Bipolar Reaction.
Hence the handle.
Before you guys flame me, let me begin by saying that I always stick by my team whether or not I'm a believer. They're the only team for which I consider myself a true fan. I caught every televised game and listened to them the other ones on the radio when Sebastian Telfair and Serge Monia were starting. I usually just find another team to root for as a secondary option, whether it's because I like the city or the style and roster, in addition to the Blazers because I like watching good NBA basketball.
I'm not a believer at this point. Right now, a couple games in, the Blazers have been exposed as a bona fide bad team.
It starts with defense and the lack of an inside presence. Their perimeter players can't stop penetration consistently, with the exception of Roy when he's not overburdened on offense. (Losing Batum took a lot away from their effectiveness). This gets Pryz and Oden in foul trouble, keeping two stellar defensive players off the floor for significant stretches. For his part, Oden doesn't do himself any favors by challenging shots he should let go and setting moving picks. The refs do their part by calling ticky-tack nonsense like incidental contact struggling for loose balls and BS push-offs. Their team defense is bad because they miss rotations entirely too often.
Getting deep position and taking it to his man in the post just isn't in LMA's constitution. He's often catching the ball 15+ feet from the basket; that doesn't really count as posting up in my book. He can hit jumpshots form 20 feet out and in and run the floor (under-utilized with current personnel), but those are his only true offensive strengths. He can't rebound.
Oden can be a factor offensively through his rebounding and picks, but that entails staying on the floor. Though BEdgers have been calling for Oden to get more touches, it does no good if he's just going to get nipped, travel, brick a hook shot, or commit an offensive foul the majority of the time. He's too prone to bobbling the ball to be catch the ball in the paint on the pick and roll.
Lacking big men who can take it inside consistently, they are basically left with one player who can score in the paint. Andre Miller may be able to do so when he gets his sea legs, but no option is reliable with the exception of Roy. Miller presents other problems in that he can't spread the floor, creating a cluster____ in the middle. Martell also has the potential to get into the paint moving off the ball, but he doesn't have the handles to be trusted dribbling in traffic. Travis Outlaw has been trying to get to the cup more; it's not working. If he passes up the usual hotly-contested jump shot and gets a step, he ends up taking a shot that is arguably more difficult. He'll get to the paint, try to shoot over defenders while off-balance or fading, and get no call because he's not initiating contact and putting the onus on the refs. Aside from catching the occasional lob on the baseline, Rudy basically shoots floaters when he's less than ten feet from the hoop.
The rest of the roster is chock full of jumpshooters. Good ones, but jumpshooters nonetheless. If that's what you're going to get offensively from perimeter players, you might as well have someone like Raja Bell, a guy who will get in his man's grill and frustrate him defensively.
If they choose to trade LMA for a legit post-up threat, I can't see who it would be. Maybe someone like David West or Elton Brand, provided his game is up to par after his injuries. Other than that, who else would be desirable and/or feasible to obtain? The same goes for SFs.
PGs? Chris Paul ain't gonna happen. For those who think otherwise: how much money you got?
As much as I've defended Nate in the past, I'm starting to question his substitution patterns. Not that it matters, however. You can only play with the hand that you're dealt.
Unfortunately, I see this team getting a 6th seed at best and getting the quick hook in the first round, even if they improve significantly. Again, I'll still stick with them and catch every game, but the Blazers won't have a serious shot at the trophy for the foreseeable future. We'll be listening to guys like Marv Albert giving the Lakers, Celtics, Cavs, or Spurs the proverbial reach-around this year.
The draft appears to be the only way to build upon the roster. This off-season was definitely forgettable in that regard. They picked up two tweeners, a guy they'll have to stash for a couple years, and another who may never see a minute of floor time in the NBA.
What a letdown. I've been haunted by Game 7 for almost 10 years and I so badly want my team to be good. Hopefully, I'll wake up a month or two from now and realize how FOS I was. Barring that, additional mood stabilizers may be necessary.
0 recs |
8 comments
| Add comment
Comments
LMA got 12 rebounds last night
It is ridiculous to say he “cannot” rebound. He also averaged what, seven or eight a game last season? Not quite what we want, but considering we’re generally an awesome rebounding team he doesn’t need to get that extra one or two a game.
by Seven06Renault on Nov 4, 2009 2:13 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Fair enough.
It’s a bit of an overstatement, but they are a much weaker rebounding team without Pryz or Oden on the floor. His rebounding numbers haven’t been anything to write home about this year: 7 was his best effort aside from that game, though the OKC game shouldn’t count in that assessment.
by Benjamanic on Nov 4, 2009 2:22 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
20pts - 14 boards, I believe.
"I don't always read blogs regarding the Trail Blazers
...but when I do... I read Blazers Edge."
- resurrect_ha28
by FiveOhThree-RipCity!! on Nov 4, 2009 3:10 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
You talked about what you perceive to be going on now,
yet you talk about the problems in a manner that indicates that the players are not so good as we thought they were? Are you sure it is the players, or is it how they are being coached up?
I would like to ask a few defensively oriented questions:
.
*Do you think Brandon can play average to above average defense with a change in effort and mindset? (I say yes.)
.
*Do you think that LMA can play better defense with a change in effort and mindset? (I say yes.)
.
*Do you think GO has the ability to become a dominant, game changing, defender this year? (I say yes and stand behind him on the foul issue, don’t keep taking him out before it is time because of fouls, that is what Joel is for—right now Nate seems to be agreeing with the refs (rather than taking Oden’s side) on many of those ticky-tacky fouls.)
.
*Do you think Jerryd could possibly help us on defense this year? (I do and I do not care about him fouling out or making a few mistakes—we need his defensive strength, speed, and quickness on the floor.)
.
*Do you think that Andre Miller has been giving it 100% effort on defense this year? (I say about 65% and I do not think he is alone with that sort of percentage.)
.
*Do you think that DC deserves to get a chance to show what he can do on the defensive end (I would have loved to see him given a chance on Mello the other night—Villanova played some tough man to man defense and his body type matches up better with Mello and the like.)
.
*Do you believe that Joel is a pretty good defender? (I say yes, but he cannot be left to hold down the basket area alone.)
.
*Do you feel that defense should truly be made a pivotal point when it comes to playing time? (I do not think there has been enough emphasis on it, I.e. play D now, or come out of the game—D not O as the hook!)
.
*Under a defensive system of accountability, do you feel like the rest of the roster is good enough to hold their own for the most part as long as they are given help? (I do, even Channing is surviving in Phoenix.)
.
*Do you think our defensive game plans are anywhere close to as good as the Celtics game plans? (I certainly do not!)
The best players only try to, "do it all," themselves when it is a playoff necessity or, on occasion, to put on a show. Other than that, the game is easy for them, and they are just having fun and getting a workout in. There is no need to belabor the point!
by KINGofMACct on Nov 4, 2009 2:54 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Responses.
Roy? I think his defensive effort is inversely related to his minutes and shots taken. I’ve seen him play great D and make critical stops, but the beating he takes when going to the hole subtracts from his defensive game.
LMA? A good indicator of a player’s effort on defense is the amount of charges he takes or attempts to take, in my opinion. I see Joel Przybilla taking charges despite the fact that he’s taken a lot of pain for doing so, to put it mildly. I rarely see LMA give up his body and I can’t recall many times when his man got frustrated to the point of taking cheap shots. He’s a little like Sergio was in that respect—I’ve never seen that guy take a charge—but not as bad. LMA has length. He can get blocks and deflections, but I haven’t seen as much heart as I’d like. He’s being coached by a guy who preaches defense (whether or not he’s the best teacher or strategist). Someone should send Nate a thesaurus so he can pick out some synonyms for ‘scrappy’. So I don’t know, but I’m leaning toward “no”.
Oden? Absolutely. He already is whenever he’s on the floor. I think Nate should get more vocal and probably get tossed out of a couple for the nonsense they’re calling on their bigs.
Bayless? I’d love to see him get some time against quick guards like Brooks or Tony Parker, especially if Blake goes cold. Bayless is an aggressive defender who buys into the notion of playing tough D. He handchecks too much and gets too aggressive, but the effort is there. Couldn’t hurt to give it a shot.
Miller? Sometimes I think he’s putting out a decent effort but he seems to have lost a step. He definitely has some veteran tricks up his sleeve. If he is giving 65% effort while grumbling about being a bench guy, I wouldn’t be heartbroken to see him shipped.
Cunningham? Monty Williams said his main liability as a 3 is that he doesn’t defend quick guys on the perimeter well. It wouldn’t hurt his psyche to put him in a game for his first NBA minutes, but I don’t think he could do a better job on Carmelo than Roy and Webster did. Melo was hitting contested outside shots and beating his man off the dribble. Batum might have been good for a couple more misses.
Joel? He’s an excellent defender. He’s their goalie, and he knows that’s why he’s got a well-paying job. I agree. He doesn’t get enough help.
Defense as central to the question of minutes? I think it is to a point. Martell got the yank early and played only 14 minutes against Houston because of his defense. Somebody has to score though, so they sometimes have to keep Travis in when he’s hitting shots but playing suspect D, for example.
Help? San Antonio is a good defensive team and I’ve heard commentators argue that not many of the Spurs are great defenders as individuals—they’re good because they give help effectively.
The game plan question? No. But it’s easier to execute a defensive game plan when you have guys like KG, Perkins, and Rajon Rondo.
by Benjamanic on Nov 4, 2009 4:51 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Negative Nancy.
Prozac helps.
"I don't always read blogs regarding the Trail Blazers
...but when I do... I read Blazers Edge."
- resurrect_ha28
by FiveOhThree-RipCity!! on Nov 4, 2009 3:50 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
first this post
next thing you know your getting pulled over on your bike strapped with 5 pistols, a sawed off shotgun, and a bowie knife.
Delonte West: Zombie Hunter
by In Walks Rudy on Nov 4, 2009 7:35 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Someday a real rain...
will come and wash all the scum off the street.
You talkin’ to me?
by Benjamanic on Nov 5, 2009 7:37 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs

by 
























