BODOG.com O/U On ODen, 10.4 PPG, 8.4 RPG
They got the O/U on Oden as 10.4 ppg, or 8.4 RPG....thats almost a cant lose Bet if you go the over...ether way the other Prop bets look interesting for the Blazers as well:
Andre: 14.4 PPG, 6.4 APG
Aldridge: 18.3 PPG, 7.5 RPG
Roy: 22.5 PPG
I think they did a good job with the others, but Oden at 10/8??? I think 12/10 is on the low end for him....hmm....
about 1 month ago
lanepete
14 comments
0 recs |
Comments
how does it work with the two stats?
If you bet the over and split, is the bet a push, or do you lose?
I’d take the over on Oden all day long.
I’d take the under on Miller easily
I think I’d stay away from the LMA and Roy bets though.
How did you guys win that?
"We scored enough points. We scored 107, they scored 105.
-Nate McMillan Postgame, 3/4/2009
by douglast on Oct 23, 2009 10:06 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
its separate prop bets....
So u just do one on the PPG and one on RPG…
Min. 20 games…
Rip City Baby...People have no idea what is coming.
Follow my twitter www.twitter.com/PDXBlazersFTW, @PDXBlazersFTW. Lots of random Blazer Posts from links I find around the blogosphere.
by lanepete on Oct 23, 2009 10:11 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
in that case
over on Oden’s PPG, and bet as much as you can afford. I’d probably do the same on the RPG.
I’d go heavy under on Miller’s PPG, but maybe not so heavy on the assists, though I still think he’ll be under
I still don’t like any of the Roy or LMA bets
How did you guys win that?
"We scored enough points. We scored 107, they scored 105.
-Nate McMillan Postgame, 3/4/2009
by douglast on Oct 23, 2009 10:17 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
u really dont think Andre can get 14 a game?
Rip City Baby...People have no idea what is coming.
Follow my twitter www.twitter.com/PDXBlazersFTW, @PDXBlazersFTW. Lots of random Blazer Posts from links I find around the blogosphere.
by lanepete on Oct 23, 2009 10:18 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
CAN: absolutely; WILL, on this roster at our pace? no way in heck
How did you guys win that?
"We scored enough points. We scored 107, they scored 105.
-Nate McMillan Postgame, 3/4/2009
by douglast on Oct 23, 2009 12:51 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
and yeah, Oden all day long......
mean that seems like a no brainer almost.
Rip City Baby...People have no idea what is coming.
Follow my twitter www.twitter.com/PDXBlazersFTW, @PDXBlazersFTW. Lots of random Blazer Posts from links I find around the blogosphere.
by lanepete on Oct 23, 2009 10:13 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Greg – over
Andre – under
Lma – Over
Roy – Under ( but less sure)
by Falcao on Oct 23, 2009 10:07 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
the other ones i thiink they do a great job on
the ODen one just seems like easy $
Rip City Baby...People have no idea what is coming.
Follow my twitter www.twitter.com/PDXBlazersFTW, @PDXBlazersFTW. Lots of random Blazer Posts from links I find around the blogosphere.
by lanepete on Oct 23, 2009 10:12 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I´d bet the under on Andre too
and maybe I will.
I have to control my gambling tendencies.
I should just stick to poker, where I don´t lose money, but this bet looks tempting.
by Falcao on Oct 23, 2009 10:57 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
No way Miller reaches that ppg mark
just breaking it down I see it like this
Roy 23ppg
LMA 18ppg
Oden 15ppg
Batum 5ppg
Blake 6ppg
total from starting unit 67ppg
Miller 10ppg
Rudy 12ppg
Martell 6ppg
Outlaw 7ppg
Joel 2ppg
Total from Bench 37ppg
Total from team 104ppg, which is about 5 more ppg than last years team. Some feel Brandon will score less this year, so even if you take him down to 20ppg, (which is the lowest I see him going) that puts the team at 101ppg. With Miller speeding up the second team adding a few ppg to last years totals is very possible, but miller getting 14ppg on his own would take major injuries to Rudy and Outlaw who should anchor the scoring on the second unit.
Ben II Blazersedge.com || New to Blazers' Edge?
by usmcr3049 on Oct 23, 2009 11:19 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
you made a mistake
you are assuming averyone plays everygame.
by Falcao on Oct 23, 2009 12:42 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
you may be right
infact i would love it if Nate went with only a 9 man rotation, but I think that is very unlikely. These 10 players are too talented to not play every game. As many fans have been saying since this summer, KP needs to thin this roster down, Outlaw, Rudy, Webster, Bayless, (who I didn’t even play in the above prediction) all should be considered available. Unless all 10 of these guys buy in to the playing time they are given by Nate, there will be some unrest, even if the team is winning. We all want to think that these guys are “too nice” to complain but we will see, when Travis avg under 10ppg because he only gets on the court for under 20 mins per game in a contract year you think he will be happy? I know his agent won’t be and he’ll let it be known. It is also hard to believe that Rudy will be happy with the same role he had last year and the same minutes.
I want this to work out, but I just can’t see it happening without someone being traded, even 1 player leaving makes 10-20 mins available for everyeone else to split up.
Ben II Blazersedge.com || New to Blazers' Edge?
by usmcr3049 on Oct 25, 2009 1:31 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Hmmmm. 10 point for Greg MIGHT be right, but 8 boards? Please. The guy got almost 8 last year in 20 minutes.
No way Miller averages 16ppg.
by dario argento on Oct 23, 2009 5:28 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs





















