(Poll) Whose More Improved?

but who has the bigger impact on a game?

So I assume Oden getting better has a more immediate impact overall.

I still believe Oden is better. Hibberts raw numbers have grown primarily from just being on the floor longer. His points/36 minutes have dropped, although his rebounding has improved.

Hibbert has reeeeally reduced his foul rate which has kept him on the floor for more than 14 minutes a game.

Small sample size. Get back to us at the all-star break.

Channing Frye WILL NOT win MIP. I think most people understand that the only reason he is so successful is because he fits very well into the Pheonix Sun’s system. You take away Nash, and his role as a stand around shooter and you have the same crappy Channing Frye that we let go of.

Sometimes you gotta be wrong so the other guy can be right.

But I say Greg, hands down.

I’m a newbie at this stuff. But I pretty much figured that minutes would be the main thing I was missing. That and it being so early in the season. Still though, its fun to see what people think, even early on.

As for the word (or lack there of) “whose” it is a word. I assure you. I may not have used it correctly but here are just a few of its definitions.

–pronoun
1. (the possessive case of who used as an adjective): Whose umbrella did I take? Whose is this one?
2. (the possessive case of which used as an adjective): a word whose meaning escapes me; an animal whose fur changes color.
3. the one or ones belonging to what person or persons: Whose painting won the third prize?
Origin:
bef. 900; ME whos, early ME hwās; r. hwas, OE hwæs, gen. of hwā who

Usage note:
Sometimes the phrase of which is used as the possessive of which: Chicago is a city of which the attractions are many or Chicago is a city the attractions of which are many. The use of this phrase can often seem awkward or pretentious, whereas whose sounds more idiomatic: Chicago is a city whose attractions are many.

Source:

http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/whose