Game 11 Preview: Blazers vs. Bobcats
Game Time: 4:00 Pacific TV: Comcast and NBATV
We won't try to sell the Bobcats as a good team because they really haven't been. Their 3-5 start this season is typical of their success level. But they've been good against Portland, especially at home, and that's enough. Charlotte has some nice individual talent and the kind of energy that gives the Blazers fits. It's like Portland comes in expecting a slightly sub-par team and gets jabbed in the face, stumbles, and eventually is overcome. Hopefully, road-weary as they undoubtedly are, the Blazers will come loaded for bear and not squirrel tonight, ready to match energy with energy.
Small forward Gerald Wallace leads Charlotte's attack and he's been particularly problematic for the Blazers over the years. He's never been a good jump shooter. When he's clicking he spends most of his time blitzing up and down the court trying to get the ball into the lane and finish strong. Even though the whole league knows what he's up to, he succeeds. He's just got the knack. Plus this year he's providing 12 rebounds a game, bolstered by 20- and 18- rebound performances late last month against the Nets and Hawks. Unsurprisingly he also generates steals and free throws, hallmarks of aggression. He's the kind of player who is no threat when you have him locked up but as soon as he's loose you might as well run for the hills because your bases are belonging to him.
Charlotte has surrounded Wallace with experienced, heady players, a little short on the offensive end but good game technicians and rebounders. Raja Bell doesn't seem like much until you see him handcuff Brandon Roy one-on-one. He can hit a three off of the check-down pass and he's capable of finding the open man himself. Power forward Boris Diaw is a fine all-around contributor who will take whatever you give him without giving you mistakes back in return. Raymond Felton is a point guard who likes to score (with mixed results, especially this year) but also racks up the assist numbers. He's not someone you'd hang your hat on but he can bust out with the big game.
Over the summer the Bobcats swapped franchise-level draftee Emeka Okafor to the Hornets for Tyson Chandler. Despite posting some decent rebounding numbers Chandler's effectiveness has been limited so far, partially from foul trouble and partially because of a non-existent offensive game. With Wallace the only superstar-potential scorer on the team and him needing to run to be at his best the Bobcats can't afford a no-show from any of their other offensive players. You don't have to give them 20 points but you better be able to give them 12. Chandler's around 6.8 right now.
For the most part the bench players mirror the rest of the team: experienced but two-dimensional. You know the names Flip Murray (slasher), Vladimir Radmanovic (shooter), Nazr Mohammed (rebounder), Stephen Graham (energy guy), and DeSagana Diop (requisite out-of-shape player in Larry Brown's doghouse). All of these guys have been elsewhere. All have been passed on. It's like you tried to build a bench that would neither fail nor succeed. That's great if you have a starting lineup like Boston's. It's not so good when your first five give you maybe 55 points combined. You need a spark off the bench. It's just not here.
The best hope for that spark comes from second-year point guard D.J. Augustin. He started the year like gangbusters but lately has just looked like a buster, posting 7 points and 5 assists in his last three games combined. He's speedy but he has trouble defending. He's also a point guard without a lot of clear options to pass to.
The Bobcats hold their opponents to 89.6 points per game, which looks pretty good until you realize that they only score 83.5 points themselves. The Golden State Warriors score that many by accident. They play at a glacial pace and are the only team scoring fewer fast-break points per game than the Blazers. Even so they turn the ball over enough to make the vein in Larry Brown's forehead bulge. Slow pace and high turnovers is a toxic combination. They are good rebounders, especially at the offensive end. This helps make up for their poor shooting. And by "poor" we mean "unacceptable". Their main offensive advantage comes at the free throw line, where they gain around 4 points on the opposition. It's not enough.
Pivotal Points of the Game
1. For the most part if you keep Wallace down you keep the Bobcats down. He's had 15 or more rebounds every time they've won this season. They've also won both times he's scored 18 or more. Most of that offensive damage was from the foul line. He's shooting in putrid fashion this year. So...keep crash off of the boards and off of the foul line and you'll probably win.
2. The Blazers have made good rebounding teams look inferior this year and they need to do so tonight.
3. Pack the middle. Every once in a while Diaw or Felton will get hot but for the most part the Bobcats aren't distance shooters. The only significant exception is Bell, whom you don't leave open.
4. Somebody other than Brandon is going to have to score tonight. It's time for the Websters, Outlaws, and Fernandezeses of the world to step up.
5. They like to generate extra offense by turning you over. Take care of the ball.
Final Thoughts
Be sure to visit one of my favorite blogs, RufusonFire.
Here's ye old Jersey Contest form for tonight's game: Jersey Contest form
--Dave (blazersub@yahoo.com)
0 recs |
75 comments
| Add comment
|
Comments
This is a lousy team to get on the second of a back to back
The game is probably going to be slow and ugly and if it holds to script, Wallace is going to be attacking our interior all night long which spells trouble because Brandon isn’t strong enough to defend him and the rest of the interior defense is already a little foul prone to start the season.
Hopefully all those missed shots in NOLA will end up discovered in the Charlotte airport lost and found and the team will actually be able to hit a jumper tomorrow night … if not, I don’t expect Roy to be able to shake Bell all that well, which means other guys need to step up big time.
oof.
by nikolokolus on Nov 13, 2009 11:41 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Start Joel
And have him give Chandler a good hard foul in the first minute. Chandler will go nuts and get thrown out like he always does when playing Joel, and Greg will feast all night long.
"Woulda, Coulda, Mighta and Shoulda – the Four Horsemen of the Procrastocalypse" - Red-5
by jscot on Nov 13, 2009 11:45 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
It's a THROWDOWN!
"I'm a man, but I can change.....if I have to......I guess." - Red Green
by antediluvian on Nov 14, 2009 10:31 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I like it! I like it!
Of course with our luck Violet Palmer will be officiating and she doesn’t need any help racking up fouls on our centers.
Blazer's Edge Ambassador to The Dream Shake Blog
LMA Rocks!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I <3 LMA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
LMA - Putting the POWER in POWER FORWARD!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
The concussion must have jarred him into "Destroy All Opposition Terminator Mode!" - BlazersOrBust
29:20 Mins, 10-19 FGs, +14, 4 Off, 13 Rebs, 1 Ast, 1 Stl, 20 points!!!! LMA vs David West 11-13-09
by LaMarvelous on Nov 14, 2009 2:26 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
It'll be interesting to see how long the 3 guard lineup lasts
before Webster is put in to match up with Gerald Wallace.
Meanwhile, Roy often bounces back from a poor offensive game, whether or not he’s being guarded by a Raja Bell.
ignacio
by ignacio on Nov 14, 2009 12:13 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
This is the first game where I'm legitimately worried about the 3 guard line-up.
Roy just isn’t big or strong enough to battle Gerald Wallace on the defensive end.
I think Webster should start and take his lumps against Wallace.
"Ain't nothin' in this world for free."
by Arby on Nov 14, 2009 12:15 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
We might actually see Brown match
by using more Augustine.
Also the lineup has been adjustable. It’s not like Nate plays all three guys for 35 minutes together.
—Dave
by Dave on Nov 14, 2009 12:20 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Haven't you heard, Dave?
You’re supposed to be all doom-and-gloom after every Blazers win, because clearly the 3 guard lineup isn’t working.
It’s BlazersEdge chic.
by BlazerTag on Nov 14, 2009 12:23 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I hope the three guard starts out faster than they did yesterday.
Because I dont think they will be playing like the Hornets just did.
by lethaldose on Nov 14, 2009 12:28 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Eventually people are going to have to start crediting the Blazer's defense
The team defense has been much improved from last year. Just because they’re not hitting shots doesn’t mean they’re not playing well.
Just keep digging on defense and eventually your shots will fall. That’s how you advance in the playoffs.
by BlazerTag on Nov 14, 2009 12:31 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Well,
I like what I am seeing so far from them defensively. I hope that they keep it up. It is good to watch.
by lethaldose on Nov 14, 2009 12:37 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I'm elated
Greg Oden developing along with the overall Blazer team defense are the two most crucial improvements needed to satisfy their championship aspirations and both are unfolding before our very eyes this season.
by BlazerTag on Nov 14, 2009 12:40 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Yes
I am starting to believe that Greg Oden is finally showing us why we drafted him. He is beginning to learn how to stay on the court also. It is unbelievable what a force he will be for us as he grows.
by lethaldose on Nov 14, 2009 12:46 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
There are actually very few people dooming and glooming after wins right now.
At the same time, it’s still reasonable to be concerned about the current unbalanced starting lineup. Presumably it will be changed before a stretch where the Blazers face a number of playoff-bound teams that would be better prepared to take advantage of it.
by Timmay! on Nov 14, 2009 12:30 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Or the opposite could happen
Maybe the Blazers 3 guard lineup becomes so successful that it revolutionizes the NBA as we know it and soon every coach in the league starts copy-catting it’s success to the point that Nate McMillen is credited as the century’s most brilliant basketball mind.
by BlazerTag on Nov 14, 2009 12:34 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah...you ever think about that???
well did ya??
(jk)
"And in the end
The love you take
Is equal to the love you make." -The Beatles
by 92wastheyear on Nov 14, 2009 9:41 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I'm not really fond
of people making generalities about other people’s comments, be they celebratory comments or concerns. I don’t think the three-guard lineup will last either. The league is going to catch up with it soon. People have permission to state their opinion on that. People also have permission to be happy about the wins and optimistic about the future. However a person chooses to express themselves they shouldn’t be put down.
Also it’s poor form to label something as “Blazersedge”-ish when just about any opinion can be found and expressed here by some people but no opinion is held by all of us here. You know what’s Blazersedge chic? Sending kids to Blazer games who otherwise can’t go. Good reviews and analysis. People discovering a home to talk about the Blazers. Quotes from people inside that locker room printed here. Connections with other media sources. That’s what Blazersedge is about.
This is not directed at you, BT. I’m just weary of hearing this kind of thing in general. There’s too much judgment, biting sarcasm, people seemingly looking for reasons to be annoyed instead of enjoying each other. It’s not everybody…not even close to a majority…maybe 5-10%. But we need to channel that 5-10% back into talking about the games rather than talking about each other.
—Dave
by Dave on Nov 14, 2009 1:40 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Sorry for the smart-alecry
I know I have the luxury of not having to take this site as seriously as you, but I find that part of enjoying one another is a friendly ribbing from time to time.
I mean to be a gentle josher, not a biting sarcastic judge who’s looking to be annoyed.
I know you said this wasn’t directed at me, but at the very least it was my comment that inspired this keyboard-lashing.
Geez-ums, Dave. I feel like I’ve just been asked to go fetch a switch.
by BlazerTag on Nov 14, 2009 2:48 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Furthermore,
when the Blazers for example, lose a few games in a row and the majority (or so it seems) of posters here begin immediately and harshly trashing the team, coach, GM etc., I personally would like to see them called out a bit as it can get awfully tiring.
Brandon Roy just destroyed everything in his path. There's your rational analysis -- Dave
Also: COMCAST SUCKS!
by TwoDeep on Nov 14, 2009 6:40 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
the problem is that minority opinions
inevitably draws responses of the type Dave refers to. Mockery is a shortcut to censorship.
by blacknoiseNW on Nov 14, 2009 11:11 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Geez-ums, Dave. I feel like I’ve just been asked to go fetch a switch.
Usually you pay double for that kind of action.
"My shoulder is OK. And away we go." -- Nic Batum
"wang-dang diddly wubba SPROING wow-wow" -- Dave
by DonkeyShins on Nov 14, 2009 11:25 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I'd have Roy guard him and then just provide help...
Wallace is rocking 0.8 assists per game and has had a ton of his shots blocked. He’s not really an expert of making you pay for the double team, nor are there a lot skilled scorers able to make you pay.
The only way Wallace can dominate Roy is if the Blazers allow it.
by PoliSam on Nov 14, 2009 11:51 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Gerald Wallace will eat Brandon Roy alive if we try the three guard lineup. It will be ugly.
free bayless
by Cablinasian on Nov 14, 2009 12:26 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
Only if B Roy doesn't torch him on the other end
I’m not too worried about it, honestly. It’s not like Roy plays lock-down defense on a nightly basis.
by BlazerTag on Nov 14, 2009 12:29 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Unless he doesn't
"Woulda, Coulda, Mighta and Shoulda – the Four Horsemen of the Procrastocalypse" - Red-5
by jscot on Nov 14, 2009 2:32 AM PST up reply actions 2 recs
Despite getting to the free throw line at a high rate and shooting a decent percentage once there,
Gerald Wallace has been very inefficient on offense. His FG% is 35.0%…which is basically his eFG% (35.4%) because he’s only made 1 of 10 3 point shots for the season. His TS% is a lousy 44.1% so far, which leads to his stellar PER of 11.4. His 3.5% assist rate (bad even given his teammates) and his 16.0% turnover rate…
The only things Wallace is doing well right now are rebounding (though the major chunk of that is the defensive boards rather than the offensive boards) and steals. These are mainly defensive areas.
Of course, regression to the mean says that Wallace will pick it up over the season big time, but so far he has simply been bad on offense.
by poster on Nov 14, 2009 5:23 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
charlotte seems like
if u built a team with only role players(excluding crash of course who to me seems like more of a b-level star), who thought that would be a good idea?
I'm just coolin'
by HD on Nov 14, 2009 1:09 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
I don't know
but somebody should retire his number.
—Dave
by Dave on Nov 14, 2009 1:41 AM PST up reply actions 1 recs
Hee Hee!! rec
Blazer's Edge Ambassador to The Dream Shake Blog
LMA Rocks!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I <3 LMA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
LMA - Putting the POWER in POWER FORWARD!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
The concussion must have jarred him into "Destroy All Opposition Terminator Mode!" - BlazersOrBust
29:20 Mins, 10-19 FGs, +14, 4 Off, 13 Rebs, 1 Ast, 1 Stl, 20 points!!!! LMA vs David West 11-13-09
by LaMarvelous on Nov 14, 2009 2:32 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Rudy's performance has been criticized so far this year, but ...
Rudy who started out shooting so poorly this season, now (after 10 games) has a higher overall shooting percentage (43.4%) and a higher 3-pt shooting percentage (40.6%) than
Roy (43.0%, 33.3%),
Webster (39.1%, 34.4%),
Outlaw (37.6%, 38.7%),
Blake (38.2%, 39.0%),
Miller (38.9%, 18.2% – ghastly)
Rudy is also now shooting a better overall percentage and a better 3-pt percentage than last year (42.5%, 39.9%).
Rudy’s assists, offensive rebounds, defensive rebounds, blocked shots, and steals (all per minute played) are also all higher this year. In fact, his steals have more than doubled per minute.
One negative – his turnovers per minute have almost doubled, and have been 1.7 per game.
So what is down in Rudy’s statistics? His minutes per game. He’s only playing 20.4 minutes vs 25.6 minutes last year, and also his shots per minute, both 2-pt and 3-pt shots.
Not enough minutes and not enough touches make Rudy a dull guy?
by BlazerFanSince1970 on Nov 14, 2009 1:51 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
I don't know
Here’s the thing about Rudy. He’s not been consistent. He’s had some really, really good spells, which help the stats a lot, but he’s had some pretty poor play, too. He just doesn’t seem in the groove this year.
I know the stats are up, but how much of that is because of a couple hot streaks?
"Woulda, Coulda, Mighta and Shoulda – the Four Horsemen of the Procrastocalypse" - Red-5
by jscot on Nov 14, 2009 2:35 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
He looked like he was inspired by his Spanish brethren, the Matadors
He played some real, “Ole” defense on that Thorton kid from LSU.
by BlazerTag on Nov 14, 2009 2:50 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I think this has been the real issue.
Rudy’s defense has been really off so far. While he’s second in the league in steal rate, the team has been far worse on defense with Rudy in…and this is from oncourt/offcourt stats rather than any naked eye test. Rudy and Outlaw simply looked really bad at defense last night, and I’ve never been one to bash Rudy or Outlaw’s defense since I think they’re a lot better there than a lot of people give them credit for.
by poster on Nov 14, 2009 5:30 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I'm a big Rudy fan
but his off-ball defense doesn’t pass the eye test, either. Brutal.
by blacknoiseNW on Nov 14, 2009 11:12 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I agree his shooting performance has not been as level this year as last
As I said he got off to a really slow start shooting but obviously his percentages are up now on virtually the same number of total 3-pt attempts as Outlaw or Webster for instance. I think he just needs consistent playing time now and he needs to get the ball when he is open. He appears terribly frustrated with his minutes getting jerked around each game and not getting passes when he is open.
I’ve been in favor of waiting till this summer to decide what to do with him, but if he doesn’t start getting more consistent playing time I suspect he is going to be talking to KP about leaving, He expected his role to increase, not decrease this year. I think he has a get out of jail free card signed by Paul Allen and won’t wait too long to use it.
by BlazerFanSince1970 on Nov 14, 2009 3:04 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
The thing is
Nate said he was going to find minutes for Rudy, and he’s gone the opposite way. I’d be feeling pretty annoyed if I were Rudy right now.
It’s early, though.
"Woulda, Coulda, Mighta and Shoulda – the Four Horsemen of the Procrastocalypse" - Red-5
by jscot on Nov 14, 2009 3:21 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Exactly
Blake and Miller are both averaging 28 minutes so that is using 8 minutes at the 2 guard, while Rudy averages only 20 minutes and falling. Plus Bayless is getting 10 minutes the last 5 games. So that also cuts into Rudy and Webster’s time. I also wanted to see what Webster could do this year while Batum was out. Bayless can wait. He isn’t going anywhere and he isn’t going to be replacing Miller or Blake this year. Either Nate has to go back to a 9 player rotation or KP has to start pruning the roster before trouble erupts.
by BlazerFanSince1970 on Nov 14, 2009 3:57 AM PST up reply actions 1 recs
Well, no
We could
1) Not play anyone more than 33 minutes.
2) Quit playing Travis at the 3 at all.
3) Quit playing Blake more than 25 mpg max (I’d prefer 20-22).
4) Not play Miller more than 30 mpg.
That would provide a few minutes for Jerryd and still get more PT for Rudy and Martell.
"Woulda, Coulda, Mighta and Shoulda – the Four Horsemen of the Procrastocalypse" - Red-5
by jscot on Nov 14, 2009 5:49 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
We could, but ...
I don’t believe Nate will.
1) Roy is averaging 35.7 and I will bet that goes up closer to 37. Nate said he wanted Brandon at 35.
2) We (and Rudy) can only dream, but Nate never seems to tire of Outlaw’s wild shots.
3) I had Blake figured for about 20 minutes a game before the season started, but Nate loves him. Nate was using Blake in a 3 guard offense to get him more minutes even before he started using that offense to start games.
4) I had Miller getting about 28 minutes, but he’s getting even more than that since he’s been starting.
So I’m for 2,3,4 (I like Roy with 35-36 minutes) but Nate seems to have other priorities. Hence my belief that KP has to solve this problem, but we will see.
by BlazerFanSince1970 on Nov 14, 2009 10:16 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Plus one and rec.
Brandon Roy just destroyed everything in his path. There's your rational analysis -- Dave
Also: COMCAST SUCKS!
by TwoDeep on Nov 14, 2009 6:45 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
IMHO, backed by the stats, the player who should wait is Blake
Obviously the stats are very preliminary caveat, caveat, caveat, ……but Bayless has been far, far more effective than Blake. Blake has a PER of 8, which is lower than Bayless rookie PER last year. Meanwhile, Bayless has been scoring at the highest rate per minute on the team, has a per of 20.6, and has even been generating assists at a much higher rate than either Blake or Rudy.
Why should Bayless wait when he has been our most effective and efficient bench scorer? I think Rudy and Martell should both be getting more minutes, but Bayless has been more efficient than either Rudy or Martell. The player who needs to sit is Steve Blake.
by upper left corner on Nov 14, 2009 6:56 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I should add - no one on the team has been consistent this year,
not Roy (several poor shooting games), not Blake (very slow start in shooting and turnovers), not Webster (poor defensive effort in several games), not LMA, certainly not Outlaw (2 games in a row early he went 1-8 both games, and now he is 7-28 in the last 3 games), etc etc. I think Rudy just started off poorly, like Blake, and hence they were cut less slack for their inconsistency. All year long, we have won because only a couple of guys played well in each game.
by BlazerFanSince1970 on Nov 14, 2009 3:20 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I think we're still seeing
Nate tinker with the lineups and minutes allocation. We’re all of 10 games into the season,
It would not surprise me if Nate is possibly keeping Rudy’s minutes down early in the season due to his playing a heavy schedule in the off season. Nate does seem to be aware of the toll that the long season has on his players.
But then again, maybe not.
"I'm a man, but I can change.....if I have to......I guess." - Red Green
by antediluvian on Nov 14, 2009 10:39 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
WAIT A MINUTE!
Didn’t we just play against Charlotte last night?
"Woulda, Coulda, Mighta and Shoulda – the Four Horsemen of the Procrastocalypse" - Red-5
by jscot on Nov 14, 2009 3:22 AM PST reply actions 1 recs
The 3 guard lineup probably won’t change for the foreseeable future, possibly not until Batum is healthy. And maybe not even then, depending on how successful the 3 guard approach has been and Batums form when he gets healthy.
If the linup starts getting abused in a particular game, Nate will just make an adjustment in that particular game.
Oden wasn’t speaking tongue in cheek when he said, ’’wer’e sticking with it.‘’
The bigs are flourishing under this new approach. And if they are happy and playing well, Nate will be loathe to tamper with the lineup. If you listen to them, it’s obvious that Greg and LA like the idea of two guys (Miller and Blake) actively looking to set them up, as opposed to just one of them.
Roy is brilliant, but it could be strongy argued that Oden and LA are just as important — if not more — to the future success of the Blazers.
by Energy on Nov 14, 2009 5:29 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
I've been making just that argument for quite a while...
Roy is brilliant, but it could be strongy argued that Oden and LA are just as important — if not more — to the future success of the Blazers
I’m just not convinced it’s the 3 guard set that has led to the improved offense. I give the credit first to Andre Miller, and second to Greg Oden (with a major assist to Bayno) and third to Nate for letting Dre run the offense, and for imploring the team to (push it, and to) feed it to the big man.
While Blake does make a few halfway decent entry passes, I’d still rather see Rudy on the court with Dre and Greg. As numerous others have posted, he does everything Blake can do, but better, and he has outstanding court vision.
But, against a team like Charlotte, who has a good defender of Roy (Raja Bell) who will make him work on the offensive end, I wouldn’t also make him guard a good offensive threat (Gerald Wallace). This is the “perfect storm” that should greatly reduce the minutes tonight for RAB (Roy Andre Blake).
by Visionary2 on Nov 14, 2009 8:37 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
you might as well run for the hills because your bases are belonging to him
Great to see Zero Wing still has influence even today. :)
πάτερ, ἄφες αὐτοῖς, οὐ γὰρ οἴδασιν τί ποιοῦσιν.
by T Darkstar on Nov 14, 2009 5:34 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
Somebody set up us the bomb!
I want to hear one of the Mikes say that in a game…
"My shoulder is OK. And away we go." -- Nic Batum
"wang-dang diddly wubba SPROING wow-wow" -- Dave
by DonkeyShins on Nov 14, 2009 11:30 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I believe the key to tonights game is more Andre Miller jumpers
Beautiful to watch
Blazer Fan
by leeroyjenkins on Nov 14, 2009 6:59 AM PST reply actions 1 recs
LOL
succinct. Rec.
"One of the bright spots of the young season has been rookie point guard Jonny Flynn, whose name sounds like he should be the lead character in a Broadway Musical. "What are you doing here, Jonny Flynn?" "Why I'm here to court trouble, and woo a girl, and build the most fantastical contraption the world has ever seen!" -- Dave, Game 7 Blazers versus Timberwolves preview
by BlazersOrBust on Nov 14, 2009 8:16 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
the key to Miller's durability...
is never, ever, jumping.
by WagonBanded on Nov 14, 2009 9:27 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Unless he is supposed to be guarding someone.
Then he closes out way too late, jumps in the air and sails right by his man. I call it “The Flying None” defense.
by BlazerFanSince1970 on Nov 14, 2009 9:59 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
+92
for the obscure sitcom reference/pun (that nobody but me probably got)
"And in the end
The love you take
Is equal to the love you make." -The Beatles
by 92wastheyear on Nov 14, 2009 11:06 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
"nobody but me probably got"
Yer wrong.
XXOO, Corvy
Former sisterbertrille.fangrrrl
by Corvid on Nov 14, 2009 12:08 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
If you are refering to The Flying Nun, I very much old enough to remember how cute Sally Fields was back then.
Blazer's Edge Ambassador to The Dream Shake Blog
LMA Rocks!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I <3 LMA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
LMA - Putting the POWER in POWER FORWARD!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
The concussion must have jarred him into "Destroy All Opposition Terminator Mode!" - BlazersOrBust
29:20 Mins, 10-19 FGs, +14, 4 Off, 13 Rebs, 1 Ast, 1 Stl, 20 points!!!! LMA vs David West 11-13-09
by LaMarvelous on Nov 14, 2009 2:38 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Big Day for Crash Wallace:
Another audition to be a PTB
by broyposse on Nov 14, 2009 9:09 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
the last thing the Blazers need is another go-to player
Wallace would be an excellent role player, but would he be content being a fourth or fifth wheel on a contender?
I certainly wouldn’t give up Batum, for him – and I think Webster is going to be a superb fifth wheel once he consistently squares up the J (close the right shoulder Martell; close the right shoulder!). Webster will do what we need that position to do at a much more reasonable cost.
by blacknoiseNW on Nov 14, 2009 11:20 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Yes he would
I’m not advocating a trade or anything, but have you watched how Wallace play? He’s like the ultimate garbage man/crash test dummy. He’s one of those guys that would crash through the wall if the coach told him to do that. I’ve heard nothing but glowing phrases about him from his teammates and coaches from local or national media. (Yes, i did used to live in NC for a while)
by xedubx on Nov 14, 2009 11:26 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
That's my take too
Wallace looks downright uncomfortable initiating offense, either from the perimeter or the post. He scores in transition and off of misses and usually misses otherwise… What he would bring to the Blazers is a wing that could defend the power-wings of the league, like Kobe (who is now posting up a lot), Carmelo, LeBron, etc… and turn the Blazers into one of the all-time great rebounding teams (and I don’t think that’s an exaggeration).
He might be an offensive liability for his inability to shoot well from outside, however. He’s also probably not going anywhere.
by PoliSam on Nov 14, 2009 11:39 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Crash could be our Buck Williams
Is Johnson still looking to sell the Bobcats? With a pending sale, and Michael Jordan as a minority owner, anything is possible.
MJ seems to want to start fresh, and another team giving them young assets might be enticing enough for them to let go of Crash since he does get injured a lot.
by broyposse on Nov 14, 2009 11:46 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I agree it's possible, which why I commented...
but it’s still not likely.
by PoliSam on Nov 14, 2009 11:47 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah I agree.
If he does get moved, it won’t be to us. Nelly would sure love him instead of Stephen Jackson. But Larry Brown probably feels the same way.
by broyposse on Nov 14, 2009 11:50 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
A Jackson for Wallace trade makes sense on its face
Charlotte needs more scoring. Golden State needs to get rid of Jackson. But, I don’t really know the details of the contracts and Brown’s preferences.
by PoliSam on Nov 14, 2009 11:53 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
That sounds like a bumper sticker
"And in the end
The love you take
Is equal to the love you make." -The Beatles
by 92wastheyear on Nov 14, 2009 11:44 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
This game threatens to be as low-scoring as the last...
Unless Wallace breaks out of his shooting slump and goes for 30+. Seems that the Blazers team defense is too good right now for that to happen. The problem with Wallace as a scoring threat is that he’s the Bobcats only scoring threat and he’s not skilled enough to beat more than one player and he’s not great passing out of the double team, which is probably an understatement because he has 6 assists all season!
by PoliSam on Nov 14, 2009 11:46 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
I agree
tonight could be a game where I fondly recall the sweet shooting and precision offense of late 90s/early 2000s Knicks-Heat matchups.
I hate Comcast
Card carrying member of Team Bayless
I need to stop being so hard on Steve Blake. Even though I'd rather see him as a top 5 backup PG than an undersized starting SG, he's a Bazer, he works hard, he has earned respect.
by blazeraddict on Nov 14, 2009 1:52 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Oden & LMA => Pillars of Hercules
http://boundless.uoregon.edu/cdm4/item_viewer.php?CISOROOT=/wwdl&CISOPTR=507&CISOBOX=1&REC=10
http://www.flickr.com/photos/osucommons/3678850247/
http://www.allposters.com/-sp/Pillars-of-Hercules-Columbia-River-Oregon-Posters_i899298_.htm
"I won't back down." -- Tom Petty
"History is important. If you don't know history it is as if you were born yesterday. And, if you were born yesterday, anybody up there in a position of power can tell you anything, and you have no way of checking up on it." -- Howard Zinn
by MojoMan on Nov 14, 2009 2:57 PM PST reply actions 0 recs

by 
















