Would you trade Aldridge for Amare?
I imagine 95% of Blazer fans would say no to this without hesitation, but that doesn't mean it is a bad idea. Put emotion aside for a moment, consider what each player brings to the table, what Portland is lacking, and think about it.
If LMA reaches his full potential, will he ever be as good as or better than Amare Stoudemire is today and will be the next five years? Do you believe that LMA will ever be the physical presence down low to compliment Roy and the outside shooters? Is it more likely, in five years, that LMA will be more like Rasheed and Cliff Robinson and shoot 3-pointers when the team needs a big basket (like recently against Cleveland), or take it to the rim, draw the foul or make the shot?
While LMA is certainly a potential perennial all-star, Stoudemire already is a perennial superstar, able to CONSISTENTLY dominate games. He has shown he can play with other superstars guards (like Roy), including other dominant big men (like Oden will be). He wants out of Phoenix. He can mentor Oden in more ways than one ("I know what it is like to recover from that surgery, bro."). He is the big, bad, I am gonna take no crap from you attitude the Blazers sorely need. He can take pressure off of Oden and Roy.
He won't back down from Garnett, or be in awe of Lebron or Kobe. He brings a bit of the nasty that the Blazers lack, while not destroying the clubhouse. He plays defense better than any Blazer big man. He is a good passer. He is a scorer even when the outside shots aren't falling. He can hit free throws. He gets calls from the refs. He is the type of veteran the Blazers desperately need.
He is only 27, entering his prime, and will be a great player for several more years as the Blazers make their title run with Roy and Oden.
According to the ESPN trade machine, he could be had for LMA and Raef LaFrentz's expiring contract.
What do you think? I am a huge LMA fan, so I don't think this has to happen or should happen, but I think it is more logical than most of you will allow.
1 recs |
76 comments
Comments
The only reason I would say no
Is Amare’s reported attitude. He doesn’t sound like much of a “team first” kind of guy, wants to be the main show in town. Pretty selfish if you ask me, and definitely doesn’t fit the Blazers attitude.
"Respect everyone, fear no one." -TP
by Arby on Jan 22, 2009 10:14 PM PST reply actions 3 recs
True
Valid point, but maybe there is a corelation between nice guys off the court and too nice on the court. Jordan wasn’t a great teammate. It isn’t as if Amare is a bad guy, and it is not clear to me if the recent reports on his attitude or due to his issues with Suns management and nothing more.
by explicator on Jan 22, 2009 10:19 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I disagree...
Jordan was a great teammate, he just wasn’t very nice about it. He knew how to get through to his teammates when they were doing something wrong…Plus, Jordan never complained about other people scoring or stealing his limelight (not that anybody ever did)… but again, don’t confuse intensity with selfishness.
"Respect everyone, fear no one." -TP
by Arby on Jan 23, 2009 9:56 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Really.......
You must have forgot about Jordan punching Steve Kerr in the face!!!!!!
by JmarcL4 on Feb 6, 2009 2:59 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
His attitude isn't great.
Plus I think Aldridge is a better defender.
by Nick Van Excellent on Jan 22, 2009 10:28 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
+1
He would not fit in with the Blazers team concept. Incredible talent, one of the best in the league, but why bring in a guy who won’t be happy and will likely walk the first chance he gets
Jerryd Bayless = Marlo Stanfield
- Early stage Marlo at this point, but Bayless is the emotionless killer new to the game. He will take over, and there will be causalties – it’s just a matter of time.
by blazeraddict on Jan 23, 2009 11:07 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
there's 3 years left
on Stoudemire’s contract
by two4larue on Jan 23, 2009 9:51 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Doesn't
he have a player option for 2010?
Jerryd Bayless = Marlo Stanfield
- Early stage Marlo at this point, but Bayless is the emotionless killer new to the game. He will take over, and there will be causalties – it’s just a matter of time.
by blazeraddict on Jan 24, 2009 12:02 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I voted Maybe
and this is the reason why – thanks Arby. If Amare was a cool guy like LMA, I’d say Yes.
The Oden/Amare combination would be pretty sick (in a good way). – Elgin
I get what I deserve. I deserve what I get. I have it so I deserve it. I deserve
it for I have it. I get what I deserve. What I deserve - what I deserve what
I get. I have it so I deserve. - Gentle Giant
by 22baylor on Jan 23, 2009 2:54 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I was talking over at Bright Side of the Sun
and they would do this trade. You say that he won’t back down to KG, but he just had one of the most pitiful performances of his career against him.
by Cablinasian on Jan 22, 2009 10:18 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Fiar enough, but...
If you are going to judge one on one performances as the only measurement, how has LMA done against Amare over the years?
by explicator on Jan 22, 2009 10:21 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
ummm... you mean the four games they've played?
just wondering.
Greg Oden, where posters happen.
by ratbastird on Jan 23, 2009 11:08 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I'm really shocked that they would do this trade
The Blazers as a whole are far more like my wife than like me in the sense of their physicality on defense.
-Dave
by chrischa on Jan 22, 2009 10:22 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
me 2
The most hated Blazer is like the least hottest supermodel - Sabonis4Ever
by Philthyanimal on Jan 22, 2009 10:27 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
color me surprised as well
"It’s a good ol’ fashioned Rip City beat down!"
by Magnum on Jan 22, 2009 11:06 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
As am I
I’d keep LMA, but I’d expect the suns to like Amare more because he’s their guy.
Greg Oden, where posters happen.
by ratbastird on Jan 23, 2009 11:09 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
BSofSun is not Suns management !
I wouldn’t trade Smooth for Stoudamire for
several reasons.
1. He dosen’t play good D (or try hard in my eyes)
This could be from the Suns system – we outscore U.
2. Wants, needs & demands touches ! We don’t need that
kind of player, since BRoy, Smooth, GO & others are
unselfish and will move the ball. When the Blazers gel,
this will be a unique trait of our team.
3. He’s older and used to a system where he is the Man !
He would impeed a lot of GO’s development in the post.
Smooth can post, face or play pick & roll/pop. More versatile.
4. Smooth is a better open floor defender and trap man, which
will be a big part of our defense when the Blazers come together.
Most importantly, the Suns management will never do this deal.
It’s fantasy, so please return to reality !!!
It's GO time !
by walkoff41 on Jan 23, 2009 11:24 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Why?
To quote myself: “Reality is for those who can’t handle Blazers Edge.”
by MiledAnimal on Jan 23, 2009 12:54 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
BE is a mixture . . .
I represent the reality contingent.
I also represent the patience group
amongst others. It’s a scary position,
but someone has to offset the fantasy
trader crowd !
COINCAST SUCKS !!!! That’s a reality !!!
It's GO time !
by walkoff41 on Jan 23, 2009 2:34 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I like your coincast sucks!!! sign-off.
Did you know you can put that into a signature line that will appear automatically below your comments? That, plus not hitting at the end of each line, would have saved you 47 keystrokes in that comment alone!
by MiledAnimal on Jan 23, 2009 3:16 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
yeah
but you can also point to him dominating Tim Duncan and not many people can say that.
I would probably keep LMA as Amare is not a good defender and LMA has the potential to be really good on that side of the ball.
Life is exhausting when you are this stupid.
by jonestr on Jan 23, 2009 7:59 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Defense brings rings
Amare is a poor defender with a poor tude and will never get one
by southern oregon on Jan 22, 2009 10:18 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
How long do I get Amare for?
He’s only signed for this season and next. That isn’t exactly our window.
by as11osu on Jan 22, 2009 10:18 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
His current contract has two more years, but so does LMA
Using your logic, LMA isn’t part of the window either. Obviously, you make assumptions that certain players are going to be resigned, like Oden and Roy.
by explicator on Jan 22, 2009 10:23 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
big difference
LMA, Oden, and Roy are all on their rookie deals. We can extend them before they become free agents (which virtually EVERY good player has done over the past years), and even if we don’t, we can match any offer they get on the restricted free agent market. Their only “out” would be to play for the qualifying offer in their 5th season, then bolt the next year. name ONE all-star level player, or even a quality starter, who has done that yet? you can’t, because he hasn’t happened.
Amare on the other hand is an unrestricted free agent in 1.5 seasons. he can go wherever he wants.
Rule #1 of nitpicking is to get it right.
by douglast on Jan 22, 2009 10:51 PM PST up reply actions 1 recs
you are correct
my point was KP would not make this trade without signing an extension for Amare, as was brought up by someone below, so I am making assumptions on future extensions.
by explicator on Jan 22, 2009 11:09 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
i think ben gordon
is the only one from memory
by Yawnie on Jan 23, 2009 4:48 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
LMA is not worth Amare
and imho here is why…………Amare is a much better player right now……RIGHT NOW………LMA could end up being just as good as KG. Would you trade KG for Amare? I think not. Dont get me wrong i am not crazy as see LMA right now as a KG type player, he isnt even close but in 2-3 more years he will be and i have no doubt of that. Lets not forget MA has a very unique skill set…….he shoots a high percentage from outside off pick and pops, he runs like a deer, he is getting much better defensively and will be very good if he gives the correct effort, he can post when needed, he blocks shots,plays passing lanes, and rebounds a decent amount given he is 23 and a 3rd year player. Barely 7 boards a game sucks frankly but a steal and a block a game mean he is trying. I have faith his rebounding will improve and so far this year it has(see http://blog.oregonlive.com/behindblazersbeat/2009/01/a_changed_aldridge.html, For proof) amare is much better right now but in 3 years when we are poised for multiple runs at a title we are going to rely heavily on Lamarcus.
by blazerbeliever97504 on Jan 22, 2009 10:35 PM PST reply actions 1 recs
That running hook across the middle is starting to look pretty fine too.
GO
THE TEACHER ......come into my classroom "THE PAINT" for some tutelage.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"The rancor reflected in that remark I won't dignify with comment. But I'll address your general attitude of hopeless negativism." – Everett "O Brother, where art Thou?"
by Blazer1342 on Jan 23, 2009 5:54 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Combined with the Smooth Shake . . .
He’ll be unstoppable on the post. We already
see LaMarcus turn away from the hook for the fade,
but when he starts to approximate the “Dream Shake”
in faking the roll to the hook and then turning to the
baseline for the “Smooth Shake”, then he’ll be a major
threat. The top of the reach fadeaway jumper is unblockable !
It's GO time !
by walkoff41 on Jan 23, 2009 11:29 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I think his rebounding is what it is
as he is not playing a lot in the post on either side of the ball. Not that he is an extremely deficient rebounder it is just that the defense and offense draw him away from being in a position to rebound shots.
I dont know if LMA will ever be KG like as he does not have the ball handling and he has an inside game. KG is a fantastic ball handler, and has never really had much of an inside game.
Life is exhausting when you are this stupid.
by jonestr on Jan 23, 2009 8:04 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
yes
yes yes yes yes yes
myspace.com/marktwainindians
by mark twain on Jan 22, 2009 10:54 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
You all know what I think, but it doesn't matter. What matters is what does KP think...
and I don’t believe for a minute that he would do this deal.
The only way that I am wrong is if Amare agrees to sign a longer contract. There is no way KP would take a chance on having his star PF just walk away after a year and a half.
Blazer's Edge Ambassador to The Dream Shake Blog
by LaMarvelous on Jan 22, 2009 11:03 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Yep, there's no point in renting Amare for a season and a half
"It’s a good ol’ fashioned Rip City beat down!"
by Magnum on Jan 22, 2009 11:08 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Talent-wise and domination-wise
yes.
But a big part of the reason Amare wants out of Phoenix is that they’re playing a slower game based around a very large center who is taking up real estate from him. I don’t see how things change for him here. Obviously Oden isn’t as much of a force as Shaq is right now but sooner or later that battle for the paint would come to a head unless you just flat-out send one of the two outside, thereby taking away the best part of his game.
—Dave
by Dave on Jan 22, 2009 11:08 PM PST reply actions 1 recs
On the bright side
you could call them the Microfracture Maulers.
—Dave
by Dave on Jan 22, 2009 11:08 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
is that really the bright side
we could have kept Zach for that
"It’s a good ol’ fashioned Rip City beat down!"
by Magnum on Jan 22, 2009 11:09 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Come to think of it
with our luck… Game 1 of the Oden/Amare era, Quarter 1: Oden and Stoudemire collide when going for an offensive rebound, smashing knees together. Both are down on the ground writhing in pain. I’m sure it’s only a temporary thing, though. They HAVE to be alright, right?
—Dave
by Dave on Jan 22, 2009 11:10 PM PST up reply actions 1 recs
even worse
They were going after a missed layin by Roy, who is still laying on the ground trying to draw the foul, and the three of them are tangled up. You’ve convinced me; don’t do this trade!
by explicator on Jan 22, 2009 11:12 PM PST up reply actions 1 recs
and then the entire bench gets up and charges the court
because they think it was an extremely dirty play by XXXXXX and everyone gets suspended for the rest of the year. Instead of bringing in 10 D-league players the Blazers just forfeit the season.
"It’s a good ol’ fashioned Rip City beat down!"
by Magnum on Jan 22, 2009 11:46 PM PST up reply actions 1 recs
+1
for amusing Keystone Kops scenario – Elgin
I get what I deserve. I deserve what I get. I have it so I deserve it. I deserve
it for I have it. I get what I deserve. What I deserve - what I deserve what
I get. I have it so I deserve. - Gentle Giant
by 22baylor on Jan 23, 2009 2:57 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
You have to suppress those thoughts !!!
It's GO time !
by walkoff41 on Jan 23, 2009 11:31 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Domination Yes
offensive talent yes
Defensive no
Team willingness no
Potential: Amare has reached his me thinks, Aldridge has more potential (may fail to reach, but he has it)
I stick with Aldridge long term.
Greg Oden, where posters happen.
by ratbastird on Jan 23, 2009 11:12 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
You would have to add at least Sergio to that trade to convince Kerr, if not Bayless
It gets a step price, if Amare decides he doesn’t like it anymore in Portland in 2010 and opts out of his contract.
Bill Simmons had an interesting idea on his podcast, which would be kind of intriguing for both clubs since both are about equally valuable, equally unhappy with their situation and equally likely to bolt in 2010 from their current team: Toronto trades Chris Bosh, Anthony Parker and picks to the Suns for Amare and Barbosa, and does the rumored Jermaine O’Neal for Shawn Marion deal. Then the Raptors could run the old Suns offense with Calderon as Steve Nash :)
by Norsktroll on Jan 22, 2009 11:53 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
those trades make way too much sense
I need more Gasol for ummmm….who?
and
Camby for a 2nd round pick
"It’s a good ol’ fashioned Rip City beat down!"
by Magnum on Jan 22, 2009 11:56 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
That'd be a great team to watch....
Give seven seconds or less another go…
PG: Calderon / Solomon
SG: Barbosa / Graham
SF: Marion / Kopono
PF: Stoudemire / Moon
C: Bargnani / Humphries
by as11osu on Jan 23, 2009 12:42 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Stoudemire and Marion together again.
Yeah, that’ll work!
by MiledAnimal on Jan 23, 2009 9:55 AM PST up reply actions 1 recs
Yes
We could all wear our old Stoudemire jerseys again.
by Sabonis4Ever on Jan 23, 2009 12:40 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
Pretty sure
Stoudamire isn’t Stoudemire
by Cablinasian on Jan 23, 2009 11:38 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
close enough for government work
and NBA work too.
Give him jersey Number 3 for maximum confusion levels and ease of jersey retirement ceremonies. – Elgin
I get what I deserve. I deserve what I get. I have it so I deserve it. I deserve
it for I have it. I get what I deserve. What I deserve - what I deserve what
I get. I have it so I deserve. - Gentle Giant
by 22baylor on Jan 23, 2009 2:59 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Amare is my favorite pf Im glad that offer is just a rant and not real. Bob Whitsett it was said told Phoenix he would agree to any offer they made to aquire Amare in the draft. Fortunatly for Phoenix they passed ,,,,,,
I try to help with everything," Fernandez said. "If the coach says go rebound, I go rebound. I work for the team.
""If I'm playing this game to get media and attention, I shouldn't be here," Aldridge said. "I'm here to play basketball, and do what I can do to help this team win."
by Dragonage on Jan 23, 2009 6:56 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
Talent wise, absolutely, no brainer
attitude wise, HECK NO. He is a selfish diva who whines about “being the man”. Who needs to deal with that?
I'm a little confused by your tactics
by oderiferous emanations 74 on Jan 23, 2009 8:39 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
If you are going to create a fictional trade
You might as well get the better player and trade for Chris Bosh. Better rebounder, defender, attitude. Stoudemire has more offensive potential, but that’s about it. His head isn’t always in the game, and that’s why every season there’s always some rumor that Phoenix will trade Amare.
Vinny Del Negro interviewed for the job today. I mean come on! Nobody else thinks this is nuts?
by Juiceboxjerry on Jun 6, 2008 4:21 PM CDT actions actions 0 recs
by Ozzie Montana on Jan 23, 2009 8:45 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
For me...
A’m’a’r’e’s pros < A’m’a’r’e’s cons
Pros: terrific post player, explosive offensively, good weak side defender
Cons: shoddy man-to-man defender, limited range, diva, underachieving rebounder
He’s a glorified Zach Randolph with hops, but Zach rebounds better and has better range.
IMO, it’s safe to say at this point that we know what to expect from AS. He’s been in the league for 7 years… his game isn’t likely to change much now (except that he’ll lose athleticism as his knees age). LMA has more that we haven’t seen yet. His defense is better and his attitude is way better. LMA might not be able to drop 40+ like Amare does on occasion, but I don’t care so much.
For me, I don’t touch A’m’a’r’e with a ten foot pole if it means swapping LMA for him.
"When I die, I want to go peacefully like my Grandfather did, in his sleep -- not screaming, like the passengers in his car"
by you'vegottomakeyourfreethrows on Jan 23, 2009 9:32 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
i think lamarcus could score 40 on anybody anyday
the reason he doesnt is because i doubt his shot attempts will go up in the future, just his FG% will. too many good shooters means he will be capped at about 15 or so shots per game.
and secondly for some reason the blazers do not go to him enough when hes hot,
by Yawnie on Jan 23, 2009 9:41 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I wish jksnake99 was here to disagree with me.
I know he’d do this trade in a hearbeat.
"When I die, I want to go peacefully like my Grandfather did, in his sleep -- not screaming, like the passengers in his car"
by you'vegottomakeyourfreethrows on Jan 23, 2009 10:08 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
never
and this is not because im a blazer fan.
amare has the potential to be a locker room cancer, at the moment everyone knows the blazers have a great locker room atmosphere, why would we want to affect that.
i think a good locker room is good for a few wins per year, although there is no stat for it
by Yawnie on Jan 23, 2009 9:39 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
No way, Amare's overrated
Plays even worse defense than LaCharmin and is all about mememememe
Blazer Fan
by leeroyjenkins on Jan 23, 2009 9:55 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
i'm really surprised by all the anti-amare fever here
lockerroom cancer..glorified zach randolph (really?)
and if i hear another thing about the power of potential i’m gonna vomit. Amare is a star. Whether or not this is a good idea, he is a superstar and a real good player. LMA has the CHANCE to be as good, or arguably better than him one day. But still, that’s a CHANCE-not a sure thing. We’ve had plenty of people who coulda been great and didn’t pan out, so please ease up on the love of potential!
by nima on Jan 23, 2009 12:00 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
When someone is steadily improving
and has shown not only the desire to improve, but has put in the work to keep improving their game and their body then you should be talking about potential. When it is the case of someone who has a good game here or there (Darius) but has not shown constant and steady improvement, then the “potential” tag is dangerous.
I'm a little confused by your tactics
by oderiferous emanations 74 on Jan 23, 2009 12:13 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
No, because
The ages don’t mesh well.
Our core is 20-24. We depend on four rookies, three of them who are 20.
Our glory years, based on our core, will be from 2010 to 2016. Amare will be too old; his game seems certain to decline when he reaches 30, and drop preciptiously around 32, based on players in the past with similar skills, strengths and bodies.
The Blazers need a power forward with a midrange game, so that the power forward defenders will be afraid to help out on Oden, or will be punished if he does. LMA has that, and it will improve; it’s a strength.
They need a power forward who can block out, keep his man off the offensive boards, and turn the glass over to Oden in a lot of cases. LMA will do this well enough, probably.
They need an aggressive, tough guy who can play playoff basketball—slower, tougher, more physical. That’s not LMA, and might not be him. It’s less than ideal, but we still might win without it because no teams are perfect.
Frankly, they need the old Maurice Lucas.
But there are very few Maurice Lucases. If the Blazers upgrade their play at the small forward, which should happen from experience alone, and at point guard, which could happen with Bayless, Roy, Oden and LMA should be enough for them to play with anyone, and above almost everyone.
by Hulk on Jan 23, 2009 12:18 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Is Shaq + Amare working?
If you answered no, then why would Oden + Amare work any better?
If you answered yes, you’re drunk and need to try answering this question again.
"What's that, some kind of hamburger?"
--Bo Outlaw on being asked how he felt about recording his first triple double.
by prezofdeath on Jan 23, 2009 12:25 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Oden is more spry than Shaq
Of course, a dump truck is more spry than Shaq, but you get the picture.
by EngineerScotty on Jan 23, 2009 1:30 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Amare with Shaq in his prime would have been devastating
Shaq is a shell of what he once was, so I don’t get that comment at all.
by explicator on Jan 23, 2009 8:45 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
LMA on the fast break
Have you noticed how common it is to see LMA at the front of a fast break. There are NO other big men that can streak across the floor in transition like him. That is RAW talent and athleticism, whereas the post play and defense is learned, and will continue to get better.
by 3pointer on Jan 23, 2009 1:01 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
I'll take 'em both
If PHX continues to hit the skids and wants to dump Amare’s contact, KP can offer Frye, Diogu and RLEC at the deadline.
For those who say this would never happen? I have two words
Gasol deal
by two4larue on Jan 23, 2009 10:14 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Main reasons I wouldn't do it :
Amare plays NO defense whatsoever, and he has one of THE HUGEST egos in the league.
by llublazerfan on Jan 31, 2009 1:34 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
And I used to love the guy...
back in the 7 seconds or less era.
by llublazerfan on Jan 31, 2009 1:34 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Plus, LMA is a better rebounder (or is easily close to surpassing Amare)
and I think has the potential to be just as dangerous on offense, if not more.
by llublazerfan on Jan 31, 2009 1:36 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Saying Amare plays defense is like saying Joel is a goot 3pt shooter.
He could be…but you’ll never know because neither of them would ever try.
Seriously do not let blocks fool you, Amare is an absolutely horrible defender.
No thank you.
by Bskey on Feb 4, 2009 3:57 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
L.A. is up, up ,upside......
We know what Amare brings to the table and he’s an all star right now, but no one can argue that L.A. has only bettered his game in each of the years we have had him. He’s a quality guy in the locker room and I don’t think you can say that Amare is a better shooter. I’m just worried that the Blazers tend to make moves prematurely. We take these young guys put in the work to make them NBA players and get rid of them before we can see their full potential. Also didn’t Amare miss an entire season due to a knee injury ? Thats a little scary. Anyways the chances are, if he goes anywhere it’s going to be either Chicago or Detroit. I guess anything is possible when you got K.P. at the helm.
by JmarcL4 on Feb 6, 2009 3:39 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
























