over 2 years ago
thomasikehara
38 comments
12 recs |
Comments
Free Bayless
Just wanted to be the first one to say that this year.
by MadBlaze on Oct 31, 2009 8:59 PM PDT reply actions 1 recs
One of the biggest mistakes in signing Miller...
Is we delay the opportunity so see what Bayless can do / delay his growth.
I'm calling for 57 wins this season.
by 123_G.O._RipCity on Nov 1, 2009 2:09 AM PDT up reply actions
I concur
I am going to have to Nate about this
the NBA: Where Pritchslapping happens
by kevin pritchard on Oct 31, 2009 10:44 PM PDT reply actions
Only for a moment?
Sadly then it is over
"Either way we have two phenomenal units. I'm excited to play with either one." - Martell Webster
I'm far from the fire Nate bandwagon.
So far this year though I’ve been far from impressed with his coaching. He’s too stubborn in his plays and rotations. Let Miller and Aldridge/Rudy/Webster run the break. Give Oden the ball more when it works instead of forcing him to grab a rebound if he wants to score. Tell Brandon and Aldridge to be aggressive and win the game from the inside (paint) out. We are relying far too much on midrange jumpers so far while other teams beat us inside and get our bigs in trouble.
He’s just far too stubborn sometimes, but I’m willing to be a bit more patient. And yes, start Miller. If Blakes going to play bad anyways let Miller and Roy get used to each other during this season starting slump. This is going to be an interesting year that says a lot about the future of the team, lets make it look bright.
And on that note time to go back to celebrating the Ducks win!
DNP - CD Miller
Not really, but seriously starting him would be a bad idea.
I'm calling for 57 wins this season.
by 123_G.O._RipCity on Nov 1, 2009 2:06 AM PDT reply actions
If you want GO...
Starting Miller is the exact RIGHT idea… Unfortunately, with Greg starting and Dre not, we’re not seeing the pick and roll…
Course, I want Rudy on the court too…
Hmm… so this is my new fave starting lineup (while Nic is out): Miller, Rudy, Roy, LMA, Oden.
Start Miller, Rex off the bench, trade Blake.
3.5 ppg. for Blake after 3 games…
Why is he playing again?
"A bizarre and extremely rare hybrid Blazer/Laker fan, Timbo has always struggled to contain the Beast Within, like Dr. Jekyll, Bruce Banner, or Ted Kennedy." — Miled Animal
by timbo on Nov 1, 2009 8:54 AM PDT reply actions 1 recs
Agree 100%.
Maybe Nate thought giving Blake the nod would fill him with confidence, but the opposite has happened—Blake looks totally out-of-sorts on the court, and getting benched early and often will only make things worse for him. Meanwhile Miller has looked far from stellar, but entirely competent, and I would wager giving him the starting nod might add a little more spring to his step. And Bayless in that second unit? Let’s give it a look see. Buh-Bye Blakey.
the poster formerly known as sergioftw, in recovery
Here are a couple reasons not to be concerned with Miller.
- He always starts slow. I don’t know why, but it’s what he does.
- He’s learning a new system.
- He’s coming off the bench for the first time in ten years. That might take some getting used to.
Blake on the other hand…
- Came off a “career” season at 28. Probably more of an outlier than any real indication of future performance. Blake will almost certainly dip back down closer to his mediocre past. I said the same thing about James Jones. When an older guy has a stellar season there’s a very good chance it was a fluke. Not always, but it’s usually the case.
by Nick Van Excellent on Nov 1, 2009 4:00 PM PST up reply actions
Another reason why that expiring contract
has to be looking like good trade bait to KP…
He's proven himself over a longer period of time than 3 games
Many players slump for three games here and there, and are otherwise consistent.
Rushing to judgment can either make you look prophetic or nuts.
I'm a really really ridiculously good looking orange mocha frappaccino drinking manhammer sandwich
That said, I'd like to see what Bayless has
as he was hyped as much as Oden this preseason and I couldn’t see it.
I'm a really really ridiculously good looking orange mocha frappaccino drinking manhammer sandwich
MILLER TIME!
Nate needs to make up his damn mind. Miller is obviesly not happy and rightfully so. It’s almost a insult.
by blazermania92983 on Nov 1, 2009 10:13 PM PST reply actions
Really, he hasn't even outshown Blake this season
He’s been incredibly disappointing. If you can’t dominate the teams 2nd string, why should you start.
He’s better than Blake, but they’ve both sucked enough this year that the question of who starts hasn’t been a factor yet. It may be why Miller’s playing without passion, but that would just show he’s afraid of competition and prove we shouldn’t have signed him.
For the record, I like Miller and I liked the signing. I’m just saying that given the evidence we have for this season, the question of him starting or not isn’t a top concern, as both our PGs have sucked mightily (Blake’s offensive game last night excluded).
I'm a really really ridiculously good looking orange mocha frappaccino drinking manhammer sandwich
Shhh - they don't want to hear facts!
The team is one game better than last year (1-3) at this time. They are integrating two new starters already and a revamped second unit. Miller is playing more minutes than Blake. And we simply need to be patient with the team, the coach and both point guards. If Roy shoots well this team can beat anyone. When he doesn’t even the poor teams can win. That is not on Blake or the lack of Miller, imo. He is going to be fine. When Brandon is on his complete game every other player becomes complimentary. As I see it, Blake is a shooter and Andre is a scorer. There is need for both and both can help Greg in different ways.
"Either way we have two phenomenal units. I'm excited to play with either one." - Martell Webster
i think coming off the bench is a bigger ajustment than people realize.
when you start for 10 years, you may struggle off the bench. Not everyone is travis outlaw
bayless leaves over my dead body
andre miller>hedo, blake
START MILLER
by thomasikehara on Nov 2, 2009 1:13 PM PST reply actions 1 recs
Nice.
Chuck Norris' tears cure cancer. Too bad he has never cried.
by FiveOhThree-RipCity!! on Nov 2, 2009 9:48 PM PST up reply actions
Miller has done little except take the ball to the basket,
which is good, but more valuable when Roy is off the floor (i.e. in a reserve role). He hasn’t run the offense well and hasn’t shot well. He had 2 assists and 0 assists in the last two games. Where are the pick and roles, the lob passes, and the fast breaks he was supposed to provide to “make everyone better”? When he has played at the end of games he hasn’t contributed. in Houston he missed an 18-ft shot and committed an obvious offensive foul trying to force the ball to the basket while Brooks hit a 3 and a 2 to stretch the lead from 2 to 11 and put the game away.
But Miller’s biggest problem has been his defense. He plays worse defense than the mediocre Blake. His trademark so far has been to lose his man and then to jump in the air and sail past him as he fakes or shoots. It’s the “Flying None” defense. With that defense he will be lucky to finish games, let alone start games. He finished the OKC game on the bench for the last t5 minutes.
by BlazerFanSince1970 on Nov 2, 2009 1:49 PM PST reply actions
Maybe Blake starts...
just to boost his value as a (starting PG) in a trade at the beginning of this season? An early trade leaving Miller as PG1 and Bayless finally gets his chance to handle the second team. I’d like to think that Bayless is a better athlete and player than Sergio or Blake, then why didn’t/doesn’t he play.
Give the kid a chance… he’s rotting on the bench!
Wrong
In the three games I’ve watched, Miller has looked awful playing with Brandon. He looks far better with the second unit. Steve Blake hasn’t played great, but he helped us win 54 games last year, and he compliments Brandon’s game much better than Andre. You don’t just take Steve’s job away after a 54 win season. People need to calm down and let the team get going.
"I been ridin' the midnight train, got ice water in my veins." -Bob Dylan
"Sasha? That's a sissy name." -Mike Rice
START MILLER!!!
It’s what he wants and rightfully deserves it over blake. For those who say it’s not who starts but who finishes… finish with him to of course
by blazermania92983 on Nov 4, 2009 7:06 PM PST reply actions
Agreed
Miller should be starting. Look at the stretches he’s played in, that’s when the Blazers have been going on runs.
portlandmenonsports.blogspot.com
by Derek @Portland Men on Sports on Nov 6, 2009 9:04 AM PST up reply actions
Nate needs to quit babying the players
wahhh I want minutes… well this isnt first grade. There are grown men being paid big money. Not like they get less money for not playing. We pay them to be able to use them in a way thats best for the team.
by blazermania92983 on Nov 4, 2009 7:07 PM PST reply actions
Start Miller or trade him
What’s the point of signing a big contract free agent if you’re going to bring him off the bench and give him limited minutes? Miller is a valuable player, and maybe another team could value him more than us.
To be honest I really think we should start Miller and just let him and Roy figure it out as the season goes on. I know they don’t play well together right now, but they are both very intelligent and talented players who want to win. The team probably wouldn’t look less fluid or organized than it does now with Blake starting.
Why do we need Blake's 3-shooting anyway? We've got Rudy and Webby, BRoy and Outlaw
I’m so ready to see Blake grab some bench. Start Miller, Nate.
"I didn't know I was going to score 52 so I didn't think to Tivo it or nothin." -B Roy




















