BYRON SCOTT OFFENSIVE INSPIRATION
He's the one that can bring back players inspiration in the offensive end. A former succesful point guard who has proven to live up to the expectations according to the talent of his team. His philosophy won't give blake so many chances and just a few to bayless. His rotation logic is consistent game after game and is based in the inspiration and creativity that can reach his players.
Nate's offensive plays are so conservative that is impossible for a player to get inspired in that scheme. Team doesn't even run plays. I dont even think they have a play book. It's just give 1 on 1 with whoever has the ball. You never see clever moves in the offensive end as the lakers, for instance, does. His rotation logic(?) doesn't promote player's momentum. There's no consistent rotation where the players can stand on and play safety their games.
NATE DON'T STEAL FANS AND PLAYERS INSPIRATION!!!!
BYRON SCOTT OFFENSIVE INSPIRATION WE NEED!!!
PD: I don't think avery jonhson is a bad option, but byron scott is the best.
10 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
hello
The Faith don't panic, the faith freaks out, burns out farms, and torchs small villages in the name of The Faith.
Actually
David West said after Scott was fired that he liked the move because Scott’s didn’t know what he was doing on offense. They barely called plays anymore because they had CP3.
Ben II Blazersedge.com || New to Blazers' Edge?
Byron Scott was criticized heavily for relying too much on his star player.
He barley gave his young guys (Darren Collison) any run. I seriously doubt he would play Bayless anymore minutes than Nate would, possibly less even.
I’m not sure he’s a better coach than Nate, although he very well could be. The Devil you know is better than the one you don’t. Unless it’s an obvious coaching upgrade it just isn’t worth the risk.
by Nick Van Excellent on Nov 21, 2009 10:36 AM PST reply actions 1 recs
Scott's WAAAAAYYY Better than Nate
However I like Avery.
Adelman would be that final piece necessary though!!!!!
He barley gave his young guys (Darren Collison) any run. I seriously doubt he would play Bayless anymore minutes than Nate would, possibly less even.
Hey Nick van whatever, If we had a Star point guard, you probably would be right, but we don’t.
Star PG was irrelevant
Even with CP3 was out, Collison wasn’t getting any run.
"Woulda, Coulda, Mighta and Shoulda – the Four Horsemen of the Procrastocalypse" - Red-5
It's easier if you hit the reply button.
Roy is enough of a PG that Scott would probably just use him in the same way as Paul. A bunch of pick and rolls, pick and pops with Aldridge. Which would be fine, but I doubt we would be running plays for Oden or giving Bayless minutes.
He just doesn’t develop his young guys, which I think is part of the reason that roster is so thin. He also has seems to have a pretty bad attitude lately, which is part of the reason he got fired. Delaying the team flight so you can play golf, especially when the team is doing poorly lacks judgment and rubbed the management the wrong way.
To me it seems like a lateral move. Scott isn’t running difficult, interesting, or thoughtful plays. His rotations are more suspect than Nate and his roster choices (Posey) haven’t exactly panned out.
by Nick Van Excellent on Nov 21, 2009 5:55 PM PST up reply actions
I think that this would simply be trading one set of problems for another set of problems.
We don’t need another coach that ignores or improperly handles the development of young players that clearly have raw skills that need time on the court.
Blazer's Edge Ambassador to The Dream Shake Blog
LMA Rocks!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I <3 LMA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
LMA - Putting the POWER in POWER FORWARD!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
The concussion must have jarred him into "Destroy All Opposition Terminator Mode!" - BlazersOrBust
Stop playing the 3 Guard Line up and Stop Using the 2 Foul Rule – NATE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
You are aware that Byron Scott was a SG, not a PG?
How did you guys win that?
"We scored enough points. We scored 107, they scored 105.
-Nate McMillan Postgame, 3/4/2009

by 



















