Is Roy a Good Teammate?
I like Brandon Roy a lot. As a Blazer fan, how can you not? He fits the culture perfectly. He's skilled beyond measure. ROY and 2-time all star in 3 years. And now, he commands our loyalty if, for no other reason, he's locked up for a while with a big contract.
But I've sometimes felt a vague disquiet watching him play. And I see that diquiet on the BEdge at times.
- Roy has to have the ball in his hands
- Roy talks to the officials about a no-call instead of getting back on defense
- Roy walks the ball up the court
- Roy doesn't run the fast break
- Roy doesn't play off the ball well
- Roy can't play with Miller (people don't say that much any more)
- Roy can't play with Rudy
- Roy can't play with Sergio
- Roy can't play defense; Roy doesn't try on defense
- Roy plays too much one on one
- etc.
I don't know how much of this is true. But I started to think about how to quantify what Roy means to a team. Do people want to play with Roy? Is a good teammate? When I hear people talk about the "right way" to play basketball--something McMillan says all the time--I think of team basketball, lots of passing, lots of running, lots of defense. The "right way" doesn't really describe Roy for at least some of the time.
Is it heresy? Can anyone even say these things without getting stoned?
So I went through the play-by-play of the games this season. I looked at all the points Roy scored (excluding free throws) that were assisted by another player or created on his own. One of the knocks is that Roy works all by himself in isolation in this 1-4 offense (a term I never heard of before Roy). How many of Roy's points are "in the flow" versus self-created? (Caveats: I don't know if free throws were "assisted" or not, nor are missed shots the result of one-on-one play or not... my sense is that a great deal of the free throws were the result of one-on-one action--a significant part of Roy's scoring.)
It turns out that 53.4% of Roy's points have been "unassisted." More than half. But is that too much? It turns out that of the 13 games played this far in the season, Roy has scored over half his points "unassisted" in five of those games:
- 9 to 5 (Denver)
- 15 to 4 (San Antonio)
- 8 to 3 (New Orleans)
- 16 to 3 (Charlotte)
- 8 to 7 (Altanta)
Does this promote stagnant offense? Is this appropriate for your superstar? I'll be frank: I was surprised that it was only five games. I thought it would be more. Perhaps I have inhuman expectations of Roy.
The other thing I took a look at was the type of assists that Roy dished out. If Roy is passing for layups and dunks, why that's a fun thing and it's a joy to play with a teammate who provides you with easy buckets. On the other hand, assists that lead to jump shots--well, that's a different story. It means the receipient of the pass is generally standing around waiting for something to happen and perhaps not involved in the offense (I'm thinking of complaints from Batum and Rudy along with the pretty weak expectations of offense from Blake and Webster: just make 3s). Moreover, a pass for a wide-open jumper carries a different kind of pressure. The sort of pressure that says: "Don't let me down... you'd better make this!!" Maybe not a "flaming bag" pass but certainly a pass that carries the weight of expectations with it.
It turns out that 37.8% of Roy's assists have been for easy buckets (almost exclusively to "bigs") with the majority going for pressure-packed jump shots (often 3s). Of the 13 games, 7 of them featured more perimeter assists than "paint assists."
- 4 to 1 (Houston)
- 5 to 0 (OK City)
- 4 to 2 (Atlanta)
- 5 to 2 (Memphis)
- 4 to 1 (Minnesota)
- 5 to 0 (Charlotte)
- 3 to 2 (Detroit)
So it's awesome that Portland's mega-star guard actually passes the ball as much as he does to generate these assists. But, I do have this vague disquiet about the style of assist.
I watched Roy pretty closely in the Detroit game as I was letting these matters percolate in my head. What I saw Roy do, I'm not sure I ever noticed before. Maybe he was tired. He played a lot of minutes. But he took plays off. Just like Randy Moss took plays off in Minnesota, Roy would camp out at the 3 literally with hands on hips not even remotely involved in the offense. Again, do I have inhuman expectations in that I expect him to set an off-screen or move a bit or perhaps look around for a long offensive rebound? I do know that this isn't what Rudy or Bayless do when they're on the floor. But maybe Roy doesn't have to.
In summary, I think I'm looking for Roy's game to continue to evolve. I guess I'm saying that--all star though he is--if doesn't develop further I don't think he's worth the contract. I don't think that he can legitimately say that he's making his teammates better. He is most certainly making the winning percentage better... but I don't think the individual games of Rudy, LMA, Batum, Webster or any of these other guys is necessarily better when he's on the floor. I want to see him catch a pass from someone else on the move. I want him to create opportunities for other players that don't involve a perimeter jumper. And most of all, I want to see some off ball effort.
Or maybe he needs to be the PG after all? Maybe my "disquiet" is completely unwarranted in the face of a fine start to a season and games where Portland has really dominated teams for majority portions of games.
Is anyone else disquieted?
108 comments
|
9 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Actually
Roy plays decoy a lot so that we can get wide open jumpers. A wide open jumper is a GOOD SHOT. It is not the best shot, but that is why the other team gives it up rather than allowing the drive. After a few wide open J’s, the defense starts to stick to their own men, and then Roy gets more room to operate/dish to the paint. Then the D starts cheating off their men and packing the paint to prevent Roy’s drive and Roy starts passing for the open jumper again.
Jabs aren’t the most powerful punch, but they feel out the opponent and set up the straights, crosses, hooks, and uppercuts.
Come on you gotta listen unto me,
lay off that whiskey and let that cocaine be. ~Johnny Cash
by HurraKane212 on Nov 19, 2009 10:05 PM PST reply actions 1 recs
this is a great post
Against Houston last year, I always found myself screaming “Pass the ball Roy”.
I like Roy. As a matter of fact, I love Roy. But, in the heat of the moment, when I wanted was for the Blazers to pull out a win, I found myself being incredibly irritated with his style of play.
I hate to sound like Bill Simmons, but if I had to rank the players on the Blazers whom I would want to play with, Roy would be down near the bottom. To play with Roy, you need to be prepared to spend a significant amount of time standing around.
by John Park Williams on Nov 19, 2009 10:15 PM PST reply actions
I completely disagree
1) Roy carried us to 2 wins in the playoffs last year when all of our teammates, aside from LMA, were playing pretty terrible.
2) I’m a shooter, so I would love to play with Brandon. Do you see the shots he sets Blake, Rudy, and co. up with? It’s no coincidence in the 2 years since joining Portland (not counting this year), Blake has shot over 40% from 3 point land, something he only managed one other time in his whole career.
"Your best?!?!! Losers always whine about their best. Winners go home and &^%@ the prom queen"
2008 Civil War: Oregon 65 - Oregon State 38
by cloudydays on Nov 19, 2009 11:16 PM PST up reply actions 1 recs
that one other time was also when he was with the blazers...
"There are a few teams you have to watch out for in the fourth quarter."
"Yeah, but Portland definitely is not one of them."
-New Orleans Hornets broadcasters at the end of the third quarter with the Hornets leading 74-59. Portland later ends up winning 97-89.
"They don't mind him shooting that shot at all. Rudy Fernandez is not that great of a 3pt shooter."
-New Orleans Hornets broadcasters right after a Rudy Fernandez missed 3pter. Rudy Fernandez finished the game with three 3pters on six attempts.
by Tofu Anonymous on Nov 19, 2009 11:45 PM PST up reply actions
was it?
I only glanced at the years he played and his 3P%
"Your best?!?!! Losers always whine about their best. Winners go home and &^%@ the prom queen"
2008 Civil War: Oregon 65 - Oregon State 38
yup
"There are a few teams you have to watch out for in the fourth quarter."
"Yeah, but Portland definitely is not one of them."
-New Orleans Hornets broadcasters at the end of the third quarter with the Hornets leading 74-59. Portland later ends up winning 97-89.
"They don't mind him shooting that shot at all. Rudy Fernandez is not that great of a 3pt shooter."
-New Orleans Hornets broadcasters right after a Rudy Fernandez missed 3pter. Rudy Fernandez finished the game with three 3pters on six attempts.
by Tofu Anonymous on Nov 20, 2009 7:22 AM PST up reply actions
Why do you think they played so badly when it counted?
Perhaps because they weren’t prepared for the moment since during the season they constantly iso’ed Roy when they needed a basket? Maybe?
Blazer Fan
by leeroyjenkins on Nov 20, 2009 6:46 AM PST up reply actions 1 recs
Yup
Defense gets stiffer in the playoffs. Every one knows Houston was a “bad” matchup, but really ANY playoff team is going to come up with a way to deal with Brandon, since they’ll be completely focused on the Portland offense for 4-7 games.
This is why Hedo was pursued, and Miller eventually signed. The team needed another “creator” to diversify the offense and make the Blazers tougher to stop in late game situations. The regular season is the “laboratory” and the sooner Roy realizes how much “professor” Miller can get him (and others) easy baskets, the better prepared the team will be to advance in the playoffs. (To be fair, Andre has a ways to go re: figuring out how to best work together with his new teammates. They’ve improved as a unit over the past few weeks, and hopefully they’ll all stay healthy so they can continue to “jell”)
When reached 40 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!
by two4larue on Nov 20, 2009 11:07 AM PST up reply actions 1 recs
If you are playing with Roy and Nate is the coach ...
… standing around is likely to get you on the bench.
hakkaa päälle !
Roy is a great teammate
but right now he (and frankly, the entire team) are defining roles and learning how to play with the new pieces in place. Now, we’ve all seen from the Houston series that “Brandon, do it on your own” is not going to be a long term success, so I’m hoping these are just growing pains on the offensive end building toward a full team offense
"man, steve blake is clutch *dead*" - Ben Golliver on Twitter
I really, really enjoy your posts
I can’t count the number of times I’ve found myself nodding in agreement, respect or both while reading a post and come to your name at the bottom of it.
"One of the bright spots of the young season has been rookie point guard Jonny Flynn, whose name sounds like he should be the lead character in a Broadway Musical. "What are you doing here, Jonny Flynn?" "Why I'm here to court trouble, and woo a girl, and build the most fantastical contraption the world has ever seen!" -- Dave, Game 7 Blazers versus Timberwolves preview
by BlazersOrBust on Nov 20, 2009 4:07 PM PST up reply actions
Thank you for the compliment
I enjoy reading your thoughts on the team as well. The thing I’m trying to keep in mind with the squad this year is that, while the talent is definitely there, this is still a “growth” year for a lot of individual players and the team as a whole. There will be games where they look like a contender, and other nights where Golden State can get them with 8 players. It’s still a work in progress.
"man, steve blake is clutch *dead*" - Ben Golliver on Twitter
by blazeraddict on Nov 22, 2009 3:40 PM PST up reply actions
Really good post
I think you raise some great points. I tend to have the same ambivalence about Roy’s game sometimes. On the one hand, it’s great to see him break down guys one-on-one and take over games by himself, but I also agree with Dwight Jaynes that when it matters most (i.e. in a playoff series), teams will find ways to stop that sort of play.
It’s hard to answer the questions you raise at this point in the season, but I do worry that his game is becoming a little stagnant, especially after tying ourselves to him for such a huge contract. Although he has been a good soldier about playing the three, he doesn’t look too much like he is trying to adapt his game that much. Hopefully, playing with Miller and Oden (a big guy who can actually score) will help him continue his progression, but yes, I definitely am a little disquieted.
He draws double teams
That gets open shots for other players, whether the assist was from Roy or not. He’s been unselfish to a fault this season, and I think that’s why he’s looked less than wonderful in the 4th, often settling for the J instead of getting to the rim. He’s had numerous turnovers making one too many passes, forcing it.
As I’m typing this, I look down and see JK’s comment and we’re on the same page.
Witty Unpredictable Talent and Natural Game
* Since he hasn't been looking to score all game, in the 4th, he just doesn't have any rythym
Witty Unpredictable Talent and Natural Game
The Rockets
didnt stop Roy they stopped the rest of the team except of course Aldridge.
you guys sound nba.com
they were freaking out about his 2 point game against Minnesota, not even looking at the stat line and the fact that we blew the Wolves out of the water. his game has been incredibly unselfish this year, and in crunch time, there’s nobody better, not Kobe, not Lebron, not D Wade, nobody. he could take all his talent and jack up 30 shots a game, but he gets other guys involved. only Lebron better understands how to take the attention of the defense and then get a teammate an open shot (jumper or dunk). right player for the right team.
he does need to run the break a little more tho..
Sorry spartks89 (and Dave) but this an unbelievably laughable homer comment
crunch time, there’s nobody better, not Kobe, not Lebron, not D Wade
rec
he’s been deferring too much recently. the 3rd quarter yesterday was the first time in awhile where he took the game over on offense.
"Your best?!?!! Losers always whine about their best. Winners go home and &^%@ the prom queen"
2008 Civil War: Oregon 65 - Oregon State 38
Yup
The Blazers should have won the Atlanta game and they would have if Roy would have played like a max contract guy.
they stopped Brandon in games 3,4 when they needed to
Game 5 back in Portland Roy went off for 47 points, but in games 1,6 it didn’t matter what he did
games 3 & 4 were when Houston “won” the series, because they got more “stops” down the stretch than Portland. Brandon was frustrated after those games
When reached 40 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!
the only
down game he had in that series was in game 3 where he just looked so passive and didnt look to attack the rim like he had the previous two games. I dont think he was frustrated at all in the other games of that series. If outlaw had played decent they win that series.
Not too worried.
Because I think Roy is starting to realize that for the Blazers to win he needs to get his teammates involved especially at the end of games. I am heartened to hear the recent interviews where he has acknowledged this. Even the last game you saw this at the end when the Pistons had him totally bottled up.
In a way though he was trying too hard to move the ball and passed up a couple of open jumpers he should have taken. So on the other hand I agree with Jsnake also. Brandon is a cerebral player, I am not worried about him at all. He is no Kobe and even Kobe has figured out you cannot win it by yourself.
Roy is one of the best teammates in the NBA
"Your best?!?!! Losers always whine about their best. Winners go home and &^%@ the prom queen"
2008 Civil War: Oregon 65 - Oregon State 38
by cloudydays on Nov 19, 2009 11:05 PM PST reply actions 1 recs
Trade him before the rest of the league finds out
Maybe we can clear space for Allen Iverson or Ron Artest.
You won.
by Roybot on Nov 11, 2009 1:41 AM PST
You say during the Detroit game
Roy would camp out at the 3 literally with hands on hips not even remotely involved in the offense.
That’s what people do when they’ve played 6 games in 9 days.
"Aneurysm".
When Outlaw wins a game on a last-second shot, it’s called an "annthefaneurysm". QualityPie
like the post
a lot of people say “he’s saving himself for the 4th quarter” or “the playoff run” or what not but it just sorta doesn’t click for me. this is his job we are talking about. he is being paid far too much money to not try very hard for 3 quarters. i love how roy has an innate sense of deferring to teammates when they need the lift or are hitting (like the pass to miller late against detroit to show confidence in andre’s ft ability after a few misses). i hate how kobe always feels the need to get up at least 20 shots a game, even in blow outs. but i don’t think roy taking plays off b/c he is tired or saving himself is a legitimate excuse for a 25 year old in the first month of the nba season.
by gotyourselfastew on Nov 20, 2009 12:32 AM PST reply actions
They've
turned him into what he was his junior and sophmore years in college where he would just float around and hardly be noticeable playing off the ball. He didnt become who he is until he was finally handed the offense and basically became the pg at sg. Roy playing off the ball is a disservice to this team
by BBG on Nov 20, 2009 1:21 AM PST reply actions 1 recs
To talk about all your points on Roy.
Roy has to have the ball in his hands: Well yeah. Every superstar has to have the ball in their hands. Kobe, LeBron, and Carmelo Anthony. He should have the ball in his hands. That’s what he’s best at.
Roy talks to the officials about a no-call instead of getting back on defense: So does every superstar in the NBA. It’s called working the officials. Every superstar does it to get the call the next time.
Roy walks the ball up the court: Yeah, well that’s his style. What do you want him to do sprint up court? Walking the ball up the court doesn’t make him a bad teammate. It’s how he plays.
Roy doesn’t run the fast break: Now this is a valid point. I’d like to see Roy run more. It would really help the team.
Roy doesn’t play off the ball well: Well he’s getting better. He’ll improve over his career and during this season. Roy hasn’t had to play off the ball at all in his pro career. Now he finally has someone to take pressure of of him he has to learn to play off the ball.
Roy can’t play with Miller (people don’t say that much any more): People don’t say that much anymore because he’s getting better.
Roy can’t play with Rudy: Well usually Roy wouldn’t have to play with Rudy. The Blazers are very deep but because of the injuries Roy has to be on the floor more.
Roy can’t play with Sergio: Well Sergio isn’t there anymore so I don’t know why you would say that.
Roy can’t play defense; Roy doesn’t try on defense: Well I don’t know what you’re watching. Roy can play defense. When you say nobody tries on defense. Well neither does anyone in the entire NBA until the post season.
Roy plays too much one on one: Again, so do the top tier stars in the league. Brandon is one of the best 1 on 1 guys in the NBA. There are few if any players in the NBA that can stop him 1 on 1. So Roy should play 1 on 1. That’s what got them to 54 wins last season.
by Aaron Sass on Nov 20, 2009 2:34 AM PST reply actions 10 recs
"There are few if any players in the NBA that can stop him 1 on 1"
Few teams guard him 1 v. 1 anymore
Blazer Fan
by leeroyjenkins on Nov 20, 2009 6:43 AM PST up reply actions 1 recs
#2
is nonsense.
bq.Roy talks to the officials about a no-call instead of getting back on defense: So does every superstar in the NBA. It’s called working the officials. Every superstar does it to get the call the next time.
There are plenty of opportunities to jaw to the refs after whistles, not while the other team is attacking on your basket. Sometimes Roy doesn’t hustle back even when he’s not jawing at the refs.
I totally disagree that every superstar regularly creates (as does Roy) a 5 on 4 situation for his teammates.
"The only 'Advanced Metric' that matters is what you see with your eyes." -Timbo, Nov., 2009.
I've always been uneasy about the insistence that it's 'Roy's team'
I think Roy is a really good player, probably the all-around best on the team. But it’s still a team. I don’t care whether Roy goes to the All-Star game. I don’t care if he averages 20 points. I care whether the team wins and I think a Roy-dominated team is very easy to defend.
Blazer Fan
by leeroyjenkins on Nov 20, 2009 6:42 AM PST reply actions 2 recs
As shown in the playoffs last year.
A Roy dominated team to the point of last year will get us into the playoffs, but no further. A Lebron dominated team couldn’t even get them into the Finals, and Roy will never be Lebron. He and the team need to evolve. He can stay our go to superstar, but his 1 on 4 game is very limiting in the playoffs as a team. Way too easy to defend.
by Coastie07 on Nov 20, 2009 8:47 AM PST up reply actions 1 recs
This is a great point
A Lebron dominated team couldn’t even get them into the Finals, and Roy will never be Lebron. He and the team need to evolve.
lebrons teammates
choked in the playoffss just like roy’s (mo williams) not to mention they played a better team with more weapons than them. Lebron had to dominate.
The fact Roy has much better teammates than Lebron...
Is even more reason why we need to have more of a team oriented game and flow.
selfish
"There are a few teams you have to watch out for in the fourth quarter."
"Yeah, but Portland definitely is not one of them."
-New Orleans Hornets broadcasters at the end of the third quarter with the Hornets leading 74-59. Portland later ends up winning 97-89.
"They don't mind him shooting that shot at all. Rudy Fernandez is not that great of a 3pt shooter."
-New Orleans Hornets broadcasters right after a Rudy Fernandez missed 3pter. Rudy Fernandez finished the game with three 3pters on six attempts.
I would like to see the Blazers become like the 98-2002 teams
in terms of scoring distribution. If I remember correctly, nobody averaged more than 20 points a game but there were like 5-6 players who averaged over 10 points…and at least 2 more players hovering right under 10 points a game.
"There are a few teams you have to watch out for in the fourth quarter."
"Yeah, but Portland definitely is not one of them."
-New Orleans Hornets broadcasters at the end of the third quarter with the Hornets leading 74-59. Portland later ends up winning 97-89.
"They don't mind him shooting that shot at all. Rudy Fernandez is not that great of a 3pt shooter."
-New Orleans Hornets broadcasters right after a Rudy Fernandez missed 3pter. Rudy Fernandez finished the game with three 3pters on six attempts.
The lack of a go-to star was one of the major weaknesses of those Blazer teams...
We couldn’t keep up with the likes of Duncan, Shaq, and Kobe in crunch time. The greatest teams have great players who can will themselves into scoring or creating an easy score nearly every trip down the court in crunch time. Brandon is one of the few guys in the league who can do that. It’s a rare talent nearly every championship team has had. Going all the way without a super-star almost never happens. It requires a really special aligning of the stars.
I disagree. When they needed a bucket, they went to Smitty
He was a great crunch time scorer that was automatic with that 15-18 foot turnaround of his. He owned opposing wing players in the high-post area. Unfortunately, we forgot to go to him in “The Game that shall not be mentioned”.
by the time Smitty got the ball in that 4th quarter
Shaq knocked him down and the refs said “play on”
When reached 40 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!
I've noticed him taking plays off on defense this year, which is worse.
But he took plays off. Just like Randy Moss took plays off in Minnesota, Roy would camp out at the 3 literally with hands on hips not even remotely involved in the offense.
I’m pretty much to the point where I’d trade Brandon Roy for Deron Williams straight up.
But I don’t think Utah would.
"A bizarre and extremely rare hybrid Blazer/Laker fan, Timbo has always struggled to contain the Beast Within, like Dr. Jekyll, Bruce Banner, or Ted Kennedy." — Miled Animal
If you could construct your fantasy roster (for real-life basketball), would it look more like the Blazers, Lakers, or Jazz?
Ceterum censeo Lakers esse delendam
I like how Timbo has lately made me seem like a sunny optimist.
On a side note, I’m also curious as to how Timbo would go about constructing a roster from the ground on up.
Dear Paul Allen:
Fire Nate McMillan & hire Jeff Van Gundy.
Sincerely,
AK1984
timbo, I know you love the Blazers
it’s just their players that you hate.
When I checked in here a few days back, you were disparaging the Blazers’ franchise center as a cumbersome, uncoordinated oaf.
Your unhappiness with the starting power forward’s game and lack of interior toughness is well documented.
Now, you’re ready to ship Portland’s cornerstone player off to a town where it’s tough to find a decent pint.
Dude, you need to relax. Try hanging out on my side of the street for awhile. Then you’ll recall what real pain feels like – the pain of rooting for a team that’s yearning to add Allen Iverson to a roster that’s already glutted with hopless chucks like Al Harrington and Larry Hughes.
by knickfan on Nov 20, 2009 12:24 PM PST up reply actions 9 recs
Hopless chucks ...
I love that description. And it’s just a applicable with a couple of letter changes.
hakkaa päälle !
Are you suggesting a 3 pg lineup
By trading Roy for Willliams, would you start Williams Miller and Blake together?
I like williams but I like Roy better. But getting both of them on the same team would be better than a CP#/Roy combo in my opinion. Maybe we could trade Miller and Blake for Williams instead.
Timbo, last year didn't you trade your mom ...
… for a Heneken pony keg and a case of Pringles BBQ chips?
hakkaa päälle !
It's funny that we're having this discussion about whether Roy is a good teammate...
everytime I watch the Blazers on ESPN or TNT, the guys calling the game are constantly saying Roy:
*"plays the right way"
*"he doesn’t force anything"
*"he’s such an unselfish player"
*"he plays at his own pace"
*"I love how he never gets too high or low emotionally during games"
I agree with some of the sentiments, such as it would be nice if Roy could run the fast break better. And also, I would like to see him more physical and aggressive on the offensive side of the ball (though I think part of this is playing the small forward position and being guarded by bigger players). However, I wonder if we (Blazeredge folks) are having difficulty seeing the forest through the trees. Maybe we are too close to this team and overanalyze it, to really appreciate the kind of player Roy is, like the ESPN and TNT staff are able to? Just a thought.
by JasonT on Nov 20, 2009 8:19 AM PST reply actions 1 recs
I should explain
“play at his own pace” is referred to in a positive light…in that Roy doesn’t get rattled and he doesn’t allow the other team to dictate how he is going to play.
I have never heard one of these television play by play guys say anything that would indicate that they thought Roy was not a good teammate. Not that these guys are end all be all when it comes to opinions about Roy, but sometimes I think they have a better perspective than us, b/c we are so close to this team.
Thanks for this
I’m kind of with you on this. I hear all this stuff that states how great Roy is… and then there’s the funny feeling in the back of my head. So I’m legitimately asking, do I personally have unrealistic expectations of Roy? Inhuman ones? Expectations no one could reasonably fulfill?
Buck Williams for the hall of fame
Yes
Compared to most any other marquis player out there, he is very unselfish. If you ever get a chance, watch games that dont have the Blazers in them and you will see what many of us are saying. Our hated nemesis K0be used to be an amazingly selfish player till Pau ended up landing in his lap as a teammate and he realized that if he were to play WITH the rest of his team, they would win more. Guess what, they did. They won, a lot.
Roy knows this. He was quoted many times over the last few years with saying he was excited with the team we had because you never knew who would end up breaking out any given night and that was hard for teams to defend. He was right. However what really upsets me about this season, that same team first attitude doesnt seem to be there. That upsets me more then Roy being nominated by some as the most selfish player on the team. I feel the team has become more selfish in general due to the pressure of such a great season last year. Its unfortunate.
The announcers are right, he does play the right way. He is a breath of fresh air in the remains of the Thug Life NBA. I hope it stays that way.
"OK, it's going to rain tomorrow. And there is going to be a Greenpeace meeting and hippies are going to be protesting" ~ The Buffet of Goodness on Portland
The other thing I took a look at was the type of assists that Roy dished out. If Roy is passing for layups and dunks, why that’s a fun thing and it’s a joy to play with a teammate who provides you with easy buckets. On the other hand, assists that lead to jump shots—well, that’s a different story. It means the receipient of the pass is generally standing around waiting for something to happen and perhaps not involved in the offense (I’m thinking of complaints from Batum and Rudy along with the pretty weak expectations of offense from Blake and Webster: just make 3s).
I think you’ve missed the mark. The players you’ve alluded to here have games centered on being shooters. None of them can post up. None of them have the ability to consistently slash (though Batum and Webster show flashes). Why wouldn’t they love a teammate who is able to pull their defender away and give them the ball for a wide open shot? It doesn’t mean they aren’t involved in the offense… the offense is actually built around them being able to hit those shots. It’s a strength for this team. And because they are good at these shots, it should be veiwed the same as the dunks… they were provided an easy bucket by a teammate.
Furthermore, teams with the some of the best records in the league and considered to be Title favorites include the F@kers, Nuggets, and Cavs. K0be, Carmello, and LBJ are all in the top 5 in points per game and play for these teams. If anything, Roy should be trying to score more.
Fans love dunks; they’re a joy for us to see. Fans don’t love jumpers; they’re cringe inducing. I’m all for more dunks, as I believe you probably are.
An offensive rebound in paragraph form. -Mr. Golliver
by you'vegottomakeyourfreethrows on Nov 20, 2009 10:00 AM PST reply actions
even MJordan
needed Paxson and Kerr as an outlet, to knock down open jumpers and spread the floor
When reached 40 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!
And even then
I may be misremembering, but Jordan in those title years rarely got the ball at near half court at the top of the shot clock and was just told to beat his man. Sure, MJ had as many or more shots at the end of games than Brandon does now, but it wasn’t in such a predictable setup that required him to do so much every time down the court. I remember a lot of Scottie bringing the ball up and dumping it to Jordan on the wing or in the post, but not a ton of clearouts after clearout.
The late game offense much more resembles the Cavs’ last year, which led to monster numbers from LeBron (possibly the best ever in a playoff series), but just absolute dreck from everyone else and a 5 game loss.
I have no problem with Brandon taking as many or more shots in crunch-time than he is now, but I think we need to be a little more creative as to where those shots are coming from. What we’re doing now requires a ton of effort from him on every offensive possession. If we can make it a little easier on him, he’ll have more left defensively to really try and put the screws on his man.
by Royster on Nov 20, 2009 4:24 PM PST up reply actions 1 recs
him playing off
the ball is not easier for him. Thats something that a player like ray allen or martell can excel at but roys not that type. In the spurs game roy could have had 30 or more points but instead he played off the ball allowing his defender to guard him much more easily.
and Hodges
"I play, Coach stays. He goes, I go." - Jimmy Chitwood
by DucRider on Nov 20, 2009 4:24 PM PST via mobile up reply actions
This Post is further proof...
That statistics can be used to “prove” anything!..
I don’t need numbers like these to decide if Roy is a good teammate or not. If you watch the games you can see the respect his actual teammates have for him. That of course is only the friendly / emotional part of being a good teammate. As far as being an effective teammate goes micro numbers such as these do not do justice to the bigger picture.
The progress and maturation of this team in not only results but culture has been well documented. We shouldn’t need to re-hash the whole ROY, 2 time All Star, clutch game winner stuff. The fact is there are probably many 10 game stretches that can be plucked out of anybodies resume’ and, when taken in that context, used to cast a negative light on that players performance.
I absolutely disagree with this statement…
I guess I’m saying that—all star though he is—if doesn’t develop further I don’t think he’s worth the contract.
If any player in the NBA could be said to have earned their money before it was made it would be Brandon. Remember where we’ve come from. Taking a 10 game stretch out of a 250 game career that led us from Jailblazer laughing stocks to arguably the tightest knit, highest character bunch in the NBA and using it to make a statement like that holds no water for me and is, in my opinion, laughable.
I appreciate the hard work and time you put into this post… I just don’t think these numbers come anywhere near giving an accurate assessment of the value of Brandon Roy as a teammate.
GO BLAZERS!!!
by Ilikeemall on Nov 20, 2009 10:05 AM PST reply actions 10 recs
Well said.
All the Roy haters need to take a deep breath, step back, and get some perspective.
I'm not a hater...
I’m really just trying to understand the game better. We’ve all seen this kind of sentiment at one time or another on the boards. From lots of people. I’m also sensitive to the fact that players have felt under-used (I’m thinking of Rudy and Batum.)
So, I think it’s only natural to ask: what does a perfect teammate look like? What would the statistics show?
As I said, I was happily surprised at how many Roy baskets were assisted rather than one-on-one play. I think it demonstrates my skewed view from merely watching the game.
But I don’t think they’re unreasonable questions to ask.
Buck Williams for the hall of fame
No offense... And I may be wrong...
but these kind of numbers don’t appear to be the kind of thing you just stumble upon…. I have to think you were in pursuit of something to indicate Brandon not being a good teammate.
If you were looking for something more positive I am very sure you would have found that also.
I’m not sure I’d call you a hater but this accusatory type of a post has that kind of an edge to it in many eyes.
-
what does a perfect teammate look like?
The perfect teammate looks like Jarron Collins (he also looks like Jason Collins).
Willing to take a painful charge, but more than willing to let everybody else score and even get all the rebounds assists blocks and steals because they don’t want to take away another player on their team’s measurable statistic.
dinasour type of guys choir boys
You did not "stumble" upon anything you did not see "this kind of sentiment" on this board unless you are regularly on o-live or s2
in your own post here you said:
So I went through the play-by-play of the games this season
…………
don’t try to front like this is just questioning further what others here have been saying.
Our team is damned lucky to have brandon roy. This year we are 9-4. The team went 4-1 on a long road trip. The team has lost it’s starter and key 6th man. The team has a new pointguard. The team has a new starting center.
I argue that in the face of such tremendous adversity, which would no doubt hinder many lesser teams, our record and play is testament to great and steady leadership-of Brandon Roy.
Sophia
The Princess of Blazersedge
It just takes an iron fist to keep the riff raff under control and her princess hand is mad strong- Idoltime
The desire to win a championship
this is another one of those things that can’t be measured. Heart. Drive. Desire. “Hates to lose” attitude. Killer instinct.
Some guys that are driven to succeed can be real jerks in a team environment. Not Roy. This “gentlemanly nature” could be construed as “well, he isn’t really a vocal leader” because he isn’t screaming at his teammates on the court—like MJ, K*be or Shaq—but this impression would be far from the truth. Brandon gets his point across, backchannel. During practice. In the lockerroom. On the plane. He expects to win and he thinks/talks about the team all the time, unless he’s back at home.
Is Roy perfect? Of course not. He gets tired and needs to rest and let another player carry the load, at least for part of the game. I think guarding SFs is wearing him down, and he’s going to have less energy to drive the ball and get knocked to the floor on every 4th quarter possession. Does that mean he’s gotten soft, now that he’s gotten paid? To think that is not to know Roy.
Brandon and Greg aren’t going to be satisfied until they’ve won it all. That kind of attitude is a rare gift for Blazer fans.
When reached 40 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!
Now this is the way to disagree with someone.
Well done. I too have been a little frustrated with Brandon this season so far, and overall I agree with what you said here, but what I really want to do is compliment you how you’ve conducted yourself here.
Nothing frustrates me more than when people respond to someone else’s thoughtful comment by simply dismissing it as, “No, you’re wrong,” which I have seen more and more often around here. Thanks for this.
"These are dreams that we have." --Rudolfo Fernandez
Roy needs the ball in his hands
I was going to do a fanpost about this, but I think it fits here. People are always talking about how Brandon “needs the ball in his hands to be effective.” As such, we need a good shooter to pair with him, particularly down the stretch when it’s “Brandon time.” And it’s not that important that the shooter be able to dribble or pass particularly well. Clearly, Brandon has a great repertoire of moves to get by players, shoot over them, draw fouls, finish at the rack and find the open teammate. But this all happens when he gets the ball around the three point line.
Brandon has proven to be much less effective when acting against a defense that is wholly focus on preventing him from making a play. When he brings the ball up the court and is trapped, he gives the ball up relatively easily. His teammates then tend to pass and dribble around the perimeter aimlessly, before the ball finds its way back to Brandon with limited time on the shot clock.
If you compare Brandon’s behavior in this situation to other ball-dominant guards, there’s a marked difference. Chris Paul, Kobe, Wade and others will do one of three things when faced with a trap designed to get the ball out of their hands: (1) keep dribbling, either around or through the press, or draw a blocking foul by running into one of the trappers while his feet is moving (2) give the ball up for momentary relief, but immediately seek the return to initiate the offense (3) see a teammate with an advantage resulting from the 4-3 situations spread across the rest of the court, and make an incisive pass leading to a quality shot for a teammate.
Brandon tends to pass the ball to Steve Blake far from the basket, who supposedly works the best with Brandon. However, Steve has exactly the wrong instincts and skills for going after a defense that is trapping. Steve’s instincts are to take the safe pass. Unfortunately, we want the ball in Brandon’s hands, and the defense is intent on making the return to Brandon as difficult as possible. To make matters worse, when Steve begins to dribble against a high pressure, high energy defense, his play-making capabilities seem to vanish. Thus, Steve dribbles around the perimeter, wasting precious shot clock time before making a “safe” pass to a teammate who’s not in position to make a play.
The maxim that “Brandon needs the ball” presupposes that our team is capable of getting Brandon the ball in a position to be effective on a regular basis. Until he shows that he can either keep the ball effectively despite defensive efforts to take it away, or that he can get sufficiently open so Steve Blake can find him, Andre needs to be on the floor. Because the Brandon time offense doesn’t work if Brandon doesn’t have the ball.
by atomiccafe on Nov 20, 2009 10:38 AM PST reply actions 1 recs
Nice post...
I especially liked this para:
If you compare Brandon’s behavior in this situation to other ball-dominant guards, there’s a marked difference
I see where your coming from...
I know the feeling.. but at the same time, I think you are worried over nothing this early in the season. Knowing your teammates takes time and with two new starters, it can be difficult. Miller plays a different style than any player Roy has played with in college or the NBA as of yet.
Brandon does need the ball in his hands and rightfully so, he is an excellent scorer and distributer. I know you feel as if he isnt creating quality shots, but we are a JUMPSHOOTING team. thats what we do, so drive and kick is the appropriate play. If you want to discuss him making better passes for easier buckets, thats really a knock on Nate and his lack of running a motion offense. I imagine if he stressed that people need to cut to the hoop, it would create more layups but also cause some confusion in the lane (especially in a 1-4 set, in which is it nearly impossible).
I think Brandon will run the fast break more the sooner we take Blake out of the starting lineup and get in Miller as the PG. Miller is a fast break guard and one of if not the best upcourt passers in the league. Once you start running it becomes infectious. I think Blake fits more of Nate’s style of ball control offense. Of course this can be de-railed by arguing with the officials as you point out, but frankly as annoying as it is, yes I freaking despise it, there is some favortism in the NBA and complaining about calls makes them happen. Phil Jackson is living proof. So the next time he flies in the lane and loses the ball and screams he will get that call.
As far as one on one goes, I think again that really comes down to the offense. Its a designed 1-4 set. Its not a great idea and I think EVENTUALLY they will change it up. I would rather see a high pick and pop with LaMarcus with Greg on the block, Rudy hiding in the corner and miller cutting to the hoop and setting a backpick for rudy on the other side if he doesnt get it.. but again thats just me. One thing you have to remember is that appreciating Roy’s passing is a function of his one on one. Other teams are scared of it, and they double, that leaves players open for drive and kick or drive and drop to the big men. If he didn’t do it often, they wouldn’t likely doubleteam and then no one is open. Ever see Blake drive? Wonder why he has so much trouble passing from it? No one doubles, cuz no one is scared of him.
I understand the criticisms on defense. I do. Roy frankly is just a mediocre defender. But he will get better. Almost all of defense is effort. And expending so much energy on the other end makes it hard to be a good defender. Unless you are freakishly large like LeBron, being a great scorer and great defender don’t usually go hand in hand. Occasionally a player will be great at both but I cant even think of one since Jordan. So understand that its a work in progress. We expect all first team NBA stuff out of Roy but this is only his 4th year in the league. I am happy with him thus far as we should all be.
My concerns are really with the offense and how its structured. It should not be focused on Roy, he should just take over when need be. Although he is not persona gratis #1 around here, Phil Jackson runs the triangle offense. Regardless of his players, he doesnt change the offense. He runs it knowing that when things get stagnant or time is running down, his superstars will know when to break that offense and get a shot off or get to the line. Nate needs to trust that Brandon can do this and stop with the 1-4 offense. Keep it simple.
Interesting post though.
by GreatOden'sRaven on Nov 20, 2009 12:25 PM PST reply actions
I imagine if he stressed that people need to cut to the hoop, it would create more layups but also cause some confusion in the lane (especially in a 1-4 set, in which is it nearly impossible).
Did you read this article?
http://blog.oregonlive.com/behindblazersbeat/2009/11/blazers_have_a_ploy_to_give_br.html
It was a subtle and early evolution of this year’s Blazers: McMillan was beginning to implement a new wrinkle to the team’s attack — a series of isolation (or “ice”) plays for Roy.
The idea is to make the Blazers’ halfcourt offense more varied. With Roy, the Blazers had become so pick-and-roll dominated that they became predictable. Teams would routinely trap Roy in an effort to force him to either retreat from penetration or pass.
“They aren’t even hesitating,” McMillan said of the traps. “So we have to give him some space and let him operate.”
Now, with the “ice” series, Roy will get the ball in different areas of the court and instead of having either Greg Oden or LaMarcus Aldridge come and set a screen for him, the entire Blazers team will clear out the middle of the court. This allows Roy to break down his man.
“Throughout the whole season you have to use new stuff,” Blake said. “Teams get used to what you are running so you have to throw new stuff in there. That’s what this is: Brandon can pretty much beat most of the guys in the NBA 1-on-1, and this is just a way of us to take advantage of that.”
The Blazers worked on the new sets during Thursday’s practice in New Orleans, but Roy said it’s unlikely the team will use the plays heavily tonight against the Hornets. But by midseason, the idea is to have the option of either a Roy isolation or Roy coming off a pick-and-roll, whereas last year the Blazers almost exclusively ran pick and rolls.
“I like the opportunity of it,” Roy said. “This is a new wrinkle; we can mix it up. Teams won’t be just getting a heavy dose of one thing.”
Basically, we are saying we are open to the idea of letting me go one-on-one more. We’re just not screening as much."
The plays are not designed to enhance Roy’s game specifically. In fact, the idea came from a play earlier this season when Roy found himself isolated in front of the Blazers’ bench during a home game against Minnesota. With Roy preparing to breakdown his man, Aldridge cut through the middle of the lane. Roy hit him with a pass and Aldridge scored while being fouled.
The idea, then, is for the isolation plays to spread out the defense to allow Roy more room, while also creating lanes for Aldridge or Oden to flash through the lane.
“Basically, we are saying we are open to the idea of letting me go one-on-one more,” Roy said. “And hopefully this helps the team out, especially with Greg or LaMarcus cutting. It can get us easier baskets.”
Interestingly, the new isolation plays are a throwback to Roy’s second season. At that time, however, McMillan scrapped the plays because he felt it killed the team’s movement because everyone cleared out and watched Roy go to work.
That’s when he started putting the ball in Roy’s hands more and started calling heavy amounts of pick-and-roll sets to get more people moving.
But now, with an older and more savvy team, McMillan feels Aldridge and Oden can read the spacing and make better cuts. Also, he has given Roy the freedom to call for a pick off an isolation.
When reached 40 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!
Cant say I agree with their synapsis
and I had not read it. I guess we will see. the point of the pick and roll comment was that MORE than one person did something. As it is now, when the 1-4 pick comes, the other 3 stand still.
by GreatOden'sRaven on Nov 20, 2009 5:54 PM PST up reply actions
Nate needs to trust that Brandon can do this and stop with the 1-4 offense. Keep it simple.
You can’t “keep it much simpler” than a 1-4 offense
When reached 40 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!
its also not particularly hard to stop…
double team. if everyone stands still and no one cuts.
by GreatOden'sRaven on Nov 20, 2009 5:53 PM PST up reply actions
Being disquieted about Brandon Roy is sort of like ...
… worrying what winning $100 million in Powerball is going to do to your tax bracket.
Regarding the first set of bullet points:
Roy has to have the ball in his hands – that is not unusual with the best player on any team.
Roy talks to the officials about a no-call instead of getting back on defense – this one might bother me some, but I’d like to see some real evidence that it happens frequently enough to be a problem. It’s been my observation that he usually does this after play has stopped. And I’d rather have one of my guys talking to the refs in a low key and professional manner so that later in the game we get a call, then yelling and scowling at them.
Roy walks the ball up the court – don’t have a problem with this. I see it as part of what goes into Portland’s ability to control pace and their excellent offensive efficency numbers.
Roy doesn’t run the fast break – see above
Roy doesn’t play off the ball well – I don’t see proof of that. The fact that he doesn’t play off the ball that much is not the same as saying he can’t.
Roy can’t play with Miller (people don’t say that much any more) – you answerd this one yourself.
Roy can’t play with Rudy – not true. Others here have shown that Portland’s best unit ncludes Roy and Rudy.
Roy can’t play with Sergio – who cares? Sergio is not on the team (and can’t get playing time on the team he is on.)
Roy can’t play defense; Roy doesn’t try on defense – Roy has demonstrated that he can play defense. As for how much effort he puts in, some of that has to do with tradeoffs. How many times do we see the statement that one way to keep at great offensive player from killing you is to make him work on defense? Granted, I would love it if Brandon averaged 26 per game and was named to the 1st team All Defense. But I don’t consider that to be a must see requirement. Besides, Portland has one of the best defensive rankings in the league right now. That tells me he’s not a lousy defender or not putting forth any effort.
Roy plays too much one on one – I don’t see that mattering as long as he produces.
I doubt you would find many people who would argue that Brandon Roy has no room for improvement. The guy who would argue the hardest that he does is Brandon. But his still having facets of his game that need to improve should not be cause for disquiet.
hakkaa päälle !
by timg56 on Nov 20, 2009 12:40 PM PST reply actions 2 recs
I like your analogy.
Being disquieted about Brandon Roy is sort of like… worrying what winning $100 million in Powerball is going to do to your tax bracket.
We should be so lucky!
we are!
that’s what’s so awesome about it. I mean, c’mon, we’re 9-4 there are still 69 games to be played. the haters (for Roy, Nate, Oden, Dre) can come back when we’re hovering at .500 in February.
are you high?
Is it heresy? Can anyone even say these things without getting stoned?
evidentally
In order to rule upon this matter, I submit the following for evidence:
Roy can’t play with Sergio
Roy has scored over half his points “unassisted” in five of those games:
9 to 5 (Denver) L
15 to 4 (San Antonio) W
8 to 3 (New Orleans) W
16 to 3 (Charlotte) W
8 to 7 (Altanta) L
Does this promote stagnant offense? Is this appropriate for your superstar? I’ll be frank: I was surprised that it was only five games. I thought it would be more. Perhaps I have inhuman expectations of Roy.
youre last bullet point
etc.
LOL
verdict: yes you are high
-Sophia
The Princess of Blazersedge
It just takes an iron fist to keep the riff raff under control and her princess hand is mad strong- Idoltime
No
He is a terrible teammate. he makes everyone around him worse. He is selfish and spoke out against the team when he did not immediately get the contract he wanted. Last season was a fluke, and I highly doubt he will be an All Star this season. Portland is better off Roy-less.
"The difference between a democracy and a dictatorship is that in a democracy you vote first and take orders later; in a dictatorship you don't have to waste your time voting"
"I don't like jail, they got the wrong kind of bars in there"
Charles Bukowski
I want to know why Brandon isn't married yet.
If he doesn’t play the right way at home, chances are he won’t at work, either.
by CatMan2 on Nov 20, 2009 5:44 PM PST reply actions 1 recs
shell fish by the sea shore are selfish.
The Faith don't panic, the faith freaks out, burns out farms, and torchs small villages in the name of The Faith.
or this one....
The Faith don't panic, the faith freaks out, burns out farms, and torchs small villages in the name of The Faith.
no he's not.
trade him to the Warriors.
-Warriors fan
He's certainly not showing s he is...
I agree 100% with this post…
If BRoy was a true team leader, he:
a) would have embraced the new guy, and worked from Day One to ensure that the team maximized the value from Dre’s arrival.
b) would not have stated publicly that he prefers one player (Blake) over another…
c) would have done as he said this summer, and really worked on learning how to move well without the ball
d) would have done as he said this summer, and focused on defense… (which he can’t do when he’s so focused on offense… a/k/a “Roy needs the ball”…
a) Who’s to say he didn’t embrace Dre? Besides, it’s coach’s job to maximize Dre.
b) He prefers Blake because he had good success with Blake over several years. He had not worked with Dre.
c) Try practicing moving without the ball – without your team being there. Technically, riding one’s bike is moving without the ball.
d) There’s practicing defense, and there’s playing defense. If the complaint is that he doesn’t give it his all, I doubt working on it in the summer would make much difference.
I’m amazed how quickly some fans will jump ship because of a few early games. Brandon has had a slow start and the team is a bit out of sorts, but he’s stil the same player we loved last year.
Ummm...
Who’s to say he didn’t embrace Dre?
Did you not read his quote that “I prefer playing with Blake”? I suppose you could say that was embracing Dre, in a headlock sort of way…
And obviously, you have to learn to move without the ball within the context of the team…. but I suspect his learning curve would be lower if he tried to learn it beside a point guard who knew how to pass…
And about the D… he said all the right things in the summer… but it sure hasn’t shown up on the court this fall..

by 



















