Another great Chad Ford quote - confirming the previous Oden vs. Bynum Post
Lance (Pdx )
Which young NBA big man would you rather have? Bynum or OdenChad Ford (1:40 PM)
Oden. But that's not a knock on Bynum. He's been great this year.
about 2 years ago
rip_city_swagger
23 comments
2 recs |
Comments
Oden is intimidating
Bynum is not
Blazer Fan
by leeroyjenkins on Nov 24, 2009 10:52 AM PST reply actions 1 recs
I disagree
Oden may be more of a defensive presence, but Bynum has really improved his D and shot blocking (1.9 a game to date). I take Bynum now and Oden long term as I think Oden rebounds better.
What are you impressions of Roy?
"He's just a very, very good basketball player. Very smart. Very heady. He can do a little bit of everything on the court. As coaches, when we scout Portland we kind of put him in the same category as Kobe (Bryant), LeBron (James), Dwyane Wade. We treat him the same. He's that good."
- Byron Scott
They're both young guys that haven't hit their peaks...
Bynum is going to be a 20+ and 10 guy, but not a fearsome defensive force. He’ll be able to stay on the floor 40 minutes in a pinch.
Oden is going to be a 13 and 13 sort of guy, intimidating on D but not as smooth on the offensive end, getting his numbers in shorter time of play. He will always be in greater foul trouble due to his defensive orientation and his more physical style of play will additionally make really long stretches of play unlikely. So you’ll always need a true backup C with Oden, I think.
Myself — so far it looks like Bynum is the preferred choice, but I have to say the last couple games there seems to have been some sort of light bulb that clicked on in Greg’s head… So that could change.
"A bizarre and extremely rare hybrid Blazer/Laker fan, Timbo has always struggled to contain the Beast Within, like Dr. Jekyll, Bruce Banner, or Ted Kennedy." — Miled Animal
I was thinking this same thing the other day
then I went and looked at the two players career stats, and they are pretty similar, Bynum has been in the league longer by 3 years, and is far more polished at the offensive end, but I don’t see any reason why Greg couldn’t get to that ability in 3 years time as well. For this year I agree with Hollinger, Greg is aspiring to be avg, but in the future if Nate can change the Blazers offensive system to feature Greg along with Roy and LMA, then I feel Greg could avg 18+ ppg.
Ben II Blazersedge.com || New to Blazers' Edge?
I agree with most of this
In the end, it’s probably spot on. I do think I lean a little more toward your last statement, though. I do think Greg has a better chance at also averaging high teens or 20 points a game. It’s like Nate said, he seems to be getting so much more patient with his post ups (and reposts). Also, his reads on double teams and passing is becoming impressive in a small sample. If they just keep feeding him the ball, I could see his offense becoming much more varied and effective. That said, it is a decidedly optimistic view of his offense upside.
That's sort of what I was going for, Oden is scary
I’ve seen Bynum a little, not a lot, but I don’t see dudes cringing when they go in like they do against Oden. I still think Bynum is a player though.
Blazer Fan
by leeroyjenkins on Nov 24, 2009 2:24 PM PST up reply actions
I think you are selling Greg quite a bit short on offensive end.
Bynum has quite an arsenal of offensive moves, but Oden does not need to have a big arsenal. He only needs a right hand move and a counter move going left, which is in his arsenal since he can shoot the baby hook right or left handed.
Oden’s main game is power. Things he need to work on are establishing deep position and sealing guys, instead of a jumper or other fancy moves. In fact, I never want to see Greg shooting a jumper. Shaq (and D. Howard) should be his offensive model and while he’ll likely won’t be as prolific scorer as Shaq, 20 PPG is within his grasp since Greg is also blessed with one thing besides power that Shaq also had (soft touch) as well as one thing that Shaq never had (FT shooting).
I’m also with the consensus: Bynum now but Oden later for his ceiling. (and what a beautiful ceiling it is)
When Oden is on, he is much more difficult to handle. See Noah’s performance against him and Bynum. Bynum profits from the improved spacing and passing skills the other Lakers have, so on average you’ll likely get more good to very good nights from him, without many games where he has no impact. Injury-wise they are about the same. And as said before, I would be shocked if Bynum in year 5 wouldn’t be somewhat better than Greg in a few categories.
Ceterum censeo Lakers esse delendam
Oden kinda IS a 13 and 13 guy right now
If he was playing 30 minutes, that is, which I think is inevitable.
I hear you on the better defense = more foul problems = less time overall, but he’ll get up to 30 minutes sooner or later. And his offense, as raw as it is, is at the 13/13 level with VERY few shots. It’ll only get better.
He’s got a much nicer touch than Shaq or Howard; not as powerful as Shaq or as wildly athletic as Howard, but a good mix of the two. Plus, the FT shooting… we can go to him MUCH more, preferably on the move or with lobs, and get other bigs in foul trouble much more than we do now. And since you can’t foul him to stop him from scoring like you can with Shaq and Howard, eventually there will be no good solution.
I’m tellin’ ya, I’ll be shocked if he isn’t clearly capable of scoring 20+ppg within a few years. We might not have him scoring that much because of our pace and all-round offensive weaponry, but he’ll be at 18ppg or so and clearly able to average more if we didn’t have LMA, Roy, Rudy, Batum, Bayless, etc.
You watch the Lakers more than any of us, you’ve seen how they incorporate Bynum. He gets such easier shots, Kobe and Fish know how to get him those easy buckets, and Pau Gasol is one of the best interior passers at the PF spot I can remember watching. Bynum is certainly more refined offensively than Oden, but he also benefits GREATLY from being used better by his teammates.
Defense and rebounding out of a big is most important, and Bynum is only a little better than LMA at rebounding and does not exert a lot of effort on defense already… and as he ages and gets more accolades, that’s just gonna get worse.
If you had a game for your life tomorrow, you take Bynum. He is a better all-round player right now, and able to easily stay on the court. And I know I am a big Oden homer, but I take him in the long run. His defense, his PASSING (still very underrated; he rarely turns it over on the pass, unlike Howard’s first several years), his shot blocking, potentially league leading rebounding… that is all there right now.
The offense has been pretty good with very limited touches and not being used adequately at ALL. 13ppg is what he can do now, he’ll get a lot better offensively.
Mortimer
I totally agree.
*Unless KP has a secret plan that makes this statement incorrect.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><>
Oden is maybe a little more intimidating, but Bynum is still a huge presence in the paint.
Offensively he looks pretty awesome this year, which defenses must respect. Granted, Oden has been commanding consistent double teams lately, but Bynum is putting up regular all star numbers.
by dario argento on Nov 24, 2009 8:28 PM PST up reply actions
Did not like to be reminded of this by Chad Ford though....
Remember when Portland passed on CP3 because GM John Nash felt his recently drafted PG Sebastian Telfair was going to be a star?
my thoughts exactly
If they’d only listened to KP!!!
by kobisportsguy on Nov 24, 2009 10:56 AM PST up reply actions
Would Roy have been Roy and Paul have been Paul if they played together?
"A bizarre and extremely rare hybrid Blazer/Laker fan, Timbo has always struggled to contain the Beast Within, like Dr. Jekyll, Bruce Banner, or Ted Kennedy." — Miled Animal
I think Paul would be Paul
He’s just way too fierce not to demand the rock and take it by the horns. Not sure Brandon’s demeanor would have let him become what he is on a team with Chris. Sure Brandon is a leader, but Chris Paul’s got a nasty side.
its true but....
yeah we passed on Chris Paul, which sucks, but we wouldn’t have any of our other guys if we had taken him
If we take Paul in 2005, he would have been good and we would have won more games, and we would not have been in a position to take Roy and Aldridge the year after. An regardless of who we took in 2006 to pair with Paul, we probably would have been good to the point where we had no shot at the #1 pick we used to land Ode.
Not that they are completely mutually exclusive, but I’d rather have Roy, Aldridge, and Oden, than CP3 and a couple of late 1st rounders
by rip_city_swagger on Nov 24, 2009 11:49 AM PST up reply actions
oooh---good point---read em and weep---we got a big 3 instead of a CP3!
The Dude: Hey, careful, man, there's a beverage here!
by cavejunctionblazer on Nov 24, 2009 1:07 PM PST up reply actions
maybe u draft him and he gets hurt.
Please, for the love of all that is holy, please stop using the following: "Book it.", "FTW", "Epic" & "Fail".
...no seriously--stop.
We'd likely still had Roy, but not Aldridge
We could move lot of similar pieces still even if we drafted CP3 for a pick that turned out to Roy. LA would be harder to get because he was the #2 pick, which we traded our #4 to get.
Telfair had an Adidas contract though
for some reason that was in every story about him pre-draft lol like it mattered.
WOW HE HAS SHOES
Blazer Fan
by leeroyjenkins on Nov 24, 2009 2:25 PM PST up reply actions




















