortunately, neither Blake or Brandon provide that for Oden. It is no wonder as I watch this why Oden's offensive development has been stymied to some degree, since he is mostly on the court with Brandon and Blake. I suspect if stats are kept of the time he is on the court with Blake and Brandon vs others, it would be very telling. Oden's offensive game MUST be allowed to flourish. You don't draft a guy with his potential without so doing. I've been impressed by Andre's comments of team first, when I know he has to be agonizing, much like Jerred over what is going on. It is probably true that he will provide the most when paired with other players than Brandon who does nothing to allow Andre to do what he does and has for his entire career, namely get the most out of everyone else's abilities. Is there any wonder of the very positive comments Oden has made of Andre. Andre brings out the best of what Oden can bring at this point in his career. It was very telling in pre-season when Andre's play was singled out by a reporter in a very positive manner to Brandon, who immediately deflected that to defend Blake's play rather than acknowledge Andre's play. Good grief.
5. Oden - See above comments about he and Andre. I think Greg has made huge strides to show he has the abilties to become what we had all hoped from him when he was drafted. His offense is much improved and will continue to depending who he is surrounded by and whether he is given the confidence of getting him involved, as Andre has done when together, but much less so when paired with Blake and Brandon. He is an after thought with them. Also, I am impressed with his improvement in foot work and fewer fouls. I don't agree with McMillan's yanking him early as he often does. Let him learn as he uses up his fouls.
6. LaMarcus - When is LaMarcus going to be the tough big man we so need? I remember last year he so hated the label of being a "soft" big man, the same label that Frye has held his entire career. Unfortunately, then, as now, it is so absolutely true, especially on defense. LA relies way too much on his gifted athleticism and not as much on just being tough and on fundamentals, such as blocking out. What an incredibly gifted athlete LaMarcus truly is, but what a waste of much of it. He truly has the potential to be a superstar power forward if he only had the Karl Malone mentality. I hate it when we start games force feeding him and he is content with setting the tone with a jump shot. If he hits he, he seems content to stay with it. While he has a phenonmenal outside shot, it sets a lazy tone for him and others when he does it rather than play the inside game he is also so effective at playing, but at the cost of being banged up a bit.
7. Rudy - Cut him loose. Give him whatever slack he needs. Let him do what he does. He is one of the most natural, basketball intelligent and unselfish (sometimes to his detriment) players I have seen with such talent. To waste him as primarily a 3 point threat when he has so much more to bring is ludicous. I see chat of "would you trade him for this or that player." Have you watched some of his games when representing Spain on in the Olympics? Some of his play has been mind boggling. Take the harness off of this guy and let him play with abandon. He is so energizing and exciting. The entire team responds to this style of play far more than they do to Brandon. If anything they stand around for Brandon, but energize with Rudy. With some other coaches and other supporting players, like the coach of the Knick's or playing with Steve Nash or Chris Paul - oh my goodness. Would that be exciting of what?
8. Others -
a. Webster - He is only a shell of what I think he could become with the right coach and mind set. He seems so wanting to please that he is not playing free and easy, leading to these yo-yo levels of play from game to game, never knowing for sure what you are going to get from him.=. I fear another Jermaine O'Neal about to happen. We risk giving up on his potential as we did with Jermaine when the coach at that time (Dunleavy) was too afraid to give him a chance though he tore up practices we hear, getting virtually nothing in Dale Davis in return.
b. Cunningham - Where did this guy come from? How was he so missed after playing for 4 years in college in a quality program like Brandon did? There is something to be said for staying in for 4 years and maturing both as a player, but also as a person. What a find for a second round pick. This guy is the real deal. He is so fundamentally sound and also another very gifted athlete. He has so much more potential than Outlaw has shown after 7 years or so. He is both intelligent on and off the court. His basketball IQ must be pretty high and certainly far beyond that of Outlaw. He does naturally what Outlaw can't do even with reminders/screaming in his ear. He seems to do everything asked of him and well, has a great mid-range non-hesitant jump shot, is excellent at boxing out and rebounding and even shot blocking and is fearless. I would keep him in a heart beat over Outlaw next year. With the return of Batum next year, the two would be dynamos. If Cunningham is this good right now, imagine what he will become if given the opportunity, which he probably will get, if only because he has ingratiated himself with Brandon.
c. Prizbilla - A glue guy year in and year out. What you see is what you get. Andre will get him even more scoring opportunities around the hoop than he was ever used to playing with Blake and Brandon. It is a blessing for him to be paired most of the time with Andre.
d. Howard - I thought from pre-season that there would be more left in his basketball tank than what we've seen so far. Now with Cunningham's play, I would give those minutes to Cunningham, first because he has so outplayed Howard, but also for his ongoing further development.
e. Mill - Yes, I know he hasn't played a minute and probably won't this year, but I credit Paul Allen for speaking up to keep him over Collins and Udoka who are going nowhere when this kid I believe, as Allen must, has a real future in this league as another quicker than lightening PG, who may have more PG instincts than Jerred. I hope he recovers from his injury soon enough to get some NBADL experiences before next year. He really played very well in college and in the Olympics against top competition.
f. Pendergraf - Seems also to have potential from the summer league play. He also needs to get some quality time in the NBADL, but has certainly lost a lot of positioning as Cunningham has taken his opportunities and hasn't disappointed.
g. Pritchett - I am one of his biggest fans, but I think he was saved of a collosal bad decision by Tukoglu's decision to stand him up at the last second. Maybe by now he is less pissed and realizes how lucky being jilted he was. Same for not getting Millsap. I think we are far better off not having either of them and allowing this team to continue to jell. I think of future trades or signings, if Brandon is king, then they need to take that into consideration more than I think they have so far. For example, as much as I would love to steal Chris Paul in free agency, what we have seen with Brandon's inability (so far at least) to modify his game to accomodate what Andre brings, bringing Paul in would also probably not work, just like it probably wouldn't have had we been able to pry away Steve Nash. Both of them, like Andre, need the ball in their hands to create and boy do they to the betterment of their respective teams.
Oaky, I feel better. It's all off my chest. Does anyone else see the emperor has no clothes? If you missed out on nursery rhymes in your childhood, you likely have no idea what I'm talking about.
Now, Go Blazers!
64 comments
|
17 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Quickly
I’m on may home and only skimmed. But when I have 10 minutes I’ll read this in depth and then highly rec it. In other words I like everything I saw.
Also, give a year or two and knock on wood, it’s Greg’s team.
by jiminut on Dec 1, 2009 5:51 PM PST via mobile reply actions
Rec'd for sure
I have been hesitant to write a similar post. But I agree with nearly everything you said. The emporer indeed has no clothes.
by BlazerFanFromDenver on Dec 1, 2009 5:52 PM PST reply actions
B-roy
has sacrificed all season long and the team begins to die. He voices his concerns and is thrown under the bus by portland.
Yawn.....
This has all been said here before, by a lot of people who insist they know more than people who get paid to know. If you eliminated the Fantasy GM repetition posts, this place would be kinda quiet, and peaceful.
If you have nothing constructive to say about someone, I prefer that you say nothing at all.
"If Jumping to conclusions, Kicking others when they do not do well and Launching into senseless tirades were Olympic Events, some people around here would be Medal Contenders". Me
you mean, like Mike Barrett's blog?
there are plenty of places where never is heard a discouraging word…I prefer a healthy debate
When reached 40 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!
I too prefer a healthy debate
Just loathe people who live in a fantasy world. Some political and military figures come to mind. And know-everything Fantasy B-Ball Wunderkinds in a close third place.
If you have nothing constructive to say about someone, I prefer that you say nothing at all.
"If Jumping to conclusions, Kicking others when they do not do well and Launching into senseless tirades were Olympic Events, some people around here would be Medal Contenders". Me
I think the Oregonian had a FBB contest they were doing, about 15 years ago
after filling that out a couple of years for fun, I lost interest
I have followed the ups and downs of the Blazers for 40 years, however. (That means if anyone wants to refer to me as a “Wonderkind” I guess should be flattered…)
It’s the people who live in a “Nate and KP must know best” bubble that leave me scratching my head. They must be new to the game
When reached 40 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!
Nate is a good coach.
All coaches are only as good as the players they have. They do need to get the most out of those players but they can’t make them better players. Maybe they can adjust the game plan to hide certain deficiencies but that won’t win you any championships. They ball-players do.
I whole-heartedly agree that Nate shouldn’t have been so quick to annoint this “Brandon’s team”. Not because he isn’t talented enough but because there is too much other talent on the team as well. Also, for what a stand-up guy B is – he’s still young and that kind of thing can go to a guy’s head.
Cunningham “came out of nowhere” because people are too focused on stats. He didn’t average big numbers therefore it is automatically assumed he is not a first-rounder. That is a very “safe” way for teams to draft – but you will miss opportunities to add stellar players that way.
....formerly GonzoFan. Now, this has been a message from "The People's Alliance to Continue to Encourage Greg Oden on his Path to Dominance"
hard to argue with any of this
Solid points about every player. The only thing I would say is that I think Brandon has been horribly under-utilized so far this year. I agree about him needing to find ways for things to work for others, but much of what we’ve seen this year from Nate in games is and expectation for Roy to operate as just another role player off of the guards (and yes, he’s been used as a sf much more than a guard to date this season). The comments he’s made I can live with because I understand his frustration, but I do hope he finds a way to have more of a “solution” attitude than a “complain about the problem” attitude.
I agreed and almost wrote a post with all of your points. It’s nice to know there are others seeing the same things that I do. There could very well be some truths to all of it.
Aldridge needs to play big. Thats where is is effective with Oden. Two BIGS is hard to beat. LaMarcus only needs to know that everything he is looking for will come for him by being tough. He’s still young so I cut him slack, but in 2 years no more excuses.
Cunningham-I could not agree more. I would take him over Outlaw any day of the week. I have also questioned Nate giving him so many minutes in the first place. With all the talk of earning your minutes by playing the game hard/right, he should have been the last one off the bench. TO has discombobulated the team/game almost every time he steps on the court. We only have room for Oden to make that many errors, not both. Jerryd as well so long as he’s learning.
Rudy, I agreed with all that too. I was also going ot make the point(and have in another post I am going to make about the adjustments I feel the players need to make that might not be directly related to the game). When you watch Rudy play with Spain, he is Mr. at the right place at the right time, dunking, passing, dagger 3’ing you to death. It’s great. Then he comes to Portland and all Nate lets him do is shoot threes(which he is top 4-5 in the league natural). His Reggie Miller like release and footwork is REAL. His court vision to get the steals he does, could be invaluable. He cool under pressure. Definite need on a championship team.
Roy….Wow you are right. BROY is the man, but the current BROY is almost like the anti BROY. Off the court he is mentioning his ALL-STAR appearences and talking abou this happiness, meanwhile on the court he is playing like he does not want to break a sweat while simultaneously trying to make everyone happy. He is no longer ascerting himself with the ball, hesitates, decides not to drive then attacks slowly. He is doing the opposite. He probably should more of the old Brandon in real life and be willing to do what the team needs. If hes got the easiest bucket in his hand, take the ball and score or do what you do with authority.
All these guys seem to be playing with Nate’s expectations in mind. All of them hesitating, going against their instincts. Bayless, what happened to you? Straight assassin in the summer league. Could shoot like crazy, kill everyone, take em to the hole. Now with more strength, coaching, experience he can’t do 1/30th of what he did in summe rleague against real pros? I think thats a stretch.
I havn’t been cool with Nate’s coaching either and I suspect when it’s all said and done the Blazers may be rescued by him not wanting to sign an extension. Just like Hedo, just like Millsap.
The other point I would like to make about people saying that we do not have experience enough or enough knowledge to call out a coach as couch fans…….let me tell you this:
If you worked a job for multiple decades and ran through many supervisers, would you not be able to spot a good one? A bad one. Of course you could! You know when you see it. The eye and experience is there. We are not saying we could coach better than Nate, we are saying we know he’s not even par for the course anymore.
Great post, seeing the same things. REC
Land Rondo.
"He needs to realize that he can't stop every shot, especially from a smaller and offensively potent player. Get your hands up, make him shoot it over you, but let him shoot every once in a while. They score a little but you stay in the game a lot. And when you stay in the game...smashy smashy!" Dave on Greg Oden
Good stuff and recced.
Actually, mostly bad stuff. I think all this is true but it’s only one side of the coin for the most part. That’s okay as we get plenty of the other side other places. But you might want to learn the general manager’s name :)
Disclaimer: everything I know about basketball I learned on Blazersedge.
Yeah
Also BROY could do well watching Wade tonight. Thats a guy who has learned to put energy out all game. On O and D. BROY is going ot have to learn to do that to take this team to the promise land.
Land Rondo.
"He needs to realize that he can't stop every shot, especially from a smaller and offensively potent player. Get your hands up, make him shoot it over you, but let him shoot every once in a while. They score a little but you stay in the game a lot. And when you stay in the game...smashy smashy!" Dave on Greg Oden
One Disagreement
Sorry, but Cunningham is not and likely will never be as good as Travis. Cunningham cannot create his own offense, for one. And though we’ve heard about Cunningham’s tremendous athleticism, I’ve rarely seen it. Sure, he looks better than Travis did as a rookie, but Travis was 18 and Cunningham is 22 right now. By the time Travis was 22 he was capable of creating his own shot and averaged 10 points a night for us off the bench. Cunningham is like the Steve Blake of backup forwards right now. He doesn’t make many mistakes but he doesn’t do anything spectacular either. Travis does.
by hollywood robinson on Dec 1, 2009 8:24 PM PST reply actions
I believe it's a question of what you want from that spot in the rotation.
You’re assessment of both players is more or less on point. Right now this team is HURTING without Travis. After Roy and Aldridge—and arguably before Aldridge—he’s the best player on the team at getting his own shot. That “consistent” (yeah I just called Travis consistent) scoring off the bench is missing completely on this team, and we’re left watching Rudy and Martell perform like a yo-yo in his stead.
That said, I think Dante will be the better player for this team in two years. He’s a heady and fundamentally solid basketball player. He does all the little things that make a team run: setting good screens, knocking down mid-range jumpers, getting his hands on loose balls both off the board and on the floor. He may not be the business end of the big machine, but he’s a perfectly-crafted cog that makes it all run smoothly. As other scoring options develop in future seasons (Rudy, Bayless . . . Batum?) I see the need for Dante eclipsing the need for Travis.
Things happen for a reason they say, but I say there's a reason things happen.
sick of losing to the officials
I dont mind losing when we mess up but when we are getting our asses kicked by the officials, that just chaps my hide, Is it me or is it every time the blazers are kicking ass, the officials are up our asses … like bubba in prison… we have been doing great and just like last year , someone up there gets scared . I truly believe they dont want us to make it , because we are not the lakers.. I have been only watching basketball for 2 years now a blazer fan that is. and what I have seen with the way we are treated, is appalling.. I mean am I the only one that see this… we are a great team but we cant win against the officials. I want a fair game… what ever happen to officials being non bias Hun??? what happen to fare.
Fare's keep going up...
like death and taxes… I blame inflation…
False
You lost because the team is mediocre
Blazer Fan
by leeroyjenkins on Dec 2, 2009 6:51 AM PST up reply actions
bias is in the eye of the beholder
Officials make bad calls both ways. Sure there has been some egregious officiating of late (OT in Atlanta), but it all evens out over the course of a season.
Things happen for a reason they say, but I say there's a reason things happen.
I agree with your premise about Roy
Saying it is “Roy’s” team implies that the team operates on his system and not a fundamental team baskeball system. This is a system that did not and will not make it out of the first round of the play-offs since it is so focused on one player, albeit an all-star in Brandon Roy. Roy’s system is not conducive to a sustainably effective scheme in the NBA. It is too stagnant and too predictable.
Its obvious Roy has been programmed into the same mantra that it’s his team and he doesn’t need to make adjustments as indicated by his comments of him “making to big of a sacrifice” and how his teammates need to “make more of a sacrifice”.
Why does it have to be looked as a “sacrifice”? If Roy completes his game by learning how to move w/o the ball, to push the ball in transition and defer more to the point guards for distributing the ball he will be come a better all-around player. This season it feels like he’s turning into a chucker.
I didn't mean to turn you on
Like all the comments...
except one…
I still do not think we can say that BRoy and Dre can’t co-exist. Read Dave’s post. Or, watch tonight’s game: BRoy took it in the flow, Dre quarterbacked the O…
If Roy can adapt to the fact the the O needs to GO through GO, then everything will be fine…
My only disagreement is your assesment of Andre. He isnt the only one that feeds Oden. Roy and Rudy keep a keen eye on Oden too and post entry passing a mystikal talent that the team lacks. His ability to work the give and go is more impresive than his passing.
Roy is already playing without the ball more and lets face it Roy is damn effective with the ball. He is a real tripple threat. Miller has to play without the ball and in the Heat game he did well cutting to the basket instead of standing at the three point line. If the Blazers had Chris Paul, Paul would take a lot of open threes from Roy driving and drawing help.
Roy should have the ball more than Miller. Nate is right it is Roy’s team. Maybe he shouldn’t have said it but it is the truth.
Also the offense isn’t going to run through Oden. In spurts when the matchup is right then yes but Oden isnt half the scorer Dwight Howard is. He should finish not initiate.
It's not Roy's team
Please stop
Blazer Fan
by leeroyjenkins on Dec 2, 2009 6:51 AM PST up reply actions
Did you see what I saw tonight?
After posting I watched the game hoping to see light at the end of the tunnel. I didn’t. Did you see what I saw?
1. I saw Blake with zero points going into the fourth quarter with I think 3 assists, only to hit 3 3’s when it was already a foregone conclusion of another loss. He is the least productive starting guard in the league of either position. What keeps him in the lineup other than BRoy’s advocacy?
2. I saw Bayless riding the pines when we needed his exuberant intensity on offense and defense. He played all of several minutes in total and I think none in the second half when we actually had a chance to close the gap..
3. I saw BRoy playing without intensity, taking a number of ill advised shots when others had far better looks. Yes, I saw his too little to late 3’s toward the end of the game.
4. I saw why Miller should get twice the minutes of any other point guard. Give him time with the team and other getting used to what he brings for them, and he will be fine. Now if BRoy would only play off the ball. He brought the least energy of any of the Blazers tonight, as he has many nights of late.
5. Oden played very well, very hard and with passion. As I stated in the original post, I have a lot of faith that he will develop into the force we all hoped he would/could, but he needs others to support and feed him than Blake, because he is not otherwise getting it from Roy.
6. Did you see Fernandez’ face on the bench after being taken out late in the game? To his credit, he is keeping his mouth shut, but boy if body/facial language could speak, it said legions. I can’t imagine him being on this team for long under the current conditions. What a loss this would prove to be. Right now, on the right team, he would be dynamic and a crowd pleaser. He has to be unleashed and free to be Rudy!
7. I’m having a blank on the name of the Heat’s starting power forward (last year’s second pick) but did you see how active he was. He was the antithesis of the play of BRoy who spends much of his time without the ball standing around, which in every game has lead to one or more turnovers because of his lack of help. Have you seen a give and go between BRoy and Oden as we do with Miller and Oden? Few and far between yet so available as taken advantage of every game by Miller. Why not Roy? Don’t misunderstand me. I also think BRoy is an incredible talent, but he has so far to go to be the “anointed one”.
8. While Outlaw does have the ability to create his own shot as well as a nice 3. if that’s all you want or if that is how you judge his total game by, how short sighted. His limitations and lack of basketball IQ in my mind more than outweigh his agreed upon ability to create his shot. He rarely goes to the hoop, only part way or staying put and leaping while taking Kobeisk jump shots that put your heart in your throat and then a “whew, he made it” or “what was that” when he misses.
9. Finally, I disagree with the last posting about wanting the ball in BRoy’s hands most of the time. That’s what we get with Blake. He should be set up unless at the end of a close game when we ride his back, but not for entire games. With the style of play of Blake and BRoy, don’t expect more than what we got last year. The Rockets so exposed that combination and how far that will take us.
10. I agree that the officials seem to swallow their whistles on obvious calls we deserve to go our way, but that’s the least of our problems. I wish I could say that I have faith that Nate can figure this all out and see the light, but I don’t. We are going into a tough period with the schedule. It could get ugly and in not too long. Why do you think we have such a good record. Look at the schedule we have played for a hint. It is unlikely to continue without some significant changes.
I do share your concern for the under-utilization of Rudy and Martell.
Those guys are potential stars not being adequately developed and integrated into the core of the team. Why is Rudy not the 3rd guard in the 3 guard lineup ? I will so hate it to see Rudy or Martell wind up flourishing on some OTHER team. Bayless also has that potential. Fortunately there is no denying Oden his opportunity to grow (at least till he gets a couple fouls).
Howard showed you something tonight, though, huh?
Good observations, if you just weren’t so hard on my pal Travis… he’s not done learning.
"Travis went all wang-dang diddly wubba SPROING wow-wow on everybody " Dave's recap, season opener
Roy took a lot of shots because he was trying to carry an anemic offense on a team playing without its 2nd leading scorer thats trying to prevent a three game losing steak. For the better part of this season and in the first two games of this losing streak Roy played without the ball more than he normally does and more than he did last season.
Also you cant blame Roy for not clicking on the give and go. That play is underrated by the entire league. Oden’s dimes drooped my jaw. Thats a rare skill in the NBA and if Andre Miller does nothing but teach Oden how to pass then he is worth the signing.
Regarding the refs
Usually the team that hustles harder and is more aggressive ends up getting more breaks. That hasn’t been the Blazers lately.
put a body on 'em
Oden >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Roy
Blazer Fan
by leeroyjenkins on Dec 2, 2009 6:50 AM PST up reply actions
We need a team, not just Brandon, if we are ever to achieve to the next level.
I think that any Blazer fan who still remembers the ‘77 team cringes whenever there’s a clear out and one Blazer (no matter how talented) goes one-on-one. I think it’s in a long-time Portland fan’s DNA to appreciate good team passing more than individual play
With that in mind, I was encouraged by these comments from Greg, tonight
“It’s not just me. It’s everybody,” Oden said. "I’d definitely like to put all the blame on myself. But we win as a team, we lose as a team. And when I’m not in there, other guys take over. It’s not just if I’m in the game or not.
“And I’m not meaning that in any bad way; I don’t want nobody turning that in a bad way. I’m just saying, it’s all of us going in. And we all need to click.”
Odens gets it. He deserves unselfish teammates who will pass and cut, like Bill Walton had. That’s what wins championships, not ISOs and indifferent defense
When reached 40 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!
That's why Oden gushes when Miller is in the game
I’m starting to think that Oden and Roy can’t play together.
Blazer Fan
by leeroyjenkins on Dec 2, 2009 6:50 AM PST up reply actions
Yeah I think McMillan and Brandon are great individuals to make a bad team good,
but for some reason, unless they adjust, i have a tough time seeing them making this team go from good to great. theres no way what we are getting out of the team now is close to what it could be getting.
The only reason i shoot 3's is cuz there ain't no such thing as 4's.
by cpt.morgan.ahoy! on Dec 1, 2009 11:03 PM PST reply actions
I hadn't really thought of that before ...
Hard to know why a player like Turkoglu doesn’t want to come here when he’ll obviously take a huge backseat to Brandon. Not that I think he’s better, but how the hell are we going to attract anyone significant when they’re clearly going to have a diminished role?
You folks are smoking psychedelic dubage.
You want to take the ball out of Roy’s hands and give it to Andre Miller?
Come on now. How long is it going to take before the league figures that out? All they are going to do is stick with their man. Its the Jason Kidd defense and Miller is no Jason Kidd. Miller cant draw a double team and his jump shot off the pick and roll is no better than Roys.
Roy is averaging 6 assist on this losing streak. He isnt the problem.
The main problem in this losing streak is perimeter defense and I don’t think any of you ganja spikers have mentioned it.
by Kaanyr Vhok on Dec 2, 2009 12:48 AM PST reply actions 1 recs
Defense is a whole other issue, the OP is mostly about the offensive end of the floor.
And the offense has been stagnant and inefficient of late. I agree that Roy needs to play off the ball better. They should run him off of screens, some off-ball picking and rolling/popping with Aldridge (or possibly Oden).
Let’s look at a simple basketball play. Miller starts to break down the defense with the option to hit Roy off a down screen for an elbow J. If he feels the defense or the help comes he can then do his B-Roy thing by putting it on the floor. There also remains the option of the big man reading the defense off the pick and either popping or rolling to the rim for the extra pass.
Now think about how this does not work when Brandon Roy doesn’t move well without the ball. If he just stands on the wing or is lazy coming off the screen, everything ends up covered. He forces up a shot, drives right into the help defense (and maybe kicks to the corner), or backs out to reset. His big was covered because his man had time to recover due to lethargic play from Roy. The shot the play was designed for also was not there. They are left creating on the fly and looking to third and fourth options.
This lack of energy and hustle is not just on Brandon Roy though. It is the hallmark of the last three games, the reason for the utter lack of defense and the offensive stagnation. Combine that with the confusion of an ever-changing lineup (due to injuries, coaching, inconsistent play . . . pick one), and you end up in the situation we’re in right now. All of these things can be fixed, it just has to start with the leaders of the team bringing it every minute of every night. If the leaders do it, everyone else will follow suit (imagine that!), and that is why Brandon Roy needs to play his ass off on a regular basis.
My ideal lineup by April: Miller/Bayless, Roy/Rudy, Batum/Webster, Aldridge/Cunningham/Pendergraf (change of pace at backup), Oden/Przybilla. We are suffering from injury concentration at the forward position, but this team will be more than OK in the long run assuming they play hard and learn to adjust to players moving in and out of the rotation.
Things happen for a reason they say, but I say there's a reason things happen.
Defense isn't a whole other issue defense is the issue.
When you are giving up 53-60% shooting you lose. Miller and Roy played well off of each other against the Heat. Miller wasnt spotting up for threes and the team still loss because they gave up 53% shooting from the field and 41% from the three. Oden’s 11 offensive rebounds would have made up for the team’s poor shooting if the defense was there. How many open shots did Boozer have? How many open threes did Mayo, and Richardson get?
Thanks for reading the first six words of my post . . .
Believe it or not there’s more to it than that. The point I’m trying to make is that there’s an overall lack of energy and effort on the team, and it starts at the top (Roy). Couple that with the confusion of guys playing new roles in new spots in the rotation and you start to see the kind of defensive breakdown we’ve been experiencing. I simply used the offensive end of the floor to make a point that applies to both phases of the game, and by doing so I attempted to address multiple problems at once. The reason I chose offense was that I was replying more to the bulk of your first post and the OP, which were more about the Roy/Miller interaction. I said “defense is a whole other issue” not because it’s not an issue, merely because it was one I wasn’t going to discuss at length.
“This lack of energy and hustle is not just on Brandon Roy though. It is the hallmark of the last three games, the reason for the utter lack of defense and the offensive stagnation.” That sentence pretty much sums it up, it’s the topic of the third paragraph and the first major point drawn in the post . . . I hope you got far enough to read it.
Things happen for a reason they say, but I say there's a reason things happen.
Roy is part of the problem, yes
Blazer Fan
by leeroyjenkins on Dec 2, 2009 6:49 AM PST up reply actions
Great points, despite some of the name typos
I’ve been thinking a lot of the same thoughts. The most recent hypthetical is: how much better would the team play if we traded Roy and Blake and got a top tier SG (or maybe PG)? Joe Johnson and change, for instance. My guess is the ball starts moving a lot better and it is a team that is more fun to watch.
put a body on 'em
Some?
all the names had typos lol…
none the less good post.
Rip City Baby...People have no idea what is coming.
Follow my twitter www.twitter.com/PDXBlazersFTW, @PDXBlazersFTW. Lots of random Blazer Posts from links I find around the blogosphere.
I like that lineup
Rudy guards quick PGs better than Miller, Miller guards most SG well, and Roy checks the three well.
Roy has serious problems guarding the better 3's in the league.
Having someone who’s not even close to an elite defender shift to check people out of his comfort zone is not a solid defensive strategy IMO. One of Roy’s defensive strengths at the 2 is that he is on the bigger side for the position (6’6" 211). Take that away and he’s in trouble defensively against the bigger and stronger small forwards of the league.. Finally he is the team’s “superstar” scorer, and you really don’t want him running himself into the ground on the defensive end trying to cover up a mismatch.
Things happen for a reason they say, but I say there's a reason things happen.
Roy isnt getting lit up though.
He did a good job on Gay without much help. His problem isn’t onball defense his problem is that he over rotated and gave up three pointers and he wasnt alone. Roy’s defense against SFs is a lot more reliable than Miller or Blake’s defense against PGs and Rudy’s defense against SFs.
First unit: GO LA BROY RUDY MILLER
1) Oden needs Miller and Rudy
2) Miller needs Rudy’s 3 pt shots
Second unit: JoeL Dante Webster Blake Bayless
1) Bayless can draw fouls and break down the defense and provide proved scoring ability
2) Blake and Webster and spread the floor for Bayless and hit open 3s.
In Pritchett We Trust
Whoever that is. Ha. Several good points though. It appears the writing is on the wall for Nate unless he has a radical breakthrough, and soon. I think Brandon’s prima donna behavior is being overblown. The guy is a team player, but he needs to figure out that running iso’s and dummy pick and rolls over and over and over is not the best offensive strategy long term. It worked in ‘07-08 because Roy was still surprising people and last year to an extent through sheer will power and good vibes (which have a lot to do with confidence and, subsequently, shooting percentage), but by the playoffs, Houston really had our number and we had nothing else. Andre is going to ultimately make this team much better offensively, but it appears it’s going to take a while for Roy and McMillan to get on board. Steve Blake is taking too much blame. The dude works hard and plays smart, despite some of his weaknesses (poor penetration, can’t create his own shot, poor d on quicker guards). When team confidence is up and people know what’s going on, Blake will be back to nailing 3’s, free throws, pushing the tempo (yes, he does this—it’s Brandon who doesn’t) and contributing whether he comes off the bench or starts. Blake is the kind of role player that thrives on championship teams.
Absolutely on point about Rudy. Let the dude run and make some mistakes. The reward will be much greater than the risk.
Also, I like RONO in HKs two lineups. Those units should, in theory, work nicely together.
I too am not a bit tamed, I too am untranslatable - Song of Myself, Walt Whitman
Gotta get this off my chest...
Great bit. Here’s my two cents.
1. Tired of hearing how these three are struggling to play together. FIGURE IT OUT. Oden down low, Aldridge up high, Roy on the wing. Take what the D gives you. Is that so hard? McHale, Parrish and Bird did it. So did Kareem, Magic and Worthy. We have the perfect triangle.
2. Brandon is a very talented young man. But he’s not perfect. He can’t use an on-the-ball screen as well as most high school players. He must realize his iso’s cause the team to stand and watch. Move w/o the ball and get your jumpers. Great shooter. Break down your man when we need a bucket, not every play. You may not be the high scorer every game. Just WIN, baby.
3. Blake contributes little. Yes, he is consistent, but so is a scar. Doesn’t mean it’s valuable. Not hating on the guy, he has a role, but starting over Andre? C’mon. Many people seem to agree. Start Miller, Make Bayless the point, put Blake on the second unit to provide “consistency”.
4. I’m beginning to get on the “Dump The Coach” bandwagon. We have too much talent to be losing like this. I know its only three games, but the effort isn’t there, and that tells me these guys are unhappy. DON"T lose our talent! We are the deepest team in the league (minus perhaps the Lakers…. GRRRrrrrr)
5. GO BLAZERS!
Not that I dont think BROY has to step his game up,
but the standing around thing is a part of the teams philosophy.
KP and Nate talked about “surrounding Roy with shooters”. I have read Batum and Rudy slightly mocking the Blazers in offseason articles about how they are playing “Portland Ball” which is “stand around and wait for a shot”.
Land Rondo.
"He needs to realize that he can't stop every shot, especially from a smaller and offensively potent player. Get your hands up, make him shoot it over you, but let him shoot every once in a while. They score a little but you stay in the game a lot. And when you stay in the game...smashy smashy!" Dave on Greg Oden
Warriors fan here
First off, loved your analysis. Very in depth, good read. I’ve become a bit of a closet blazers fan (until my warriors get relevant again I feel okay saying this). I would do anything for management like Prichett. Your team is absolutely loaded with talent, and most of it young. Consider Batum and Outlaw are hurt, it only gets deeper when you’re healthy.
Here’s my outsiders take. McMillan needs to go. I think he is slowing down the team. Yes he’s got them playing better defense, but I think he’s harming Brandon Roy. I have seen the problem with Miller and Roy, and it makes sense. but I don’t believe Roy can’t play off ball. I just think McMillan is tactically inept coach for the most part. We’ve seen some of the most ball dominant players in the league (jordan, kobe) learn to play off ball at times, and it saves them energy for the long haul. This team has the talent to challenge more than they do. They r becoming what New Orleans was becoming under Scott though. So focused on defense and toughness, that offensively they become a one man show, with no ideas.
when you look, bayliss is an awesome talent. No reason he can’t play PG in a ball movement offensive PARTICULARLY if you play Rudy and Roy off him. A better coach can get Brandon to play w/ Miller for periods of time effectively. I realize both are ball dominant players so they will never play 36 mins a game. However if Miller and him can play 15 or so minutes together, then let Miller lead the team when Roy rests, that’s more than enough. Especially when you consider Miller’s age and he won’t have legs to play 30+ mins a game every night for next years.
Also with LA you see lack of coaching. He’s a finesse guy, and that’s fine, he won’t ever be a banger. But you have Oden/pryzbilla along with cunningham (Awesome backup PF), you don’t need LA to get in there like Tim Duncan. However in a higher tempo system he could see better looks, and with more movement he can get a lot more mismatches in the post which he can take advantage up with his ridiculous length (I was hoping Brandan Wright would become our LA, but injuries have really hurt him).
I just think, if this team had someone like Adelman or Westfall, they’d be doing a lot better. there are too many coaches too focused on defense to a fault, that they become a boring uncreative offensive team and worse by default. Sure it works if you’re boston and you have garnett, peirce, allen who don’t need coaching on offense. But you don’t
Leave it to Warrior fan to disregard defense.
Again the team just gave up 53,60,and 53% shooting. I dont care how creative your offense is or how you run you are going to lose when you cant get stops. They just scored 100 points without Aldridge in a game where Howard was the only player to shoot over 50%.
My main issues with Nate are on defense. They dont press like they did last season and they dont play zone like they did the season before.
I was trying to compliment your players (and management)
I think McMillan is too set on a slow tempo and it doesn’t compliment your talent. Granted Portland has enough talent to succeed in most systems, I think a faster tempo pressing style with more ball movement could benefit more. Ok you’ve allowed some hot shooting. That’s 3 games, until it becomes an ongoing trend I will just count it as a small lapse.
Overall Portland still has 3rd best fg% defense (and barely at that, opponents shoot 43.8% against Portland, 2nd is OKC w/ 43.7%… lakers are #1 at 42.3).
On the contrary you are shooting 45% ranked 17th in NBA. When I look at your roster, I see little reason why you should be so low offensively. So while your defense has been very strong, you aren’t exactly capitalizing off it the way you should. Compare that to last year portland was 8th in FG%.
I can’t fully put my finger on it, but Portland has too much offensive talent to struggle this bad. And increasingly it’s becoming BRoy iso, make a play… which he’s more than capable of, but its not exactly most efficient way
Corrections . . .
1. Kevin Prichard
2. Jerryd Bayless
3. 30 year Blazer fan ???
3. Andre Miller is a talented scorer/passer/creator, but he can’t shoot outside
of 15 feet and is a poor defender. The Blazers need a good/great perimeter
defender to get this team moving in the right direction.
4. If you start Miller and move Steve Blake to the 2nd Unit, who creates for the
2nd Unit ? You’ve already stated that Blake can’t create or assist. It’s common
consensus that Bayless isn’t a pure PG or passer. Rudy ?? He can’t break anybody
down off the dribble. He needs to come off picks or be on the move.
???????
5. Blake is a terrible player according to you and other posters. Why would any other
team trade for him ? Would they trade us a bag of Cheese puffs ? Perhaps Pritchitt
should pull that trigger.
COINCAST SUCKS !!!!
It's GO time !
great post REC even tho its been recced into oblivion
already.
so many ignorant romantic fans in portland , you see them in your comments, and they just refuse to recogize/cantrecognize/dontcare/dontknow the issues that are plain-as-a-naked-man-on-a-busy-street , and right in front of our collective faces.
You hit every issue right on top of the head.
-Princess Sophia
The Princess of Blazersedge
It just takes an iron fist to keep the riff raff under control and her princess hand is mad strong- Idoltime
I think these are excellent points.
I’m losing faith in Nate fast. It seems his system benefits only Roy and to some extent Blake. Everyone else’ game is stifled, especially Rudy. And I’d hate to lose Rudy. I can’t imagine he’s gonna be happy for long.
You get the sense that we’re only seeing a whiff of what most these players are capable of.
If NBA 2k is any way to say that, I would say, yes.
For those of you who do not understand the complexities of the game due to a lack of experience, feel free to leave your opinions out.
When you use the players with your strategy and to their skills, they are very hard to beat. You can take Oden and Aldridge and play BIG <insert Nate’s “offensely and deffensely” comment here>. Batum is streaking out to finish breaks with authority. It at times is beautiful. Many more examples, but it does give you perspective on what these pieces look like under a different system.
Land Rondo.
"He needs to realize that he can't stop every shot, especially from a smaller and offensively potent player. Get your hands up, make him shoot it over you, but let him shoot every once in a while. They score a little but you stay in the game a lot. And when you stay in the game...smashy smashy!" Dave on Greg Oden
I would absolutely say they are capable of much more on the actual court.
I have felt this the last two years, by last years playoffs I knew the team was used incorrectly in general or based on players. I think Nate could be capable, but he needs to read the Art of War or just somehow John Wooden his game up.
Land Rondo.
"He needs to realize that he can't stop every shot, especially from a smaller and offensively potent player. Get your hands up, make him shoot it over you, but let him shoot every once in a while. They score a little but you stay in the game a lot. And when you stay in the game...smashy smashy!" Dave on Greg Oden
Thanks for you responses to my original post
Well, my original post has accomplished much of what I had hoped for. It touched a nerve with just about everyone who has responded it seems, from those who apparently harbor much of the same views as I, based on just observing the obvious, to those who are so in love with the Blazers and everything they do that they can’t see that the “emperor wears no clothes”, to those who missed the entire post because of being hung up on the fact that I misspelled KP’s and Bayless’ names, questioning my having been a fan of the Blazers for 30 years (actually 31), to not quite getting how I view Brandon and Blake. Oh well.
I thought my post was pretty clear. After 50 or so responses, no one has presented what I think is a convincing counter argument to my analyses, just arguments because Brandon and Blake can do no wrong. I really wonder what the homers on TV and radio really think. We will never know, because I don’t think they have the liberty to voice the concerns I have and echoed now by others if they even share some of them. Rice occasionally will let slip comments that suggest he gets it. If things don’t turn quickly, this could get ugly during these coming games against teams that could prove hard to beat. Unlike last year when we took everyone by surprise with our record in playing probably the most difficult first 25 games, ours so far has been one of the easiest schedules. Look who we have played, and even then we were beaten badly by an 8 man Golden State team (one form the developmental league just signed that day) and Memphis on our home court. If that doesn’t cause introspection, nothing will.
As for Blake, how can I make my views more clear. He is absolutely solid in his mediocrity. He likely is in the bottom 10% of starting PGs in the NBA and the bottom if considered an off-guard in my view. He brings the ball down the court and gets in into Brandon’s hands very well and shots a quality 3 in non-money, game on the line, situations. He can’t penetrate, break down the defense, get the ball into Oden’s or others’ hands in a meaningful way and set up position, and is a major lability on defense against even mid-level other PGs. Nate’s view that he doesn’t make mistakes is at the expense of his providing so little for the lack of “mistakes.” If you don’t make major contributions or take any chances, especially being a starter, where does this give you right to start? Nate has publically said numbers of times over the years that you will be rewarded by what you do in practice. Obviously, this is not true. We hear that Bayless is consistently one of the most dedicated workers on his game and practices harder and and longer than anyone. Bayless comes across to me as a young man driven to succeed who will do whatever it takes to do so, if only given a legitimate chance to show what he can do. I would be as frustrated as him based on what he has done to be rewarded with playing time and what Nate has repeatedly said but not honored. What I have seen is pretty compelling. Actually, if you are not asking of your point guard to do what I want a point guard to do, namely what Miller does of getting everyone involved (not just Brandon) and getting them the ball where they like it, then what is the argument against Bayless, if you think he is not a classic point guard? I have no doubt he can do what Blake does in terms of getting the ball up the court and get it to Brandon if forced to do so, but he brings energy, intensity, defense, penetration, and other intangibles we so desparately needed and are not getting with Blake. How often have you seen a meaningful and creative assist from Blake? Nada. They are very few and far between.
For this incredibly talented team put together by KP (not going to risk misspelling his name since I took heat for it from the original post) to go to the next level, I think two major things have to happen.
1. Blake has to go even if it is with Nate screaming. That would be half of what is needed to open it up for everyone beyond Roy.
2. Roy needs to quit feeling like he is a martyr having to sacrifice when he has just been awarded a gazillion dollar contract, while Rudy is playing for a relatively paltry sum, giving up millions in Europe just to play out his dream of playing in the NBA. I just don’t see it.
Despite the disparity, Rudy plays with pazzaz and brings excitment. Roy has played without energy or enthusiasm much of the season, often standing around often when without the ball (atrocious – maybe all his money is weighting him down), not contributing to the offense unless the offense is him, playing lighthearted defense, whining on non-calls, resulting in getting back late on defense, etc. Someone he trusts needs to sit down with him and set him straight. That clearly is not going to be Nate after he has so unabashedly anointed him and who seems to think Roy can do nothing wrong, ie, when things are not right, it has to be the play of someone other than Roy or Blake.
I honestly wonder what is going through KPs head through all of this and whether he sees the world as does Nate or more as I have posted. I would dearly love to see this incredibly deep and talented team play team basketball instead of the one on one games Brandon and LA like playing and supported by Nate’s lack of imagination and see much more of the offense being developed to run through Oden with better utilization of Fernandez and Bayless.
I agree with the poster regarding Blake playing with the second unit. He would absolutely dampen the spark that unit provides. That is the reason if not good enough to start, Blake needs to be moved elsewhere, because he wouldn’t fit with the second unit either, being even more of a misfit, and I can’t see him being demoted to Bayless’ current end of the bench position, if only because you don’t want and unhappy Roy now do we?
OK, I know this is rather strong, so let it fly.

by 






















