Charlie Rosen critiques the Blazers

over 2 years ago thomasikehara 16 comments 0 recs |

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Rosen is a joke

He watches each team play once a season and then draws conclusions about them. What a terrible analyst.

by jksnake99 on Nov 9, 2009 11:33 AM PST reply actions

Actually this was a pretty good player by player analysis, and the goal was to review what happened in that one game against San Antonio

All in all I would agree that he often is too in love with his own observations.

But slowly things happen that they cannot help and the Blazers Fellowship of the Ring begins to break apart

by Norsktroll on Nov 9, 2009 12:06 PM PST up reply actions

fair enough

I didn’t even read the article (only skimmed it). I just posted my default Charley Rosen rant.

by jksnake99 on Nov 9, 2009 1:35 PM PST up reply actions 2 recs

Good enough for me

"Woulda, Coulda, Mighta and Shoulda – the Four Horsemen of the Procrastocalypse" - Red-5

by jscot on Nov 9, 2009 11:51 PM PST up reply actions

Yeah, Charley Rosen did a solid job analyzing individual performances this time around here.

Although Rosen tends to miss the mark frequently, he still has insightful critiques now and again.

Yet, nothing tops Rosen’s irascible comments toward Don Nelson, as they’re similar to two grouches at a retirement home with a long-standing rivalry.

Dear Paul Allen:

Fire Nate McMillan & hire Jeff Van Gundy.

Sincerely,
AK1984

by AK1984 on Nov 9, 2009 8:41 PM PST up reply actions

I have insightful critiques occasionally, too

Doesn’t mean anyone should listen to them.

"Woulda, Coulda, Mighta and Shoulda – the Four Horsemen of the Procrastocalypse" - Red-5

by jscot on Nov 9, 2009 11:52 PM PST up reply actions

ditto

by prof.mike on Nov 9, 2009 1:46 PM PST up reply actions

I criticize you for reading Charlie Rosen.

*Unless KP has a secret plan that makes this statement incorrect.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><>

by staylost on Nov 9, 2009 12:50 PM PST reply actions

I don't know how Rosen can criticize Blake's defense

Blake’s defense literally crippled Tony Parker, without even causing a foul.

Still on the Rex bandwagon.

by dan_the_man on Nov 9, 2009 1:10 PM PST reply actions

Steve Blake with the Dim Mak

"Its not that I can't read and write, its just that I don't like to read and write."
-Charlie

by ninjasocks on Nov 9, 2009 3:55 PM PST up reply actions

Not sure why everyone is so up in arms....

To me it sounded like a pretty fair and accurate description of how the individual Blazers performed against San Antonio. Hi wasn’t being too hard on anyone and any criticism was IMO warranted.

It always gets me how people on this site can be so hard on the team and the players, but as soon as an outsider like Rosen says anything the least bit critical, we cry foul and assume he is being unfair and biased. It must some type of small market mentality thing.

by socalblazer on Nov 9, 2009 2:02 PM PST reply actions

my Rosen rant wasn't based on this post, but rather his body of work.

by jksnake99 on Nov 9, 2009 2:12 PM PST up reply actions

I hear that Brandon Roy is a bust.

by Timmay! on Nov 9, 2009 5:51 PM PST up reply actions

Clicking on his articles results in more support for the guy.

He writes, almost always, low quality fluff.

This article may be good, but I get decent evaluation on this site without having to read Charlie “Brandon Roy is a Bust, wait I never said that!” Rosen.

*Unless KP has a secret plan that makes this statement incorrect.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><>

by staylost on Nov 9, 2009 2:28 PM PST up reply actions

lol his 'article' is horrible

Wow LMA is passive sometimes. Thanks for the insight Chuck. Imagine what he would’ve thought if the Blazers hand’t dominated SA for 3 and a half quarters. /yawn

Blazer Fan

by leeroyjenkins on Nov 10, 2009 7:54 AM PST up reply actions