Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Jerry Sandusky's Wife Tries To Run A Reporter Over

The Numbers Don't Lie: Our Problem is Offense, Not Defense

The Blazers are clearly struggling right now, but I'm a little surprised by all of the focus on their defensive effort.  Sure, there are plenty of ways in which the Blazers could improve on the defensive end, but they've actually been playing defense noticeably better this year.  The problem is that their offensive effeciency has plummeted. 

Last year the Blazers led the league in offensive effeciency, getting an impressive 113.9 points per 100 possessions.  They were 13th in defensive efficiency, allowing 107.8 points per 100 possessions.  Over the first five games of this season, the Blazers have improved on defense, allowing just 105.3 points per 100 possessions.  And that's against a group of teams that are all higher than average offensively.  That level of defensive effeciency would have been fifth best in the league last year (by the way, the Blazers are playing at an 88.5 pace this year, still very slow but slightly higher than the 86.6 pace they played at last year). 

The problem is that we've been decidedly mediocre on offense so far, scoring just 106.5 points per 100 possessions (13th in the league).  With even a marginally better offensive output, the Blazers might well be 5-0. 

So what's the problem?  Well, let's start with what the problem isn't.  It's not 3-point shooting.  The Blazers are averaging 7 made threes on 20 attempts per game this year.  Last year they averaged 7 made threes on 19 attempts.  The problem isn't foul shooting either.  The Blazers are averaging 22 made foul shots per game this year as opposed to 18.5 last year (thanks in part to an impressive 81.5% conversion rate--up from 75% last year). 

The problem is 2 point scoring. Last year the Blazers made 49% of their 2 point shots.  This year they're making just under 45%.  That's an indication that they're not getting as many easy shots. 

The good news, I suppose, is that the difference isn't stark.  The Blazers are scoring approximately 4 fewer 2-point buckets per night this year than last year (a difference they are partially compensating for by getting more points at the foul line).  Improving by three or four buckets a night is very doable.  Indeed, even a marginal improvement in the Blazers' non-exisitent transition game might be enough to do the trick.  I'd also like to see a lot more backdoor and baseline cuts for alley-oops, something we saw routinely last year but have seen very little of this year.  With Andre Miller on the team, our wings (Fernandez, Roy, Outlaw, Webster) should be looking to cut baseline to the hoop for alley-oops.  Miller is one of the best lob passers in the league, and he hasn't had a chance to use that particular skill set yet. 

Finally, and this is slightly off-topic, but I'd like to see Nate McMillan stop treating fouls like they are rollover minutes.  You don't get to keep unused fouls for future games and fouling out is not the end of the world.  There's no point keeping key players (*cough* Oden *cough*) on the bench for long stretches of the game only to have them finish with only 4 or 5 fouls.  Let the man play.  Taking him out the second he picks up a foul messes with his head, keeps both him and the team from finding a rhythm, and telegraphs to the refs that you don't trust him to play under control.  Last night we got murdered in the 4th quarter when Nate went small against a big, aggressive Atlanta lineup.  Aldridge was playing the 5 as if he thought Greg or Joel were still in the game, often leaving the key to guard people out by the 3 point line.  The guy is a great player, but he can't play the 5 defensively.  You can only put him in that position when the other team doesn't have any decent post players in the game. 

Anyway, I've rambled on long enough.  The bottom line is that the Blazers need to start focusing more on their offense and less on their defense.  It's the offensive that's costing them games. 

But for some perspective, the Blazers also began last season going 2-3.  And their two wins were a 100-99 squeaker against San Antonio (at home) and 101-99 win over Houston on Roy's miracle shot. 

Comment 45 comments  |  11 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Great points

A more efficient offense would help our defense, too.

Right now we have way too many turn overs and ugly shots that are leading to easy scoring opportunities on the other end.

I feel like chemistry, or really a lack there of, is the cause of much of our offensive woes. Our guys are clearly unsettled by the frequency, length, and variance of their rotations and playing time. It’s hard for shooters to get in a rhythm in such conditions. And the units haven’t gelled yet. So guys are forcing individual efforts rather than playing within the flow of the team’s schemes.

I just wonder what the solution is? Is it just a matter of time? Do we need a tighter rotation with better defined roles? An attitude adjustment? It’s really hard to say.

by DC Blazer on Nov 4, 2009 10:13 AM PST reply actions   1 recs

I think tighter rotation is the key.

As I said below. Chemistry (in the larger sense) shouldn’t be a problem for this team. Rhythm is the problem, I think.

by fitsnstarts on Nov 4, 2009 10:55 AM PST up reply actions  

Best part of the post speaks to it

Fouls do not roll over. We can not save them. If Oden fouls out at the start of the fourth, so be it. If he was in rythem and got 20 minutes he may already have 12 points, 13 boards, and 3 blocks. He can rest for the next game while pryz finishes, or also fouls out. It feels like more fouls are being called in the post this year. LMA is a great player, but he is a PF and under no circumstance is he a C. To me, the lack of rythem for our post players seems like the big issue.

by lurtsman on Nov 4, 2009 12:57 PM PST up reply actions  

What good is it to take Oden out. Nate's the one that needs to trust him more, who's to say he could not play the

rest of the game with the fouls he has left. It just helps the other team. Only change at normal times.

by prof.mike on Nov 4, 2009 2:24 PM PST up reply actions  

You are right about turnovers...

I know it is just 5 games in but we are averaging 14.4 per game this year compared to 12.1 last year. I know it is only 2+ per game but those lead to points for the other team. The majority of those are coming from Oden. IF he turned some of those TO’s into points we may won some of those close games….just sayin’

Good stuff BTW!

"Do me a favor. Put your lip over your head... and swallow." Max Goldman

by clinchmobb on Nov 4, 2009 11:31 AM PST up reply actions  

but...

we shouldn’t have been close…

"Fernandez, to my eyes, is the Blazer who walks that walk most comfortably. A lot of Portland's fans (egged on, dare I say, by their local broadcasters) lament things like how Ron Artest or Yao Ming get to hit Brandon Roy's arms.

But I suspect Fernandez sees all that and thinks: We get to hit arms! Cool!"

http://myespn.go.com/blogs/truehoop/0-39-135/On-Playoff-Experience.html

"I told Pau the Lakers never win here in Portland; I think it's great." -- Rudy Fernandez

by ratbastird on Nov 4, 2009 12:51 PM PST up reply actions  

I want every game to be a 40+ point blow out for us but...

we seem to have a tendency to play to the level of the competition. Last year, we played (and won) a lot of close ones. So far this year, not so much…

"Do me a favor. Put your lip over your head... and swallow." Max Goldman

by clinchmobb on Nov 4, 2009 12:55 PM PST up reply actions  

Any clue about when Oden gets stripped

He seems to be doing a fine post move, and then is in the air with all limbs spread wide out. I’m not sure how this happens. He is generally the strongest man on the floor, and should be holding the ball firmly, and then his arms are outstretched to opposite sides… I’m a huge Oden fan, and I’ve seen this happen to many NBA big men, but none so frequently.

by lurtsman on Nov 4, 2009 1:05 PM PST up reply actions  

every time Oden gets the ball in the post

teams are sending a help man to come around behind him and try to poke the ball out. Opposing coaching staffs have clearly been watching the video and can see that Oden is vulnerable in that situation. The only way they’re going to stop doing this is if Oden burns them on it a few times by quickly passing the ball to the guy whose man left him to come try to steal the ball. If Greg can make that pass a few times, other teams will stop trying to do this.

www.blazerguy.com

by Blazer Guy on Nov 4, 2009 1:09 PM PST up reply actions  

I disagree...

He loses it most of the time in one-on-one coverage. It is not a second man knocking it out. It is his man knocking it out as he makes the move.

"Do me a favor. Put your lip over your head... and swallow." Max Goldman

by clinchmobb on Nov 4, 2009 2:48 PM PST up reply actions  

yes

Sometimes the defensive player will be behind him and creep around to tap the ball out. The frustrating part is that if Greg had a bit more of a feel for the post, he’d be able to grab the ball strong with both hands and take it to the hoop with the defender totally out of position.

by atomiccafe on Nov 4, 2009 3:48 PM PST up reply actions  

Oden brings the ball down too low, too often

Watch a post with great fundamentals, like Tim Duncan. He holds the ball much higher unless he’s actually dribbling. When Oden winds up for his move, he has a tendency to hunch down low, and when he does, he’s vulnerable to being stripped.

by DC Blazer on Nov 4, 2009 1:37 PM PST up reply actions  

yes indeed!

He is always got it low. Aldridge does a much better job of keeping it high.

"Do me a favor. Put your lip over your head... and swallow." Max Goldman

by clinchmobb on Nov 4, 2009 2:47 PM PST up reply actions  

Rec

…and the culprit here seems to be bizarre rotations. Rhythm is worth a lot, and subbing after every foul and playing with rotations seems to be throwing that rhythm way out of wack.

by fitsnstarts on Nov 4, 2009 10:53 AM PST reply actions  

I like your posts

because you move away some from the obvious and you have some good supported points…(it always generates good debate).
     I do think that it cannot be pinpointed to just an offense issue ……..if your talking about easy hoops, most of these are not generated out of a set offense….Most will come from good defense and transition from defense to offense…..getting the defense on their heels, so to speak, is what generates most easy hoops…..
    the offensive set is too predictable and teams adjust and shut them down, thus making them work harder to get points…..having to rely on a set offense based on outside shooting, no penetration, and Roy and LMA one on ones, puts a high demand on some players and makes the rest of the team spectators…..it truly negates the unit as a team….usually what brings them together is good defense

by WyEast on Nov 4, 2009 11:05 AM PST reply actions  

Excellent points:

Taking him out the second he picks up a foul messes with his head, keeps both him and the team from finding a rhythm, and telegraphs to the refs that you don’t trust him to play under control.

Plus it allows the opposition to attack Greg with the knowledge that often 1 additional foul will pull him from play. If it isn’t so predictable when he will come out, opposing teams may not repeatedly redirect their offense to go directly at Greg, as that may not be their best offensive strategy over repeated possessions.

by shralpster on Nov 4, 2009 11:06 AM PST reply actions  

Game theory suggests

the easiest way to control an interaction between two people is to add a third person whose behavior is known. Police do this by bringing dogs. Both the officer, and the criminal, know the dog will respond to a fight by biting. That knowledge frequently prevents the situation from occurring. If McMil had a similiar philosophy of “I will not pull Oden because of fouls in the first half unless he has at least 3, and will not pull him in the second half because of fouls” it may lead teams to attack Oden less, and it would give Oden more confidence that his coach believed in him to make good decisions and help the team win.

by lurtsman on Nov 4, 2009 1:01 PM PST up reply actions  

great game theoretic insight

the psychology of the participants is very important

by jukelike20 on Nov 4, 2009 1:30 PM PST up reply actions  

We haven't played any upper echelon teams yet

Houston, Denver, OKC?

Houston is a fluke, Denver has one scorer on their roster and OKC is probably a lottery team.

Just something to consider.

Blazer Fan

by leeroyjenkins on Nov 4, 2009 11:07 AM PST reply actions  

I disagree

If you look at the team numbers so far this season, Denver has played about as well as anyone but Boston. And Houston’s looked good too. They only have one loss (to us) and they crushed Utah at Utah. And OKC only has 2 losses: one to us and one to the Lakers in overtime last night. Atlanta’s teams stats (especially on offense) are also quite good so far. So the teams we’ve played so far have been playing pretty well. They’re all in the top half of the league so far.

www.blazerguy.com

by Blazer Guy on Nov 4, 2009 11:14 AM PST up reply actions  

I would argue that a better defense

would lead to a better offense. Pretty tough to be efficient on offense when you are constantly battling a fully set defense. Defensive stops and even gambles at times lead to easy buckets which would make that efficiency number look a ton better.

by kellex-BoL on Nov 4, 2009 11:20 AM PST reply actions  

Mostly correct, but...

Except for defensive specialists, NBA players play tough D when they’ve got their groove going on the offensive end. The more they struggle to get easy or good looks, the more they suck on D.

 

by ralphzillo on Nov 4, 2009 11:52 AM PST up reply actions  

I partly agree...and lots of good analysis

The offense has been a problem. You have to expect that with a new pg and 3.

However, I think its too early to declare our D “not a problem”. We have too many guys who don’t consistently defend. The effort from some guys has been better at times, but as constructed, this team will be prone to poor D.

by JMoon on Nov 4, 2009 11:52 AM PST reply actions  

Don't get me wrong

I’m not saying there isn’t a ton of room to improve on defense. My point is that we did well last year because we had an extraordinarily efficient offense and an average defense. This year (so far) our offense is average and our defense is slightly improved. It’s the offense that has declined, not the defense.

www.blazerguy.com

by Blazer Guy on Nov 4, 2009 12:12 PM PST up reply actions  

We lack speed and athleticism from our starting point guard.

1) It would be nice if we had a point guard that could break down the defenses of other teams and get to the hoop, drawing the opposing team’s forwards and centers to them, while they dish off for some easy assists. That is non-existant in Steve Blake. Andre Miller is not as athletic as he used to be either. It is hard for Bayless to blow by anyone when he is sitting on the bench.

If we had a point guard who could get by the perimeter defense, maybe opposing big men would actually get in foul trouble for once, and the rythem of other teams would be thrown off. Then we would have a huge advantage.

2)

Can I buy you a fish sandwich?

by silkybrown on Nov 4, 2009 12:56 PM PST reply actions  

Oh yeah

Nevermind my second point. :)

Can I buy you a fish sandwich?

by silkybrown on Nov 4, 2009 12:58 PM PST up reply actions  

1) is a great idea, but ultimately a waste because our rigid offensive sets call for the point guard to get very little opportunity to break the defense down off the dribble. The point guards job is to pass the ball to Roy and stand and wait for the ball at the corner 3 point line.

We brought in a point guard who has a proven track record of being able to get into the lane and finish or dish (lob pass anyone?), and who is very effective at running pick and rolls with big men. However, we give him only a few chances per game to do either. Instead we tell him to go be Steve Blake 2.0

How did you guys win that?
"We scored enough points. We scored 107, they scored 105.
-Nate McMillan Postgame, 3/4/2009

by douglast on Nov 4, 2009 1:20 PM PST up reply actions  

So far you are right-- the O's been real bad. Let's wait 20 games or so before we declare that D is no longer our biggest problem.

Last year, our D was clearly worse than our O. This year, we’ve been mediocre both ways. In this few games, luck plays a big factor though. We need a bigger sample size.

by jksnake99 on Nov 4, 2009 12:57 PM PST reply actions  

Dang, that's just what I was about to say.

The sample size is just too small. I think It’s likely that our "improved" defense so far, at least statistically, is the result of the opposing teams not playing their best offensively due to other factors (e.g. Denver playing Portland on a back-to-back and following a blizzard delay at the airport, Durant having a freak horrible shooting night, etc.).

by MDBlazerfan on Nov 4, 2009 12:59 PM PST up reply actions  

Completely agree

My point wasn’t that we’ve clearly improved defensively. I don’t think that’s clear at all. But it’s not the defense that has been losing these games. We haven’t played any worse defensively than we played last year. But we have played worse on the offensive end. We obviously need to improve on both ends of the court to be an elite team, but what’s concerning me the most right now is our drop off in offensive play.

www.blazerguy.com

by Blazer Guy on Nov 4, 2009 1:04 PM PST up reply actions  

I will contend

that our offense was bound to regress if we were planning on playing the same style of offense we did last year – which we clearly are. We performed that offense over and above what could normally be expected due to incredible offensive rebounding and individual one on one ability. But this is not the recipe for deep playoff success, nor long term regular season success either. I think we are one of the easiest teams in the league to defend. Sure, there are times when Roy gets into unstoppable mode, or Travis or Rudy or Martell or Steve starting going on hot shooting streaks, but this isn’t something you can bank on night in and night out. Teams are figuring out how easy it is to slow our offense down, and how to send a 2nd guy at Roy on the 4th quarter isolation and turn our offense into utter garbage. We have NO team offense to speak of, just a series of one on one playcalls that we swing between.

How did you guys win that?
"We scored enough points. We scored 107, they scored 105.
-Nate McMillan Postgame, 3/4/2009

by douglast on Nov 4, 2009 1:25 PM PST up reply actions  

Agreed

I spend far too much time imagining what a good offensive coach like Rick Adelman could do with our assembled talent. My hunch is that the team would be utterly dominant.

www.blazerguy.com

by Blazer Guy on Nov 4, 2009 1:32 PM PST up reply actions  

at the very least a lot more fun to watch.

But let’s look at the reality here – this team is never going to be a dominant defense IMHO. Our players just aren’t individually talented defenders (with a few exceptions). Thus, we need to play to our strenghts – which is the individual talents we DO have at the offensive end. Roy, Aldridge, Webster, Outlaw, Rudy, Andre, Bayless are all very talented offensive players. Greg isn’t to that point, but he can create matchup issues. If we implemented and offensive scheme that generated a lot more points, we would put the pressure on teams to try and keep up with us on that end. It’s frustrating to see another team go on a 1 for 9 stretch and yet still only be 6 points down because we aren’t scoring either.

I’m not saying I want to run the D’Antoni system here, but we could generate a lot more points, and thus take pressure off of our defense, if we A) ran more (and really meant it, not just say it), and B) put in a system that emphasises a lot more player movement and a lot less isolation or 1 on 1 plays.

How did you guys win that?
"We scored enough points. We scored 107, they scored 105.
-Nate McMillan Postgame, 3/4/2009

by douglast on Nov 4, 2009 1:55 PM PST up reply actions  

sadly, I agree

I spend far too much time imagining what a good offensive coach like Rick Adelman could do with our assembled talent. My hunch is that the team would be utterly dominant.

www.blazerguy.com

by Blazer Guy on Nov 4, 2009 1:32 PM PST reply actions  

You might be right...

But I get the strong feeling the Blazers aren’t executing the offense Nate wants them too. I’m not sure we can really evaluate McMillan’s coaching based on the team’s poor execution.

At some point, we can blame him for not getting the team to do his bidding, but it’s a bit early for that at this stage.

by DC Blazer on Nov 4, 2009 1:43 PM PST up reply actions  

it doesn't appear like an execution problem to me

it appears like a planning and playcalling problem. If the play call is 3 guys stand around, one guy sets a pick above the 3 point line, and then Roy drives to the hoop to dry and call a foul – that’s not a lack of execution if it doesn’t work, it’s just an easy play to defend.

To me, when I watch other teams play, they pretty much all seem to do a much better job of creating player movement that results in guys cutting to the basket and getting the ball on that cut, which they then convert into a high percentage inside opportunity, or a dumpoff to another player. We NEVER hit anyone cutting to the basket. literally never. and it’s not just this year – we haven’t done that at all over the past several years. At some point you have to look at is as by design. We don’t send cutters to the basket. That’s not how we draw up plays. We don’t want cutters, we clearly want guys standing 24 feet away waiting for the ball to be kicked out and rotated.

How did you guys win that?
"We scored enough points. We scored 107, they scored 105.
-Nate McMillan Postgame, 3/4/2009

by douglast on Nov 4, 2009 1:49 PM PST up reply actions  

Rec'd for this line.
I’d like to see Nate McMillan stop treating fouls like they are rollover minutes.

"We believe" -Rudy Fernandez

by twiggs on Nov 4, 2009 2:04 PM PST reply actions   1 recs

Aldridge was playing the 5 as if he thought Greg or Joel were still in the game, often leaving the key to guard people out by the 3 point line. The guy is a great player, but he can’t play the 5 defensively.

Last year Frye played the 5 when Greg/Joel were out. LMA may look like a center, but he defends and rebounds like a SF. (Which is why I’ve been advocating dealing Outlaw for a backup 4/5, for awhile…)

When reached 40 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!

by two4larue on Nov 4, 2009 6:45 PM PST reply actions  

Great post

Its the offense. I get frustrated when Nate and everyone talks about defensive effort after a loss like last night. The defense and effort are acceptable. The offensive scheme/execution are not.

by goblazer1 on Nov 4, 2009 7:21 PM PST via mobile reply actions  

you stole it right out of my mouth

i was just thinking the same thing, then i got on to blazersedge and i see this post you beat me to it. Our offense blows they keep talking defense but forget about offense you cant win if you dont score.

Any idiot can face a crisis - it's day to day living that wears you out.

I have a simple philosophy: Fill what's empty. Empty what's full. Scratch where it itches.

by Nad on Nov 4, 2009 9:55 PM PST reply actions  

Best fanpost this month

"HA HA HA HA HA
I'm not laughing, I'm just listing the five ugliest Blazers ever."
- rockingharder

by jamon51 on Nov 5, 2009 12:08 AM PST reply actions  

Portland might want to try

some variation of the triangle to change things up. The pick and roll tends to clog up the middle, especially when the pick and roll breaks down and the team starts an iso play the opponent bigs are now at the basket area.

by 7677maniac on Nov 5, 2009 10:11 AM PST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

The ultimate coverage and analysis of the Portland Trail Blazers.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
The Blazers Future Regarding Free Agent Signings
Small
Thunderous Manboobies
Img_0878_1__small
Why do we hate LaMarcus Aldridge?
Small
Oregonlive "journalists" 2 new posts...same old drivel
2474796688_7cdc78828f_o_small
Greg Oden Suffers Life-Ending Injury; Gets 3-Year Extension

Recent FanPosts

Small
The Blazers' Future Regarding Trades
Small
WHAT TO DO WITH NIC BATUM BECAUSE WE WILL LOSE HIM IF NOT TRADED.
Small
Trade that helps us out now and the future
Small
How can the All-Star game be more fun and competitive?
Small
Earl Boykins!
Small
LaMarcus Aldridge about to become the 10th highest scorer in Blazers franchise  history
Small
New trade that gets us a new point and a three point shooter
Small
Portland getting.....
Small
The Sun Behind the Clouds: Blazers still on track.

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

FanShots

Quick hits of video, photos, quotes, chats, links and lists that you find around the web.

Recommended FanShots

It's pretty clear that the season is over already ;)
Double rainbow of sadness:

1) JBay is getting shorter
2) We never got to see him with a mustache

I miss you tiny raptor man.

via The Basketball Jones http://blogs.thescore.com/tbj/2012/02/09/things-of-note-for-february-9-2012/#more-34561
Blazers Broadcasters Mike Barrett and Mike Rice re-enacted NBA referee Scott Foster's controversial goaltending call on Portland Trail Blazers forward LaMarcus Aldridge, who was defending Oklahoma City Thunder All-Star forward Kevin Durant, during this week's edition of Blazers Courtside. Remarkably, no one was injured during the taping of this segment.

Original video of the play here. 
Quotes from the players and coaches here. 
The NBA admitting it got the call wrong here. 
Dave's  extended thoughts here. 
BlazersMakr's FanShot: Major Vegas action on OKC prior to tip here. 
Audio of Chad Doing of 750 AM The Game going HAM on Foster here.

OK, that should just about wrap up the goaltending discussion.

Courtside video via Blazers Broadcasting cameraman John Curry.

-- Ben Golliver | benjamin.golliver@gmail.com | Twitter
In 2008 Tim Donaghy indicated that Scott Foster was a ref that also fixed games
Blazers Owner Paul Allen Ranked No. 3 American Philanthropist In 2011

Recent FanShots

"You Must Be Known For Your Defense, Because You Definitely Stole My Heart"
Bill Simmons: Deron Williams To Dallas 'Is A Lock'
LaMarcus Aldridge Needs Support Around Him
LaMarcus Aldridge Finds Out He's An All-Star With His Teammates
Congratulations to Portland Trail Blazers forward LaMarcus Aldridge, on his first All Star selection.

As seen on www.trailblazers.com
AWoj: Aldridge an All Star
CRAZY stat from Houston game
NBA MVP Rankings... LMA @ #10

+ New FanShot All FanShots >


Editors

Kitten_small Dave

Headshotsmall_small Ben Golliver

Lead Moderators

Getfuzzy-satchel_small Timmay!

Bucky3_small Cablinasian

Authors

Plainlc_small Storyteller

Moderators

Lamb_small T Darkstar

Small douglast

Terryporter_small prezofdeath

Small usmcr3049

Lrg_magpie_small Corvid

Wallpaper_small geoffm