Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Knicks Beat Lakers With Familiar Strategy

Game 41 Preview: Bucks vs. Blazers

It's hard to believe that after this game is complete the season will be half over.  Where does time go?

A Look at the Bucks

Milwaukee comes into this game sporting a 20-23 record.  They actually have a positive point differential and their record may not be as bad as it seems considering they've played 7 more road games than home games thus far.  Their wins have mostly come against average or lower teams but they do have a couple quality wins against the West in their portfolio--two against the Spurs and one against the Jazz to be exact. 

The Bucks are a classic case of Jack of All Trades, master of none.  Sporting a veteran lineup and playing a legitimate 10 deep evens out the otherwise rough spots in the lineup.  Michael Redd and Richard Jefferson are the star players, averaging 21.7 and 17.4 per game respectively.  But Redd is a hot-and-lukewarm gunner who gives you 40 one night and 20 the next.  Neither of those is bad, which is why he's a bona fide star, but you still don't know what you're going to get from him night to night.  Jefferson is steadier but his shooting percentage has taken a precipitous drop since the move to Milwaukee (off 39 points from last season), a reflection of a move towards the perimeter and the lack of running opportunities in the Milwaukee system.  However the Bucks field a rogues gallery of forwards and centers, including Andrew Bogut, Charlie Villanueva, Dan Gadzuric, and the delightfully-named Luc Richard Mbah a Moute.  Between them they handle the rebounding and dirty work so the scorers can produce without worry.  Bogut is out for the road trip, however, leaving a fairly sizable hold in the Milwaukee interior both for rebounding and scoring.

In the backcourt the Bucks employ a tag team of Luke Ridnour and Ramon Sessions alongside Redd.  Both are good passers and decent shooters (though not from range for Sessions) but the defense is suspect.

You wouldn't know any of the Bucks had suspect defense, however, by looking at their overall defensive upswing this year.  Coach Scott Skiles has got them playing gritty and hard on the defensive end.  They've proven themselves more than capable of covering for that spotty backcourt for most of the season.  Their last few games, however, indicate that they may be getting tired of putting in the effort or the league may have figured out how to exploit them.  After a host of 80-point games allowed in late December all of a sudden 7 of their last 9 games have resulted in 100+ points for the opponents.  The Bucks are also starting to get beat on the boards.  They don't have enough offense to cope with that combination.  That's why you see losses to the Timberwolves, Clippers, and Bobcats on their résumé this month.  The story lately has been Michael Redd scoring 30+ to generate wins or him falling south of that total and the Bucks losing.  That's not how their game plan is mapped out.

The Bucks excel at offensive rebounding and forcing turnovers.  They're decent on the defensive boards.  Their basic goal is to limit your possessions, harass you into mistakes, and then get up more shots than you do without opening the game wide up and losing containment in the process.  Rush them, crack their façade, or deny them control of the ball and they're in trouble.

Keys to the Game

1.  This wouldn't have been my first mention three weeks ago but right now it seems like solving Michael Redd solves the Bucks.  You don't even have to hold him in the teens.  Just keep him around 20-22 and make everybody else beat you.

2.  That said, you do have to make sure you score with the Bucks.  To that end our guards need to be quite aggressive.  Exploit, exploit, exploit.

3.  I am putting out the call right now, shining the Bat Signal, setting off the alarm at the Hall of Justice.  Please, please, PLEASE Greg Oden, be there tonight!  Without Bogut the Bucks might as well write you a personalized invitation to dominate the boards, score in the low post, and roam on defense.  Just keep your hands to yourself if you're beat, stay out of foul trouble, and have yourself a merry old time working out the pent-up frustration from all of those other games.  Forget exploit, exploit, exploit.  Exterminate, exterminate, exterminate!

4.  Rebounding is always a key, but I promise it will really extra-specially hamper the Bucks if you take away their preferred rebounding advantage tonight.

5.  One of the important things tonight is executing the offense properly when the first or second option doesn't work.  The Bucks have a way of frazzling you into stupidity.  We're a little vulnerable to that without the regular point guard rotation intact.  If we get a decent shot most of the time even when it's not in Roy's hands we should win this game.  If we hold the ball and barf up bad shots then this could be a long and harrowing night.

Final Thoughts

We play 5 of the next 6 games at home (and the 6th against the Clippers) before embarking on a tough little three-game road trip.  An excellent showing in this stretch would ease the pressure later.  Beating Milwaukee would definitely improve the chances for that excellent showing.  Losing tonight would put a lot of pressure on that Wednesday game versus the Cavaliers.  (I have this weird feeling we're going to win Wednesday, but I'd rather not have to.)

Check out the Bucks' point of view at the cleverly-named BrewHoop.

Enter tonight's Jersey Contest form here.

--Dave (blazersub@yahoo.com)

BallHype: hype it up!

Comment 35 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Milwaukee is a better team than their record...

… but, Portland should needs to win this one at home, particularly with Bogut unavailable. Go Blazers. I would like to see 4-2 (minimum) in our final 6 January games, and really, 5-1 is very much a possibility.

Let’s make it happen.

Boomshakalaka

by jksnake99 on Jan 18, 2009 11:44 PM PST reply actions  

Really, 6-0 is possible

Cleveland is not unbeatable. They have injuries, too.

If we don’t want to lose ground, we need 4-2. I agree that 5-1 would be a good showing. It’s too bad that we have so many injuries just when we hit the part of the schedule where we really need to rack up the wins. Hopefully being at home against weaker competition will help.

Losing at Charlotte does mean we need this one. We needed at least a split out of Philly/NJ, and we needed a split out of Charlotte/Milwaukie. Get this one, and we’re right at the halfway point with 25 wins. Given the injuries we’ve had, that’s really outstanding.

I know you can put admiration in bags, because admiration is real, and tominhawaii says that everything that is real is measurable.

by jscot on Jan 19, 2009 12:07 AM PST up reply actions  

25-16 would be excellent overall

but by the same token we’re 10-10 in our last 20, and we really need to get back to playing .600+ ball.

Boomshakalaka

by jksnake99 on Jan 19, 2009 12:25 AM PST up reply actions  

We need better than that

if we’re going to hit my prediction of 55 wins.

The last 20 have been tough games, and we’ve had injuries as well. But it’s time to get rolling, despite the injuries, or we’ll end up squeaking into the playoffs, or possibly even miss out. No better opportunity to open a gap than the next two weeks.

I know you can put admiration in bags, because admiration is real, and tominhawaii says that everything that is real is measurable.

by jscot on Jan 19, 2009 3:51 AM PST up reply actions  

LOL

And walkoff and usmcr3049 (but I’m afraid he’s going wobbly on us), and probably a few more I’m forgetting.

If we don’t go 5-1 or 6-0 the rest of the month, I’m going to start feeling pretty wobbly, too. I still think 55 is legitimately within reach, but I’d hoped to see a little more progress out of Greg, and to have Martell back by now. We’ll see.

I know you can put admiration in bags, because admiration is real, and tominhawaii says that everything that is real is measurable.

by jscot on Jan 19, 2009 9:49 AM PST up reply actions  

55 is highly unlikely at this point

but we still have a good shot at 50-51.

Boomshakalaka

by jksnake99 on Jan 19, 2009 11:08 AM PST up reply actions  

To get 55

we would have to up our game not just to where it was in the first 20 games, but slightly above that.

If we do that, with the easier schedule, we’ll win bucketloads of games.

I know you can put admiration in bags, because admiration is real, and tominhawaii says that everything that is real is measurable.

by jscot on Jan 19, 2009 11:23 AM PST up reply actions  

Was it Dave who once wrote

that the number of wins are inversely proportional to the number of ifs?

by MiledAnimal on Jan 19, 2009 11:25 AM PST up reply actions  

Inverse proportions

can’t be trusted.

When I was in school, we used to say that intelligence is inversely proportional to good looks.

Then, one day, I looked in the mirror and realized it wasn’t true.

I know you can put admiration in bags, because admiration is real, and tominhawaii says that everything that is real is measurable.

by jscot on Jan 19, 2009 11:29 AM PST up reply actions  

Did you realize that you should be a lot better looking??

Larry (the new Johnnie Cochran) Miller: "If we get screwed, we're gonna sue"

by 92wastheyear on Jan 19, 2009 2:58 PM PST up reply actions  

Why did someone have to say it

when everyone was already thinking it?

I know you can put admiration in bags, because admiration is real, and tominhawaii says that everything that is real is measurable.

by jscot on Jan 19, 2009 11:33 PM PST up reply actions  

the young man really does have a beautiful name

it’s like you never want it to end. luc richard mbah a moute.

my exwife is french, from the walled city of avignon. she could do justice to this name.

ignacio

by ignacio on Jan 19, 2009 1:31 AM PST up reply actions  

in fact i'm going to email her this name right now.

she’s already quite pleased that the blazers have the french presence of batum.

ignacio

by ignacio on Jan 19, 2009 1:36 AM PST up reply actions  

Hadschi Halef Omar Ben Hadschi Abul Abbas Ibn Hadschi Dawud al Gossarah

They just call Mbah A Moute “The Prince” since his father is a chief in his hometown in Cameroon :)

by Norsktroll on Jan 19, 2009 2:15 AM PST up reply actions  

Shav went out there for a workout this summer and I was trying to get him up to speed on who is who

and when I told him there was a Prince from Cameroon (I think) on the team, he thought it was pretty awesome….

If it is Cameroon (which I don’t have tha care time or patience to lookup) he would love our Junk in thr Trunk drawer…The women there dress up for festival by stuffing the skirts as big as possible in the back and parading around showing off the artificially gi-normus derierres…apparently considered a sign of great beauty….perhaps we should just ship off some of our unhappy lard-butts out there where they can get some proper recognition :-)

"..[Travis Outlaw] could jump, grab a rafter, eat a sandwich, and then dunk.."
tmundal 12/30/07

by LetsBlaze on Jan 19, 2009 4:25 AM PST up reply actions  

There's Bucks in the garden . . .

        The Rose Garden that is !
GO Exterminate !! Exterminate !!

Seriously GO, If you get switched onto a
slasher, keep your hands to yourself. Play
off him a little and force him to shoot over the
top !

      COINCAST SUCKS !!!!! GO BLAZERS !!!!

It's GO time !

by walkoff41 on Jan 19, 2009 12:51 AM PST reply actions  

i don't feel like this year's blazers are the team i got to know

now that steve blake is out. that just really adds such a layer of uncertainty and unintended consequences etc (like neither oden nor aldridge or even outlaw getting the ball where they would like.) nothing is the same, and there’s no longer those nice 3 pt shots at 43% everyone had grown used to.

so i don’t know. we need some kind of exorcism after all those missed fts. ‘exorcism’ in this case is precisely the right word.

and as dave said, GO this game is made for you.

ignacio

by ignacio on Jan 19, 2009 1:26 AM PST reply actions  

I thought I was a member of Brewhoop

I like that blog.

I'm a Blazers fan and If you ban me from your blog, I'll sue you!
Please don't feed the trolls.
God forgives, tominhawaii doesn't.

by tominhawaii on Jan 19, 2009 3:02 AM PST reply actions  

Greg you need to come and play great

against the Bucks, but I doubt you will Greg because;

Cause you’re hot then you’re cold,
I yell “YES!” and then yell “NO!”
You’re in and you’re out (becauseoffoultrouble)
You’re up and you’re down
You’re wrong when it’s right,
You’re black and Joel’s white
You foul, we break up,
You dunk, we make up

by neutroticblazerfan on Jan 19, 2009 3:30 AM PST reply actions  

I just heard that song for the first time

(I know…I lead a sheltered life) ….so it is funny you re-wrote it as a GO ditty. Well done

Larry (the new Johnnie Cochran) Miller: "If we get screwed, we're gonna sue"

by 92wastheyear on Jan 19, 2009 10:38 AM PST up reply actions  

Another bullet...

And one that needs to be repeated for every game: As Phizben points out in the sidebar, the Blazers need to keep focus in the first quarter. They are making a (bad) habit of playing catch up.

"I love this game!" -Moonbeam, from 'Rollerball' right before he was knocked into a permanent coma

by -ken on Jan 19, 2009 4:16 AM PST reply actions  

One thing to keep in mind about the Bucks

is that Bogut has missed extended periods of time lately (not the sole reason for the defensive lapse, but Dan Gadzuric is his back-up). Or maybe it just seems like he has, since I have Bogut on three fantasy teams.

I will never waste a beer. There are too many sober kids in India. -Rod Benson

by supremepuntiff on Jan 19, 2009 6:22 AM PST reply actions  

Put on your Bayless face!

I think there’s a really good chance he’s going to give Ridnour fits with his defense and ability to drive the lane.

Go Blazers!

by nikolokolus on Jan 19, 2009 7:46 AM PST reply actions  

your'e right about passing dave

the only time i remember seeing more than 2 passes after the offense was set against the ‘Cats, Greg got fouled and the bucket. The extra pass can’t hurt tonight, not that i don’t enjoy the roy show, or the rex monolouges.

Activate Shavlik Randolph

by appel82 on Jan 19, 2009 8:05 AM PST reply actions  

Hey guys,

The Bucks with Bogut are a pretty solid team but without him it’s smoke and mirrors. Their interior defense, rebounding, and offensive balance is largely predicated on what he brings.

Villanueva is typically the x-factor, especially with Bogut missing. He’s been alternating good and bad games lately, which is typically the best case scenario from a Bucks’ perspective. You just never know what you might get from him offensively, but on defense you can punish him on the block. He’s started the past couple games after coming off the bench for a long time.

Probably the single biggest issues with the Bucks’ defense lately has been defending the three point line. They help a lot on penetration and in doing so concede a lot of open threes, which they got away with early in the season but lately not so much.

by Frank Madden on Jan 19, 2009 8:19 AM PST reply actions  

Interesting

it sounds like this game would be an easy win with Steve Blake. He’s the best on the team at getting the ball to the guys on the block and also shoots the three at a sweet 43% clip.

Bayless should be able to go right around Ridnour though. He’s never been a good defender.

by Cablinasian on Jan 19, 2009 8:49 AM PST up reply actions  

Unfortunately for us,

Our three point threats are injured or hobbling. Blake is down, Fernandez is hurting, Webster has played four minutes this year. All we have is Outlaw, and he prefers to play power forward. Roy can hit them, but isn’t great, same with Rodriguez and Batum. Hope everyone gets healthy soon.

Poor grammar is poor communication.
Poor communication causes misunderstanding.
Misunderstanding causes fighting.
Fighting causes war.
War causes death.
Therefore, your poor grammar may just kill us all.

(One of Two Official Blazer's Edge Poets Laureate for the 2008-2009 Season)

by T Darkstar on Jan 19, 2009 9:22 AM PST up reply actions  

hopefully you don't buck us up tonight

our young bucks are strong enough to take on your Bucks, wanna bet… …some bucks?

Activate Shavlik Randolph

by appel82 on Jan 19, 2009 9:25 AM PST up reply actions  

Let's hope the Bucks

look like a deer in the headlights tonight, and that their ball-movement is stagnant.

by MiledAnimal on Jan 19, 2009 10:16 AM PST up reply actions  

Oden needs to have better game tonight

Get them in foul trouble. Back their bigs down like in Chicago game and draw fouls. Score 20 pts 10 rebs. easy win

"shaq and zach randolph have the same trainer... "

best one liner i ever heard.

by bowdown on Jan 19, 2009 10:45 AM PST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

The ultimate coverage and analysis of the Portland Trail Blazers.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
The Blazers Future Regarding Free Agent Signings
Small
Thunderous Manboobies
Img_0878_1__small
Why do we hate LaMarcus Aldridge?
Small
Oregonlive "journalists" 2 new posts...same old drivel
2474796688_7cdc78828f_o_small
Greg Oden Suffers Life-Ending Injury; Gets 3-Year Extension

Recent FanPosts

Small
The Blazers' Future Regarding Trades
Small
WHAT TO DO WITH NIC BATUM BECAUSE WE WILL LOSE HIM IF NOT TRADED.
Small
Trade that helps us out now and the future
Small
How can the All-Star game be more fun and competitive?
Small
Earl Boykins!
Small
LaMarcus Aldridge about to become the 10th highest scorer in Blazers franchise  history
Small
New trade that gets us a new point and a three point shooter
Small
Portland getting.....
Small
The Sun Behind the Clouds: Blazers still on track.

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

FanShots

Quick hits of video, photos, quotes, chats, links and lists that you find around the web.

Recommended FanShots

It's pretty clear that the season is over already ;)
Double rainbow of sadness:

1) JBay is getting shorter
2) We never got to see him with a mustache

I miss you tiny raptor man.

via The Basketball Jones http://blogs.thescore.com/tbj/2012/02/09/things-of-note-for-february-9-2012/#more-34561
Blazers Broadcasters Mike Barrett and Mike Rice re-enacted NBA referee Scott Foster's controversial goaltending call on Portland Trail Blazers forward LaMarcus Aldridge, who was defending Oklahoma City Thunder All-Star forward Kevin Durant, during this week's edition of Blazers Courtside. Remarkably, no one was injured during the taping of this segment.

Original video of the play here. 
Quotes from the players and coaches here. 
The NBA admitting it got the call wrong here. 
Dave's  extended thoughts here. 
BlazersMakr's FanShot: Major Vegas action on OKC prior to tip here. 
Audio of Chad Doing of 750 AM The Game going HAM on Foster here.

OK, that should just about wrap up the goaltending discussion.

Courtside video via Blazers Broadcasting cameraman John Curry.

-- Ben Golliver | benjamin.golliver@gmail.com | Twitter
In 2008 Tim Donaghy indicated that Scott Foster was a ref that also fixed games
Blazers Owner Paul Allen Ranked No. 3 American Philanthropist In 2011

Recent FanShots

"You Must Be Known For Your Defense, Because You Definitely Stole My Heart"
Bill Simmons: Deron Williams To Dallas 'Is A Lock'
LaMarcus Aldridge Needs Support Around Him
LaMarcus Aldridge Finds Out He's An All-Star With His Teammates
Congratulations to Portland Trail Blazers forward LaMarcus Aldridge, on his first All Star selection.

As seen on www.trailblazers.com
AWoj: Aldridge an All Star
CRAZY stat from Houston game
NBA MVP Rankings... LMA @ #10

+ New FanShot All FanShots >


Editors

Kitten_small Dave

Headshotsmall_small Ben Golliver

Lead Moderators

Getfuzzy-satchel_small Timmay!

Bucky3_small Cablinasian

Authors

Plainlc_small Storyteller

Moderators

Lamb_small T Darkstar

Small douglast

Terryporter_small prezofdeath

Small usmcr3049

Lrg_magpie_small Corvid

Wallpaper_small geoffm